TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

afkyle Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by afkyle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh, sorry.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:48 AM
2

dude this was fucking hilarious
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:02 PM
1

don't say butthurt, no one can take you seriously with shit like that
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:38 PM
2

3edgy
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:46 PM
0

maybe she didn't pick the name, jerk
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:09 PM
2

dickweasel isn't sexist? are you fucking retarded? oh no ableism
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:02 AM
3

get the fuck out jesus christ get out now
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:08 AM
0

oh, sorry about that, it's just like, the concept of triggers has been really watered down from our perspective, with most trigger warnings being effectively "tw: SOMETHING I DON'T LIKE" rather than "tw: something that will literally trigger my ptsd"
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:01 AM
0

well yeah, but there's gotta be some reasonable standard where people ought to know that they're doing harm. as a counterpoint to your extreme example is your batshit crazy girlfriend that, after two years, decides she is not going to consent to any further sex, but is going to act in exactly the same way, and then because you did not ascertain that she wanted to have sex before having sex, is going to accuse you of rape. it's complicated, and your extreme hypothetical is valuable, but it's not …
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:31 AM
-9

wow mras are dumb sometimes
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:54 AM
1

get out of my mensrights you belong on a shuttle to the moon
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:59 PM
5

i don't get it. what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:25 AM
0

i'm an introvert and you're making me look bad. social anxiety is social anxiety, and correlates with introversion, but it is perfectly possible to be introverted without being socially anxious. this post is not about introversion at all.
/r/seduction05/09/12 08:37 PM
-1

holy fucking shit, man. most inspiring thing i have ever read.
/r/seduction01/08/12 03:01 AM
1

sounds like a shitty place
/r/seduction10/06/12 12:56 AM
2

it's actually completely worse than that, though. sorry. best way to learn how to approach is to go balls to the wall by not being afraid of being boring. stand out with confidence, not with gimmicks.
/r/seduction10/06/12 12:55 AM
3

BOB AND GEORGE, THE MEGA MAN COMIC STRIP.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:25 AM
-1

this is so stupid there were so many other, not stupid things you could have said, and got your point across just fine but this this was fucking mouth-open drooling retarded
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:28 AM
1

it's an emphasis thing. have you ever studied anything like a symbolic logic course? i guess the closest comparison is something like mathematics, where we still like to push algebra and pre-calculus on our high-schoolers knowing full well that most people will never need to use even pre-calculus level math in their lives, but science did some studying and experience in math tends to correlate with general skill in thinking. (horribly vague term, but i am too lazy to google-fu the source.) i thi…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:55 PM
2

philosophy, at the very least, teaches rigorous logic, thoughtful ethics, and strong communication skills. singling philosophy out of all things feels just silly when a degree in music, theater, sports management, or any number of significantly more frivolous degrees exist. a philosophy degree will make an efficient worker much better than a number of other degrees. even in the hard sciences, graduate programs worth their salt will absolutely love a philosophy baccalaureate, because the training…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:15 PM
1

why doesn't a degree in philosophy count?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:33 PM
1

you say this, but this is not true.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:20 PM
5

being good with women does not necessitate being a domineering prick. if that seems like what is being preached here, you haven't read very much.
/r/seduction17/01/12 02:57 PM
1

are you serious?
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:12 AM
-1

your immature bitching is AFC, bro what's the point of trying to talk shit? get your shit together.
/r/seduction06/12/11 11:14 PM
-1

please take your bitching somewhere else, you real man you.
/r/seduction06/12/11 11:07 PM
6

i didn't know that you, specifically, were trying very hard to be offended today. if i did, i would have modified my language. i'm sorry.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 03:14 AM
1

gay rights don't belong in men's rights for the same reason that black rights don't belong in men's rights. imagine a black man being discriminated because he's black. 'get outta here you nigger!' is this a men's rights issue? no, not really. not any more than it would be a feminist issue if it was a black woman. does this mean we're a bunch of asshole homophobes? no, not really. but discriminating against gays is a gay rights issue, and they have their own communities for that. if someone is di…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:47 PM
6

are you serious? what if i'm not comfortable sleeping with a man because he's homosexual? does that make me homophobic? what if i'm not comfortable sleeping with a woman because she's stupid? does that make me stupidphobic? what you are saying is seriously fucking stupid. :x
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:49 AM
3

are you serious? you are a child and you are embarrassing yourself. please stop.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:41 AM
1

you and him contributed nothing to this discussion except jacking your e-peens. 'hurf durf just another AFC not a PUA like ME hehe wats dis doin here'
/r/seduction07/10/11 08:38 PM
1

even so, people should be allowed to do it.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 02:03 PM
-4

it's pretty easy to say someone's a conspiracy theorist and just let the connotations of the word take care of the rest, but i clicked that link and read through it, and it's not like he's stupid. he sees a lot of institutionalized antimale bias in the world (true), and feels like calling it a conspiracy. does this invalidate everything he says? i'd hope not.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:54 AM
1

oh nOoooOooOoOoooOoOOoOOoooOO
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:39 AM
1

because it's his job to make sure preggers doesn't happen. well, we just straight-up disagree about this. i would consider it a pretty even responsibility split. i guess i can see the line of thought where 'if any pregnancies happen it's completely the man's fault even though the woman pretty obviously let semen inside of her vagina. the man had a choice to not be a father by using birth control, therefore after deciding not to use birth control he clearly consented to being a father. naturally,…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 06:38 AM
3

okay, but the other person could have taken the same precautions and didn't. you're saying 'well if pregnancy happens it's pretty obviously the guy's fault because it takes two to tango' but you're not saying 'well if pregnancy happens it's pretty obviously the girl's fault because it takes two to tango' even though.......? the man is completely at the mercy of the woman's decision. this is not how it should be. the woman has several options available to her to opt out of being a mother. the fat…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:57 AM
1

but in one case you can just not have a child if you could just uncrash your car why the hell wouldn't you? other than some moral high horse about 'well you deserve that crashed car lol"
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:11 AM
5

as far as my stupid car analogy it's more like if you drive a car there's a chance you might crash if you have sex there's a chance you might get an abortion if you crash your car then fuck you better leave it crashed because YOU KNEW THE RISKS WHEN YOU DROVE YOUR CAR, STUPID RETARD don't bother fixing that car, you deserve what happened if you have sex and unintended pregnancy happens DEAL WITH IT, STUPID. YOU KNEW THE RISKS GOING INTO THIS, SO YOU BETTER RAISE THAT BABY WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR …
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:28 PM
2

oh, that's nice. well, you agree with comically stupid statements, so your troll isn't very effective here. hey guys if i drive a car i consent to car crashes.....what?
/r/MensRights28/03/11 09:46 PM
3

you did good, son. don't worry, it all gets better here on out.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:36 PM
1

i wouldn't argue we should prohibit it by law, but instead that more people should just not do it of their own volition. sure parents can make all sorts of decisions that aren't necessarily the best for children, and there's no reason for us to legislate those either, but i'm saying we should be able to as a society acknowledge that this is frivolous at best and bad at worst. or i'm saying i wish everyone agreed with me about everything since the world would clearly be a better place.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 06:03 AM
2

which is all well and good, but the problem is that we're doing a bad thing and you're saying that 'well it's not so bad, so this isn't important.' but it's a bad thing we could easily stop doing with no repercussions. there is no benefit to this procedure, there is no reason to have it done other than centuries of custom which came from a band of desert nomads worshiping a king in the sky. when a baby is born, why don't we pierce its ears instead? oh, because it's purely cosmetic and completely…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:05 AM
5

this is all well and good until we realize that on a grand enough scale nothing matters at all. so there was an earthquake in japan? nobody's gonna remember that shit a thousand years from now so humanity exists? sooner or later the sun is gonna blow up or some shit suddenly everything is a completely negligible occurrence, and why would we worry about silly things like that?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:52 AM
6

you're stupid. 'this isn't a big deal because worse things happen!!!' okay, so i punch you in the face. that's NOT A BIG FUCKING DEAL, BECAUSE THERE ARE STARVING PEOPLE AND WARS AND RACISM AND SHIT. GEEZE, GET SOME PERSPECTIVE, MORON. oh wait, that's a stupid thing to say and you're stupid for saying it...
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:38 AM
1

you're right, i definitely said we should force a woman to have an abortion! oh wait i actually said "no one is saying force a woman to have a baby any more than force a woman to have an abortion" thanks for the straw man i'll put it in my fields and scare away crows i think if you actually read the words i'm putting on the internet and considered them, you wouldn't somehow think i'm for forced abortions any more than i'm for forced childbirthing. so oh well
/r/MensRights28/02/11 04:43 PM
1

abortions and vasectomies are completely different. vasectomies are intended to be pretty permanent, and are irreversible more often than not. i don't even understand how a vasectomy is relevant at all when the issue at hand is after pregnancy a woman has complete say over whether the man becomes a father or not. i think we've established that both sexes have birth control available to them. the problem is that in any situation, whether they used protection or not, or planned for a child or not,…
/r/MensRights28/02/11 07:30 AM
1

no one is saying force a woman to have a baby any more than force a woman to have an abortion it is a tit-for-tat situation women have a 'get out of pregnancy no matter what' button and men don't this is stupid and sexist at worst a man should be able to disassociate himself from a child he didn't plan on, since a woman has the same luxury via an abortion get real LOL
/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:04 AM
1

you don't get it. i'm not saying the woman is responsible for birth control, i'm saying they're both equally responsible. i am bitching about the woman having all the say in whether the man becomes a father or not, because that's stupid. if the man takes steps which shows his intent to get the woman pregnant, and the woman takes opposite steps, and she gets pregnant. would you argue she shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion because she 'didn't take the opposite steps?' no, you wouldn't argue …
/r/MensRights28/02/11 01:39 AM
1

if a woman lets you stick your dick in her without birth control, then don't be surprised if she gets pregnant. if her intention is to NOT have a child, then she should make an effort to prevent this. the law should try not to be horribly biased for either gender. what your saying is 'well, if pregnancy happens, it's pretty obviously the man's fault. why would it matter if a man doesn't have the same control over becoming a parent as a woman? why afford them the same rights to walk away from an …
/r/MensRights27/02/11 05:31 AM
-4

so, if i don't wear a condom that's me implicitly saying 'i definitely want to get you pregnant and i accept full responsibility for any kids that may come out of you.'? what if condoms don't feel good? also, if someone goes to court over this, i can't imagine how condom use is gonna be anything but hearsay. 'your honor, i totally wrapped it EVERY TIME. it must have broke or something!' this is still a pretty slanted way to look at it: 'well it's the man's job to not get her pregnant so he bette…
/r/MensRights25/02/11 02:52 AM
7

it focuses in on a pretty interesting topic. something like 'imagine you were a woman?' can go anywhere. 'oh, i'd play with my boobs' that's not a useful thought experiment!
/r/MensRights12/02/11 08:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter