TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

againstmethod Archive

View 0 posts and 5 comments by againstmethod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Yes, that is my definition as well. Exposing falseness. This research makes their position less plausible, but it does not prove it false. Nor does it need to be falsified. We make judgements every day about what we will and wont believe given a body of evidence. When overwhelming opinion sways in one direction or another, we start to call a thing true or false. This obviously doesnt meet that standard for various reasons.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:37 PM
3

It added a detail. Debunks implies that the opposing point was proven false. These folks have provided some limited evidence to the contrary. It's not good for the pay gap position, but it doesnt debunk it.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:42 PM
4

Their title did nothing to affirm your point, the OPs retitle did make an assumption. Either way it wasnt a big deal, anyone who cares read the article.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:41 PM
9

If you bothered to read the executive summary you would see it said more than that. They also like their holidays and don’t like last minute OT. Basically it’s saying they favor their home work balance more than men. Takes two minutes to read a paragraph.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:13 PM
52

The only problem with his title is the use of debunks. Obviously a single focused study doesn’t debunk anything. I didn’t read anything implicit about the scope of the study. Anyone with basic reasoning skills understands that Harvard didnt study the whole country or world with one study.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter