TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

age_of_cage Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by age_of_cage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She's an absolute cunt clearly. He still hit that cunt way too hard as a reaction to her piddly swipe. Sometimes both sides are wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/17 09:58 PM
1

That's pretty rich when it's posted in this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 06:54 PM
1

You already did. Spamming irrelevant links won't save face.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:48 PM
3

Like I said; runner. Ta-ta.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:40 PM
2

Nice try, now provide what I actually asked for.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:36 PM
-1

Do it for me. Please provide proof of the penis being an orifice that can be sexually penetrated and case law that makes it legal rape to boot. You're making the claim so it's on you to back it up. But I think we can say goodbye right now as we both know you can prove no such thing and are about to do a runner.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:31 PM
-3

Look at what you pasted above. Point to me where it says anything about penetration of the penis. Oh wait. It's not a fucking orifice that can be penetrated, sexually or otherwise. Are you suggesting gynecologists rape their patients too? You're a fuckin nutter mate.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:26 PM
0

I'm not seeing where sexual penetration comes into circumcision. Genital mutilation? Sure thing. Rape? You're devaluing the word moronically applying it to this.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:09 PM
4

raping a child what the fuck, sir
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:46 PM
1

I provided my opinion and stood by it when challenged. I didn't rub it in anyone's face.
/r/PussyPass02/06/17 06:40 AM
1

...when does my enjoyment begin?
/r/PussyPass22/05/17 03:44 PM
1

Your definitions of both need work.
/r/PussyPass22/05/17 02:08 PM
1

You're literally calling me a jerk for not respecting someone who I vehemently don't respect.
/r/PussyPass22/05/17 02:01 PM
1

"nice" meaning "dishonest"? I'm not going to edit my opinion of him based on the feelings of others.
/r/PussyPass22/05/17 07:11 AM
–

The reason he was jailed was for being a whistleblower, cuntbucket. The trans bullshit was a ploy to gain sympathetic support from activists who wouldn't normally give the first shit about him.
/r/PussyPass20/05/17 10:40 PM
2

By having a genuinely held belief in one's gender identity and not busting it out as an excuse for political aims.
/r/PussyPass20/05/17 10:30 PM
–

For genuine transgenders, no. But he's not one.
/r/PussyPass20/05/17 10:20 PM
4

Back to Bradley within a year. This charade has served its purpose.
/r/PussyPass20/05/17 06:20 AM
1

I notice you too steered well clear of addressing my point in favour of an ad hominem attack. Because you can't contest the obvious truth of what I said no matter how much it pains you.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:02 AM
3

Yes that is an appropriate response to a selectively edited portion of my comment, if one has not seen the full quote. Congrats.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:00 AM
-1

It really doesn't negate it and in fact an argument could be put forward it supports it. Women are provided ample resources because their need is greater and more urgent than men. Because their risk is far higher.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:58 AM
2

There's a reason I specifically said risk of immediate harm and not "dying while homeless".
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:50 AM
-2

Ample resources are indeed provided to women on the whole. That does not in any way negate my point that men and women do not require the same level of support and that certain victim complex whiners should stop pretending they do.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:44 AM
-1

Now you've gotten that out your system, feel free to address the factual basis of the comments your hysteria is in response to. Or would that be inconvenient to your agenda to be forced to admit what I said was 100% correct?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:26 AM
2

No I can comfortably and factually say both.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:18 AM
-2

I've lived what you're talking about too. It doesn't affect the factual basis of my previous comments and nor does anything you've said. You haven't even touched on it because you know it's the truth. Go be a whiny victim to someone stupid enough to listen. Edit: didn't realise you're the same guy from above. While I've lived on the receiving end of domestic violence, it would not be accurate to say I've lived with a video game console as the crutch keeping me on my feet during the throes of PTS…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:05 AM
-27

Have I heard of those extreme minority exception cases? Sure. Does it nullify the factual truth of my previous comments? Not in the slightest. What irks you is that I do know exactly what I'm talking about and you find the truth awkward and inconvenient.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:53 PM
-27

No, it wasn't. I'm tired of this pretense that men and women exist on equal footing when it comes to risk of harm in situations like this and that they deserve the same level of protection. It's dishonest and embarrassing to my gender.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:39 PM
-33

but it's a cold hard fact there just simply is not same support for men as there is for women It's also a cold hard fact that a woman on the street is at a much higher risk of immediate harm than a man. Let's not pretend otherwise for the sake of self serving victimhood.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:31 PM
1

Neither does the law, hence the differentiation. You're kind of simple minded.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 07:32 PM
1

There's no way to mark cutoffs with any consistency which is why I largely support the way things already work.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 07:28 PM
1

Of course it's possible. Eta; I'm talking teenagers of course. I only add that because it's obvious what you're trying to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 07:06 PM
0

Legally incapable and mentally incapable aren't the same so kindly take it up with someone actually espousing the views you're trying to combat you boring fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 06:35 PM
0

You've purposely lied about my position to represent me as holding some pretty horrible views I actually don't in reality. You can take your gotcha questions and well and truly fuck right off.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 06:27 PM
1

So according to your logic it is perfectly okay to have sex with anyone so long as they're willing. Yes that is definitely what I said and is not contradicted by literally my very first comment in this thread. You got me.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 06:03 PM
0

Legal consent, no. But some of us live in the real world.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 05:47 PM
1

Because one implies consent and the other doesn't. But then you knew that.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 05:33 PM
-2

Using it the way you did is grossly inappropriate for either. Sorry I'm just a traveller from /all I don't subscribe to your victimhood mindset.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 04:38 PM
1

It's my conversation, you said "raping" not "statutory rape", you were being deliberately inflammatory.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 04:16 PM
-6

I'd take that bet. Statutory rape is not the same or else it would just be called plain old rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 03:48 PM
-4

I hardly approve but it wasn't rape ffs. Get a grip.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/17 01:24 PM
1

Then I would not care what I showed them or their judgement of my maturity. I would only care about proceeding about my business by getting past them and if one of them struck me, man or woman, I'd hit back harder and faster even than this guy. Those people are so beneath me I have absolutely no concern for preserving a good image in their eyes.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/17 12:00 AM
7

I mean...if you're trying to rile me with such obvious trolling...it's only making you seem stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 07:00 PM
13

Be impeded by stupid cunty children with delusions of grandeur or get where I'm going by plowing through them. I know which I would pick. The other option is for cowards.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 06:16 PM
12

They were preventing him from moving on. It's kinda the whole point.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 06:05 PM
5

She wasn't defending herself, he was through. She was just angry her shitty tactic failed.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 05:49 PM
14

Yeah he really should have just allowed himself to be impeded with no justification whatsoever, seems reasonable.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/17 05:48 PM
92

What's with the condescending tone? Your link did nothing to mitigate the outrage that a poster like this was ever approved and put up anywhere. edit; Also feel compelled to add that, even though the poster is old, it still holds true today in terms of the law and how prosecutors approach incidents like these.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:51 PM
0

I mean she literally is describing secondary victims, who the fuck wrote that bullshit for her thinking it made any sense?
/r/MGTOW03/01/17 10:02 PM
9

But if you did would you wear a burka while doing so?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/16 05:44 PM
1

...except he has gone on to defame the guy in question as a rapist without the due process he claims to value.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:29 PM
2

but the overall trend is that if something related to men being in trouble/need help/being a victim AND it reaches the front page it will be deleted/removed by the mods.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 09:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter