TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aggressivejoe Archive

View 2 posts and 123 comments by aggressivejoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Except that having a man willing to fuck you is a prerequisite to establishing a relationship with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 11:00 PM
1

I don't agree. Unless you are a landwhale, or you crossdress (why do so many hetero women think this is acceptable? would you go for a man dressed as a women?). Even a hardcore alpha man would at least fuck an average women as a consolidation prize. You just have to not be completely repulsive, and you really have to try at it to get that way as a women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 08:43 PM
7

I'd prefer TBP to be true since it is more fair. It is unfortunate that the world isn't fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 07:45 PM
2

We've gone too far. That's why TRP exists and why it's growing so fast, people are sick and tired of the incredible amount of politically correct bullshit they have to deal with in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 07:41 PM
2

Okay, which proteins manipulate behavior and intelligence? http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1571891307000994 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395606000744 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0018506X89900421 Testosterone increases tendency towards: Violence and aggression Competitiveness Sexuality Testosterone is not a protein, but whatever differences exist in the Y chromosome, it surely helps men produce a lot of it. Interesting huh? The red p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 04:23 AM
3

Except adaptions like that have costs. Anyway, there is provable differences between males and females on the basic hormonal level. Nature has decided to greatly alter the proportion of testosterone and estrogen in the human body based on your gender, and last I checked, these hormones aren't biologically inert.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 04:10 AM
2

There are two things here that are very hard for me to believe: 1) No proteins in AN ENTIRE CHROMOSOME (producing wildly different ratios of testosterone and estrogen between the genders) effect what so ever on anything except physical strength, because we know, Nature's random mutations roughly follow exactly in the footsteps of political correctness and thus can only manipulate obvious undeniable physical characteristics and not things like behavior or intelligence. 2) Why haven't women use th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 04:01 AM
1

I think you're mixing up concepts here. War is a human abstract and has very little to do with nature. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140917131816.htm Except, that's not what you're doing. You're dismissing bad behavior by using an appeal to nature even though nature has very little to do with it. What makes it bad? Is it the some kind of "human abstract" form of bad? Because it's GOOD in the natural sense. Nature does not care about fairness. It doesn't give the the society that g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:45 AM
6

By taking the resources from others even though you have enough already and then burning their homes down for shits and giggles as well as condeming them to a life of servitude. I think you're giving us humans much more credit than we actually deserve. Nature favors that behavior because the end result is the village that didn't get wiped off the map still exists and therefore can propagate. It's not just interspecies violence, there are things on this planet (viruses, etc.) that seem to serve l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:09 AM
5

I think over the course of human history peaceful societies surely could have existed as a result of random cultural and genetic fluctuations, but where exterminated as they conflicted with their more brutal neighbors. Over time, this only allows the brutal societies to propagate, including perhaps, the random fluctuations in their genetics that tipped their behavior towards violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:03 AM
5

Awesome. I have no clue what your little tangent has to do with enslaving others, murdering animals en masse not even mostly for food, and sucking every drop of oil out of the ground to burn it and pollute our own atmosphere. Here is your clue: It's driven by human intelligence combined with a more baser instinct for resource accumulation. You apparently want to separate human nature from nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:49 AM
7

Nature and evolution has this trick where it favors survival over any abstract notion of pacifism. As such the tools and behaviors that permit competition for scarce resources is very deeply embedded in the nature of not just humans, but all lifeforms. I'm not in disagreement with you that it would be awesome if Nature was all puppies and rainbows, and while we are in this fantasy lets ask her to give us some ability to turn off gravity and the speed of light too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:39 AM
5

Nobody is stopping you from living in a mud hut.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:33 AM
5

I like how you don't actually dispute her point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:30 AM
3

Agreed. After literally millions of years of these just happening to be the optimal gender roles, seems like it would be helpful for the survival of the tribe for traits helpful to these roles to also be encoded in genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:25 AM
3

Do you think these men are just randomly selected by chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:23 AM
1

That just makes it even more pathetic! Physical differences are meaningless. You don't become a king or a great leader of men just by being bigger. You get powerful through intelligence, cunning and willpower.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 02:18 AM
1

But does that mean it should? Yes, clearly men are the most qualified people for the job of running shit. Physical strength used to matter much more than it does now. But guns didn't end patriarchy. Muscles are just for show if you don't have the natural tenacity to use them. This is a tendency for self-advancement, an inherent desire to dominate others and a willingness to use violence to advance that allows you to make good use of them. In other words, manliness. The only reason these qualitie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 08:41 PM
1

Why does a patriarchy even exist? Isn't it weird that an entire gender is able to run shit for most if not all of human history?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 08:19 PM
2

You can start with: Why would I yield to your interests and worldview if it does not benefit me?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 04:30 PM
3

You don't understand what hypergamy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 04:24 PM
0

women make very good scientists and engineers Haha, that's a generalization! And a very poorly supported one at that, virtually all notable scientists throughout history had penises. Just because there's tendencies, in no way does that really allow somebody to make a legitimate generalization about an entire gender. That's a contradiction - tendencies are generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 04:16 PM
1

Lots of stuff doesn't make sense anymore. The fact that fatty and sweet foods still taste so great makes no sense. The fact that the human body is not designed for sitting on your ass 8 hours a day makes no sense. The entire complex IgE immune response makes no sense. But here is the key, it all used to make sense. If something makes sense long enough it starts getting encoded in genetics. Including behavior. As you mentioned, there two main important things in modern civilization are behavior a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 03:54 AM
8

TheRedPill is mostly growing exponentially, so there is actually a rapidly growing # people in the anger phase in any given time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 04:54 AM
3

You used the word "allow". By describing you, does a person write your destiny? Hmm all this sounds like this idea I heard that women find self-actualization challenging. I wonder where I heard that one before...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 07:41 PM
1

Let alone that TBP seems to be very inclusive of their definition of women too. That's fine. We can agree that TRP is not ment for picking up girls with penises.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 06:01 PM
1

Let's cut them some slack. They don't have a philosophy they respect that teaches them how not to be fearful and how to maintain frame! Another day, another new batch of blue pillers deleting their posts on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 05:55 PM
1

From what i read about this post, its all about what YOU want in a relationship. Nothing inherently wrong with that, but hhl is saying shes not convinced most men are happy in egalitarian relationships like you describe. Im not convinced they are either. This reminds me of those threads where girls post "i had a great relationship and my SO started 'acting redpill' and now it sucks." The obvious point missing is, if the relationship was so great then WHY would her bf suddenly turn to TRP? But sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 05:47 PM
1

Hahah no. Conflict and confrontation is hugely enjoyable to me as I am sure it is to other men. I go on TRP to read and provide advice, commenting all the time in a place where everyone agrees with you is just too easy. Besides being a convenient punching bag, TBP serves a very useful purpose. If they are outraged about something specific, it means it's worth paying attention to. Because it probably contains a strong truth about reality. People don't get angry about things that are insulting but…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 05:32 PM
3

Suit yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 04:15 AM
5

You ought to do it more often then. It's seems to be a good way to maintain frame in your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 04:08 AM
1

Quitters never win! Indeed. Believing in yourself is a prerequisite to success. even if they ultimately don't attain superiority. TRP also teaches that men are the disposable gender, the propagation of a society entirely depends on women because of the sperm-to-womb imbalance (few men can impregnate many women). This is why competition to the top is such a big part of male sexual strategy. In a world where most the cowboys are gone, it's much easier to be a cowboy. Modern society has made it eas…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 04:02 AM
5

Well, maybe I should have been more precise. Whether you report failures or successes, the end goal still seems to be the approval of the TRP sesspit. You're either achieving it, or you're seeking out an avenue to achieve it. This is just my own judgment. That's interesting, but I can't accept it because you don't sound very confident in yourself. Especially with the way you framed that last sentence. Some time studying TRP can help you with this problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 03:52 AM
1

I get your point and it makes perfect sense. Your title is what is triping people though, because it might imply a tabula rasa that is blue pill. Although not as provactive, I think your point is more "everyone's first exposure to the world is blue pill".
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 02:33 AM
7

That's correct. That's why I advertised it as personal observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:19 AM
8

Your efforts of trying to sink TRP be so much easier if that was the case. The problem with TRP theory is it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:03 AM
1

It's not possible, because BluePill is fundamentally wrong. That's why it's a satire and some kind of alternative theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 02:01 AM
5

True. But such traits of confidence is so rare in modern society, that even an attempt in believing in the power of oneself can change your life for the better as a man (the so called "fake it till you make it" part of TRP theory). In regards to the hypocrisy. There are hordes are men out there right now that are being tought that it's not okay to act like a man. Men are assertive, dominant, aggressive, even violent. There is a reason why men were the warriors throughout history. This is the nat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:46 AM
3

If that makes you feel better about yourself, honey. The reality is even the most beta man could probably take you down a peg if big bad government (unfortunately, ultimate alpha male) wasn't there to protect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:37 AM
-1

what if women want to be better than everyone else? including some men? then why does TRP tell them to be submissive and listen to men? They can't be better then me. That's silly. If they try to, I will cut them down.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:34 AM
2

But I don't want to be equal to everyone else. I strive to be better then everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:32 AM
8

Show me where women preached on how a man should act towards them in a romantic sense. As opposed to what, an incel sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:20 AM
2

Go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:14 AM
12

Explain. All Im getting is women cant be one thing, and have an attraction to something. Preaching some way men should act while having attraction to the exact opposite thing is pretty fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:05 AM
5

Fair enough. Fetishes, especially uncommon ones can be explained entirely by random behavorial mutations that can even be determental to survival or procreation. My personal observation is LTRs around BDSM are almost exclusively maledom. While femdom is more of a sex worker / porn thing. This correlates with the idea that women prefer dominant men for actual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 12:21 AM
9

I hate calling it "progressive", because it implies progress. "Progressives" are really just Marxists that changed their name when being called Marxist became somewhat of a slur in the 50s. Just like all Marxism, it looks great on paper and in ivory tower discussions, but is horrible in reality.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 10:16 PM
-1

Hypergamy is the perfect sexual strategy for women. Hypergamy is looking for the best man (highest SMV) to stick to. There is a balance between leaving that man if his SMV gets too low compared to other options and the investment in the relationship, no women is going to leave her man for a man who she thinks is only slightly hotter. But it happens, and when it does, it's usually the man's fault for beta'ing out too much. Women who are completely lacking hypergamy are broken in the sexual strate…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 10:01 PM
0

My guess is sub men is projection combined with the idea that men will do anything to get the pussy. Like: "I would enjoy being dominant, therefore I'm making her happy and she is more likely to find be appealing sexually if I act in this way." It's bizarre as fuck when you consider TRP, but if you live in the Blue Pill world it makes perfect logicial sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 09:46 PM
2

This is easy actually. It's obvious that the submissive nature of the female gender allows men to run shit. The whole feminism response is not that RedPill is in any way wrong. They don't bother with that, to some degree it's like arguing with someone that the sky is blue - it's plainly obvious. It's that you are a MEANIE for pointing it out. We are shitlords because we don't want to live in a fucking lie, that's what it comes down to. The Matrix comparison is incredibly apt.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 09:11 PM
-1

No problem. Bigot implies I have no interest in other people's opinions. What you are probably looking for is misogynist. Which is often applied by SJWs and BPers to people who believe women are in any way inferior to men, even when it's plainly obvious in many areas (physically, etc.). If you want to live in a lie, that's your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 08:49 PM
-1

Hypergamy. In a world where there is a bunch of shitty men and one good man, that girl is definately going to be fucking that one man. But yes, there are two types of woman - hypergamious women, and women that have some kind of psychological problem that overpowers their hypergamy, probably from long-term or short-term exposure to toxic substances.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:47 PM
1

They are angry. TBP serves a very useful purpose though. If they are outraged about something specific, it means it's worth paying attention to. Because it probably contains a strong truth about reality. People don't get angry about things that are insulting but false. If I call someone who is obviously not cripple a gimp, he'll either ignore it or think it's a kind of joke. But you call a cripple a gimp, that's hugely insulting. Why? Because it's accurate. The eptiome of "asshole'ish" behavior …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:28 PM
0

Sexual selection trait != trait required for sexual desire. I hypothesise the masculine motivations that drives human development orginate from sexual selection, but are not attached to sexual desire. Just like you shaving your beard doesn't necessarily make you feel asexual, even though many think that beards were sexually selected. I don't agree with the idea proposed by /u/Transman4Life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:07 PM
1

Didn't work for the rats.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:04 PM
1

It follows from TRP theory on the origins of sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:03 PM
1

Thank you. It means a lot to me that you feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:01 PM
2

Why does there need to be so much digging to find examples of notable female contributions to science? They aren't even a minority. They make up 50% or more of the fucking population. I know it's the patriarchy's fault right? Well why does a fucking patriarchy even exist? Isn't it weird that an entire gender is able to run shit for most if not all of human history?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:50 AM
2

Women seem to generally lack the motivation to be great scientists or builders of civilization. It not really ability or intelligence. It's motivation. Men have the motivation for sexual reasons, women have no such sexual reason. If men start to lose their natural motivations, women will not pick up the slack. The world would just die out, much like the famous rat experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:39 AM
4

A study published in 1999 by the German Institut für rationale Psychologie, found that about 2/3 of the interviewed women stated a desire to be at the mercy of their sexual partners from time to time. 69% admitted to fantasies dealing with sexual submissiveness, 42% stated interest in explicit BDSM techniques, 25% in bondage. 91% of women in D/s relationships perfer to be the submissive. I don't think women have it in them to be convincingly dominant. It's difficult for them to enjoy it too. And…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 03:48 AM
3

They ironically describe themselves accurately. Perpetual rage machine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:34 AM
4

I appreciate the additional insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:27 AM
5

I'm proud of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 06:05 AM
6

It is quite unfortunate then, that your ideology moves the world in the opposite direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 05:48 AM
1

Remember these out of control cultural marxist movements are only a tiny blip in history and mostly a overreaction to unchecked social darwinism a la WWII. I don't think they have lasting power.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 05:40 AM
7

Male feminists are men that are indoctrinated into thinking white knighting is a legitimate way to get pussy. Many of us have been there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 05:16 AM
1

Anything saying women are more "xyz negative trait" like solipsistic, hypergamous, dishonorable, selfish, irrational, gold-digging or whatever. But why is it negative trait? Why wouldn't women be solipsistic, hypergamous, dishonorable, selfish, irrational, gold-digging? A negative trait would be something that hinders survival and procreation. It seems all those traits with perhaps excluding irrationality are advantageous to a sexual strategy that relies on the fact that producing offspring carr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 01:05 AM
6

Those are all pretty standard shit tests. There is a really good article on TRP main page right now about passing shit tests. Women go for men that either have made it, or they believe can make it. You won't find a women, not even a feel good BPer feminist believe in unicorns women, who will date you knowing what you just admitted. You absolutely have to "fake it till you make it". You have no other choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 06:40 AM
1

Wow that's pretty sad. Although she sounds like a total bitch, women are passive creatures. Their emotions are driven by their environment. It's usually your fault when she acts shitty. I agree with the other things said, but want to add that you right now need to start acting like a man around her. This isn't complicated. This is biology. This is mostly body language. When interacting with her, look her in the eyes. If she is not looking at you, tell her to look at you. Get manly angry (not bit…
/r/askTRP15/12/14 06:28 AM
12

This is the most important takeaway. Your techniques are your fucking trade secret. Don't give them away to people you directly compete with.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 06:06 AM
5

We've all been there man. Just knowing what a shit test is and the general way to respond to them will have a noticable effect on your life. It will take practice.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/14 06:02 AM
1

Changed men into little bitches that need penis meds to get their shit up. At least finish the job, invest in genetic engineering to remove the penis and give men the permanent manginas you feminists want them to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 05:54 AM
0

Anonymously at least, the best way to spread TRP is to insult it: "Look at all the anti-women shitlords at /r/TheRedPill. What unbelivable losers! Ha ha!" It's okay to shit talk TRP. Nobody believes comments at face value on the Internet. Let's be honest, that's how most of us found this place. SJWs (or maybe fake SJWs?) are the reason why this sub has so many subscribers! And since you are pandering to political correctness, your post is less likely to get deleted by the Internet Thought Police…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 11:38 PM
6

Let's hope the rest of the world is equally feminizing their military, otherwise this country is fucked in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/14 04:22 AM
1

Feminism is just the gender face of Cultural Marxism. The doctrine strives for a society that is truly equal. Like economic Marxism, it's very hard to argue against at face value. It sounds good in theory. But it is just a distorted view of true nature. To get this kind of equality, we have to pretend genetics don't exist, that humanity is a single identity where no race or gender or even any real difference (especially in personality or intelligence) exists between people. Maybe one day this wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 02:57 AM
3

The alternative to Red Pill is to be a AFC.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 02:45 AM
1

I like how fast your responses are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 04:28 AM
2

The other way to back up psychology is through neuroscience, but the theory behind aspects of the brain that cause complex behaviors is not as scientifically developed as evolutionary theory is. I'm only interested in the evolutionary perspective as it is the best way speculate with scientific backing - evolutionary theory of course is strongly supported by now. Life, humans included, all just follow an optimization problem - everything that doesn't make sense along the lines of survival optimiz…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 04:22 AM
1

Women scientists exist, but their contributions to human advancement are overall, extremely lame. Because of this feminists grab onto any women in history who vaguely did anything scientifically interesting and deify them to the point of ridiculousness. Annie Jump Cannon for instance, who was a mere employee of a real scientist, and her entire contribution was largely driven by his directions. Unfortunately Pickering will never get his own Google doodle because he had a penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 04:09 AM
2

Do you have a shitty sex life? IMO in marriages the first thing you need to fix is your sex life, because it's one of the more "socially acceptable" places to act dominiant.
/r/askTRP12/12/14 03:46 AM
6

Women ought to be allowed in hotels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 08:47 AM
1

I've tried it before. It just ends up being akward. "Unnatural" maybe? A study published in 1999 by the German Institut für rationale Psychologie, found that about 2/3 of the interviewed women stated a desire to be at the mercy of their sexual partners from time to time. 69% admitted to fantasies dealing with sexual submissiveness, 42% stated interest in explicit BDSM techniques, 25% in bondage. 91% of women in D/s relationships perfer to be the submissive. I stand by what I said, they just aren…
/r/askTRP07/12/14 05:18 AM
1

This is what porn doesn't tell you: there is a director telling the femdom porn star every little thing to do because women have no idea how to act dominant. I mean, It requires a kind of "violence" they simply don't have. Women SUCK ASS at femdom. Even if you tried to have a D/s relationship with the women on top, you'd have to coach her through everything, all the time. Is it really D/s in that case, when you are telling her to do femdom and exactly how to act? It might not explictly ruin your…
/r/askTRP07/12/14 04:14 AM
1

Yup, many people found TRP for this very reason. Other people apperently cope by abusing prescription drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:43 AM
1

Alright well, that's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:36 AM
1

Feel free to attack the underpinnings of Red Pill theory specifically and directly. I've yet to find any compelling counterarguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:32 AM
1

We scrutinize human behavior all the time. It's called psychology. Yes. Evolutionary psychology can generalize behavior of entire groups. It's not typically applied to humans because teh feels & special snowflakes. But the "Required Theory Reading" section of TheRedPill applies it to human behavior well enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:28 AM
1

Yep. Our genes are very similar to the orangutangs'. And perhaps because of this they have behavior that is more human then most other animals (eg: tool use, alpha males - ha ha). Naturally we have no problem scientifically generalizing the behavior of entire species of animals, but human behavior [to social justice warriors] does not justify the same level of scientific scrutiny despite the immense genetic similarity in our species. And despite no real evidence that our genetic drift occurs any…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:19 AM
1

Not if you do a little research. "People are more or less biologically equivalent." http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask166 - Humans are 99.9% similar. "People's behaviors at the largest time scales are entirely molded by natural selection." Really to say otherwise is to say humans are magically immune to the process of evolution which is a load of bullshit. "Behavior can be generalized by evolution and genetics." There is entire field of science called "behavioral genetics" that does exactly tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 03:03 AM
1

What is this? A position with nary an attempt at logicial justification? You seem to be in the process of proving the TRP adage that women are not driven by logic but their feelings. The problem is I don't actually care about your feelings. I care about the truth. Could it be that women and men are largely optimized for their respective sexual selection goals? Could it be that gasp a philosophy based on evolutionary psychology could gasp be correct? Even it doesn't match social justice/PC/femini…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 02:46 AM
3

True. They can have deep respect and awe for their men though. Usually the men that they respect don't require empathy to begin with. You know you failed as a man if you use your SO as your therapist. The emotionally stable, stoic, indepedent, calculating man is the same man that you and I came down from. They brought us into existence. I believe that same behavior that helped our ancestors survive harshness for tens of thousands of years is within all men - none of us would exist otherwise. I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 02:07 AM
1

Your philosophy is full of unicorns! People are more or less biologically equivalent. People's behaviors at the largest time scales are entirely molded by natural selection. Behavior can be generalized by evolution and genetics. Anything else is a feel good lie about how Nature actually works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 01:48 AM
1

We wouldn't be here if TRP didn't work. You can look at thankTRP and other sources for plenty of examples of people's lives changing for the better, entire marriages being saved, etc. etc. Of course you might be cynical and say it's all fake but whatever. If you have an alternative BP unicorn-friendly theory to save AFCs who can't get any game, or even broken marriages let us know. All your BPers actually do is complain about "teh masssognisst shitlords", you don't actually help anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 01:25 AM
2

I'm only interested in the evolutionary perspective as it is the best way speculate with scientific backing - evolutionary theory of course is strongly supported by now. Life, humans included, all just follow an optimization problem - everything that doesn't make sense along the lines of survival optimization is just a random fluctuation that gets sorted out over the evolutionary long term. Common behaviors can be supported best by finding a survival advantage to that behavior. With that in mind…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 01:04 AM
1

Fair enough. Just changing my approach to sex was enough to change my marriage from near divorce to very happy for both of us, it really was that easy. I mean sex is this amazing thing now. YMMV. But I think we can all agree to not be a fat ass.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/12/14 11:01 PM
1

If you want to investigate further, you'll have to buy the linked reference. Sexually degrading women is better for your mental health too apperently: "However, they were no more likely to have been coerced into sexual activity, and were not significantly more likely to be unhappy or anxious—indeed, men who had engaged in BDSM scored significantly lower on a scale of psychological distress than other men." -Demographic and Psychosocial Features of Participants in Bondage and Discipline, “Sadomas…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:09 PM
1

A study published in 1999 by the German Institut für rationale Psychologie, found that about 2/3 of the interviewed women stated a desire to be at the mercy of their sexual partners from time to time. 69% admitted to fantasies dealing with sexual submissiveness, 42% stated interest in explicit BDSM techniques, 25% in bondage. 91% of women in D/s relationships perfer to be the submissive. But I'm sure it's the patriarchy or misogynist shitlords or some shit making women this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 09:44 PM
0

You have got to be fucking joking! Just because she married your "pudgy ass" doesn't mean she's still attracted to you. Except it's not important. You can be fucking hardcore 6'6 body builder and she'll still think you are a creep if you act like a fucking pussy. Focus on the important things first. Women are very attracted to your actions and words more then anything else. Not only that, it's a whole lot easier to change your behavior then your body. I'm not sugar coating it, physical apperence…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/12/14 09:15 PM
3

I think men have natural ambition derived from all the sexual selection over many years of evolution. This has become so inate to our behavior that ambition can occur without the explict goal of attracting women, in a sense, it has become seperated from its original purpose. That's why men who pretty much have optimized their sexual fitness still want more, their desire for affluence is not necessarily sexual. But yeah, all the sexy and hot bitches your sperm count can handle sounds exactly like…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 08:44 PM
1

I like it. It shows she cares about how she looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 08:19 PM
2

For (1), you ought to be in a relationship where you can tell her basically any time you feel like to give you a blowjob and swallow your cum and she ought to be capable of doing so without much argument. Of course she may not be capable of being sexually submissive to you, well not really, that's actually rare as fuck in women IMO, and more likely a consequence of you not doing something right as a man any anything wrong with her. Sexual submissiveness also starts to leak out from the bedroom a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 08:15 PM
5

Bitter in what sense? Men naturally find female psychology abhorrent at first, because it is so alien to our own psychology. All of RP theory necessarily rests on observations of female evolutionary psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 07:52 PM
4

Another post in a similar vein: http://www.reddit.com/r/marriedredpill/comments/2o5y56/fr_fill_your_wife_with_lust/ This shit really works. Fuck hitting the gym, "changing your life", etc. that isn't really needed for marriedredpill. She already married your pudgy ass for whatever it is worth. All you need to do to have a healthy marriage is act like a fucking man!!
/r/MarriedRedPill06/12/14 06:30 PM
3

Perfect response.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/12/14 05:58 PM
-1

RP just flat out works. This stuff is a marriage saver. Also, I think it's more important to know to pass fitness/shit tests then comfort tests. Erring on the side of being "too alpha" is better even in a marriage.
/r/MarriedRedPill06/12/14 05:55 PM
3

Go to marriedredpill and see the posts of men who turned broken marriages around without even putting much of an effort into it. To be honest I think RP works even better for married men because the chick has "investment" in the relationship and is less likely to back away if you fuck up something. You don't even need to work out or "change your life", you just need to learn how to pass her shit tests and act more dominant and RP can change a failing LTR right around.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:32 AM
2

All this stuff works for married men too. You can be in a LTR where she won't cheat, and the probability of a sucessful LTR is propotional to how manly you act. You'll also get far more (and better) sex, she'll ask for less, she'll respect you more, amogst other advantages.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:29 AM
1

Great post. This is something worthy of being a main topic on TheRedPill.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:24 AM
4

Yep. Women are also responsible for the propagation of our species - we wouldn't exist without them. It's possible to respect them for what they are while understanding their true nature.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 12:19 AM
1

Understanding the world for what is? Study Cosmology too. It's interesting. Study everything. One of the most manly traits is an awareness and curiosity about the world around you.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 12:00 AM
5

Be friendly and confident. Dress nicely.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 11:57 PM
1

Genetically engineer out the fundamental biology that creates different sexual goals between the sexes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 11:41 PM
7

Now.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 09:50 PM
-1

I doubt you are for real.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 09:20 PM
0

Verrrrrry normal. Like most women, you are a little submissive bitch.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 09:18 PM
12

Yes. Women are a lot of fun. It's not about hating women but understanding they are not equal to men. In fact by realizing that, it can result in happier relationships for both sides.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 08:51 PM
1

No. Slut shaming a man is nonsensical, like shaming a man for being too attractive or affluent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 08:14 PM
3

This is true. Why do you think we have posts about treating women like children? Because most of them act like children. Thinking of them as pets is just taking it one step further. Hey man, if it is your thing, you can even pretty easily convince most woman to wear a leash and a collar and follow you around on her hands and knees.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 07:56 PM
2

Married pill is a lot easier. All you have to do is know how to pass shit tests and dominate her in bed and out of bed and she'll be sucking your dick on command within days or shit, even hours. Even if you were super beta the day before. It is really that effective.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/14 07:40 PM
6

Your dad perhaps gave you the most important piece of advice a dad could give.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 04:50 AM
1

You don't need penatration. It's the thought that matters. Just have her suck your dick. As an added bonus, tell her to beg for your cum and thank you after swallowing.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 04:40 AM
7

Always be aggressive, but don't go full on BSDM the first time (unless she knows beforehand..).
/r/askTRP29/11/14 03:56 AM
3

Your subconscious is already alpha. You just need to bring it out.
/r/askTRP28/11/14 04:32 AM
4

You just have to accept the nature of women. The greatest disrespect you can give to a women is to treat them like you would another man, and that includes expecting them to be equivalent to you mentally or emotionally. Women are good for making you feel good about yourself, raising a family and sex. That cultural shit is all a facade. If your women seems outspoken in some way you don't like, tell her you won't have it. She'll stop quickly. Even true for some of the most indoctrinated women. Wom…
/r/askTRP28/11/14 04:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter