TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ahhidk Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by ahhidk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

There's also discussion within Jewish circles that the expulsion from Eden was purposeful. Gd wanted Adam and Eve to disobey him and evolve as independent beings. I like to think that Eve taking the initiative shows how forward thinking and confident women truly are - rather than all that bullshit about "original sin."
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/08/20 09:55 PM
22

There are other stories that say Adam was not happy that she would not be subservient so he lied and said she was fornicating with an angel and therefore sinning and she was banished to Hell. That's why Eve was made from his rib, then she wasn't his equal like Lilith was.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/08/20 09:52 PM
12

This is what people in the comments seem to neglect. Everyone wants to talk about how in their relationship they thank each other for doing work, but is anyone considering her boyfriend probably hasn't thanked her once for a whole month's worth of cooking (and cleaning up afterwards)? Why is he owed gratitude when she probably hasn't been receiving it?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy27/04/20 02:10 AM
1

Three Women, no contest. The other books are great, but I'd LOVE to hear the FDS thoughts and perspectives on Three Women.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy20/04/20 06:30 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:37 AM
2

Wooow, I can't believe you still missed the whoooole entire point. THEY ARE MAD BECAUSE THERE ARE ALL OF THESE POSTERS SAYING "HEY, WATCH YOUR DRINK" BUT NONE AIMED AT THE PEOPLE HARMING OTHERS. Of course they're not going to include a section on a poster for victim's for aggressors. That's asinine. They're literally mad because there is only one type of poster, and that's advocating for ways to protect yourself. When there should be TWO kinds, one for victims AND one for aggressors. Another sid…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:53 AM
–

"Spiking a drink requires you to buy the drug, then maliciously spike the drink, and most likely carry out the act of rape. That isn't getting caught up in the moment or letting your inhibitions go." So, my first point was correct? That car accidents are inherently, logically different than rape? Huh, weird. Again, with the "not all men" catch. No one is saying all men rape. And no one is saying that men are children, or should be treated as such. I already pointed out how "not all men" do this,…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:34 AM
–

So you don't think we should advocate against drunk driving? Because "The daily reminder not to commit a felony is just taking the approach that we're all morons." You just made a complete 360 against your first comment. You're still completely ignoring the actual purpose of the post. It's fine to say "wear a seat belt so drunk drivers don't kill you!" But it's a problem when there aren't signs also saying "don't drink and drive!" When I brought the purpose up, you basically just took the long w…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 09:29 PM
–

I have nothing against teaching people self defense. I'm a huge advocate for spiked keychains, pepper spray, tazers, self defence classes, and whatever else. But the problem here is that they're strictly telling women to protect themselves. You brought up drunk driving, and how they advocate to wear a seat belt AND not to drink and drive. Well, in lieu of that, where are the signs advocating not spiking drinks? The point of this post is "we understand we have to watch our drinks, but why aren't …
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:13 PM
–

The point is completely null because one you usually can't help, because it's an ACCIDENT. One is done on purpose, knowingly. You can't compare an accident to someone committing a crime, because there is no comparison.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:25 PM
–

You don't look down at a text message and accidentally put a roofie in someone's drink. There's a logical difference between spiking a drink and getting into an accident.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 03:11 AM
2

Strict gender roles are great. And apparently rampant gendercide doesn't fit into the 'gender politics bullshit.'
/r/MensRights22/07/14 02:28 AM
2

Trust has nothing to do with it. If you don't want a child, stay protected. Both partners should always be using protection, no matter what. Neither is 100%, sooo many kids are birth control kids.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:49 AM
0

I think she means that assault in any case isn't right. The woman shouldn't have assaulted him and he shouldn't have assaulted her.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:44 AM
1

Obviously that's what I meant. Pedophilia is an adult experiencing attraction to children. But you completely glazed over everything else. Bestiality, rape, kidnapping, gang bangs, etc etc. Those are mental illnesses.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 02:10 AM
0

Because it is perpetuating violence?? What kind of question is that. Ending the cycle will end the crimes. And before you jump to the conclusion I mean all the crimes ever, no. I mean the ones that were created and perpetuated. There will always be mental illness, but by no means is everyone who commits such crimes mentally ill. But we should take the opportunity to decrease the possibility and normalization of these crimes indefinitely, not just for a couple months.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:47 AM
2

No it doesn't. Her boyfriend was also charged and has also been released.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:21 AM
0

Yeah, I literally just said all that. And then addressed how it also creates new interest in those kinks... Did you read my reply at all? Or any actual studies for that matter?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:05 AM
0

I didn't take the quote out of context. The only line before that is about showing breasts. With the one other sentence, it has the same context. Someone brought up that women should be shamed for mentioning they're women on the internet, because otherwise they don't have anything to actually contribute. So I simply asked, what if someone had a feminine username but really did contribute something? Since the person was saying if you hint at being a woman on the internet, you obviously have nothi…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:47 PM
-1

I don't think you've ever actually read a study or anything related. But rape porn, the same with horror movies, make rapes and violent crimes decrease. Because it's satiating who ever wanted to go out and commit such crimes. The thing is, when gullible people or teens see rape porn, it shapes their sexuality and ideas. And although rape porn is satiating potential rapists, it's also creating new ones. There have been countless studies where people 18 and under have watched porn and now believe …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:17 PM
-1

That doesn't actually happen though. What does anyone have to ask for over the internet? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:07 PM
0

You must have missed all the links. http://www.motherjones.com/media/2014/06/street-harassment-survey-america http://msmagazine.com/blog/2013/10/21/when-street-harassment-is-more-deadly-than-catcalls/ http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/about/what-is-street-harassment/why-stopping-street-harassment-matters/
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:16 AM
-28

So women can contribute a whole great post of substance, but as soon as they have a feminine sounding username, they're shamed? This doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:52 AM
-60

You just added the first sentence about posting pictures of breasts? It still means the same exact thing.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:03 AM
0

I don't think you understand what the idea behind the slut walk is.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:51 AM
-60

'The only interesting thing about you is your naked body.' And you all are in support of this sentence? It's sexist and disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:38 AM
0

Although I partially agree in the way that private sex is not political, being kink critical (NOT kink negative) is actually okay. You can't just blindly bash kinks you hate, you have to have a solid reason. But kinks are a huge part of most people's lives, and regardless of what most people think, they do effect more than just your bedroom. Kinks create demands for porn. And when kinks that would be harmful acted outside of consent are made into porn, it shapes viewer's ideas and beliefs. Mostl…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:11 AM
1

All I see are anarchists distancing themselves from 'bros.' Anarchy and this image have little to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:38 AM
1

They think that classes are a joke.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:58 AM
–

Feudalism has a caste system, no one moves from one class to another. Anarchism believes in a class-less society.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:26 PM
–

How is this anti-MRA? This doesn't include anything about men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:12 PM
1

The thing is, the person birthing the child is (most likely) a female, so (most likely) calls themselves 'mother.' Not every mother has an accompanying father, nor a partner at all. By using partner instead, that includes fathers and/or the other mother, but by just saying 'fathers,' that excludes the other mother. But if they want to get technical about inclusion, they shouldn't even refer to the person giving birth as 'mother.' There are transmen that are pregnant. But this article doesn't say…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:49 PM
–

Journalists can't put 'rape' until she was actually charged with it. 'Alleged rape' is what should have been put. And even though a journalist doesn't put the correct terminology, it doesn't change the case or the laws. This is statutory rape. If found guilty, she will have to register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:38 PM
0

Thanks for proving my point. :)
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:14 PM
0

It's relevant in that it was an accidental case, although it could have been prevented. What I'm saying is your request is ludicrous. You want me to find a case where a man is a drug and alcohol addict, got into a fight with another man, which resulted in him lunging out at a couple, and accidentally cutting a child's cheek in the altercation. Who then subsequently went to court, and then was given strict probation and rehabilitation over jail time. You want me to find THAT specific case, or els…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:21 AM
0

Here's another: http://fox4kc.com/2013/03/08/man-receives-2-years-probation-for-ferret-that-chewed-sons-fingers/ He left his child unattended with an animal that was prone to 'nipping,' and got off after the animal chewed the kid's fingers off. Not even a reason why (like a dependency problem) Not to mention all the men who get off after purposely and repeatedly raping children and teenagers.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:18 AM
1

Claim of 'bogus stats,' no actual statistics or sources to prove otherwise Few comments down I posted supporting evidence for my 'bogus stats'
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:05 AM
0

Can you not read? 'Trials are judged case by case.' But I'll humor you. A man purposely and repeatedly sexually abusing his own child(ren): http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/justice/delaware-du-pont-rape-case/ In this article (http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/crime/2014/03/28/sunday-preview-du-pont-heir-stayed-prison/7016769/) it even says: 'Some also said her view that treatment was a better idea than prison is a justification typically used when sentencing drug addicts, not child rapists.'…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:55 AM
0

Did you just really link to a blogspot with information from before 2000? Let me catch you up to date with a study published in 2010: 'One of the most controversial disputes affecting the discourse related to violence against women is the dispute about the frequency of false allegations of sexual assault. In an effort to add clarity to the discourse, published research on false allegations is critiqued, and the results of a new study described. All cases (N = 136) of sexual assault reported to a…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:36 AM
0

In case you didn't know, trials are judged case by case usually. The reason she (accidentally) CUT a child was because she was drunk and also probably high on something. So instead of shipping her off to jail where she would go through withdraw alone while wasting tax payers' money, they sent her to rehab, where she could actually get off drugs and alcohol for good. Good judges opt for rehab over jail time a lot. It's the sensible thing to do. In America, we just throw literally everyone in jail…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:25 AM
4

TERF is a slur to actual TERFs, they hate being reminded that they are being shitty people. And if you personally want to believe that the whole movement of feminism, which has many different views, holds TERF ideology because a few well known feminists said some TERFy stuff, then of course you'd be okay with feminists saying that all MRAs, many of whom have differing views, all hold the same ideals as Paul Elam or Stefan Molyneux? No true scotsman fallacy is a bad policy to press. You're confus…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:22 AM
1

2-6% of rape claims have been found to be false. That isn't a crisis at all. More of a crisis is 60% of rapes go unreported.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:01 AM
-1

"...it fully on condition that she remain supervised by probation and welfare services for 18 months. She also said Kinsella, of Grace Park Meadows, Drumcondra, North Dublin, is entitled to credit for time spent in custody between last December and April. Judge Ring warned the sentence will be reactivated if she commits any offence or fails to co-operate with probation. Kinsella was bailed in April to take up part-time residential drug treatment at the Cavan Centre in Ballyjamesduff and is now o…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter