TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ahhwell Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by ahhwell on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

To be fair, this is in part because we don't have the words "boyfriend" or "girlfriend" in Danish. We just have "significant other".
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:36 PM
9

This isn't 'Mens rights' - it's literally going out of your way to find something to be offended by, give your head a shake. Right now, it's the third most upvoted story on /r/worldnews. You really don't have to go out of your way to find it. And yes, 53 people were rescued. Yet the title of both the article and the /r/worldnews post write 49 people. Why? Why should it be a better outcome to rescue 49 women and children than to rescue 53 people? I think it's a good find by OP, a great example of…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:10 PM
1

You're boring and useless. I'm out.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:02 PM
1

Still nothing productive from you? Come on, you can do better.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:31 PM
1

Who ever said I was a feminist? Meanwhile, you still haven't even specified which claim you want a source for! Are you going to contribute to this conversation at any point, or am I wasting my time here?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 05:11 PM
1

I served you up a whole platter of cherries, feel free to pick your own. Regardless, I provided you with a source, balls in your court now. At the very least, you should specify which claim you find dubious, and why.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:46 AM
1

Ms Kearton said the dominant trend now sees men attacking other men, but that offenders appear to be getting younger as links are drawn with existing gangs and initiations for younger members.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 07:37 AM
0

Which part of it do you find dubious? That most victims are men? In that case the OP will do fine as a source. Or that most suspects are men? I can't imagine why you would find that dubious, but it would be really easy to find a source for.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:11 AM
0

They replaced "all thy sons" with "all of us". Same number of syllables, same essential meaning, just gender neutral. What do you mean when you call this "cumbersome"?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:36 PM
1

Simply that I am acknowledging a miscalculation on my part. Awesome, we have a point of agreement! If all else fails, this is at least slightly constructive. When someone casually throws around cursing (which he did in the message you're taking affront from) I assume they have the wherewithal to handle sarcasm. You weren't being sarcastic. I know you wrote the /s, but immediately after you still said that other poster wanted "mass censorship", and again compared it with North Korea policy. At th…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:07 PM
1

Lack of an in depth and nuanced answer to your questions, after you've insulted someone, isn't a failing on their part. It's a failing on your part, because you started out by poisoning the conversation. Maybe they largely agreed with your position, maybe you could've changed their mind, maybe they really were crazy censorship loving autocrats. You won't get to know, because you started out with an insult that you failed to apologise for. And for the record, every government has restrictions on …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:54 PM
1

Dude, you started the insults. Telling someone they're like north Korea is an insult, and a rather harsh one at that. Recognize first that you started the bullshit, then maybe things can move forward.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:57 PM
1

Look through my own exchange with you and you'll notice a distinct difference in tenor between us. I'm the one being patient. So, I've looked through your exchange. It started with you comparing the other person's fairly benign point with N. Korean levels of censorship. And then it continued by the fact that you didn't immediately apologize for that bit of stupidity. Any insults thrown at you at that point are entirely justified.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:32 PM
1

Ok. I guess we're not gonna see eye to eye on anything here, so I'm out.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:21 PM
1

You're still coming across very combative. Several people have pointed that out to you. Now I'm saying it too. Accept it, or don't, I can't control what you want to believe. But you should at least acknowledge that a lot of people perceive your tone as combative.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:54 PM
1

Quote from OP: "You know who else forced her son to wear a dress? The mother of serial killer Henry Lee Lucas. " This isn't conflating a boy in a dress to serial killers. It's drawing a connection between being forced to wear a dress, and serial killers. As I've shown, there's a link between child abuse and serial killers, this is a reasonable connection to draw. What is this, /r/feminism? You know they don't care about stats and science. I'm fine with feminism. It's absolutely still needed, as …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:26 PM
1

Wait, I'm confused. Are you now agreeing that it was abusive of the parent to force the kid to go to school in a dress? Have you changed your stance on this? If no and you've felt it was abusive all along, what has been your point all along? If no, you don't think it's abusive, then WTF? If yes you have changed your stance and now think this case was abusive, yay for progress and agreement!
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:01 PM
1

I don't know if there are studies on whether forcing kids to crossdress leads to trauma and should be considered abuse. I would definitely consider it abusive. It's quite likely to lead to bullying, and we can see in this case that it lead to the kid not wanting to go to school. Also, this is not the same as if it was the kid who wanted to wear a dress. There's nothing wrong with a boy wanting to wear non-traditional clothing. There's nothing wrong in having a more "feminine" appearance. Or if i…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:38 PM
2

Show me. If you can back your claims up, good (I’ve yet to see any literature showing it to be true). That's because you haven't looked. It's not as if this topic hasn't been extensively studied, or that the information is difficult to find. This was my number 2 Google search result with the search "murderers abuse childhood statistics". Number 1 was one of the actual studies mentioned, but I can't link you the PDF. And yes, the conclusion is that serial killers are significantly more likely to …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:13 PM
1

I think we both agree that children deserve at least some base level of economic security, no matter who their parents are. This might be what the current system tries to guarantee, but it's a poor system. It often traps guys who have no relation or interest in the child, it sends people to what are practically debtors prison, and in cases where both parents are struggling to get by, it doesn't even achieve the goal of providing economic security for the child. As a society, we should be able to…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:31 AM
2

Sure, it probably is. So why don't you pay for the child? You're as much related to it as that other guy is.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:47 PM
1

That's fine, we don't have to agree on everything. As long as we agree that cheating is kinda sucky.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 10:54 PM
1

Two things can both be bad without them being equally bad. Punching someone in the face is bad, shooting someone in the face is more bad. With cheating, both parties are engaged in behavior that is likely to destroy a relationship. That is bad. One party is also betraying the trust of someone they supposedly care about, and breaking their vows to each other. That makes it more bad.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 05:51 PM
2

All of this is about morality. Cheating may be scummy, but it's not illegal. As for who's more "morally responsible": only one of them had made a vow, and only one of them broke it. The other person may have helped, but let's not pretend this is equally on both people.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:07 PM
10

She's obviously accusing him of punching her in the face, because he punched her in the face. Is this the crime you're talking about? Because I'm not seeing anything in the article about her accusing him of anything before that.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:23 AM
1

It's nearly twice as common is USA.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:20 PM
1

Voting in the US and indeed most (all?) nations is basically "Who is going to harm me the least", not "who is going to improve things." This doesn't have to be the case. I live in a place where, at any given time, there's at least something like 8+ viable parties, each with several more or less respectable candidates. And they all get to have influence, in proportion to how many people voted for them. So I get to vote for people I actually like! Also, the political mudslinging is much less of an…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:20 AM
11

I really don't think just flipping the genders like this works. The situation for men and women isn't the same, and I don't think it's useful to pretend it is. Women do have a bunch of issues the need fixed, so do men, but these issues aren't just mirror images of each other! So for instance: "Don’t send pictures of your vagina unless he just asked for them." This is so rare, I'm not sure I've ever actually hear of unsolicited "clam pics". I'm sure it has happened, but it isn't a wide spread phe…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:29 PM
1

Humans are indeed troop based. Have you ever been to a school? it's pretty evident there. I have been to school, and it seems my experience there has been quite different to yours. At my school, there was not a bunch of warring troops, I would have no idea who any "alpha males" were, and I did not run around with a "crew". These seem to be cultural behaviors, not something innate to human nature. And that's exactly the point. We indeed can engage in chimpanzee-like behavior. We can also act in a…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:14 PM
2

Human nature is extremely close to ape nature, so watch any number of documentaries on those 2 subjects and you'll see what I mean. Which apes? Bonobos or chimpanzees? Those are our 2 closest evolutionary cousins, and their behavior is pretty remarkably different. Yet sexual and social behaviours are markedly different. The common chimpanzee has a troop culture based on beta males led by an alpha male, and highly complex social relationships. The bonobo, on the other hand, has egalitarian, nonvi…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:19 AM
2

It refers to Jewish people. It's literally some neo Nazi bullshit, and you should just go ahead and ignore every idiot who uses that triple parenthesis thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/17 01:15 PM
1

The wall has been made bigger because too many people were beating it. But if a woman isn't succeeding, we must make it easier for her! The solution wouldn't be to make the wall easier. That wouldn't fix anything, as you say it would just mean more people could beat it. Instead, an answer could be to make a different obstacle! The warped wall quite clearly favors height. As do many other obstacles. As men tend to be taller, far more men will have an easy time on those obstacles. But it might be …
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:04 AM
1

What? That picture says that roughly twice as many women than men experience abuse, both physical and emotional. That may not be a one-sided situation, but it's definitely not equal either.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:32 PM
1

The filmmakers had an infinite number of choices for who to replace Wolverine with, and for some reason they decided it should be a kickass woman. So, how are you envisioning this "infinite number of choices"? Looking at your description of the character they ended up with: "Kickass" is pretty much a given, without that you can't really claim it's got anything to do with Wolverine. That leaves us with the "woman" part, and well, we already have the male Wolverine. Now we're just left with the un…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:08 PM
6

If a girl is dressed like a "slut" there is a very good chance she's looking for a hook up. That's not a crazy statement. Again though, the implication here is that a "hook up" = rape, but they didn't say rape or sexual assault or anything related to consent at all. This question, to me, seemed like it just wanted people to acknowledge "slut" as a valid term. So any answer other than "Strongly disagree" must clearly mean you think women sometimes dress like sluts, and therefore obviously deserve…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:50 PM
4

Then expand on it. Come up with idea for how you think it might be better. Personally, I think it's​ a fairly good to way to explain the idea. Although it could probably be shortened down a bit, there are a couple of redundant drawings.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:41 PM
8

Not everything needs a source. It's an attempt at visualising an idea, in order to better communicate. If you find the visualization usefully, then that's all the "information" it needs.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:14 PM
-1

Ohh sorry, seems I made a mistake in my comment. I meant to write that we could discuss whether it's fair that men's vote is tied to military service.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:49 AM
-2

Of course women should be allowed to vote. If we want to call our government a democracy, then that's a given. We could fairly discuss whether men's right to vote is tied to military service (I don't think it is). We can discuss whether the narrative that "women didn't get the vote until year x" is productive, or true. We can discuss whether the current voting ages are fair, and how to optimize the Democratic process. So, there are many good discussions to be had about voting rights. "Should wom…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 08:26 AM
1

USA sees around 20-30 school shootings a year. Meanwhile, Australia hasn't had one for more than a decade. Clearly there's more going on than just population size.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:53 AM
3

If women put in equal effort, then why do we not see an equal number of women represented as men are? Why is there SUCH a huge different in numbers? If women have put in equal effort but in fact not did not reap the benefits we have to ask why, we have to wonder what is stopping them. Because men and women are not identical. On average we pretty much are, but there is larger variability in men than in women. And I'm not just talking out of my ass here, theres research showing this. Which means t…
/r/PussyPass31/08/14 09:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter