TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ahostofeyelashes Archive

View 1 post and 90 comments by ahostofeyelashes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

ahostofeyelashes/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 03:06 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sorry, braiding my leg-hair, can't reply in depth at the mo'.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 06:26 PM
2

Are men and women different? Yes, i think they generally are. Specifically with respect to hormones and their role in behaviour, I think it would be very difficult to legitimately claim that humans are unaffected by hormones. All of this said, I take each individual on their own merits, male or female, and try not to make any assumptions about individual behaviour based only on sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 06:30 AM
2

Almost like these sexually expressive individuals are one big homogenous glob of insecurities! Except I acknowledged I could be completely wrong about them, especially on an individual basis. I don't babytalk in real life, in public, so I don't have access to what's going on in the heads of people who do. The thread linked to and being discussed is titled "Treating Women Like Children". What made you think women are children? That makes no sense. Are we going to play this game? Where you pretend…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 06:00 AM
3

which even she as a female is willing to acknowledge. Almost like we aren't all one big homogenous glob of female! I've come across baby-talkers before, and I agree with the woman in the video - it's really off-putting. It is a specific kind of woman who pulls this trick, and I'm fairly confident in saying it's the same type who tend to pull the finger-in-mouth silly-little-me act as well. You know what? Some men go for this. A lot of those baby-talkers probably have boyfriends who are the male …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 05:35 AM
3

I assume that women who do this do it in the interest of increasing their perceived femininity. Deep voices are considered masculine and softer, higher voices are considered feminine. Honestly, I can't think of any other reason a woman would put on a higher-than-usual tone of voice. That said, did you just present this - some women consciously choosing to change their natural tone of voice - as proof that women are mentally and emotionally children? That's a real question, not an accusation, I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 04:58 AM
1

Can you explain this a little further? Are you using the word "niceness" in a way that doesn't mean the same thing as "kindness"? As far as I know, kindness it not only a post-enlightenment virtue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/14 01:00 AM
15

This is one of those topics I'm a little surprised many people are even replying to seriously. I like debate and love to engage in it with those who hold different opinions to mine. There is, however, a line of sorts, beyond which I just find it futile to engage. For example, 9-11 truthers. OK, you believe George Bush did it. No, I won't be discussing it with you. Do you really, truly, in your hearts of hearts, believe women are forever immature/'children' and that emotional, mental and intellec…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 05:25 AM
1

I think some people (male and female) give good advice. I think some people (male and female) give bad advice. Good advice would be thoughtful. It would come from someone cognizant of a) avoiding giving advice based specifically based on what they look for in the other gender (i.e. assuming what attracts women to men is what attracts men to women in most cases - it isn't) and b)knowing the person you're advising - what they're looking for, what their strengths and weaknesses are etc. I don't bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 05:20 AM
1

I'd like to have a comment, but beyond "I COMPLETELY AGREE" I don't really have anything to add. It's actually amusing sometimes how similiar both sides are and how vehemently they'll disagree with that opinion. Both sides are pretty intolerant of anyone who doesn't toe their specific line(s) and both sides spend a lot of their energy epitomizing the word 'hamstering'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 10:59 PM
0

Yeah, I won't shame anyone for who/what they're attracted to, because the vast majority of us have no control over it. Nor do I agree that beauty is mostly cultural (as someone has posited below). Across cultures and across history the appearance of health and youth has generally been considered attractive. This isn't to say there aren't trends - the 3 Graces were definitely more rounded in the past, but neither obesity nor extreme thinness have ever been attractive to anyone outside of those wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 10:52 PM
2

That's not homophobia. That's disdaining a high partner count, regardless of the sex of the partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 06:16 PM
19

I lurked here (may have posted a few times, can't remember) when I first found out about it, but I just don't like the atmosphere very much. There's a kind of irony in a group of women eager to fulfill and express their femininity being so harsh and rigid with others, especially new people who often seem to be seeking advice here specifically because they don't want the standard Blue Pill spiel. If there's tension in a longterm relationship, it usually involves both people and is the responsibli…
/r/RedPillWomen11/02/14 07:32 AM
2

I took this: "That's why groups are rational" as an 'all groups are always rational statement'. It seems I was wrong, I accept that. It is sometimes difficult to make yourself understood in text-only discussions. I don't think all TRPers (or all BPers) are nutballs, either. I accept that most people on both sides are probably doing/believing what they do/believe in good faith and the belief that they are making things better. Nutballs. Nutballs. NUTBALLS.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 06:01 PM
1

I believe you. I should have been very clear and I wasn't: I don't think ALL BPers reject the idea that women can be abusers and men can be abused, but quite a few do - I have talked to them and know some of them (my social group is mainly composed of white, middle-class, educated people). The people who reported me to my advisor were highly educated grad students. When my academic advisor declined to punish me I was thrown out of the group for being 'male-identified' and 'brainwashed' and a psy…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 05:57 PM
2

I don't accept that because some non-nutballs in some groups can overwhelm the nutballs that this automatically = groups are rational. The latter is too certain a statement for me to be laying on a foundation that owes a fair amount to chance. And now I have said 'nutballs' way too many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 05:05 AM
7

This is one of the main reasons I reject BP thinking. They are not able to deal with the reality that men can be abuse victims and that women can be abusers, manipulators and liars. I was reported to my academic advisor for stating as much in a group discussion at university (nothing came of it but it was a pretty big wakeup call).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 05:03 AM
2

Jury trial, but that isn't because I think juries, because they're groups of persons, are rational. I believe my chances are better with a jury than with a single judge, because hopefully at least one of them is sensible and could help put a damper on any nutballs. That's just a hope, though. If I knew who the judge was, I may choose the judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 01:32 AM
2

Both groups utterly failed to achieve their goals, though - western Europe is currently a group of liberal democracies and last time I checked the US was not an apartheid state with whites at the top. I don't know why anyone would assume that groups of human beings usually tend towards rationality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/14 05:36 PM
1

I think Steven Davis is the man who wrote the paper in the early 00's on his theory that a principle of 'least harm; would actually lead us to consuming meat/not being vegetarian. I found this link: https://www.morehouse.edu/facstaff/nnobis/papers/Davis-LeastHarm.htm Not sure if that link mentions it but someone published a rebuttal after Davis's paper was published and if you're interested it should be easy to Google. Also wanted to agree with the person above saying butter is now your friend. …
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/14 10:22 AM
4

Yeah I reread my reply to you and realized it sounded like I was somehow countering a statement you didn't make (i.e. you did not mention male roles in pre-industrial societies, nor were they at issue). I just brought it up more as a response to those who DO think men somehow had it good back then. Because they didn't. No one did. As for the can't think critically, man, I just can't with that. Mostly I think they're just trying to provoke a response. But if I met a man who really, genuinely thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/14 05:21 AM
12

I'll comment in parts: If people want to go back and live in a pre-industrial manner then they can do so. BOTH sexes worked themselves to the bone from dawn to dusk. You described general female responsibilities, but men weren't sitting around in the yard having beers (some of them do seem to think this is how it was) - they were doing backbreaking work, usually agricultural labour, ALL day. If a man failed at tending his crops, his family might die. No sane person who wants a life of ease wants…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 05:42 PM
5

Yeah, i read your whole post. I couldn't tell if this: "This gives men an ever present power over women. Whatever power a women has in a relationship is granted to her by the man, and ultimately he could take it away at any time. In that sense, women will always be at a perpetual disadvantage in 1v1/relationship situations." was being applied to all male/female relationships or if it was only being applied to those in which the male is physically abusive. It seems like you're saying that men wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 05:28 PM
6

"This gives men an ever present power over women. Whatever power a women has in a relationship is granted to her by the man, and ultimately he could take it away at any time. In that sense, women will always be at a perpetual disadvantage in 1v1/relationship situations." Are you applying this to all male/female relationships? I'm female, have had a couple of serious relationships and have literally never felt this. Yes, both men were physically stronger than me, but no, I never felt physically t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 07:52 AM
5

Yeah, they need to stop trying to weasel out of this one. It is repeatedly stated and apparently very widely accepted on TRP that a man's love is superior (not just different - superior) to a woman's. It's dishonest for anyone familiar with TRP to say otherwise. They need to be able to stick by what they're actually saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 01:53 AM
0

Is that really stickied at the top of TRP? I suppose right now it's a movement in its extreme infancy and it's going to thrive or fail based on how it handles growth, but that sort of stuff at the very top just makes me think it'll flame out. I know that kind of hostility is commonplace in many subs on Reddit, but it isn't something that attracts reasonable people. In fact it does the opposite - it attracts extremists and they then make the place pretty unbearable for noobs who aren't extremists…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 01:49 AM
2

OK, I got ya. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 05:03 PM
6

Someone should post this in the Purple Pill debate sub. I'd be curious to see if there's anyone who would defend lowered standards for women - and if there is, what that defense would be. I'm a woman and have absolutely no problem with physical standards being the same for both sexes, regardless of how many women this may exclude.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 05:02 PM
3

Eh, I'm not male and I don't subscribe to any colored pills but just on this one issue I think you're mishandling it a little. She's trying to fuck with you. Whether or not she actually has slept with anyone* she's trying to mess with your head, plant a few doubts. And it's working because you're posting here. Why are you even hanging out with her today? You need to meet her attempts at emotional gameplaying with better, harder attempts of your own. *and if she's a 'plate' - does it matter? I th…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 04:59 PM
6

It might have been better to ask who thinks gender is a social construct, no? Either way, I don't believe gender is entirely a social construct. Or even mostly a social construct - in fact it's probably the opposite, imo. There will be sex differences between human beings that are based on those hormonal, physical etc. differences. I do believe that in general, women will be better nurturers of young children and men will be better warriors/soldiers. Does this mean I see it as black and white? T…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 04:41 PM
4

Do 'gendered slurs' exist? Well, yes, given the definition. Do I believe they're inherently damaging and therefore need banning? No. This isn't to say that I don't believe anyone who says their feelings have been hurt by a gendered slur, it's to say that I don't beileve hurt feelings are enough to warrant the banning of whole words. I basically believe certain people need to grow a thicker skin, in most of those situations. I also want to say that someone who goes through life routinely employin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 04:26 PM
2

Every adult human being is solely responsible for what they think and believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/14 01:15 AM
2

I highly doubt that a single Red Pill mind would be changed if the Blue Pill sub ceased to exist and was wiped from their mental records. It isn't anyone's job to shepherd closed minds towards enlightenment, because most people are pretty convinced their own way is the enlightened way, and most of those people are wrong (this goes for both 'pills').
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/14 01:14 AM
14

What you're trying to do with many of your posts here (force certain Red Pillers to acknowledge the implications of what they're saying/believing, especially if/when it's taken to its logical conclusion) is not going to work. They can slip and slide like greased pigs when it comes to standing by what they've said. Case in point: the idea that game is amoral. That appears to be widely accepted and uncontroversial over there, but try to pin any of them down on it and they ooze away from their orig…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/14 01:03 AM
1

Don't disagree with you, either. I guess it depends on the definition of unicorn, too. If a unicorn is a person with no room for self-improvement (i.e. a flawless person) then yes, that person does not exist. The original post didn't bother me much because I took it as a bit of a gauntlet-thrown-down kind of thing. Obv. not everyone took it this way. But I don't disagree with you that quality people don't need to go around telling people of their quality. The context (internet thread, not social…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 11:18 PM
-1

Dude, you can't even spell the word you're using to tarnish half the human race!
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 10:27 PM
2

It's a theory of mine that this could be a partial explanation of the rarity of unicorns. They must have extremely high SMV and at the same time be almost completely unaware of it. Or at least unwilling to use it any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 10:05 PM
4

I definitely agree with most of this. The man I'm currently with ticks many of the Red Pill Man boxes, but he's never heard of TRP and would almost certainly react with strong skepticism and possibly even disbelief if I told him about it. What you're saying about unicorns smacks of truth, too, and I've often found myself smiling reading posts at TRP re: 'there are no unicorns' coming from someone who quite clearly limits his woman-meeting spaces to local clubs and bars (for example). No, I don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 10:00 PM
1

Yeah, I don't know too many people who think they're the literal perfect catch (unfortunately I have known a few, of both genders - they are generally insufferable and their belief that they're perfect is the thing that actually ends up negating all the genuinely positive traits they have, so i get what you're saying) but I guess I don't have a huge problem with someone being aware of their actual (i.e. not made up) advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 09:54 PM
4

I think basic human psychology explains a lot of the "that shit didn't happen" from both BP and RP people in response to the reports from the other side. A strong BP/RP person (i.e. someone who is personally and emotionally invested in the ideology being correct) is very possibly not going to deal well with anecdotes that go against their philosophy. Are some of these anecdotes embellished or outright made up? Sure, probably. But most of the reaction from the opposite side will be because people…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 09:50 PM
7

No need to be patronizing, I am aware of the meanings of the words I'm using. So it seems that you believe the 'game is amoral' statement is NOT a core red pill belief? I'm not blue pill or red pill, my belief that 'game is amoral' apparently is a red pill tenet comes from reading the posts on TRP itself. TRP lacks an arbiter to come down from above and say one way or another, so I'm just going on what I've read.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 03:44 AM
5

Presenting a theoretical situation for debate =/= condoning that situation. OP has repeatedly said in this thread that s/he would specifically NOT engage in this behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 03:17 AM
2

I don't really disagree with anything you've said here, aside from soem minor stuff (i.e. I don't think shit-testing is always inherently bad, and I think both sexes do it). As for TRP as a place where men can educate themselves about ID-ing shit-tests and passing them, I am all for that. I've said this in other places but i firmly believe both sexes have the right to learn about the opposite sex and use that info in their dating lives. I would encourage anyone having trouble dealing with dating…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 03:13 AM
3

I'm not bluepill, I'm not offended by the concept of unicorns, nor am I bothered by men who do or do not believe in them. I hadn't even heard the term before I found TRP a few weeks ago. Please don't make assumptions about what I believe or think. And I would STILL like to have the discussion about alphas and unicorns, but my chances of having it on Reddit don't look good. I will say that it does bother me when a group presents itself as something it isn't - the modding at TRP is heavy handed, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 02:56 AM
4

Yes, she is. Idea: 'game' is amoral. If you hang out at TRP you will have seen this repeated many times - I only found the sub a few weeks ago and have already seen it pop up a lot. It seems to be a fairly uncontroversial belief over there. The only way in which this could not be a No True Scotsman scenario is if TRP philosophy rejects 'game is amoral'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 02:32 AM
4

ITA that these brain studies are used to support arguments far beyond what the science has actually indicated. The funny thing is, both sides will at times use the same study to justify their ideology. I've literally been witness to Red Pill types using studies such as the above to say "it's biologically determined based on this study" and Blue Piller types saying "it's socialization, based on these studies." That brings 2 things to mind: Observing differences in the brain doesn't necessarily sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 02:12 AM
3

This is the poem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Knight_in_the_Panther%27s_Skin The line is something like "the host of her eyelashes was slaying him" depending on translation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 10:02 PM
2

And rightly so, because fuck dead horses and their bullshit. :) Thanks, btw, the username is taken from a line from a Georgian (country not state) epic poem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 06:20 PM
4

"If we can agree that sexual strategy is amoral, are there any ethical or moral problems to out-manoeuvring a guy who declares himself a red pill man?" No. If one subscribes to amorality for themselves then they subscribe to it (or, at least, create a situation in which reciprocal amorality is implicitly ok) in those they deal with, whether or not they're conscious of this or would state as much. If the rule is 'all's fair' then damnit, all's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:48 PM
8

This is most definitely a No True Scotsman scenario, and a textbook one at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:40 PM
1

Well, alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:33 PM
3

OK. I thought it might be something to do with a FFM threesome and the, uh, 'horn'.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:33 PM
1

I shouldn't have to read the articles, you should be able to clearly and briefly articulate your position. Also "motives, actions and thinking are far more biologically deterministic than generally accepted" isn't something I would necessarily disagree with. But is is NOT "motives, actions and thinking are always biologically determined," which is what you've been presenting here throughout. When it comes to scientific theories, I specifically don't 'choose' to believe things based on how I feel…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 05:32 PM
4

Yes. If I find my man-unicorn I plan to immediately murder and eat him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:28 PM
1

I'm fine with this - as I said, I acknowledge that everyone, of both sexes, is going to have a slightly different and personalized version of their unicorn. Again, fine with this opinion. I would say that shit-testing is/can be a test for pushoverdom, for sure, but it can also be a test for not-pushoverdom, if you get me. And yes, it is also something both sexes engage in, in their own ways. For me shit-testing (the term bothers me a little because it implies an always-negative, which I don't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:22 PM
2

I do not know (and am now slightly frightened by) what the threesome definition of a unicorn is...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:05 PM
1

Why would I engage in debate with you? Even within this brief internet comment thread you've not once clearly articulated your theories, nor have you shown any willingness to open your mind to the possibility that you might be wrong. You might be, you know. So might I. The point is coming into a debate 100% certain of your own correctness generally leads to a crappy debate that is not intellectually serious or strenuous for anyone. I asked you to flesh out your theory and you've basically presen…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 04:59 PM
2

I'm female and not a Red Piller (or a Blue Piller, FWIW) so take this with a grain of salt but as far as I can tell a 'unicorn' as spoken of in TRP is the perfect woman - she would generally be young, physically attractive, feminine in presentation and character. There appears to be some debate over whether or not this unicorn actually exists. It also, from what I've read, seems to be the case that a real unicorn would necessarily not realize she's a unicorn (because realizing her SMV would lead…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 04:48 PM
5

I wasn't here asking for advice. It isn't that I across the board oppose strong tone, it's that I don't see the point in chastising someone who came here for help. She didn't come in here combative, looking for a fight, trying to criticise RPW. If that's how newbs interested in TRP are treated that's the choice of the few posters who make up most of the activity on this sub, I just don't happen to think it's useful. On that note, I was happy to have found TRPW at first, until I read through quit…
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/14 04:43 PM
-1

Yeah, I got that from your post. I don't agree with the above poster who chastised you for coming here to vent - actually I think the anonymous internet is probably the very best place to do so - no one in this thread is socializing with you two irl! Best of luck. :)
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/14 03:13 AM
1

In an overall sense do you feel he spends enough time with her? If so, perhaps you can overlook this incident or others like it. The fact that she is crying for her Daddy doesn't mean much on a one-time basis because that's what 3 year olds do. If this is a pettern of behaviour, though, if you feel he doesn't spend enough time with her overall, perhaps that's a larger issue. I'm glad her took her to feed the ducks!
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/14 02:28 AM
6

You're being pretty patronizing here. Not everyone is a perfect RPW (as the definition has been laid out in this sub) and by nature I feel that a lot of women who are curious may be coming here to ask questions and look for tips. The poster may not be a perfect wife in your estimation but I highly doubt anyone is a perfect spouse by the specific definitions of others. Voicing differing opinions is fine but I don't think the scolding tone was necessary here.
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/14 02:23 AM
1

I just see it as the OP isn't trying to date respondents to her thread, she's trying to begin a discussion. She wasn't trying to demonstrate her unicorn-ness to anyone beyond the specific issues she was raising (i.e. she was looking for a good-faith convo), and even said herself that whether or not she is actually a unicorn is irrelevant (which it is, in terms of a useful discussion). The responses are legit, I'm not accusing anyone of being 'wrong' I would just personally prefer an actual argum…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 11:30 PM
2

How am I wasting his time? Theoretically that interaction ends in minutes/seconds - he approaches, I let him know I'm not interested, he is off to find someone else. That is the quickest, simplest way for it to go and I prefer it to being straight-up mean. As for OP, I meant what I said, I thought her post was interesting and could have been even more interesting if the discussion following it had gone differently. People got their backs up at her post and she got her back up at their responses.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 11:06 PM
1

Re: 'alpha' not being (or, not entirely being) a set of behaviours and attitudes. I mostly agree with this. It also depends on what woman is being sought - if the goal for a man is pussy, any pussy will do, then I think there are places to go and women to approach who won't need very much 'game' at all. I go back and forth on whether or not alphas are born or made. And as I said I agree that a certain skillset does not an alpha make. The alpha men I have known were effortlessly themselves and th…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 10:55 PM
2

I shit-test guys I want to go further with. From me, the "I have a boyfriend" is not a shit-test because I only use that when I'm really not interested in going any further/wasting both of our time giving him the idea I might be interested. As for the second part, I just saw some combativeness from both sides. I would like for that to be OK, I don't mind combat and I find it can be very useful at times. If the OP truly is a bitch/not worth it, it would have been more interesting to see it play o…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 10:39 PM
3

Why? So you can twist it into your framework in the same way a feminist would say "well X is just because socialization"? The burden of proof is on you in this thread - YOU have to prove what you're claiming and you haven't, you basically got eaten alive by people with a much better understanding of the issues here. If you truly want to get into this, if you want examples etc., I'm going to need you to spell out, in detail, your theory on biological motivations and why you think they are always …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 10:19 PM
3

I would love to be able to have the discussion your post seemed to be wishing for, OP. The fact that the majority of the responses here boil down to 'you're a bitch, not a unicorn' with some attempts at negging thrown in isn't a surprise. This is the internet and we're all strangers, no one is trying to bang or marry anyone else on this sub - nonetheless a real, good-faith conversation seems to be a bit of a unicorn itself. The concept of alpha is an interesting one, especially in light of this …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 10:05 PM
3

Aaaand you have no argument to present (to reiterate: repeating an original statement =/= successfully defending that statement). And stop - seriously, just STOP with the 'souls' talk that you're now throwing out in this thread. It's a red herring and you know it (or actually, you don't know it, which is even worse). Saying human beings are capable of transcending their biology in no way implies belief in a separate 'soul'. Also maybe look up the word 'transcend' in the dictionary. I'm not entir…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 06:20 PM
3

Oh dear. Pssst. "Sophomoric" is a very common, standard term used to describe someone's arguments if said arguments are seen as shallowly thought out and wildly certain beyond all reason.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 06:14 PM
3

You're just repeating your statements - that isn't proof. Do you realize that very serious, intelligent people who have spent their lives studying (for example) neuroscience as it pertains to human emotion would never make enormous, blanket statements along the lines of the ones you're making? That isn't an appeal to authority, you don't have to accept that they are correct and you are not based on their qualifications only but doesn't it even give you pause? No doubts at all?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 06:07 PM
4

"Biology is really really important and influential in human life, but it is not the only thing that exists in the universe." This is the truth. The idea that biology has absolutely nothing to do with human behaviour is as blinkered as the idea that biology is the sole factor in all human behaviour. The time spent on arguing with people on either side of the absolutist coin is disheartening at times. No serious person, imo, would subscribe to either ideology.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 05:58 PM
3

"There is nothing outside of biology." How do you know this? What arguments would you offer up to someone that aren't insults or personal opinions?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/13 05:54 PM
1

Your posting quotes from people who did not want women to have the right to vote (be they male or female) in no way proves that women's suffrage was/is a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/13 10:44 PM
1

Dude. I see what you're saying and don't think you're entirely wrong. I.e. the signs at feminist rallies saying "women are the new ni**ers" (not printing out the word because unsure if mods on this sub would object and am genuinely interested in debate) etc. I definitely think mainstream feminism has some racial issues. But it should be OK to make a comparison in terms of "some members of TRP see women as subhuman" and "some white people see black people as subhuman." One doesn't have to believe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/13 10:34 PM
22

My New Year's Resolution? Keep his balls even emptier, his belly even fuller and his smile even bigger, if at all possible.
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/13 09:14 PM
1

This is your typical Daily Mail watering down of other, more in-depth articles. I'm not opposed to it because it gets it out there to people who would otherwise not see it but yes, this is mostly a rehash of the recently posted Time article. Which was itself, IIRC, only the intro to a longer speech she gave.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 09:08 PM
1

By single mothers acknowledging that male role models are very important for boys and taking action based on that, making sure her sons have good men involved in their lives.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 09:05 PM
9

Camille Paglia has taken more shit and more nasty labels than almost any other serious modern public thinker I can call to mind. She brushes it off as the ideological whining it is, which is the only correct response.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 09:03 PM
4

If you define a feminist as someone who claims you are a rapist/murderer/abuser based solely on what exists between your legs, then no, you have no obligation to respect that person or their opinions. I'm not being tricky with words or definitions here, either, I know misandry exists in many feminist circles. Nobody owes bigots tolerance. That goes both/all ways.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 08:52 PM
6

Get your shit together. I do not say that unkindly. You're posting for hair advice, I get that, but the rest of your story tells me you might have more important issues to deal with than your hair. Get yourself sorted out as your number one priority. You might want to take the hair question over to one of the beauty subs - lots of helpful advice there. I wouldn't bother with extensions unless you can afford the proper ones. You hair will grow back, faster than it probably seems right now. In the…
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 09:05 PM
2

Oh you CAN group either or both sexes that way, I just don't think it's correct to do so. I also believe that men who think all women are sluts and women who think all men are bastard players ultimately hurt themselves more than they hurt any random member of the opposite sex they loathe so much. Nor do I think "instinctual responses" are necessarily something to be "treated or changed". Instinct exists and it needs to be acknowledged. That does mean we are all slaves to our instincts 100% of th…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 08:25 PM
3

Ah, so a kind of guilty until proven innocent thing? I get it. It isn't how I choose to interact with other human beings, myself.
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 07:52 PM
2

That's where I'm headed next. [insert insanity wolf] Seriously, though, as a woman this sub bums me out sometimes. Is there a middle ground between "all men are bastards" and "all women are whores"?
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 07:50 PM
2

"most polar bears" "all other people" Which is it - most or all? Because they're not the same. This hinges on "representative," too. Who is defining this representative group and how? As a general rule, yes I agree that you can glean pertinent info about an individual member of a species based on a representative group of that species. That said, human beings are more mentally and psychologically complex than polar bears and one always needs to be careful when extrapolating from 'some' to 'all' …
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 06:38 AM
3

Isn't that the difference between "all women will do X" and "some women will do X" (or even "most women will do X")? The women here are telling you that they would not cheat on their husbands/SOs. Is there no room in TRP philosophy for them? Is it an automatic assumption that they're lying, either knowingly or unknowingly? Believing in female hypergamy as a general trait isn't the same thing as believing in it in every single case, is it? This group is self-selecting, they have joined this sub s…
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 06:28 AM
3

OK. Is the poster above offering any new information (re: her claims never to have cheated/not to have cheating in her nature - claims I will believe a)for the sake of the argument and b)because I have no reason not to, given that I don't know her)? Do you believe that it is in the nature of every woman to cheat? I'm wondering if you truly are open to new info or if you may be dismissing it based on it clashing with the Redpill beliefs you've referenced above. A loy of the women in this thread a…
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 05:14 AM
2

How confident are you, on a 1-10 scale (1 being not at all, 10 being completely) that the worldview espoused in the Redpill sub is absolute truth?
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 04:09 AM
2

I think you know the dictionary definition of "judging," right? Are you trying to differentiate between judging that's legit and judging that isn't? That's going to be almost impossible to answer because the legitimacy is going to be different in the eye of the judger and the judgee in most cases. As for your ex it sounds like she was just using it as a fairly meaningless figure of speech. It's possible it was her expressing her unconscious desire not to be judged for the bad parts of herself bu…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 03:59 AM
4

According to Redpill thinking, yes. Just be careful about the parts of the Redpill thinking that, like the Bluepill thinking on the other side of the coin, see the opposite sex as a single entity. A lot of people here think it is a foregone conclusion that women are basically animals with no control over their animal nature. A lot of Bluepillers think men are basically animals with no control over their animal nature. Neither is necessarily true on an individual basis. A woman (or man) who loves…
/r/RedPillWomen28/12/13 02:26 AM
11

Can I offer a differing and female perspective on your idea that the OP (or any given woman) is using sex as bait or as a "bargaining chip"? First of all, do women do this? Yes, some do, and I am not claiming otherwise. There is another possibility that makes sense, though. Many women view sex differently to men. We just do. Sex, especially sex outside of a committed relationship, is often an emotionally fraught/vulnerable experience for us. The OP seems to be choosing not to have sex with this …
/r/RedPillWomen23/12/13 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter