TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ahundreddots Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by ahundreddots on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I'm not sure how your outlook for the next couple of years is "very profitable." Aren't all movie theaters closed for the forseeable future?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 07:11 AM
31

That's all you've got? *yeah *I'm *threw *we're *out
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 07:05 AM
7

It ain't over.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/17 12:07 AM
0

Okay, all other matters aside, why do you care? About mutilated dicks, I mean. I've never ever heard of a circumcised male complaining about his dick. It's not like we're being silenced -- we literally don't care at all. Why the concern?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:29 AM
0

I read the whole article, and my preceding comments stand. You don't care about the percentage of incidence where female genital mutilation includes removal of the glans -- you only care that the term "male genital mutilation" be equated with clitoridectomy. All of your arguments point toward this assertion. It is false. You deferring to the authority of being an Oxford scholar only makes your argument less compelling. I didn't call that author scientifically illiterate; I called you scientifica…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:19 AM
0

You think that men's genitals, viewed in terms of kilograms of flesh, are comparable and equivalent to women's genitals. That doesn't make you an egalitarian; it makes you scientifically illiterate. Which brings us to the main point: this isn't about kilograms of flesh. It's about intent. Nobody is sawing off foreskin to minimize male sexual response among their progeny or otherwise. Oh! My family forgot they weren't Jewish and now my dick lasts longer on the shelf! What a miserable destiny they…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:43 AM
0

Look at the goalposts in this article's premise: Female circumcision isn't always harmful; male circumcision isn't always harmless. As a male, I'll take those odds any day.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:25 AM
1

Female mutilation is removal of the glans from the female genitalia. By the number of nerve endings, it's well over half of the clitoral network, which is central to a woman's ability to attain orgasm. My erstwhile foreskin, on the other hand, was apparently an express lane to premature ejaculation. If your description is to be taken seriously, I'm glad to be rid of it. To be clear, I have a mutilated, circumcised dick that comes every time it's called. Sorry, but I am far from being deprived. B…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:14 AM
-1

Your reply reads like point-by-point replies to questions I didn't ask, so please forgive my frustration with it. I can bear your argument that decreased friction is a recipient-friendly feature of the natural male anatomy, where this is true. But increased sensitivity precipitating greater control of sensory responses does not follow logically, and even if it did, it still seems that prolonging sexual contact would be reduced to task management rather than natural response. So you have succeede…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:58 PM
-1

To be fair, it looks like something you copied and pasted, rather than something you wrote for the occasion of replying to a downvoted comment. So the same way you didn't care enough to write it, it doesn't really deserve to be read. But I did read the whole thing and I'm curious. Your description of the natural purpose of the foreskin essentially sounds like it jacks a dude off while he's fucking someone else. First, as a dude, that sounds pretty weak, like putting more of myself in the way of …
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter