TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aidrocsid Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by aidrocsid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

aidrocsid/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Look, I don't like them either, but this is wrong. The direction you guys are taking the sub in is kind of fucking ridiculous. If you ban people for what subs they're subscribed to you're no better than SRS. Are you going to ban me because I'm subbed to /r/kotakuinaction? Should you be banned because you're posting here?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:17 PM
-1

I can go to a public area wearing just about whatever I want (as long as I have underwear on) and people won't really make assumptions about me. They won't say it's for attention, or that I'm a slut, or any of that, it would just be funny. Sure they will. Go out in public wearing a skirt or makeup. You may get killed. It's certainly true that things are different for men and women in our society, and that those differences often favor men, but it's not entirely one-sided. I mean, I basically agr…
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/13 11:59 AM
1

MR is also a specifically anti-feminist arm of the men's movement.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:00 PM
6

So wait, because they aired the video it's not real? Or?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:26 PM
5

Ever seen one done? It's nothing like a tumor removal. You put adults under when you cut them open. Check out the Penn & Teller's Bullshit episode about it, they show a video. It's gruesome.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:13 PM
0

I added things to it. Don't reply so quickly and you won't catch people while they're still editing.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:44 PM
-1

Clout? Who? Dworkin? Laurelai? RobotAnna? Are you kidding me? SRS is little more than women's studies students and basement dwellers. It would be far more constructive to establish a space for men that doesn't alienate half of them. And you haven't addressed a word of the macho strutting shit. Am I to understand that you agree with that portion? Did you even read the bulk of the post?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:37 PM
2

Nice false dichotomy, but I didn't say to be passive. I said not to get into slapfights with radfems on the internet. That's not the same thing as being passive. I said to know when you're in an intractable argument and not to bother fighting with ideologues over nothing. If you want to go argue with some misandrist congress member to get a law changed, do it up. Having a protest and somebody's spewing some shit in your face? Great, get mad. Looking for angry radfems on reddit everywhere you can…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:26 PM
2

It's not about the neighbors, it's about the potential house mates.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:15 PM
-1

Sure, but by making it clear that you embrace those issues you do a world of good for your public image. That doesn't just matter in regard to being taken seriously by people who aren't considering direct involvement, but it makes it a more hospitable environment for men who are trying to sort out how their gender impacts their life.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:15 PM
3

Hi. I'm a victim of domestic abuse. I didn't say anything like that.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:12 PM
3

Also, we call the boy who's afraid of homosexuals and lets it affect his behavior an asshole.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:07 PM
70

Yeah, you reinforce that misandristic macho no feelings crap avoiceformen. That's exactly what we need.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:48 PM
0

Third wave is about egalitarianism, people are just shit at it. These angry social justice bloggers and SRS types aren't third wave feminists, they're regressive radicals.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:53 AM
1

No because the draft, divorce laws, circumcision, and forced masculinity aren't institutional.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:50 AM
1

That's true. On the other hand, she's also the drunk girl they kicked out of the bathroom. I don't know if strip clubs are a little more understanding, but most businesses don't take terribly kindly to that.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:03 PM
1

Good luck proving prostitution.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:36 PM
1

Probably not, since it says in the police report that she can't identify them.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:36 PM
2

You kill little people's puppies? Are dwarfs more likely to request that a pet be put down than the general public?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:42 AM
1

To be fair, small numbers of wikipedia mods sometimes take up pet issues and monitor those pages. I used to work with a flash animation community that had produced thousands of cartoons, but a few mods decided we "weren't notable enough" and deleted our page every time someone put it up.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:32 PM
1

a valuable addition to this sub-reddit. Yeah for SRS.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:22 PM
2

Go back to SRS.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:21 PM
-1

You're just as bad as the worst of them.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:22 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:01 AM
6

Why are you giving SRS fodder?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:16 PM
2

Feminists don't generally do men's advocacy. Chris Brown is a fucking asshole and that needs to be made clear. That's their job.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:31 PM
4

You realize they're doing that to elicit a negative reaction that will make Men's Rights look bad, right? The best thing to do is ignore them.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:27 PM
1

It's not irrelevant, it's a problem that we need to work the kinks out of.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:17 PM
-13

Finally we try to find equality in a world that has given men the legal disadvantage across the board. This sort of language on both sides is not helpful. Don't turn advocacy into a pissing contest.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:14 PM
1

No, I just think it's bullshit. Hell, the fucking author says it's damaging to your ability to form real relationships because you're fucking up all you unconscious compatibility cues. That part I agree with, also because it makes you look like a fucking prat.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:59 PM
3

I've actually read the book.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:52 AM
5

There's a difference between understanding women and taking advice from a fucking pathetic subculture.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:38 AM
2

So he's just supposed to spend his entire life never going after anything because maybe he might offend someone? I'm sorry but fuck that.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:32 AM
6

Oh fuck you. That shit makes us all look like jerks.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:42 PM
1

Well yeah, you should use tact if you actually want people to take you seriously. Do you plan to actually wage a war on people who don't agree with you?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:17 PM
6

I never said I thought it was justified, I don't. However, clearly there was an incompatibility that was addressed in the past but covered up rather than ironed out. I don't think it's reasonable to have such strong hang-ups about porn, but he knew she had them. My practical suggestion for the future is to not try to cover up incompatibilities. I offer it because it's the best I've got, not being a lawyer. The question was legitimately a question. Also, please stop delegitimizing men's advocacy …
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:35 PM
3

It is. Strict gender roles and sex-negative cultural values are a losing equation for everyone. It's unfortunate that these groups advocating for each gender wind up at each other's throats so often, rather than coming together and cooperating. When you set two groups against one another they will generally stick with their own and demonize their opponents. That which allows for our survival become that which limits our development. Even that posturing asshole is like that because its the only w…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:22 PM
1

There is no 1% willing to suddenly change their mind that their hilarious racist joke was offensive. I've never seen it and I doubt you have. Change doesn't happen immediately. You almost never will have a debate about something with someone and change their entire world-view at that moment, but you may very well plant a seed that leads them to doubt their views. It's not just downvotes though, and it's not just against people who are actually being jerks. It's against the entire category they'r…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:13 PM
4

Appropriateness is not objective, and determining what you deem to be appropriate is part of testing compatibility, whether consciously or unconsciously. What you seem to be expressing is that the kind of woman the guy hitting on girls at the gym is looking for is not you, and that's fine. That girl does exist though. People meet in all kinds of places, especially those that bring together people who share an interest. I'm sure a lot of the guys who hit on girls in gyms are flexing macho meat-he…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:51 PM
3

While I certainly agree that not everyone wants to be hit on in everyday situations, there's really no reason that should have an impact on men attempting to pursue relationships. Nobody is psychic, we can't tell whether you want to be approached or not, and guys who assume that nobody ever wants to be hit on tend to be alone. You might want to check your privilege when it comes to romantic social interactions.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:13 PM
1

It's not just refusing to tolerate men who make rape jokes, though. Men who didn't do those things aren't just magically missed by the intended effect of the joke. When you talk shit about an entire gender you offend an entire gender.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:00 PM
4

Men make comments to women that they're attracted to because they're expected to do all the foot work if anything's going to get off the ground. Until men feel that attractive women will approach them if they're interested, they're going to make comments, because not everyone can be smooth.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:46 PM
7

Women most certainly are entitled to dress however they want, just as men do. What they're not entitled to is living in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:40 PM
18

Next time don't bother lying about shit, it always comes out. Do you think she would have reacted as badly if you'd taken a hard-line on the porn a few years ago?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 03:36 PM
1

A single case doesn't constitute evidence of a trend.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 02:44 AM
2

Instead of the slut thing you get the creep thing, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:52 PM
0

Downvote for anecdotal non-evidence.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:40 PM
2

All your editorializing did was make me not want /r/mensrights posts showing up on my front page. Congratulations, I've unsubscribed.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:46 AM
1

Speculation doesn't really get us anywhere, but there's certainly nothing unexpected about human beings hiding the truth for any number of reasons.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:41 PM
1

I'm not talking about throwing out the entire methodology of surveying, I think it's incredibly valuable. There are, though, some things that people won't generally answer truthfully. I'm not sure how you would set up a metric for objectification that wasn't biased, either by the survey's writers or the respondents. Emotionally neutral facts are difficult enough. I honestly don't think the term objectification holds much in the way of fixed meaning.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:39 PM
1

You're missing the point.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:15 PM
4

I can't even get people to admit that they've had sex with more than one person in a year if I lump it together with other Hep B risk factors (sex with gay men, clotting factor concentrate, anal sex without a condom) and ask them if they've done any of them but not to tell me which one. They will, however, tell me exactly how many people they've had sex with in the past year if I ask them that question alone, even if they've already answered no to 2 or more and their answer is higher. Hell, half…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:07 PM
2

Yeah but you also said "This kinda stuff is why Mensrights gets laughed at and not considered legitimate". The reason that actually happens is that our society defaults to a mentality of men's rights as a non-issue.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:32 PM
1

So he's consistently misandristic despite his gender, yet fears attacks by feminists? What?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:04 PM
-1

How is that an argument for it not being demeaning to men?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 08:53 AM
1

It's from Daily Mail, there may very well never have been any proceedings.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 04:56 PM
1

Brilliant job with the affidavit.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 04:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter