Are you deliberately conflating sex and gender? Yes, male and female have consistent defintions. They are not synonyms of man and woman. I used the intersex example to show that your agument is inconssitent--it's not about chromosomes, it's about people moving outside their roles. Again, why do you care if someone has the "wrong" chromsomes? Do you think genders should be treated differently, and that someone going by the "wrong" gender is somehow cheating the system?
Unscientific garbage? You're the ones ignoring neuroscience. It's hilarious that you conflate a purely categorization issue ("what constitutes a woman?") with science. There isn't a scientific definition of what it means to be a man or a woman. It's a category, like what counts as a chair. You think that a necessary component of being a woman is having XX chromosones (although maybe not, since I don't see people like you arguing about androgen insensitives using the woman's washroom). Other peop…
"Scientific gender"? Are you purposefully mixing gender and sex in this thread, because you keep doing it over and over. You're obviously talking about chromosonal sex. We know. We get it. No one is saying transgender women have XX chromosones. But you're right, there is a scientific gender. It's talked about in psychology, not biology. And you're flat out wrong about what the scientific consensus is.
Nope, transphobia. Or for those that whine about the "phobia" part: they are bigoted against transgender people. They want a "scientific" excuse to say they are icky.
