TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ajax_on_rye Archive

View 6 posts and 85 comments by ajax_on_rye on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Testosterone and Cortisol. Great hormones that explain why men do high stakes projects well. We have the endochrine orchestration to succeed. Women can, but with less testosterone, it is far more stressful for them. Oh, and men want the status to get the best females, so there's breeding interest.
/r/MGTOW18/01/17 01:20 PM
1

Hmmmm, no. We are men and evolved to have sex with women. It is inconceivable that there isn't orchestration in the brain and endochrine system to drive this. Of course it may be adaptable or imprintable (I dig men, never bumped uglies with a female), but the sex drive and objects of female attraction are the overwhelming norm. On the other hand, beating one out .... you may have a point there.
/r/MGTOW18/01/17 01:08 PM
7

You are talking rubbish. The Oculus Rift on a high end PC is stunning. It is completely different to 20 years ago.
/r/MGTOW18/01/17 01:04 PM
1

And, if anyone is interested... 19/20th Dec, in London Goldsmiths college. http://loveandsexwithrobots.org
/r/MGTOW25/11/16 10:51 PM
14

The person behind the campaign looks like this: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n66LePSwYvk/Vfk9lQjga1I/AAAAAAAAUIQ/sSGg5Im1RN8/s1600/Kathleen_Richards_Sex_Robot.JPG
/r/MGTOW25/11/16 10:50 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/15/alt-right-manosphere-mainstream-politics-breitbart#comment-87530308
/r/MGTOW15/11/16 10:16 AM
1

Just wait till we make intelligent sex toys linked to neural networks in the cloud that can work out what would turn you on all by themselves. You ain't seen nothing yet.
/r/MGTOW08/11/16 10:41 PM
1

My personal favourite: I wanted too. That's the one I use, BTW.
/r/MGTOW01/11/16 06:39 PM
2

I'm so gonna use that.
/r/MGTOW15/10/16 11:08 PM
1

None taken. ive always found men are men, regardless of orientation. And men are captivated by beauty, appreciation and great sex, regardless of orientation. Thus, MGTOW is relevant to gay men in breaking out of being controlled by their dick, and getting to the point they are actually self actualising, [insert positive think buzzword selection here] people. I think someone mentioned azaleas. I only build robots and don't garden. You can fund my kickstarter after next if you want a robotic garde…
/r/MGTOW15/10/16 10:37 PM
1

No one here has any evidence this exchange actually took place.
/r/MGTOW13/10/16 05:23 PM
1

They are not 'so-called pride marches', that's their actual name, mate. That name comes from refuting shaming language like 'virgin', 'loser', 'small penis'.., oh wait, that language used against MGTOWS. Do I need to make my point clearer? the inside story is that the pride marches always had opposition from gay men who don't feel it was in anyway representative of them. Who don't do grinder, because they have better things to do... I have always argued, as a gay man who looks he is a serial kil…
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 10:07 PM
5

2002 was the last good edition.
/r/MGTOW28/09/16 12:28 AM
12

Poofs are your natural allies. Well, I am. I think it's great you guys are doing your own thing. I'm 'older' so back in my day (creaking of bones) coming out was essentially saying 'fuck you' to everyone, and carrying despite the shaming language. Takes balls, I can tell you. So I'm pleased for you guys.
/r/MGTOW28/09/16 12:20 AM
2

Good point. Coercion and intoxication?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/16 10:10 PM
1

A no today may not be a no tomorrow. The essence of the rape law is penis based. But asking repeatedly that the definition to be based around consent is perfectly reasonable. i have literally seen people on TV resort to the legal definition to claim that forced enveloping is not rape. Make the definition consent based and we can talk about the issue, not the legal definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/16 07:35 PM
1

A no today may not be a no tomorrow. The essence of the rape law is penis based. But asking repeatedly that the definition to be based around consent is perfectly reasonable. i have literally seen people on TV resort to the legal definition to claim that forced enveloping is not rape. Make the definition consent based and we can talk about the issue, not the legal definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/16 07:35 PM
1

Well, duh! Yould get helmet hair.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:24 PM
26

Ah diddums. Did acting like a bitch land you in trouble. Here, wipe your crocodile tears. No one cares, fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:00 PM
1

It's rhetorical and ironic. I was reading about why you don't send innocent people to prison. If virtue cannot protect you why be virtuous?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:54 PM
2

Rabid Feminists: a feminist who tries to change the dictionary definition of 'rabid feminist'
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:06 PM
2

So a violent, abusive spouse has a range of tricks; whining, wheedling, begging, threatening self-harm, compliments and pseudo-dependency. They aren't gendered techniques, all abusers use this if they are threatened with losing their victim. These people do attempt suicide when the victim/partner leaves. It is never serious (but some do die as they really do want that attention and guilt and are not competent enough to engineer a near miss). They nearly always go to hospital, because they need n…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:12 AM
12

I use the ladies when the gents is full, or some arsehole has missed the toilet and splattered all over the floor. At least in the ladies they just quietly passed out after shooting up. ... I should probably go to a better class of dive bar.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:47 PM
2

Ha! I think I understand. Maybe.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:52 PM
1

What's a baller?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:26 PM
1

Boo-hoo. She was happy to shout him down, demand the camera be taken off him, and act like a self-righteous, injured prig. And now issues a non-apology while admitting she's wrong. Delicate, special little snow fucking flake.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 10:13 PM
32

Thunderf00t on YouTube gives Anita (and others) a roasting on this subject.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:01 PM
13

Q: "How much spunk to get that mohawk to stand up?" A: "More than you've got, twinkle toes" Easy.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 10:18 AM
1

Seriously? If you look at the components of sentences there are 'punishment', 'public protection' and 'example of' aspects. Of these I only consider punishment as a good/valid reason for sending someone to prison. The public protection component is a punishment for a crime not yet committed. It may be a valid concern, but its causes incarceration for something that might not happen. For those cases it could be argued that they need hospital or a relatively benign environment. In my head I am thi…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:10 PM
1

She's been suspended from her job. Yay!
/r/MensRights22/01/16 11:38 PM
2

What strikes me is how few people are signing.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:01 PM
9

You know, I have no idea how I can put this on Facebook without looking like a complete cunt. EDIT: I mean, because 'the narrative' is so fucking awful'...
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:56 PM
2

In this case, I completely agree, I was being flippant before. This woman got away with a lot of shit, and the book should have been thrown at her to make an example out of here. being small, weak (female), blah, blah, blah, doesn't give you rights to be a fucking asshole. ... obviously. Sorry is my flip attitude gave the impression that I don't think she's appalling.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:42 PM
14

People (men) get sent to jail for longer to be made an example of so others will be deterred. So fucking someone up disproportionately is already part of doctrine. Why not fuck this one up? Petite, delicate, great future ahead...destroy her. Nthey would if she were a he.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:05 PM
2

Interestingly, if a lot of real rapes go unreported, then the proportion of false rape claims goes up. Just saying.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:59 PM
1

So wiki or google lazy bones. The FBI excluded 20% of the people named by the accusers on DNA evidence 20% of the time. Another 20% of tests were inconclusive, 20% of 20%~ 4%, 20%+4%= about 1/4 are false Where sex was consensual and everyone admits it.., take your pick. As women aren't punished for false rape accusations is gonna be high. I think 40% seems fair. There are just so many reasons to accuse someone of rape, including cockholding your BF/hubby. 16% of kids are not biologically related…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:57 PM
1

The night is still young.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:47 PM
3

We all act like fools sometimes.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:36 PM
1

Ok, so this has pissed me off. And wondering what could be done, I'm wondering if the old guy could bring a case against the girlfriend because she was in part responsible. She has a home, is a first time buyer. I'm wondering if a no win no fee thing could happen, or some sort of charitable contribution, thing. I'll stump up cash.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:25 PM
1

Contempt of court?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:46 PM
2

Ok, that's a piece of evidence that she lied about the rape that she reported.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:43 PM
0

Next week: Nothing Next month: Nothing This year: during this year, International Mens Day will cause near riots on several campuses as Men's Human Rights Activists starts to get headlines and feminists and manginas leap forth. Very bloody scenes follow as some mad, bad woman blows Milo Yiannopolis to kingdom come. Luckily he has become a meme and was the first to benefit from being completely digitised and infects computers the world round. All around the world women give up on modern technolog…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:51 PM
23

Cases exist of men filming encounters with women, and thus being cleared of rape accusations. It seems that this is the only way to avoid false rape accusations, the threat of false accusations, and so on. Pity
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:21 PM
3

The so-called "pussy pass"
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:02 AM
7

Write to your MP about the lenient sentence. https://www.writetothem.com/ not that will do any good.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:50 PM
1

It's bollocks. I've worked in tech thirty years and seen nothing like it.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:57 PM
3

I would love to know if there was something she could be charged with (because I'm a bastard).
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:24 PM
2

Ignore her, look after yourself, move away. Never speak to her again. It'll be fine. For extra points... Leave a note "why do men die younger that women? Listen to yourself"
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:54 PM
13

I would like to see a "Don't Do Chivalry" campaign, "you could get hurt, get jailed or get dead, just over her hurt feelings". 'Let her sort it out herself'.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:17 PM
13

She gets off scot free, of course.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:42 PM
2

Well, actually, try Broken Rainbow. It's for LGBT people, but they'll help, they are used to make victims in ways others are not.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:48 AM
2

Try this on your mum. http://sciencenordic.com/cooperation-expense-society Women conspire more than men. Again, it's because mummy is a bad person and is projecting it on you. EDIT: :-)
/r/MensRights16/01/16 04:01 AM
2

If you infantilise your girlfriend she'll live in disabling fear forever, or end up hating men, blaming them for her fear. Huge, absolutely huge numbers of women don't spend their lives in fear, are happy to walk home, go to the shops, or what ever. So maybe the problem is not with men, women, feminism or you (I never said you were a piece of shit), maybe it's just with this person who happens to be your girlfriend. it's just a maybe.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:12 AM
10

Men are victims of violence all the time, most assaults, most homicides... The streets really are dangerous for us. And yet i don't live in fear. If your girlfriend really does live in fear all the time she has a problem with her risk analysis subroutines. Or she needs to become emotionally competent enough to handle her fear. You know, like an adult. Tell her that, it may be the first time she's been treated like a full grown adult with agency. It may help, but she'll probably call you a beast.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:36 PM
2

she believes there should be no 'male only' spaces because she thinks we are gathering together and conspiring to keep women in their places. I would literally say that she shouldn't judge all men by the whinge fest that is 'women only groups', when men get together we normally do something. like shoot zombies through the head.n we are not constantly attention seeking, looking for emotional validation or doing anything but chilling. Then stand back and enjoy the show.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:52 PM
1

Find photos of botched circumcisms, colour preferably, and show them to her. If you can find full on deformed cock pics due to circumcism show her those. Keep doing this... Remind her that when he grows up and realises she mutilated him, he may despise her. Remind her this isn't a required operation and could kill him. Find newspaper reports. Show them too her. If she still insists tell her she's a child abuser. Always bring the subject up when she's surrounded by friends. Always have the most g…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:14 PM
2

Can he bring a civil case against her? Where are the fucking police here?
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:52 PM
37

Lot's of items are repeated with slight rewording. So, not really usable in its current form.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:48 AM
1

I think you were getting there until you wrote 'culture'. These refugees (and there are a lot of genuine refugees there), have come from areas with real, literal multi-year war. War does involve complete breakdowns of norms, things that would never be acceptable become ... Well, doable. In this context, assuming a predisposition of violence and sexual assault from the source culture, and the desensitising effects of war, we could imagine that the correct response is to treat the displaced people…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:46 AM
1

I think you were getting there until you wrote 'culture'. These refugees (and there are a lot of genuine refugees there), have come from areas with real, literal multi-year war. War does involve complete breakdowns of norms, things that would never be acceptable become ... Well, doable. In this context, assuming a predisposition of violence and sexual assault from the source culture, and the desensitising effects of war, we could imagine that the correct response is to treat the displaced people…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:46 AM
1

Don't take 'unproven' out of context, it was at one end of the range. There could be genuine errors in the accuser misidentifying the attacker. True, but what are the chances of knowing person X so well as to be able to recognise them and name them, and then being attacked by somebody so similar that you misidentified them after an alleged encounter? It could happen, false memories, misattribution of single feature and so on. Familiarity might produce such an outcome, but producing a base result…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 01:59 PM
1

I refer to the 10,000 cases where the accuser was named and DNA was available. It's well documented. 20%-40% exonerated to unproven. Using only that figure, which does not involved any human judgement, can't be spun, etc, etc, etc. You have a base rate to start from. There is no reason to believe the attacks where there is no DNA evidence varies. Likewise the innocence project is getting something like a 17% hit rate, through DNA, of men convicted of rape, though this can be because of things li…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:04 AM
1

errrr, depends on the figures you believe. If you take the FBI study, 20% of allegation (where DNA evidence is available and the attacker named by the accuser) were proved false, foes up to 40% is you inconclusive. There is the standard 2-8% false allegation rate normally accepted, there is also the (I think) 20% where police found 'no evidence of assault', and so on. To believe the majority of positngs would made by rapists who escaped conviction, is a step too far. There would have to be evide…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:34 PM
1

How can I be voted down for suggesting a sauce for the goose arrangement? Weird!
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:16 PM
0

There's an argument for a 'do not sleep with this rape accuser' web site, so men know who to avoid. There is seldom legal redress against for false rape accusers, so some sort of shaming social media seems appropriate. It seems making false accusations toxic should be the job of the law enforcement agencies. But making the number 1 search result in Google a false rape claim would be a good start. Of course, if the accuser was raped by the guy, she shouldn't be on there. That's right and proper.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:03 PM
1

I was being ironic.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:18 PM
2

So, I know some deep feminists who reacted the same. I don't expect them to feel shame because cognitive dissonance is a distant land. And being girlies, they only understand numbers eversoslightly. So, not what you asked... But, circumcism. If you can stand it, look up pictures of botched ones, print them out, and take a few with you. Hand them out for discussion with a smile. Make sure you really don't get their levels of distress as you keep piling the images on. Always have new ones ready. T…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:16 PM
1

It's just happened. Give people time to think, analyse, write, edit, check facts, correct, and then discuss matters arising.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:59 AM
2

It's like fucktard, but sexist.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:32 PM
7

i thought my dad was a just a violent, cruel vindictive bastard until exposed to the full extent of my mother's insanity. And really, she is mad, tin foil hat, machines in the walls, mind control rays and ufo implant bat shit crazy. He is a bastard, but he was also driven to extremes, she was just mad, chemical imbalance... But, I can't stand to be near either of them. They make me sick. So, when I made my exit, it was with the resolve I would never be cruel, violent, irrational, a cunt, or a ba…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 08:50 PM
2

Not in the cases discussed in the original article, which just happen to be the headlines the current social/political environment. You are engaging in "what-about-ism", which is a tedious and worn out trick used for no purpose than avoid dealing with facts presented.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 01:24 PM
1

I'm arguing that your points are fudge in the face of very clear figures, and of no value in this context. Perhaps in a more theoretical context they have value, but not here and now.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:42 AM
5

Wasn't it recently shown that boys get marked down by female teachers so equivalent work is two grades lower? I think it also showed that boys did less work for these grades. This suggests to me marking was based on effort rather than results, which is not what happens in real life.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 11:09 PM
12

It was Jess Phillips. She also wrote that as far as she was concerned if you were born male you had hit the jackpot. She is a very ignorant creature that got her position as MP at least partly by there being on a women only short list. EDIT: or you can send here a copy of the report, edited highlights, personal opinions at her official House Of Commons email address (google 'jess phillips MP email'), though please don't wish her ill, or the poor little flower will put it on twitter and claim she…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:55 PM
12

are you trying to argue away the points in the posting? It strikes me that lower pay, lower university attendance, low social status (as revealed via survey) can't be countered by this fog in your thinking. Simply, equality is symmetrical, inequality is asymmetrical. Privilege is the one with the +++ on their side, disadvantage is the one with the --- on their side. That's not subjective. That's hard figures. It may be that some white middle class woman suffering some first world problem or harb…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:11 PM
1

Put the rape drugs in your own drink, refuse to share them, even if she begs.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:21 PM
3

Run!
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:06 PM
1

My husband can't get my house or my salary. He can/is rotting, looking for another man to trap. He likes them rich. If you can't protect your pre-marriage assets, don't get married. if you can legitimately get married abroad where pre-nups have full legal force, marry there (if in the EU).
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:59 PM
2

"Hagbagging"?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:36 PM
7

Is there a word for women with oversized handbags, clutching them close like babies rather than putting them on the floor (like men do with their rucksacks, briefcases, and sports bags) so that no one has enough space, and then act aggressively when you point out their handbag is not more important than people trying to get to work, and then they spit at you, pull out an egg McMuffin and chew with their mouth open so the stink washes over you? Just wondering.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 11:24 PM
1

(Irony alert) I'll put it to you like this, acting like a fucking feminist cunt makes you the same as a fucking feminist cunt, regardless of whether you are a MRM or not, you're still just being a bitch. And 'Social Justice Warrior', what the fuck is that about? You read something you don't like (with secret orders encoded in it..quick, wrap another fucking layer of tin foil on your head to protect your brain) and scream like a fucking baby 'I'll do what I want! I'll say what I want'. Jesus, wha…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 11:11 PM
3

That's not a little black dress, that's a little black event horizon.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:27 PM
1

In the UK non-consensual penetration is only a crime if you've got a dick. If you blow or mount a man without permission, you're not a rapist. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/rape/section/1 If we believe studies, this excludes maybe 20-40% of rapes (as defined as sex with coercion/non-free consent): https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/men-a0035915.pdf So the UK has a way to go.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 01:48 PM
1

Which you can find out about here: http://theredpillmovie.com/ and here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cassiejaye/the-red-pill-a-documentary-film
/r/MensRights02/01/16 01:39 PM
2

If you consider 3/4 attempts are by women, but 3/4 Suicides are male one could be led into thinking that one group are incompetent and/or attention seeking and the other competent and/or sincere.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter