TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

akakaze Archive

View 0 posts and 152 comments by akakaze on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

If you see a demographic as a monolith that always agrees completely with itself, you can find hypocrisy everywhere. Some feminists disagree with other feminists about stuff.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:28 AM
8

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/12/22 01:27 AM
1

Unless the judge sentenced him to paralysis and starvation (which seems unlikely), then the guards are guilty of, at best, vigilantism.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 09:49 PM
1

I saw the first trailer I've ever seen for this movie on a DVD about a month ago. This movie flopped on the failure to advertise.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:27 AM
1

I think draft law hasn't changed mostly because the draft hasn't been used in so long. Not saying a change would result in women being drafted, but trying to change the law right now would change very little, while possibly spooking people into thinking a draft was imminent. Neither side of this debate wants that, regardless of whether they'd like to change or to defend a law that isn't even being used right now.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:55 AM
1

How . . . how many racists is she?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 12:31 AM
1

Remember what? That the cops could just decide not to bother, and that I'd have no legal recourse against them if they did? What exactly do you suppose I'd be able to do with that information?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:06 AM
2

Castle Rock v. Gonzales, they did not have to investigate it. Every time a police officer responds to a crime, they are choosing which laws they feel like enforcing that day, and who they feel like enforcing them against.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:27 AM
2

I would think just asking "It seems like you're going through something, do you need to talk?" with the caveat that if he says no, you drop it. I expect that will lead the average guy to open up when he needs to, and have the comfort in the relationship of knowing that his need for space will be respected as well.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 04:26 AM
1

I'd compare this to women complaining about slut shaming. Is it bad? Yeah. Is it an issue mostly perpetuated internally to the demographic? Also yes. This is more a thing that happens because other men think it's funny than because women derive some sadistic enjoyment from it.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:12 AM
1

So, at what point is an inebriated person responsible for their own actions, and at what point are they not?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:56 PM
1

The point is not that this couldn't be legally classified as a rape, the point is that, whatever the genders of each party, this shouldn't be considered an act of rape. America (where I assumed this took place) is a democracy, and criticism of the law, as well as beliefs that the law should be changed, are allowed.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:40 PM
-1

Should we stop pursuing DUIs, since the driver didn't have the volition to decide to drive the car? If drunkeness absolves a person of the consequences of their own decisions, where do we draw that line?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:38 PM
3

"The dress code is selectively applied by sexist standards." is a valid argument.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:25 AM
5

Schools mostly function to ensure that no one reaches the age of 18 without learning that the authorities are lazy, arbitrary, and tyrannical.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:23 AM
1

Eh. Separate gender schools work well for young boys; if someone's going to do good for all out of sexist motivations, let 'em. Keep an eye out for when those views start doing their full, potential harm; but I think if we could make Operation:Paperclip work, we've proven that we can keep an eye on those we disagree with, while standing aside when their ignorance stumbles into societal benefit.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 09:54 AM
2

It's cool that it's a celebrity, but I personally dislike the show. She comes across as an unpleasant bully who willingly chose to work in small claims and then became offended to not be working with legal experts.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:40 AM
1

Canada extradites for this, sadly. However, it looks like Mexico and most of Central and South America does not.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:47 PM
1

I say make it a prerequisite of voting, but decriminalize it otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:38 AM
9

The American school system is a way of teaching children early on that all authorities are lazy, dictatorial, and prone to favoritism.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:40 AM
1

OP, I'd encourage you, if you're in the comments to take all the revenge fantasy as just that: fantasizing. Revenge fantasies can be healthy, and if you need to cope, there are definitely worse ways than concocting mental revenge. Beyond that, I encourage you to be in touch with a suicide watch program and not do anything, to yourself or anyone else, that can't be undone.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:28 PM
7

Susan B. Anthony died, and Margaret Sanger led a lot of their movement in a militant drive toward batshit insanity.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:22 PM
1

I'm not saying we are, just seemed likely and worth advising against.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:10 AM
2

Like I said, I think she probably is guilty, I'm just advocating not making a bandwagon until more information comes out.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:34 PM
3

I think she probably did it, but let's not smear her in the court of public opinion until everything comes out at the trial. This article doesn't even look like a hundred words long, and that's very little to go on. She might be guilty as sin and found innocent, but then at least the details of the trial will have come out and any mishandlings by the system will be in full display. She may also be innocent, and this paper could be twisting things. What it says it that police say investigators sa…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:14 PM
2

We've said this a lot, and I think to handle things with the fairness necessary we need to say it now: this is still to face trial. She should not be smeared in the court of public opinion on accusation alone. I really want to jump on the bandwagon against her right now, but we can't if we want the public message we've been putting out to have any consistency.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:51 PM
2

Thank you, Saint Claybratt.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:38 AM
1

Don't suicide rates go up on Wednesdays? I feel like someone told me that the only calendar correlation was Wednesdays.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:25 AM
3

I think pajamas are a secondary issue here to a vice principal that threatens suspension when accused of sexism. That's a horrific abuse of power that should probably be addressed up the chain. Unfortunately, in this context it might just get lumped in with something as trivial as who's wearing what, so I'm not sure about the best bet on this one.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:22 AM
1

This is why we need systems to help people escape the system. Routes and safe houses to get them to and across non-extradition borders with new names and enough cash in their wallets to have a chance.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:40 AM
1

I feel that respect, to any gender, ought to be freely given. After I give you my respect, though, it's yours to lose.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 05:37 AM
1

"Montgomery, now 27, is living at his father's home in western North Carolina. He has previously said he didn't think Coast should go to prison for her actions." In other circumstances, I think I'd feel differently; but he was the one wronged and his view on how to handle things should carry quite a bit of weight in this.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:06 AM
2

If you see feminists rallying, stop and record it if you can. They want a war, and they'll throw the first blow. When they start this, there needs to be evidence that they started this; they've become very good at playing the victims.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:54 AM
3

I think OP is hoping someone on here might know more specifics about a study they've only heard about.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:28 AM
1

I consider it a diplomatic solution. I'm finding something in the roots of their movement to praise to try to keep the discourse open as long as possible. I also identify as an MRA and don't consider the two to be at odds. I think the MRA movement does great things for men; I think that feminism as defined and exemplified by Susan B. Anthony did great things for women, and that by her example progress can still be made rather than the hypocritical, aggressive movement we see today.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:31 AM
2

I still identify as an Antonian feminist. Susan B. Anthony took upon herself both rights and responsibilities; she was what the movement should have been. Then Margaret Sanger irrevocably corrupted the movement. She believed that white men should be kept as breeding stock for white women while other races were gently wiped out through forced sterility.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:12 AM
1

It's a revenge fantasy. I've never heard her advocate this behavior in real-life any more than Christopher Nolan advocates wealth-based vigilantism.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:39 AM
1

If more feminists held to Susan B. Anthony's stances, the movement would be much more palatable today.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:29 AM
7

Ask someone who identifies as feminist whether they associate more with the Susan B. Anthony or the Margaret Sanger school of thought on the movement. Susan B. Anthony did a lot of things right, and if more feminists took her tack on equality, the world would be drastically improved. Margaret Sanger believed that white men should be sexual chattel for white women while the, as she called them, "lesser races" were wiped out via forced sterility.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:18 AM
1

That wasn't the impression I got, but from the comments, I'm a distinct minority on that; so there's a strong possibility I missed some tone or attitude the author was going for.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:56 AM
0

I got the impression that she would just like a man to say no, rather than "maybe", "let's talk about it later", or "I don't know." Honestly, the most offensive thing is the title, and often that gets punched up to something attention grabbing by the higher-ups rather than the writer themselves.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:38 AM
6

I generally disagree with Obama in terms of policy, but there is nothing overbearingly offensive here. It reeks of the assumption that sex is just something everyone does from puberty onward, and that unwanted pregnancies are just something that can happen to a person; but there's so much of that going around it's honestly white noise. I think women would be in for the culture shock of their lives if they woke up tomorrow morning and found a world of men willing to keep our libido in check; who …
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:23 AM
4

I try to speak in terms of Antonian and Sangerian feminists. I would call myself both an MRA and an Antonian feminist. Compare Susan B. Anthony demanding jail time on grounds of equality with Margaret Sanger calling for the subjugation of men and an peaceful ethnic purge via sterilization. The more we can point out that Sanger proposed both womens' and whites' superiority, the more we can call her whole line of thinking, and the subsequent corruption of the movement, into question.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:45 AM
1

So, is Cersei Lannister the new face of empowered womanhood? Sarcasm aside, great point. I'll have to give her books a read.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:54 AM
1

That'd work, almost anything's better than how it works now.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:38 AM
1

Mental development is tricky to measure, though, some forty year olds probably shouldn't be allowed to claim themselves as dependents. As for emotional maturity, a lot of that is hormonal and tied (even if not one to one) to physical development during puberty, which would be the simplest standard of actual maturity (i.e. not an arbitrarily set age) to measure.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:56 PM
1

Right, but if in a place where 18 was the age of consent, pressing charges against her as well for statutory rape might have kangaroo-ed the whole thing enough to get tossed.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:51 PM
2

Well, Ireland.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:49 PM
1

Physical screening for completion of puberty? It's not ideal but it would make a hell of a lot more sense from a developmental standpoint than setting an age across the board.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:41 PM
1

Organized crime could monitor patrol locations, during prohibition the mob was able to get it legally mandated that rum runner patrol patterns be published in the prior week's newspaper and make evidence found while deviating from the published schedule inadmissible. I agree that police actions should have much, much more oversight than they do, but prior or real time are just really bad ideas.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:03 AM
1

Thanks, that image didn't load when I read through the first time; please disregard.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:59 PM
1

I didn't see the direct comparison to the KKK in that article. While I systematically disagree with what was written there, we do ourselves no service putting words in their mouths. If I missed the reference in the article, I apologize.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:43 PM
1

"But women and girls with mental health issues are not picking up semiautomatic weapons and shooting schoolchildren." No, they drown them in bathtubs instead.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:57 AM
1

Is it criticism of feminism or discrimination against women? The translation job is pretty spotty.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:58 AM
4

I'm not sure I understand the position that O2 and Symantec are in; are they hired filtering services, like Barracuda? Are they web providers? Where do they stand for it to be acceptable for them to engage in any censorship at all?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:41 PM
28

I tried to read the comments, I really did; but every time she responded to something she used the word "Patriarchy" like it was some sort of punctuation mark. I could not piece together what she was trying to say in a lot of it.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:04 AM
1

Yeah, how come the singular entities of feminists and MRAs don't realize that neither side is a singular entity. /s
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:40 AM
5

Is "Timothy" from the comments anywhere in here? She said she deleted your post for revealing personal information, but I feel like the kind of person who's okay with a nude castration march ought to be just as outed. Please, if you know who this is, tell us who to avoid. Put a face to the asinine vitriol.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:55 AM
3

OP needs to keep cash ready, cash always spends and at first hint she might try for child support, (hearing she is pregnant would do it), get somewhere that doesn't extradite.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:37 PM
8

If I lived in France or Germany, or if America ever hits that point, there's the Atlas Shrugged method of protesting being taken advantage of by society. See how feminists like it when men rise up and disappear en masse.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:12 PM
5

Honestly, I kind of want to call myself all the worst possible things on that page; just so women who think this is okay stay away from me on their own.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:33 AM
0

According to the abstract, it sounded like boys were better at mechanical reasoning, not smarter overall. I'm not sure the title you've chosen is 100% accurate.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:40 PM
0

Were you interrupting the lecture, or expressing disagreement within an assignment or class discussion? That's going to have a huge impact on whether you'll be viewed as a class disruption or a victim of differing ideologies.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:58 PM
0

At the University level, appealing within the school would likely get better results. Petitions usually exist to keep people from simply booting dissenters.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:51 PM
3

I was just saying that on this sub, when the topic of false allegations is raised, it usually has to do with the malicious side and is a rally to call for punitive response. Obviously any accusation of rape against an innocent is devastating, but in regards to this topic and the question of how we work out the statistics, clarity of terms is very important. That's all I was pushing for.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:44 PM
4

I did coursework helping out in an inner city school. The students who did well had all the resources they needed to test into college. Teachers were knowledgeable about both merit and needs-based scholarships. Still, many of the students ignored the opportunities put in front of them. Most of the issues faced in poorer schools could be fixed if the students spent even five minutes giving two shits.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:41 AM
2

That takes place after roughly 50,000 annual income. Prior to that point the direct correlation between money and quality of life typically translates into more happiness and satisfaction.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:35 AM
10

Proven not guilty and even proven innocent isn't usually tantamount to how MRM tends to describe false accusations. While some of these would be what we tend to describe --malicious, thoughtless, selfish acts of intentional deception-- not every claim against an innocent is knowingly false. Misidentification and confusion of facts are going to be a piece of any proceeding that relies on testimony, and while mistaken accusations are damaging, they are not always willfully false.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:30 AM
9

While it does specifically say women, the number of those served would not be changed by instead specifying pregnant and breastfeeding "people". So long as there are also programs for other highly specific medical issues, I don't see a problem with it.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:24 AM
1

Only thing I'd suggest if it comes up in the future is to include the threat of violence in your requests to stop. (though threat is probably the wrong word). If it's in there it might be enough to deter the behavior without actually having to get violent. "Stop. Please stop. You are making me uncomfortable. Stop or I will retaliate. I'm serious, I will hit back." Then the slap. At that point you've asked her to stop more than enough and she knew what was coming if she didn't.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:13 PM
2

My first impression from it is that calling a girl a "cheap date" is sometimes seen as calling her easy or easily drunk, the idea being that she is being insulted, not that she is on a cheap date.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:57 PM
4

PETA probably won't help, they support the euthanization of all domestic breeds on the grounds that they should never have existed.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:20 AM
1

I don't mind people publicly tagging themselves as not worth my time.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:47 AM
1

Exactly, the system in place will allow OP an irresponsible amount of authority to invest in anyone, and will necessitate strong moral fiber to resist.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:14 AM
1

I'd say, if it really is an issue of getting the wrong judge, I'd ask your lawyer (speaking to OP, now) about the possibility of appeals or mistrial and if there's anything you can be documenting now to make sure you get a different judge after this.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:10 PM
2

Agreed, get to the Middle East, I personally think their pendulum swings too far the other way, but it could work as a safe haven.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:03 PM
1

Somalia should be the ones dealing with Somalian civil rights issues. The UN exists to air and hopefully settle international issues before they lead to wars, and it isn't even very good at that.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:32 PM
2

I'm glad this isn't a more widespread view. I have a tight circle of friends, including no women who think of me as a tertiary growth of humanity. If all women felt this way, I'd have to try to incite an Atlas Shrugged scenario. "Alright, we'll just go then, good luck without us."
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:06 PM
1

So, next time a woman kills her kids, we can blame hysterical uterus? /s
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:02 PM
1

Not once we adopt similar car insurance rules. Then gender won't be hurting our auto rates OR hurting their health rates.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:21 PM
3

It's telling that his calm demeanor and tremendous patience has earned him nothing but compliments and sympathy from the neighbors. I've always felt it's better to not boast, and instead act in such an impressive way that others will do your bragging for you.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:56 PM
7

It's a sense of humor, he can make himself the butt of the joke without truly devaluing himself in any way. I think it's one of the strengths that militant feminism lacks: the social serenity of knowing you can get laughed at and survive.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:34 PM
11

Not legally, but the physical act of changing the locks is pretty simple. She'd be in deep legal shit (if she's treated with justice by the system) but it would be doable.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:17 PM
4

How much longer is his lease? If the cops won't do anything for him, I would look into finding a new place for similar rent, mobilize a group of friends to get things moved out within hours and cancel the lease. The police will probably evict when there's no rent money going to the complex.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:13 PM
5

I'm surprised labor saving home devices weren't a consideration for the longer hours worked by women in poorer countries. It seems, with the larger percentage on home work among females, that that would be the obvious explanation in countries with fewer resources.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:20 PM
2

Funny, but especially in this discussion the /s sign off wouldn't be a bad idea.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:10 PM
1

I think that has to do with a perceived shift between Susan B. Anthony's ideals (If you'd arrest a man who'd done what I did, then I demand you arrest me.) and Margaret Sanger's (The lesser races should be sterilized, and aryan women rule a breeding stock of aryan men.) After Sanger, there seems to be a thought process that she represented a fundamental shift in the movement, rather than an outlying voice, plus those who've followed her ideals seem to be the most outspoken.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:08 PM
2

It was one statement, which he apologized for. That shouldn't make him legally prohibited from doing the job he's spent his lifetime on. It was a really stupid thing to say, the apology was only the start of what he should do in recompense, disbarment is well out of proportion to what he actually did.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:22 PM
9

I work on a military base and we had to go through training for this: the repeal of DADT prohibited dismissal based on being openly homosexual. It reiterated that known homosexuality of a fellow soldier does not excuse a soldier from following otherwise lawful orders. It did not extend military granted spousal benefits to same sex partners. You can disagree with what is happening, but the repeal of DADT only goes so far as letting the soldier in the relationship keep her job while her relationsh…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:18 PM
8

I'm stunned by how many people are calling for disbarment. He should face heavy consequences, but to be legally prohibited from continuing to do the job you've trained for your whole life over something said in an argument is absolutely out of line. There should be consequences, essentially robing him of every cent he spent on law school should not be one of them.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:12 PM
21

This, let him get the check and then mumble about damn patriarchy, not letting women pay for themselves.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:23 PM
1

Eh, seems more thoughtless and lazy than malicious. Given, thoughtless and lazy does nothing to advance good causes, but I don't think it sets us back.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:38 AM
0

Non participation in selective service should be decriminalized while still tied to voting rights. Conscientious dissent is available for anyone who wants to opt out of the combined right to vote/responsibility to sign up for the draft.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:36 AM
2

There was a notion that seems applicable now, if it continues to seem that men's labor and talents are being taken advantage of without social appreciation or recognition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:31 AM
1

I realize that doing it here could cause problems for you, but I think it would be good if a throwaway account appeared on this sub with sparser details warning guys to avoid this particular school.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:14 AM
4

From the article, it looks like she's only been charged with the stalking so far, and other charges are forthcoming. 200 yard restraining order and house arrest with an ankle monitor sounds reasonable until she's tried for attempted murder, or attempted manslaughter, or vehicular endangerment, or whatever the running over gets called.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:55 AM
2

So by their new rule, women can't wear pants/shorts anymore, right?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:54 PM
0

Honestly, I think this can be a great strength for us. The social resilience, if applied in proper circumstances can help us present ourselves as more level-headed, good-humored, patient, or any number of other, positive traits. It would take some effort to hone this ability to the point of targeting a specific impression, but this could be powerful if embraced.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:07 AM
1

If you can't get the ball rolling officially to request a men's centre, just pull together a small group. Unadvertised, unannounced, spread by word of mouth, don't even meet on campus if you can avoid it, find a conference room that a restaurant or library will let you use. On my college (a Christian University), freshman housing was broken up into gender segregated stairwells, and throughout freshman year, we were expected to participate in storytime: rules were simple, each member got one week…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:10 AM
3

Four years late, but it seems like people are starting to handle this right: she's being charged with perjury, and no gag order to keep her name out of the press.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:04 PM
2

It comes from nautical practice, in an age when women weren't often taught to swim, but men were. Nowadays, anyone who actually has cause to use the phrase understands it to mean, those who are capable save in capable before themselves. That's how it was taught to my Sea Scout ship anyways.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:12 AM
1

This is why I read on the bus, I rode for about a year and a half, and consistently stuck my nose in a book and shut out everything around me. Only had someone force their way into my attention once, when I finished my book partway through a trip and didn't have another to pick up.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:25 PM
2

She doesn't have any real authority, it seems more poignant to simply say "no" without further comment.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:12 PM
1

Why is it just soon? So long as you're there it sounds like she can call down the law on you at a whim.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:44 AM
3

Perfectly understandable, I make the same mistake myself sometimes. Please don't shun the comment sections over it.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:46 AM
2

When the football players started wearing pink.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:42 AM
1

Is John Percival a redditor? Seriously, if you are him, or know the details of the case personally, her name needs to go public. Turnabout's fair game. I want to be clear that I'm not advocating anything except making her name as public as his; we aren't a news source, screw their injunctions.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:25 AM
2

She burned someone, she ought to be tried and sentenced to murder, possibly on an insanity plea, seems like it might be the case and it's good that a professional is looking into that. I'm not saying leniency, she might need to be in a facility till the day she dies for public safety's sake. Still, glad she was outed as this mentally unstable on someone so disposable.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:42 AM
1

Don't lump this asshole in like he represents conservatives because he fucking doesn't.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:02 AM
1

I work janitorial in a hotel, same story. It's like women sit on the toilet tearing the TP into confetti. They are always out of toilet paper and shredded paper's always all over the floor.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:19 AM
3

Growing a beard. Being able to just say what's wrong and what would make it right without any pussyfooting: I can go to a friend and just say, "Hey, I'm going through some shit, will you get shitfaced with me and make fun of bad movies?" Valuing high intellectual discussions, not to say women can't or don't have these discussions, just that as a guy among guys the conversation can very naturally turn to whether comparing The Count of Monte Cristo with Sweeney Todd should be done by Tolstoy or Ma…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:31 PM
8

I am looking forward to marriage because of this, spending every single night next to, basically, a perpetually cold pillow for the rest of my life.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:20 PM
1

I feel like, with how much men are proclaimed upon to be practically minded in society, we can diet in equal parts to body image and overall health. It does nothing for my body type to cut caffeine without cutting decaffeinated sodas, but I feel better.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:12 PM
1

I'd agree about the introversion being sometimes to your benefit. Especially as someone in a blue collar job, as long as I work hard, I don't really have to talk to people, and I think some of the people at my work have thought more of me within the "strong and silent" archetype.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:06 PM
2

Interesting, but why is it in /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:57 AM
-6

I hate this argument and it needs to be stopped, not spread to everyone. It's like I bulldozed an apartment complex with a hundred people inside because I own it and it's my building, my choice. You don't want to be responsible for another life? Don't have sex, it works for both genders.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:32 PM
2

A polygamist has been killed by his multiple wives. It's bad, but it seems like the situation got a little fucked up five wives ago.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:26 AM
1

Meh, it's a gimmick, nothing more. The guy wants some attention to get people to have heard of his town when vacation plans get made.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:22 AM
2

She's gorgeous, maybe even a little skinny in the SI at the end, but it's no business of mine, and, as I'll never meet her, I just hope as a stranger and fellow human being that she's healthy and living well.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:55 AM
2

Fair enough, but even applied correctly, 80 seconds without oxygen is not something you just throw around for crowd control.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:23 PM
10

A choke position for 80 seconds! Seems excessive for anything below deadly force.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:58 AM
0

Different sensitivities, like if a guy were to say "I like girls with smaller boobs, and I like your boobs." it would probably be received differently than "I like guys with little dicks, and I like your dick."
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:11 AM
1

Not necessarily, in the same sense that book burning does not make one a Nazi. Whatever the motivations, there are historical associative ties that are going to come into the discussion, especially when it's a country with a reputation like Germany's.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:57 AM
3

This article is nearly five years old. I've gone through their comments, adding my "like" votes, but there's little aside from moving onto newer discussions to be done about it.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:37 AM
12

A history of anti-semitism. Combine that with the Jewish roots of the practice of circumcision, and this may actually entrench people more in favor of religious circumcision.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:44 AM
2

I just mean in terms of making Bender more heroic rather than the Vending Machine. I agree that it is a good pop culture example of what MRA's stand for, but was wondering if the show creators were shooting for that, or simply figured that the audience would rather root for Bender than a vending machine they hadn't seen before.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:55 AM
2

How much of it was showing a good father and how much of it was the writers favoring the main character over the one-shot character?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:06 AM
3

No, women who can't spell "breaking" piss me off, too.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:39 AM
5

What about this bothered you? It seemed perfectly reasonable to me.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 11:09 PM
3

Really? Cause a civil challenge to single combat seems so much simpler. Even if the challenge was refused, issuing it was often seen as satisfaction of honor.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:35 PM
2

If you email her, CC it to your home email to be sure there's a copy showing what you said and when you said it to make sure she can't delete the email and make false claims about its contents. Be very non-confrontational, just make clear your concerns and that you are feeling threatened. If it isn't anything overt and she hasn't been told it's unwelcome, it isn't technically any form of harassment.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:34 PM
0

I've told the reverse version of this joke, and only keep for friends girls who don't get bent out of shape at it and jibes like it. Easiest way to go, see how far you'd like to rib other people, and put up with it coming your direction only to that point. Learning to take a joke doesn't mean being a doormat, it means that if you'd expect them to put up with the same joke at their expense, then let them have their fun at yours.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:33 AM
1

Briefs man here, and I have a hard time with boxers. I tend to catch the nuts between my legs while walking and sit on them much more often. These seem detrimental to sperm count, but is there a way to keep your boys safely wrangled in boxers?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:29 AM
3

You're still one of the child's legal guardians, right? Couldn't you drive out and pick her up from wherever she's going to school now, bring her home and go forward knowing what to ask for from CPS if they try this again? Seems like the simplest solution is basic turnabout. Then she'll have to sue you for anything and, as a defendant, you'll get free legal counsel from the state (I think that's how that works). Just whatever you do, keep calm, an angry guy is just going to get slapped with ever…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 08:54 PM
4

The juxtaposition of circumcision with Hitler may not be the best one, since many anti-semitic organizations have historically begun by outlawing circumcision, typically in the B.C. years and I'm not sure the Nazis themselves outlawed the practice, but antisemitism is a huge aspect of what they're known for.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:15 AM
5

It's what happens when people who shouted "swiper no swiping" at a television never got an education beyond nick jr.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 03:00 AM
5

A lot of it rises from the fact that many women were trained to a completely sedentary life and wouldn't have ever been taught to swim. Also, that the ship would be staffed primarily by men who would have specialized training for survival. Simply, when this rule was used more extensively, men would have been the only ones expected to survive a long tread without a lifeboat. I've done nautical programs before, and this rule is usually taught in the spirit of: those without specialized training an…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 04:12 AM
1

Wait, the article confuse me a bit, can someone clear up for me difference between a forty year sentence and the twenty years served that get mentioned in the article?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:48 PM
2

At a point, they'll call her what she asks them to call her. Don't write off the middle name thing, if you handle it right, it could work.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 08:59 AM
1

Go to one news outlet after another until you find that will run this story, milk it for everything, keep the documentation to prove that nothing you did in the course of dragging her through the mud was slander. Do everything you can to get people on your side, even if it doesn't get one red cent back to you, you make her a pariah, by whatever means necessary.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:49 AM
1

Ask him what you can do to help, his knowing that you want to help, and that you want to do so in tangible, practical, pragmatic ways will go miles for just keeping his spirits up, even if he doesn't have any ideas for how you can help, knowing he's got someone willing to help with legwork on his side of things should be a massive stress release.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:36 AM
2

"doing more crime"? Hey y'all, who wants to go "do crime" with me. I've got 13 ounces of premium crime for us to do under the bridge.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:27 AM
2

A lot of girls have not had it properly explained how much this hurts. It helped for me to emphasize to one that it is an organ, as sensitive as any internal organ, but without any barrier of protection. Then compare it to the eyes, (I think someone else said this here), ask her to imagine an eye, out of the socket and hanging by the optic nerve, and then imagine getting punched in it. Explain the consequences, including vomiting, lingering pain in the groin radiating into the midsection, and th…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:20 AM
0

Oh well, Stephen Fry isn't infalliable, and since that point got made sarcastically, he has nothing whatsoever to contribute to a discussion.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:07 AM
-1

You don't have to laugh, but take it in the spirit it's intended. Laughter doesn't make it a joke, lightness, joviality, and good-natured intentions make it a joke. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnSByCb8lqY&feature=related
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:31 PM
1

That was my point: we can say it, but it'll ring more true if we've lived it first.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:25 PM
-11

Pick your battles, if you can't take a joke you've got no right to tell jokes. If something impactful starts to happen, report with all due dilligence. Just don't kill good-natured ribbing for us for the sake of other demographics not being able to take a joke.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:33 PM
7

But what do we think of women who shout sexism and discrimination when they ought to learn to take a joke? I'm not saying we let them continue to get away with it, but the best case for a less litigious society is to set the example. Take jokes as they're intended, be able to laugh at yourself, and remember these times so you can use your own good behavior to try to draw parallels and set a good example when others complain about jokes at their expense.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:29 PM
2

Eh, without knowing more I wouldn't jump to conclusions. I remember being outraged at a program a classmate was putting together that would only hire women, then I found out it was a battered women's program working with victims who would need months of psychiatric counseling not to break down at the sight of a man. Not that this sounds like that, but on occassion gender can be a BFOQ. (Also not saying this is definitely something reasonable, just that there is really NO way of knowing on this l…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:07 AM
3

So, 1993. There's been some time, what was the fallout of this?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:08 AM
1

Above all, stay calm. Do not raise your voice, do not match their tone, do not delve into sarcasm. You have a strong position, stand on it and little else. When they mock, respond factually and calmly; same when they yell; and onward.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:34 PM
1

I don't get the people saying he was stupid to go to an ex for dental work. I'm a man, went through a bad break-up a few years ago (not traumatic bad, but pretty heart-wrenching), and if my job required doing something for her, I would. I'd do it as well as a I could, and I'd breathe a sigh of relief when she left as my only consolation. How do people think you can predict this level of crazy from someone who should be a detatched professional?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 11:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter