akoolaidkiller Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I hate that some people make it seem like most men don't have to be scared for their lives unlike women How many murder perpetuators are also men?	/r/MensRights	13/05/26 09:22 PM
1	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women So, for instance, I made up the widely practiced and documented female genital mutilation to excuse feminism? I think that’s just an excuse not to give evidence for your unsubstantiated claims like I’ve asked you to.	/r/MensRights	24/08/25 05:01 PM
1	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women No, it’s not. The previous reply to you was explaining the Oxford definition of “feminism,” which is why you said “Nice dictionary definition fallacy,” which is why the next reply explained why dictionary definitions are relevant. If what you’re actually saying is that this was the same point made to a different person in a different reply, then that’s still entirely different than repeating a point to the same person in the same conversation, no? So speaking of productivity, how about you actua…	/r/MensRights	24/08/25 12:20 PM
0	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women 1) Any number of words in a dictionary? I think you mean dictionary definitions. And dictionary definitions are very relevant in a conversation about the meaning of words. And if you don’t think so, then why should your anecdotal definition of a word matter more than anyone else’s? 2) It would be helpful if you were more specific in your first paragraph, rather than assuming I should know what you mean. 3) If you truly believe that actions are what matter, then why do you only focus on this one …	/r/MensRights	24/08/25 03:03 AM
1	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women Not any more fallacious than the implication that dictionary definitions are irrelevant in a conversation about the meaning of words.	/r/MensRights	24/08/25 12:33 AM
-2	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women You are trying to find a reason why it's okay for yourself to generalize about a group you don't like (feminists) but not okay for others to generalize about a group you belong to (men), and it doesn’t work. You’re posting in a Men’s Rights subreddit. Men’s Rights is a “human made concept,” isn’t it? So why shouldn’t you also be subject to generalization?	/r/MensRights	23/08/25 01:48 PM
1	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women You’re missing important context of the addition of new dictionary definitions which is that they’re peer reviewed by linguists and experts from other academic fields first. And feminism is an actual academic field, so it would be nearly impossible to change the definition to what you want it to be. And even then, I don’t think you would anymore. Because once that happens, they could also include similarly negative definitions to words that you might resonate with.	/r/MensRights	23/08/25 01:36 PM
-1	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women This is the Oxford definition of feminism: “the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.” It doesn’t say “on the basis of the superior sex.” It says “on the basis of the equality of the sexes.” It’s easy to generalize anyone, which is why it’s not a way to have an actually productive conversation that helps anyone. For an example, you say it’s hard not to generalize feminists while being upset that men are being generalized.	/r/MensRights	23/08/25 01:07 PM
0	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women So you say feminism was never about equality. If true, then the lexicographers didn’t get that memo when they established the definition of feminism. So why would they change it if they were to “work through survey” now? Also, if feminism was never about equality, then what happened before women got the right to vote in 1920? Or before they could sign a lease in 1974?	/r/MensRights	23/08/25 01:07 PM
-11	Obama talking about boys problems, immediatly divert it to the effect on women Or you just think feminism is something that it isn’t.	/r/MensRights	23/08/25 01:19 AM
0	A "Man's World?" "Is rape something to be worried about, especially since it's rarely actually prosecuted?" Uh, yeah? Regardless, I know you used the FBI stat to show "a comparatively low number of officially counted cases." I was making a rebuttal. Most accusations, false or otherwise, aren't prosecuted because there isn't enough sufficient evidence to go to trial. Did I not say this? Yes, I did: "["Unfounded" cases] are simply cases where investigators couldn't find enough physical and/or sufficient evidence t…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 10:59 PM
1	A "Man's World?" My first impression of the blog posts was that they were written by one person and posted on an un-secure website. Not from an reputable website edited and peer-reviewed by several people. But I did read them. If you want to bring up FBI statistics, as if that helps your case, then understand that the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program has historically categorized some reports as "unfounded," but this doesn't mean they were false. They are simply cases where investigators couldn't find …	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 09:33 PM
1	A "Man's World?" 5)"That women had power at all disproves the patriarchy assumption." No, it simply shows there were exceptions to the rule that only men can have power. 6) "Since it doesn't matter what the setup was a thousand years ago in terms of solving today's issues we could simply turn to today's issues and what type of society we want to setup." First of all, we're not talking about a thousand years ago. You brought up the military draft and women's suffrage, so we're talking about a span of a hundred to…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 08:52 PM
1	A "Man's World?" 1) No, I didn't and yes did you did ask 'who is the system set up for?' first. Here is the full quote: "One spouse can demand divorce for no reason, ruin the others entire life, deprive them of access to their children, live in the house that the spouse paid for and still get the spouse's money because they grew accustomed to it. Who is the system set up for?" I simply agreed that it is a good question, but not for the reason you were asking it. The way "system" works in the context of divor…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 08:52 PM
-1	A "Man's World?" "so why are you now asking 'firstly why did you ask that question in the first place?' It was you who said that." Because it wasn't me who said that first. You just misread the conversation. The other person was the first to ask 'who set the system up': "One spouse can demand divorce for no reason, ruin the others entire life, deprive them of access to their children, live in the house that the spouse paid for and still get the spouse's money because they grew accustomed to it. **Who is the syst…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 07:58 PM
-2	Why is it still “funny” when women hit men in shows and movies? Yes, you gave two examples from newer shows and movies. One show and one movie. Your claim was "I’ve been noticing this more and more in TV, in kids’ shows, and even in big movies, and it’s honestly exhausting." If you've been "noticing this more and more in TV," wouldn't this suggest you've been noticing this in recent film and television productions, and not the ones that you watched as a child more than ten years ago? So, no, the ten year time frame I've asked for is not arbitrary. It was giv…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 06:34 PM
-2	A "Man's World?" Just because there were powerful women doesn't automatically mean there were as many powerful women as there were powerful men. What it actually means is these women were exceptions. Many of these women inherited power in the absence of a male heir. So even in upper classes men still had more power than women simply because they outnumbered them. The women that you speak of, such as queens and baronesses, didn't have power on their own. They had power through association. If it doesn't matter wh…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 06:01 PM
-2	Why is it still “funny” when women hit men in shows and movies? I said from the past ten years. Drake & Josh, King of the Hill, Victorious, and Identity Theft were all released before ten years ago, and Spy was exactly ten years ago. And I'm not sure which Looney Toons animations you've seen, considering it'd seem out of character for her to punch anyone in The Looney Toons Show. She has a completely different personality in the Space Jam movies, and even then she doesn't hit anyone in those. That leaves just two examples from the past ten years of a female …	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 05:36 PM
-1	A "Man's World?" The system is generally set up for whoever earns less in the relationship regardless of gender. But you are asking the right question, just for the wrong scenario. You are correct that men are required to sign up for a draft. But who set that system up? The rate of false reporting for sexual assault is consistently low, typically in the range of 2% to 8%. And an even lower percentage is actually prosecuted. In fact, accusations of rape are unlikely to be prosecuted at all considering how difficu…	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 04:40 PM
-4	Why is it still “funny” when women hit men in shows and movies? Can you give any examples of this happening in a film or TV show from the past ten years?	/r/MensRights	15/08/25 04:24 PM
-18	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. What?	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 01:21 PM