TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alchemicore Archive

View 0 posts and 284 comments by alchemicore on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's bestiality
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:34 AM
2

FYI, they edited their comment to say that you blocked them. Look at rule #4. I think the mods ban people for this. Why would you even comment in debate threads if you’re afraid of debate?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:10 AM
13

No it's not. It'd be like if I exclusively date obese women, pretend women under 200lbs don't exist and then claim "all women are fat pigs!" It makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 01:11 PM
1

No it's not. It'd be like if I exclusively date obese women, pretended women under 200lbs don't exist and then said "all women are fat pigs!" It makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 01:10 PM
25

Do you think a beautiful woman is going to have the same mentality as an ugly or deformed woman? I doubt it. How could that possibly be true? The way they interact with other people will be molded by their life experiences. Even if the ugly woman somehow becomes beautiful, she can't just forget her experiences. They are integrated with her identity. So why would you think men are any different? Obviously someone who didn't have options is going to treat women differently than a man who has alway…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 01:07 PM
1

What do you mean? Women still get horny and have sex with men. OP doesn't argue that women exclusively go for men with resources, just that they desire men with resources. This is a relative metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 08:15 PM
1

Women will try to get with the best males available to them. That’s why so many women in poorer countries use the internet to find American men who want to marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:35 PM
-1

You asked why poorer societies reproduce. Did you not pay attention during sex ed? The man puts his penis in the woman's vagina and if they aren't using birth control the woman gets pregnant. Then she will give birth if she does not abort it. Hopefully that clears things up for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:24 PM
0

People in Western countries still reproduce, but women choose to murder their own offspring before they're even born. Over a million abortions happen in the USA every year. If abortion was completely outlawed, we'd be slightly above replacement rate. Obviously access to highly-effective birth control has an effect as well. Over 10% of women have chosen to sterilize themselves here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:16 PM
1

I think women do see personality, it's just that you don't get many chances to show people your personality once you finish school. Do you know anything about the personalities of random women you see and/or briefly interact with? In high school and college, you're forced to be around members of the opposite sex. You see the same faces over and over again. You actually get a chance to learn about peoples' personalities. Outside of work, you don't really get many opportunities like this as an adu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 12:19 PM
1

No, men can't do abortion because they are not women, guess what they can and do en masse? Kill living people who actually don't live off of their bodies. What else could you have possibly meant by this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:51 PM
0

I replied to the claim you made that seemed to imply that you believe men take human lives more often than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:10 PM
1

What trick?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 11:33 AM
1

You engaged with his argument about abortion by responding with something about violence committed by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:56 AM
1

I agree with you that this is off-topic, you should've just said that in your rebuttal. You engaged with his claim regarding abortion which opened this can of worms.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:39 AM
0

You are a clump of cells
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:08 AM
-2

No, I don't think it's okay to kill men. That's why we need to prevent women from killing ~36,500,000 men every single year.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:04 AM
-3

Yeah, I realized that you were going to argue that "people" is a subjective term and edited that out of my comment right before you left this. Why does your opinion of them even matter? They're human beings in an earlier stage of development. Do you think an infant is worth less than a child? Do you think a child is worth less than an adolescent? Do you think an adolescent is worth less than an adult? EDIT: Hey mods, this "bondepart" person replies to people's comments and then blocks them so th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:02 AM
-5

Globally, there are around 450,000 homicides each year. Over 80% of those victims are men. It's primarily men killing other men. Do you have any idea how many human lives are lost through abortion? Around 73 million per year. It's completely insane. So if we include abortions, women are responsible for significantly more male deaths every single year. It's not even remotely comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:56 AM
–

What the hell? This is horrible advice. How could you possibly think this is an effective strategy? It'd be like saying "if you're a porn addict just goon for 3 hours a day bro". More is never enough, your lust can never be satisfied. Most virtuous individuals will eventually change as a result of this. It will be out of disgust, guilt and shame, though. Avoid it. It's much easier to interact with women when you're not so hyper-fixated on sex. Stop obsessing over trying to fuck them, things will…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:14 PM
–

Just stop obsessing over and caring about sex. It doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 11:57 AM
1

Then why does sex feel rewarding even under those circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:16 PM
1

What have I said that is spiritual?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:14 PM
1

What is your point? It obviously doesn't matter if someone is infertile. Do you not understand the hypothetical questions in the first comment you replied to? If the sex feels good to you, then those underlying processes are occurring. Those processes are how we reproduce, so they have a profound effect on individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:42 PM
1

We're discussing why it is a powerful experience. It's powerful because it is the mechanism behind the continuation of life. You seem to be arguing that some species, particularly humans, use it for other purposes (e.g. bonding). I agree with this, so I'm not sure what your point is. The underlying question I asked still remains: Why does your brain release the love hormone during sex? Think about it. Why would pairs bonding be useful for offspring survival? The answer is still oriented around t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:45 AM
2

How is this a rebuttal to anything I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:16 AM
1

I don't mean to offend you, but this is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. It's like you're going out of your way to make some weird nihilistic statement even though it's completely nonsensical. You like dancing in a crowded club because of the energy and sensation? What the fuck? Why is it so hard for you to just admit that there is something profound about sharing experiences with other people? Is the existential meaning you derive from shared experiences the thing you are referring to as …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:23 AM
1

Okay? You're just telling me what you like to do. I asked you why you do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:35 AM
2

I like having orgasms You can have an orgasm by masturbating. Why don't you just fiddle the bean? I like giving other people orgasms. It's almost as if involving another person makes the experience meaningful.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:39 AM
2

You are 100% correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:11 AM
1

Maybe it is when you're beating your own shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:00 AM
3

Then why do these physical processes occur? Why do you have sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 07:58 AM
-1

Can your biology differentiate between sex for fun and sex for reproduction? Can your psyche? Why do you think it feels good? Take a wild guess. Maybe it's because you're engaging in an act that leads to the propagation and continuation of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 07:46 AM
6

Why would that matter? I'm referring to the symbolic weight of the experience. I don't reduce the meaning of sex to reproduction, I just used that as an obvious rebuttal to the guy talking about Mozart. It's the mechanism by which life continues. So even if you are sterilized, it's still a biologically significant event, and your body will treat it as such. Your brain will release bonding chemicals. Your nervous system will start to synchronize with the person you're fucking. Your psychology cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 07:33 AM
3

Right? It's hubris. Sex is a powerful experience because it taps into something that's bigger than us and our egos. It's tied to the origin and continuity of life itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:23 AM
1

Oh really? Listening to Mozart has the potential to produce life? I didn't know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:07 AM
2

Sex is a powerful experience. Treat it responsibly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:43 AM
-1

Love is irrelevant. You should care for your spouse regardless of whether or not you love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:17 PM
0

What specifically are you referring to? There is usually evidence of physical abuse. You must be talking about rape, because that is a bit more difficult to prove. I don't think a significant percentage of men are willing to brutally rape a women, let alone their wives. I mean what the fuck? I doubt most men could even stay hard enough to do that. Do you know what percentage of marriages end in divorce? It's like 50%, and 70% of those are initiated by women. So for you to even think that these i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:56 AM
1

This is probably just a side effect of women marrying the older man for their money. Once they're confident that they can get out and still milk the geezer, they go for it. Would be interesting to see what the rates looked like before the advent of no-fault divorce. I'm sure many of these women genuinely did love their older husbands at one point; however, the prospect of divorce corrupts them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:25 AM
1

No woman wants to be some old man's caretaker when she's only in her 40s. This can happen to anyone regardless of age. The risk of serious illness is obviously higher for older people, but someone can get cancer at the age of 40 and require a care taker. Women are also much more likely to develop chronic "illnesses". Housewives tend to randomly get unexplained conditions that render them helpless, e.g. fibromyalgia.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:19 AM
1

It's not an insult, it's a statement of fact. Let me do to you what you just did to me: You require society to take care of you? Why are you an adult dependent?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 01:09 AM
1

No, that's not what I said. Apparently you can't even read.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 01:04 AM
1

Is that what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:57 AM
1

Social spending that is dwarfed by military and paramilitary spending? This is false. Where do you hear this crap? The majority of our budget is social spending. Defense accounts for <15%.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:56 AM
0

Ok. When America was founded, 10% of the population had the right to vote. The same is applicable to Athens, even though it's widely regarded as the birthplace of democracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:55 AM
3

You contradicted yourself in this comment. You said "wholeheartedly", then proceeded to disagree with the question. Regardless, you're engaging in outcome bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 01:21 PM
1

Do you think that good decisions can ever have bad outcomes?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:24 PM
0

It seems like you're not really understanding me considering you used "education" as an example in this comment. experience in the form of a proven track record What does this even mean? Some people can have a decade of experience on paper yet have less experience than someone who has worked for half that time. Risk adverse boot lickers would be eliminated during the interview(s) process, don’t you think? No, I don't think the hiring process can ever be perfect, because there's no objective way …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:20 PM
1

None of those countries are sustainable either. I'm not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 09:29 AM
0

Yeah, I already know that you're a materialist. You're not really adding anything new to this conversation. You think that humans create societies to satisfy their material needs. Apparently that's the only reason, humans famously lack an existential need for meaning. Thank you for your wonderful philosophical insights into the nature of man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 07:33 AM
3

there's tradeoffs in life! Exactly, that's what I have been telling you. Your worldview is completely nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 07:22 AM
0

You're not even making sense. This is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 07:15 AM
1

You have cognitive dissonance. You care about environmental sustainably, but want to increase social welfare? Why? So that Americans can gorge themselves even more? 70% of us are already overweight. We need less, not more. Do you support free healthcare for all people? Are you not aware of the massive environmental impact that would have?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 07:09 AM
-1

why not? it's all tits up anyway Congratulations! You have boomer mentality. Who cares if future generations have to pay for the debts we incur? Who cares if we steal prosperity from our own progeny? Who cares if people suffer because of our self-serving, childish decisions? you cannot comprehend another grown ass man disagreeing with you Are you right in the head? Clearly I can comprehend it. In the comment you just replied to, I estimated that half of men agree with these policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 07:03 AM
1

Fiat currency is "fake", but resources are real. We don't have unlimited access to the resources you consume.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:55 AM
-2

Let's focus on one example: welfare. Women are significantly more likely than men to support increased spending on social welfare programs. Men have much more disagreement amongst themselves regarding this. If 50% of men support more spending on welfare, but 75% of women do, then society will continue moving in that direction. There are more voters who agree than there are voters who disagree, so representatives campaigning on social spending will win and they will work to implement more of thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:50 AM
-1

Credentials are a weak signal of merit and ability. The system that you're describing would reward obsequious, risk-adverse individuals who excel at following instructions. Are those the people you want leading you? You think putting those people in leadership roles is the ideal we should strive for?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:30 AM
-7

Our society isn't sustainable, it cannot last in its current state. People say that we should repeal the 19th amendment because women vote en-masse for policies that make society unsustainable. Things are going to change eventually, that's inevitable. It might take decades, or even centuries. The changes won't just affect women, a lot of men will lose their rights as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:14 AM
-1

There is no such thing as "real" meritocracy because there's no objective way to measure an individual's "merit".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:09 AM
–

Of course equipment matters, we're embodied beings. Form and matter belong together. If nothing is grounded, then meaning is arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:29 PM
–

What exactly is your point? You're right that it's "it’s based on skill sets" (a better word would be capabilities); however, these are inherently tied to gender. Do you disagree with that? Biology is the entire reason why men are viewed as more expendable than women, so it does come down to sex. A man can impregnate multiple women. Even if women significantly outnumber men, society can still survive. That's the underlying reason why female lives are viewed as more valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:24 PM
–

You're completely missing the point. Those people's lives aren't being put on the line to the same degree as infantry. The military was only brought up as evidence of the fact that society views men as more expendable than women. So really, you're just proving their point for them. That's all you accomplished with this comment. Great work! Even when women do enlist, they're placed into non-combat roles where their lives aren't likely to be at risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:17 PM
–

How would you even know?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:11 PM
1

I think with dads, it's more of like a protective instinct. With moms, it's often them seeking some sort of validation out of their sons and using them as pseudo-husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:29 PM
1

Well, this explains the boy-mom phenomenon. When a mother sees her son, her brain lights up as if he's romancing her! Mommy rizz
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:53 AM
1

You argued that I have a "you can't have any freedom because I need someone to fuck" attitude. You implied that I want to deprive women of their freedom to force them to have sex with me. I don’t give a shit about sex, I’m not a teenage boy. I worry about sub-replacement fertility; however, it’s not even my primary concern. I’m more worried about moral decay, societal cohesion/continuity, debasement of our currency, etc. All of these issues started to spiral out of control once women were grante…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 10:48 PM
1

It's weird how all of you assume that the only reason why a man would believe these things is because he wants to force a woman to have sex with him. That is not true, it's like a bizarre projection. Is that what you want me to believe? Why? This is my worldview because, at the moment, society is extremely unsustainable. We've had liberalization for less than a century and things have already gone to shit. I'm sorry, but this little experiment is not going to last forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:12 AM
1

Your entire world view is incoherent, but sure. I live in fantasy land. Whatever you say! We've experienced 50-100 years of intense liberalization and our society is already unsustainable. Do you not understand that? We clearly cannot support providing women with your lifestyle in perpetuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:52 AM
0

Numerous men faced social consequences over accusations that clearly were not describing assault. The woman who me-too'd Aziz Ansari just described an awkward sexual encounter. He still faced consequences over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:44 AM
0

Well, you could have penis envy. It'd be an unconscious projection, some deep-rooted desire to get your fantastical dick wet. Many such cases. I'm against sex outside of stable, long-term relationships. The institution of marriage isn't super important to me. I don't believe that sex can ever be completely free of consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:37 AM
0

Yeah, I think that men who are rakehells should experience social consequences as well. Why are you asking me this? Society should not support men who fail to assume responsibility. Do you think our current situation is sustainable? Because it's clearly not. Moral decay doesn't benefit women or men. I don't give a shit about "getting my dick wet". Are you projecting?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:20 AM
0

I think promiscuity is bad for society in general. It has negative effects regardless of whether or not the promiscuous individual is male or female. It's just that "harlot" is a term that exclusively applies to women. That's just what the word means. Male equivalent terms would be "philanderer", "womanizer", "rake" or the modern "fuckboy". a lot of women would just stop having sex with anyone I don't think this is true. A lot of women today don't even ask men to wear condoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:34 PM
1

My "scenario" is just how the world worked half a century ago. And no, it had nothing to do with false accusations. You assumed that part. Coercion is oppression No, it's not coercion. You can go live in the wilderness if you want to. Good luck! Maybe you can get a little shack like Uncle Ted. We had a whole era of history (including a war) that cemented that It's as if you're completely unfamiliar with human history. The notion that any specific ideals have been "cemented" is absurd. How does "…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:21 PM
0

No. It’s a word that exclusively applies to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:22 PM
0

Ok. Then surely you don’t think men should be fired when they get me-too’d by women, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:22 PM
1

The jury didn’t even find Trump liable for sexual assault. So you’re clearly either confused or just making things up. This entire case is a joke. Carroll was funded by billionaires like Reid Hoffman. Should’ve never even made it to trial considering it was completely outside of the statute of limitations. Somehow they got the state of New York to TEMPORARILY change its statute of limitations, just for one year.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:16 PM
1

Why don’t you look up what women looked like in Iran before the Revolution
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:07 PM
1

No they wouldn't. Women are completely and totally reliant on men in almost every way. Most would cave and accept that their autonomy was merely an illusion. After all, why don't the women in Muslim countries just "decenter men"? Do you think they're dumber or less capable than Western women? Wow, that's crazy. Why would you think such a horrible thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:13 PM
-2

That's nice buddy. Sadly, none of the women here are going to fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:09 PM
2

She discredited herself when she said "rape is sexy" on national television. Nothing matters because there is no justice. Your idea of "justice" is perverted. That's why it will never be implemented. You don't even understand the difference between civil cases and criminal cases. Sorry, but you're out of your depth here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:07 PM
1

Yes, it is for shits and giggles. The women who do porn are either lazy and/or seeking attention. I suppose some of them might be attempting to fuck with their parents. It’s because you need money to survive Then get a normal job? You people claim that women used to be forced into it because they had no other choice. Women have other options today, yet they still choose to become prostitutes or do porn (which is really just prostitution). There's no excuse. So why do you believe that women had v…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:02 PM
1

I agree, there was no justice. Trump should not have been found liable for that case. It was blatantly made up. E Jean Carroll is a very strange and unreliable woman who was repeatedly caught lying, e.g. she originally claimed that she was wearing a dress that didn't even exist at the time. Please watch this video of her talking to Anderson Cooper: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUAZ0owelrA You'll hear her say this: Most people think of rape as being sexy! Is that a normal or sane thing to say?…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:31 PM
0

What is it an example of? What are you even talking about? You're just sending me meaningless words.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:19 AM
-2

So then you don't think that a woman who has sex with 10 guys over the course of a semester is promiscuous? What the fuck? Are you joking? She'd be having sex with a different guy every 10-12 days. Work me through this logic where a woman can just live without men and support herself Women can't live without men. You believe this because there are layers of abstraction between you and the men who make your lifestyle possible. Walk me through the logic where - in a world where birth rates are fal…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:47 AM
-5

Guilt isn't determined in civil cases. You have no idea what you're talking about. How is it even possible for you to look up the difference, read about it, yet still get it completely wrong? Hahaha What terrible consequences and repercussions this poor man is facing. The only consequence is you making a fool of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:07 AM
-6

Do you think that "harlot" exclusively refers to a prostitute? Why don't you just look it up in a dictionary? You'll notice that there are multiple definitions. One of those definitions is essentially just "promiscuous woman". I realize this might be difficult for you to understand, but words in English often have multiple meanings. Pretty crazy, isn't it? including sterilization Sterilization can be outlawed. It probably should be outlawed. put a baby in a drop box or up for adoption There woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:04 AM
1

Women didn't enter the profession for shits and giggles. Oh really? Then why do women enter the profession for "shits and giggles" today?! There are women who enter the porn industry because they don't want to work a normal job. Or maybe they want to become famous. They have the same rights as men, come from decent families and don't have a sob story justifying their decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:42 AM
-3

The president of the United States of america is a convicted sex offender. No he's not. You're just uneducated and don't understand that civil cases and criminal cases are different things,
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:36 AM
-7

None of your examples were "consequences for harlotry." Yes they were. What are you confused about? The context is very clear from my comment No, it's not clear at all. Are you talking about natural conditions or conditions imposed by other humans? Because the conditions preventing the sexual liberation of women were primarily biological prior to the invention of birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:31 AM
-4

Women always have a better option, that's the entire point. Even back then, a man would've been willing to marry her, provided she wasn't a prostitute. I imagine it was much like it is today, where delusional women were running around saying "I'm a boss bitch and I don't need no man! I can sell my ass to make rent!" Obviously there are exceptions to this. I imagine many victims of rape became prostitutes, which is a horrible thing. I doubt that this applied to the majority of women entering the …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:25 AM
-8

How do you make "dating access" "equal" without revoking consent? There are so many ways a society could do this. The most obvious of which is just making harlotry consequential. Sort of like how if a woman makes an allegation against a man today, he will face repercussions regardless of whether or not he's convicted of a crime. Imagine this: Your boss calls you into their office and says "Hey so we heard that you had sex with 20 dudes. You're fired!!! Get the hell out of here!" Educational inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:10 AM
4

In the past, a woman might've become a prostitute to make some quick cash. She'd then be viewed as a harlot, and would probably be unable to marry a respectable man. In the modern day, a man might be born short and unattractive, or maybe he's of low status. He's completely unable to find a girlfriend, let alone a wife. You're right, these situations aren't comparable. Unless the man is a loser as a result of his own actions (gambling, drinking, etc), then his situation can't be compared to that …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 07:57 AM
–

Attraction matters more because sexuality rooted in evolution looks for health and symmetry. I agree with most of what you said, but I don't think this is always the case. A lot of men want to fuck their cousins, which is absolutely not a viable long-term mating strategy for good health or symmetry. Your great-grandchildren will be goofy ahh habsburg jaw lookin' ass freaks
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:57 AM
–

Are there any aspects of your looks that changed?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:28 AM
–

You've been in a relationship with your high school girlfriend for 11 years. You don't even know what it's like to date as an adult. You live in a bubble. That's not a bad thing, it's good that you guys stuck together. But it makes this post seem a bit delusional. When you're in high school, you're forced to be around members of the opposite sex on a daily basis. The same people, almost every day, for eight hours. You witness more of each other's personalities. You're forced to interact with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:26 AM
1

It was just a normal physical activity I did to get off or to get my ego up. So you were using sex to regulate your self-esteem, but it wasn't having a profound impact on you? This doesn't make any sense, it's a contradiction. Both of those things cannot be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:13 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. If you're actively engaged with the experience, I think that it can be in one of two ways: You're "having sex with someone you're in love with" and it feels very passionate and beautiful, almost as if you're coalescing together and transcending individuality. Or you're having chaotic, animalistic sex with someone purely for pleasure. You're acting on instinct because it feels good, losing your inhibitions, and just going at it like monkeys. Both ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 11:46 AM
1

If you agree that it can be a very powerful experience, then we have no disagreement. I don't believe that sex is a powerful experience 100% of the time. There are obvious exceptions to that, e.g. if you're drunk, impaired or dissociated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 11:04 AM
1

Why would you hold other people to a different standard than the one you hold yourself to? At least explain your logic to me. How are any of these problems the result of capitalism? Housing costs have been driven up by zoning laws. People, especially older people, treat their homes as investments. They petition local governments to block new constructions, because less homes artificially inflates the value of their home. So if the problem is governments restricting supply, how is that the fault …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:45 PM
1

Oh really? Where’s the causative evidence for that claim? The US was a capitalist country for a long time before we had these issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:34 PM
-1

Why would I need a therapist? I bet most men agree with me. Have you heard of spit-fermented alcohol? Traditionally made in Japan and Peru by chewing up grains and spitting them into jars. The enzymes in spit break down the grains into sugar, which can then feed bacteria for fermentation. Guess what? In both cultures, they had women do the chewing and spitting. These are two completely disconnected cultures, with an entire ocean between them. Yet, they both came to the conclusion that it's okay …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:58 AM
-2

That's exactly right! Women are best suited for support roles. The best part is, if the woman is reasonably attractive, she can feed me slop and I will still eat it! She could spit in my drink, rub her feet all over my sandwich, I don't even care! That sounds great to me! She could perform depraved acts with phallic vegetables, then serve them to me without even rinsing them off! I would still eat them. In fact, I'd like them even more! Now, if a guy made me some food and it tasted like shit, I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:35 AM
1

I'm going to pick 1977, when people were sexually liberated, there hasn't been any level of progress in science in tech? That's your stance? I hate to break it to you, but the rate of technological advancement in the West has slowed since the 1970s. Look it up if you don't believe me. We've obviously seen advancements in computing, but progress has stagnated elsewhere. Since liberation there has been growth in all those areas you say are floundering. Dude, I don't know if you live under a fuckin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:17 AM
-1

Your problem is that you have zero indication if being sexual liberal is the reason for that decline. Okay? I'm not trying to prove causation. Nor do you have a clear and unambiguous definition of whatever the hell "high civilizational output" is. I'm referring to the productive outputs of a civilization. Progress in science/technology, cultural achievement, economic production, etc. Do you think that there's no way to determine whether or not a civilization was flourishing at a specific point i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:14 AM
-1

I don’t think they’re helpless, just playing with fire. Which part of my comment do you disagree with? Let’s start with this: Do you disagree with my belief that sex is a powerful experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:18 PM
0

How could it possibly not have anything to do with sex? Sex triggers biological and emotional attachment mechanisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:14 PM
-1

Give me a single historical example of a society that sexually liberalized and maintained high civilizational output. One example. You can find a myriad of examples of civilizations that became sexually permissive at their peak (Classical Athens, Rome, Renaissance Italy, the modern West) and then immediately began to decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 07:05 PM
0

I've already explained the social consequences to you multiple times. I'm not going to keep doing it. I asked you some questions because answering them would help you understand the negative social effects. You flat out ignored me. So either you're struggling to comprehend my comments, or you're not actually looking for an answer. I'm inclined to believe it's the latter, but you're wasting my time in either situation. Again, a strangers actions do not affect you. This is blatantly false and comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 12:33 PM
-2

I literally just gave you an example of how it harms society. Did you read my comment or not? You ended on good terms with every single person you've ever had sex with? Really? You never damaged anyone? You have never been damaged yourself? It's just a complete fantasy. The only situation where overt promiscuity can occur and not be overtly harmful is probably in retirement communities, where are a bunch of geriatrics are fuckin before they croak. They've lived ordered lives for 70 years, they'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:40 AM
-7

Sexual promiscuity does harm society and individuals who engage in it. It's not a healthy, productive or stable expenditure of energy. As I just stated, it is the definition of social entropy. It causes fragmentation and disorder within communities. How old are you? This is a genuine question. Do you not understand that your actions have consequences? Do you feel compelled to act responsibly? Sex is one of the most powerful experiences you can share with another human. If someone really enjoys i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:52 AM
-6

Why not? It's social entropy. Civilization is only possible when humans renounce their instincts. What’s society got to do with a persons dating life Do you not know what a society is? It's a collective of individuals. The relationships you have with other people are society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:15 AM
2

People often reverse-engineer reasons to justify actions that they already want to take. The desire to abandon prior obligations comes first, then the complaint is constructed as a moral rationalization. This is especially true for grievances like "I wasn't valued/respected/loved". These things are practically impossible to measure, and often the person making the grievance can't even explain what they're referring to. It's just "I don't feel valued".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:51 AM
-10

It'd help the woman, and society in general. It's not good or healthy to go out fuckin' a bunch of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:34 AM
0

I think in most cases, the opposite of what you are describing is true. Even if the guy isn't getting laid as often as his ex, he's more likely to be at peace with their break up. In fact, if the woman is going out and fucking a bunch of guys, that sort of implies that she's dealing with some psychological issues as a result of the break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:32 AM
1

I know what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:18 AM
-1

That’s…. Not what empathy means. Yes it is. Empathy isn’t feeling the exact same pain as someone dying of cancer. Are you hallucinating? I didn't say that it was, you just made this up. I said that empathy is "sharing feelings with other people". Empathy, to put it simply, refers to the ability to put yourself in someone else’s shoes to a degree. You can do this passively. What you're describing is sympathy, not empathy. From that link: Empathy more precisely means that one is able to feel anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:17 AM
-2

What you said is normal, obviously you care about your family more than you care about random outsiders you've never even met before. Empathy is a grossly misused term. It's supposed to mean that you're sharing feelings with other people. For example, if your dad is dying of cancer, you're literally suffering alongside him. That's "empathy". If some guy you don't really know gets cancer, you might feel bad for him and his family, but are you wallowing in despair and misery? Probably not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:36 AM
5

What she said is completely normal. We're a tribal species, and our instincts bias empathy towards people who we consider to be apart of our tribe. If someone claimed that they emphasize with random people as much as they empathize with their own family, I'd question their sincerity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:24 AM
1

Do you enjoy going on incoherent, vapid rants? Does it feel cathartic to you? I don't care what you think. Stop wasting your time, for your own sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:31 AM
1

than just asking “are you depressed? Okay whatever you say!” Oh, so you changed your mind? The fact that it's an intangible category is no longer what matters to you? It's the process by which we attribute things to the intangible? It is not your place to tell women virginity is the big deal you clearly think it is. I don't make the rules. You and your ilk can LARP about how you don't care, yet disorder still manifests from within. You project it out onto the external world as a cry for help. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 11:06 AM
1

The word “deflower” means to “take away the prime beauty of”. According to who?! Are you just making this shit up?! Have you ever heard this word used in that fashion? Oh, I see where you're getting this. It's the secondary definition on Merriam Webster. What a fucking joke. So you saw that the primary definition of the word was "to deprive of virginity", yet decided to ignore it in favor of the secondary definition? it’s pretty disturbing you think fucking someone damages them Oh my god, I'm ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:29 AM
1

The term is de-flowering, not “changing”... Absolutely nobody by you is making up this “it doesn’t really mean ruined” aspect Dude, the meaning is in the term itself. It's saying that a specific thing, the "flower", is being destroyed. The "flower" is the woman's innocence, purity, virginity - not her entire state of being. You're the one who keeps applying it to the entire woman. The term is clearly NOT saying that woman is fucking ruined!! I don't know why this is so difficult for you to under…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 12:45 PM
1

who think a woman is ruined by by having sex The term doesn't imply that sex "ruins" women. Just that it changes them. You're the one who is inferring the "ruin" aspect. why you used the language that implies a woman is no longer a worthwhile human being after losing her virginity Losing your virginity is an irreversible act. For most people, it's a transformative event of great significance. It represents the loss of their innocence, the end of their transition into maturity. That's the underly…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 01:30 AM
-1

I don't think you're being genuine. This is an anonymous forum, you don't have to do so much posturing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 01:44 PM
0

What the hell are you talking about? There's nothing disgusting about it, "deflower" is a very common term. Just take a deep breath, there's no need to get upset over a word. Humans have been drawing this analogy for thousands of years because it is meaningful. Are the implications of the underlying meaning why you're so offended? Then get a grip, everybody loses their innocence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 01:34 PM
-1

Are you capable of sincerity?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 12:13 PM
0

How is this relevant? It has absolutely nothing to do with my comment, I argued that women appear to care a lot about their first relationships. It has nothing to do with their first boyfriend being an "alpha". I think they care about him because they have a special connection. They were each other's first love and lost their virginity together. This isn't even an attack on women, these are virtuous traits. The person who deflowers you should be significant to you, and men shouldn't just discard…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:44 AM
1

I don't think this is unique to men and often it's regarding a relationship that they sabotaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:17 AM
2

You can't walk away from multiple first relationships. рук иаа Ah, the old Cyrillic slip. Your first boyfriend being drafted into some shit war and/or dying of alcoholism before the age of 20 doesn't count as you "walking away".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:54 AM
0

she walked away for a reason I don't know a single woman who "walked away" from her first relationship. Not one. Some of my friends are STILL being contacted by their high school girlfriends, and it's been a decade. Do you personally know any women who went to a specific university because they wanted to be near their high-school boyfriend, but then the guy started treating them like shit and ended the relationship? Leaving them stuck at that university for no reason? That sounds oddly specific,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:41 AM
1

Why not? I've had a guy consentually cut me before. Is this a rhetorical question? Or do you actually want to dive into the philosophy of it? If you want to, then I'd start by asking you a simple question: Do you believe that people with severe mental disabilities are moral agents? Should they be held to the same moral standards as you and I? Or do you believe that they have a limited capacity to discern right from wrong? This may seem irrelevant, but it's actually very important. Are tattoos ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 11:14 PM
1

Please read this part of my comment: If someone who self-harms asked you to drag a razor blade across their skin, would you do it? Why not? They're consenting and want you to do it. They enjoy it. My question to you is, where do you draw the line? Would you do anything to anyone if you both found it pleasurable?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:36 PM
1

If your community pays you, feeds you and shelters What the fuck? I am not on welfare. I don't get free housing or food. My community does indirectly house and feed me, though. Your community does the same for you. You didn't build your house and you don't grow your own food. Women were dependent because they weren’t allowed by law Why is it so difficult for you to understand everything? Human motives PRESUPPOSE the law. Laws are human inventions, they only exist when humans decide to implement …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:33 PM
2

I mean when things were face to face Doms had a community where they practised some kind of ethics. Where after care was a recognised and expected thing. That's gone There's nothing ethical about humiliating and harming other people for your own sexual pleasure. It doesn't even matter if the victim likes it, it's still morally outrageous and indicative of extreme psychological issues. If someone who self-harms asked you to drag a razor blade across their skin, would you do it? Why not? They're c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:59 PM
0

This is crazy, do you work for free? Yes, I built and still maintain something for my community that people enjoy. I can't really explain it in detail without doxxing myself because it's pretty specific and there are local news articles regarding it. I don't consider it to be "for free". I benefit from my community, so I view it as me fulfilling my obligations to the people around me. I already explained this to you multiple times, why is this concept so difficult for you to understand? Apparent…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:54 AM
1

What are you even talking about? How could money be "the biggest value"? Do you not understand what money is? We all do our bit and we use money as currency to keep it going. Taxes are to pay for essential services, that's really it. How exactly does money "keep it going"? Do you pay people to be your friend? A society is just a group of individuals. People, and their mutual obligations to each-other, are what "keep it going". Societies existed before the invention of money. We all do our bit It…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:53 AM
1

child mortality... incredible achievement... I'm weary of you making an overall claim of superiority regarding this. We really have no idea what sort of unforeseen consequences modern, godlike medical intervention has on our genome. It's too soon to tell whether or not this is a net positive. Have you heard of the hygiene hypothesis? If it's true, then we've started to see negative consequences in just a few generations. Obviously the good still vastly outweighs the bad; however, what will the e…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:17 AM
1

Once again, money is an abstract human concept. Do you not understand how it works? It has no value unless the society that issues it has value. So if everyone merely contributed in the form of taxes, we'd end up with a worthless pile of money in the center of a dead civilization. Great! You're just inventing all of these nonsensical arguments because you can't accept the fact that the lifestyle you advocate for is parasitic, even though it clearly is. You enjoy the benefits of a society that on…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:58 AM
-1

the first where most children saw all of their siblings become adults Technically not even true. It's estimated that 50-75% of conceptions end in miscarriage. The woman doesn't even realize that she flushed a zygote down into the underworld, where it will spend an eternity floating amongst shit and piss. That's why I say 3 hail marys and 2 our fathers every time I use the bathroom after a woman. I get down on my hands and knees and pray. "Please god please save that baby's soul". Even if it smel…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:38 AM
1

I don't know how anyone even remotely familiar with human history could come to this conclusion. What we see is societies temporarily becoming more pluralist and liberal, then snapping back into a rigid, fundamentalist state. Over and over again. We see this pattern because hierarchical societies are a reflection of nature. Regardless of whether or not you draw an imaginary line between civilization and nature, we are still apart of it. So the systems we design only really succeed when they conf…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 03:47 AM
0

Give your sex more credit, women aren't going to be "crushed" by men. You have an innate ability to influence and control men, it's just more psychological in nature. Even in a patriarchal societies, men don't unidirectionally control women. Women exert control over men as well. I wouldn't even describe it as women "pushing back against control from men", because that miscategorizes it as an act of defense. It's more like two natural forces that oppose each-other colliding to achieve balance. yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 02:35 AM
-1

Okay, let's evaluate this. I have over 5000 years of recorded human history backing up my position. Patriarchy produces societies that are so stable, they last for millennia. What have you got? The last 50-100 years? Great, the results have been disastrous. In the grand scheme of things, this liberal overstep will be reflected upon as nothing more than a short-lived, failed experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 12:15 AM
0

What do I care?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 12:08 AM
-3

There are more than eight billion people on Earth. Apparently you don't even understand what a society is. you're just trying to invent a narrative under which someone is obligated to fuck you Stop projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 12:08 AM
-1

Making sacrifices for society is called taxes. How could you possibly believe this nonsense? Money is an abstract human concept, it has no intrinsic value. A society wouldn't work if the only "sacrifices" made monetary. I just don't understand how you've worked this out in your head. Please walk me through your thought process.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 12:05 AM
-5

Yes, but you also have a duty to ensure that your children are raised in a stable environment. Not necessarily financial stability, just familial stability. Both parents should be present and able to maintain a healthy relationship. This applies to both sexes. It clearly applies to men, we imprison fathers who attempted to escape their paternal duties. What about those people who are medically unable? Then they wouldn't be expected to reproduced. There are other ways that they can contribute. Le…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 11:53 AM
-9

Is it oppression? Or is it merely having different societal roles and expectations for men and women? It seems like you believe that any and all restrictions are "oppression". Constraint and personal sacrifice are a necessary aspect of any functional society. Radical autonomy destroys the very conditions that make autonomy possible. Your autonomy can only exist in a society where individuals accept their roles and expectations - including you. Society itself is basically just a network of humans…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:55 AM
-2

Yes, of course our system is unbalanced. All you need to do is look around at the state of things. men have all of the responsibility but none of the authority This is correct, women do not have the same responsibilities men have, yet they have all of the same rights. Men don't even have a guarantee of bodily autonomy, that's one of the sacrifices they make to vote. The entirety of society doesn't hold women responsible to the same degree that it holds men responsible, especially not when they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:23 AM
–

People would acknowledge your achievements if you ever actually achieved anything of consequence. Your mentality just seems childish to me. What are you even hoping for? You want people to tell you that everything you do is great, like when you were a little kid? I hate it to break it to you, but your parents were lying. Your macaroni art was not that good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 12:58 PM
–

No, the roots causes aren't "a cycle of poverty, trauma and lack of education ". Most of these things are side effects of the actual underling cause. Psychological traits (intelligence, risk averseness, etc) are highly heritable. So if a woman is stupid and lets guys nut in her, her daughter might do the same. Or if she just is more likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors, there's a good chance her daughter will have the same proclivities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 01:43 PM
0

Ok, sure. This is just another one of your delusions. How do you even think it's possible for us to live in a "post-scarcity world"? What are you, fuckin nuts? Do you not understand the nature of reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:07 AM
1

Your value system is completely fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:28 AM
0

Okay? Then go live with the Amish. Nobody is forcing you to care about money. Nobody is forcing you to be a mindless consumer. The world would be better off if we lived in a post-scarcity world. That's physically impossible. You can't survive without consuming resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 03:22 AM
1

Okay? The medical terminology for "miscarriage" is completely irrelevant. The differences between an abortion and miscarriage are clear: one is the intentional killing of a human, the other is not. Why would you even attempt to compare those two situations? Are you deranged? Imagine if a drunk driver crashed into your car and accidentally killed themselves. In response, I said "Oh, I know exactly how you feel. One time I murdered a guy and cut him into tiny pieces." Would that make any sense at …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 12:24 PM
1

I don't think this tradition is linked much to financial dynamics. Are you high? For most of human history, marriage was viewed as an economic institution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:10 AM
2

The primary reason why the bride's family paid a dowry was to protect her economically. Obviously it benefited the groom as well. For example, if it was a piece of land, he could use it to raise livestock. However, it would be one of the only assets that his wife actually had some control over. Usually he wouldn't be allowed to just sell it and get money.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:08 AM
1

men would often propose to their prospective spouse's dads This is completely absurd, most fathers weren't forcing their daughters to marry men they chose for them. The vast majority of dads love their children and don't want them to be raped. In most cases, if the daughter's family had any input at all, they would be discussing the possibility of marriage with the suitor and his family. This was just to help guide the daughter, the choice was still hers to make. Arranged marriages are not force…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:01 AM
0

I would not find it embarrassing at all. I would find it weird, though. Possibly even a bit entitled, but it depends on the circumstances. Historically speaking, men proposed because they were the ones adopting risk. He would have to provide for his wife and future family, he'd be taking on a lot of responsibilities. This is still how it works in most cases. The majority of men make more than their wives and had more premarital assets. Even if they're both working and have similar incomes, it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 02:26 AM
1

you’re either paying through taxes or in your theory through time and labor to support these people Most people trade their time/labor for money, which is then taxed. Why do you keep saying things that are so fucking stupid? Do you even think before you type? They shouldn’t have to jump through hoops to get help from their local community Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 08:17 PM
1

No it's not. You can't form an argument because you have no idea what you're talking about. Your political opinions revolve around taking resources for yourself by stealing them from other people, yet you have the gall to claim that I'm the individualist. It's incoherent and deranged.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 12:50 PM
1

Individualism has killed our communities Then why the fuck are you advocating for individualism? The only reason why you'd prefer centralized welfare is because it makes social capital obsolete. Individuals can do whatever they want and still receive support. They can treat their neighbors like shit and still be indirectly supported by them, because the government acts as a middleman. If you rely on your community for support, then you need to form relationships with the people around you and co…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 12:34 PM
1

"Caveman mentality right here. Self preservation at its finest. Now give me more free shit. I need more free shit for myself, but you're the caveman. I'm going to force you to give me your shit because I want it, but trust me bro, you're the caveman." Is there something wrong with you? You're clearly the one who is promoting self-preservation over community. You support policies that directly cause the atomization of society. Centralized welfare destroys communities. When we no longer have to re…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 11:30 AM
1

My goal is not to degrade you, I just fundamentally disagree with your worldview. I think that the things you advocate for are deteriorating society. Centralized welfare weakens communities. It makes our localized support systems obsolete. Instead of relying on the people around you for support, you rely on an abstract entity. As a result, people have been becoming more and more alienated. So I think it is selfish for people to argue that they should receive more support from the government. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:58 AM
1

Routine bloodwork usually doesn't test for vitamin deficiencies. You underestimate how quickly health issues can totally fuck up your life. I just don't care. Even fucking cavemen took care of their weakest members Early humans lived in extremely small, tight-knit communities that resembled extended families. So thanks, you're proving my point for me. It's not natural for humans to be supported by people outside of their community. You shouldn't expect people you've never met to support you. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 01:29 AM
0

Autism, ADHD, depression/anxiety, and fibromyalgia You have been diagnosed with multiple mental disorders and a syndrome. None of your "disabilities" are even tangible medical conditions, they're all conceptual categories. Symptoms include slurred speech, blurry vision, vertigo, numbness/tingling, and confusion. Sounds like anxiety. If you had a tangible medical condition, e.g. MS, you probably would've been diagnosed with it by now. Could also be a vitamin deficiency, especially B12. Do you eat…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 10:24 PM
2

Why would men want empathy from women? Men already subsidize women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:18 PM
1

If I was diagnosed with a terminal illness, I'd just let myself die. My philosophy is pretty simple, really. We shouldn't keep people alive when the prognosis is hopeless. We shouldn't keep people alive when their bodies want to give up and they are suffering. I lost my mom to cancer when I was pretty young. Modern medicine could not save her, it only prolonged her suffering. I often think that our current approach to medicine is not healthy or even humane. If we lived a century ago, my mother w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:15 PM
1

I'm having a good day today, but I'm totally unable to function on bad days. What even is your "disability"? Sloth? BTW, my dad is helping me out, but he's 75 years old. Absolutely brutal. I'm a bit too old to be on my parent's insurance. Even more more brutal. I'm not even straight my guy Oh god Even if I could, I'm not willing to play some poor shmuck for benefits, and I'm not willing to sell my body for it either What societal utility do you have, then? Nothing? Really? There must be somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:04 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:50 PM
-2

I'm defending my own interests
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:49 PM
-4

Not my problem. If you need contacts or glasses that's on you buddy. Or get Lasik surgery. Lasik is another example of a highly complex procedure that is remarkably cheap because the government has not subsidized it. It's like $5000. Imagine what it would cost in a hospital. Probably $100k.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:36 PM
2

Exactly! We should let everyone exist and not parasitically leech off of each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:33 PM
1

tAx ThE wEaLtH Or you could just find a husband
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:33 PM
0

If you need $6k to get a bunch of dental work done, then save up for it. Or just have your teeth pulled. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:32 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:31 PM
3

Wrong, women receive more welfare even without children. Single women make less than single men. They also have worse credit scores. Also, our society subsidizes the elderly more than it subsidizes children. We spend more per capita on old people. Men have shorter life expediencies than women. Women start to outnumber men around the age of 50. So, we spend a ton of money on old ladies (who obviously don't have dependents).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:30 PM
1

A filling is like $100-300. It's extremely cheap. If you absolutely need something akin to insurance, you can budget $20/mo for a dental plan. Certainly not the person who literally can't work due to disability right now. I don't care. You can work at a call center from home. Why do you expect other people to subsidize your life? Welcome to the land of the "Fuck you, I've got mine." In reality, this is your mentality. You want to steal from people you don't even know to subsidize your life. Why …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:17 PM
-4

No, it’s the land of “be a responsible adult”. Dental and vision are affordable because the government hasn’t subsidized them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:01 PM
-1

You should be happy your plan doesn’t cover dental care and vision. They’re actually affordable as a result of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:00 PM
2

Men are the ones subsidizing women. Not the other way around. Men pay more in taxes and receive less welfare than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 07:41 PM
10

They don't even see rude behavior or bigotry as a problem The guy in the video rejected the trans woman by popping her balloon for her. How the fuck is this "rude behavior or bigotry"? The entire point of this "game show" is people rejecting others by popping a balloon! Apparently it's only rude when the man is the one popping the balloon. When the "woman" does it, you think it's perfectly acceptable. Within the context of the game show, this man did not do anything wrong. He was just being upfr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 10:29 AM
1

I agree with what you're saying. However, when you gloat about how much your marketing agency makes, you're going to lose credibility in the eyes of many people. Marketing agencies are the most common "businesses" started by wantrepreneurs because the barrier to entry is non-existent. Every single LARPer I've met who claimed to be a successful business owner had a marketing agency (usually internet marketing).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:22 AM
3

outpacing men in education Education does not guarantee a person success. Generally speaking, it doesn't even really imply that they're planning for their future. Many students only go because they don't know what else to do after high school. Regarding the metrics specifically being discussed, education ends up harming a lot of people more than it helps them. Women who get art degrees might end up working low skill, low pay jobs. They're arguably in a worse situation than their "uneducated" cow…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:14 AM
11

Young women are more likely to be NEETs than young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 12:49 PM
5

I have no idea what you’re even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 12:47 PM
12

boys and men are getting “left behind” and rotting in their mother’s basement It's not a large percentage of the men, only about 12% of them between the ages of 18 - 24 are like this. Young women are actually more likely to have a NEET lifestyle (out of school, no job, living with parents). That's pretty funny considering women have been the benefactors of affirmative action for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 12:12 PM
7

Women will manipulate men into committing violence against other men. "If you dump me, my older brother will beat the shit out of you!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 12:06 PM
7

Women are valued for their achievements when they actually achieve things of consequence. They just do that less than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:57 AM
6

What have you achieved
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:56 AM
14

Yes they do
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:53 AM
18

How dare a woman want to date a guy with a job, a plan and a basic idea of looking after himself and his future. Most men meet this criteria. These are not the expectations of the women in question. If they were, then the majority of men would easily find partners. You're either arguing in bad faith or blatantly lying, because I guarantee that you know that many women filter out men based on their immutable characteristics (e.g. height).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:53 AM
4

Well, I disagree with you. I doubt most passport bros have copious amounts of wealth. They might be established (e.g. own a house), but if they had millions of dollars and didn't care about whether or not their wife was essentially a prostitute (according to you), they could easily find someone in the USA willing to play along. What you're saying just doesn't make any sense. If a woman is from some impoverished country, merely living in the USA would be amazing. You think some Filipina from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 11:20 AM
0

I don't think it's prostitution. Well, if the guy is completely disgusting, then maybe it is. I'm pretty sure these marriages have lower rates of divorce than the general population. The wife can get permanent residency after 2 years of marriage, then divorce his ass without ever being deported. So if they're all just with the men for money, why wouldn't most of them do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 09:52 AM
–

I'm trying to understand what your underlying beliefs are, because what you've told me so far is a bit nonsensical. I get that romantic preferences don't always make sense, though. I'm also arguing against your opinions, because I find them life denying. That doesn't mean I'm trying to change what you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 11:58 AM
–

Hunting and fishing are very good for conservation, arguably crucial. They are better for local wildlife than agriculture (growing crops, raising meat). Farms are horrible for the environment, even "sustainable" farming requires deforestation and the destruction of complex ecosystems. So you're saying that you're not attracted to the personality traits a man might have if he enjoys shooting deer and/or catching and eating fish? If that's the case, I don't understand why you would be okay with so…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 10:41 AM
–

To own. What do you mean "to date"?! You can't fuck an ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:58 AM
–

I don't really understand this logic. You benefit from animals being harmed all of the time. So do you just want to live in blissful ignorance? Are you vegan? What do you eat, grains and beans? Without pest control, you'd be consuming quite a lot of insects... And significantly more rodent piss and shit than we all already consume.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:27 AM
–

Would you settle for a donkey?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:06 AM
3

Why do you want random men to spend money on you? Are you an escort?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:05 AM
1

US immigrants weren't always from the countries you mentioned, obviously. This is a pretty recent change, so we haven't experienced the bulk of the negative effects yet. Would you prefer to live in Mexico, India, China or the Philippines?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 02:04 PM
1

Dude, if you said this to me in public I'd probably pull down your pants and spank your bare ass
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 12:06 PM
–

Doesn't seem like it. I rarely see men taking this concept seriously. The only example I can really think of is that "Healthy Gamer" guy, but he's a psychiatrist or something. All mental health professionals are shills, they invent problems then try to sell you a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 11:02 PM
–

this leads to women being murdered I'm not even sure what you're talking about. Angry virgin men doing mass shootings? which is why so many women no longer put the onus on men at all, and would rather not enter relationships or marriages with men at all anymore What does one of these things have to do with the other? You say women are at risk of being murdered by antisocial freaks. Then say this is why they won't date normal men? It'd be like if I argued nobody should have children with women be…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 10:53 PM
–

What? I said articles, not videos. Google “male loneliness epidemic” and see for yourself. Obviously it’s primarily discussed by women, they think about this shit more than men do. Most mental health professionals and patients are women. Over 75% of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 02:24 PM
–

Google the term and count the number of articles written by females vs males.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:32 PM
–

When I Google "male loneliness epidemic", over half of the articles were written by women. Almost all of the videos containing men are them criticizing the concept. So no, it doesn't seem like men are the ones who are seriously discussing this topic. It's obviously been primarily discussed by women. They're more interested in these topics, so that makes sense. 70% of mental health professionals are women and 75% of people receiving mental health services are women. Men don't think about this shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:12 PM
–

When I look up "male loneliness epidemic", the majority of people discussing it are women. I'm not even joking, search that on Google. Over half of the articles were written by women. Now click on the videos tab, what do you see? Most of the videos made by men are of them criticizing the concept, with titles like "there is no male loneliness epidemic". So what are you even talking about? Who are you referencing? Are you just making shit up? This does not appear to be a concept predominately disc…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:04 PM
-2

Are men the ones discussing this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 05:46 AM
-7

Are they complaining? The only videos I’ve seen of men crying are like shell shocked veterans
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:35 PM
2

Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:34 PM
-2

Men send each other memes too. And socialize well. They just act differently when under your watchful eye because you’d probably judge them for how they interact. That’s why you’ve never observed them. You sound like a teenage boy claiming the girls make out with each other in their locker room. How would you have any idea how men behave when you’re not around?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:29 PM
–

Men don't think like this. They just don't. I don't care at all if a woman is good at sex and never have. I think it's stupid to view sex as a skill.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:33 PM
–

Expectations aren't preferences, so this is completely irrelevant. A man can prefer women to be virgins but expect them not to be. Same thing with your statement on rarity. It has nothing to do with your original claim. Those men aren't changing their preferences, they are settling. You're just sending me nonsense, the final paragraph makes that clear. You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:28 PM
–

Oh really? Then how are these women losing their virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:53 AM
–

That's not even the part I was pointing out. Your claim that men "are actually more likely to prefer a girl not to be a virgin" is just wrong. It's not true at all. Do you genuinely believe this? You think most men would pick a woman with a body count of 20 over a virgin? Really? Regardless, I don't even agree with your "most men don't care" claim, so we can argue about that as well. I think most men do care, but not enough for it to be a deal breaker. They might be bothered by the fact that the…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:52 AM
–

Majority of men don’t give a shit and are actually more likely to prefer a girl not to be a virgin This is just factually inaccurate. You're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:58 AM
–

It's only "useless" if you've already been corrupted. If your priorities are straight, and you care about things that actually matter (e.g. maintaining a life-long relationship, building a family, etc), then it's extremely beneficial. You're much less likely to end up divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:50 AM
6

It didn't used to be like this. Western societies were specifically designed to prevent our current predicament, not reinforce it. The vast majority of medieval people got married, including the peasants. You could be an assetless serf and still secure some huzz. That's why people used to be so against polygamy. If a single CHAD hogs five women, you have four angry men. They tarred and feathered Joseph Smith, then decided to lynch him for good measure. His crime? Having multiple wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:02 AM
2

Not necessarily. In the past, the woman's family used to pay a dowry to her husband. Sometimes because they needed to convince him to marry her, although that wasn't the primary purpose. Really, the source of this disparity is the fact that modern people view marriage as an individual choice. Outside of some communities, women don't feel pressure to marry, so men are the ones seeking to convince them. I imagine that in the future, marriage will return to being viewed as an essential social insti…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:49 AM
5

What are you even talking about? You're not making any sense. According to you, driverless cars indicate that we'll eventually have biological computers that can perfectly mimic female humans? This is completely absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 10:48 AM
3

This just sounds like a way for you to cope with your own failures. The future you're envisioning is not going to happen, so it's really just a fantasy. Don't fail to assume personal responsibility. Hopefully it's not too late for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 10:43 AM
2

Keep it in your pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 10:36 AM
–

Hysterical. You have no idea what you're talking about. If you don't think it's a unique human organism before viability (which isn't even a pinpointable moment), then what the hell is it? An inanimate object, even though its cells are replicating? How could you say something so stupid? Use your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:53 AM
1

You keep calling me delusional, but your entire argument is completely deranged. You're just wrong. Men and women both have a duty to reproduce and raise families so that our society has continuity. What you're advocating for is effectively suicide, you realize that? People who share your beliefs should be viewed as moral failures and cast out because it's literally impossible for your ideology to produce a functional society. Ultimately your belief system is either going to fade away into obscu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:45 AM
–

Well, the pedos aren't the only flawed individuals. Leadership at the organization is flawed as well, albeit not as deeply. Covering up sexual abuse cases is, once again, a really common phenomenon in public schools. It's specifically referred to as "passing the trash" within our educational system. If you look up that phrase, you'll find a ton of articles and news segments about it. A lot of people don't know this, but our public schools did/do the same exact shit the Catholic church did. These…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:26 PM
1

No offense, but I don’t really understand how an adult could require so much support to graduate college and also be a top performer at their job. Why would she require support in school but not at work?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:43 PM
–

Well, it’s a scientific fact that human life starts at conception. When else would it start?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:41 PM
1

Tutors are fine. Extra time to turn in assignments or complete exams are not fine. Why would you even think she deserves those things? You’re basically just assuming that she’s less capable than her peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 02:38 PM
–

She received academic accommodations in grade school? Surely you understand why the standards at grade schools shouldn't be as rigid as the standards at universities, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 02:10 PM
–

This is just inaccurate. Factual recall is not the only thing being tested. The constraints are supposed to test how well you perform under pressure. Also your time management skills and your ability to quickly read and comprehend instructions. A myriad of your skills and attributes are being tested. Obviously the necessary requirements for most profession aren't solely regarding your ability to recall information over an indefinite period of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 02:08 PM
1

Are university exams meant to measure an individual's vision? Or their cognitive abilities and knowledge? If someone went to an optometrist, and they wanted to assess their natural vision, should they perform the eye exam while wearing contact lenses? Or would that defeat the purpose? This is a waste of time. I feel like conversing with you is making me lose brain cells. If you're not trolling, then I feel sorry for you. This is never going to be productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 01:43 PM
–

Because it defeats the purpose of the test?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 01:34 PM
1

Wrong. Our society is below replacement rate. It cannot sustain itself at the moment. Apparently you've never heard of forced fatherhood. Men can be deceived, it happens all of the time. Even if they didn't have fatherhood forced upon them, they ultimately don't have a choice in the matter. Women have the final say. It is comparable. Women have societal responsibilities. If they refuse to help ensure the continuity of the society they live in, then they are actively harming it. Most of them will…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 01:31 PM
1

Glasses do not subvert the entire point of the test like extra time does. I know that you understand this, you're just pretending to be stupid for some unknown reason. I imagine it makes you feel morally righteous. You're probably wafting your own farts right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 12:35 PM
1

Clearly this is difficult for you to understand. Which is fine, you're just a bit out of your depths. Once again, this is a basic philosophical concept that should be self-evident. I don't even think it's a matter of education, you just aren't able to comprehend this subject. It is widely discussed in both political and moral philosophy. For humans to build functional societies, they need to give up individual freedoms. I gave you multiple examples, you acknowledged one of them, so what exactly …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 12:04 PM
1

Glasses are not an academic accommodation. Look up the term and educate yourself. I work in HR. What do I care? This is irrelevant. What's the matter with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:07 AM
-1

What the fuck? This is a basic philosophical concept that should be self-evident. What exists outside of society? Nature. In the jungle, are there rules you have to conform to? Nope. If you're an uncivilized animal, and you come across another homo sapien, you can just kill them and take their shit. Morality doesn't exist in nature, there are no rules. You are completely and totally "free". Despite this, we generally live much better lives when we form large groups. Sadly, it's not possible for …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 10:57 AM
1

Is there something wrong with you? Glasses are not an academic accommodation. I'm starting to doubt that you're even a real person. How is it even possible for someone to type a response without thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 10:29 AM
1

Tests are supposed to assess more than factual recall. The constraints are supposed to test your time and stress management skills. Your ability to read and comprehend instructions in a timely manner is implicitly tested as well. When you give people extra time, you're completely throwing all of that out the window. It's not longer a standardized test. It's not testing an individual's actual attributes. People with glasses aren't given extra time to take tests. This conversation is stupid and a …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:59 AM
1

Why would only immigrants from Islamic countries come here? Muslims make up >25% of the global population. They make up an even larger percentage of people who are looking to leave their home countries. And if they did come here I imagine it’s because they don’t like how things are run at home and they want to live differently. You're completely out of your depths here, you have no idea what you're talking about. Have you not heard of Dearborn or Hamtramck? The sky is not falling my dude. Watch …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:52 AM
1

America was founded by immigrants from Western civilizations. Are you not thinking straight? Above our discussion (same thread), a woman said this: Do you want things to devolve into an Islamic state? These are third world countries stricken by poverty and no freedom of belief. You think that we can mass import people from Islamic countries and not devolve into an Islamic state? Their populations are above replacement rate, ours aren't. If you don't support forced ideological conversion of immig…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:16 AM
1

Where birth replacement is low, you can always invite immigrants in as well lol and offer them a decent place to live. Correct, that's exactly how we'd become a third world country.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:55 AM
-5

Did you not read what I said? Individuals sacrificing freedoms (or "rights") is necessary if they want to live in a functioning society. That's really what societies are at their core, obligations between individuals. But if a woman is forced by government laws and policies to create children I don't think we should force women to breed. It should just be encouraged. If you're not meeting your societal obligations, then why shouldn't society view you with disdain? But men are not and never have …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:48 AM
-1

This man needs help because if he doesn’t actually figure life out, he’s not going to live much of one. In what sense? Without a female companion, he won't have much of a life? Okay then. Let's assume this is true. He has a massive shift in perspective, becomes a male feminist, women find it attractive and he marries one. Even if he's good to her, she can still just divorce him for no reason at all. It's literally a coin-flip, there's like a 50% chance that happens. Then what? He loses half of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:33 AM
-6

Feminism isn't exactly what granted women rights. Interesting choice of words with "subjugate", I think this reveals a lot about your mentality. Is a man who works 12 hours a day to house and feed his family "subjugated" by them? Not really, he's just meeting his obligations to his family and the society he lives in. Ultimately, it's in his best interests, so how could that be subjugation? Is it in your best interests to live in a functional society? Obviously it is. So why are you so opposed to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:13 AM
-4

Why would he need help?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:54 AM
4

Out of all the boys who have ever been boy scouts, that's like a fraction of a single percent. I'm fairly confident that you have a higher rate of being sexually abused in public schools. The Dept of Education commissioned a study in 2004 that found ~10% of students will be the victim of sexual misconduct by the time they graduate high school. That one’s not exactly a shining example of good “boys only” spaces. It's a reflection of the world we live in. There are a lot of sick, deranged people. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:49 AM
0

Ah yes, I forgot that women want the right to murder their own children more than anything else in the world. My apologies. Sometimes I think too highly of our own species and forget that we're ultimately just animals that want to engage in filial cannibalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:49 AM
1

You are the one complaining we don’t live in a third world country I don't want to live in a third world country, that's the entire point. The ideology that YOU support will eventually turn the West into the third world. Our societies cannot sustain themselves. If either men or women disappeared we’d all suffer. You only exist because your mother chose to have you. Not exactly. Civilizations would not immediately fall apart if women disappeared. If men disappeared, women would be screwed. Humani…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:40 AM
1

Why would someone need extra time to take a test if they were just as academically gifted as all the other students?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:56 AM
–

What does it matter? Nobody should be given extra time to take tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:54 AM
2

Women constantly voice wanting to eliminate the draft or to be included in the draft. No they aren't, you're just lying. This has never been a prominent focus of any female-led movement, ever. Why do you feel the need to tell such an obvious lie? Also signing up and actually doing something of value for the country are two different things. Do you not understand what a responsibility is? You need me to explain it to you? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:54 AM
1

You brought up wheelchair ramps and extra wide doorways as examples of academic accommodations. They aren't even academic accommodations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:57 PM
1

Yeah I bet 40% of the students at Stanford are riding around campus in wheelchairs. Did you even think this through before you said it? If you want to argue that any significant number of students are using their phones to pass tests, then you can provide some evidence. A significant number of them are being provided with extra time to take exams and turn in assignments. The phone thing happens as well, but is more of an edge case. I'm not inclined to take a random redditor's opinion on the valu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:47 PM
0

Are you serious? Why would you ask me such a silly question? Academic accommodations include things like extended test times and "assistive" technology (e.g. access to one's phone). If an individual was provided with these advantages, they are less capable than students who received the same degree without them. Degrees from Stanford are prestigious and very credible, at-least they used to be. You can't lower academic standards without lowering the value of the degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:16 PM
1

Can you expand on what benefits society when women are socially coerced into dating men they are not politically aligned with? Are you serious? You don't enjoy the fruits of male labor? Okay, then go live in the wilderness with a group of women. Good luck! This is such a silly question. You are overtly reliant on men, you cannot survive without them. You're just so out of touch with reality that you don't realize it. through coercion, laziness, and misogyny Except it's none of those things. Men …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 11:20 AM
-3

Sounds to me like you're in academia. What do you do in your "circles"? Blow smoke up each others' asses?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 10:46 AM
-3

I'm sure that's included, but obviously 40% of people don't have dyslexia. It's a wide range of mental conditions. To be clear, I wasn't stating that 40% of the students have an intellectual disability, just that they receive accommodations. Providing that many students with accommodations drastically lowers the credibility of degrees from Standford.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 10:41 AM
-5

highly educated, very intelligent How do you figure? Are they doctors? Lawyers? Engineers? Educational standards at universities have lowered so drastically that people with intellectual disabilities can get master degrees. That's not even a joke, it happens all of the time. 40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations. So when people make generalizations like "highly educated", I tend to roll my eyes. It no longer means anything. Some degrees are easier to get than a high school…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 09:16 AM
0

It's not for the sake of men. It's for the sake of the society you take for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 09:04 AM
1

No, but reversing some aspects of modern liberalization would be nice. Really, if our goal is create a self-sustaining society, then it's a necessity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 08:55 AM
-3

Why do women expect men to hurt themselves to uplift women? I had to sign over my bodily autonomy just to vote. What have you sacrificed? Nothing? You have absolutely zero responsibilities to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 08:50 AM
2

What do you consider to be "advantageous" to women? Liberal ideals? How? Look at the paradox of declining female happiness. Women have generally become more miserable since the 1970s. They report lower levels of well-being and life satisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 08:48 AM
2

You know that stomach is used as a synonym for abdomen in casual conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:48 PM
-3

Who gives a shit? It's their nature. They have a fertile abyss inside of their stomach from which all life is formed. Women are literally harboring a cosmic void and you're concerned because some of them read smut? What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:21 AM
0

War and genocide aren't so cut and dry. Lots of German women were totally on board with it, some were completely evil. Ever hear of Ilse Koch? The Rwandan genocide had a lot of female participants as well. Read this paper from the ICRC. Mass shootings, serial killings, armed robbery, etc... All primarily male, of course. I wouldn't argue that they aren't. You're wrong about intimate partner violence, though. Women and men report being abused at similar rates. In some studies, more men report vio…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:25 PM
2

I'm not too sure about that, most of the men in the Nerva Antonine Dynasty had balls of steel. Most of them lacked heirs so they had to adopt. Surprisingly, it ended up being great for the Roman empire. Aurelius actually had a biological son, so there was no need to adopt an heir. Sadly, his son was an absolute dipshit. One could argue that Aurelius' balls ended the Pax Romana, his functioning testicles fucked it all up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:10 PM
2

Well, it depends. I’m sure there are some men who would benefit from an arrangement like this. For example, let’s say your balls exploded in an accident and you never had children. You never dated women either, you were too scared to show a woman your deformed genitals. Now you’re a 55 year old Eunuch and the CEO of a Fortune 500 company. You need to find suitable heirs. If the children are relatively young, then you could potentially “adopt” them and raise them as your own. You also get to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:38 PM
-3

This isn’t exactly true. The statistics appear to show that women are more likely to engage in small acts of violence. The damages aren’t as severe because they aren’t as strong as men. Throwing something at their partners in a fit of rage doesn’t have the same consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:12 PM
1

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:05 PM
–

A lot of warehouse wagies might be replaced, but I'm not too sure. Amazon has automated a lot of the work in their warehouses, yet they still require a shit load of warehouse employees. People operating heavy machinery (truck drivers, crane ops) will probably never be replaced. Those jobs require accountability and a capacity for edge-case judgement. They could be assisted by AI, but that's really it. It starts with tech. I doubt it. You could replace "code monkey" jobs, e.g. converting Figma fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:48 AM
–

It might affect the dating landscape, but I think your theories are completely wrong. If it does anything at all, it'd be the indirect result of job losses. The jobs most at risk of AI-replacement are low-skill white collar jobs. Assistants, administrative staff, customer service reps, etc. I believe women are more likely to hold these jobs than men, but it's a mixed bag. Most nurses are women, and I doubt that they will be replaced. Regardless, most people performing physical labor are men. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:47 AM
1

I understand what you're saying, but the guy isn't always the one inviting the woman out to dinner. In situations like this, the woman is often the one who initiated it, even if she didn't directly ask the guy out on a date. For example, let's assume Stacey really likes Brad. She constantly reaches out him, even though he doesn't really reciprocate her advances. Texts like "heyyy how r u?", little comments on his social media posts, etc. Stacey is signaling the fact that she wants to breed with …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:18 AM
1

The possibility of this post being satire has not gone over my head. However, she gave this post the debate flair, so I'm assuming the argument is real and am engaging with it. OP is doing the same thing. If I had to guess, I'd say that she formulated the concept as a way to make fun of the guys who complain about women who make them wait. At the same time, she clearly does believe in the opinions she's expressing, so it's not a complete ruse. She espouses similar beliefs in other threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:04 AM
3

Then stop going on dates with men who don't desire you. You're allowing yourself to be used because you want to date men who are out of your league. Do you not understand this? Handsome, high-value men who can date other women (e.g. "Stacey") aren't going to have a "raw desire" for you. Get over it, you can't have it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:41 PM
5

It is your responsibility. Stop going on dates with men who aren't willing to pay for you. Stop attempting to date men who are out of your league and feel no need to impress you. You're just making silly, unreasonable demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:22 PM
3

Okay? If you want a man to pay for you, then stop trying to date men who are out of your league. It's really that simple. This guy will pay for Stacey because he's attracted to her. Men often tell here how humiliating it is to be treated "worse" than previous partners. You indirectly proved their point when you made this post. Women will bend over backwards to please men who are out of their league and not willing to commit, then demand princess treatment from whatever poor schmuck ends up with …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:48 AM
3

Well, the internet has basically made it so that you can be a 'participating' member of society with the lifestyle of a NEET. A lot of people working white collar jobs lived like this during COVID. I think the problem is really the deterioration of what it means to be a 'participating' member of society. That's the argument you're making, correct? An individual can follow their core civic duties (paying taxes, obeying the law, voting) while completely ignoring the traditional social obligations …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:45 AM
0

Autonomy is an abstract concept, it doesn't actually exist and cannot be "stripped" from you. You're not even an autonomous individual. You live in a society, benefit from it and abide by its rules. A society is just a collection of individuals. It does not work if everyone is doing whatever the hell they want. Civic duties are a necessary aspect of a functioning society. If you disagree with the responsibilities bestowed upon you, then what? Are you autonomous? You can remove yourself from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:22 AM
1

I don't think it's infeasible, especially if environmental factors are influencing people's beliefs. It has happened in history before. The Roman people overthrew their original kings, replaced them with a republic, then welcomed back emperors. Obviously these changes occur slowly and over long periods of time. Some aspects of modern liberalism have only really been implemented for a few decades, yet have already had remarkably negative impacts on society. Social cohesion and communities have be…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:14 AM
4

Okay? Nobody argued that it did. It's just an example of a federal constitutional right being revoked.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:03 AM
1

Political liberalization isn't automatically progress. Instability is self-limiting. If an aspect of liberalization negatively impacts a society's ability to sustain itself and function, is "progress" not in the other direction? No takesies backsies when it comes to the perpetual march of progress The overturning of Roe v Wade comes to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 11:32 PM
–

Idk, he might be wearing his cage
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter