TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alek2407 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by alek2407 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

It still doesn't give people license to criticize other strangers. MRA is all up in arms over a guy getting shit over being a single parent, and you're saying it's okay to say that to a woman because research. People should generally stay out of other people's lives and parenting styles unless there is a major problem.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 10:34 PM
-6

See, this kind of stuff is where feminists build there opinion of MRAs. A child needs a father just as much as it needs a mother. If it has one responsible parent of either gender, one of bother gender, or two of one gender then it'll be fine. Don't you see the hypocrisy in saying that single fathers are okay, but single mothers are not?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:45 PM
1

I guess, but that requires way different credentials. Most k12 teachers couldn't teach college without going back to get more education. It's generally considered to be a separate industry.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:04 PM
3

I think that's still diluting the term. It's inappropriate sexual harassment at most. She should be fired, have some benefits removed, and be banned from teaching. Sending her (or anyone regardless of gender) to jail for that is a waste of the public's money and makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:42 PM
6

Oh but common sense never prevails. Fired and banned from teaching though.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:40 PM
1

Religious practices should get the same treatment as established cultural practices. Both can be argued to be protected by the first amendent, one by the establishment clause and the other by the speech clause.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:35 PM
14

But not allowing Muslims to do female circumcision is okay (even though it is a cultural thing for them too). Obviously it is, but the same rule should be applied to Jews. If you're 18 (hell even 16) and want to get circumcised for god then go do it.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:38 AM
1

Still, I believe that the market for history majors is rather limited. There are many other "respectable" majors such as philosophy or sociology which face the same problem.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:10 PM
7

I think it's one of those fields where it's only for the sake of academia. Lots of other subjects such as History or something. You learn them to study them and propagate them. That would be okay, if so many people weren't pursuing those degrees (there is limited spots in academia) and if their expectations were realistic. I'm sure there are a few jobs out there that gender studies would be helpful though (so feminist organizations).
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:04 PM
6

There are two of each gender though. The person on the far left is a woman.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:59 PM
0

Being gay would help.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:22 AM
2

8% is a lot, and this would only add to it. The standard for something being "significant" (often used in science or law) is 5%
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:19 AM
2

I was eager to stick my dick in things at 14 too, but an adult should probably not have been there to take an advantage of that. Just like as a 14 year old I had lots of other stupid ideas, but structures were there to prevent them. The social taboo exists because relationships between people with vastly different controls over power and personal sovereignty lead to abuse. It is the same reason why teacher-student or prisoner-guard relationships are also not acceptable. Should they be outright i…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 09:36 PM
2

I realize that is the law (in some jurisdictions, many in the US set it at 16 or 17) but it is still absurd. I don't think it should be applied to either men or women. Again, this is an ideal and not a reality. I do not support supporting a absurd law though, just to make both sides equally disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 09:27 PM
7

He could have been 11 in middle school (first year) so he is 14, three years later. I think a 14 year old giving consent is not cut and dry, especially with an adult who has power over him and is far older. I think that the social taboos and moral ambiguity do thus add to the situation, and should be considered. I agree with you that we don't have a full picture. I support that cases like these should be individually considered, and punishments should accommodate the circumstance.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:32 AM
11

If it was in middle school (ages 11-14), then that is fairly young to be able to give consent. At least where I lived, kids get rudimentary sex-ed in the last year (obviously, most know something about sex beforehand). The three years later part could mean it was still in middle school, or that he was up to 17. We really don't know. The fact that she was his step mother though makes it inappropriate either way (even if he was an adult). This is both for abusing her inherit power as a parent, and…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:49 AM
1

Funny thing is that is the etymology of testicles. In the roman judicial system you only had to have two witnesses (testifiers) to prove someone guilty. People would just hang outside of courts to be bribed to testify. The two "testifiers" were the friends of a dick.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:31 AM
3

Restrooms, college dormitories, store changing rooms, public showers (like at the gym or pool), hostels (depending on the living arrangements), medical clinics, prisons, etc. Basically, highly public places where people have to get down to their privates or sleep together involuntarily. The examples you listed contain none of that. Hotels slightly do, but the consumer has total control over their living arrangements and rooms are private. On the other hand, places where roommates are random or l…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:33 AM
1

I said the complete opposite of that "But not if the kid is 16 and with the rest of his family. I understand that a policy has to be set, but they should use discretion." This is me in reply to someone saying this incident was totally justifiable. I argue that although I understand the need for unisex shelters (and having some number define adulthood), they should allow male adolescents with their families as it.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:31 AM
1

Read my original comment. I just said what you said. MRAs like you who just try to male everything into total war bring us a bad name.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:10 AM
1

The shelter has a valid mission. It provides a service needed to a specific subset of women and children who usually have different needs then men. This isn't some matriarchal conspiracy, this is reality. For me, the bigger issue is why wasn't there a men's (or even just coed) shelter in the community that would take a man.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:27 PM
6

But not if the kid is 16 and with the rest of his family. I understand that a policy has to be set, but they should use discretion. There would be a profound difference between say a group of random 16 year olds vs a 16 year old with his mom and little siblings.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:51 AM
17

My macbook likes to tell me that lady is sexist and that I should use something like person, individual, or woman. I kid you not
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter