aleknovkovski Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience That doesn't make sense based on the rejection rate out there. Women are constantly whining and complaining about the options "being crap". If most women found most guys approaching or asking them out to be good enough, the rejection rate wouldn't be what it is. The best players (most handsome, most charismatic, most everything) in the world only get a couple of percent of the women they go for.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 06:30 PM
2	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience If the dinner is completely random and appears randomly, and is most often not what you wanted to eat, and you say "oh well, whatever randomly appears in my house, that's what I'll eat... And if it's not what I wanted I'll just skip dinner because I can't be bothered to cook or order what I actually want..." Then yes, lazy	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 05:49 PM
-1	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience Apologist	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 02:47 PM
5	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience Sure. Just a longer way to say lazy	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 09:41 AM
1	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience It's just laziness	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 09:40 AM
0	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience It's just laziness and hipocrisy	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/08/26 09:38 AM
–	Women Can't Be "Used" For Sex If They Consented. That's Feminist Victim Mentality Rhetoric. I still don't understand how that's a promise for marriage and white picket fence? I'm pretty sure fwbs compliment each other. Are you saying people who are in casual arrangements are never nice and appreciative to each other?	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/07/26 12:22 PM
–	Women Can't Be "Used" For Sex If They Consented. That's Feminist Victim Mentality Rhetoric. Compliments are a promise of being with you forever and a contract that they can't change their mind????	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/07/26 11:04 AM
4	Women Can't Be "Used" For Sex If They Consented. That's Feminist Victim Mentality Rhetoric. This. Consent can be removed at any time, it has to be ongoing. Just like women are allowed to change their mind, so should men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/07/26 11:03 AM
1	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Yah Ive honestly never known, or heard of a woman empathizing with men not approaching. Which was the original point. If they ever respond to it, they tend to ascribe character flaws on the man, not empathy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/07/26 10:05 PM
1	One of the worst pieces of dating advice men get is "forget the apps, just talk to women in person" I didn't say there are cheat codes to becoming good. I said that once you can easily start smooth conversations everywhere THIS itself is a cheat code (to dating options and life) As for becoming good, there's no cheat code. Hundreds of approaches before you stop sucking, maybe up to a 1000 before you become good.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/26 08:01 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill Are you seriously claiming shy people never interact with other humans? Holy smokes 😂 I get why you had to go this absurd. Your whole defense is that women don't reject shy men, they just never encounter them. But shy men do interact. They do make attempts. And when they do, they get humiliated for the delivery while smooth guys with rotten character get a pass. That's why you needed to invent a new species of human that survives without ever interacting with anyone 😂 Because the moment a shy gu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/26 07:53 PM
1	One of the worst pieces of dating advice men get is "forget the apps, just talk to women in person" Cold approach is really good once you get past beginner hell. It's fun and you easily get dates with women way above your league. The part that nobody says is how much work it is to get to the point where you're getting results and not just brutal humiliating rejection. They kind of brush that away. However once you become good/smooth at starting conversations it's like a cheat code.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/26 07:28 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill It's not goal post moving. You have this insane caricature of shy men that they don't ever talk to anyone or ever show interest. Point is women are so obsessed with being lazy that unless you're an fboy, you're treated worse than actual criminals.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/26 05:41 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill Akwardness refers to showing interest akwardly. Women treat akward men trying to interact with them as pure human garbage, i.e. worse than criminals. Shy = doesn't initiate/makes moves Akward = does it akwardly I love how you keep writing these huge essays to justify women's laziness and obsession with fboys	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/07/26 11:54 AM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill Being evil doesn't prevent dating. Lacking flirting skills and smoothness does. And you yourself admitted it's all women to whom shy men are invisible. So it's not just bad women, it's all women. All women treat akwardness as a crime. If you're a smooth asshole you get women kissing up to you. If you're an akward saint you get treated like garbage. Not just by bad women. All women. There's no rule of physics that forces women to humiliate akward men. Nothing physically stops women from getting t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 04:31 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill Being evil doesn't prevent dating. Lacking flirting skills and smoothness does. And you yourself admitted it's all women to whom shy men are invisible. So it's not just bad women, it's all women. All women treat akwardness as a crime. If you're a smooth asshole you get women kissing up to you. If you're an akward saint you get treated like garbage. Not just by bad women. All women. There's no rule of physics that forces women to humiliate akward men. Nothing physically stops women from getting t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 04:30 PM
0	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill You wrote your lie so confidently that I questioned my sanity for a second there. Then I scrolled up to ops initial text, only to find out that you're lying. Again. He literally says: being an evil man doesn't prevent finding a woman like being shy does Do you see that word PREVENT. That's all he's talking about. He never said women "prefer" evil man. You literally invented words that never appeared on your screen. You yourself admitted that shy men are invisible to women. We all agree. Women du…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 01:09 PM
0	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill For someone who whines about being misrepresented you sure set records in lying. For the 38386th time. Nobody is saying women prefer evil men. My claim: All alse equal, women prefer a good man. Here's the issue though. An evil man who's charming is treated better than a saint who's shy of akward. This is a fact. Of course if the good man was charming he'd have even more options than the evil man. However that's not the discussion. The point is women's obsession with laziness. They refuse to do a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 12:39 PM
0	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill You admitted it. Thank you. Only fboys pass step 1	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 12:13 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill You just proved the point. Women's absurd logic: Akward > potential serial killer Confident, charming or charismatic (saint until proven otherwise)	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 12:00 PM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill Yah no. Men have seen this in real life. If you approach women akwardly, they all treat you far worse than if you approach them with charm. It's like a 100-10,000x fold difference based on the woman. Men join hobbies and social clubs and notice that the the fun, witty guy literally gets women kissing his ass regardless of character, whereas all other guys get treated like crap	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 11:43 AM
3	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill The reason we know they dislike them is that when such men do show interest, women act offended and disgusted. How dare you show interest in an akward way, you creep.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 10:20 AM
1	Women dislike weak and shy guys more than violent misogynists and I'll die on that hill You're not disproving his point. He didn't say that being a bad person makes you attractive to women. He says that women treat shy good men worse than horrible (but charming) men. And this is true. Hitler had a girlfriend, saints who are shy don't. Women treat shyness and social akwardness as the worst atrocity on the planet.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/07/26 10:15 AM
6	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Right, and notice what you just did. You gave a careful, sympathetic account of why a woman might not approach, she's afraid of how she'll be read, afraid of looking desperate, afraid of the misread. That fear is real and you extend it to women easily. That's the whole point. That's the same fear men have. The man who doesn't approach is afraid of exactly what you just described, being misread, being seen as creepy, the humiliation of getting it wrong. You understand it perfectly when it's a wom…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 07:00 PM
3	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? It is worse. Two things changed at once: The bar for humiliation dropped. It used to take crossing a line. Now an awkward, harmless approach is enough. Clear invites all but vanished, while the rule hardened into "a real man approaches uninvited." Higher risk, less warning, and you have to approach anyway. So who's left? The man who doesn't fear doing the wrong thing. You didn't make men braver. You filtered for the ones who feel nothing. Ask anyone who dated in the 90s. The difference isn't sub…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 08:02 AM
3	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? "Too long" isn't a counterargument. You didn't name one thing that doesn't make sense, because the length was never the problem, it's that there's nothing to answer. So here it is in three lines: Approaching risks humiliation, unavoidably, even when you're respectful. You said so yourself. So the man who minds humiliation does it less, and the man who doesn't minds it does it the same. Make the humiliation worse and quieter to read, and you filter the pool down to the men who feel nothing, who a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 07:06 AM
3	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? How does filtering for men who ignore social messaging and don't care about doing the right thing keep women safe, exactly? Because that's what "if he's interested he'll just approach" selects for. The man who walks up to a stranger who's signaled nothing, in a climate he knows treats unsolicited approach as threatening, and feels nothing doing it, is a man who isn't reading her. He doesn't need her signals because he was never checking them. The man who hesitates is hesitating because he's weig…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 07:03 AM
7	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Right, approaching risks humiliation and there's no formula to avoid it. I agree completely. That's the entire point. If humiliation is unavoidable even when you're respectful, then the question isn't "how do you avoid it." It's "who keeps approaching anyway once it's guaranteed?" The guy who feels the humiliation approaches less. The guy who doesn't feel it approaches exactly as much as before.So the more unavoidable the humiliation, the more you tilt the pool toward men who don't care about be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 06:38 AM
7	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? I'm not asking women to approach. I'm saying you can't have all three of these at once: Men who don't approach are losers. Men who approach wrong get humiliated. We barely signal or send clear invites anymore. Put those together and the only guys left approaching are the ones who feel zero fear, the ones who never cared about being creepy in the first place. And don't read "zero fear" as a good thing. Up to a point, sure, less fear is better, more comfortable, smoother, easier to talk to. But th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 06:29 AM
9	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Women seem completely devoid of an ability to empathize. Even though they themselves don't show interest for fear of rejection, if a man doesn't, he is suddenly a flawed human that they need to pathologize. Even though it's literally the exact same thing. Men are humans too	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 05:56 AM
4	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? The analogy isn't "intimacy is the economy." Nobody said that. It's narrower: "reward" means a behavior got reinforced, whether or not anyone chose it consciously. That's true in a marriage, a friendship, a market, a dog training session. It's not an economics concept, it's a reinforcement concept. You've objected that intimacy isn't a market, which is true and isn't the point. The word survives the realm change because reinforcement does.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/06/26 05:16 AM
4	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Wanting a man who can act despite discomfort is fair. The problem is the assumption under it: that "he approached" is a clean readout of confidence and interest. For twenty years the message men got was that approaching is creepy, intrusive, unwelcome. That message doesn't land evenly. It hits hardest the men most tuned to social cues and most afraid of making a woman uncomfortable. It barely touches the men who never cared. So it didn't lower approaching across the board. It changed who approac…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 11:50 PM
3	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Most consumers reward evil profit-driven corporations that use manipulation to get the consumer to buy things they do not need. As everyone keeps telling you. Reward does not mean logically and conciously thought out.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 11:25 PM
9	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? But they are. Women made approaching them such a morally toxic minefield that only abusers approach. Women did that. Women did it. Women created that quagmire. Only women can solve it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 11:19 PM
4	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? You're still measuring it from the buyer's side. "Reward" isn't about whether you wanted the thing. It's about what your money teaches the manufacturer to do next. You paid the subscription, so the subscription model worked, so they'll do it again, and so will every other manufacturer watching. That's the reward. It doesn't require you to feel ripped off. It just requires your behavior to make the strategy pay. Same with partner choice. Whether women feel like they're "rewarding" anything is irr…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 10:12 PM
3	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Wtf kinda non-sequitor you got there? No, it doesn't have be meritocratic in order to have a causal chain, wtf are you even on. NO: A causal chain in a social system doesn't need to be based on merit to exist. Dumbed down example: if a society sends criminals to high office, and the more corrupt you are the more money you make, that's a society that "rewards corruption." Nobody thinks the corrupt deserved it by merit. That's the point. Only thing I can think of is that you read "reward" and assu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 07:42 PM
9	Do women realize that the way they choose partners often rewards the same type of men? Doesn't matter. We're talking about things from a psychological/sociological perspective. If certain behaviors in a society get rewarded, the downstream consequences are such and such.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 02:11 PM
1	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. Okay, let's play this game, shall we. Tell someone you want to introduce them to a guy with a "bad personality" and see what pops into their head first. Selfish, negative, stingy, cruel, dishonest. Nobody pictures shy or awkward. You know this full well... you just chose to gaslight.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/06/26 07:35 AM
3	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. The claim was never "no guys approach." The ones who didn't listen to women still do. It's the men who took women's messaging at face value who stopped. Way to go, geniuses. You got the good guys who actually listen to women to quit, and handed a total monopoly to the guys who said "ahh f that, broads b crazy" and kept going. You then tried to imply that the men who actually listened to the actual words that women said are somehow defective for it, and it's somehow a character flaw to listen to …	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 10:26 PM
9	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. The percentage of men who stopped approaching women, hitting on women etc, is way higher than the percentage of men that are autistic. Claiming only autistic men got the wrong message is an excuse women are coming up with now for being horrible communicators.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 09:58 PM
7	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. You're just making excuses for being horrible communicators. Women ruined an entire generation of boys with their insanely imprecise communication. And now they blame the victims for not (mind)reading the imprecise communication	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 09:51 PM
7	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. Again, you know full well that when someone reads bad personality that reads in the same category is immorally bad traits.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 08:49 PM
4	Inability to attract a woman isn’t always bad personality. That's not a bad personality. Bad personality is things like stingy, deceitful, etc. Saying that a shy man is bad is atrocious	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 08:35 PM
–	Men do reject women at similar rate, it’s just different. Yeah exactly. This is the most entitled definition of rejection ever. Men's definition of rejection: "I said hello to a girl and she rolled her eyes and scowled as-if" Women's definition of rejection: "I decided I'm ready to allow a guy to make a move and he didn't immediately oblige upon my wishes that I didn't even communicate with actual words, therefore I have been rejected"	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 07:04 PM
–	Most men here don't just have dating problem, they're severely under-socialized in general. I was gonna say are you kidding, but then I remembered how blind you women are to your dating privileges. Men are required to develop an entire separate set of sociosexual skills that women don't. Knowing how to approach, how to read interest. How to move fast enough to not be seen as a bore lacking chemistry, but not so fast that you're creepy. Knowing how to make and bridge each of the 3738 steps between hello and first kiss, and again, know when to do each one in a way where you're always dan…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/06/26 06:55 PM
2	We need to stop the contradictions/gaslighting towards men Women say the same things in real life if you bring them up in real life. The only reason it happens more online is because men are more comfortable airing grievances online. But when they state those grievances in real life the response from women is the exact same kind of shaming and gaslighting.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/04/26 06:28 AM
1	Apparently women turn “demisexual” around average men You're missing the point completely. If women said that, there wouldn't be an issue. The main issue is women tell different stories based on context. If young men were told "women love quick casual sex if the guy is hot enough, but for less hot guys the turning it takes longer". Men wouldn't have an issue. What women say is: "I don't do quick sex". Which is a lie. Like why is it so difficult to understand the concept of lying vs telling the truth.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/12/25 11:34 AM
1	A lot of men who complain about attractive men being assholes and still getting laid are themselves bad men who wish they didn’t have to act like a good person in order to get laid. Lol the only difference between guys who get laid and guys who don't is how often they ask women out. All this bs about women being saints who detect inner character is utter nonsense. Ironically enough, one reason assholes get laid more is because they don't care and just keep going and are unphased by rejection, whilst incels take it personally. Women created this system where literal psychopaths do best in the game, because being successful in dating women requires being impertinent to social…	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/08/25 09:31 PM
1	Being more blue-pilled can set you apart from the vast majority of men who are now red-pilled You're misusing the term "blue pill" here. None of the things you're describing - being courteous, genuine, having good social skills, showing interest while maintaining self-respect - are "blue pill" behaviors. They're just normal, healthy dating behaviors. Actual blue pill mindset would be believing that being nice alone brings romantic success, thinking looks/fitness/status don't matter at all, pedestalizing women, having no boundaries, or believing in Disney-style soulmate fantasies. What yo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/25 06:37 PM
1	Love and sex is not a right This is a purposeful distortion of what people complain about. Not a single person has ever said they're entitled to love or sex from society. What people do say (and gets maliciously twisted), is that there are guys who say they're entitled to TRUTH and informed consent. Society gaslights an entire swath of the male population about how getting sex and love works in order to extract more work and resources out of them. When they see that the guys who get laid the most don't follow the rules the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/07/25 07:07 PM
1	If women actually had such good personalities - men would just hire them to ghost write their dating profiles and chats. Dont forget that women use euphemisms. When they say personality, they mean game and sociosexual skills. Not actual personality. You can be a drug dealer that tortures kittens for fun and have a harem if you have game. You can be a saint, but if you can't approach women with swag you'll be having dry spells longer than the Sahara	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/06/25 10:47 AM
1	It’s not worth it for men to have female friends, too many downsides, not enough benefit. I disagree. Having more female friends was one of the best things in my life.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/05/25 02:08 PM
1	There are 2 harsh truths that men and women have accept sooner or later. Because they tried it and saw that it was a waste of time. Personally I wasted a bunch of years going to hobbies (that I was passionate about), only to watch the fboys dominate and bang everybody in the hobby. Hobbies are great if you're already the kind of guy who gets laid. You don't START getting laid because you join a hobby. This is the lie that guys have an issue with. Getting laid is a separate skill that you learn separately. You could practice on people you meet at the bus stop, it does…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/01/25 07:02 PM
1	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? Youre just pretending now with the whole "we can't define it" thing... As the other poster said: how come women never dress in such a manner in all-women contexts and it only happens in meat markets. There's a specific type of dressing that only is seen in situations with sexual competition and men present.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/11/24 05:15 AM
1	CMV: "Watch what women do, not what they say" is misogynistic This isn't gendered. Humans tend to say one thing and do another. In business you learn to study what the customers respond to, not what they say they would respond to. It's called stated preferences and it's accepted that humans tend to believe one thing and even get mad that you don't believe them, but they are actually lying to themselves. Watch what people do, not what they say...	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 01:20 PM
2	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? I don't understand the point of this reply. I already agree with you. Of course women don't dress up provocatively in women only groups. I'm agreeing with you. Of course it only happens in places where men are present. The nuance is that it's not done to "get attention from the men" in that room as that implies men in general. It's done to get the attention of the women in that room and the high status men. So it's aimed at all 100 women there and only 10 men. Make sense?	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 12:22 PM
2	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? Yes, I'm not disagreeing with you. Dressing up to show off the goods always involves men, and is only done in places where women are competing for male attention. You're correct on that part. The nuance I'm adding is that the main motivation is communicating to other women "I'm hotter than you and can get more male attention if I wanted to". They still don't want attention from 90% of men. And the primary motivator is rubbing it in the face of other women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 12:14 PM
8	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? As the other person mentioned, for hookups it does confer an advantage. It only doesn't matter for serious relationships. For hookups absolutely helps.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 12:00 PM
12	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? You're both right. It's only mostly true. It is mostly to compete for other women, whilst simultaneously hoping it goes unnoticed by 90% of men who would be deemed creepy if they noticed the dress up. However, they are secretly hoping one of the 10% notices it too. So it's not just for women. But it is mostly to compete with other women. Let's say mostly motivated by flaunting it in other women's faces, and partially hoping it gets noticed by the hot guys too. But somehow only the hot guys, beca…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 11:59 AM
1	Why do women dress provocatively if they don't like most men? I think that's (mostly) true. However part of it is probably also hoping the attract attention from the right guy. We know this since the pecking/status order still exists even if you're taken/not horny. Yet women dress up more when single and ovulating.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/24 11:57 AM
2	Guys here refuse to believe any behavior can be creepy and/or hinder one’s social life. Creepy itself is a subjective felt state, it's in the definition. Whether an action is seen as creepy is totally reliant on the receiver. The sender doesn't know in advance, they can only make a guess. Are there actions, words and behavior that are STATISTICALLY more likely to be seen as creepy than others? Yes. SHOULD guys avoid words, behaviors and actions that are more likely to be seen as creepy than not? Yes. However, about 99% of the things labelled creepy, it's either a personal ick for t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/11/24 11:45 AM
5	Guys here refuse to believe any behavior can be creepy and/or hinder one’s social life. So you admit that whether something is seen as crass or flirty depends on how hot the person saying it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/11/24 11:34 AM
8	Guys here refuse to believe any behavior can be creepy and/or hinder one’s social life. They actually did experiments with having a fake profile of a hot guy DM ing girls with the most crass things you can imagine, and the girls giggled and flirted back.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/11/24 10:10 PM
-1	Age gap relationships are often more equal than close age relations Another thing everyone forgets: women have the benefit of dating players. The reason women accrue experience much faster and earlier in life is that they can get it handed to them by players. I saw someone say where did girls get the experience if not with guys so aren't both gaining it? Well one player hits on a 100 girls, which means 99 boys get no experience, whereas a 100 girls do. This is a big source of the experience gap. Due to being asked out and approached so much more, they accrue exp…	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/11/24 07:20 PM
1	Abruptly learning about female standards can lead to mental disarray The research is pretty clear. Women have an in-group bias, men don't. In other words, men don't care about other men. Whereas women with power use that power to help other women, men don't.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/11/24 02:13 PM
1	Abruptly learning about female standards can lead to mental disarray There are 3 genders in this discussion. Women, average men and high status men. The average man gains nothing from high status men existing. Just like they don't gain anything when a player has hundreds of girlfriends. That doesn't benefit the average guy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/11/24 04:07 AM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? Two wrongs don't make a right. The examples you mentioned are just as wrong.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 04:35 PM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? I don't know if you're being ingenuine or generally can't tell the difference between statements and commandments. A woman saying "tall men cheat" vs a woman saying "never ever ask a girl out at the gym" are in no way comparable. The first is a generalization, the latter is pretending to be a spokesperson giving commandments in the name of all women everywhere.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 03:55 PM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? I can't tell if you're being disingenuous on purpose or lacking reading comprehension. Nobody says "random women should come up to me and give me advice". It's obviously intended at the ones who are ALREADY giving advice. He's just saying if you're going to give me commandments, at least complete the sentence. The issue is that boys are growing up in a society where they're bombarded with women saying "NEVER EVER DO X, THAT MAKES YOU A BAD PERSON", but never giving alternatives. The moment you s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 09:50 AM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? That's the issue a ton of commenters here keep suppressing. Plenty of women pretend to speak for all women. And when you call them out on it they say "well women aren't a monolight, doh". But that's the point, you're the one pretending that women are a monolith and pretending to speak for all women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 09:44 AM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? The issue isn't women complaining about things they don't like. The issue is when they pretend they speak for all women or pretend that women are a monolith. Guys are bombarded with contradictory information that literally can create paralysis. Because different women say "you must never do x with women or you're a bad person", and then other women say "you must do x or you're not a real man". What's wrong with being honest and saying "I prefer x" instead of pretending to speak for all women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 08:46 AM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? You're completely missing the point. Guys are frustrated that many women SPEAK as-if women are a monolith. It's not guys who want women to be a monolith. Just stop pretending that your personal preferences are true for all women or that you represent all women. Do you really not get this or just pretending not to get it? The issue isn't that Jane and Marge have opposite preferences. The issue is that they both claim their preference is what all women want and pretend to speak for all women.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 08:41 AM
–	How to deal with women making negative judgements on dating behavior but simultaneously offering no alternatives? The point is (the frustrating part) is that many women SPEAK as if they were a spokesperson for a monolith. Jane wants guys to just approach her without waiting for obvious invitations and LAMBAST guys and say "we women don't like wussies who wait around waiting for the woman to do that" Marge only wants to be approached when she eye-fu*cks a guy with a huge gein and says "GUYS stop approaching women unless they give you a huge grin and stare you down, we women will let you know if we want you t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 08:37 AM
–	Men’s sexuality is constantly both demonized and exalted, creating a super toxic situation You're not hearing it. Men are getting the message that approaching is wrong in and of itself. The details are never spelled out. Only when someone pushes back like the OP do you see things like "oh you can approach, just don't be pushy and take it slow". Furthermore, this comment section always has a bunch of women saying don't approach AT ALL. You pretending that messaging doesn't exist is disingenuous.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 07:11 AM
–	Men’s sexuality is constantly both demonized and exalted, creating a super toxic situation But guys are called creepy for asking. That's the point the OP was making. Guys are put into this double bind where they are defective incels if they don't go and try to get laid, but if they try they risk being labelled creepy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/11/24 06:57 AM