TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alexanderhuntsman Archive

View 2 posts and 37 comments by alexanderhuntsman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

La vie est drole, n'est-ce pas?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:33 PM
1

Thank you for asking, Regrettably, there has been almost no evidence provided for their claims. the return of the 1 in 4 statistic as the 1 in 5 statistic is based on a self selected survey of college age students, with a shockingly small sample size. further, the study used conflates a wide array of behaviors and events with sexual assault or rape, further confusing the numbers. for more information on the inaccuracy of the studies that are used for this, i suggest googling things like "debunki…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:04 PM
16

when feminists decided they wanted in on the party they'd looked down on for so long
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:28 PM
–

thats a fair point, and i certainly didn't mean to dismiss the point that rape victims aren't just women, because bad shit happens to both genders. The point of my comment was meant to be less delegitimizing womens issues, and more pointing out that we shouldn't be eroding civil liberties and due process based on these statistics. we shouldn't be removing any of these protections for women or saying they dont face issues, but we should be giving equal attention to issues men face, which arent re…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:25 PM
–

its true, there have been an embarrassment of all too public poorly executed rape trials. Just saying, i'd be quite careful using the 1 in 4 statistic. it's a blatant abuse of poor statistical research, with a combination of poor methods, confirmation bias among respondents, and conflation of 5 or 6 categories that are quite far from rape as contributing to "1 in 4." Even if it's accepted as true, it's implications are inconsistent and worthy of ridicule. consider: i attend the university of col…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:40 PM
2

thats a good LA times article.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:37 PM
–

They dont have a system for it, because it's not a civil matter and shouldn't be in their hands at all. its very definitively a criminal charge, and really the only thing the school should do is to direct the information to the police and the actual justice system. not it's internal tribunals. Stick around and read some more posts, at the moment, guys are in a very precarious position in the education sphere, with due process being dramatically eroded and what should be criminal cases being adju…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:25 PM
1

agreed, despite the obvious disagreement anyone here will express to the original poster in the image, responding with undirected vitriol rather than actually arguing a point is entirely useless
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:19 PM
1

i'd sorta be fine with there being both exclusive men's and woman's spaces. the old school gentleman's clubs sounded like a good place to unwind.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:27 PM
1

on an entirely unrelated note, the number of a's tacked onto the end of his username always amuses me
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:10 PM
2

good to know, thats the feeling i was getting from all this, but i was having a hard time telling.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:40 AM
1

if i recall correctly they mention false accusations, and problems with homelessness, but its really mostly masculinity discussion, which is a shame, i had high hopes when i heard they were doing this, and i've just caught the tail end of a couple of them.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:06 AM
1

i cant specifically give good examples of them shaming, its just sort of their tone in most of the discussions, they're not specifically saying anything thats especially objectionable, but most of the discussions are framed with this very "modern men have lost their direction" "ways to redefine modern masculinity" type of thing going, which just feels condescending coming from a news source i usually really like for how concrete and honest they really are.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:04 AM
0

no, it's not solid references, which is why im having a hard time judging their message, its mentioned once in a while.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:00 AM
2

the egalitarian contempt and cynicism is a fascinating irony. :D
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:04 AM
3

i agree, which is surprising, because i generally dont like replies to new people that feel combative, i feel they generally drive people away. But yea, nice post Penn, good points.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:36 PM
1

... you would think that would apply here. then again, the people prosecuting and judging this case dont seem to have the best grip on reality
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:11 PM
2

read the original, Thanks :D I like his writing style there.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:34 PM
1

yay free speech :D
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:09 PM
1

What's unfortunate is that a lot of people here found themselves here after being royally fucked by the the current legal landscape. As a result a lot of people are very understandably pissed off. They've heard the arguments you're making many times, and its hard to restate your opinion over and over without getting short tempered. (the legal landscape here being issues like false rape claims, losing custody over their kids, or being on the receiving end of domestic violence and finding that soc…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:15 PM
–

While i can appreciate where you are trying to start this dialogue from, as it seems you are an equity feminist (a position i can still respect). I think you will find, as you no doubt already are experiencing, that a large number of the people here are quite disillusioned with both gender and equity versions of feminism. It seems to me that you haven't yet done the level of personal research that many of the people in this board are expecting to be done, and you've been met with significant bac…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:35 PM
1

statues are my trigger /s
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:17 AM
2

if i had gold to give, i would do so now. because that was perfect.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:13 PM
3

Welcome to the subreddit! (and i suppose, welcome to the proverbial club) i went through much the same thing you've experienced here, and i remember that it was really shocking to see a lot of this stuff. if i may make some viewing/reading suggestions, the youtube videos of GirlWritesWhat are a fantastic starter on many of the topics you're likely to see here, and she has very good coverage of her sources and statistics. (she's also a less confrontational intro to this community than some others…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:13 PM
25

he'll get through the all the videos and such soon enough, dont be all confrontational to people who've just found their way here (if i misinterpreted your tone, my bad)
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:07 PM
1

unrelated: any time i hear the word snooker, i can only think of the mitchell and webb snooker commentators sketches.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:01 AM
1

im basically convinced that this is actually the case. there's no other reason not to have pockets, they're just so handy
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:38 AM
1

whats that last term? this is the first time i've seen it. have people invented yet another pointless category for accusing people of privilege?
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:52 PM
2

ooh, that sounds like a good idea
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:29 AM
1

oh my god they dont even listen to him, they just rattle off their department's PR line without providing any evidence at all. thats disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:44 AM
1

its kind of funny, i've only ever heard feminists actually use "boys will be boys" its almost like they select the parts of reality they want to use for their arguments.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:20 PM
–

i dunno, this might just be me coming back from watching a few of GWW's videos and feeling a little bitter, but i wouldn't be surprised right now if this was real.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:03 AM
3

this just makes me sad :c
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:02 PM
3

thank you for summarizing that more succinctly than I. upboats :D
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:54 AM
5

as far as i can tell, the quote (is it from his book?) is making an observation that if we are going to have the attitude towards consent that we do, then it is 'fraudulent' (using the term loosely) to simultaneously tell someone no and act as though you do expect them to continue, i.e. if someone plays hard to get. And further it comments that before we created the current absolute view of consent, things of that nature, like playing hard to get, were considered 'exciting', and were appropriate…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:49 AM
–

ah, thank you. i didn't realize this. shame, though there are occasionally some good articles on there. like the series on masculine body image and society's attitudes towards the male form. that (among other things) was actually were quite good for me.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 07:19 PM
–

though, guys, over at what about teh menz, at least they mean well and are trying to help, right? what's the general dislike towards them for? we should be focusing on the people who are actually against us. (though i haven't been around here that long, so maybe i missed something, sorry if i did.)
/r/MensRights03/08/11 07:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter