TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alexanderlch Archive

View 5 posts and 228 comments by alexanderlch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

There are marked differences between the two sentiments If you read the other post you referenced in the sub, you can see that the OP never actually clarified what he meant when he said he didn’t want to treat women as equal. This doesn’t necessarily mean looking down on them and is supported by the fact that society as it stands is arguably comparatively and visibly gynocentric. The you say not all women only some women. That’s questionable. In one group we have those women who are CLEARLY agai…
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:49 PM
1

Well you can say it doesn't all you want. Science says different
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:52 PM
1

so not disclosing personal information online is lame?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:52 PM
1

You literally can;t tell me i'm wrong because I'm giving my opinion on something that cant be measured and that we'll never know. I also never said that *you* didn't feel a connection during sex, I said that you don't know what shes feeling. and unless you've somehow developed the ability to read minds, you dont
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:51 PM
1

Yes, you can. Through therapy. This is the entire point of therapists and psychiatrists. You talk a lot about how people can change yet you take this stance?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:50 PM
1

No, I said that i don't give advice based on exceptions. I'm actually allowing for the possibility that you're right. But you being right doesn't mean that other people are as lucky as you. Which is what I've been saying for the last 1 hour. You keep dragging this thing back to your relationship with your gf and using that to hold up the weight of this moral discussion. That's not the way it works. The exception doesn't make the rule
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:49 PM
1

Well i dont think it matters so there's not need for me to disclose it
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:47 PM
1

Then why are you asking me about the point of dopamine in this conversation? If you understand this then you shouldn't be asking me about why stripping evokes similar chemical reactions in the brain as doing porn
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:46 PM
1

Yes... that's why I said I *venture* a guess that it is.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:45 PM
1

Yeah, that's your opinion.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:44 PM
1

Then stop wasting my time by asking
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:44 PM
1

No it isn't. We need porn economically but not from a moral standpoint. This is the whole concept of 'necessary evil'.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:43 PM
1

I told you there are people who were abused as children Yes, in your own words, some of them are like that. And what about the rest? The abuse doesn't justify continued attraction to children fi they don't want to get help for it btw. And it doesn't justify possible sexual harassment of minors
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:42 PM
1

Yeah hate to break it to you but the only one who has called the other side dumb is you. No I understand what you're saying. I'm arguing with you because it's full of logical fallacies
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:41 PM
1

Yes, and you've done it egregiously
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:40 PM
1

Why does it matter
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:40 PM
1

Ok, so you don't understand neurology I get it now. I cant be arsed to explain this to you. I can recommend you some searches so that you can understand what I mean. go read up on emotional attachment theory and human bonding. Hysterical bonding as well and how serotin and dopamine in the brain affect emotional attachment
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:39 PM
1

Because you just accused me of not making a factual statement when I said that most relationships with sex workers don't end well. I know this because again, you can search up stats of how many relationships with sex workers end in infidelity or break down because one side cant handle the emotional stress, or turn abusive etc. This isn't a random claim
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:37 PM
1

I wouldn't know, but based on her previous sexual history I would venture that she values it
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:35 PM
1

Well yes, I don't think that people currently pursuing a lifestyle in sex work should become romantically involved with anyone. Now if they stop and want to change how they behave then it could be a possibility
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:34 PM
1

I've already answered this
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:33 PM
1

You were the one asking me why it's a necessary evil. I gave you my answer and now you say you don't care?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:33 PM
1

No, and I haven't
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:32 PM
1

YES. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT PAEDOPHILIA IS
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:32 PM
1

Because of degree of severity, the fact that one is an actual crime etc. I mean you can't actually need me to explain this to you right?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:32 PM
1

I'm not going through this again. Just check my comment on why devaluing sex is bad
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:31 PM
1

I also said it's not a question of having a fucked up childhood per se. Everyone has difficulties growing up. It's about proportionalty
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:30 PM
1

You're not listening. I'm saying stripping is like sex with regards to how dopamine and chemical brain reactions work. And that I'm saying this has a direct bearing on how 'special' someone perceives sex to be in the long run. I also said that watching porn regularly and becoming addicted has the same effect
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:29 PM
1

So the claim that most relationships with strippers or people who work in the sex industry end badly or result in infidelity is baseless is it? I'm going to ask you once: are you sure you want to pursue this line of reasoning
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:28 PM
1

Yes, but i dont see how this is relevant at all to this discussion
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:26 PM
1

I don't think you're listening. I said that you can do whatever you want, I just wouldn't recommend it. Again, you're conflating my opinion with an intention to stop people from acting autonomously
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:26 PM
1

Go search it online then and come to your own conclusions. I'm not going to spoonfed you study after study
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:25 PM
1

I have read up some articles on the value of porn and sex work in a successful economy, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:23 PM
1

Yeah, having a foot fetish isn't the same thing as being sexually attracted to children
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:23 PM
1

Most people who do fucked up things had a fucked up childhood. In your own words, a vast generalization. ​ People do have the ability to change. And I mentioned making an exception about strippers if they show a tangible desire to show that they want to change
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:22 PM
1

What? I never said that watching porn was like sex. I said *pornstars* are like strippers
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:20 PM
1

This has nothing to do with empathy. Even if what you're saying somehow happens to be true, you are by *far* the exception for people who date strippers. and I don't give advice based on exceptions
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:19 PM
1

True. But I never said it definitely was the case that the sex *you" had wasn't special. *You* made that assertion when you said that it *was* special.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:19 PM
1

Yes, that's my opinion. However if two random people decide to do porn and date I'm not going to restrain them and tell them they can't. But if they ask for my opinion I'm going to say it's a bad idea
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:17 PM
1

I mean there are studies on this online. For one thing, it's an economic necessity
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:16 PM
1

Of course they are. You think every paedophile on earth has somekind of childhood trauma that when judged proportionally to their paedophilia would justify it?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:15 PM
1

Absolutely not. You really wanna take this further? How about every genocidal dictator, should they be assessed case by case as well? How about sex traffickes? them too?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:14 PM
1

Yes, I think porn desensitizes one to sex. However, watching porn isn't the same as physically having sex with someone, because in most cases it lacks an emotional connection
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:13 PM
1

So you would know whether she thinks sex is special or not? How would you know that. The point I'm making about dopamine is that you seem to think that the physical act of dictionary definition sex is the only way to become desensitized to it. Stripping can have the same effect because of the way in which dopamine is released
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:12 PM
1

I think porn is a necessary evil in society, but I don't agree with it. That's not the point of those discussion.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:10 PM
1

And for those who are sexually attracted to children voluntarily? How about we take it a step further - how about rapists, murderers? Do we assess them on a case by case basis too?
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:09 PM
1

And you can't detach the psychological aspect of sex from the job of stripping can you? Bruh you don't have to actually have full on naked penetration sex to become desensitized to it. That's not how dopamine works.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 02:01 PM
1

I'm saying that people should avoid them. And it depends if they're willing to change their lifestyle or not.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:59 PM
1

Being a cop and being a stripper are two very different things, not the least being which a cop is charged with doing a moral good to uphold justice. I know the type of work that strippers do and that they chose to do it. That;s enough for me. This argument makes no sense. You might as well say you don't know every paedophile so you're making huge generalizations about paedos
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:58 PM
1

No, they dont. I just explained that's an identity argument. You should be assessing the argument on its merits. The moment you have to rely on your identity to justify your point it means you've lost the argument
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:57 PM
1

I'm not saying look down on them as people. I'm saying I would never consider them romantic partners and that I don't like their morals
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:56 PM
1

Dude, when I say sex it's meant to encompass doing anything of a sexual nature. I didn't think I had to explain that
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:55 PM
1

And I alreayd answered you. Yes
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:54 PM
1

My morals. I think anyone who's a stripper will clash with me on a moral level
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:54 PM
1

I just explained why to you. I'm listening and I'm disagreeing because you're using an identity argument. I don't have to have personal experiences with strippers in a romantic way to be able to frame my argument. Just like I don't have to be a woman to have an opinion on abortion
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:53 PM
1

It's not the money that's makes it not special
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:52 PM
1

If you're asking my opinion, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:51 PM
1

Yes. Although it's not really on the same level of issue because far, far ,far fewer men do OF than women
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:51 PM
1

I meant stay away from them romantically, as this was the whole point of the discussion. You want to be friends with them then go ahead, I still wouldn't because I don't like to surround myself with people I disagree with on a fundamental level but if you want to then fine
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:50 PM
1

No I haven't. But in the same way I don't have to own Microsoft or Tesla to know that you have to have good business sense, I can also tell you that you cant say with 100% either that the sex you had was special. However, I *can* say based on psychological principles that the more you do something that should be rare and special the more you lessen it's uniqueness
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:48 PM
1

It's not. I never said I'm going to force you not to. I just gave my opinion on it
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:44 PM
1

You can do what you want. But this post was about an opinion and its my opinion that men should stay away from these women
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:44 PM
1

No, I'm saying you can do whatever you want. But at the same time I'm allowed to give my opinion that I want to stay away from these kinds of women in my love life, and that people shouldn't be equating the romantic implications of it with a normal job, because it's not
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:43 PM
1

That's your perception of it based on what you can see. I find it extremely difficult if not impossible to believe that a person who basically has sex for a living/ behaves promiscuously and monetizes sex for a living still views it to the same degree of 'special' as other women
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:40 PM
1

No. This discussion is framed based on the premise that men should be careful and avoid OF girls. I'm saying one of the barriers that takes away from stripping as a 'normal job' is that the extra mental burden etc. is entirely voluntary, and that the job being difficult shouldn't be an excuse for strippers to say they are as appealing or deserving of getting married as a woman who doesn't do sex work for a lviing
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:38 PM
1

I'm saying that I wouldn't want my future kid to be a stripper. And that it's a red flag for me if a potential partner takes up a job like that
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:35 PM
1

Yes.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:34 PM
1

You can quit most jobs that's true. That's not the point I'm making though. The additional stress and not to mention added danger of stripping beyond that of a traditional job is entirely voluntary.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:33 PM
1

The you shouldnt put yourself in that situation in the first place and I'm glad you're not. But the same goes for people who are currently strippers.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:32 PM
1

that's not the meaning of desensitization im using in this context
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:28 PM
1

So then how do you know she wasn't addicted to it? I'm not trying to box you in but on one hand you say that she's not a sex addict and then on the other you say she always wanted to have sex. When I say desensitized, I don't mean desensitized to the act, I mean desensitized to the implications of commitment and love that come with it
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:27 PM
1

That's the impression you give when you call a job difficult and mentally taxing. For one, I don't think it's that hard to get on stage and take your clothes off or use your body to get money. Secondly, and this is more important, stripping isn't hard because you can literally quit any time, or if there's a contract of employment, it should have been even more reason for someone not to take up the job in the first place.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:25 PM
2

What does it say when you do something which is inherently intimate by nature with people you don’t care about that way, and consistently desensitize yourself to something as sacred as sex by making it a job. I mean the fact that you’re trying to prop up stripping as hard and emotionally taxing as though it’s an honorable job worth the same moral value/value to society as doing something like medicine or construction says it all
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:17 PM
11

What a surprise the feminist resorts to ad hominems when she doesn’t have a response. Instead of calling everyone here neckbeards why don’t you actually point out what’s wrong with the post instead of putting on a false pretense of civility
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:14 PM
1

How would you know if the hypothetical ex stripper person wasn’t still a sex addict? You may have a charmed dating life but anyone who has a high body, especially in sex based professions like stripping automatically gets desensitized to sex whether they are aware of it or not, and that never ends well
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:08 PM
1

There is literally a post in here within the last 3 days about a tweet that says a woman doesn’t have an OF because she wants a husband. What are you on about made up scenarios bullshit
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:06 PM
3

Ehhh not too sure about the numbers bro. Considering how many feminists/pro trans etc people there are out there and how support for their agenda is rapidly increasing I’d say the numbers are more than just a few people now
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:03 PM
3

No, they can get married because there are always going to be men who don’t respect themselves enough to stay away from these women. What I’m saying is that anyone who goes around with a 1000 body count should be a walking talking red flag for potential partners
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 01:01 PM
3

I don’t. If any man has that little self respect that they’d marry a slut who openly insults them by teasing promiscuity while in a relationship with them then they deserve whatever happens to them
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 12:59 PM
3

How the hell are OF girls victims. Nobody forced them to do it
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 12:56 PM
1

To destroy the nuclear family so that generations can be more easily indoctrinated by the State. I’d recommend reading Marxism it’s the whole basis of their bs ideology
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 04:41 PM
2

Nah not really it’s the same shit repackaged into a different box. Same branch of ad hominems just that it went from “stupid” to “ugly”
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 04:32 PM
5

“Are you stupid, dumb, or stupid”
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 04:30 PM
4

And punching someone isn’t battery
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 07:07 AM
5

Don’t think any black men will have any trouble not doing that with her
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 07:06 AM
1

So what’s your problem with it then, don’t just make an accusatory statement without giving your reasons
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/22 07:05 AM
1

I gave you the reciprocal violence stat and the crimes stat
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 07:02 PM
2

A New York Times examination after the death of George Floyd found that while black people make up 19 percent of the Minneapolis population and 9 percent of its police, they were on the receiving end of 58 percent of the city’s police use-of-force incidents. A massive study published in May 2020 of 95 million traffic stops by 56 police agencies between 2011 and 2018 found that while black people were much more likely to be pulled over than whites, the disparity lessens at night, when police are …
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 07:02 PM
1

Prove. That. How many exactly, unless your trying to say that no matter how damning a number is - like 26% committing 50% of the crime, Hey it's all good because all the rest of it is down to police bias right? How many, if any are down to police bias. https://www.zippia.com/police-officer-jobs/demographics/ less than 2/3rds of the police force in the US are white. So that means we can roughly rule out 1/3 of the police force prima facie for racism at least. You think every single person left as…
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:48 PM
1

Clearly, you aren't listening. I'm not completely discounting the stat. I'm just giving you several reasons why those stats may not be as accurate or legitimate as you seem to think. If you think I'm wrong, tell me why instead of going back to the same trope which seems to be 'they're stats so they must be legit'.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:43 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ And spare me the 'facts over feelings' bs when you just tried to dismiss my systematic annihilation of your snake analogy bullshit by calling it 'mansplaining'
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:41 PM
1

I literally gave you examples of how the UN favors women above.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:39 PM
2

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21 This isn't the exact one I looked at but says the same thing. Edit: Black people make up 26% of the population not 13% and commit 52.6% of total murders not 50%.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:35 PM
2

Oh yes the sexist reveals her true colors. 'Mansplaining'. Imagine if I said something 'womanexcuses'. If you think it's nonsense then deconstruct it instead of using ad hominem. Unless you can't. No don't bother. I know you can't because whenever people like you have their shit called out you panic and try and cover up your agenda with the absolute garbage that comes out of your mouth. Just admit that you're a sexist.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:27 PM
1

That's not what I said. Yes, I don't trust UN stats, but there is also an OBJECTIVE motive as I have told you about for why those stats have reason to be doubted. You don't seem to be listening. I said that you can't judge character based on observable actions only. Women could have just as much murderous intent as men do but are unable to carry it out because they're weaker. You seem to be agreeing with me actually. So because stats reflect something it gives us reason to prejudge right? So be …
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:25 PM
1

You want...evidence that men are stronger and tougher than women?
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:20 PM
1

No...women's shelters among other things also exist to protect women from physical abuse. This is why it's bullshit from the UN unless you want to make the claim that men don't experience domestic/ physical violence. And as I have mentioned, reciprocal violence in relationships is ~50/50
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/22 06:17 PM
1

Are you intentionally misrepresenting what I'm saying? I never said that. The point about UN women-only shelters was to show you the female bias of the UN as one of the explanations for why I don't trust their stats. I also explained to you why the stat ITSELF is misleading. Come on, I literally spelt out the logical pathway for you
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 06:13 PM
1

I mean you can scoff at it all you want but I just cited 2 examples of UN gynocentric bias to you which you conveniently refuse to address
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 06:11 PM
1

And I already explained why that's the case. You conveniently left that out. Also, shouldn't it be the intent to kill or hurt that you're worried about more so than the actual killing
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 06:10 PM
2

No, that's not what I meant. Humans obviously have a higher level of intellectual capability. Which means they aren't driven by primal instincts to mate. This means that even if someone, INCLUDING WOMEN, wants to have sex with you, they can suppress that urge. It's called self-control. That comparison you made with humans and snakes is a Grade A false equivalence at best and wilfully disingenuous at worse. Snakes operate on a fight or flight response for the most part. Their brains aren't capabl…
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 06:09 PM
2

literally just search those numbers for murder rates of black people in the US
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 06:04 PM
2

Again, that stat is false. The full stat is actually '1 in 4 women raped in college lifetime'. The issue is that it's only calculated based on people who voluntarily went up and said they were raped. Not proved it, only claimed that they were raped. ​ And also, I can understand wanting to protect yourself, but it should never come at the cost of stigmatizing another group. As I mentioned in the thread somewhere, the US population consists of 13% black people that commit 50% of murders. Should we…
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 01:30 AM
2

Idiotic comparison. The biological inclination of snakes is to attack if they feel threatened. They don't have the necessary communicative abilities to articulate their feelings to us before deciding on a violent course of action. Unless you are suggesting that humans are also as primitive.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 01:26 AM
1

Yeah...don't trust those stats at all. Also, it says 80% of victims are male. So I don't understand why you're that worried about women. It's also a misleading stat because men are stronger and tougher than women. So even if women WANT to kill men, they may not have the ABILITY to do it. And the stats on reciprocal domestic violence backs up the claim that men and women are equally violent. The UN has had a long history of gynocentrism whether it be things like advocating for women-only shelters…
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 01:24 AM
2

Ah I see, you ignorant of population demographics. Ok fine then I’ll explain it in context to you. Black people comprise 13% of the US population. You just said that official stats reflect that they constitute 51.1% of murderers. Either you are slow or willfully misinterpreting what I’m saying. When I referred to “your metric” I wasn’t referring to your source for the stats that you cited. Btw my basis for doubting your stats is based on related studies about reciprocal domestic violence/ sexual…
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 10:33 AM
2

Maybe you’d like to explain it more clearly instead of just chucking stats and expecting me to draw the same conclusions you do? I mean even if I assume the numbers are correct (I highly doubt they are). >50% of homicide are committed by black people. That’s a pretty substantial number right? So according to you be wary of them? I don’t even know your metric for this. Who gave you the right to decide what number should be considered as “it’s ok to avoid this group”. Like what’s the threshold for…
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 09:09 PM
3

So….be wary of black people then?
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:52 PM
3

Should I stay wary of black people then? Since they statistically commit more than 60% of crimes in the US despite being what? 13% of the population
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:44 PM
3

No need to censor that word. If we’re unwilling to censor the word incel then there should be no issue with calling women sluts
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:43 PM
3

Adding to that, I’m not sure which country you’re from but for me at least, there’s a legal presumption of probative value outweighing prejudicial effect. This means that even if evidence is obtained illegally it may still be used in court if it has a big impact on the facts of the case
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:39 PM
1

I have some bad news about the stats you just pulled. The way rape is defined as penetration by a penis or penile object it makes it nearly impossible for women to rape men if they don’t peg them
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:36 PM
2

On top of that, I’m very concerned with how she keeps using the prevalence (assuming her figure is accurate) of something to justify blanket assumptions. It’s like saying “Asians don’t get discriminated against as much as Muslims, so it’s not as bad to discriminate against them”. I was under the impression that when something is the wrong thing to do, you don’t do it regardless of how damaging it is
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:32 PM
3

I know lol that’s why I commented this
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:27 PM
2

I’d like to see the source for that. At any rate, male homicide victims vastly exceed the number of female homicide victims. But let’s say we take your figure as true: It still doesn’t invalidate my point. You’re using the propensity of a group to commit homicide as an excuse to prejudge everyone from that group. I thought you guys were all about acknowledging “lived experience” or whatever. What you’re doing is not different than people who say “be careful of all black people since they commit …
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/22 08:26 PM
159

Every person knows it’s not all Jews. But we don’t know which jews. So we stay wary of all Jews. It’s not rocket science. -some guy who failed art school (probably)
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/22 09:57 PM
5

Don’t like spicy food. Have a nut allergy
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 04:30 AM
9

Europes becoming just as bad.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 03:47 AM
5

BLM? ANTIFA? Trans Movement? Climate maniacs? Socialists? Am I getting close?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 03:45 AM
1

I mean conceptually hate speech shouldn’t even be a thing. But yeah this bitch is psycho
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 04:55 AM
23

It would technically be the same suit I think. Under offences against the person. GBH is just the more serious version of ABh
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 08:28 AM
78

I hate to be that guy but something feels really off about this interaction. You don’t change your mind off one Reddit comment. Especially when your view is as hedonistic and despicable as the one you’re holding
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 08:26 AM
148

Yeah so this could actually qualify as actual bodily harm or GBH depending how bad it is. You know, an actual criminal offence…
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 08:22 AM
35

Tbf, and this isn’t discredit to you, I think a rational 12 year old kid could academically annihilate any feminist
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 08:20 AM
2

To me it also depends on who my audience is right. So if it’s a 1v1 kind of thing I don’t really see the need to engage but if it’s a group with fence sitters as you mentioned then that might be more worth my time to engage
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 08:36 PM
2

“I don’t have to tell you why your argument is wrong, because I’m more qualified than you are to make the arguments.” "I'm sure the people who thought the Earth was flat said the same thing to Galileo." I suppose it really depends on who you want to convince. Never thought about the on the fence people that's something I'll consider. I just consider it more of a moral victory to convince the people who disagree with me and to do that I generally try to dumb things down into digestible idiot-proo…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 07:57 PM
4

Beyond that: if I could get away with paying a woman less why wouldn't I just exclusively hire women?
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 07:13 PM
6

When someone says to you, “I have been studying this, therefore I am right about this subject,” even if they have been studying it, it is called an Argument from Authority Fallacy, or an Argument from Accomplishment Fallacy. Both apply. Really, anyone can claim something that is true about any field, and expertise does not imply that someone has made a true claim. Feminists don't understand this. Trust me I've tried explaining using the above terms. Better to say: "Tell me why my argument is wro…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 07:12 PM
2

Above 68%? Nah probably not I mean there are still a good amount of horny assholes out there. It’s funny you talk about the sex offender stats being equal for both genders https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gqdcdj/women_rape_men_almost_as_often_as_men_rape_women/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf I personally think that women get away with a lot because here in England rape statutes are worded such that you can only be considered a rapist if you penetrate with a penil…
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 10:02 PM
6

That’s the thing. It’s not less. Even the feminists aren’t stupid enough to go below 2%. Tbf I’ve seen studies saying the ceiling is 40%, I’ve seen one from BU saying it’s 68%
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 09:55 PM
10

Adding the farce of citing the 2-8% stat about false rape claims which only constitutes probably false claims, leaving out cases which don’t go to trial, get dismissed at the police station, don’t make the legal definition of rape, cases where the accused just bites the bullet because they’re scared to go to trial even though they’re innocent
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/21 08:52 PM
1

Same here. I mean I’m happy to talk about this more in depth to get your opinion. I definitely agree about the equal standard thing. I’d also go further. I don’t understand the idea behind criminalizing the use of a word. Like the N word example, what if I’m a news reporter and using that word in a quotation. What if my friends and I use racial slurs on each other - not to offend, but because we’re close enough that it’s seen as a sign of affection. When intent is marginalized over the act itsel…
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 01:55 AM
2

This is interesting because I’m actually doing a Thesis on this. I’m quite a strong First Amendment absolutist (even though I’m not American) so I don’t agree with outlawing hate speech per se. And even though Reddit isn’t a public organization I still think that it should observe the principles of free speech. But as to the idea that direct comparisons between women and men in the form of misandry and misogyny are held to a double standard on that sub? Yeah that’s been clear for a long time. It…
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/21 01:10 AM
3

That’s a No True Scotsman fallacy. You can’t simply exclude someone from a group simply because they don’t fit the definition of what you consider Feminism should be
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 05:01 PM
6

Nah bro don’t ban them. As someone once said “the best way to reveal the unreasonable opposition is to let them speak, so they can show their unreasonable opinions and then everyone can see it”
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 04:59 PM
1

I mean like....I was half joking when I said this. This is fucking disgusting
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 07:13 AM
3

Ok so if I start fucking a woman without asking and she cums that means it’s not rape because she liked it enough to cum right?
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 12:29 AM
2

Funnily enough I have a friend who managed to train his pet dog to play checkers (he’s not that good). The dog not my friend I mean
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 12:28 AM
1

Hey you never know anymore bro. Isn’t it the law now that a woman can scream rape and the legal burden of proof magically shifts to the man to prove that he didn’t do it? And even if he can prove that it wasn’t him isn’t he still marked for life?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/21 11:48 PM
2

I mean the stats probably will reflect that because under the common law rape requires the penetration of the vagina with a penis. Hence if you’re a woman you can’t commit the crimes of rape. But the entire premise of that statistic is fucked up
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/21 11:44 PM
2

You can keep repeating ad nauseam the No true Scotsman. I noticed however that you specifically stated non first world countries. If that’s the case then you’re admitting that Western society has achieved at the very least equality of the sexes. (It hasn’t and it’s gone way past that into female supremacy but whatever). And if that’s the case then you should stop calling yourself a feminist because outside of western countries all those things done to women in non first world countries are crime…
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/21 11:40 PM
1

Yeah pal that’s because under common law in countries like the UK women can’t legally rape men because they don’t have penises (unless they use phallic objects to penetrate men). Thus most cases which should be female rape on a moral and practical standard get shoved into s4 of the SOA instead of s1/2 rape. You don’t think that skews statistics a bit hmm?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/21 11:37 PM
4

You seemed to be strangely well prepared for this exact question
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 11:37 PM
13

Pretty sure this is satire trying to show how stupid feminists are
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/21 11:35 PM
1

I hate that people are so rigid in their thinking that they assume 2 things can’t be true at once. Nobody detects blame from the rapist - BUT it doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t be held responsible got putting yourself in a dangerous situation. If I walk down a dangerous alleyway at night waving $500 bills in the air it’s still the muggers fault that he robs me but I’m making an extremely stupid decision by choosing to walk there
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 02:32 PM
1

A racist AND a sexist? Intersectionality right there
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 01:01 AM
32

Hollywood is a leftist cesspool with some of the most intolerant bigots I’ve ever seen. I’m not surprised and you shouldn’t be either
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:56 AM
1

I know. Which is why I said they aren't the original source that I got the information from. Ehhhh, I wouldn't say that it having a reputation that's less than pristine immediately detracts from the argument itself. For that, you'd have to actually show me the substantial issues with the claims they're making e.g. who corroborated her story. Anyway, there are many other sources online claiming the same thing that don't all cite from each other. May check out Wiki footnotes actually - might have …
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 12:02 AM
1

Interesting. Do you have any sources on where I can read up about totalitarian regime establishment etc? Thanks
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 11:52 PM
1

Yeah like I said I didn't read it on there at first but I can't find the original piece. Which parties and witnesses are you referring to exactly? Because I haven't seen or heard anything statements that survived a prima facie level of scrutiny during the trial. But anyway yeah like I said I didn't mean there was hard evidence of it - just that you can obliquely infer from her circumstances and the fact that she had no hard proof whatsoever, along with the convenient timing which she chose to br…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 11:38 PM
1

Well, it really just boil to their lack of a penis, and that men and women alike tend to view sexual penetration with something like an object or another part of the body as distinct from penetration with genitalia. If that were to change I'm confident that the law would too, but as it stands it's really just a reflection of societal consensus. Seems like an extremely shallow defence for not reforming the Act if the court system is actually using this as reasoning. It also includes post-operativ…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 11:19 PM
11

lol just search Michael Knowles feminism on YT there are numerous clips of him going to college campuses as part of YAF to debate college students. Not just on feminism either but on other matters as well - it's funny to see how flustered they get when they argue against him. You may also want to check out The Daily Wire on YT if you want to see more of him
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 10:59 PM
1

Another good article that summarizes this quite succinctly is 21 reasons not to believe Christine Ford by theFederalist. Hope this helps
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:21 PM
1

Sure. Will take me a while to find the source I looked at originally for this but you can check out the nypost.com article about it “Christine blasey Ford lies and other commentary” in which the article states that “there is zero evidence that Justice Kavanagh and her ever met” among other claims. https://www.google.com.sg/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/12/02/christine-blasey-fords-lies-and-other-commentary/amp/ In fact you can search “Christine Ford lies” there are numerous articles that expose holes an…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:20 PM
1

I did some research and you’re points still don’t explain why there is a discrepancy in the Act under s1 such that the section doesn’t qualify female rapists. You could possibly say that s4 covers this (and I haven’t fully read through the entire thing yet) but it strikes me as very very strange that your can’t consolidate this into one section and have to spread it out across 1,2 and 3. My suspicions for this could be in how the act is linguistically constructed. The term “rape” seems to give r…
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 09:13 PM
36

Ah Mr Knowles. The polite feminist destroyer. Not as satisfying as Dr Peterson though
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 05:56 PM
1

Then that’s a separate offence. Catcalling minors and catcalling adults isn’t the same thing. And what it may lead to is separate from the act of catcalling. Following people home is stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act. It’s not the same
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/21 02:29 PM
2

Who would report that even if it does happen? And I’m sure it definitely happens? The media who have been firmly biased on the side of the Left and woke mob? And even if they do what makes you think they won’t spin it in such a way to make men at fault? Don’t forget most of these reporters are feminists as well because it’s apparently the “in thing” to do. The government who are the ones legislating to keep such legislation in place? The feminists? Haha. Unfortunately we can’t do much without fr…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 07:06 PM
2

Reform of the SOA has been suggested for the last 15 or so years regarding this specific point about female rapists This petition has been running for 5 months already
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 06:56 PM
3

Also the fact that to criminalize catcalling would be an over criminalization on the grounds of legal moralism and paternalism which has always been dodgy and blurred. This would be like legally punishing adultery which women do at a higher rate than men
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 06:39 PM
4

Imagine thinking that catcalling is a criminal offence and the officers actually agree with you
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 05:58 PM
2

that's my point. the fact that its run for almost 6 months and only received ~1.5k votes is indicative of the double standards and sympathy gap
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 03:17 PM
1

Go look at the disparate number of cops and firemen broken down by gender statistics. I'll do you one better. Look at military gender stats.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:34 PM
1

I love how you deleted your post when people started calling out your bullshit. Not here to discuss I guess - just here to push an agenda
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:32 PM
1

You're making a strawman argument again. You pointing out situations where women were persecuted doesn't cancel out the fact that men have historically been expected to protect women. And since you want to bring that up did you know that men who did similar stuff were also persecuted for being warlocks in the same way
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:30 PM
1

actually no. the 2% stat has been proven to be false for a while now. it doenst take into account cases that don't go to trial, or where men take plea deals because they arent confident enough to go through trial. the actual number is anywhere between 8-64% Edit: I just realized you originally wrote 1/100. So you don't even know the actual stat that was brought up which suggests to me that you don't know your facts and are just rehashing feminist talking points. And btw. Lying about rape is just…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:24 PM
1

So you got your data wrong as well. Most victims of violent crimes including homicide are male. Go check ONS statistics for the UK and FBI stats for the US. And they aren't just 'marginally higher' against males. They are substantially higher against males
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:21 PM
1

Every gender has its own privileges and shortcomings. But when the law constantly legislates to privilege women artificially, through legislation as opposed to innate advantages that each gender has - then I can definitely say that women have it better than men. And since you're on about sexual crimes so much - did you know that where I'm from women can't legally rape men - the most they can be charged with is sexual assault? Which may be a contributing factor to the rape stats that you pulled u…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:12 PM
1

No I don't understand because what you're suggesting is literally a breach of ECHR human rights. There's a reason why sexual harassment at least where I'm from is very carefully regulated and confined to places like the workplace and not public places like you're suggesting. To suggest that I don't agree because I haven't experienced it is you playing identity politics and is arrogant at best. I already told you women sexualize men just as much in woke culture if not more. Women comment on dick …
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 12:02 PM
1

Then like I said it’s not a patriarchy. And also I hate this lie that’s perpetuated that women are constantly being oppressed by men. Western women are among the most privileged people in history EVER. You think being cat called is being oppressed? Come on. If that’s the case what about women like Cardi B who go around saying shit like “broke boys don’t deserve no pussy” and women shaming fat, short and men with small penises. The double standard here is real - is that the patriarchy’s fault as …
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:46 AM
3

Here in the UK at least I don’t see another reform to the Defamation Act after it was literally amended less than 10 years ago. I understand the whole house fly thing but any logical individual without an agenda will tell you that it is incoherent to transpose the actions of a minority group of men onto an ENTIRE GENDER. There nothing about that that’s logically appropriate. I mean I’m against the legalization of stronger drugs like cocaine and stuff (idk if anyone is even pushing that) and I do…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:41 AM
1

You ignored my point. If men are suffering as well it can’t be a patriarchy. When do women take responsibility for their actions instead of deflecting blame to the patriarchy that doesn’t even exist. People who view women as sex objects at the rate you claim are BAD PEOPLE. It has nothing to do with an overarching power struggle. You’re being intellectually dishonest if you claim that women are walking around the streets and getting sexually harassed constantly by men all the time. I know plenty…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:33 AM
1

Yes. That’s precisely my point. I’m not even white and even I know that no one gives a shit if a white person gets shot and killed by a police officer unless it turns into a big public scandal for other reasons. You absolutely should be saying all lives matter if someone dies unnecessarily or unfairly. Literally means “we should treat all life as sacred”. BLM and their literally cajoling other people to support them while they participated in COVID hate around the world towards us and commit wha…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:29 AM
1

That’s what a no true Scotsman is. You don’t get to change the definition of a movement to what you think it should be. Especially when it ignores what the feminist movement is actually doing. This is a separate issue but BLM “the organization/movement” whatever you want to call it is a racist, disingenuous movement as well. I have no problem with the idea that black people’s lives matter but to support the movement is racist. Also you don’t get to undermine or ignore the other side while preach…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:21 AM
3

They won’t do anything on college campuses. Didn’t the whole 1/5 women in college are raped bullshit stat come from your ends? No ones going to help male rape victims after that when the woke mob can shut them down and cancel them at anytime. It’s not completely their fault either. I mean I would have no problem standing up for my gender because I believe that character and integrity are more important than any level of social reputation. But some others don’t have that level of courage about th…
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:18 AM
2

Feminists do not want equality. The no true Scotsman has been rehashed by you lot over and over and over again. I don’t doubt some people who call themselves feminists actually want equality - and if that’s the case you should stop calling yourselves feminists because the movement does not reflect your ideals.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:14 AM
3

I heard. Stems from Bret Kavanagh right? Even though Ford was later proven to have lied about the entire thing?
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:05 AM
2

Yeah the suggestions for reform come up every few years but nothing ever gets done. This is the latest one that didn’t receive support. I’m studying law now and hoping to practice criminal law as a solicitor after my SQE and I know the penetration requirement BUT I don’t UNDERSTAND it
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 11:04 AM
58

Would just like everyone to sit back and think about how fast this would get filled up if we were thinking about criminalizing rape for men. Once again feminists preach equality only when it benefits them. It astounds me that this has received such little support from the UK public as compared to stuff like the public outcry to punish men for the Sarah Everland fiasco. If anyone is interested and wants to sign here’s the link. But I doubt anyone in Parliament will care tbh. What a patriarchy we …
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/21 11:06 PM
7

Not only that but there are literal laws like the Equal Pay Act that prevent people from getting paid differently from doing the same job
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/21 09:58 PM
7

That's a no true scotsman
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 06:00 PM
2

As the sub has mentioned several times, feminism as a movement conceived by its founders has never been about equality. If there are 'good feminists' as you put it, out there who care about equality they should stop using the term 'feminist' to describe themselves since the prefix 'fem' already implies some sort of pro-feminine agenda being the driving force. Egalitarian, or humanist, would be a better term if they are striving for equity for all people
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 05:57 PM
3

yes, as are all feminists
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 05:51 PM
6

This has been discussed here multiple times. Definitist and No True Scotsman fallacies don’t work because a movement isn’t defined but what you SAY, it’s defined by what you DO. If you check what founding members of the movement including simone de beauvoir has said (who has openly advocated for culling of the male gender) then you realize that feminism IS sexism. Also the whole patriarchy thing is nonsense. You can’t just blame everything that ever happens on it. a patriarchy literally means ma…
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 01:54 PM
14

Why the fuck does it matter if the business is male run or female run as long as it does well? That’s down to the individual’s competence - not their gender
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 01:48 PM
2

^ that’s a No True Scotsman fallacy. The whole “they’re not REAL feminists” has been discussed before here
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 01:38 PM
3

Exactly but my point is that we should stop calling it that because it implies that femanazis are a separate group pushing a different agenda from feminists. They’re not. It’s just about how vocal you are as a feminist
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/21 10:05 PM
3

There’s no “femanzi”. We really should stop using that word because it implies that feminism is ok if implemented properly. It’s just feminists - the question is merely how extreme the feminist is
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/21 10:03 PM
10

And yet feminists continue to condone KillAllMen, calling it a joke. Well then this should be regarded as a joke too. Unless of course they’re trying to say that mass genocide of one gender is less offensive than sexual violence against all genders So the question is this: who gets too decide what is a joke and what isn’t? Is it the feminists who clearly love pushing their anti male agenda? Is that fair and equitable - buzzwords that feminists love to use
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/21 09:55 PM
16

Sentencing Reproductive rights The general view that men are disposable The fact that in the US men have to sign up to go to war if the country requires them to just to get a driver’s license The fact that male rape victims are laughed at and told to “be grateful” (actual experience from one of my friends from a feminist) The fact that women want job equality of outcome and yet men are present in dangerous jobs like bricklaying etc at an 11x higher rate than women
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/21 01:18 PM
3

Look mate you’re obviously a trol. A few days ago you made that “I love you” post that was completely irrelevant to this sub. You obviously have no desire to actually discuss the issues we debate here.
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/21 03:54 PM
4

A bag of sweets, a cheeky smile, this cunt is a paedophile
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/21 03:53 PM
13

The group is open to anyone you don’t even have to be an anti feminist. It’s a platform for discussion. All we ask for is civility. Not like those MGTOWBan and FDS cunts
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/21 02:06 AM
27

It seems someone’s out of touch with her own movement
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/21 08:59 AM
5

It is absolutely a checkmate. I literally asked this question to one of them a few days ago and she couldn’t answer me with any concrete laws except one shaky one involving women not being able to go topless in public, and even then that’s because female breasts are sexualized while the male chest isn’t. On the other hand there exists (among at least 50 legal or stigma privileges have) a huge category of reproductive rights (in the US) that women enjoy over men
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/21 08:03 AM
2

I wouldn’t bother it’s a misandrist sub there are a lot more of them than you. And also if they want to be dumb bitches let them be. They won’t be a threat
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/21 03:15 AM
1

Lol was this based on the reply one of them made to my comment on a post a few days ago?
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 08:50 PM
18

Equality
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 09:21 AM
8

Now imagine if I put in male suicide rates and deaths on the job
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 09:13 AM
2

Well you’d have to look at the composition oh people who make up feminists. To my knowledge many of us don’t support feminism at all. Most of those who do are on the left. Let’s also not pretend like the left are an upright and moral people. Some of the most bigoted hateful and discriminatory sentiments have come from the left. At both extremes the right and the left are equally bad
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 08:19 AM
3

No it doesn’t that’s why I said it also depends on when you choose to carry out the abortion. Rape is a special case because it’s also unfair to make the mother bear the cost of having a child when she didn’t knowingly assume the risk, and that should be factored in when assessing whether it is morally right to abort
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 08:01 AM
8

Depends on when the abortion happens. But GENERALLY no, other than cases of rape, incest and danger to the mother’s life - all of which occur at exponentially low rates. Basically this whole thing about woman’s body her choice is absolute nonsense. It isn’t an excuse to carry out an abortion. I want a pregnant person to grow a pair and take some personal responsibility for their actions. You’re mature enough to have sex? Then you’re also mature enough to bear the consequences of something going …
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/21 07:57 AM
16

No they aren’t. You conflate confident with opinionated. Opinionated men are seen as assholes. Opinionated women are seen as bitches. And rightly so
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 10:23 PM
1

Then say that you want to start a movement called the Meninist movement and say it’s for equality and see what they say. I mean it’s genuinely not that hard to talk to them. 2 minutes into any conversation and any person with an IQ above Room Temperature in Celsius could stumble upon some kind of double standard
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 02:17 PM
4

Very simple way for you to talk to them: if it’s about equality, why include the prefix “fem”. Why not just call it humanitarian/egalitarianism
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 02:10 PM
1

I haven’t heard that yet. Do you have a source for it?
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 02:08 PM
3

Oh it’s complete vile bullshit that they’re pedaling over here trying to make the murder of an innocent girl by an asshole into a political weapon as though this is somehow evidence of the patriarchy. It’s not. It’s a crime done by a bad man. End of. Politicizing it (like what the misandrists are doing) is fucking disgusting With regards to the 97% figure I’m calling straight bs on that as well. First of all - the women who lie in order to promote the patriarchy nonsense. Secondly, from my frien…
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 06:31 AM
41

Ok? I don’t know if you’re being childish or ignorant. It’s hard to know since we’re trying to have a mature discussion on this sub and then you come up with immature crap like “your mum”. How many of these laws are actively enforced? In the UK it’s illegal to be drunk and be in charge of cattle at the same time - I don’t think anyone actually still enforces this law. Which states. More importantly: why are you assuming all rapists are men. Are you sexist? Already repealed. And also same issue^ …
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 05:09 AM
3

I think the fact that she defends Sakura is even worse than her opinion
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 01:46 AM
5

Women are disgusting I’m gay now
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 01:45 AM
48

Not really. To an extent all feminists don’t really want equality - they want female supremacy or at least for females to get the benefits that men get while paying nothing for it. This is because all feminists believe in the idea of the patriarchy which means that they think that all men benefit systemically while all women are actively oppressed by men and the societal structure. That is nonsense. Even the original voting rights that women eventually received from 1st wave feminism are a form …
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/21 01:44 AM
10

I guess I’m a major part of the problem then
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/21 02:46 PM
8

A feminist so blinded by her misandrist agenda that she takes half formulated arguments into a QA/Debate forum against a guy who literally studies this sort of thing for a living? Shock. Horror. Definitely the first time one of them has done some stupid shit like this.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/21 02:07 PM
6

Same thing is happening here with Sarah Everand btw. Sexists trying to claim it was a patriarchy thing. It’s not. It’s a corrupt police thing. Feminists trying to twists everything to suit their agenda
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/21 10:51 PM
20

It’s not just radical feminists btw. It’s all feminists because all feminists believe in the patriarchy
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/21 10:25 PM
7

Because they want female supremacy not equality so anything that challenges the narrative that men might not have it so good is vehemently attacked/ignored by feminists, including the legal privileges that women have over men
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/21 10:24 PM
10

Ah yes here we finally see the pendulum completely shift to trying to justify not just feminism, but radical feminism. For all the talk about listening to women they sure apply a different standard when it comes to listening to men
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/21 10:22 PM
29

Do they not realize that I could literally just change the title to this to “not all women” and it would apply just the same? Being a shit person applies to both genders. If you generalize against one gender then you’re a sexist
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/21 10:19 PM
1

I sort of disagree with the premise of this question. Am uncomfortable with the idea that you can attribute certain personality or character or behavioral traits to a certain gender. Why can’t it just be “this man/woman is being a cunt” w/o linking it to gender
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 05:07 AM
1

Equality of opportunity? Yes Equality of outcome? No I assume Equitability refers to the former so yes
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 05:04 AM
1

I mean this was posted 73 days ago but there are a number of logical errors in your response. The biggest one is that you’re arguing from emotion and not logic. You’re basically saying we should disregard stats because of how people feel. That does not equate to rape culture. There are CASES of rape but that doesn’t mean that society tolerates and encourages rape. You’ve provided no contradictory evidence but yet you’re asserting that it exists. This is a logical fallacy. And finally men bringin…
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/21 03:02 AM
1

Ah so rape culture is then the politicization of dangerous forces sex in order to push the feminist/LW agenda? Though tbf she did mention that she found it unfair that Biden got to run even after the allegations against him
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 08:32 PM
1

Yeah that’s my issue with this whole thing because at the end of the day it comes down to who blinks first. Blinking in this case being the operative word akin to asserting the argument because that’s who the burden of proof lies on. For my part I don’t physically see how I can justify something that doesn’t exist. The only way I can do that is if she points out something that is supposedly manifested by rape culture and then I can say well no actually this isn’t the case because xyz. So I’m kin…
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 08:25 PM
2

Ok I get your point. So what would you argue as evidence for such a culture not existing? Edit: I completely agree about the patriarchy nonsense for example because I can use examples like the wage gap myth which I would like to know for “rape culture”
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 08:14 PM
1

No the point that she was making is that rape culture exists to the detriment of both men and women. So I was wondering how to argue this because of the anecdotal examples
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 07:01 PM
1

No I’m asking you to clarify your second point. You said there are other causes so what are they
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 06:59 PM
1

What other causes are there in your second point?
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 05:22 PM
1

I’m confused slightly. Let’s say I’m Devil’s Advocate. Couldn’t it be said that because it’s hard to prove by design, not because of society, it still encourages the behavior because rapists know that there is a greater chance of them getting away with it? Could you please also explain the non sequins part - if I make anecdotal claims like the ones above (and assuming most people including men feel the same way) then why is that not evidence of a rape culture? I don’t think it is either but I ca…
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/20 03:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter