TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alias-of-a-girl Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by alias-of-a-girl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Your description of pathological sex makes that impossible - pathology implies a lack of health. What I'm saying is that having a lot of sex isn't necessarily a pathological behaviour. If you're going to argue with me, at least read the arguments before you respond.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 09:43 PM
2

Yeah? Show me the psychological studies that reveal any kind of pathology in having sex. Because there are DOZENS of pathologies that come of having too little sex or being afraid of sex (or afraid of being judged for having it). You can pretend it's pathological all you want. You can say the sky is green all you want, too. Doesn't make it true.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 05:34 PM
1

Only because obesity is unhealthy and makes the person who is obese miserable. Having a lot of sex is frankly great and very healthy, assuming you take some standard precautions (like wearing a condom). Really, not so different from making sure the food you're eating comes from a trusted source (that is to say, is not going to poison you). And why differentiate between types of sex? So long as there's consent with everyone involved, who cares what someone does with someone else?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 05:22 PM
2

Having sex with a consenting adult is not a pathological behaviour, it's human nature. And it only has negative social consequences when the people around you are prudish and afraid of natural human functions. And that's not even beginning to cover the fact that generally, sex between consenting adults leaves both parties happy and satisfied, where are pedophilia scars one party for the rest of their fucking life. Not even remotely similar.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 02:06 PM
1

I suspect that you have a high partner count Oh good. You accuse me of making assumptions about you, and then you start making assumptions about me! As it happens, I have only ever had one partner (my husband). So no, I'm not offended because I relate to these so-called sluts. I'm offended because you're all sitting on your high horses making nasty judgments about people based on stupid shit. "Sluts" run the gambit from wonderfully amazing people to incredibly scummy and impossible to be around,…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 02:05 AM
-1

Prioritizing fleeting physical pleasure, because you wanna -- because you have the RIGHT! -- because anybody who thinks you're wrong to do so is stupid and society is all fucked up and you should be able to do whatever you want -- that is NOT a healthy attitude. See, that's where I would disagree. Deciding to do something that is causing no objective harm to yourself regardless of what other people think is very healthy. It is, in fact, how we gained the right to do a lot of things. It's how bla…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 08:45 PM
0

That wasn't intended to be an ad hominem. I was just pointing out that, if there are trust issues so deep that you can't trust a potential girl not to sleep around, the issue probably isn't that she's promiscuous. She might be untrustworthy for a myriad of other reasons, or maybe you have trust issues. I'm not saying it's one or the other, all I mean to say is that her sexual habits before meeting/dating you are pretty far down the list of problems that such a potential relationship would have.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 07:46 PM
0

Right, because doing anything for immediate pleasure ever is somehow abandoning long-term happiness... And I never said here and now. Doing something that feels good may mean that it feels good in the future (getting a degree, or going to the gym might qualify there), but we still only ever do those things because they are worth the pain now for the pleasure in the future.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 07:27 PM
-5

If you don't trust her not to sleep around, there are bigger issues at play there than her sexual habits before she met you...
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 07:17 PM
0

And I'm saying maybe it's time you changed it up to Captain-Save-A-Bitch, because the problem here is that she was being a bitch. Her sexual activities have literally nothing to do with whether or not she was worth going out on a limb for. And maybe you'd find more women would stop being bitches to you if you stopped calling us sluts.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 06:48 PM
0

See, to me, a good decision is the decision made by a person who has weighed the pros and cons of something and then made a sound decision based on that. So what if a woman puts greater emphasis on her pleasure than she does on what other people think of her? And so long as she's safe about her sex, maybe she's decided that the pleasure is worth the minimal risk of pregnancy/STDs - that's not unreasonable. If people decided not to do anything that involved risk, we'd never get out of bed in the …
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 06:01 PM
-1

What, you don't think actual intercourse feels better than masturbation? Have you never actually had sex? Of course it does! It's WAY more enjoyable than masturbation! Plus it's fun to have it with someone you get along with, even if you aren't necessarily interested in a long-term exclusive relationship. Just because you aren't personally interested in casual sex doesn't make it evil and unhealthy. THAT's a way more unhealthy attitude to have than any attitude concerning casual sex. And when I …
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 05:25 PM
-6

I want this because it feels good, both physical and emotionally. OH FUCKING NO! A woman wants to do something she might actually enjoy! IT'S THE END OF THE FUCKING WORLD! Oh wait. That's what everyone always does. I'll be honest, if someone went through all the pros and cons of a given decision like that every time they made a decision, the world would be a better place. What you've shown here is the exact OPPOSITE of undisciplined and impulsive. I am going to do what feels good, despite the la…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 05:06 PM
-6

You're making a lot of unfounded assumptions here. Having random recreational sex with lots and lots of people is extremely unhealthy for your psyche. Even forgetting the STD and pregnancy risks for a moment. It's damaging behavior. It also demonstrates a complete lack of discipline and impulse control, narcissistic and self-gratifying tendencies, and a very poor attitude toward love, sex, and relationships that speaks very negatively about an individual's ability to have healthy and successful …
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 04:44 PM
-2

But those places are rare and as it turns out, that kind of sexual equality - where men and women are treated the same - doesn't work. Who says? I've never actually seen a place where men and women are actually and truly treated as equals. And the places that come the closest are the ones that seem to me to be the best places to live. Gender roles suck. Men and women are different because people are different. You can't talk to half the world's population as if we're all the same, because we're …
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 04:32 PM
-7

Oh, having lots of sex is horribly unhealthy, is it? Shit, I'd never want a relationship with you. What, do you allow your SO sex once a month? It's NOT unhealthy at all if you take the appropriate precautions. Wear a condom or limit yourself to people you know are clean. There, health problems solved. It's not an addiction, either, because it's easily possible to stop should one be presented with a reason to do so, and it doesn't negatively impact the rest of their lives. And just because somet…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 04:21 PM
-5

I'm no longer invested in attracting you any more... Just don't bitch and complain when I tell you that your not LTR material. Good. Then I've dodged a potential bullet in that situation, because if your biggest indicator of whether someone is LTR material is whether they put out on the first date, you're obviously not interested in any kind of meaningful relationship. All you care about is the chase, which is fine, but I'm not interested in being the target of your chase. I want an actual relat…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:42 PM
-2

Whether a girl sleeps around is obviously important to a guy who is interested in having a relationship with her. If you want in a monogamous relationship with her, then you have to trust her not to continue sleeping around once that relationship starts. And if you don't trust her to do that, why the fuck do you want a relationship with her in the first place? This is such a huge double standard. Why can guys get away with sleeping around but a girl who does it is a slut? You can not want to dat…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:23 PM
-5

No, it's really not. Because if you want in a monogamous relationship with her, then you have to trust her not to continue sleeping around once that relationship starts. And if you don't trust her to do that, why the fuck do you want a relationship with her in the first place?
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:12 PM
-6

Bullshit. Whether someone sleeps around has literally nothing to do with how nice of a person they are. You know that women who sleep around can actually be really great people, but generally calling them sluts isn't the best way to get on their good side. So the reason you haven't met many who "aren't bitches" might be because you start off by calling them names.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 02:49 PM
-2

You posted them here as a response to the article, so whether they're originally your words or not, you presented them as at least representing your beliefs. You're using semantics to try to get out of defending your own post.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 01:28 PM
-7

I don't get what her being a 'slut' has to do with any of this! She was a bitch and THAT'S a valid reason to tell her to fuck off, but who the fuck cares who she sleeps with?
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 01:27 PM
0

The difference between a pedophile and non-pedophile is a matter of being able to control yourself to the point where you don't commit a crime and can stop yourself from irreversibly harming a child. That's not the same thing as having a lot of sex with consenting adults. At all.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 01:25 PM
-4

Thank you. Why does it matter that she slept with Steve? Answer: it doesn't. Just saying, if guys are gonna keep complaining that women don't put out, maybe ya'll should stop calling us sluts afterwards...
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 01:23 PM
1

Good point. I hadn't thought of that, but a woman usually 'wins' a divorce. Would a prenup not at least help to fix that?
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:27 AM
2

I think my problem when it comes to understanding a man's reluctance to marry is that I can't comprehend doing that to a person - taking his house, his car, his kids. That's cruel and dishonest and only shows that you think you can't take care of yourself and that, even when the relationship is over, you need someone else to take care of you. I would never want that and, as such, the thought of of a woman holding that over her husband as a threat honestly didn't even occur to me. Thanks for poin…
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:25 AM
1

Lol I AM supporting that statement. Sort of. I don't think marriage is a bad idea, I think a ball-less man marrying a manipulative woman and subsequently becoming an entirely different person is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:20 AM
1

And given that background previously, I probably wouldn't have been so harsh. On the other hand, your parents might be crazy, but the elder generation on the whole is not so lacking in common sense...
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:19 AM
7

Another reason for my suspicion of marriage is that it figuratively castrates a man. Pardon my inflammatory language. The only men I know my age who are married are goody two shoes, and pretending to be so. It has cost them their authenticity. If a man is castrated by marriage, he never had any balls to begin with. I'd never marry such a passive doormat, less a husband and more a servant. A man who changes entirely for fear of his wife's wrath isn't worth my (or anyone else's) time, except perha…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 07:05 AM
1

Hmmm... the point about the substandard experience due to the 'don't hit women' thing is a good point. I can't count the number of orange belt men I've had to beat the tar out of before they'd actually try to hit me. Never had that problem fighting girls.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 06:44 AM
1

I'm not saying men's only classes shouldn't exist. If you've got a chick who is only interested in kicking you in the nuts, then, hell, start one up and kick her the fuck out. On the other hand, I don't appreciate men using self-defense practice as an excuse to grope my chest, so I can see the draw of a women's only class. The point I'm trying to make is that co-ed classes are not always the answer - not that men's only classes shouldn't be allow while I support women's only classes. All three o…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 06:39 AM
1

I like how you assume I'm a feminazi right off the bat.... It's funny because I'm actually a supporter of men's rights. That's not the same as suggesting that men and women are the same, however, because we're not. There is a REASON that sports events (notably the Olympics) are split into men's and women's: in the end, the women would all their their asses handed to them by the men, because, yeah, you're bigger and stronger than us. When it comes to physical activities of most types, women somet…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 06:35 AM
8

Normally I'd agree, but martial arts are extremely male-dominated and many women are intimidated by the idea of training with men because, honestly, you're bigger, stronger and scarier than us. Certainly not all women have that issue (I train in karate with men, personally) but I could certainly see how martial arts would be one of those things where a woman might be simply uncomfortable training with men. Hence the need for a female-only martial arts club. It can actually work both ways - it's …
/r/MensRights25/11/10 05:53 AM
1

eye roll The feminist has it all wrong. That Disney is moving towards male stars is not evidence of sexism (by which I mean discrimination against females) - rather, it's evidence of the other extreme: discrimination against boys. I mean, how many little girls love Toy Story and Winnie the Pooh regardless of the gender of the stars? Plenty, and I've met none who are ashamed of that. On the other hand, how many little boys like Snow White or Beauty and the Beast? I have no idea, because no little…
/r/MensRights25/11/10 05:22 AM
0

Damn. It's hard enough for a woman to come forward about being raped without having to worry about people suggesting it's a false accusation due to some messed up hatred of men. Of course, when psycho women do things like this, they're just making it harder on women who have actually BEEN raped. Not to mention the obvious: the poor innocent guy did time for no reason other than her feminazi-ism. She needs to do serious time for this.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 06:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter