| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Mainstream deeming men with limited earning prospects "ineligible for marriage" or "unmarriageable" demonstrates that women seek to cast aside their own traditional gender roles while continuing to impose them on men. "Unilateral imprisonment".Look... I have a media comms degree and when I graduated I realised that the bullshit spin you read from these outlets was not worth my student debt. Journalism in this form is hyped click bait.... honestly, it’s like reading a bloody tabloid- it doesn’t necessarily speak for the general public! It’s simply using hyperbole to exacerbate and bate response. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/20 12:43 AM |
| 1 | Mainstream deeming men with limited earning prospects "ineligible for marriage" or "unmarriageable" demonstrates that women seek to cast aside their own traditional gender roles while continuing to impose them on men. "Unilateral imprisonment".This thread seems a little out of touch to be honest. There will always be exceptions to any rule... but feminism in 5th wave, & as a broader concept is one that pertains to equality. Feminism is just as much for men as it is for women. The idea that women want higher pays but want men to earn more is quite preposterous, it’s same pay for equal work load, it’s acknowledgement for work at home and a shared home/house workload. Look at Jacinda Arden, her partner is beloved and is there as a stay a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/20 12:00 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter