TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

all_you_need_to_know Archive

View 0 posts and 305 comments by all_you_need_to_know on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I disagree about having a belief about women makes one a misogynist, misogyny should be more in how such a belief is held than what belief is held. Do they use the idea to justify awful treatment of women, then yes that's misogyny
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 08:26 PM
2

I would hypothesize that women in general are less motivated by age and more by status, dependability, and promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:54 AM
1

Why do you think that anyone would attempt to make her submissive? Is there a law in TRP that implies this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:50 AM
1

What if the target has an inflated sense of self worth? Aren't you then doing them a favor if you help to bring it in line with reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:34 AM
1

How much seduction literature have you seriously read? Because this would never appear in any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:33 AM
1

Because TRP and Seduction communities have their own vocabulary. These are just the terms that were adopted.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:32 AM
4

This is a really low quality reply and is in bad faith. Not what I expect to find here. You could at least elaborate on your position using his first part's questions as a guide.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:33 PM
2

Divorce rates, the existence of and the popularity of the red pill as an ideology shows that there is a great need in this area
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 08:13 PM
5

This is a great thread (genuinely).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:42 PM
1

Woah, I really like this answer, how well supported is this in blue pill circles?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:41 PM
1

Do you have a source to back up this, from what I can tell, completely unsubstantiated belief?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:39 PM
4

Dude wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:19 PM
1

Because it doesn't claim that the sexes are equal. Fundamentally it claims the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 02:18 PM
1

Love this post
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:50 AM
8

Surely you see that a man should be free to have sex recreationally , without any intention to create a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 12:48 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:00 AM
3

Wow, much sociopath
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 02:01 AM
3

Sorry for invoking that argument. Are you well read philosophically? If not Aristotle is an excellent place to start. Nichomachean ethics in particular.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:51 AM
4

You are not educated on what ethics is then. Try some Aristotle.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:07 AM
4

Ethics should trump science every time.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:43 AM
26

It's them being lazy and going the artsy/easier/self-rewarding routes. I think that you're being a bit unmeasured.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:31 PM
5

What influenced your ideas on this, I am intrigued
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 06:05 AM
2

In the words of a great SRSer, YOU ARE DERAILING BEARDFACE
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 02:50 AM
2

Can't tell if serious, pretty sure not
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 04:14 PM
2

One data point does not a trend make.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 04:03 PM
1

Sources for other analyses similar to yours
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:59 AM
1

Why do they not want to say something?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:41 AM
1

Very compelling, but without sources I can't affirm these things.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:37 AM
1

Awww yisss
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:21 AM
2

I'd suggest someone analyze this further and post again.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:13 AM
0

A person can call themselves by all these labels. These are labels and you shouldn't take them so seriously. A person's stated positions/stances are much more important.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:04 AM
1

That doesn't seem fair. Just because they don't write about it doesn't mean anything
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:01 AM
1

Your position isn't mainstream at all. There are many moderate feminists that are potential allies.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:59 PM
-1

Pretty vile stuff you've written here
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:58 PM
0

Define what kind of event and what percent you mean by common please.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:57 PM
2

Wait, she claims to have recently been assaulted?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:54 PM
1

I agree and applaud your effort
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:52 PM
1

That's pretty sexist. Even if true. The PC police have been alerted. I'd say it's pretty rare to see anyone change their mind online.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:51 PM
0

Many kinds of radical feminism are a derivative of Marxism. But this is not at all true of all feminists. I am a Feminist and an MRA, I consider myself a libertarian or legal feminist.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:48 PM
2

Link?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:44 PM
2

I'd agree that all the feminists with power seem to be radicals. What a disappointing non staatement
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:43 PM
0

This is almost assuredly a failure of imagination on your part
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:45 AM
1

It's not just institutional, it's both in the government and among the people, that makes it pervasive and inescapable.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:20 AM
1

None of those things are true. GETOUT
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:19 AM
5

Intersectionality is one of the best ideas for understanding social inequality.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:18 AM
3

/r/justneckbeardthings
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:41 PM
1

Founder of the men's rights movement? Bah, don't make me laugh
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:51 AM
15

Welcome! Please be aware that this space is fairly laissez faire in it's moderation, there are some true misogynist jerks, but the vast majority I've seen are good people.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:48 AM
1

it has to do with usage, writers of dictionaries capture the spirit of the current usage of a language, and do not attempt to pass judgement thereupon
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:57 AM
3

AMR?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:51 AM
0

It smells really redpilly in here.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:33 PM
1

I am a professional web designer, I love love love that you are going with a more METRO (see metro - design pattern language on wikipedia) however, the colors are too light. The contrast between the post boxes and the background is too subtle, the men's rights logo should also be redesigned as a two tone design with no bezel/emboss. Also it should be smaller and amply padded in where it rests, as well as being centered. Also the visited text color is too light as well.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 11:26 PM
4

Happened to me as an infant, when I learned of it at 21-22, I had a meltdown lamenting what I had lost, burned a lot of bridges, went into a horrible depression, got counseling, it didn't help, decided to take control, was able to convalesce slowly on my own terms, I am happy now. My relationship with my parents is now very strong, and I am re-establishing connections.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:15 AM
7

Sorry you had to go through all of that, I too have suffered much by the first you mentioned. How are you doing nowadays?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:01 AM
1

Also I'm actually against unrealistic images in media. I am a bit of a radical here though. I do want to ban photoshop and make up in human body things. It's a wise decision. What are the negatives exactly?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:18 AM
2

where is the link? I want to see how downvoted it has become
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:09 AM
1

Actually a lot of women are naturally beautiful like this, you just wouldn't know it because they aren't all like femen. Many people prefer modesty and do not flaunt their bodies because it is in bad taste to make others feel bad for what they cannot change about themselves.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:06 AM
1

Assault does not require touch. Assault is presenting a threat or danger to someone with intent to harm, it's usually conditional.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:32 AM
-4

oh jeezbus
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:30 AM
1

Interesting, thanks for posting this.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:29 AM
1

Interesectionality is a totally valid concept on its own. And it's really quite simple too, it's some of the other things that a lot of feminists get indoctrinated on.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 12:00 AM
5

Or Micho Kaku
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:56 PM
8

Tomorrow, I'll still be sciencing it up, not giving a fuck, ladies you can join the party if you want.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:54 PM
4

You're a zombie aren't you! Admit it!
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:53 PM
3

I honestly am not quite sure how this qualifies as anti-MRA. The point he's making about an alleged conversation with an author is a bit strange, but it's a valid point, even if an author wanting to pander to a specific audience is also a bit weak. The Zimmerman joke is terrible...Can someone break down how this invalidates/attacks the MRA worldview?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:25 AM
6

made me lol pretty hard.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:20 AM
3

I don't know you're post is just doubled down satire or not... But this is hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:20 AM
1

What country's laws are you referring to?
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:34 AM
6

I agree with you completely, her body, her choice, her financial responsibility.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:07 AM
0

That's fine, you don't own her body.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:49 AM
7

I think most support pro-choice, however, most here support choice for both parents, a man should be able to choose when he becomes a father, and a woman should be able to choose when she becomes a mother.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:49 AM
2

I'm not sure why you have been downvoted so much, but you're right, of course, perhaps it's because op wants sympathy?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:47 AM
6

Or appear uninterested in them, doing something else. Get in your car and appear wounded...
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:43 AM
4

Ask them to clarify what they mean by feminist exactly. If they can't give you a specific practicable definition, then ask how you could rightly consider calling yourself by such a nebulous label. First, remember that they will most likely be able to out argue you, they are liberal arts majors mostly.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:43 PM
2

So here is how you handle them screaming over you. Acknowledge their points, subsume them and work towards a hybrid approach that would acknowledge both issues. Move beyond their normal layers of defense. They are programmed to argue on certain points. Recognize them and move the discussion to an area where they aren't programmed. You won't put a dent in armor that is already there.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:41 PM
2

You need to realize they have a mental disorder. Don't engage them, just attempt to defuse and move on. Don't lend legitimacy to their struggle.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:07 AM
1

bitter at feminists and what they have done to many women over a lifetime of education. On guard and scared, don't let the door hit you. PEACE OUT FUCK YOU
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:56 AM
2

I've seen some above average intelligences in there. They usually come from a strong Marxist perspective though and are unable to entertain other viewpoints.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:18 AM
1

slow clap
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:43 PM
10

Actually think your statement through, do you really have a right to be irresponsible? Like drinking and driving?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:41 PM
3

Well, what if I'm asleep and a girl starts giving me oral, rape, I get an erection, and she lowers herself on me. Bingo, double rape. If I'm awake and she physically forces me to get aroused, and then uses me, rape. Shall I go on?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:14 AM
-17

Please, don't sensationalize the title, you aren't helping anything when you do that.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:27 PM
4

Excellent write up, probably a little biased towards skepticism though.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:26 PM
1

Thank you for clarifying with me, it's just a subtle distinction I suppose, I missed it reading this. They should definitely specify which they are referring to.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:35 PM
1

It's interesting how males are far more likely to commit suicide. But, according to this, don't men and women attempt suicide equally?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:10 PM
-3

I am not a troll look at my post history boiiiieeeeee
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:41 PM
1

YOU'RE WELCOME BRAVE SOUL
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:44 AM
7

John Carmack is amazing...Incredible developer.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:43 AM
10

yeah yeah yeah, women good, men bad, we heard you the first time...You have nothing interesting to say, please leave.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:37 AM
1

Show me your data.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:10 AM
5

I agree, but deliberate evil makes one deserving of ruin.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:20 AM
1

prison labor is fucking criminal
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:19 AM
2

As long as the man and the woman are consenting I see it as largely equivalent in terms of analogy.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:54 AM
1

a radical crazy one, very few real world feminists believe like this, we should be attempting to bridge with those who have common values to us, and yet we focus on the 1% of online crazies
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:49 AM
1

don't contribute to the mythos, just try to ignore them, they really are losing, quite considerably too, they are just noisy.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:48 AM
-7

stop spreading FUD, they are bad, but they aren't a real hate group. Some of them are mentally ill yes, but they should be pitied more than feared.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:47 AM
-3

Hey, guys, it's wrong to downvote someone for asking for you to back up a claim, no matter how snarky, I want to see the source too! Get to it!
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:46 AM
3

You aren't being helpful either, be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:08 AM
2

That's fine so long as they can support it by themselves.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:33 AM
2

That's pretty easy, like, all of them
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:02 AM
1

I totally agree! Frankly, I'd be willing to pay the whole cost of the abortion, since the woman does have to undergo the procedure, but I think you're right, the most egalitarian sounding option is to split the cost evenly.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:19 AM
1

That's not really bodily autonomy as his body isn't being essentially harmed . Money is being exacted of him, I consider that financial autonomy.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:52 AM
2

Such an option gives the woman entirely too much determination over the male's life. Regardless of the "point" it infringes upon another humans liberty without their consent. Would you appreciate it if child support were forced upon you? Do you consider sex as consent to possibly having to pay child support for 18 years? It doesn't seem fair.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:31 AM
2

She has total legal responsibility, keeping the fetus and placing responsibility the resultant child on the man seems unfair. If the male had some choice in whether the fetus would be aborted, I could then understand your point of view. As it stands, it seems that you view a male having sex as de facto consent to providing child support while you view women having sex as merely consenting to have the freedom to not have a child. This is sexist. If women deserve consequence free sex without the r…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:27 AM
1

It's not really bodily autonomy for the male except insofar as he is free to have sex as he pleases (with consenting partners of course), however it's more that his liberty is respected and preserved.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:24 AM
1

Platonistic...I don't think you are using that term...correctly. Unless you mean the gender essentialist mindset. A reference to platonic forms and ideals maybe?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:48 AM
3

I'm not saying I agree, I suspend judgement unless I must make a decision, all I mean is that having been a victim of a severe traumatic circumstance, you often times wonder if the survivors are really the lucky ones.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:45 AM
3

In some ways I'm sympathetic to the argument that depending upon the severity, that it in fact can be worse.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:04 AM
3

Which part exactly? Or are you just being snarky?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:19 AM
5

I totally agree
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:22 AM
0

I'm not really a feminist in any of the ways the word is used on reddit. I just consider myself an egalitarian. I'm not an ideologue. All I meant was that saying wikipedia is garbage is a huge exaggeration.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:21 AM
-1

Some did. But most didn't, most feminist I meet in real life are pretty much for women to have the sensible rights that everyone (mostly) believes they should have. With regard to my experience in the real world (not on the internet) I too consider myself a feminist right there with them, but I am many other things too, and one of them is an MRA.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:09 AM
-1

It's not garbage. You aren't being helpful. Shoo
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:08 AM
7

Fantastic!
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:35 AM
1

I think you're correct but I think you just expressed it very poorly, also, it's somewhat ancillary to the point was trying to make as you have to assume quite a lot about what he meant by those few terms.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:32 AM
-11

Some proof would be nice.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:24 AM
2

Please, please stop linking to the daily mail.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:22 AM
18

There's quite a number of rapey things that our culture would do well to shed. However I'd propose that we should avoid using rape culture as a term, whenever possible. Abandoning it, and instead using thoughtful descriptions of human behavior would be an excellent start. Usually most of what is called rape culture usually can be explained better in terms of cultural deconstruction. These buzzwords like rape culture and patriarchy should be avoided like the plague yes, but not all people that us…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:15 AM
1

If you could provide strong sources which would appeal to both feminists and MRAs, I'd be interested in such a list, even if I have to wait a few days. Please, please do this.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:10 AM
1

If I could have a child through a surrogate mother with a decent amount of choice on the egg's dna...I would probably do it in a heartbeat...Maybe not today, but in a few years.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:34 AM
29

Or people that would love to have children and not likely be screwed over someday for it.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:12 AM
8

I think he meant it's a feature not a bug.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:11 AM
0

You're not going to be called a concern troll because this isn't fucking SRS. That term needs to die for rational discourse to thrive. Either your argument is sound or it isn't, it doesn't matter whether it was sarcasm, or satire, or trolling, reasonable arguments should be able to trump all, and if they can't, we go back to refine and reformulate them.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:31 AM
1

source?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 11:10 PM
8

/r/atheism just had a coup d'etat, this last week, believe it or not after the blood was cleaned up things have gotten a lot better.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:53 AM
0

I really wish we had more raw data to work with. Hell if someone had publicly available to me, gigabytes of data, I'd load them up to look at it myself. I'm a computer scientist, this is the sort of thing I was born for.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:06 AM
15

I would. Anger is great for motivation, when it comes time to act, we should be surgical, pristine, and stoic.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:50 AM
6

This is a pretty slanted article. Calling her a paedophile is sinking to the mudslingers' level.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:08 PM
1

WRONG. The feminist are in power in this subject domain, the best way to dismantle feminism is from within. Remember the three E's: embrace, extend, eradicate
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:11 AM
4

Yes, I agree, the big problem is the disconnect between feminist's formal theory and their actions. They are often capable of acknowledging Men's rights issues however, it seems that they have a lot of trouble putting that knowledge into action.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:04 AM
2

I was not talking about the original post, I was replying to this guy saying what's up with this whole rape obsession, it's because rape is kind of a big deal, for both men and women. This original post is of course a horrible example, but real rape does happen, and quite a lot.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:49 AM
-1

For sure. I wonder though if it's just cycles of irrational people. Sigh...
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:57 AM
5

Will you please elaborate? I mean rape is a big deal for all genders, sexes, and identities, man and woman alike both suffer from rape, and both male and female alike perpetrate it.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:25 AM
0

I urge you to not shut down, there are people like the guy in this video who are worth knowing. Furthermore, they're valuable allies. If you can't compassionately reach out then at least do so for political reasons, perhaps your heart will be able to follow your actions. Fake it till you make it, with compassion for others viewpoints? Should you really have to fake that? Isn't that really fucked up?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:12 AM
-44

What's up with the whole rape obsession? Rape is kind of a big deal...
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:10 AM
-1

Ok, I'm not sure if you are trolling with the pronouns, as a language nerd, it hurts my heart.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:06 AM
1

There are androgynous men. There are manly women. What does your "hypothesis" (which by the way, no respectable academic believes as you do) have to say about them? I feel where you are coming from, and I had the same views as you do, but I read a lot both in books and on the internet, and now I hold a different view. I'm sorry bro, you're not right, but you're so far off the mark that you're not even wrong, you need to catch up with the discussion, it's left you in the dust. You're like a Ptolo…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:04 AM
1

You need to back your shit up bro. Show me dem sources.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:02 AM
2

It's bizarre to me that we have MRAs that consider masculinity to be something concrete. Your notions of masculinity are completely socially constructed, it's just difficult to say it's not biological. Society has been shaped into an engine that churns out men and women according to these gender roles.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:00 AM
1

Yes you did, you beardless, fanny toothed gumshoe.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:58 AM
2

We have mounting evidence for both men and women that Gender is sociological. Consider the gender roles that men assume, they vary in different cultures. That's basically proof that it's not inherent, or at least that it's not totally inherent. Second, even if it was inherent, it might not be what is most moral, it may not be what we OUGHT to strive for in our human society.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:57 AM
2

It's more complicated than that, it's a science for a reason. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenatal_hormones_and_sexual_orientation
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:54 AM
2

If you consider that perhaps gender is purely sociological, then yes, you can eschew your gender. You could be transgender without any medical treatment. Remember there is a difference between transexual and transgender.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:53 AM
2

This is pretty false. You are sticking to some conservative principles I get that, but people are born malformed, mutated, or whatever all the time. Just because they don't fit into your view? You're just going to say to them, "Sorry, you're brain is broken" I deny you my civility? Have some sympathy I urge you, seek out their point of view. You don't have to take up their flag, just acknowledge that there may be something to it, or some deeper explanation. It's not hard to be compassionate I pr…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:50 AM
1

I like your comments and your video as well!
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:48 AM
12

Not all of the thoughts or concepts produced from Feminist scholarship are wrong. Don't be so simplistic, attempt to evaluate ideas on their own merit. Don't stoop to their fucking level bro.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:47 AM
2

It's very gender-essentialist in a way that assumes masculine and feminine are not socially imposed and that makes it VERY sexist in my opinion. However, I find this sexist by some definitions, however, I'm open that there are differences of mind (probably very small if any at all) between men and women. Though I definitely do not think that there is any way of getting at truth that is essential to either gender.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:58 AM
1

Yeah, I hate to say it but if you feel more comfortable talking to a man or a woman just because of their Gender, that's sexism yo... :( I understand that people have preference, in the moment if you feel that, then go with your gut, but always be skeptical of your own impulses and instincts. We have Reason because our feelings will fail us.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:48 AM
1

This is an excellent writeup.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:33 AM
6

Omg I must see this source.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:17 AM
-1

I'm pretty dissappointed by the downvotes too. Just FYI, there are many here who are feminists, we just tend to not be in the majority.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:45 AM
8

Aren't you glad that you can have this conversation here, frustrating as it may be, such dissent would never be allowed in a feminist forum, you'd have been banned by now ;) Something to think about. Also, I'm enjoying your discussion here. Thanks for coming by, and I hope you stick around. Try to ignore the downvotes. You've made an impression on me for the better.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:43 AM
2

Men being in positions of power does not mean that men have intentionally chosen to keep women out. It's that men believed (and had good reason based on their cultural experiences) to believe that women were not good at it. Now there is more evidence and things are changing, there is no cabal. Patriarchy made sense when there was patrilineal inheritance and literal rule by the father over a household, but that has largely changed, and died away.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:41 AM
2

It's just not a very good concept, it's a terribad model of the way humans actually behave. Cultural descriptions based on memetics are in my opinion much more fruitful than patriarchy. Feminists tend to inherit more from Marxist social dilemmas than from philosophy though. Hence why patriarchy theory is so much more complicated than it needs to be.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:39 AM
3

What is outdated about the rule of thumb?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:52 AM
2

I'd say this is one of the better treatments, actually acknowledging these things is one thing, how are they working on it? Because from what I can tell the most recent moves by prominent organizations have been worsening the view of men by people.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:28 PM
2

I've thought about this too and I think that perhaps we all have different levels of depth of degree to which we are willing to question our beliefs and actions. I do think many people question themselves, but it is not the questions we would like them to ask themselves. I think the single most important question from which all the rest stem are, is there goodness in what I am doing? Is there truth in it? Is there harm to anyone from this?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:23 PM
-3

I actually like this comic, because I can sympathize and I do see the doublespeak and all that. However, reality sucks. Not just for women, but for men too. Whenever you put yourself in the spotlight, it's a hard, harsh place. Especially when people think they will not have deal with the consequences of their actions. People are cruel and we should fight against that, but there is something said for being strong on your own, because if you are looking to cure human cruelty, I have a bridge in Ma…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:16 PM
1

I'm not sure that it has happened more than once. I have definitely read of one case were it did happen.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:17 AM
1

lol, I thought this had the feel of private messages
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:22 PM
1

To the top with ye (I hope)
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:19 PM
10

May I have the source for "studies have shown that a large portion of rapes can be prevented by even a little verbal or physical resistance."?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:16 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aristocrats_%28joke%29 "The Aristocrats" (also known as "The Debonaires" or "The Sophisticates" in some tellings) is an exceptionally transgressive (taboo-defying) dirty joke that has been told by numerous stand-up comedians since the vaudeville era. Over time it has evolved from a clichéd staple of vaudevillian humor into a postmodern anti-joke. Regardless of the build up, the punchline is definitely either an anti-joke, or a bait and switch.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:31 PM
-5

What a brilliant anti-joke :D Thank you for sharing this! For those not familiar with an anti-joke, may I humbly suggest you google the aristocrats joke.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:37 AM
4

Yeah, you need to get that checked out. That doesn't speak of a healthy mind. It's great that you have found what you believe to be a better side in an ongoing public debate, but none of this should affect you that much.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:05 PM
1

I don't think many agree with this narrative, it seems that most believe that Feminism had good motives at first, but has now run amok.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:10 PM
2

Video evidence?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:02 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean, would you explain it a little further?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:44 AM
10

I could write a long discourse on what I dislike about modern feminism, but I don't think that will be as productive as this example. Whenever I come to learn about an ideology or a system of beliefs that represents a challenge to my own way of thinking about things, I question first, what are these people like, has this philosophy produced happy people? Well adjusted people? In feminism, the answer is largely no. The more a person is a feminist, the less pleasant they seem to be. Now I could ch…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:01 AM
2

I still think we should take it down as we have to appear totally perfect and if we don't they will smear us everywhere they can. I don't like it, but they are the majority, they've got the power, we should embrace what we can. EEE - Embrace, Extend, Eradicate
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:45 AM
2

Where did the money come from originally? Loan? I don't know how court settlements work.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:07 AM
1

Alright sweet, play cool and get it done.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:52 AM
1

A lot of other subreddits do raise money though. /r/Atheism and /r/Christianity often do I believe.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:30 PM
-2

I respect your opinion and your attempt at SRS MYTHOS here, but you're better off just not obsessing about them unless they are causing you problems. For the most part they tend to keep to themselves unless you happen to do something they deem offensive, and then they just tend to laugh. Honestly I see MR and SRS as two opposing hyperboles of the same struggle, they have trouble believing in anything not in the Feminist canon and some MR have trouble taking any of the feminist cannon seriously. …
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:59 PM
2

It comes from multiple angles but mostly what feminists would call remnants patriarchical culture. I do think that some vestiges of patriarchy still linger, though the patriarchal apparatus has long lay mostly exposed and opposed by almost all who consider it. Nonetheless I will enumerate all the false beliefs that contribute to the idea that a man cannot be raped. For a long time women have been thought of as less human in terms of faculty and agency, that when committing a crime that they coul…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:12 PM
7

I hope you write to CNN and other news outlets with your story. It's great. Please do :)
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:22 PM
5

I'll have you know I aviate in my fin-rotored machine powered by aged dinosaur guts. AND GOOD DAY TO YOU SIR
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:43 AM
5

You may message me if you like in PM or on here. I'm more than happy to engage in a discussion or a debate if you would like.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:30 AM
2

rofl
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:03 AM
2

No, I am upset that I will never know what I am missing out on.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:40 PM
1

Yes, the worst part is precisely that I will never know.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:39 PM
3

I was circumcised at birth. Learning about this later was extremely traumatic for me. I had led a fairly normal life up until that time. I was depressed for about two years and became suicidal during that time. I underwent therapy that did not help. I felt like I had been raped and mutilated, but that all that society had to say about it was. Oops bro, better luck next time. I simply wanted to be whole again.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:37 PM
8

LOL oh ok, good thing your friend was able to clear that up. Big sample size you've got there
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:24 PM
12

Actually if you look at the research, men who are cut last on average about 30 seconds less, it has to do with the ridge of the glans being exposed and causing the orgasm prematurely, also lessening the buildup.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:06 AM
11

You won't ever know what real sex is supposed to feel like, you lost like 25,000 nerves. Did you not know that?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:36 AM
21

Yes. There are many. I am one of them. No longer pissed off. Was pissed off for a long time. I'm now at peace, but still it gets my blood boiling that it happened to me.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:37 AM
3

That's just a part of it though. Her actions not only got them bad publicity, but has encouraged a culture of tattling, oversensitivity, and intolerance (hilariously) at conferences. I will never be attending Pycon because they are willing under the influence of people like this.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:59 PM
3

wat du fak
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:29 AM
-1

That's so disgusting, we need an option for men to be able to say, I do not want to have children with this person. We shouldn't have to undergo surgery to not be responsible for children that we have no agency in the creation thereof. Consent to sex is not equivalent to consent to 18 years of child support!
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:52 PM
1

There's no way to waive child support? Is this true in all states?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:48 PM
2

I appreciate it. I'm impartial on Ayn Rand, she gets a lot of hate, but until I read her works for myself, I will not judge. I'm a philosophy student at heart <3
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:20 AM
1

Well I'd be interested in whom it is.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:03 AM
2

Also, I can't find a source on this quote either. Which is disturbing. I found a book that quotes it indirectly, but does not include a source either.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:35 AM
1

Quote source?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:32 AM
2

What the fuck... I would sue the shit out of her. Like right now. Someone puts something like that out there with your name on it, you could be killed, dox, life ruined, Jesus Christ dude!
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:47 AM
0

Link?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:16 AM
1

Yes!!
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:58 AM
5

Thank you for writing here. If you really want to make a difference, get a pen and a piece of paper, or MS word or whatever, write/type a letter and sign it, address it manually stamp and everything and send it in, or hand deliver it yourself to someone in power, everyone in power who might read it. I wish to God I was in a position to do so but I am not, if you are in a position, you can make the world better by doing this, and as a woman, you will not be attacked in the same way that a man wil…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:47 AM
2

I LOVE THIS THREAD...SO MUCH
/r/MensRights05/03/13 07:12 AM
1

All of you need to get the W. Kaufmann edition, it's the best and probably my favorite book next to the Summa Theologica.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 11:40 PM
1

preceded by...Battle not with monsters, lest ye become one, and know that when you stare into the...
/r/MensRights04/03/13 11:38 PM
3

I'm in agreement that ethical wrong must include intent. If you accidentally kill someone because you are stupid it does not require the same reform as if you intentionally and maliciously murder someone.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:35 AM
2

Interesting perspective. Thank you
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:18 PM
6

Yeah, and personally as a programmer, I don't want there to be creative standards in video games, I like the current underpinnings of the character design, sexist as they may be, whatever! It's a fantasy that I enjoy for male, female, or otherwise.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:16 PM
1

BEENNEED
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:15 PM
2

Clearly the slingshotted birds represents forced seminal intercourse upon the pigs who represent innocent and continually raped women, only wanting to eat the bird's eggs and thereby consummate their femininity. -Simone de Beauvoir
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:13 PM
-2

Than*
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:11 PM
0

Yeah but his nipples aren't highlighted, his dick is non-existent, the shoulders and chest are emphasized so yes on that however his lower body is well covered, I'd say you can find him sexualized sure, but when I look at him, I just think he looks cool. Same thing with Ivy, I never really found her to be like all that sexual (I was a gymnast for like 7 years) so women scantily clad doing all manner of bouncing and things is a daily thing, if you can't deal you get out. I can deal, and frankly I…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:09 PM
2

Transabled otherkin
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:00 PM
1

I don't think they actually believe that all Men are rapist though, that's obviously mudslinging to delegitimize the MR movement.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:42 AM
2

She didn't want to have sex and she told him so. While people do change their minds, ultimately, that was a NO. He should have respected it. She shouldn't have to say NO again. This really doesn't have anything to do with Men's rights unless you believe that we should be allowed to ignore an explicit spoken "I don't want to have sex".
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:12 AM
1

I haven't seen much of this lately. Do you have examples?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:53 PM
3

No need to censor him because of a few bad things. We should be cautious about that behavior. We can still praise the good and point out the flaws with the bad in his stuff.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:19 PM
-4

Rape culture is real. And Patriarchy was a valid idea that described society very well for a while, and it still has effects today even though legally it has been dismantled
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:59 AM
3

I understand your thinking, but there is legitimate research that supports the hypothesis that the mind can be one gender while the body is another. Take a look at the transgender wikipedia page. Also, these people tend to suffer a lot for doing this, it's not necessarily an easy choice. Also, as long as it is not infringing upon the rights of other people, I'm all for letting adults do whatever they want with their body. I think this is a pretty good policy.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:23 AM
0

Don't know who downvoted you, but there is no citation in the article that explains that part either, and the attribution is quite vague also. Seems to be a case of strawfeminists.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:11 AM
4

My qualms are that it's an obvious and egregious violation of human rights! Have you actually looked into what is lost? Have you looked at the ethical arguments put forward by the philosophers? Do you even fucking logic?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:54 AM
4

Do you assume that all men only enjoy the orgasm part of sex? I enjoy everything in around and leading up to it. Perhaps a little extra perspective is in order?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:41 AM
1

Why do you think they want to have been circumcised at birth rather than at the time of their own choosing?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:14 AM
0

Is it possible you don't want to think about what you maybe lost?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:11 AM
1

Huh, which is weird because on average uncut men last longer. See the wikipedia page for information on this.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:08 AM
3

Does it not bother you in the least that human prejudice and tradition subverted millions of years of evolution? Evolution that has produced the wonders all this world over and the one that is spoken most highly of, that of sexual intercourse and its complementary pleasure have been denied to you in their most natural form? That TRULY doesn't bother you? Not in the slightest bit?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:07 AM
10

Doesn't matter. Regardless, we should err against the side of permanent mutilation that kills off tens of thousands of nerve endings.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:45 PM
1

It's probably the idea that since there is an inequality perceived by one then all sex is coerced and therefore rape. It's a very radical idea. One could argue that a man's lack of self-determination with respect to reproduction puts him at a power disadvantage to all women and therefore any moral woman should refuse to have sex with him as it would be an abuse of power. Not that she would abuse it, but that no person should be in such a position of power with someone they are having sex with. I…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:55 AM
2

Consent or Intent for that matter
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:53 AM
2

Nice, please keep it to self post unless you are linking to an article.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:45 AM
1

That should really be banned. I'm sure nobody denies that all humans are pretty rotten most of the time haha
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:26 AM
1

WBB?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:14 AM
1

Well there are many who contend that men do suffer quietly in many areas. I'm not sure that they are well represented, I think everyone just assumes that we have got it together, and perhaps this is the result of socialization, many feminists contend that this is patriarchy, but I'm much more content to say that men are socialized to suffer quietly, I don't think that there needs to be a question of "Quo bono?" People do many things that do not benefit them. However I'll admit that in this case,…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:45 AM
1

Absolutely, women are judged much more harshly for not having children, after all, it's their one 'real' purpose... /killme
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:26 PM
-1

This looks like the kind of thing we should oppose, it should include both genders or there should be two programs each accepting of male and female.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:25 PM
1

Absolutely not, at the end of the day, MR is simply about overt legal sexism. Please, don't use a few idiots as exemplars for the whole movement. I comment as much as I can, but I only have so much time.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:32 AM
1

Yeah, I don't think this is a good idea, our movement should be based on love not revenge.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:04 AM
1

Really?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:25 PM
-1

MGTOW garbage. Move along
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:27 AM
10

If they EXPECT me to buy DLC for major storyline points. Fuck that
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:55 PM
3

For like no goddamned reason!
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:00 PM
0

Left 4 Dead is pretty fantastic if you ask me :). The Walking Dead game is pretty atrocious but has the burden of needing a believable story that relates to a mostly still-sexist audience so I'm sympathetic.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:51 PM
1

Are you being sarcastic, because not all men build muscle like that. Furthermore, many men have trouble building muscle at all. Then throw in jawline, skin color, and hair. Also there are many women that could look like the first, and many men who could look like the second, it's just not a substantial portion of humanity.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:50 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:05 AM
1

Yes discrimination based upon trends without looking at the individual is BAD! If I make decision about someone based upon facts of the INDIVIDUAL then no, that's just discernment and prudence. However, if I make a decision about someone else based not on specific knowledge of the individual, but rather upon inferred 'knowledge' based upon trends, even when well established, then I am a bigot. Politically I believe this to be the correct analysis. That does not mean it is from a personal ethic t…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:24 AM
1

Do you have references? I'm not familiar with this?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:18 AM
6

What does the term mean to gamers?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:33 PM
0

Absolutely not. We do not support the nonconsentual and permanent mutilation of boys for the sake of tradition.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:24 PM
9

I'm all for shedding all labels. :) Welcome to the more truthful, and ambiguous world.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:19 AM
6

Well, in general, the weak need defending. There are weak men and women, and others who don't identify as either. The biggest issue for men is getting recognition that men have issues. You can read about these issues on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:25 PM
3

Sidebar.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:24 PM
3

Well good luck changing a term that's been around for a hundred years.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:07 AM
3

What were you arguing about and was your argument?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:07 AM
8

Common ground with some Feminists is possible. It simply is, feminism isn't black and white, and neither is MR. People are all many shades of grey between and we should acknowledge that and attempt to build solidarity, not further a divide. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love." -MLK Jr.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:20 AM
6

To the top with you!
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:40 AM
3

GETOUT
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:38 AM
12

I'm pretty horrified that you've been downvoted here. Seriously guys look it up, one of the primary external indicators that a woman is a woman is her breasts. It's selfish to consider yourself more affected. I understand it might have been a joke but woah
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:43 AM
1

You should say "I wish to be better educated"
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:46 AM
4

Fantastic!
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:45 AM
1

Feminists tend to be against using 'girl' so I can see that this might rile some of them up, personally I'm not against it, but we should be building rapport with the feminists who do agree with us, and there are a lot of them, we just don't see them because they aren't kicking and screaming against us and trying to get us labeled as a hate group.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:59 PM
3

I agree with you, I think it was true for women before feminism
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:54 PM
1

Where's the link to what you are referencing? You should add it to your post.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:02 AM
6

I'm ok with whoever owns an organization making whatever rules they please.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:56 AM
7

I disagree with much of what you say, but you seem reasonable and amenable to discussion and debate and thus I will upvote you, I hope others will do the same and I urge them to it.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:24 AM
1

That is true for about 30-40 years depending on how good their game is.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:08 AM
1

If you're looking for real discussion, you'll want to say there are more than just two sides of consideration: just look at the wikipedia page for transgender. There are MTF and FTM trans people that are neglected by a dualistic gender dichotomy, not to mention genderqueer, androgynes, and people who identify as other things that I can't remember off of the top of my head.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:51 AM
11

Stop advertising here. Reporting.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:43 AM
9

/r/TeachMeToBeOffended
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:08 PM
1

Are you speaking ironically? Because assault means to cause a victim to apprehend violence. Assault is the communication of a threat of violence either imminent but possibly conditional depending upon the actions of the victim - as with robbery.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:02 PM
1

Honestly, I don't think it helps to vent about women, it only is going to make us more like feminism if we take ques from them.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:13 AM
9

Isn't only a man's job
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:50 AM
0

This also appears in a Richard Dawkins' book, A Devil's Chaplain. It's very lovely. If you are interested in this sort of debunking, I highly recommend: The Demon Haunted World.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:11 PM
0

Hear Hear. Let's ignore everything in a fit of rage so we can give people unrealistic advice that will probably do more harm than good.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:51 PM
2

Have you asked them why it wasn't possible? You've been upvoted highly, but I'm not sure why. This doesn't prove sexual discrimination and without all the facts from the other side, it's really easy to want to believe you. And I feel for you I really do, we and probably you too - we don't have all the facts, don't fall into the behavior that at the first sign of trouble, that gender is the cause, this is one of the attitudes we see in a radfems all the time. When your only tool is a hammer, ever…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:38 PM
1

I was in the same boat as you are now, and I'm not going to tell you that you shouldn't feel that way. I hope that perhaps this can give you some perspective. Initially when I found out, I was consumed with hate, suicidal, depressed, I lashed out at everyone, "this was my one life!" How dare they not respect my bodily integrity, how could they not know? Well, they trusted doctors. Doctors who are human and who are not immune to superstition, who are not immune to traditions. We of course wish th…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:03 PM
-7

This has nothing to do with Men's Rights. Discuss priority issues somewhere else.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:11 AM
1

Libel and Slander however, are not.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:40 PM
4

One should be for the right to that speech, but just because we must allow for it does not mean we must remain silent on what a person should act like. Photographing someone without their consent and linking it on the internet is ungentlemanly and we should make it clear that such behavior is frowned upon.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:39 PM
1

No need to yes....Let's all get sun dresses and parasols!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:56 PM
2

You can feel this way legitimately without contesting the legitimacy of the feelings of these men. When I found out, I was horribly distraught, suicidal, and became depressed for two years. I didn't want to be a victim, I pushed everyone away and would have done anything to 'fix myself'. I felt broken apart, sometimes I still do. Hardly anyone knows about my pain and I just want to move on. All I can tell you is, I want circumcision to be over for the world, and for myself, I want to stop explai…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:47 AM
2

This is a top notch article. Too difficult for me to read all the way though. I am one of the hurt.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:44 AM
1

Why unfortunately?
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:36 PM
1

I don't think it would have been cost effective in this case...That's just me.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:35 AM
1

What was the population size of your jurisdiction?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:59 PM
9

Doesn't matter. We are better than this.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:10 PM
6

Backstory please?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:46 PM
39

We've got to work on our language if we want to be taken seriously. Don't stoop to stupid insults, attack their ideas. Not the people expressing them.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:43 PM
1

This is from 2006. Is this still relevant?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:43 PM
1

You were downvoted but you are absolutely right. People are selfish petty creatures and will use whatever means they can to be happy, successful, or whatever they desire. It's considered Machiavellian to view people this way, but it's pretty much exactly how people act.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:24 AM
1

Do you see them doing anything about it?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:14 AM
2

Sources? I'm not disagreeing, I've just not noticed this myself.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:54 PM
5

Stick to the issues, all these do is further a divide. We need to bring genders together for equality, not push them apart.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:19 PM
1

Excuse me?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 01:16 PM
2

You misunderstood me. I meant: how do YOU know you have it?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:09 AM
2

Libertarian, Capitalist with Antitrust and Antimonopoly Sentiments
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:49 AM
2

If you don't have serious problems like that, how do you know you have it as opposed to hypochondria?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:05 AM
2

I'm against it even as an option. There is too much possibility for corruption and pressure.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:04 AM
2

There was a follow up story you missed. Please look into it, I'm hitting the hay so I don't have time tonight.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:02 AM
2

Link?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:45 AM
2

Um, no it's not a joke. Have you been to SRSD?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:43 AM
1

<3
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:53 AM
2

I'm not sure how this is possible at all.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:52 AM
2

You should leave as soon as possible. I'm not kidding. Tell her that you are leaving because she hit you.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 03:31 PM
3

“Truly it is a very natural and ordinary thing to desire to acquire, and always, when men do it who can, they will be praised or not blamed; but when they cannot, and wish to do it anyway, here lie the error and the blame.” -Niccolo Machiavelli
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:48 PM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:11 PM
1

I'm interested in this discussion as well. Is there anyway to have reddit bump me when someone replies to someone else's comment that I'm interested in?
/r/MensRights04/06/12 05:19 PM
15

Your wording and approach seems racist. I didn't look at your sources but you could have written that better. Providing more explanations and clarifications to avoid racism would be nice but yes MR already is being flagged as every bad thing out there because it is a threat. You must be better than those you oppose by much to overcome the institutional advantage that we are fighting against.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 01:51 PM
1

If you want to preserve good feelings then by all means your metric seems fine. However we cannot architect our behavior such that we tiptoe at all times attempting to avoid offending anybody, we simply can't do it. So we should act boldly where we must and apologize if necessary, those who don't understand this have obviously not themselves tried to never offend anybody. It's an untenable position and if urged by your enemies, it's obvious they are posturing you for weakness.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:59 PM
1

She references "A Modest Proposal" in the video description by Jonathan Swift which is satire.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter