TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

amisamiamiam Archive

View 8 posts and 103 comments by amisamiamiam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

Agreed, just as many female predators as male IMO. OP what you're describing is narcissism, not necessarily all females. Triangulation or releasing the flying monkeys is part of that package. Pro tip, if they make duck face on their social media, move on!
/r/MensRights14/05/26 10:49 PM
26

Agree, they're not more empathic. Makes me wonder if the current structure we have with women being the "caregivers" and the men being the "providers" was just so narcissistic women could have more control, more say and gaslight men into being a meal ticket.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 07:51 PM
1

Skipping the obvious southern jokes here, and I think you'd have to be nuts to have a child after 40...still. Come on. What the actually hell?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:16 AM
13

I think people who don't eat peanut butter because they have allergies should be called allergists. You're either a normal person or an allergists.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 06:58 PM
3

No worries though, all the good Scandinavians mass immigrated to the US about 100 years ago. Dummies got left behind.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:08 PM
2

no worries, it didn't show up when I posted the link
/r/MensRights19/08/19 05:15 AM
8

You are awesome. It may get deleted in those subs but being honest isn't against the rules here. As an aside, the biggest problem with the court system is that there is clear bias and they admit in their own by-laws that they have zero interest in the children and they also get kick backs from the Federal Government for every dollar collected. Until the motivation changes non-custodials are and will be screwed.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:21 PM
7

Johnny Depp should have known not to fall for the classic "Lemon Tree". I know what she did was completely, unabashedly wrong, evil and horrific, but come on, Johnny. We could see that from a mile away. I'll leave this here for the young whipper snappers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f97-E3Y2G4Q
/r/MensRights14/03/19 07:03 PM
8

r/failedsocialism
/r/MensRights08/02/19 10:53 PM
25

The problem with the Family Law Court is that they are a non-interested 3rd party. They get .60 cents for every dollar collected in the form of a grant from the Federal Government. And since they are a government body, they misuse their own power to reach the aim of collecting that money irregardless of the children. It's wrong, it's illegal and somebody oughta do something about it. This truly has nothing to do with being female or male. It's the children that get screwed when the government bl…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:39 PM
1

The news on the street is that Grimes is out.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 01:36 AM
22

Divorce court is a mudslinging fest and she slung mud first. That's the sad truth. Once those allegations are made they chase you for years, either professionally or mentally. Unfounded? Sorry guilty until proven dead. They never go away. She's a little princess who confuses being unhappy and having a terrible marriage with abuse. Poor thing.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 01:35 AM
1

From the Guardian article: "'It's sad that what 5,000 women, non-binaries and transgender experienced as a life-changing festival, made a few cis-men lose it completely. "
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:30 AM
8

This is why we can’t have nice things.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:24 AM
0

en·act /enˈakt,inˈakt/Submit verb 2. act out (a role or play) on stage. synonyms: act out, act, perform, appear in, stage, mount, put on, present, example: "the attorneys enacted the law"
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:34 AM
1

Except that most mediators are...gulp, attorneys.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:22 AM
26

Doing the math he will be broke in about 15 years.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:11 AM
1

Then use a mediator. Use your best judgment about “there oughta be a law” because you’re wasting your time.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:04 AM
-5

They are merely providing a service. You don’t like your spouses attorney? Get a better attorney.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:00 AM
–

I’m not missing it all. I’ve lived it. You can be anti establishment all you want but your argument is obtuse.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:58 PM
-3

What? So an attorney is guilty for your marriage failing?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:40 PM
–

Sorry but your comment is misguided. Judges and lawyers only enact legislation, they don’t make it. The child support laws as they stand are run by the Federal Gov and they are the ones that give the states matching funds for every dollar collected. .60 of every dollar. States are highly motivated to collect.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:00 PM
5

Eh....maybe. Hopefully courts are starting to shift irregardless of job status.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:45 PM
3

I’ll never forget how blue his eyes were...
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:39 AM
-1

Ha, you only think so. Race car drivers cannot get on the track to race without experience. Having someone wish them "good luck" before a race is complimentary and a kind sentiment, therefore anyone wishing them luck does not mean they are disregarding their skill and practice and just hoping they win in spite of all their training. You sir are travelling down a rabbit hole that makes no difference in the larger scheme of things and are quite frankly wasting your time pursuing it. #getalife #was…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:12 PM
1

They’re complimentary idioms. Seriously am I talking to a Fortnite addict? #stayinschool
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:33 AM
-9

You are clearly a hard left winger, probably female trying to infiltrate this sub with your drivel. "Every woman has a loaded gun." Get.a.grip
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:55 PM
1

Without going into personal details, no I can't see 26 years into the future, but can see 22 years into the past having gone through something similar. Here's what I tell everyone, lawyer up, make your kids a priority, invest in yourself, and with any luck you'll find the right one. GENERALLY SPEAKING. Life isn't worth living without developing meaningful relationships with people.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:21 PM
2

r/nofap you're welcome
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:51 PM
21

Nobody stands to gain from you unless you enter into the the Family Law Court system in the USA.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:50 PM
1

"Nope, better to stay single." While I respect your opinion in that you have a right to express it, men should not hunker down and live in fear of fulfilling relationships with women, even long term. The key is personal development and experience in choosing someone wisely.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:48 PM
1

OK the title "Two Elderly Gentlemen" are 49 and 50...is that really elderly?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:13 PM
4

Uma Thurman’s acting is as good as Scarlett Johansson. Ethan is waaaaaay better.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:35 PM
13

She needs alimony to continue the power mythos. By continued punishment she becomes alpha. The reality is that she ensures she is a dependent. Yeah Uma I’m speaking to you.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:33 PM
7

They sure fucked up by hiring that all-feminist team Kinda like the US college system is now?
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:55 AM
3

In the US I believe for every dollar collected in support, the fed does a reciprocal grant to the tune of .60 cents per dollar to allow the State to use it for whatever the hell they want. Of course the judge is going to award itself (cough cough) I mean the mother more money. This guy should refocus on visitation and screw working overtime. It's an unwinnable game unless you are smart about it.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:13 PM
6

Good for him for doing this. If anything it will ease his conscious. Fact of the matter is, the only way he is going to matter is if he ponies up big bucks for support AND gets decent visitation and is consistent in his visits. Custodial parents often abuse by innuendo and rumor if not directly. This sort of mind-screw can damage even the most stellar of non-custodials for decades.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:10 PM
17

Ask Morgan Freeman
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:11 PM
6

Hmm howbout mandamning or manslamming?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:58 AM
4

edited, but it was so bleh to read, what could one do?
/r/MarriedRedPill18/12/17 04:05 AM
6

Again, you're confusing infatuation with love, and considering your prior post, obviously an attention whore. You don't like "Aunt Mabel" because you're not worthy of her love and are a walking liar. Enjoy the abyss. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23gRI_j5InA
/r/MarriedRedPill18/12/17 03:32 AM
2

I'm going with invigorating with a splash of optimism.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:26 PM
8

Hyperbole: noun, "In 2017 Elon Musk announced his plans to create the hyperbole, a bole that would keep Frosted Flakes crunchy at 500mph."
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:15 AM
8

Best thing anyone can do is not fall for this word salad. Please ignore her.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:03 AM
–

But, but, but! She's a female, the moral high ground, the nurturer, the gentler part of our species. I mean there's gotta be a good reason for what she did right? Maybe it was PMS, you know how that can ruin a girls day. /s
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:41 PM
–

We don't need your help if that's your attitude. Fair, balanced, but not militant. Piss off.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:13 PM
4

When men's rights gets to this level of minutiae, we begin to start losing credibility. Fact is, most women in 3rd world countries do haul water.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:59 PM
1

http://madhattermagicshop.com/magicshop/images/model23B.jpg
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:58 AM
0

Yes I know but I don't believe he is talking about shares of that sort. We have no list of what assets were divided and /u/EricAllonde makes the presumption that there were shares to have and that she took a cash payout based on his interpretation.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:46 AM
-1

http://cdnll.touchofclass.com/images/xxl/Z982-001.jpg
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:43 AM
-1

Quote the part about the company being listed before settlement and there being actual shares to have. Might want to reread the article.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:27 AM
-2

Wow thanks Mom! I'll add condescending and mix it with a twist of sarcasm. Enjoy!
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:24 AM
-1

How you got all that from the article is beyond me. You should go into writing fiction.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:22 AM
1

Wait, you're saying you are internalizing nothing, and then in the second sentence you say you are empathizing. What is empathizing but internalizing the problems of others. I'd like to invite you to leave the discussion u/orscorper
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:20 AM
-1

Why are you internalizing their problem? The takeaway here, and I've maintained that if he hadn't been playing around with his assets 2 weeks before the divorce was finalized, we wouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:31 AM
1

haha! Awesome
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:20 PM
1

ps this is one of the hugest circle jerk threads I've seen btw. What I said was valuable whether any choose to view it that way. I'm completed divested in these idiots lives, clownvotes aka down votes are for babies.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:44 PM
2

Frankie Says RELAX.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:41 PM
-1

Hey, I hear you! I'm just saying from a lawyer's point of view, what you said means diddly.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:41 PM
–

How you decide to interpret my comment, (which I thought was more along the lines of don't take this so seriously) is ok by me. Telling me to fuck off is just juvenile and I expect you're the type that would no disclose funds either. It's a stupid move on his part. Please troll elsewhere, you're just being silly.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:13 PM
-19

That's not the point at all. Again, this is their eco-system and not yours.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:11 PM
–

It's nothing of the sort. No offense, not trying to be dickish but as stated below he made the mistake of doing this weeks (if not months) before finalization on disputed assets. He should have disclosed this information. Building a business takes work, luck, sweat, tears, and she was with him for 35 years and he created a lotto ticket that purposefully made it so she couldn't reap the rewards.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:33 PM
–

on or before 16 April 2015, he made enquiries as to whether or not to undertake the public listing of company - known as an Initial Public Offering (IPO). "But he and other parties actually "determined to take the initial steps to the making of an IPO" on May 1, 2015. As mentioned previously, the former couple's property dispute was finalised April 27, 2015. " He was working with disputed assets before the finalization of the divorce and there is a clause in most property disputes that you are c…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:30 PM
–

If this was a paltry 6 years of marriage during a career development time, I can see this being a load of bs. But the fact that they were together for 35 years I think she has a legitimate claim. Please don't internalize how you would survive on less money, this is not relative to your station in life. Its their mini-eco system where big bucks are the norm, and they don't have to be charitable and humble, it's business.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:54 PM
–

The presumption is that she helped him throughout his career, and by so doing, has a legitimate claim to his money by playing that role. Remember the woman who tried to hide her lotto winnings before she divorced her husband? Yeah the judge sided on the husband's side and she lost most of it if I recall correctly. Really this is the same with the twist that she actually helped him earn it.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:53 PM
17

Your local DSHS specifically Office of Child Support Payments is a CASH COW for your State Government. (title IV fund from the Fed, in other words, the Fed matches payments, so if you ex gets $50 so does the state) They'll continue to pull this sort of shit until men organize and demand that biases in the Family Law Court be examined for the alienating, denegrating mass of horse shit that they are.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:25 AM
4

She's screwed. Adoption agencies always do personality tests, and do all sorts of suitability tests for adoption. He has a mountain of evidence. That was just a dumb move on her part and its going to be very easy to disprove in court. BTDT
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:20 PM
3

And I'm sorry OP but you sound like a real piece of work. Getting BJ's on the side, which means sex on the side. No wonder she's asking for a divorce. And, "Sea of Pussy" classic. If you saw your wife as a piece of meat, good for her. Red pill or no you sound like all you can think about is yourself. The yellow flags were you my friend, not her.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/05/16 07:53 PM
1

Don't know why OP decided to delete this shit post but I'll post it here: All right guys here's an update. I posted a few months ago the ultimate shit test: my wife filing for divorce after (1) me awakening about 15 months ago and (2) reaching some kind of botched main event in late December when I told her fuck me or I'll get a GF. She chose to get an atty, go formal and go nuclear. Great. The month of March has been the most shitty part of my adult life. She moved out, took kids with her unfor…
/r/MarriedRedPill15/05/16 07:51 PM
–

And it could be argued that you're just naive.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:15 PM
–

"Consensual sex with a 15 year old should not be illegal." What, you a Catholic priest or something? Any adult in a position of power/teaching/caregiving etc should not EVER have sex with someone in their care. Fuck you u/AlwaysABride
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:40 AM
2

I'm a little at loss to describe the sheer stupidity of the falling down observation. I think that's a sign of not ever having kids. If you fall down over 5 and you're not a special needs child then get up and suck it up buttercup!
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:28 PM
3

I think she wants the best of both worlds. Since when does any political candidate require that their opponent "be nice" to them? That makes no sense. I want political opponents to crush one another based on past performance, end.of.story. If she measures up she'll be able to stand up to scrutiny. If not well...see ya! She was the Secretary of State and an attorney for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:24 PM
7

I think /u/Scurvemuch makes an assumption that OP is married to a tranny.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/03/16 01:10 AM
5

Do you really pay enough taxes to make the claim that what you input means everyone who has a student loan owes you? What's next, the media labeling them as "deadbeat students"?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:12 AM
6

I know, its not "mensrights" BUT listen, they've been doing this to men in child support cases all over the country and nobody cares. I get it, there are deadbeats but when the courts win Fed money for collecting on child support you should have figured that there was going to be more usury collection via firearms and jailtime in other areas. It was just a matter of time.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:18 PM
9

Who is the ass clown that is downvoting this?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:55 PM
6

In today's age, maybe its a good thing I did that! ;)
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:42 AM
–

The sanitation argument is ridiculous. Think about the yellow goo that continually comes out of a female vagina. "Self-cleaning organ" is what it is called by many. But if men have anything but pee and semen come out of their penis its unclean? WTF? When talking to the midwives who helped us out they were adamantly against circumcision because it removes many of the sensitive areas of the penis. Sure the drive is still there in a circumcised male as they get older, but the sensitivity is lost. T…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:13 AM
–

or circumcision period.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:16 AM
1

"She was a person of low quality" This is a fake post...come on nobody talks like this. And a 70 year old using acronyms like LTR? FAKE.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/11/15 07:05 AM
2

And you've completely missed the point. Next...
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:12 AM
1

It just flows off the tongue with such self-importance...hard to resist irregardless.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:03 AM
11

AAAARRRGGG I did it again! thx
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:25 AM
126

What everyone is forgetting is that its really not an issue of men vs women's rights, its an issue of State rights to collect money. The State gets funds from the Fed for going after fathers, regardless. Until you can take that out of the equation we are going to continue to hear stories about fathers who didn't know, etc etc.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:14 AM
–

Family law courts don't work that way. You're guilty until proven innocent, end of story. The reason is because they want to protect the children first and screw your rights until you've proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:58 PM
7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ-w_IKGRFM Relevant, kinda. Actually the thing is, when you enter into an adversarial situation, which is what divorce is...you go from being a normal person to being in a battle. The person who slings the most mud usually wins by default. Reason being, its terribly difficult to keep refuting false allegations, however its super important to keep going if you find yourself in this situation. Lawyers have no souls IMO.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:56 PM
2

I think the proper English phraseology is: A dodgy arsehole, a wanker, a tosser, a manky and lazy sod who part times as a mingebag.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:22 PM
7

Not legal either. Its a usury court. Money raised by these courts gets matched by Federal money. The State's Prosecuting Attorney raises $1000 for the non-custodial parent? The Fed gives the Shtate $1000 matching funds. Its meter maids on steroids. It separates parents from children. Its a crime against humanity.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 11:40 AM
–

What a stupid statement. Say what you will about success, it has nothing to do with modifying a perfectly healthy body of a baby. Its archaic, based on ridiculous Judaic laws and a testament to the biases of a vain culture. If your child wants to be modified, give them that right and let them decide when they are 18... Don't force it upon them without their consent.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:53 PM
1

Why stop there? Let's remove the tongue altogether.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:53 PM
12

What's next, the banning of the word, "Bro" because its too masculine and is connotative a relationship that isn't gay?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:47 PM
2

good catch, edited brother
/r/MensRights09/07/14 11:58 PM
–

Here's the thing...penises have plenty of identifiable marks, veins, etc. there is no reason a penis need to be erect. How humiliating! This to me sounds like someone's papa is well connected and wants to teach this here boy a lesson, something mighty fierce.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:05 PM
–

It's called the "Sacred V" and it is incapable of doing harm. How dare you good sir call it a vah...vah...vaaaahhh, oh my...can't even say it!
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:52 PM
3

Wow you really read into things don't you? I said shit happens, that's all. My point was to take out the connotations that sex determines anything.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:43 AM
–

oh the stories of woe I could spin for ye on that yarn.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:29 PM
–

Men and women cheat. No "because it just happens". Shit happens.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:29 PM
–

Condensed version: Socialism
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:14 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised is this post is a little psyop or just someone who is incredibly stupid posting to get a flame war going. This meme does nothing for Men's rights nor womens.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:37 PM
4

It was and is Popecentric.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:24 PM
52

Female sexuality is not the same as male sexuality. Male sexuality is inherently bad. :/
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:23 PM
24

You forgot one step: Take the kids, run off, then blame the dad and don't let him see the kids, then hire an attorney and make false claims of abuse. Yep, dad's fault.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter