TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

andlight91 Archive

View 1 posts and 93 comments by andlight91 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Questionandlight91/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You do realize that Men can have multiple orgasms right? Cumming is not the same as Orgasming.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:51 PM
1

The biggest brain around.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:32 AM
1

Abortion != child murder.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:55 PM
-4

Dude take off the tinfoil hat for a sec and think about what you are saying.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:10 PM
-6

R/conspiracy is over there man.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:49 PM
3

Or the heteronormative aspects of it. What if the kid is gay or trans?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 03:10 PM
4

Cause you know everything else he supports means nothing: The Dismantling of too big to fail banks The legalization of marijuana the continued support of planned parenthood further money spent towards scientific research (particularly Nasa) Getting money out of politics Higher minimum wages CLIMATE CHANGE Health insurance for everyone further background checks for weapons stopping war raising the taxes on the top 1% and distributing that to the lowest percent But you know he supports one thing t…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:17 PM
2

Even if he and Hilary are going to end up causing an economic clusterfuck huh?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:11 PM
1

did Fox tell you that?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:20 PM
0

You don't need to change people. You need to take a stance and stick with it. There are nations without a standing military. Why does a single nation need a military if something like NATO could exist in the UN. If you must insist on a military. A global volunteer military composed of all nations would be the best option.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:45 PM
-1

The other issue lies in greed. People are greedy, even when they have everything they could ask for and more. They want more and more and more. This just leads to a constant cycle of consumption, to the point where necessary resources will be scant. Instead of adapting, people just want to continue consuming.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:03 PM
0

The thing is, we live in a modern society. A society with incredible communication capabilities. Why is there a purpose for war if we have these sorts of capabilities. War doesn't change anything. How many wars have been fought, in those wars how many people have died. How many of those wars could've been avoided by talking, a court, etc. Blind nationalism is a horrible ideal of a past age, and should be kept in the past. All war does is show us that people ignore history.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:42 PM
1

Im saying its probable. The us is gearing up for 30 years of war, and has been for a long time. There will doubtless be serious attacks in america. Chemical - possibly even nuclear. What.....
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:34 PM
1

and who is this mysterious enemy again?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:31 PM
7

War of 1812 was a homefront war, Spanish-American was home front. No MODERN war has been fought on american soil.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:24 PM
0

no, I wouldn't. I don't believe war is the best way to solve a problem. If people sat down, stopped being greedy, and agreed to work together to fix the problems in the world then war isn't necessary. War. War never changes.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:23 PM
1

That's not a necessity though. You don't HAVE to trim your beard. A woman doesn't have a choice in the matter of having blood and fluids seep from their vaginas once a month.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:01 PM
-15

Or you know Reuters, New Yorker, WSJ.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:35 PM
-46

Really foxnews? That's the state of this subreddit. Fox News. Good job getting rid of that far right conservative stigma.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:14 PM
1

And prohibit Atheists and Gay/Transexual men from joining.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:01 PM
0

Because those are also private organizations. All I'm saying is that the US is the only country that isn't coed
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:28 AM
1

I hope all of you claiming they shouldn't change know that the in every other part of the world, Scouting is co-Ed including England. Which by the way is where Scouting was invented.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:28 PM
4

You clearly left out the part where he is spending life in jail for molesting a kid....
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:57 PM
9

So a group went out of their way to get statistics, and find studies about this figure, yet still the Most vocal people in this subreddit still piss on it....EVEN THOUGH IT'S ABOUT MEN. Do you not see the problem with this. This is why no one takes the MRM seriously, you guys at the top are sitting around pissing over a charity that is literally doing ACTIVISM FOR MEN.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:38 PM
7

/r/menkampf just rake in that karma. On another note fuck her.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:12 PM
4

You're being way to aggressive for this argument. All I was saying was that for the study to ACTUALLY hold water they need to use variables that are the same.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:25 PM
3

This caveat is VERY important. The study by itself is not entirely accurate, and if anything is trying to lead the conversation in a way they want it too. To make this study actually accurate you need all rookies fresh out of bootcamp.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:43 PM
2

every single politician lies, or if they don't they are certifiably insane (e.g. Donald Trump). The fact remains that the good he is pushing for far outweighs anything negative he is saying for the sole purpose of getting votes. He would not be able to have the political steam his campaign does if it wasn't for trying to get the "womyn vote"
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:52 PM
1

Because both of those sources are run by the Indian government, which is primarily made up of very conservative men who feel that a women's place is to stay silent in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 12:20 PM
0

Isn't it ridiculous that in a forum that is supposed to promote equality, the people who point out how horrible it is for women in India get downvoted to oblivion while those who are giving false statistics that are heavily biased get upvoted.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:31 PM
1

both of those sources are incredibly biased.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:19 PM
-4

I wasn't saying justice should be denied to innocent folks, what I said was that this would be abused by people who actually did rape a woman, got off scott clean, and then now can sue the woman that accused them.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:37 PM
-6

I have friends from India who would tell you a much different story.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:57 PM
-1

The article is about India though, which is why I commented the way I did.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:46 PM
-7

But as usual we have this article being posted with zero context.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:38 PM
-11

9/10 was an exaggeration to make a point. India has a huge problem with rape and mistreatment of women. That's what I was trying to get across
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:34 PM
-4

In India, where if a women says she was raped (which 9 times out of ten she actually was) the man will say she is a lying whore and so now on top of having to deal with being raped has to pay a settlement.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:20 PM
0

yeah, if this was the US or other first world countries it would be a big step forward. However india has such a rampant rape problem to begin with, that this is just horrible. We should not be celebrating this, if anything we as MRA's should be decrying this, and decrying the treatment of women in India as a whole.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:19 PM
1

see this is what I feel is a major problem with the MRM (as an egalitarian MRA), you are picking one singular aspect of this man's campaign as a character assassination. The people who are critical of Bernie for this one point (here anyway), are ignoring every single one of his other stances, most of which are greatly beneficial to the majority of americans. He wants to abolish the selective service requirement, legalize marijuana, hold wall street and big banks accountable for their crimes. He …
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:05 PM
-5

shhhh don't break the republican circle jerk.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:56 PM
6

this isn't really a good thing in India.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:52 PM
0

Really....did you really just compare socialism to fascism. If anything the Republican Party is more facist then anyone else right now. Do you know why? Because fascism boils down to extreme nationalism. Socialism is an economic theory. Please actually do research before you make statements such as these.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:33 PM
1

May I ask what's wrong with socialism?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:28 PM
5

I really appreciate the one argument that "Jane" made. “Weighing in on a situation that doesn’t impact your life is absolutely going to be harmful because it’s saying the people who are impacted don’t deserve to speak and your voice is more important.” This is the exact same argument that feminists use to say anything about their rights and their bodies. The hypocrisy is completely clear here. They want women to have control of their bodies, unless it's prostitution in which case they are appare…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:29 PM
2

Nice!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:43 AM
9

I didn't make the list....that's sad....I'm also still not banned from /r/Pyongyang
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:43 PM
0

Seriously if this is the worst that he says, he STILL has my vote. He cares about men's issues as well. He wants support networks for men suffering from depression anxiety. Wants to set up support networks for soldiers (primarily men) coming home from war. He is the only really honest candidate out there, that isn't going to remove rights from people.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:41 PM
2

Cross post this with /r/tumblrinaction and you can maximize your karma efficiency.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:04 PM
3

I'm just going go ahead a tell you that this is NOT female privilege. This is classism and privilege given to celebrities. Male actors and musicians do this shit all the time and are not arrested. Don't try to equate the two.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:01 PM
3

wait wait wait wait, so they criticized Fury and Foxcatcher for not having enough women....Both of those films are historical fiction. There were not women fighting in WWII, especially in the Tank division. and Foxcatcher is about a male wrestlers in the olympics. I'm confused as to how they are supposed to shoehorn women in, in order to make it acceptable for this test.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:29 PM
1

I mean the atheist community seems just as toxic nowadays as all the crazy evangelicals. It sucks because I have so much respect for academic atheists like Carl Sagan, but then you see it now and you wonder what the fuck happened.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:00 PM
1

Oh man, you went through that. I'm sorry, I read a bunch of studies on it and it seems like it was the worst. It went from a community that was open to all possible discussions, to now telling anyone that is religious that they are inherently wrong and should feel bad for it.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:12 PM
1

The problem is fiscally I am liberal, as well as my views of government. Also socially I'm a liberal (abortions, gay marriage, marijuana). So you see the dilemma
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:03 PM
1

It just always seems like even though I am a liberal, me being egalitarian makes me no longer a liberal, and me being a liberal makes me an enemy of MRA
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:01 PM
1

It just always seems like liberals are attacked here
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:00 PM
1

I dunno I think he might have a good shot against a sand which. A burger however he would be destroyed
/r/MensRights27/02/15 09:59 PM
1

I don't disregard anyone's opinion. I've learned through my history studies that there are multiple sides to every story. I think I understand what you're saying all around though.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:53 PM
1

I feel like you are trying to make multiple arguments. Also the hostility confuses me.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:46 PM
2

Isn't that what Stephen Colbert tried to prove with his Superpac, that even though people donate money to this "Entity" they can literally do whatever they want with it, including keep it and reimburse themselves for personal wealth that they use in running a campaign
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:27 PM
2

Corporations would claim that they aren't being represented. I actually thought there was a limit of like 500k, they just get around it through superpacs and the like
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:23 PM
1

I know it seems like that but realistically in the United States anyway, Gender Politics is intrinsically linked to fiscal politics. Well I should clarify that to Social Politics are intrinsically linked to Fiscal
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:22 PM
3

I wasn't whining, I was just asking a question. Here it seems like being a liberal is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:21 PM
2

That is disgusting. It made me a little sick to be honest.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:18 PM
2

The thing is most of the Libertarians broadcast themselves as rightist libertarians. The left libertarian doesn't really get anything towards it except scorn
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:07 PM
2

Nope, as proven with the last election. Romney had how much money dumped towards him?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:05 PM
3

I think another issue is that no one wants to risk funding outside the two parties.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:40 PM
3

Makes sense and I also did that political compass thing and it said I was far left far libertarian
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:39 PM
3

I did that test and it said I was in the bottom left hand corner. Very strongly Liberal Libertarian
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:37 PM
2

I personally don't believe that kind of funding should even be legal.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:33 PM
1

I knew that Obama was more right leaning I didn't know that about Hillary though
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:31 PM
2

Yeah, I completely agree with you, the problem is that as of right now it is the truth of the matter. I think it's a sign of progress in the last election the independent candidate got what....like 1% of the vote overall?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:24 PM
1

That's what I'm starting to think too. Maybe the more young people who vote independent it might bring us closer to multi-party
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:12 PM
3

ummmmmm
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:11 PM
3

Which ends up being an independent most of the time, which sucks in the two-party system of the US, because you're essentially abstaining from your vote
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:51 PM
3

I hear what you are saying, but I believe in the right for women to have abortions, free healthcare, redistribution of wealth away from the elite and to the poor. I feel there should be stricter gun control laws. I feel that there should be some middle ground between socialism and capitalism. I completely disagree with the concepts of the free market economy. I fully endorse the separation of church and state. I believe that we should not destroy nature. I support the legalization of the recreat…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:47 PM
2

Yeah I guess. The only way to vote and feel good about my vote would be to vote independent, but that might as well be abstaining for all the good it does.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:32 PM
3

I agree and disagree with you. I believe that gender roles are inherently toxic. I am a social scientist and a information scientists by education, so I see where you are coming from. But at the same time my own personal experiences such as being bullied for having feelings, constantly being told to "man up", people rejecting my ideas of masculinity makes me want to get rid of that. I don't want people to feel threatened due to their gender, I don't want people to be judged because of their gend…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:31 PM
2

What do you mean many people got here from a different place and for a different reason?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:29 PM
2

I agree with your rejection. I understand everything you're saying I'm just wondering how I'm supposed to internalize these decisions. I refuse to vote for anyone that is going to take rights away from my girlfriend. I guess I just have to follow the other commenter to vote for the lesser of two evils
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:29 PM
-1

Isn't that also the point. Ron previously got woman of the year and Leslie thought a bitchfit because he was a man.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:34 PM
2

The episode actually did say that, which is the funny part. It was mocking all of these gender-equality fighters in the same way, and ended on the tone that. Why does it fucking matter what you wanna do with your life. It's yours. If you wanna bake, bake the hell out of some delicious brownies. If you wanna work, go work your ass off and reach for the stars. If you wanna do both, more power to you.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:20 PM
1

Ohh I completely agree, and while I do think men's reproductive rights are important. I am more concerned with 1. the wage gap between the ultra rich and everyone else and 2. starving kids in africa. All of this bullshit doesn't matter if we can't care about the people who are actually struggling.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:15 PM
8

Oh absolutely. What SNL did was entirely disingenuous. Parks and Rec however had them complaining about being under a woman's thumb, and rejecting the help of Anti-feminist women who was portrayed as super reasonable. MRA: When can there be a conversation involving equal rights that isn't headed by a women. Anti-fem: I actually completely agree with that. MRA: Shut up, I don't want to hear a women's opinion. I mean it was in jest, as most Anti-fems, egalitarians, and humanists agree that women s…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:12 PM
8

Exactly. And both Parks and Rec and 30 Rock have been quick to criticize feminism especially modern feminism. One could argue Amy Poehlers character is there to criticize third wave feminism, which cares almost exclusively for changing peoples thoughts on ideas. On paper women have exactly the same rights as men, its people's perception of women and the privileges that are inadvertently associated with that perception that they are now fighting to change. First and Second wave feminists were act…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:19 PM
50

This episode heavily criticized the Feminist movement in politics as well. The whole episode was about a pie baking contest for candidates wives, not spouses wives, and whether or not that was sexist (which it is). However they also criticized the feminist movement as well by having Amy straight up say Mens Rights is nothing and men mean nothing, as well as the NOW pull their support for Ben Wyatt because Amy's character was going to participate in order to help Ben's career. They claimed that a…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:05 PM
1

This was on r/tumblrinaction like last week. I doubt this is real. The "story" is the same as it was posted there. Can we please have verify sources before we jump on a witch hunt.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:00 PM
17

There shouldn't be a whose worse. This isn't a pissing competition.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:44 PM
11

They didn't cancel it because it's "not feminist" they cancelled it due to the exclusive nature of the show. The show does not feature men who are raped, men who identify as women who are raped, trans men/women, gender-fluid, or homosexuality. I think the decision is the right one and one that we should support. I actually think it's ridiculous that other students are pissed off because the show is attempting to be more inclusive. That should be the headline here. Edit: Clarity and and more thou…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:15 PM
6

Posts like this that group all Democrats and liberals to be feminists and make all MRAs to be republicans are why I distance myself from the movement. I am both a MRA and a Liberal Democrat. I don't think we should bring party affiliations into these discussions because all that does is drive away young college aged men who ARE liberal democrats.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:26 PM
1

There is something to be said about women being equivocated with Sexual Choice (meaning they are in charge of sex) and men being equated with sex itself. This article shows how completely sexist the laws are. It basically says that all men want sex all the time and that women choose when to have sex, because with these laws Sex is being used to describe vanilla, missionary sex for procreation. ergo Women are in charge of procreation and men are just there to supply sperm. Everyone knows for a fa…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:49 PM
4

Did anyone else notice how absolutely degrading they were when you opted out. Here is the quote we're offering you access to more than one million girls - girls who are here specifically to look at you, talk about you, and give you attention - and you're not interested. You have better things to do. You'd rather be somewhere else. We get it. Really. That doesn't sound crazy at all. So please tell me how that isn't sexist and demeaning? Also that just reinforces traditional gender roles by claimi…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:27 PM
2

It still links to your facebook though. How do you know that's not adding yourself onto it.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 10:23 PM
1

I think this is a fantastic idea, Because it would those who do not know that much of the rhetoric of gender discussion have somewhere to start as well as some information to use. Plus having these clearly defined goals and guidelines will allow us to have intelligent and mature conversations with feminists. We need this intelligent discussion so those of us in college can communicate with those in queer studies.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter