TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

andobail Archive

View 0 posts and 157 comments by andobail on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Women with autism are more sociosexually successful than neurotypical men.
/r/BlackPillScience29/08/23 08:07 PM
3

You believe that an autistic man who is 5' 8" is more sociosexually successful than an equivalently autistic man who is 6' 2"? The "blackpill" holds that looks dominate all when other factors are accounted for.
/r/BlackPillScience29/08/23 08:06 PM
1

Nah, you radiate virulent purulent toxicity.
/r/BlackPillScience29/08/23 08:04 PM
4

People are reaching for behavioral reasons, but if all men with autism looked like Henry Cavill none of them would have any dating problems. Behavioral issues in men, like interpersonal violence and aggression for example, are often strongly associated with more sociosexual success, not less. Unless the autism is particularly severe (accompanied by profoundly low IQ), the mental and behavioral manifestations are not culpable. Autism is almost always accompanied by physical deformations, especial…
/r/BlackPillScience29/08/23 08:02 PM
5

The general rule of thumb is that the more neurotic and belabored an explanation is, the more wrong it is. Something to keep in mind. Ugly man is creepy. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:36 PM
11

Apart from glaring examples like outright predators, it's always about how conventionally attractive a man is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:35 PM
–

He didn't say cougars (casual sex). He said relationships. Try to be honest when you communicate and have dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:33 PM
3

Not to mention experience gaps are to be taken as the same if we're being honest, as they're the central reason age gap relationships between adults are now being placed under the microscope by spinsters. A single mother who had a fun phase or a marriage already is preying on a guy she's trying to date if he's lonely and has little to no sexual past/romantic experience. He won't be able to discern when she's using him because he needs to grow in experience with someone with a similar level of ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:24 PM
0

No, they're just less willing to be honest about it, because (they feel) it reflects poorly on them and they're very emotionally immature so they can't navigate interpersonal conflict well. It's just typical coy, agreeable and status preserving behavior. In other words, distinctly feminine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:18 PM
1

You can't improve looks in any way relevant to attraction. It's neurotic to think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 02:09 AM
1

You don't understand the concepts you're trying to discuss and it shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:53 AM
1

If you ended up substantially more mature at 25 than you were at 18, you were developmentally delayed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:51 AM
1

It was less odd for your parents, it would be more odd these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:39 AM
1

a FWB is not stringing someone along It is if you don't state your endgoal from the beginning (marriage with kids, retirement plans, etc.). Don't be the creep nice guy fake FRIEND WB hiding his intentions just to get in her pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:38 AM
1

You're watching too much porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:36 AM
1

Yes, that is how production and consumption of a product functions. And? It takes one dealer to damage an entire neighborhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:35 AM
1

Yeah, it's a hilarious example that you can't become more attractive through effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:34 AM
1

If sex is that intimate and vulnerable then the guys who say that women show who they love the most with who they have sex with the fastest and most intensely are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:31 AM
1

It'll barely take the edge off until it's enough to render you into a stupor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:22 AM
1

He hasn't really done anything. He's riding a wave and cashing in while he can. Other than that he's an internet persona. The phenomenon that elevated him is just a growing discontentment with life among young men who don't want to be cattle. Tate is probably the most benign way that discontentment could be expressed. "Fuck bitches get money" is an ancient idea and not particularly dangerous to social order or society, given how it has lived alongside every society for as long as there are writt…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:20 AM
-2

After 29 only casual relationships with women matter. 18-29 is the only age range where serious relationships with women matter, so, excluding all relationships that are geriatric, wrinkly, and without value (not 18-29), which sex cheats more?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:43 PM
0

The reasons are not discernible by survey, women have a sociosexual instinct to lie about motivations, behaviors, and outcomes regarding sexuality, relationships, and men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:41 PM
0

Marriage is meant to be extremely difficult to get out of. If it wasn't it would be pointless. If it's not massively substantially different from not being married legally, its a play pretend thing. Also, entirely your sister's fault for making a bad choice in mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:40 PM
-3

Nope, you have literally never heard this but you are a dishonest person without dignity who wants to feel right rather than BE right. The idea is that you need to find a "young virginal woman", and then eventually marry her, somewhere down the line. There is no prescription to marry young among the race of straw men you've constructed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:38 PM
–

They're not trying to do the made up thing you're suggesting dishonestly and without integrity. They're trying to get others to admit it, as you've just done. Not just women but simps as well. I think it's a fool's errand, because the denial is ideological and cult-like. As you've evidenced, ideologues of this sort only admit to the truths when these truths serve their own position. Also it serves little purpose to extract an admission of the truth, because the data is already there and is plain…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 08:18 AM
1

Masking to pass is rape by deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 12:47 AM
1

He wasn't talking about "someone", he was talking about women, quite obviously about women who are potential sex partners. Have some integrity and be honest and dignified in the way you communicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 12:45 AM
1

Well, since the enfranchisement of women in the US, the taller candidate has nearly always won because women vote for who they find more sexually appealing. So, with that under consideration, I would say the overthrow of democratically elected leaders, supporting genocidal dictators and genocides, and destroying nations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:47 PM
1

Men simp for ugly women, so both of them are presenting a falsehood. They're just trying to co-opt incel imagery and turn it on it's head, but the position of female obsession with a small portion of men is represented in the data, while the idea of a male obsession with a small portion of women ("stacy") is not. And never has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:36 PM
1

But what’s in it for us? Even asking a question like this would get you ghosted by any man with self-respect/dignity. If you're going to be a prostitute, you have to name an explicit price. A woman who is attracted to a man, which is the only way for a meaningful/healthy relationship to even be considered let alone start, would be thinking solely about how to be around him, please him, and get him to like her.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:34 PM
3

You are a dishonest person. Unless you consider sex to be a negative, evil, bad thing, you inherently understand it to be a good thing. Thus when you have it with someone you are objectively treating them better than others. The faster, more frequently, and more passionately you're willing to have it the better you are treating them. You know this though, you are hoping to do some dishonest wordplay or manipulative nonsense to get around it. You aren't trying to be truthful, just le win. Have so…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:31 PM
2

There are no coulds, shoulds, woulds, blah blah blah, in dating. The answer is, if you don't treat me the best you've ever treated a man (and unless you consider sex to be a negative and punishing bad thing, then it's under the category of treating good), then you're not attracted to me in any way that I could ever let lead to a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:29 PM
12

You are dishonestly and intentionally conflating different kinds of love. Raw sexual passion that can only be evidenced by casual sex or a willingness to have it, is a non-negotiable pre-requisite for genuine romantic love. This kind of love is a necessity for a meaningful relationship and later family life. The kind of love a man who can't get casual sex gets is platonic and/or familial, the other two kinds of love that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:28 PM
1

Nah, you are just female brained and so project your feminine selectivity onto other men. "Incels" are happy with fat single mom attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:45 AM
1

No, cuckkoldry is not as common as you want to pretend, nor does cuckoldry make a man secure and well-adjusted lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:42 AM
1

The only thing brought to the table in casual sex is genetic traits. So it has no meaning for men looking for casual sex who can't get it. It's like telling a woman with low IQ who is applying for welfare, "what do you bring to the table?" She can't bring anything to the table even if she wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:40 AM
1

Yeah, have women interested now that I'm entering my late 20s. Some of the girls I grew up with are getting divorced or looking to settle down. The nut and ghost strategy is serving me well now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:36 AM
1

"Chad" never works on his looks. He is tall and handsome. A man who has to work on his looks is not "Chad".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:31 AM
2

It is exactly how attractive men act. Unabashed and cunning sexuality. They form friendships knowing that later on they are going to introduce a sexual element to it, without having a woman's written legal consent first to start the friendship. Gasp!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:30 AM
1

All readers be aware, it's this victim complex/simp complex that JNRoberts42 has that he's calling out. The artificial injection of a victim mentality and a persecutor and le helpless victim in the conversation is rancid and undignified behavior. Have dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:29 AM
7

It's not an unpopular opinion, it's just a false statement. Trying to reframe it as someone disagreeing when they correct it, is inherently dishonest. The statistics are brutal and overwhelming. The least attractive women have as many sexual and romantic opportunities as the most attractive men. The pig woman experiment is particularly revealing in this regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:27 AM
-3

If they were truly friends, the women would want to make them feel as good as possible. For a straight man, that means women draining his balls.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:25 AM
4

Attraction isn't a choice, he didn't disregard anything. Fuckbuddies and FWBs exist and he is no more "disregarding" of her than the tall handsome platonic friends who later decide they want more that she's completely receptive to. They would ghost her if she didn't put out, but they're le good people because she wants to drain their balls. How bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:24 AM
4

There are no "terms" in friendship. The language you use betrays that you don't actually view these unattractive men as friends, you view them as utilities/asexual non-humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:17 AM
2

The short/ugly faced male lied by not disclosing he was anything except asexual. The tall handsome guy who was "just friends" and comes at her after a year of platonic friendship saying its time to be fuck buddies, well that's different tee hee.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:16 AM
0

Nah, you're just a simp and she wants to play victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 01:16 AM
1

Sure it's possible, but the others are incorrect that narcissists are generally insecure. By the literature, they are typically less insecure than the general population, and are not faking this confidence. They generally have very high self-esteem and are highly secure and confident individuals. They have a pathological derision and contempt for others, and regard themselves as exceptional.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 09:31 AM
1

This same principles justifies the opposite opposition as well. So what if someone compels you to provide your money to fund entitlements like welfare? Life isn't fair, remember. The principle of "life is not fair so any of your problems are your own" is a kind of nihilism, because it justifies everything it means nothing and doesn't really properly advocate for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 09:23 AM
1

Individualism is directly opposed to capitalism. The structures of the state that maintain the web of safety necessary for capitalism to function are maintained only because others "owe" each other something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 09:20 AM
1

It's a serious problem with the quality of the studies. They conflate interest and attraction. Women are not attracted to wealthy men, they are interested in them. It's not the same thing, but there is motivation to produce poor quality studies that reflect positively on particular worldviews. Namely, that men can somehow "earn" attractiveness, when this is not the case. Innate genetic qualities determine how attractive a man is. Men can become more interesting to women in a cold calculated way,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 09:15 AM
1

Tall height is absolutely required to be a good looking man in the truest sense. Hold all traits identical and the taller version of a man is always better looking than the shorter version.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 09:11 AM
1

They want short/ugly men to be submissive and available "friends" (that is, utilities), and they want tall/handsome men to be friends/fuck buddies. It's that simple. They're enraged because a non-human resource has asserted itself when in their eyes it shouldn't even have a sexuality, and should exist to be an asexual "friend" to her. Whatever words they dress it up in doesn't change this, it remains the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 01:24 AM
1

They're identical and only grifters would try to sell it otherwise. The pre-requisite for a genuine romantic relationship is passionate sexual arousal to a person. That's a definitional thing, disagreeing won't change it. You are intentionally conflating romantic, platonic, and familial love. They are non-overlapping and distinct. If it isn't preceded by or involving passionate sexual arousal, it isn't romantic love. It is platonic or familial. Have integrity. Be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:45 PM
1

That's not Chad bud. Chad can be skinnyfat, obese, etc. He just needs to be tall with a handsome face. He certainly doesn't hit the gym to pick up women lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:43 PM
1

Women's comments are way tamer here than their actions IRL. These communities are forming because massive amounts of men are having the exact same negative experiences with women. It's actually an international and mainstream phenomenon now. That grifters like Tate can get so popular is because the sentiment has entered the mainstream after being pushed off the internet. This happened after attempts by reddit and other social media sites to suppress any negative discussion of women through banni…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:40 PM
5

I work at two restaurants and I see homeless black men under 3'2" out with them baddies all the time. yo' u feel me fo sho my rizzle ? There's way more. Men above 3'2" can struggle with women. Rich guys can struggle. Poor guys slay. Loners can do well and socialites can do poorly. Obese guys can have their jabba the hurt harem and guys who are shredded have only themselves for eye candy. The point is that the pills absolutely suck at analyzing why some guys do well and others do poorly. And that…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:35 PM
6

You're really sheltered and naive. It's nowhere near 1/4th of women. By the statistics it hovers around 1 in 100 are interested (note, not attracted) to men at your height or lower, whereas almost 1 in 5 men are your height or lower. Your own confessed experiences betray the poverty of your life experiences and especially your romantic and sexual experiences. That you ever had an involuntary dry spell (that is, were quite literally definitionally an incel), as you admitted and described lasting …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:34 PM
1

You can do it all at a public park for free. Pullups, pushups, crunches, just the basics. When you want to increase the resistance put on a backpack and stick some books or something uniformly heavy inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:46 PM
1

You should only date your same height, melanin, eye color, weight, etc. 5' 1" women need to stick with Danny Devito.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:44 PM
13

Yep, people want to put the cart before the horse. Men turn to porn because doing the same things as the guys who get sex doesn't get them sex, and doing anything else doesn't either. Men turn to porn when sex with women is simply physically literally not available to them. A very small percentage are genuinely obsessed, but those probably ALL have an underlying disorder like ADHD or bipolar mania that would cause obsession with something else that would cause them not to go out and seek out wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:21 PM
1

You got dominated, sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:18 PM
1

They know they're being dishonest, they know they're pretending you said things you didn't. Their goal is not honesty, they're just trying to double down and hope you bow out so thy can feel right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:17 PM
1

im glad you agree that being gay is a choice
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:16 PM
1

you wouldn't know they exist if you weren't bending over for them. you're just telling on yourself. if you don't want men like this, stop rewarding men like this with access.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:14 PM
1

By not finding his micropenis intensely sexually arousing, she has pushed him away 100%. Total sexual arousal is the basis of genuine romantic love. They do not have a real relationship. She is a con artist using him, he needs to get out of her harpy grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:13 PM
1

The issue is he keeps asking her about it? Yes that's definitely the issue, not the physical biological reality that pervades existence. Nope, some phrases and words. LMAO So she's increasingly associating his dick with his insecurity Nah, there are also plenty of insecure guys who are conventionally handsome, tall, big dicked, etc. and women don't gradually associate their tallness, handsomeness, or big dickness with insecurity. You're reaching hard to find reasons why woman is innocent princes…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:12 PM
1

He's 100% a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:09 PM
1

Old wrinkly ugly women often get the "ick" and such from things that just totally coincidentally just so happen just randomly totes omg don't benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:06 PM
1

You have problems with people on your level?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:05 PM
1

A 30% failure rate in the most important thing in a human beings life by definition, is freakish and horrific. Worse than a 30% failure rate of brake pedals in cars on the highway.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:04 PM
1

I love these sorts of posts because it really illustrates the statistical/mathematical illiteracy of the person making the post. Anyone with any background in statistics sees the opposite point of what the con artist grifter misusing the statistics like sian is trying to make. Trying to redirect other statistically illiterate people to the minutiae so they forget the bigger picture is just textbook grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:03 PM
1

barren
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:00 PM
11

They get rejected because they are short with ugly faces lmao it has nothing to do with behavior, any woman would date a tall handsome misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:37 PM
1

Damn, the scientific method is totally refuted here. Turn the lights on upstairs, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:35 PM
1

You think they magically just get the money? Literally every job that exists is harder than raising children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:32 PM
3

If you say you do this, you will get the opposite thing as advice if it doesn't get you women. If you do the opposite thing, you will get this as advice. When both don't work, they just go with whatever you're currently doing and say the opposite. If you stopped doing either because neither work, they just pick one or both at random.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 04:50 AM
5

An incel is just a man who does not have regular casual sex with women. If he doesn't have casual sex nothing will work to have casual sex? Undim your lightbulb.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 04:49 AM
2

Yeah, going to place A or place B won't change the innate qualities that make a man attractive to women. If men could do action X or action Y that worked in general, this subreddit would not exist. The large glut of permasingle men (20%+) who span all walks of life and income levels but are generally quite physically ugly in terms of height and their handsomeness, are that way because women don't want them. Not because they aren't willing to go to place A and do action X. They've been going to y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 04:47 AM
4

you probably start getting women to overlook the height problem. They're not overlooking it, you've just gained enough currency (money + status + competency) to purchase them. They don't need to be purchased by tall handsome men, they just fall in love with them. You can't effort/achieve/negotiate your way into loveability. That's from innate qualities. You can only effort your way into prostitutive exchanges.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 04:42 AM
1

There is bountiful research on height, which is just the length/size of bones at its baseline. And it's quite brutal. It is responsible for something like 90%+ of a man's attractiveness. It is more significant than connections, competence, and social savvy combined in affecting income potential and how much others will like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:29 AM
1

It just sounds like you struggle with reading and math. Given the state of schools in places like Guatemala and Brazil it's not really surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:27 AM
1

If he has options he has no reason to love you back. She loves him because he's that much better than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:25 AM
1

None of the non-STEM fields are sciences. They are pseudoscience grifter bunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:24 AM
0

You come across as very slow and antagonistic. No one is impressed, babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 02:23 AM
2

The definition of an incel is wholly and exclusively a man who can't get casual sex from women. So they have precisely...0 things in common. The neurotic response you might try to reply with won't suffice to redefine what an incel is LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:25 AM
4

Everyone already knows these labels don't "warn" women, they excite them. Just like calling a guy a misogynist or a wife beater or talking about his big dick or how tall he is. Everyone knows the actual function of gossip, get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:17 PM
1

Its what makes you spread your legs at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:16 PM
1

No, guys need that at 18 not at 40. You have the ages messed up. Men who are single at 40 have been through the hardest time it is to be lonely (13-24), and don't need women for loneliness. They only need them for sex at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:15 PM
2

People never have problems with the stuff that isn't true. It's the harsh truths that people have trouble accepting. Natey boy is making up men he "knows" to push his grifter position, and his fellow grifters are coming in on their knees with their tongues out to lick and slurp at the grift. We know from the hard, fixed data what women actually like and don't like and the redpill is entirely a grift in that respect as well. You can't improve your attractiveness by going to the gym and getting a …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:08 PM
17

You are correct. Women show their sexual passion and genuine attraction by who they want to have sex with and how fast. If she wouldn't have casual sex with you, she isn't attracted to you, and if she has casual sex with another man faster than you she is more attracted to him than you. The women and simps here conflate attraction with cold calculated interest because they're intellectually dishonest people without integrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:04 PM
1

Only low test feminine men don't want to have their own kids. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:01 PM
1

No it doesn't, women have the cuckold mantra for men that step-dads and guys who raise kids without even knowing they aren't theirs are still "dads". Of course, they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:00 PM
6

They are all strictly biological traits. A man's height and how handsome his face are, are the sole determinants of his attractiveness. All the evidence that exists backs this up. Don't be a dishonest person. I know you're trying to conflate concepts to feel right, but interest is not attraction and you cannot earn your way into being an attractive man through effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 05:59 PM
1

Only if they're like, oh em gee, uggo mcbuggos though sista! omg!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:55 AM
1

You tell the grocery store clerk explicitly that "I will not be having sex with you during the process of checking out today," every time? What? Try to be an honest person with dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:54 AM
1

You never heard of a woman who had casual sex who then didn't have sex at least as fast as she's ever had it with any man after that? What? So a woman who had sex with a guy she met at a bar in the bathrooms that evening always has sex at least in the bar's bathroom immediately with any man she's interested in in the future? I don't think the lights are on upstairs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:53 AM
1

Heavy emphasis should be on statistically more likely. Odds are 99:1 that of any two men, the taller one will be regarded as more attractive by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:50 AM
1

No the height is primary, hence why you have to name older actors who reached the peak of their career at a time when marketing to women was less significant and men were cast largely for their appeal to the gay producers and directors that wanted chances to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:48 AM
1

Yeah, he's being dishonest. Male models average something like 6' 2". 98th percentile height. There are gay male models and gay actors that average shorter because they were selected by gay men and are for gay men and thus reflect gay male preferences. He also knows no short "chads", by definition "chad" is not short. It's not even a thing that can be debated. Take two literally identical men except for height. Whichever one is more attractive to more women is "Chad".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:47 AM
1

Unless he has her at gunpoint she is never stuck in any way at all. Homelessness and poverty and danger to life and limb are normal situations and consequences of choices, if that's what she faces when she leaves him she's not facing anything unreasonable/unusual. Managing your life to avoid those things regardless of agreements/relationships you enter into is 100% your own responsibility and not something someone else is holding over you. It's your problem and your fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:44 AM
1

They can't have them if women don't find tall handsome misogynists extremely sexually arousing. Women create misogynists, they raise misogynists, and they sexually reward and encourage misogynists. Misogyny would not exist without this positive approval and effort by women to maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:40 AM
–

The problem with your narcissism is that everyone else here is also human, a fact you forgot. So they know what it means to think like a human and reach human conclusions. Facts you also forget in your narcissistic stupor. And humans don't think the way you say you do, so you do not think the way you say you do. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:36 AM
–

Nope, you view 95%+ of men as utilities. Particularly genetically physically attractive men are viewed as people by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:35 AM
–

You're not going to get honest answers online, especially not from women. Go out and do it and see if they smile back or show disgust with cold expressions. Trust your own eyes. Have some self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:31 AM
–

It is NOT dishonest. Thank you for owning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:30 AM
–

Speaking generally, you can learn to use stable diffusion yourself if you have even a moderately decent graphics card, and run it locally on your machine without even internet access. It's not an exceptionally complicated process and there are step-by-step instructions out there on how to use it for every purpose imaginable. Certain websites going down won't impede its use.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:26 AM
–

No porn is ever consensual. It relies on the economic distress of the people involved to coerce it. Economic coercion is still coercion and you cannot give consent under those circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:23 AM
–

Why are you so terrified of his question? You're shaking and trembling at the prospect of having to answer it forwardly, and dodging it like a little frightened baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:22 AM
–

Yeah, some people get off the registry and never re-offend. You're chill with that, right? You'd date that person?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:21 AM
–

Monogamy takes into account the past. Serial monogamy is an intellectually dishonest concept and is not monogamy. Monogamy is when you have one partner for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:20 AM
–

Nah, the people you're worthy of associating with are just crappy people if you have to have that neurotic way of dealing with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:19 AM
–

This is easily 90% of heterosexual relationships where children are involved Nope, just the men you preferentially have sex with and thus reward for their misogyny with pleasure and joy. Misogyny wouldn't exist without the women that celebrate it by rewarding it with sexual pleasure. You're only telling on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:17 AM
–

Why is women choosing freely to seek out specifically and give sexual pleasure to misogynist men and have their children evidence of the patriarchy? That's not even getting into that unless you live in a very brutal 3rd world backwater, you having children is voluntary and a luxury that not everyone can afford. Is buying a sports car also a sign of the patriarchy? Ticking off your lifegoal facebook checklist item of "have kids" is a personal luxury/self-indulgence, and is nobody else's problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:16 AM
1

Because they prefer better things over worse things? Why would they PREFER worse things? What a strange point of view. Should women prefer violently abusive midget men who shart constantly and diarrhea in the bed?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:59 AM
1

Human have been doing lots of awful things for centuries. Terrible argument. Tattoos are no different than that tribe that stretches out their lips to look like big round discs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:58 AM
1

This same argument can be used about the right to vote, which is inseparably tied to the existence of the selective service.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:55 AM
1

No, its typically trad Christian nonsense. That there is a subcategory of secretly special devout Godly pure women who need your saving and you need to le wife them up and fulfill God's will by having trad!!1!! families. It's crept into TRP from very early on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:53 AM
1

Algebra is just an "is your IQ higher than 90" feature.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:49 AM
1

Why does every prostitute here try to pull off a sassy intelligent act?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:49 AM
1

No, men can be more interesting over time. Interest isn't attraction. Attraction is to things like how tall a man is, how handsome his facial structure is. Interest is in things like how he behaves, how many assets he has, how much money he has, how submissive (husband material) and easily dominated he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:47 AM
1

I personally met five hundred tinder engineers and they explained to me the opposite of what you said. Low IQ and neurodivergent men think tinder isn't real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:45 AM
1

5'0" men are absolutely a niche. their reproductive odds are lower than the niche look tattoo woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:43 AM
1

The vast majority of pedophiles pick victims in their own families, and most of the time the perpetrator is the father. Since the genetic and height data is very clear that women are selecting for tall handsome men quite intensely, and these men represent the majority of pedophiles, we know that women are selectively having children with these predators.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:40 AM
1

All the misogynist men I know love tattoos. They see them as marking an easy/freaky lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:38 AM
1

Florida is getting rid of AP classes because they're illiterate inbred conservatives. Dumb people behaving dumbly. No surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:37 AM
–

there always were guys who just couldn't grasp how to deal with women. Yes, these guys have always existed alongside incels, but we've never had a name for them like we have for incels (innately physically unattractive men).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:21 AM
2

No, not logical at all. You can't negotiate attraction and he hasn't "self-improved" he's just gotten more assets/wealthier. Maturity is actually just a personality type, the men who are mature, stable, and good natured at 30 were mature, stable, and good natured at 18. You don't "self-improve" into passion arousing sexual attractiveness, you "self-improve" into wealth, assets, etc. The things that make you a mark for older predatory women who couldn't lock down men they're genuinely physically …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:37 AM
2

American women are openly prostitutional at 30+. They don't magically find these put together men attractive, they just couldn't lock down the physically attractive men they genuinely love that they gave it up to in their youth. People know now, you'll have to come up with a new shtick.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:32 AM
3

There are not, and the data is set in stone on this. The ugliest woman that has ever lived, as per the pig woman experiment, has more options than the most handsome man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:29 AM
-3

Yes, men who don't want rancid geriatric elderly women are predators. LMAO not the hissing verminous leering run through women who are looking for inexperienced men to "lock down" in horrible life situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:28 AM
3

A 30 year old man without experience by definition cannot be looking to settle down because he literally has no idea what that means and cannot know until he's sown his wild oats. It's as simple as that. A woman with more experience is taking advantage of him if she tries to con him into settling down before he's had his fun with multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:27 AM
0

You're not in the same stage of life. The same stage of life is DEFINED by experience. Actions are the most important thing. A woman who has lots more sexual experience than you is grooming you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:26 AM
1

He didn't specify that. Don't be scared of the question. Just answer honestly and earn some dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:25 AM
3

Women don't mature in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:23 AM
1

Your panties are all twisted from him dominating you lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:58 PM
1

She is worse than damaged goods. If she doesn't disclose her geriatric encounters to her mentally healthy non-geriatric seeking partners in the future, they can't give informed consent. It's no different than being in a scat/fecal fetish scene and not telling your partners, thus exposing them to things they wouldn't consent to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:55 PM
–

you're a wanna be geriatric lmao get a grip
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:52 PM
–

Actions > words. Motivations are irrelevant. A person is a predator if they do a predator action, not if they have the feefee that is bad. This is the fundamental difference in morality between men and women. Women think a person is good if they have good thoughts even if they do bad things, men require a person to do good things to be good, regardless of their thoughts Either age gap relationships are predatory and the older participants are predators, or they are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:49 PM
3

Commodifying (mostly) women, a large majority of whom are from desperate economically depressed backgrounds or straight up trafficked as sex slaves, to be the commercial rape toys of men who would otherwise be forcibly raping women on the street or in their families, is not a solution to a problem. Just get rid of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:26 PM
1

Sometimes it feels rly good to be invisible. Because I can do whatever the hell I want. You're not truly invisible unless attention itself is never an option for you. Invisibility isn't something undesirables can turn on and off at a whim. That's not the phenomenon. It's something that applies to empathy toward you as well. If you ever receive positive attention or empathy from others, you are not invisible. Likewise, if you EVER experienced it, you are not invisible. It is a thing that begins a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:32 AM
1

men over 30s get attention and are only wanted for their maturity and development Why lie like this? That's not what they're wanted for. Men know they haven't changed much from their early 20s, they just earn more money and are lonelier/more desperate. The men who get more attention from women in their 30s were just as mature in their late teens early 20s, they just didn't have as many assets and women weren't as desperate. People see through your shtick so easily. It's time to get a new grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:22 AM
1

The women don't care about the utility men in their 30s. That's the point. You are straining your neck to avoid the obvious and your position loses all its coherency as a result. The women care about the men they are genuinely physically and sexually attracted to in their late teens early 20s, not the men they see as walking utilities/workhorses that they settle with in their 30s if they couldn't get a guy they were genuinely attracted to in their early 20s to settle down with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:17 AM
1

Anyone who responds with a histrionic question to the idea LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:13 AM
0

You are describing how to be a chump/used. If you need those things for women to throw themselves at you, they aren't attracted to you. They're interested in a cold calculated manner. That's not "throwing" themselves at you. They "throw" themselves at men they're genuinely physically sexually attracted to without any of those characteristics. Those things do not matter if she is genuinely attracted to you. She will be tripping over herself to sexually please you no strings attached because of ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:12 AM
2

Your valiant efforts will not go unrewarded, Sir Knight. Your armor shines mostly brilliantly in its white color against the sun! Your reward shall surely be sex!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:10 AM
1

due to being in okay shape, and driving a nice car, and having a decent job. If you need these things to pull women, its not dating. Its prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:08 AM
1

Yes but not in the same way. It must be by it's nature drawn out over time (5 to 10 years of fun experimentation) and really, by your 30s your brain would adaptably respond to your sexual success with the lifelong personal psychological and neurodevelopmental benefits it would have in your late teens and early 20s. You missed out, because women thought you didn't meet certain fixed physical thresholds.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:07 AM
1

Men should not reward hostile women and be slaves for them. Who cares about these fluffy nonsense questions? What matters is if a man is getting what he wants, and he should avoid being a backup/last resort regardless of whose fault blah blah blah simp spewing blah blah etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:04 AM
1

The single common variable in incidences of domestic violence in a woman's life would be her. Are you of the same mind and line of logic in that instance as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:01 AM
1

Nah it's hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:00 AM
0

Not being able to find a happy relationship because of "the quality of men" (the men are just fine btw, the women are just harpies) is the definition of struggling with relationships. If you cannot find a happy relationship it is a problem you have. Period. Saying you prefer to stay single doesn't change that, you still retain a problem that you have not solved and it is a problem with you. If you smell crap everywhere you go, its in your pants. If you cannot find a man to have a happy relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:57 AM
1

Not when she's young and having fun. She doesn't mind financial losers then who drain her and she's eager to please them so long as they meet certain fixed innate physical thresholds. People notice and they won't stop noticing. You'll have to do better with the conning and grifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:55 AM
7

This is exactly it. Anyone knows that if they didn't get attention and suddenly do its not because they become magically attractive. It's because some grifter is trying to get their hooks in for their own personal goals and is trying to hide that that is what it is. It is a huge insult and not worth the trouble and energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:54 AM
2

People grow up and mature so their needs change. No. Just simply no. Don't try this nonsense. Only men in a relationship with you will entertain it. Romantic love isn't about needs its about raw carnal desires inspired by attraction to fixed traits. You're using deceitful language to manipulate people into some weird waxy vague idea. What people genuinely romantically love doesn't change, for life. What a person might be conned out of (time, attention, wealth, assets, effort, energy) does. A wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:50 AM
1

If you have to "better yourself" to get womens attention, they aren't attracted to you. Interest is not attraction and it's dishonest to conflate it. Attraction is arousal to fixed genetic characteristics. Interest is attention to things you can change by effort and "bettering yourself" is for chumps willing to take scraps like good dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:47 AM
1

When you are first dating is what matters. Being last in line is hardly meaningful. Being the last resort is not the goal of any self-respecting man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 11:22 PM
1

No, we're not. This is the reason for the impasse: a lack of intellectual honesty. Please try to practice it going forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/23 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter