TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

angelicnargles Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by angelicnargles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Did anyone else notice how the font and width they chose makes the first line end at an awkward point? For more than two decades, I traveled the country facilitating rape and assault
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:42 AM
9

They got no money back, it was all spent, already.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:30 AM
4

I don't think we want to start down the dark path of double jeopardy. This particular instance might seem clear-cut, but it opens the door to horrible abuse. If you think men have problems now, imagine having to endure multiple trials for a false accusation, and even after an acquittal, having the spectre of a renewed prosecution hanging over your head for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:21 PM
4

Some of the other comments here talk about why the idea is wrong, but I didn't see anyone who really defined the idea for you. Institutional Sexism is the idea that sexism is widespread and generally accepted, to the point that it is basically an unwritten rule. This sexism is enforced in various clandestine ways without overtly discriminating against women, such as by setting job requirements that are more easily attainable by men, requiring women who accuse others of rape to follow the same ru…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 01:24 PM
1

A huge number of dental hygenists are women. Dentists are still mostly men.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:27 AM
1

A great and glorious day for the motherland! In a show of skill and patriotism, our Soviet comrade was able to take second in the long and arduous race, while the capitalist pig from the United States finished next to last in utter humiliation! (Not mentioned in article: It was a two-car race)
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:54 AM
3

Most people who claim to seek 'equality' want equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:48 AM
9

This phenomenon is called 'doublethink': the acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:53 PM
19

"No one should feel satisfied that there is no sexual violence on their campus" And that's about all you need to know about this article.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:17 AM
2

...described the assailant as a Latino man with two teardrops tattooed near his left eye... a third victim... described the same tattoo. Vargas has the faded outline of a [one] teardrop inked under his left eye The three victims identified him as the man who attacked them. Several co-workers testified that Vargas had been miles away at work when the attacks occurred. So... because he was merely similar to the vague description, and because 3 women identified him as being a man they each saw once…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:45 PM
1

I agree with you that prostitution isn't put on the ballot for fear that people would vote to legalize prostitution, but gay marriage was on many ballots in many states, and almost always rejected (or the ballot measure was to prevent/repeal gay marriage and was approved). http://ballotpedia.org/Marriage_and_family_on_the_ballot Glancing through the 30+ historical ballot initiatives on the list, I saw 3 that were in favor of gay marriage, and all others against.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:54 PM
3

This. As far as your questions, take with a grain of salt and with less weight than your legal counsel: You are the man. It would be theoretically possible, but very unlikely, that you could end up with no child support because of equal parenting. This possibility becomes somewhat more likely if you earn way less than her. Child support doubles as mommy support/alimony, unofficially. Your support could theoretically be changed if your income changes, but it is only only likely to change if the n…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:03 AM
111

Some things to remember to make the prenup less likely to be disregarded: Make sure your intended has legal representation hired to look at and give advice on the prenup, that they get a long time to examine it (days or weeks) and that they aren't drunk/high/whatever when negotiating (many prenups are thrown out because one party claims they were 'tricked' or drunk or whatever) Make sure you take care of the prenup well in advance of the wedding (months before, at minimum; many prenups get throw…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 06:18 PM
9

It's called a strict liability crime, which also exists in civilized countries. For instance, breaking the speed limit is a strict liability crime: You get a ticket whether or not you knew you were speeding or intended to speed. Similarly, statutory rape is also a strict liability crime. Having sex with an underage person is a crime regardless of whether the other person knew they were underage, and even if the other person asked for and received 'proof' that they were not underage. http://en.wi…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:57 AM
2

that brings up a more murky situation. hypothetically, if they hooked up in NYC, would new york's age of consent laws take precedence over scotlands? Yes, it would.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:38 PM
2

This sounds like a rather more legal question than a question about men's rights. You will be better served by asking over in /r/legaladvice or, better yet, by contacting a lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:49 AM
2

The banks will not want this. The banks want people to pay them, not to run out of money, stop paying them, and go to jail.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:35 AM
4

From the article: Amelia Earhart, aviator. Wilma Rudolph, athlete. Sally Ride, astronaut. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, activist. Josephine Baker, performer. Virginia Woolf, novelist. Rosie the Riveter, archetype. Alice Paul, suffragist. Frida Kahlo, artist. Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. I don't think any of these, possible excepting 'athlete' and Secretary of State, are really masculine. So I don't think these picks are wrong. They are choosing women who did things that would be considered not…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:32 PM
2

If you read the article, the judge who kept sending him back to prison every 2 weeks, claimed in his order every 2 weeks, that the man was able to pay but unwilling to comply. So either the judge had some reason to believe this guy had secret money hidden somewhere, or he has some malevolent reason for imprisoning him.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 11:12 AM
1

Although child support is 'for the child', there is no actual requirement that any of it be spent for or on the child.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:55 PM
0

It is given to the custodial parent, which is usually the mother.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:18 PM
7

Yes, he must still pay child support already accrued. He would not be free of previous child support debt. He would merely stop accumulating more child support.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:50 AM
1

Arrest records show up on background reports in some places. So even if he is cleared, a record of arrest for sexual assault could chill any possible job opportunity.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:10 AM
1

I don't know that this study is reliable. They are polling only university students, a very small sample at that, and can only poll the sort of students who have the time and the inclination to stop and answer questions from someone who accosts them the moment they enter the building. Also, they don't mention their method for choosing the people for whom they held the doors open, so I wonder if there might be bias in the selection (the door-openers might have chosen people who looked like they h…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:18 PM
-1

I believe this ties in to the idea that women are the only ones who get to make decisions about abortion. Also, 40 weeks is 10 months. So in addition to the above, and perhaps more importantly, this is a feminist who is advocating 'abortions' up to 1 month after birth
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:04 PM
1

Just so people are aware: Chest pain is not something that is treated at Urgent Care facilities. They will tell you to immediately go to the ER. Source: I was told to go directly to the ER by an Urgent Care facility once I told them I was experiencing chest pain.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 12:59 PM
4

Chances are that it would not be enforced retroactively. So a man who previously donated would not be liable for the years of the child/children's life before the law, but could still possibly be liable for years after. Example: Man donates sperm, child is born 5 years before law passes. Now he is liable for child support, but only going forward. So he ends up only paying support for 13 years, instead of 18. This would not be considered ex post facto because any ruling would come after the law. …
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:25 PM
10

Woman is 'of very limited means' and partner is 'wealthy retired banker' This could end up robbing the man's family of some/all of his estate. I don't know about England, but I know in some places it is possible to levy child support against an estate. And, of course, the child might be in a position (or rather, the mother of the child would be in a position) to claim inheritance. Which is to say, it certainly wouldn't hurt the man, but it might hurt others.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:14 PM
-3

Though it is, indeed, discrimination, I feel that the term 'reverse discrimination' still has value to it. It specifies a type of discrimination that is opposite of that which is widely publicized, and often, a type of discrimination that is immediately discounted by the politically correct. When someone talks about 'reverse discrimination', we know immediately that they are talking about a) discrimination that b) is unlikely to be viewed or treated as such by the perpetrators or most observers.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:40 AM
9

The claim is that harassment codes on campuses and elsewhere rely on non-uniform enforcement to stay alive. All harassment codes are basically a way for people of type X to claim that someone insulted type X and for that someone to be reprimanded for it. If X is a politically correct protected class like women or blacks, then it works like the codes say. However, the person above (and the article?) is saying that if X were something different, something that feminists or whoever did not think de…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 12:54 AM
1

This seems to be the same, I don't know if it is related or plaigarism or what: http://dontmarry.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:24 AM
3

While arguing for the need for female agency by denying actual female agency is a massive problem, that's like telling a guy he "should have fought back" when he's in an abusive relationship. Although she could well have stopped the behavior, you can't tell her it was her fault she was treated that way or that it she should have just told him to stop. Using quaint names, however, is merely subjectively bad, while abuse is objectively bad. An abuser can't avoid knowing that what they do is bad (u…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:42 AM
2

They will say they must know who the father is, but what do you think they do in cases where the mother genuinely doesn't know? If she says she doesn't know, and sticks with it, they should accept it. Just make sure that his name isn't on birth certificate, they aren't married or common-law married, etc.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:30 PM
2

I don't normally care too much about strict relevance, but did you accidentally post to mensrights? I didn't even see the words 'men' or 'man' in the article. Or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:24 PM
19

As far as freezing your sperm goes, remember that any woman with a tentative relationship with you can fraudulently obtain your frozen sperm and you are still on the hook if she impregnates herself with it. There was a story on this a few months back in this sub.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 11:57 PM
5

Being pro-choice does not make a mother's baby nonhuman if it was already human. It just means she is okay with killing it before it becomes human. The overall point Pecanpig and the others were making is that if it is okay for the mother to kill it and it isn't murder, then it can't be human, which means that another person killing it isn't murder either. And conversely, if it is murder for another person to kill it, it must be human and so it would also be murder if the mother killed it. The '…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:21 AM
4

errythangthizzin is correct. The Apex Fallacy is assuming that, because most or all people in power share a certain characteristic, that all those who share that characteristic must also benefit in similar fashion. As you have noted, iggybdawg, feminists apply this to men. It is odd that no one thinks to gather other characteristics shared by those in power: Old age Wealth (this is noted to a certain extent, but most people assume rich outsider corrupt politicians, not that rich politicians favo…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:40 AM
8

Many people view prenuptial agreements as a sign of a lack of trust and/or an indication that those involved think it is likely that they will divorce. Either way, the person pushing for the agreement will appear to believe that the relationship is doomed, or that they anticipate bad behavior on the part of the other person. This is even true to a certain extent. We likely wouldn't be having this conversation if men weren't, at least a little, worried that the woman would betray them and take th…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:30 AM
3

Doctor BEEEEEEEeeees
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:17 AM
3

This. Also, prenuptial agreements cannot account for child support, and any agreement on alimony is only has binding as the woman allows it to be. They may still be a somewhat effective way to ensure asset division, but many (most?) judges will also ignore the agreement if the woman claims that she 'needs' more or that the division is unfair.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:10 AM
2

Where is that useless conversion bot when you need it? 5.58826459 × 10-52 cubic light years
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:11 AM
3

The short answer is no, your child support would not drop if you remarried. The longer answer is that remarrying is a change in your status and you could, theoretically, apply for a change in the support amount if this reduced your ability to pay. Realistically, you are unlikely to get a reduction, and it would likely cost you a good bit of time and money to sit through all the crap required to apply for the change. Child support is at least nominally for the child, regardless of whether any of …
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:47 PM
3

I Love Lucy?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:16 AM
3

That might help a little, but remember that consent can be withdrawn at any time, so even with such an agreement, all the accuser has to do is claim that they changed their mind, or felt pressured to sign, etc. Also, asking someone to sign a form before having sex is probably going to kill the mood.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:34 PM
2

So /u/LiteweightPhenomenal is pro men being murdered on buses? Please tell me you aren't really pretending that it's okay to kill bus drivers based on unproven accusations by unknown sources.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 11:48 AM
3

Wow. Reading articles like this makes me want to cry.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:18 AM
1

The title of your post is deceptive. Women are more likely to crash than expected, but still less likely to crash than men. Also, despite the findings, things are still pretty much like they were thought to be before, where men are more likely to crash than women. How is this related to men or mens rights?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:24 PM
4

Keep in mind we are not lawyers blah blah blah. Arrears are not going away. You have to get the support reduced before the child support is incurred. You can only get it reduced going forward. You could speak to a lawyer to get a better understanding of your options, but at this point it would likely be a lost cause. The government is making money from you so they are unlikely to help you, and the government is the one with the final say.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:10 PM
1

The way you explain it, it sounds like he was the one who started this, so I don't think there is anything for you to feel bad about. He gave you stuff without you even asking, so you weren't trading. If his gifts improved your opinion of him and led to an enjoyable relationship, then good for you and good for him. And even if you had approached him, as long as you weren't deceiving him about your intentions I wouldn't see any problem with it. It would only be if you tricked him into a relations…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:08 PM
1

From what I can tell reading your post, you are asking if it is okay to learn things from men you date. The answer is yes, it is okay. The answer is still yes even if you have sex with them. It is still okay even if their skill with whatever is what attracted you in the first place. Admiring someone's skill is fine, dating someone you admire is fine, and wanting to learn a skill they know is fine. This is true even if you have sex with them. It would only be not okay if you began to date or have…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:58 AM
1

That part is in The Other Half of the Sky (jk)
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:52 AM
2

I think I get what you're saying here, but I think we risk judging women's ability for combat thru physical fitness like a fish's ability to climb trees. Surely the trials of combat are the same regardless of gender, but it could be that we're losing out on the full potential of our armed forces just because women can't do 50 pushups. You say this, but it would be incredibly relevant to judge a fish's ability to climb trees if we are hiring people to climb trees. The fact that fish are less able…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:12 AM
2

Sperm donors also have to pay child support unless they have a contract written, agreed to and signed in advance of conception (and presumably both sides need to have legal advice available just as with prenuptial agreements), and the insemination is performed by a licensed physician. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/sperm-donor-forced-to-pay-child-support/
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:12 PM
3

I have also have this issue in the US. I see an ad for GoDaddy offering the domain for sale.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:07 AM
2

The latter. The only thing that would hint at the former is ‘Some of the brides we have spoken to are doing things that they feel make their wedding more 'feminist'. But the rest of the article just interprets how modern weddings go to be feminist and therefore calls the weddings such.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:31 PM
1

NEW DELHI: Adopting a liberal view, the Delhi high court has awarded six years imprisonment to a woman... Justice S P Garg on Wednesday reduced the seven year jail term awarded by the trial court to Shakuntala taking note of mitigating circumstances including that she has no issue and was in custody from the very beginning and has already undergone imprisonment for over three years. HC also took into account the fact she had no past history of a criminal case, she earned remissions and her overa…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:29 AM
8

Guy and friend meet up with 2 girls, who are roommates. Friend and girl #1 start to hook up in another room, but girl #2 loses her shit and starts screaming that friend is raping girl #1, despite all evidence to the contrary, including what girl #1 tells her. This all happened in a dorm, so tons of people could hear girl #2 screaming about rape.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:29 PM
3

You are forgetting three things: Only women can be raped When a man and a woman both commit a crime the man made her do it. You, apparently, are forgetting one thing. Or were there only two of these?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 12:35 AM
0

I agree with this. I feel like 'violence' of this level isn't really a problem, unless it becomes commonplace or escalates to serious danger. I've engaged in confrontations more violent than that with my siblings, and no one ever would have thought to call the police, and I think it should be the same here. My guess is that many of those who say they would consider a gal slapping a guy to be domestic violence do so mostly out of a knee-jerk reaction against the hypocrisy they see in the way thin…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:46 AM
1

I would not hire a person I liked but who was not qualified, and you wouldn't, but it happens all the time out there, and I've seen it. Especially for family members, but also for attractive people, tall people, etc. So I think likability plays a significant role, especially in deciding between applicants who are approximately equally qualified.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:48 PM
0

The OP implied that because circumcision can have horrible complications, it must not be necessary. This is false, regardless of whether circumcision is necessary or not, because even necessary treatments can have horrible consequences. I was attempting to point out the bad logic here, not comment on circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:08 AM
3

First, I am not a lawyer. Second, I don't know the specifics of your agreement, but you might try talking to her about it. She may (or may not) be understanding of your difficulties and be willing to sign a new agreement. Lastly, I would be careful about looking for ways to avoid this that don't involve her agreement. $400/month is bad, but if this went to court it could end up worse. If you want to pursue a way to get out of this agreement altogether you will want to consult with a lawyer, and …
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:02 PM
7

I would suggest NOT getting a paternity test done. The lady already cannot do anything, and so the only thing the test could do would be to screw him over.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:22 PM
-16

Right. Because there are never, ever any problems from necessary procedures, which are always performed with perfect accuracy and no complications.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:17 PM
-4

You should actually look at the story in question before contradicting others. On Oct. 25th around 4:56pm the University Police Department received a report of similar incident described in a previous Clery Release. The description of the suspect is very similar and a composite is available in a link below. The University Police Department received a report of a third degree assault that occurred in the Hitt Street Garage on the fourth floor. A female victim stated while walking up the stairs in…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:44 PM
6

203, actually, though your point still stands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)#Other_Battles_of_the_Sexes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karsten_Braasch He was well-noted for his service motion and his habit of smoking during changeovers. Braasch competed in a 'Battle of the Sexes' contest against Venus Williams and Serena Williams at the 1998 Australian Open when he was ranked 203. A decade and a half older than the sisters, Braasch "was a man whose training regime centr…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:03 AM
3

This seems relevant: http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:15 AM
1

and this is not the 90's. We use .jpg now. Out with that .jpeg crap.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:44 AM
11

Yes, but the bouncer will get in trouble if something happens and he did nothing. He will NOT get in trouble if he throws someone out and it turns out they did nothing wrong. So this has less to do with the credibility of her claims, and more to do with the incentives in a bouncer's job. Also, after-the-fact tales aren't as incredible as you might want to think. Bouncers aren't always within arm's reach when something is going down. Which isn't to say they are always true, either, but the bounce…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:10 PM
3

This one speaks the truth. If you are doing an apples-to-oranges comparison like comparing ($ men earn)/(# of men) with ($ women earn)/(# of women) or similar, then you will see numbers like that. And that sort of comparison is misleading for exactly the sort of reasons this one gave.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:48 AM
30

It's cue.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 12:05 PM
3

DEAR X and Y, AFTER your mum and dad separated they could not agree about where you were to live. You were 10 and 6 at the time. As a judge it was my job to make this decision. I had a lot of help from the lawyer who was representing you, and each of your parents, as well as an expert child psychiatrist. Even with all of this help it was a hard, sad case to decide. This letter is to try to explain my decision to you, even though you probably won’t read it for many years. The most important thing…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:08 AM
1

Original post: This guy could seriously use some advice: http://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/q6xgr/gf_lost_her_damned_mind_last_night_assaulted_me/ original post: Its been just about a year now. We've faced our share of hardships together already and I thought we were better off than this. We're poor as dirt living in a half-assed apartment that's currently half browned out. We stay because we can't afford to move. Last night I went out with some friends. The girlfriend has been…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:28 PM
6

Original post: To put it simply I live on campus at a North Carolina state school. The policy of this school is that we can sign up on the 27th to make sure that we keep out dorm room for the coming year. I showed up this morning and was told that I could not keep my room. The university decided that they were going to make my part of the hall "all female". I politely asked "so I wouldn't have to move if I was female?" and got the answer "of course sweetie." What do I do? Who do I contact? Isn't…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 06:18 PM
1

Original text: http://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/q37ow/gf_got_an_abortion_without_me_knowing/ I really don't know what to tell him and could use some help on this one. All I can suggest is he talk about boundaries and expectations. This is a huge violation of trust IMO.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:38 PM
4

I'm a single father with 50/50 custody and because of wages i'm entitled to a small sum of 50$ a month CS from the mother. I know it's laughable and i don't need or want the payments however i find it interesting that i have never received a dime from any source. It's got me thinking where do child support payments actually go? I know my previous child support payments went to the mother as there was a total of over $400 and there was mention of a received payment. However im puzzled as to how n…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:56 AM
3

Try this one
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter