TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

animalmind Archive

View 2 posts and 56 comments by animalmind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Question for RedPillanimalmind/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:00 AM
1

Discussionanimalmind/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Don't be the macho asshole, be the underdog nice guy who understands your feelings. Anybody who wants to deny that would have at least two decades of movies and television shows to answer for. Isn't this an idea, at least in movies and TV, that is perpetuated by men. Most screenwriters are men. It's a beta male fantasy.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 08:24 PM
1

I think I understand, and can appreciate, the kind of wisdom you're talking about. I haven't had any men in my life, so my communication style is modeled after woman. Woman want their feelings validated, for example. I still think there is something positive to be said about validating feelings, but not coddling those feelings. Coddling does more harm than good. I would say something to the effect of: "I see what you're going through sucks, but if you want it to not suck, you need to toughen up …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 07:02 AM
1

That's a lesson I'm learning. I had no self-efficacy.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 06:01 AM
2

I agree in a way, because I know I would be harder on a man than a woman, but I can't completely agree because I have been a little bitch, so it would be wrong of me to ignore a man that is in a similar situation.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 05:53 AM
1

I think that depends on where you've been. I'm going to help someone in some way, even if I don't respect them in the sense you're talking about, because I've been where they are at.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 05:38 AM
4

I need some clarification about the idea behind these statement... "Man up", "Don't be a pussy", "I don't give a fuck about your feelings or problems", "Suck it up, bitch". What's the logic behind these statements? What is the intended result? What's wrong with caring about someone's problems or feelings? Does caring about another's problems and feelings make me not a man? I don't aim to coddle anyone or feed into their delusions, but also don't want to be an asshole.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 02:12 AM
15

I see your point. I can't expect a type of evidence to be perfect.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:23 AM
37

This had nothing to do with the sexual assault case. It was stupid to even have it in the description if they are not going to talk about it directly. I personally wouldn't want something as inaccurate as fitbit data to be used in court. It could be just as much as a detriment to innocent people as the guilty.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:06 AM
1

I think the conclusion is wrong. Women don't hate non-natural alphas. Women hate the uncertainty. If a woman were to find out a man used a guide to seduce her, is that not creating an uncertainty about the character of the man? Is this man actually a creep? Is he lying about everything? Why would a woman not find that to be a red flag? That doesn't mean you have to be born alpha. The incriminating word is "guide", a written instruction manual to the female brain. It's a very cold, calculating, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/15 03:18 AM
1

Yes, most definitely. Any person can change to some extent. We are always going to be that core self, but we can become better versions of ourselves. What kind of change are you thinking? I think there are changes that happen on surface level, and then there are changes that go deeper and deeper and those are more difficult to change. For example, anyone can be confident on the surface, but there are deeper and deeper versions of confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:23 PM
1

Yes, you can change at any age. You have to believe you can change and want to change. If someone is "too old to change", it's because they don't believe they can or don't want to. I can definitely see myself becoming more "alpha", if that means I will become more confident, assertive, resilient and decisive. That's not completely changing my personality. I'm still going to be me. My personality is going to change states. My personality is going to go from an unhealthy state to a healthier state…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:00 PM
1

It is, but as far as broad statements go, I think it's the most accurate. We may be able to objectively conclude all the qualities of nature of both men and woman, but concluding which gender is more terrible or wonderful than the other is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 03:37 PM
1

That's true for you, okay. My opinion of a principle is a belief that's consistent. I thought you weren't consistent. I was confused, but now I understand. You have no problem with being exactly like radical feminists. That's fine, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 10:59 PM
0

women are less rational, less loyal, basically children compared to men? Where do these ideas come from? Can anyone build a case with studies? Because I am going to assume this is an attitude from personal experience and internet blogs. I can make the same assertions about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 08:52 PM
8

So TRP is filled with unprincipled hypocrites? You're acting like a victim. I get it, society can shine a positive light on woman like they can do no wrong. Women's complaints about society are equally valid. That doesn't excuse all this bullshit from both sides. Men and woman are equally wonderful and terrible in their nature. You're embellishing reality because you are bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 08:15 PM
7

It's a really interesting study, and it does support your narrative. I agree it would be naive to believe what you said was the BP narrative. We all have our natural inclinations towards behaviors that society might deem immoral. Woman are no different.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 08:40 PM
8

EDIT: This is the study: Gender Differences and Relationship Status in Infidelity You can find the study that was done on page 14.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 07:46 PM
4

The fact that 90% would date the man already in an LTR... So, are you saying you believe this 90% percent would date a man while in a LTR? I would need more information to draw this conclusion. 90% said they would go out with him. 90% didn't say they would go out with him while he was in a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 07:29 PM
2

I'm not understanding. What is your conclusion from this? Woman are more attracted when a man is perceived as scarce. How would this conflict with anyone not prescribed to TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 06:41 PM
7

I believe altruism isn't completely selfless. There might not be a tangible reward, but feeling good for doing good is a selfish reward. There is no way a person can do something without getting something, even if it's the feeling of doing "what is right". A lot of people would disagree with that, but what's important to know is being selfish isn't inherently a bad thing. I see myself as a compassionate person. I'm not an altruistic person, but I have compassion for people that would never direc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 06:59 AM
7

Interesting. I have a lot of questions. What do you think altruism is? What do you think is the difference between altruism and extensive cooperation? What do you think is the altruism that BPers push? Like what do you think they are not reflecting on?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 06:03 AM
5

What do you think causes a morality based on guilty and empathy, over an egoist philosophy? Early life experiences and possibly biology. Is there an ingrained psychology to support the collective in humanity? Partly. I think what's deeply ingrained is self-preservation, but we are also very social, and society wouldn't come as far as it has if there wasn't a preference for pro-social behavior and the development of pro-social morality. Do you favor people close to you over people you don't know?…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 05:33 AM
9

The foundation of my morality is guilt and empathy. I would like to develop more ethics around logic, but I recognize how I function is mostly emotional. I believe most people function emotionally, and may use "logic and reason" to justify these emotions. Morality built on emotions could prove to be inconsistent, because these judgments are reflexive, and the person may not be aware when they are violating their own morality. Complete awareness of your beliefs is very important. TRP simply doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 04:51 AM
2

I have done meditation and felt it's short term affects. I haven't made it a routine, though. I currently have the routine of writing down my thoughts and feelings, which has at least brought awareness to why I do what I do and what I need to work on. Plus, awareness it self seems to resolve some problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 04:03 PM
1

Before you're in a relationship? No, that would be overvaluing her. Why would she be a high priority in your life if you barely know her? She's sensing that you don't value her, but her body. It reeks of desperation. You don't go up to a stranger and talk about death and the meaning of life, do you? No, you have small talk. You talk about the weather. You talk about sports. After awhile this stranger becomes a friend you can trust, and a deeper, more complex relationship develops over time. Even…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 03:40 PM
1

That is true, you can't expect others to sort out your issues. I don't want to enter into another serious relationship until I have most of my shit sorted out. I assume the type of woman I want is going to expect more strength than I currently possess, but I also believe this woman should value my honesty, even if it might make me look weak. I'm not saying balling up into a fetal position and crying into her lap. I'm saying direct expression of emotion without exaggeration. And the thing is, I'm…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 03:02 PM
0

Good points. I see no reason not to have a tough exterior. My focus is the development of my inner-self. My outside has been stoic in most situations, but my inside has been very emotional, I would say in a very unhealthy way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 02:09 PM
1

Interesting. I'll have to look more into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:36 PM
0

He didn't make up the word. It's latin. And characteristics like empathy are not related to hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:16 PM
1

Because she does want to be valued? I need a clearer understanding of what valuing means to you. You could mean overvaluing, and I would agree with that, but right now I believe you mean undervaluing, which doesn't make sense for a relationship. You need to value something in your partner other than what she can provide for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:10 PM
1

I think there are some misunderstandings. The word ¨feminine¨ might be too loaded with other meanings. By feminine, I mean qualities that are more expected and accepted for woman than men. Empathy and compassion for example. These are great traits that aren't exclusive to woman, but to a man these could be considered weak. Men typically value competition, and empathy can be a hindrance to one's competitive edge. If a man were to be open to empathy, he wouldn't need to turn into goo, because thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:02 PM
1

I don't know the history. Is it simply because the blue pill was a reaction to the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 05:16 AM
1

Hmm, I will be rethinking compromise. I might be confusing compromise with communication. Are you saying resentment is inevitable? How should resentment be delt with?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 03:36 AM
2

It's unnatural for a man to be in a relationship with a girl who he truly values and places high on his list of priorities Then don't place her high on your list of priorities! Are you saying you go in the opposite direction and not value them completely? What the fuck do you do in relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 10:43 PM
1

Woman are attracted to men that don't NEED them. "Caring" Bob was not caring. He was needy. What do you mean by "placing any value on a girl"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 10:36 PM
2

The sex isn't the problem. Society is full of self-centered people. I know that might be fucked up to say, but whatever. I know I've been self-centered in my own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 10:17 PM
1

Okay, that's true, the nature of the problem will result in a whole baby or no baby, but I don't think that's the point. The point is the process of compromise gives respect. Forcing your demands on another creates resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 12:39 PM
1

That's possible. Blindingly optimistic is a characteristic I know I have, but I will own up to it if I'm ever proven wrong with my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 12:18 PM
2

Those can possibly be compromised, but you need to communicate and get to the root of the issue. Why do you not want a baby? Is it because you can't afford a baby? Why does she want a baby? Does she need a baby now? Can you create a plan to save for a baby for a year, and maybe see if she still wants a baby in that time? For the blow job, at least figure out why she thinks it's dirty and disgusting. Maybe there are ways to get around it, maybe not. I said Compromise, not dominate. Is anyone argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 03:51 AM
1

Why do we have the instinct to have sex? I would say having sex is important to an individuals survival, because without sex, the individual would have never existed in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 01:29 AM
1

We do have emotional reactions that are not beneficial to our biological imperatives. Laughter for example doesn't contribute to our survival. A theory of laughter is it's a relief to a perceived threat that turns out harmless. For example, if you see tall grass moving and think it's a tiger, but turns out to be a rabbit. It's a byproduct of other emotional states.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 01:02 AM
0

Many people have no interest in having children. You get that, right? Having kids is not a biological imperative, so arguing that we're "designed" to reproduce is silly. We can choose to have kids or not, but we still have biological imperative to have sex. We have evolved enough to pull out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 12:58 AM
2

Ok, I see. I agree, compromise can't work 100% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 12:21 AM
2

Oh, I didn't know this was a real situation you were describing. I should say I don't think the method is guaranteed to find a great compromise, my belief is you at least should try.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 11:59 PM
1

True, there are limitations imposed on everyone to varying degrees based on gender, class, and race. In my opinion creating a life and guiding it to a successful beginning is beautiful and more deserving of respect than the vast majority of jobs out there. Oh, I definitely agree. It's a wonderful thing. I respect anyone to a very high degree if they are good parents (I'm bias towards what I would consider would be my parenting style), and if I become a father I would rather focus on my children'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 11:48 PM
1

CRIB it Commit to seek mutual purpose Commit to stay in conversation until we come up with a solution that serves a purpose we both share. Recognize the purpose behind the strategy We confuse purpose with strategy. The dream job is a strategy. Staying where you are is a strategy. We can break the impasse and find purpose by asking others: why do you want that? When you focus on your real purpose, you open up the possibility of find alternatives that can serve mutual purpose. Invent a mutual purp…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 11:17 PM
3

Okay, so what you're saying is you can compromise, but you end up with two disappointed individuals instead of one? Making compromising pointless? My version of compromise isn't to equalize, but find a solution that works for both people. In the example of temperature, one could have the temperature set to how they want, while the other tries to create the temperature they want in their personal space, like wearing layers, a space heater, or a box fan.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 10:32 PM
3

I also want to say woman's role in the past were far more limiting than men's role. Woman can bring a lot of intellectual, social and creative value to the world, and this has been suppressed. While woman who don't live to this potential can still be respected, I can't agree that woman should have to limit their potential, or agree with society's narrative that woman are not as smart or capable as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 10:06 PM
1

I agree with all that. Despite being "individuals", we are very external focused and shallow with our identities. These identities are formed by what we do and what we consume, and what we do and consume is distracting us from ourselves. The place inside where we can find fulfillment. So, instead what we develop is the persona, like decorating a mask.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 09:27 PM
6

This is where feminism has, intentionally or not, had a negative effect on society. I would go a step further and say America's increasing values of achievement, materialism, and individualism ignited the feminist movement. When that's what is valued most, it's only a matter of time that woman feel their traditional roles are subservient rather than part of a whole. To be clear, I don't out right reject feminism, these are my observations.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 08:31 PM
3

Are you saying there are no compromises at all? This makes me believe you don't try to compromise. Give me an example of a situation that can't be compromised.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 08:18 PM
3

Okay, I think I understand. You take all considerations into account, but you draw the best conclusion and make the decision? It sounds difficult to not be bias and rationalize why what you want is best for the family.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 08:06 PM
1

For example: She wants to have one more kid. He does not. Both have good reasons for their positions. With the Captain/First mate model, how is this decision made? If being Captain means always getting what you want when there is disagreement, it's a flawed model.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 05:39 PM
3

I'm with you, modulok. I don't understand why there has to be a clearly defined "Captain". Decision making can ebb and flow to either person depending on the context. It's a relationship. Two people, not a group that needs strict leadership to function efficiently. They don't seem to understand it's more what they want, than what they need. Some desire to feel powerful and in charge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 05:01 PM
-1

Well don't we all think about how we should approach situations and people? I mean, everyone who is social has some kind of strategy to appear the way they want to appear and they use what they've got to try to persuade people. The thing is, most people want something. To some degree, but everyone is different. All I want is a connection, understand people, and be understood. What I might get out of that interaction is gravy. The point of being who you are, being authentic and honest, is attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:17 PM
25

I believe any relationship configuration is healthy and stable if there is one quality that remains equal: respect. Male "dominated", female "dominated", or egalitarian, none are inherently wrong as long as both parties are fully committed to their structure. If one person has a career, while the other stays home and takes care of their children, is this considered an unequal relationship? Is the career oriented person dominating the take care of the home person? It would only be so if one is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 03:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter