| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Women aren't living quite as many years longer than men. Feminists outragedYes, my full-time job is pretty terrible. After all, I have to sit on my ass in an air-conditioned office and think about shit. For 40 whole hours per week! I really don't know how I manage; it's pretty traumatic. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 12:00 PM |
| 1 | Women aren't living quite as many years longer than men. Feminists outragedYes, my full-time job is pretty terrible. After all, I have to sit on my ass in an air-conditioned office and think about shit. For 40 whole hours per week! I really don't know how I manage; it's pretty traumatic. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 11:59 AM |
| 0 | Women aren't living quite as many years longer than men. Feminists outragedThe point isn't "We've all got it rough; let's sit in a circle and talk about how awesome we are!" I actually think it's kind of the opposite. The point is that someone being in one marginalized group does not mean they can't be privileged in another way. Conversely, just because the commenter is in a privileged group with respect to race and class does not mean she can't be marginalized in another way, or that she loses her ability to call other people out on their privilege. She still might be… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 11:45 AM |
| 4 | Women aren't living quite as many years longer than men. Feminists outragedOppression Olympics much? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 01:44 AM |
| 7 | Chivalry is actually 'benevolent sexism', feminists concludeI'm pretty sure the feminist psychologists in this article were actually arguing exactly the opposite of this. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/11 11:43 AM |
| 7 | Chivalry is actually 'benevolent sexism', feminists concludeWell... in some instances it kind of is. Take the example from the article of 'helping a woman to choose the right computer'. (I'm female.) I'm a software engineer, I did tech support in college, and I drool over pics and specs of expensive gaming PCs on the internet. But I still get Best Buy employees who feel the need to explain to me in great detail what an Ethernet cord looks like or how to choose a power supply, and I don't see that happening to guys I've dated. Obviously, if a woman who do… | /r/MensRights | 15/06/11 11:42 AM |
| 1 | Mother starves her children, gets life. "In his closing argument, defense attorney James Jamison portrayed Abneris Santiago as a victim of domestic violence."This didn't work, either. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/10 08:56 PM |
| 2 | Ellis: "Why be with a woman who thinks of you as an oppressor but treats you like a servant?"I, too, enjoy making shit up about how TOTALLY AWESOME I am. Did you know I'm the president of SUPER MENSA? I also have three Ph.Ds from MIT and I had sex with your mother. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/10 01:52 PM |
| 1 | War Propaganda: Let's send more men to die in Afghanistan because of "women's rights"Ah, sorry. I thought you were talking about ad hominem the logical fallacy, not ad hominem the colloquialism used to insult your opponent's argumentative skill when you've run out of actual arguments. My bad. Edit: merriam webster also defines 'feminist' as the belief in equality between the sexes: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminist Good thing that's more reliable than Wikipedia. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 08:38 PM |
| 2 | War Propaganda: Let's send more men to die in Afghanistan because of "women's rights"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem_attack He wasn't saying we shouldn't listen to jayhammers because he hates women. He was just saying that jayhammers hates women. See the difference? | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 08:21 PM |
| 2 | War Propaganda: Let's send more men to die in Afghanistan because of "women's rights"He didn't say "jayhammers is a knuckle dragger; therefore his opinion is invalid". That would be ad hominem. He said that jayhammers put "women's rights" in quotes; therefore he is a knuckle dragger. This is not ad hominem, it's just a garden variety insult. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 07:27 PM |
| 3 | Ellis: "Why be with a woman who thinks of you as an oppressor but treats you like a servant?"Hah, I know. I just like to pick on him sometimes, when it's a slow day at work. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 06:58 PM |
| 6 | Ellis: "Why be with a woman who thinks of you as an oppressor but treats you like a servant?"Um, I think people should masturbate to whatever the fuck turns them on. Masturbation never hurt anyone. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 04:55 PM |
| 1 | User Feedback, what's your opinion on the MensRights Reddit? Does it represent the men's movement as you know it?I don't think she was talking about comments like "get back in the kitchen woman". I think she was talking about comments like "All feminists just hate men", or the comments that blame feminism for everything from circumcision to prison rape to divorce. Or, at least, those are the comments that bother me when I read this reddit. Bad things have been done in the name of feminism, there are feminists who genuinely hate men, and the feminists who argue that you MUST be a feminist or else you think … | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 04:16 PM |
| 3 | Has Men's Rights been taken over by feminists? This is a men's forum, but the downvoting of posts that question feminist double standards, feminist theory or propaganda is very consistent.How do downvotes make this forum "unsafe"? | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 03:14 PM |
| 12 | Has Men's Rights been taken over by feminists? This is a men's forum, but the downvoting of posts that question feminist double standards, feminist theory or propaganda is very consistent.Kloo, we're back to banning dissenters again? | /r/MensRights | 01/08/10 02:23 PM |
| 4 | Brown University Researcher Proposes Financial AbortionFTA: A year after President Obama launched his "fatherhood initiative" to address the problems facing 23 million children in America living without their dads, one researcher thinks she can do the president one better with a controversial new plan. The researcher is a woman. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/10 01:59 AM |
| 4 | For 'sexting' pictures of 17 year old girlfriend, three 18-19 year old men will be charged with "possessing obscene materials and child pornography".This happens. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/10 11:36 PM |
| 1 | Female teacher (41) will avoid jail time after pleading guilty to sending nude photos to Boy (15).Right. I think, in this case, we need to punish men less, rather than punishing this woman more. There are a lot of possible scenarios in which men and women are equal--perhaps anyone who sends an explicit picture to a minor could be burned alive. But, in my opinion, this policy would definitely be worse than the one we have now, even though the punishment for men and women would be equal. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/10 05:55 PM |
| 2 | Female Battering is No Joke!I wasn't talking about the methodology of the study, I was wondering why the author was including these diagnoses in the article. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/10 01:33 AM |
| 2 | Female Battering is No Joke!Yikes. My only point of contention: is the author trying to suggest that the men in the study somehow got ADHD, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder from being abused by their female partners? Depression, anxiety disorders, those make sense. But ADHD? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 11:28 PM |
| 1 | With regard to Male vs Female circumcision: "Right, except that one causes a shitload of problems and lifelong issues and pain and the other does not."Okay, make it a small irreversible change then. Say a cut that caused a tiny scar. My point still stands. I wasn't arguing that it wouldn't be better if the foot stomping or the pin prick didn't happen, or that stomping on feet or pin pricking shouldn't both be illegal. I was arguing that it's ridiculous to claim that we can't draw a distinction between foot stomping and foot amputation because both violate the same right. If one causes more harm than the other, then that one is worse. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 06:18 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEIf we have an agreement that any pregnancy will be aborted, she can void that agreement at any time without my consent, and then take half my income for a very long time. I think this is unfair. I'd definitely be in favor of men and women being able to make an agreement, pre-pregnancy, that any future pregnancy will be aborted or the man will not have to pay. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 02:57 AM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEhttp://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1863#comic | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 05:03 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEMassachusetts. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:52 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEThe problem I see with this approach is it's likely to result in a lot more children. "Sure, I'll have another kid as long as it doesn't cost me anything!" | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:38 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEAnd the people have an interest in a government that does what they want. Your comment seems to be implying that the people have no control over the government's interests, which is, at least, not true where I live. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:32 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEHey, at least you're consistent. Have an upvote. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:30 PM |
| 1 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEI'm not sure I understand your point... We're talking about women who won't abort, since if the woman were going to have an abortion, there would be no baby for the father to relinquish his rights and responsibilities to. So, if you have sex with a woman who will abort, there's no risk for either of you. If you're having sex with a woman who won't abort, there's a risk for both of you. This still isn't fair in that the woman is the only person who decides whether or not she will abort. But there… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:25 PM |
| 1 | [Men DV victims] calling the police doesn’t always help either. That's because when a man calls the police to report domestic violence, statistics show that police are three times more likely to arrest him - even if he’s the victim!Never ever, under any circumstances? | /r/MensRights | 27/07/10 03:14 PM |
| -2 | A Man's Right to Choose? - TIMEExactly. If the man who was 50% responsible for creating the baby doesn't pay his half, the government will likely have to do it instead. That's not more fair. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/10 07:35 PM |
| 1 | With regard to Male vs Female circumcision: "Right, except that one causes a shitload of problems and lifelong issues and pain and the other does not."Which is why 'medical' circumcision and FGM are different and it doesn't make sense to compare them... | /r/MensRights | 26/07/10 07:23 PM |
| 0 | With regard to Male vs Female circumcision: "Right, except that one causes a shitload of problems and lifelong issues and pain and the other does not."This argument leads to an absurd conclusion. If every violation of the "human right to bodily integrity" is as bad as any other and deserves equal consideration, stomping on someone else's foot is as bad as, and deserves equal consideration as, cutting off someone else's foot. Put another way, suppose there was a law that said the parents of a son had the choice either to circumcise him or to 'symbolically' circumcise him by using a needle to draw a drop of blood from his penis. According to you… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/10 07:21 PM |
| 3 | Overcrowding and DUI in LA: Most women only serve 20% of their jail sentence. Until last week, male inmates served 80% of their jail time, but recently the sheriff's department began freeing men who were sentenced for non-violent offenses after they served only 50% of their time.It doesn't say why the women serve less of their sentences than men. Maybe people generally get out earlier for certain types of crimes, and women commit those crimes more often than men do. Maybe the women's prisons are more overcrowded than the men's prisons are. Or maybe it's discrimination. But the article doesn't give us a reason to assume it's gender discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/10 05:53 PM |
| 1 | Does marriage reduce a woman to property? (cross-post from fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu, of all places)People who make outrageous claims should cite them. If you know something is true, it's generally pretty easy for you to find the place you learned it. So it makes a lot more sense for someone to say "citation needed" than "go look it up yourself". | /r/MensRights | 12/07/10 03:45 PM |
| 1 | Stop helping boys, says equality watchdog (from r/equality)Eh. The sexes are different, on average, in the way they learn, but they're definitely not "separate, homogeneous groups". For example, some girls have stereotypically male learning styles, and some boys have stereotypically female learning styles. So if the reforms they're criticizing actually are trying to treat all girls the same and all boys the same, they might have a point. Then again, there is this: The report, by academics at Roehampton University, blames gender stereotyping by parents a… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/10 03:36 PM |
| 2 | The remains of US-born chess champion Bobby Fischer have been exhumed in Iceland to establish a paternity claim.Indeed. His remains are not going to care what happens to them, and if the child is not his daughter, the DNA test will show that. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/10 01:31 PM |
| 1 | Wikipedia allows 'girl gamer' article but deletes 'guy gamer' article as hoax.Eh. I'm a girl, and I'm a gamer. That makes grammatical sense. On the other hand, I could not be a "fireman". I think the issue is more that the overwhelming majority of gamers are male, and the overwhelming majority of games are made for an audience assumed to be male, so the "gamer" article applies mostly to them. The "Girl gamer" article is probably supposed to be about the minority of gamers that are women, and the games that are marketed specifically to them. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/10 01:02 AM |
| 1 | DAE find arguing with a feminist so....exhausting?Duh, there's totally evidence. Some of these posters have similar opinions. What more evidence do you need? | /r/MensRights | 01/07/10 12:55 AM |
| 1 | Any given pretty woman could be a Russian spy.You don't have to worry about ugly women though. Those are fine. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 11:34 PM |
| 1 | DAE find arguing with a feminist so....exhausting?So everyone who disagrees with you is the same person? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 09:29 PM |
| 1 | DAE find arguing with a feminist so....exhausting?lolwut | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 08:49 PM |
| 0 | Crosspost: Woman wishes she aborted her teenage son because, surprise, he's a teenage boy. (Screencap)Guys, this is from 2007 and is only noteworthy because /b/ found out about it. If you're gonna be Anonymous, at least try and stay current. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 07:19 PM |
| -2 | DAE find arguing with a feminist so....exhausting?When I see a commenter make continuously moronic posts, I simply don't respond, downvote when they say something dumb, and upvote on the rare occasions when they say something worthwhile. I really don't see what making posts about their comments that you disagree with is accomplishing. If that happened to me, I would laugh and show everyone I knew. Probably not the response you're looking for. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 07:09 PM |
| 1 | Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 MillionThe population of the world is already too much and is unsustainable. People should stop having kids. Because people have kids for the good of the species/planet, not because of a biological imperative. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 05:30 PM |
| 1 | Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 MillionThis is why our court system is ridiculous. This was decided out of court: The divorce terms are being worked out privately and when everything is finished it will be filed in court, the first source said. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 05:29 PM |
| -2 | Why Is It Legal to Charge Men More for Car Insurance?There's a reason they call it "anecdata". Because it's not actually data. Your experience with your family and friends has nothing to do with which gender costs more to insure, or with whether that justifies charging that gender more for insurance. While driving history, and points on license can regulate the at-risk drivers, they should weight it more on your driving history and less on gender. The only "profit shift" would be for first time offenders of either gender. Agreed. Don't they alread… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Winning the war against menMy point was that I think it'll be harder to convince people not to get married than it would be to try to get unfair laws changed. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/10 01:23 AM |
| 5 | Winning the war against menEvery human society ever has had a form of marriage. Some are polygamous, some are monogamous, but men have always been "willing" to marry women. The feminist movement has not made the gains it has because someone managed to convince women to stop getting married or having sex with men. Men need to do what women did and do: advocate, vote, and SUE. Whether or not Republicans (or Democrats, for that matter) have, up until now, done anything to advance men's rights is irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/10 03:12 PM |
| -2 | So...misandry is totally OK in sex toy advertising...? (Crossposted from WTF).I take it back. The "Who needs a man..." thing is pretty ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/10 02:50 AM |
| 5 | So...misandry is totally OK in sex toy advertising...? (Crossposted from WTF).The only thing I found disturbing about this was the "ages 3 and up". Where's the misandry? | /r/MensRights | 28/06/10 02:38 AM |
| 4 | Given that /mr is occasionally accused of being racist, I encourage everyone here to upvote this submission.I thought, upon first seeing that, that White Rights was a (lame) joke. Then I realized, with creeping horror, that they were serious... | /r/MensRights | 28/06/10 12:31 AM |
| 1 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).I'm not trying to control anyone; I just think that in a group dedicated to resisting sexism against men, we should try not to be sexist against women, to avoid massive amounts of hypocrisy. Obviously, he is free to say whatever he wants, and I am free to disagree. That's not 'control'. Are you saying that his claim is not sexist? | /r/MensRights | 27/06/10 04:36 PM |
| 2 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).If they're friends? Unless this is a really suggestive arm grab, I think most women would be fine with one of their friends (someone they don't have a problem touching) grabbing their arm. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 08:54 PM |
| 1 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).OH wait, its one of atomicparrots 345 reddit accounts, user: anon781 Lol. you are a sad sad loser. What did I lose? | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 07:06 PM |
| 1 | Male Studies FAQThere was no information in this article... | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 06:30 PM |
| 5 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).I think you should be re-banned from commenting on /r/MensRights. You continue to add absolutely nothing of value. Following someone around and calling them a troll, OTOH, is a valuable contribution without which MR could not continue. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:40 PM |
| 3 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).Do you think wikipedia is not a good source for basic facts like the definition of primary and secondary sex characteristics? This isn't rocket science... | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:38 PM |
| 4 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).Jezebel? I think it's more for teenage girls than for intelligent adults... | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:20 PM |
| 0 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).And here we have a display of good, old-fashioned sexism. You know, 100% of disagreements between women are REALLY about who is better looking! It's scientifically proven to be impossible for women to form opinions by reasoning. That's something only men like corpseflower can do. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:18 PM |
| 2 | www.Jezebel.com: "Why shameless objectification can be a good thing." - but only when it happens to men (because we don't mind).You'd be pretty grossed out if you found out a foot fetishist was giving you a foot massage and enjoying it in a profoundly sexual way, would you not? I wasn't aware there was any other way to understand someone giving you a foot massage... | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:07 PM |
| -2 | Male Studies FAQOne fundamental question of Male Studies is whether there are essential features of being male. Having a male body is clearly one of them. Does this look transphobic to anyone else? | /r/MensRights | 26/06/10 05:03 PM |
| 1 | Vagina DiscountJudge Brian Forster said: "In view of the fact that the defendant has no available assets I make a nominal finding in the sum of £1." | /r/MensRights | 25/06/10 06:59 PM |
| 3 | Why Men Cheat - Weighing the Reasons of Male InfidelityI'm pretty sure a 12-year-old could write a better article than this... According to The Truth About Cheating by M. Gary Neuman, the infidelity of men is rarely caused by sexual factors. In his research, which surveyed 100 men in 48 states, it was found that very few men actually engage in sexual activities the first time they meet the “other woman.” Only six percent start their relationship through sex, meaning the two individuals engaged in this forbidden relationship take the time to get to k… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/10 04:03 AM |
| 3 | Why Men Cheat - Weighing the Reasons of Male InfidelityI think it is well documented that women cheat more than men Citation needed. Not saying it's not true, but I also haven't heard that it is. a females desire to cheat is rooted in a si\ubconcious desire to bare a child with the most viable DNA, and sometimes that means going behind the back of the "provider" male. Perhaps. But then why wouldn't a male's desire to cheat be rooted in a subconscious desire to have more children? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/10 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Kids of lesbians have fewer behavioral problemsTrack down those sources; I'm interested. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/10 01:42 AM |
| 1 | What is 'abusegate?'Abusegate: a terrible term for a very real problem. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 06:46 PM |
| 7 | All men are pedophiles. . . That attitude could end up being our cash cow. Just like Sexual Harassment lawsuits are to women.Charity Navigator is a good site. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 06:38 PM |
| 2 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?My real point with that was allowing the woman a way to contest the adoption of the child by the father if she truly believed him to be an unfit parent. I also believe that men should have this right. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?Because the choice isn't between her and him, it's between him and a person who is qualified. If there were a way to require all prospective parents to demonstrate that they are capable of raising children, I'd support that. My real point with that was allowing the woman a way to contest the adoption of the child by the father if she truly believed him to be an unfit parent. I also believe that men should have this right. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 05:41 PM |
| 2 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?Just asking a question to clarify, not stating my beliefs. But okay: If the woman is giving the child up for adoption, I think the father should have the 'right of first refusal', as long as he can meet any legal qualifications for adoptive parents that exist where they live. However, I do think the woman should be able to abort without the consent of the father, since it's growing in her body. If there were a way to remove it and grow it elsewhere, causing the woman inconvenience comparable to … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 05:30 PM |
| 2 | Why do women complain about men? Is there a femiminity crisis?The complaint that men have displaced women is a poor means of escaping the consequence of what they have asked for. AFAIK, there is no such complaint. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 05:00 PM |
| 3 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?Do you mean that men should have the right to prevent a woman pregnant with their children from getting an abortion? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 04:56 PM |
| 1 | Lessons On Domestic Violence For 5 Year Olds - How Feminists Do Education (demonize boys before kindergarten)Petty, and not that funny. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 04:48 PM |
| 3 | Kids of lesbians have fewer behavioral problemsAs you can see, there have been a lot of serious, respected studies which clearly correlate fatherlessness to a wide range of problems with children. Right, but these are talking about single-parent homes versus homes with a mother and a father. The lesbian parents study is looking at homes with two female parents versus homes with a male and a female parent. And the results seem to be that two women aren't automatically worse parents than a man and a woman, just as I expect two men wouldn't aut… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 04:46 PM |
| 3 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?That has been debunked pretty thoroughly. For example, the American Cancer Society does not consider abortion to be correlated with, or a risk factor for, breast cancer. However, opponents to abortion like to hang on to the idea anyway, reasoning that if telling women that they will get breast cancer stops them from murdering their children, it's the right thing to do. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 04:05 PM |
| 2 | In praise of pro-feminist fathersI've read this about twenty times, and I still have no idea what you're saying. Other than that you disagree, I mean. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 04:01 AM |
| 2 | Why do women complain about men? Is there a femiminity crisis?Hmm, I didn't think of that, thanks! It's not as if the women are complaining that men are taking womens' place though. Sounds more like "adhere to your stereotype!" Not that that makes it any better of course. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 03:53 AM |
| 2 | In praise of pro-feminist fathersWow! A rare admission. It'd be rarer if I were actually a feminist, rather than just some random redditor who happened to disagree with you :) When will feminists be content with agendas that help women without hurting men, such as your example? I'd guess the feminists who hate men wouldn't ever be, unless they formed a female separatist society, and the reasonable feminists already are. The reasonable ones will be offended that you're attacking them, and the man-hating ones won't listen to you … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 03:20 AM |
| 3 | Why do women complain about men? Is there a femiminity crisis?Not completely, but I've also never seen a woman complain that men act like women, while I have seen men complain that women act like men. So I'm assuming the OP's goal was to talk about how 2X hates men or how women like to complain or how feminism is evil, all of which have been done more times than I care to remember. The 2X discussion did have some "stupid whiny men" stupidity, but there was also discussion of men's issues. I hardly think this is a call to discuss women's issues. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 02:53 AM |
| 2 | Shhhh, the women are fighting among themselves about who's a real feminist and who's better and who's hair looks stupid. There's a lot of very ugly name calling, shaming and put-downs. If we're very quiet we can sneak out the back before they notice and turn on us again. Anybody not see this coming?What does this have to do with men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 02:22 AM |
| 2 | In praise of pro-feminist fathersSome aspects of feminism harm men, but "feminism" also encompasses things that don't harm men, like ensuring women's access to birth control/abortions. Talking about how "feminism" is evil instead of specific issues just alienates people who associate feminism with its positive aspects. It also seems to make people think the critiquer of feminism is a right-wing Christian who thinks women should get back in the kitchen. At least it made the author of this blog think that... | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 02:09 AM |
| 0 | Why do women complain about men? Is there a femiminity crisis?I can't tell if you're serious or not... Edit: Also, I'd think inane more than insane. Is there any possible response to this thread OTHER than a circlejerk? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 01:45 AM |
| 2 | In praise of pro-feminist fathersIt's comments like this one that give blog posts like that their material. He was complaining that men's rights groups tend to focus on hating feminism more than they focus on actually helping men. Good job being part of the problem. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 12:59 AM |
| 8 | Why lying thrill-seekers appeal to womenYes, it would make sense that men who try to have sex more have more sex. I have no idea why they titled the article that way. It said nothing about why women are attracted to them, only that men with the "dark triad" are prone to have more brief affairs, and thus more partners, than men without. Also: these traits may have an innate, genetic component that explains why some men seem unable to stop themselves behaving badly. OH NOES IT'S MY GENES! Some men may have a stronger genetic predisposit… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 12:52 AM |
| 4 | Why lying thrill-seekers appeal to womenI hate when people resort to explaining things through evolution. Ugh, I know! As if there could be a biological basis for human behavior.... | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 12:45 AM |
| 4 | Why do women complain about men? Is there a femiminity crisis?I'm guessing this is a parody of a similar post in 2X? Anyway: Does anyone else think this is complete insanity? Yes. /thread | /r/MensRights | 24/06/10 12:43 AM |
| 2 | Bias Against Men and Boys in Mental Health Research [video] (from /r/MaleStudies)See the "other discussions" tab at the top? | /r/MensRights | 23/06/10 04:39 PM |
| 2 | One successful woman's take on feminismI disagree, but I also lol'd. Downboat or upboat? So confused... | /r/MensRights | 22/06/10 03:04 PM |
| 2 | New SubReddit: r/CounterFeminismI think it's fine to have some critiques of feminism in MensRights, when they're applicable to a men's rights issue, but why not also have a place that's specifically for discussing the flaws of feminism? Different posters here have different views on feminism; some users consider themselves feminists, while others' favorite topic is why feminism is ruining society. Perhaps the latter would like a place to discuss that idea specifically? (Of course, they can still post here too.) | /r/MensRights | 22/06/10 02:57 PM |
| 1 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"...what? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/10 12:36 AM |
| 2 | One successful woman's take on feminismAww, it's forbidden. I was hoping to generate some lulz, jayhammers style. But I'm guessing faster trolls got there first. Trolling aside, it would be nice to have a place to move all the antifeminism posts (like this one), so the people who actually want to discuss men's rights instead of Why Feminism is Bad could discuss that here, and the others could go there. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 09:49 PM |
| 2 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"Haven't you ever wondered why you keep hearing conflicting information in an age that prizes the scientific method? How scientific inquiry can so easily result in polarized results? Different methods of different studies. Similar studies studying slightly different things. Social science studying things that don't exist at all. And yes, bias. common sense is a protective refuge I assume I'm just as biased, on average, as a scientist or organization funding science, and my pretheoretical intuitio… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 09:35 PM |
| 2 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"I wrote out a beautiful response, but Firefox crashed :( Here's the less well-written Cliff's Notes version: The fact that economic models are notoriously bad for predicting the future does not disprove descriptive science. Even economics, which is not necessarily a science, can describe what's happening in the economy currently. You are using common sense to reason from a general societal model (the promotion of promiscuity) to the specific (false paternity rates). The study is simply looking a… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 09:22 PM |
| 2 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"Common sense is a dangerous thing. It can be very, very wrong. For example, it was common sense that the earth was flat for a very, very long time. But let's go ahead and use common sense. Common sense tells me that a study done by social scientists and published in a science news magazine is more believable than an experiment done by a class of high school students. Common sense also tells me that study is more reliable than a handwavy explanation about society promoting promiscuity from some r… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 08:59 PM |
| 2 | One successful woman's take on feminismKloo? He does have a bit of a knee-jerk feminists-are-always-wrong mentality, but he cares about men's rights and he's willing to actually argue his points. There are a few people who seem to care way more about bashing women/feminism than they do about men's rights, but I wouldn't say Kloo is one of them. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 08:17 PM |
| 1 | One successful woman's take on feminismIt's mostly a few posters. You learn to identify and ignore them after awhile... | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 08:06 PM |
| 1 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentI read that article and couldn't understand why anyone would rape a baby, until it got to the part where it said there is a popular belief that sex with a virgin cures AIDS. Whoever started that rumor should die in some particularly painful way. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 06:50 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentThat study was an ethnography that aimed to "gain an understanding of the circumstances and contexts of violence in young people’s sexual relationships." It was not meant to generate representative statistics about rape. This study(PDF), which I believe is the study quoted in the article, asked men if they had raped "when a woman didn’t consent to sex, was forced or when she was too drunk to stop them." And 27.6% of the interviewed men said they had, according to this criterion. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 06:25 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentMy evidence was in the article. Your turn! | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 06:01 PM |
| 3 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentYou're pointing out the flaws of unrelated studies done in a completely different country. If you think the survey quoted in the article is flawed, please read the survey and comment on its flaws, rather than assuming it must be wrong because it doesn't support your position. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 05:53 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentJudges can't un-infect someone. Yes, this is imperfect, but if this does more good by protecting women from HIV than it does harm to men, I feel it's a good thing. If it ended up that a significant number of women were using this device to hurt men, I'd support restriction of the device or stronger punishments against women who do so. But this device is being used in South Africa, where rape and HIV rates are much higher than they are here. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 05:50 PM |
| 4 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentThe article quoted a women's advocate, but the stats themselves weren't from her. They were from the South African Medical Research Council, which doesn't seem to be an activist group. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 05:04 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentIn the case of rape, I would prefer the rapist experiences some pain than the victim gets HIV. It is interesting that the device was designed to cause pain, though. If that were to become a significant deterrent for rapists, it would probably be a good thing, but assuming it isn't, this is a downside of the device. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 04:56 PM |
| 4 | One successful woman's take on feminismI was thinking of the Western first world, yes. Thanks for the correction. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 04:46 PM |
| 7 | One successful woman's take on feminismShe's definitely right that some people cry sexism to excuse incompetence. But I think she's partially missed the point of feminism: Do you really need backing from a large group to make your feelings valid. Too much of feminism today seems to be about validating women's feelings, but feminism is not necessarily just about that. Feminists helped get women the vote and secure access to birth control and abortions, to name two. And she definitely is talking about feminism in history, not just the … | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 03:45 PM |
| 1 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentA poster in the TwoX discussion of the CNN article made a good point: that the condom prevents the rapist from ejaculating inside the victim (the condom itself apparently does not draw blood), thus reducing her likelihood of getting HIV. In South Africa, where rape and HIV are both very common, this could be important for disease prevention. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 03:35 PM |
| 2 | I've come to the realization that I'm an anti-male bigot...even though I'm a guy.Ahhh... thanks :) | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 02:27 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentIt doesn't prove anything, just as the word of the woman doesn't (or, at least, shouldn't be able to) prove that rape occurred. It can, however, certainly be evidence, just as the woman's testimony can be evidence. The only situation I see in which an innocent man could end up being investigated for rape due to one of these is a situation in which a malicious woman tricked him into having consensual sex while wearing one. (If the woman just forgot she was wearing it, I'd assume she'd explain tha… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 02:26 PM |
| 3 | I've come to the realization that I'm an anti-male bigot...even though I'm a guy.I'm glad someone else thought that too; I thought I might just be crazy. (Where did that 'p' come from?) | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 02:16 PM |
| 2 | Doctor selling female condom with "teeth" isn't peddling a useful crime prevention device, she's hawking radical feminist empowermentI agree with the criticism that it's unlikely to help rape victims--I imagine a rapist who was "incapacitated" by one of these devices would be likely to severely injure or kill his victim in anger--but I don't think "women could use it maliciously, so it shouldn't be legal" is a good argument. The same thing could be said about guns or pepper spray. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 01:17 PM |
| 4 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"The 30% figure you're referencing apparently, from this article, was found by high school students; they compared their blood types to those of their parents. I don't think it's fair to compare this data with the data in the linked study. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 12:47 PM |
| 4 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"Do you have a link? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 03:00 AM |
| 13 | It's all kicking off on reddit, and the women aren't happyMore stupid reddit drama. The more everyone ignores it, the quicker it will go away. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 01:12 AM |
| 8 | "The paternity myth: the rarity of cuckoldry"Exactly how is this anti-men? Would an article that said that false paternity was higher than previously thought be pro-men? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 01:10 AM |
| 3 | 2xc is never sexist.I have a personal policy of downvoting every post that contains "I'm gonna get downvoted for this, but..." Just say it. Downvotes are not actually fatal. If people disagree with you, they'll either have terrible arguments and you'll laugh at them, or they'll have good arguments and you'll learn something. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 11:32 PM |
| 1 | Toy Story 3 is anti men. Read on ...I'm not a feminist, and I haven't seen a disney movie in years. It was my favorite when I was little. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 11:13 PM |
| 5 | 2xc is never sexist.I think there's sexism on both sides. A lot of these threads are started by "nice guys" themselves, or by women reporting their experiences with self-described nice guys. These guys tend to believe that all women are heartless bitches who want a hypermasculine man, just as the women tend to believe that all guys who get friend-zoned are manipulative assholes who only think about sex. What I find most disheartening is the amount of upvotes these threads get, even when it's the fifth one in a week… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 03:29 PM |
| 4 | 2xc is never sexist.To be fair, I do think s/he was misinterpreting the comic, which was a man who did not look at Medusa's face because she had nice boobs. It definitely wasn't saying the man was stupid. I think the highest rated reply to his/her comment is very fair. There definitely were some ridiculous replies to it though (like this one). | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 03:22 PM |
| 2 | Do you want gender equality? Take the test.It doesn't have to be "the majority makes the decisions" either. In much of history, and still to some extent today, it's "the people with the most money make the decisions" or "the people with hereditary power make decisions" or "the people with the best weapons make decisions". | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 03:13 PM |
| 2 | Do you want gender equality? Take the test.Reddit is, of course, a perfect model for the United States government. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Officer falsely accused of molesting daughter released from jail (false accusations used as weapons).What if the child had an expensive medical condition? Or what if there were multiple children? Or what if both parents agreed that the child should go to a very expensive school? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 04:15 AM |
| 3 | Do you want gender equality? Take the test.The process for amending the Constitution is quite a bit more complicated than the process for changing laws in ways not affected by the Constitution. Amendments are first proposed by a 2/3 majority in both houses of Congress, then ratified by 3/4 of the states. To date there have only been 17 ratified constitutional amendments since the Bill of Rights. So this requires more than just majority support. But my point was, as evidenced by the Bill of Rights, that America was partially founded on th… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 02:34 AM |
| 3 | Military Fights to Halt Rising Suicide RateI have never seen any evidence at all that any officials intend to make any changes whatsoever to the family law policies that have created this problem. What would the military do about this, exactly? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 02:15 AM |
| 1 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)To each their own. Indeed. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 02:10 AM |
| 3 | Do you want gender equality? Take the test.but there's really not much you can do if the majority doesn't want the minority to be able to do anything Well, there's this thing called the Constitution, for starters. Even if the majority decided they didn't want, say, freedom of speech anymore, it would still be Constitutionally protected. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 02:08 AM |
| 9 | Do you want gender equality? Take the test.I'm not sure how I feel about number 7, as it applies to education. There is quite a bit of evidence that boys and girls learn differently and need different modes of instruction. I'm not sure if that's covered in what you meant, but I don't think education should necessarily be the same for boys and girls, especially in elementary school. As far as 5, why should a false accusation (of any crime) automatically be punished the same is the original crime? If a false accusation of murder, for examp… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 02:07 AM |
| 1 | Officer falsely accused of molesting daughter released from jail (false accusations used as weapons).I could imagine a situation in which it was. I don't have enough information from this article to know whether I think it is in this situation. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/10 12:44 AM |
| 1 | Officer falsely accused of molesting daughter released from jail (false accusations used as weapons).I don't know what the area she lives in is like, but I live in a 3-bedroom apartment in a working-class neighborhood and our rent is almost $2000/month. I guess it would be possible to take care of myself and 2 kids on $700/month, but I wouldn't guess she doesn't need to work. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/10 06:25 PM |
| -2 | Toy Story 3 is anti men. Read on ...Do you also complain about the Disney movies that are sexist against women? (Example: The Jungle Book has Mowgli running around the forest with his animal friends, while the girl he sees at the end of the book lives with her parents and sings a song about taking care of the home while her husband is out working.) Otherwise, you sound just like the radfems who cry sexism about everything. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/10 02:28 PM |
| 0 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)It might shock you, but not all men and women are as stereotypical as the ones you see on TV. There do exist passive-aggressive men. Saying that obviously the author is at fault because only women are passive-aggressive is a ridiculous argument. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 10:43 PM |
| 6 | Sexist Reddit? "A modded place to gather anti-female comments and submissions [...]" "Exposing reddit's anti-female streak." It's only sexist if it's anti-female?I guess s/he could have called it Sexist (Against Women) Reddit. I do think there are more anti-female posts than anti-male posts on most of reddit (gender war zones notwithstanding), since most of reddit is male. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 08:32 PM |
| 2 | suspicious wives make the best internet spies?WTF? "How to invade your guy's privacy: Ten Easy Steps!" | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 06:09 PM |
| 1 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)I don't think it's always clingy to be best friends with your partner, but how much do you really know about a person you've only known for eight months? At least for me--maybe OP and his girlfriend are different--eight months is still the "infatuation phase", where I still think everything about my partner is wonderful and special and his farts smell like roses. So if someone told me, after 8 months, that I was his best friend, that would be a problem for me, since I would personally not be abl… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 04:25 PM |
| 0 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)That would be awesome, actually. I love cats. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 04:00 PM |
| 2 | The Difference Between Matriarchy and PatriarchyI want to say he got trolled, but sadly I'm inclined to believe it... | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 03:26 PM |
| 0 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)We're going on three years. It's the trolling that keeps us close... | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 03:19 PM |
| -12 | Her Secret to Marriage? "Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You" (Note: She's now divorced)She is my best friend. After 8 months? I'd think a guy was pretty clingy if he told me that... | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 03:02 PM |
| 5 | New Video Game Lets Women Murder Men, to Feminist ApplauseI disagree with him about the game--it's a game, people--but I love his analysis of Laurie Penny's article. I agree with her that strangers who tell you to smile are annoying and rude, but not homicidal-rage-worthy. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 02:25 PM |
| 2 | PZ Myers again: Seven paragraphs about isolated, female alleged genital mutilation, and not one word about the millions of boys victimized yearly.FWIW, it is quite annoying when people insist that we can't talk about FGM without talking about circumcision, or circumcision without FGM. But: This one is for all the hormonal little guys who need a place to hold hands and cry together. Hormonal? To me, this sounds like he's insulting men by comparing them to women (who of course are always crazy and hormonal). I'm pretty sure he offended everyone there. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 02:02 PM |
| 2 | Is female dominance a success for feminism?what | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 11:34 AM |
| 1 | Falsely accused woman sues her accusers, her employer, and the sheriff.Technically he's a spelling Nazi, I think. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 11:29 AM |
| 0 | Unfair gender roles (comic)I'm not sure how "a patriarchal society hurts men too" translates to "it's the MAN's fault because of his PENIS!" Please explain. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Women suing telecommunications giant for exposing her infidelityThat's probably not relevant to the lawsuit :) If the telephone company did screw up, she has a right to sue. Even if she is a terrible person. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 02:35 AM |
| 2 | PZ Myers again: Seven paragraphs about isolated, female alleged genital mutilation, and not one word about the millions of boys victimized yearly.Here (PDF) is the doctor's paper. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/10 02:32 AM |
| 3 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?Hypocrites exist. As do people who believe murder is more wrong than sexual immorality. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/10 03:59 AM |
| 0 | What would happen in our society if we did have a 'male abortion' of sorts?I disagree with your assumption that more equal is always more right. I agree that allowing 'male abortion' along with real abortion would, on the surface, be more equal (although, since many women are religiously opposed to abortion, the decision for a woman to abort her child would be very different from the decision of a man not to pay for it). But if allowing this equality hurt more people than it helped, how would it be more right? We like equality because it is generally helps the most peo… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 06:36 PM |
| 9 | Falsely accused woman sues her accusers, her employer, and the sheriff.New protocol: Don't ignore the old protocol. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 06:05 PM |
| 5 | Heartless Bitches International - "The RED FLAG List"If (you think) someone is a troll, please do not feed them. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 03:04 AM |
| 1 | The best way to deal with 'Concern Trolls' such as Saydrah, AtomicParrot, Catlebrity and the like? Starve them. If you talk to them, they win.Really? I can't find it... | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 03:46 PM |
| 3 | The best way to deal with 'Concern Trolls' such as Saydrah, AtomicParrot, Catlebrity and the like? Starve them. If you talk to them, they win.Pretty sure talking about them counts... | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 11:08 AM |
| 4 | Bill attempts to change divorce law in California. If it is passed, hiring someone to kill your husband(like in the case mentioned) or wife, will count against you in the eventual divorce proceedings.Contribute to the discussion, or go away. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 10:53 AM |
| 4 | Small and inaccurate guns handed out to the English PM's bodyguards to get more women into the job.If this is true, (the citation in the post is the Daily Mail) it shouldn't be. But do I really need to read that obnoxious of a blog post to get that information? | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 02:25 AM |
| 6 | Female English MP mentions one third of DV victims are men.About time. I got disillusioned with feminism (or at least the feminist group at my college) freshman year when I tried to bring up the stats on male DV victims to advertise for Take Back the Night. It didn't go over very well. It's sad that so many people assume DV is always perpetrated by a man against a woman. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 02:22 AM |
| 2 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.I meant, I didn't think the media would portray it as "Moms aren't necessary". I have no doubt that, if they did, women would get angry. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:08 PM |
| 7 | Rich wife to pay ex-husband $4000 a weekI also upvoted because I thought people should see how silly alimony can be, and that it can affect people of both genders. No hypocrisy here, I don't think. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:07 PM |
| 6 | 2 years for stalking?Uzomah was on probation at the time for an incident in Orange County, Calif., in which he eventually pleaded guilty to three misdemeanors, including assault, battery and carrying a switchblade knife after he attacked one of Seacrest's bodyguards outside an event. So he's a repeat offender who was on probation at the time. It makes sense he'd get a heavier sentence. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 10:47 PM |
| 29 | Rich wife to pay ex-husband $4000 a weekYep. I don't think it's fair to oppose wealthy men paying alimony to their former stay-at-home wives and simultaneously call this a victory. Why should anyone get his/her former spouse's money just because that spouse provided support during the marriage? I can understand some support for a limited amount of time to allow the spouse time to find a job if s/he didn't work during the marriage. But I don't see why this guy should be entitled to continue living the lifestyle he had when he was marri… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 10:40 PM |
| 1 | Don’t you want EQUALITY in your relationship?Exactly. Community property scares the hell out of me--why would I want my SO, wonderful though he is, to have default rights to money that I earned and he didn't? My mother will probably never marry her fiance because he has debts that she does not want to be responsible for. Community property really doesn't make sense for couples where both people work. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 08:09 PM |
| 3 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.Kids, THIS is a troll. Take note. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 08:00 PM |
| 2 | You want to be a Dad? Who needs an American woman and "family" court headaches? Here's an interesting article on surrogacy in India.It pays well, but I don't like that the women are required to live at the clinic, or that they sign agreements written in English that they may not understand. But I do think these women have a right to do what they want with their bodies, and while it's sad that gestating a stranger's baby is the best way they can make money, taking this option away from them would not make conditions better. Other concerns raised include the “renting” of Indian women’s bodies by westerners... Somehow, I don't … | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 06:44 PM |
| 0 | unbanned 4: cryptogirl, catlebrity, erszebet_b, MercatorWhiteReally? I thought it was for being snarky :) | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 05:50 PM |
| 2 | How Long Can Feminists Pin It On 'Fringe Radicals'?The general issue is that, as the article stated, it is those "fringe" Feminists who have the political power to cause problems for men. Eh, I think the article was misleading about exactly how powerful each of these women are. Gudrun Schyman is a former Swedish politician. Her "man tax" idea is crazy, but according to Wikipedia, her current political party has not managed to gain the 4% of the votes necessary for representation in Parliament. She may have previously been influential, but she do… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 01:56 PM |
| 4 | Dad stages protest in Glens Falls, NY over DNR order issued on his disabled son without his permissionYikes. I would like to know how old the son is. Section 2967 requires consent of the legal guardian/parent and consent of the minor unless the physician determines that the child is unable to provide consent. So it sounds like, assuming the son is as competent as the father thinks he is, the son agreed to the DNR too. I couldn't find any more information on this besides that story, but if the son is an older teen, I don't think his father's wishes should be able to override his own. (If his moth… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 01:35 PM |
| 1 | You want to be a Dad? Who needs an American woman and "family" court headaches? Here's an interesting article on surrogacy in India.Sounds like it really sucks to be a surrogate. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:22 AM |
| 3 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.The premise is that healthy children can be raised by two women instead of a man and a woman. I agree that the article was sensationalist and mean ("dads aren't necessary" instead of "lesbian couples can be good parents"), but comparing it to the Holocaust is ridiculous. Nowhere in the study did it suggest that men are the cause of all parenting problems ever and should therefore be removed from society. I think that kind of suggestion would warrant a Holocaust comparison, but the study itself d… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:11 AM |
| 5 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.No. No it isn't. Correlation does not imply causation. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:02 AM |
| 2 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.Um, this isn't the same study. The study in the link was published in February, while the 25-year lesbian parents vs. straight parents study wasn't accepted for publication until March. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:01 AM |
| 8 | unbanned 4: cryptogirl, catlebrity, erszebet_b, MercatorWhiteThe butthurt. It is palpable. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 11:18 PM |
| 2 | unbanned 4: cryptogirl, catlebrity, erszebet_b, MercatorWhiteThere is a "hide" link.... | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 10:54 PM |
| 19 | According to TheAtlantic, Fathers Serve No Purpose.Lesbian families are always planned; straight families aren't. Did the study control for this? Otherwise it doesn't really mean much... | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 10:52 PM |
| 7 | Don’t you want EQUALITY in your relationship?Sounds like both the first husband and the woman were idiots. But the poster seems to think that the woman dumped him because he didn't have enough money. Sounds more like she dumped him because she found him boring, and somehow only realized that after marriage... As I said: Idiots. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 04:49 PM |
| 2 | How Long Can Feminists Pin It On 'Fringe Radicals'?Citation needed. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 02:30 PM |
| 3 | The Nonviolence LieToo much rhetoric; too few facts. Also, way too much "Feminists are..." I don't see how making a blanket statement like "Feminists are not good people" is any different from "MRAs are not good people" or "Animal rights activists are not good people" or "Republicans are not good people". Some are, some aren't. Let's see some actual data on harmful things supported by many feminists. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/10 02:24 PM |
| 1 | Feminism blamed for rising female violenceHow do you know he is pretending? Maybe he actually disagrees with some of the people here... | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 08:37 PM |
| 5 | College men need to recognize the macho culture for what it really is: insecurity [check out comments]I'd think this was a troll, but it's Yahoo, so probably not. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 08:33 PM |
| 2 | I've finally found the true meaning of 'feminism.'My boyfriend does too. Says they make him feel icky, but he's kind of a health nut. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 08:27 PM |
| 1 | Feminism blamed for rising female violenceRight, but I don't think this post qualifies for concern trolling. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 08:04 PM |
| 2 | Check Out /r/malestudies. Because people tryng to escape a burning building shouldn't have to waste time arguing about the existence of fire.Since the alternative is to simply hear about how false rape claims to ruin men's lives is okay I'm really wondering where the post on 2X is that says that. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 05:54 PM |
| 1 | I've finally found the true meaning of 'feminism.'I think the issue is more that every feminist defines the term a little differently. But cookies are good, and I've never heard anyone argue that cookies are feminist. So feminism is a subset of good. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 05:51 PM |
| 1 | Feminism blamed for rising female violenceI thought he had a good point. I'm not sure why we should expect women to be docile and men to be violent. I think you're only calling this post concern trolling because there's been so much drama about concern trolls lately... | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 04:58 PM |
| 5 | College men need to recognize the macho culture for what it really is: insecurity [check out comments]People do that, a lot. Insecure is a pretty cross-gender insult... | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 04:39 PM |
| -1 | Women who call themselves feminists, or who support feminists or feminism - no matter how nice and pleasant they might be - are Trojan Horses through which feminism maintains its torrential volley of hatred.You need to read all the way to the end of the sentence to get the point :) I'm not debating the existence of feminists who hate men. I just don't think they have organized to convince other women to call themselves feminists so their man-hating has better PR. Looks like a simple indulgence in the "taking quotes out of context" fallacy. The less-vitriolic egalitarian feminists have nevertheless refused to open their eyes and see the damage their ideas are causing. I don't think all feminists bel… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 04:36 PM |
| -1 | Women who call themselves feminists, or who support feminists or feminism - no matter how nice and pleasant they might be - are Trojan Horses through which feminism maintains its torrential volley of hatred.My point is that it's silly to say "feminists" are the enemy, because there are a lot of different people with different beliefs who identify as feminist, and they're not organized in any way. The Nazis were a political party. "Feminist" is a label people can choose to adopt if they wish. This article seems to imply that there is a secret society of man-hating radical feminists who trick innocent women into adopting the feminist label. That said, some radical feminists do say radical things and … | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 04:06 PM |
| -1 | Women who call themselves feminists, or who support feminists or feminism - no matter how nice and pleasant they might be - are Trojan Horses through which feminism maintains its torrential volley of hatred.This man legitimately believes that feminists are Nazis whose transition to power is not yet complete. That is all. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 03:38 AM |
| 6 | I'm learning SwedishParents may use their 390 days of paid leave however they want up to the child’s eighth birthday. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 03:17 AM |
| 2 | Check Out /r/malestudies. Because people tryng to escape a burning building shouldn't have to waste time arguing about the existence of fire.Eh. I don't see anything wrong with them advertising it. They want to get more people, and /r/MR is a good place to recruit them from. Who cares? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:56 PM |
| 4 | I'm learning SwedishWouldn't state-sponsored paternity leave allow the father to spend more quality time with his sons, though? It doesn't say the father must spend two months wearing an apron and prosthetic breasts. It's meant to allow both parents to spend time with their kids. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:45 PM |
| 2 | A game where you murder men who hit on you. Is this the same as RapeLay?I would think you'd be fine hitting on them in bars or somewhere else they go to be hit on. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:37 PM |
| 2 | A game where you murder men who hit on you. Is this the same as RapeLay?I'm gonna need some source on this. I believe you about people being offended by RapeLay, but have you actually seen anyone labeling Hey Baby as "empowering"? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:36 PM |
| 1 | A game where you murder men who hit on you. Is this the same as RapeLay?and maybe we should all be a little offended when even a silly game treats innocent life as completely dispendable -- even when it has a penis. If you had said "BECAUSE it has a penis", I think you would have had much more of a case. But the majority of non-casual games treat innocent life as expendable. So do movies. I'm not sure why that is particularly offensive. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:34 PM |
| 0 | A game where you murder men who hit on you. Is this the same as RapeLay?Why do you think that feminist women hate undesirable men who find them attractive? I'm a woman; I'm not sure if I would call myself a feminist, but I believe in equality between the genders. I would say that if a man I don't know finds me attractive and feels the need to tell me about it in an inappropriate way ("I want to lick you all over'), I would feel grossed out and angry, but not hate... | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:25 PM |
| 2 | A game where you murder men who hit on you. Is this the same as RapeLay?The graphics really are terrible. I'm really wondering who would want to play this game... | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 11:19 PM |
| 2 | The End of Men - Atlantic : "What if the modern, postindustrial economy is simply more congenial to women than to men?"Seriously? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 04:31 PM |
| 2 | I'm learning SwedishWhat does "spirited" mean? There's no distinctive and respected paternal role in the family but a merely unisex one based on the motherhood role. What is the paternal role in the family, then? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 04:23 PM |
| 3 | Rape claims are falsified at an alarming rateLiverotto, if women only want to have sex with you if you promise them "slavery", I would suggest going to prostitutes. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 04:12 PM |
| 1 | Rape claims are falsified at an alarming rateI'm guessing they would be tried for perjury, as would people who falsely reported any other crime. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 04:09 PM |
| 7 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"I agree with your feelings about celebrities, but I do think this would get a lot more legitimate press if it was a male celebrity sexually harassing a female staff member. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/10 03:58 PM |
| 1 | lesbians who could afford sperm donors and who volunteer for this study had children who appear to have benefitted both from their economic advantages and from their conscious knowledge that they self-report the children's' behaviourThat's possible, but couldn't the straight parents do the same thing? I assume both groups would want their parenting skills to come out looking "better" than the other group's. Edit: Assuming that the straight parents knew they were in a study comparing the outcome of children of straight parents to the outcome of children of lesbian parents, of course. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 01:23 PM |
| 1 | lesbians who could afford sperm donors and who volunteer for this study had children who appear to have benefitted both from their economic advantages and from their conscious knowledge that they self-report the children's' behaviourI think, since all groups in the study self reported, that part of the complaint is probably not an issue. It is disturbing that one of the authors of the study appears to consider male parents inferior to female parents though. I'd guess that the discrepancy in the study is because, since two women cannot get pregnant by accident, the lesbian couples were more prepared on average when they became parents than the straight couples were. I wonder if a similar study involving gay male couples with… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 01:09 PM |
| 1 | The rape charge, I get that. . . but why aren't they both charged with "concealing the death of a child?"No, she was statutorily raped; though there is no mention of coercion. The reason statutory rape laws exist is to protect minors who don't have enough maturity to make decisions about having a sexual relationship with an adult. Basically, because of how young she was and how big the age difference was between them, there isn't really a difference between "statutorily raped" and "really raped". | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 11:27 AM |
| 3 | lesbians who could afford sperm donors and who volunteer for this study had children who appear to have benefitted both from their economic advantages and from their conscious knowledge that they self-report the children's' behaviourI don't think this necessarily has terrible implications for men. It's not saying "children do better without fathers", it's saying: Adolescents who have been reared in lesbian-mother families since birth demonstrate healthy psychological adjustment. Just because children can do well with two moms doesn't mean they can't do well with a mom and a dad, or with two dads. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 11:15 AM |
| 0 | Anonymity for UK men accused of rape is not going to happen thanks to their treacherous Prime MinisterSo you have no problem with defining rape as a man forcing a woman to have sex, right? Since most of the rapists are men and most of the rape victims are women? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 10:33 AM |
| 4 | The rape charge, I get that. . . but why aren't they both charged with "concealing the death of a child?"She was a 13 year old who got pregnant with a 30-year-old's baby. I would think psychiatric care, and a look into her family situation--where were her parents when all this was happening?--should come before charging her with any crimes. I'd really like to know how far along the fetus was. If it was viable, I kind of understand charging the boyfriend with concealing the death of a child. But if not, this was a fetus, not a child. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 11:45 PM |
| 0 | Do not call people with different views "trolls."Do you want only people who agree with you to comment in this subreddit? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 10:02 PM |
| 3 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!It's more funny than threatening... | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 03:33 PM |
| 2 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!I got banned too! Want to form a club? We could call it Female Studies and only let people who have already been banned from Male Studies in! Then we could sit in a circle and stimulate each others' genitals! | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!Two wrongs... how many rights? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:57 PM |
| 2 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!Or maybe--YOU DOWNVOTED IT YOURSELF WITH YOUR OTHER ACCOUNTS!!!! omg conspiracy | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:56 PM |
| 6 | Anonymity for UK men accused of rape is not going to happen thanks to their treacherous Prime MinisterI really don't see why false rape accusers can't be charged with something. Obstruction of justice? Obviously, this should only happen in cases where it's pretty clear the accusation was false, and the accuser should have a fair trial. But given that false accusations hurt both the accused and people who have actually been raped, I don't think false accusers should be able to lie with impunity. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:28 PM |
| 6 | Feminist trolls on /MRtomek77, I'm a woman who sometimes posts to MensRights. I do this because I think that the men's rights movement has some legitimate complaints, and there are often good discussions here. I don't know if I would label myself a feminist--I believe in equality between the sexes, and I don't identify with the radical feminist movement. So I have a question: Would you prefer if there were no women in MensRights? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:03 PM |
| 5 | Feminist trolls on /MRDid you just respond to an accusation that you only post to call other people trolls by saying the accuser is a troll? You win at life. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Feminist trolls on /MRWhy do you think this is happening? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 01:51 PM |
| 0 | Anonymity for UK men accused of rape is not going to happen thanks to their treacherous Prime MinisterUgh. While I agree with rape defendant anonymity, this article is extremely obnoxious: So what we have here is yet another state-delivered kick to the teeth of the male sex. Thanks to the gutless wonders in power, British women will retain their power to destroy a man’s life with a mere accusation, and even if the allegation turns out to be completely bogus the woman will still keep her reputation intact because no one will know that she is the lying scumbag in that particular case. If she does … | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 01:46 PM |
| 3 | A Parents Worst Nightmare - 15 Year Old Boy Falsely Accused of RapeWhat did this story have to do with feminists? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 01:40 PM |
| 2 | One man com killed himself, another man's life destroyed - yet, serial false rape accuser is unrepentant (and anonymous)If I had to guess, I'd say it's because the Daily Mail is a UK tabloid, so American redditors don't realize exactly how silly it is. The only solution is for the UK to export it to the United States and put racks of them next to the National Enquirer in grocery checkout lanes. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/10 09:26 PM |
| 1 | Guy gets taken advantage by another guy while drunk. Reddit commences with the "hey at least you got a free blowjob" comments, instead of treating him like the almost-rape victim he is.Getting drunk and driving is different from getting drunk and getting raped. If you get drunk and drive, that is a bad decision. If you get drunk and get raped, that isn't your decision, that's someone else taking advantage of you. I guess if what you mean is, if the guy hadn't been drinking, this wouldn't have happened, so his actions contributed to the rape, then that's true, but I don't think the fact that he was drinking makes the rapist less guilty. (I wouldn't consider a mugger in a poor n… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/10 09:22 PM |
| 1 | "Reproductive choice isn’t a fundamental right if it’s only limited to people who have internal reproductive systems, if it only applies to women, it’s a limited right and that weakens it."The problem I see with this is that it could lead to the child growing up in poverty. As the law stands, if a child is conceived, both the man and woman have financial responsibility for it, only the woman has an additional right to abortion since her body is supporting the child. I can't think of a way to give this right to men, short of forcing a woman to have/not have an abortion. Once the child is born, its welfare needs to be taken into consideration. I'd recommend that men insist on condom… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/10 02:09 PM |
| 0 | Anger over the serial rape liar who drove an innocent man to kill himself.What? Why does that make sense? | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 02:36 PM |
| 1 | PZ Meyers lashes out at freak who claims "rape is equality." Fine. Then he lumps him together with all the other MRAsDEATH TO REPOSTERS | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 03:51 AM |
| 4 | So You Want to Get Married? Tying the Knot in the Age of Marriage 2.0I agree with many of the points this article is trying to make, but the article is obnoxious. All men are wage earners and all women are housewives, so divorced men should be entitled to "weekly cleaning, a hot meal 7 nights a week, and 'romantic companionship' services"? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 03:38 AM |
| 6 | Underage girl lies about her age, Man gets in troubleThe article didn't say anything had happened to the men. Nothing. No complaint was filed, they weren't kicked off their team. Betting was suspended on their team for the next match. Stop trying to create outrage. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 03:34 AM |
| 2 | Acquitted Georgia teacher files lawsuit over molestation trial against Catoosa County sheriff's department, two child advocacy centers, parents of her accusers, social workers and a child therapist.It seems the power of CHILD RAPE PANIC to ruin people's lives is not confined to one sex. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 03:17 AM |
| 1 | Divorce is never the woman's fault. This time its the phone companys fault.Yeah, I've noticed that on other subreddits. I guess it looks less obnoxious on r/aww or r/lolcats, since there really are no bad lolcats. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 02:39 AM |
| 3 | P.Z. Myers thinks MRAs are rape advocates.If he is actually saying that rape is right, he's crazy and not worth listening to. If he's saying it as hyperbole, he's just a douchebag. Whether you agree with them or not, affirmative action programs and equal opportunity programs are not rape of white men. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 12:08 AM |
| 4 | Sexism in medicine.I would say, for children, ADD/ADHD. According to Wikipedia, there are about four times as many boys as girls diagnosed with ADHD. I would guess that this is partially because the disorder is overdiagnosed, and children who are disruptive in a classroom setting are given medications in order to make them easier to manage. For whatever reason (I've heard many, but I'm not sure what to believe), boys are "more disruptive" to classrooms than girls are. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 11:25 PM |
| 1 | Wife confesses to domestic violenceDaily Mail. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 11:18 PM |
| 0 | Divorce is never the woman's fault. This time its the phone companys fault.Stopped reading after "The Morally Superior Sex". Does every obnoxious blog post about a woman doing something bad have to get posted to MensRights? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 11:14 PM |
| 1 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsSorry, you're right, I should have said "people" who don't feel comfortable. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/10 06:06 AM |
| -1 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsSo that women who don't feel comfortable having people know that they've been raped are able to press charges. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but don't individual police departments/media... units? choose not to release/report the names of people claiming to be rape victims? (As opposed to there being a law about it...) | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 07:45 PM |
| 1 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsResearch. It was a study involving 109 reports of rape in a small town. This fact is cited in the article I linked... | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 03:29 PM |
| 1 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"I think the troll won. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 04:16 AM |
| -1 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsActually, I think you can make a pretty good argument against this law based on freedom of the press... | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 04:12 AM |
| 2 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsWhat about the study cited in this article? (This study estimates 8-10%, but doesn't say how hat compares to the false report rate for other crimes.) I'm pretty sure the 40% figure came from one small study, as did the 2% figure. everyone has the right to presumption of innocence Yes. But not everyone has the right to prevent the release of their name to the media in connection with a criminal investigation. That's what we're discussing here. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 04:10 AM |
| 2 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsI can guarantee you the number of false rape charges are substantially higher then false murder charges. If you can guarantee it, let's see the source :) | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 11:41 PM |
| 2 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsI would really like to know the proportion of rape accusations that are shown to be false to total accusations. If it is high compared to that of other crimes, I would support rape defendant anonymity, but if it's comparable or lower, the women quoted in the article have a point. Does anyone know of any research on this? It seems like there are a lot of advocates for men saying that there are lots of false rape accusations and a lot of advocates for women saying that false rape accusations are r… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 05:20 PM |
| 1 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"Making fun of people on the internet is never futile. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 06:35 AM |
| 1 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"Nothing... except you stated your unqualified assertion, and then he stated his, and then you stated yours again. I suppose if you want to do that and call it arguing, that's cool, but I just thought it seemed kind of silly. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 06:28 AM |
| 3 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"Firstly I listed very specific items that I suspect women are more guilty of doing than men. But before that, I qualified it by stating that this is merely my opinion. I have insufficient facts to back it up. Do you expect people not to argue with you about this because "this is merely [your] opinion"? If it's just my opinion that black people are inferior to white people, or that all men are potential rapists, or, hell, that blue and yellow are the same color, should people refrain from debatin… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 06:03 AM |
| 2 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"This article is a pretty good review of the current research on gossip. They discuss gender and gossip a little, but only to say that women were generally more interested in stories about women than men were in stories about men. This study found that (from the abstract) "no significant sex differences were uncovered regarding the derogatory tone of gossip". | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 05:56 AM |
| 1 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"Do you have this belief for a reason..? | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 05:34 AM |
| 6 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"I am confident in stating my belief that back-stabbing, betrayal, intentional social isolation and ostracising; and gossip with the aim of hurting someone's feelings is almost exclusively a female vocation. In my observations, at least concerning gossip, this is an unfounded stereotype. About six months ago, I decided to try to avoid listening to or spreading gossip--I think the majority of gossip is unethical. Since I started paying attention, I've noticed that the majority of both men and wome… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 05:03 AM |
| 1 | I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real.It still looks like a penis, not a work of art. But good for you. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 12:54 AM |
| 5 | I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real.I'm a girl, and I like uncircumcised ones better. Handjobs are easier. Also, this is just an observation, and it's by no means true of all circumcised guys, but the ones I've been with had a hard time comprehending that my genitals are sensitive, and some kinds of touch do not feel good. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 12:52 AM |
| 4 | I made a decision about whether or not to circumcise my son. This is real.I dated an uncut guy who had a few stray hairs on the base of his dick, so not all cases of penis hair are caused by circumcision. If that makes you feel any better. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 12:45 AM |
| 1 | The lower-IQ sex: Measures to socially engineer more women into top positions are attempts to force square pegs into round holes and will founder on the rock of human natureHow would a difference in mean IQ of five points account for a 90-10 disparity in number of science professors? Other factors are at work... | /r/MensRights | 02/05/10 11:56 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter