TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

another-cosplaytriot Archive

View 0 posts and 395 comments by another-cosplaytriot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm sick of women appropriating the accomplishments, interests and ideas of men. They are parasites that contribute nothing. A whole gender of plagiarists.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 05:56 PM
1

Men are going to be over-represented in any activity that requires diligence, talent, and offers no convenient offramp to disguise incompetence.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:13 AM
14

Probably. Everything they do is a waste of time so it's reasonable to assume that this is peak efficiency.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 01:46 AM
2

This probably won't work for men because then the decision could possibly benefit a man, which of course we can not have.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:47 AM
1

In practice, it's a word that means competence and accountability: the kryptonite of any feminist.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:18 AM
2

The main divide is that feminism is a hate group and we are the people they hate.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:53 AM
5

Narcissists, which basically includes all women at this point, believe the world revolves around them. Good or bad, everything must be about themselves.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:52 AM
17

Reagan ruined that concept. That's right conservatives, your golden god ruined your favorite institution.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:44 AM
125

Because it's a hate group.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:45 PM
26

All you need to start thinking about mens rights is to witness a divorce, or any criminal proceeding involving a man. Comparing the experiences of men and women in these situations tells you everything you need to know about "systemic sexism".
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:08 PM
27

Not trying to start any toxic conversations, my point is , are any men feeling like they don’t want to take on that role as the “provider” anymore? Listen to them. Why would you provide for somebody who despises you? We've got an entire culture of parasites now.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:41 PM
1

The notion that women can handle rejection AT ALL is complete delusional fiction. A constant string of unending pussy-passes have made women so spoiled and entitled that they have absolutely no idea what to do when somebody says no.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:33 PM
4

If it was a felony, that is what would effectively happen. Felons can't vote in most places.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 08:47 AM
6

Agreed. I'm just about out of fucks to give for the "fairer" sex, but I love what that judge said. It's a shame that literally the only place I can hear that kind of defense for men is on some stupid reality tv show.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:25 AM
1

Compare that same age bracket across Gen-Z, Millennials, Gen-X, boomers, older. There's a pretty solid upward trend in obesity. Your generation is soft and useless.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:31 AM
9

If you give a woman the choice between solving a problem or sitting around and complaining about that same problem, they opt for complaining 9 times out of 10.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:13 AM
8

If they have their own units, they will never do as much work as men. The only reason the script is flipping on women in the workplace is because they have to contrast themselves to men who simply do a better job.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:06 PM
-4

As I look around at your fat-ass generation sitting in front of their video game consoles and scrolling away on your portable mind-control terminals, I can not help but think the main difference is alcohol and cigarette consumption.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 02:28 PM
1

Because men kill men and men kill women. This means that the issue isn't misandry. Criminals kill men and women. Being a criminal is about form and function and your fat ass is not physically capable of being a criminal. Committing crime is dangerous enough that only those who have a chance of accomplishing it even try. That's the only reason more criminals are men. The fact that nonetheless women are targeted less often is proof of yet more female privilege. EVEN THE CRIMINALS are giving you yo…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:08 AM
90

Finally they published a false-accuser's name. Normally, they give the accuser anonymity even after the crime has been disproven. Given the rampant gynocentrism in this country, I'm only about 50% sure that it will make any kind of difference, but she shouldn't be trusted to work in any office for the rest of her stupid fucking life.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:05 AM
6

Due process is important. Ask any of the men who went to court and had their lives upended for no fucking reason. It was a witch hunt, and a concerted effort to deprive men of their legal rights.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:06 PM
5

You say oblivious, I say "content". This is what they want.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:00 AM
1

Failure to register with the selective service is a felony. Felons can't vote.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 07:18 AM
21

Misogyny is sometimes a problem, but misandry is baked into every actual system we have: civil and criminal court, you can't even vote as a man unless you submit to the draft. The social safety net is mostly about women's needs. If it's a "system" it's misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/24 07:13 AM
3

I'm alone because being with what women have become would make me miserable (as it has in the past). Alone is the best case scenario.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 07:10 AM
3

This justification is projection. The person doing the justification cheats or cheated and is not even talking about the same person you're talking about. They're talking about themselves. Actually that's a good rule of thumb: if a woman is speaking, it is about herself.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 06:39 AM
21

AI is going to neatly replace all the do-nothing jobs these parasites currently occupy.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 03:58 AM
19

If women were bigger and stronger then they would be the criminals. This is an issue of form and function. But even among the criminals they still choose to target more men than women which means women are still enjoying privilege.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:18 AM
3

The most likely people who will become criminals are the ones that stand the best chance to succeed at committing the crime. So, men. That's a logical conclusion. But the fact that the criminals target more men than women means that even AMONG THE FUCKING MUGGERS women are enjoying preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:16 AM
2

Ahhh yes. It's the women saying "no". Copetastic.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:29 AM
1

Basically.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:10 AM
3

Kleptoproduction?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:09 AM
10

If this stupid fucking product finally gets some baby-trap laws on the books, let them keep digging their hole.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:07 AM
6

I'd like to figure out how I can help homeless men specifically. I feel like they are particularly underserved compared to the many assistance options available to women.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 06:47 AM
27

Ahhhh marriage. The sacred bond between parasite and host.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 06:44 AM
1

Why wouldn't she? She's never been held accountable for a anything in her life. Why should she be different from any other woman?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 05:20 AM
3

You don't even really need to understand or argue about the reason. It's as easy as looking at the math. There are only a fixed number of criminals and because men are targeted more often than women, we can conclude that for WHATEVER REASON, women are given preferential treatment as victims.... just as they are in every other aspect of society.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:40 AM
12

Either abolish it or make women subject to it. But it is bullshit that I can't vote unless I submit to conscription while women can.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:31 AM
7

I am more concerned about the delusions feminists have about themselves. That is what's causing the performative victimhood and perpetuates the myths that lead to men being demonized.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:23 AM
2

Again, conspiracy theories are not the way forward. It's not a theory, it's the stated policy from Disney's CEO. In this case, he's vocally opted to double down on the policies that cost that company billions last year. If you are an investor, you might considering shorting Disney next year because Bob Iger is doing exactly what you say is inconceivable.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:07 AM
3

I don't see how favoring female authors would benefit ereaderiq.com or amazon. Perhaps you've never been involved in a frivolous DEI-spawned lawsuit. Even if you weren't doing anything wrong and win, it's still a money sink. It's essentially bullying tactics. The company stands to lose less money by caving.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:05 AM
7

The sci-fi section is now the Mary-Sue section. People keep asking why little boys are reading less, and the femitards will say things like "video games", or "porn" but I sense that the more realistic answer is that every book they pick up demonizes and/or clowns men and boys. The men are weak, villains, or incompetent in every book written by a female Millennial. It's all they can write.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 02:02 AM
15

Man, your idea of what feminists believe sounds really really scary. thankfully for us non of your spicy takes have a basis in reality. You're a delusional asshole. What you sarcastically provided is a near perfect description of the real world.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 01:55 AM
12

Courts and a police system that respect due process and do not accept baseless accusations at face value simply because the accuser is a woman. It would be nice if there was no Duluth model which assumes men are automatically guilty in every confrontation. That would be nice. Given the overwhelming nature of the Duluth model and feminism's direct hand in creating that fucking monstrosity, it always amazes me when feminists are not aware of it.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 01:53 AM
10

Many are women-only.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 01:50 AM
6

Another thing to note is that even the CRIMINALS give women preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 09:39 AM
5

That's what MeToo was. No thanks. What we need is even-handed application of existing laws without this ridiculous pussy pass.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 09:35 AM
9

Maybe not, but you can give them something to be victims about. No I'm not talking about violence, simply don't be host to the parasites. Pay your own way and no further. Do not support them. Do not hire them. Don't join the military to defend a country that hates you. Cover your own ass. Barter and trade services with other men instead of participating in commerce and sending your tax dollars to a government that only funds women's needs. Men do everything important. If you're willing to be a l…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:30 AM
8

I think you are being overly charitable when you claim they are unaware.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:19 AM
15

At least make a cursory attempt to follow the argument. Or I can get you some more crayons to eat.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:18 AM
15

Sure. It's responsibility and/or accountability. No real surprise.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 05:47 AM
23

It's not just that the stories are about women, it's Millennial women in the writer's room. These are supremely entitled narcissists who can't help but insert their own personal grievances into everything they write. A generation of lotus-eating feminist drones have grown up, weaponized twitter and are capitalizing on the all-pervasive demonization of men. The quickest way to fight is to not pay for their shitty products, but the long term solution is to get men back in the writer's room.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 02:43 AM
4

I don't understand how so many women are getting degrees, and yet they still don't do shit at work. Even at the high-end jobs described by this story men are still carrying them because the only thing that got them through college in the first place was favoritism.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:39 AM
27

A woman can't even have a conversation unless she herself is at least tangentially the subject. It DOES NOT MATTER what you started talking about, it'll be about herself by the 3rd sentence.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 01:10 AM
32

Her voice just made me gay.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 12:54 AM
1

It is a mistake to give a narcissist the attention she is looking for.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:21 AM
5

The media environment is ripe for independent films right now. The big streamers and studios are failing and small budget productions are really shining. It is possible to create small films for a massive profit now.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:19 AM
13

Since I realized all my taxes go towards supporting female-only programs, you can also say "No" by simply earning enough money to support yourself... and then stopping. My long term goals (which I'm proud to say I just barely achieved) were completely getting out of debt, and earning no more than the minimum deductible in income each year. I barter or make or fix everything else for myself. Obviously the hardest part is paying off a mortgage, but if you throw your entire salary at it for a few y…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:06 AM
8

It's necessary. And often entertaining!
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:46 AM
30

It is. You can control your own behavior. There's no need to cater to her indulgent narcissism. Just start rejecting these idiots until they get the picture or live in cat-city.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:44 AM
15

Spoiled children do not know how to handle rejection. That's what makes them spoiled.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:23 AM
3

Honestly, I think most of us would be happy just not being pointlessly demonized for 20 minutes. Do that and you're golden. All you have to do is nothing. :)
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:21 AM
11

It's not voluntary, by definition dead people have no volition. I can gt out the crayons if I have to.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:10 AM
2

That's the point, they'll keep breeding the slave underclass without your permission.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:09 AM
72

Yeah, had a similar situation years ago with a girlfriend. Her therapist essentially absolved her of all responsibility in her life and fed her a bunch of reasons to avoid accountability. It's always somebody else's fault.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 05:18 AM
2

What you are seeing started with revisionist history, and now is moving into revisionist biology. It's one of the warning signs of the collapse of a healthy culture. Beware wrongthink!
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:27 AM
2

The best advice is to get into no relationship and stay there before some parasite bleeds you out.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:23 AM
5

Virtue-Signaling™ now with less virtue!
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:20 AM
3

When people say that Tate or Peterson are the cause they're being willfully ignorant. Peterson has real advice to offer, but Tate is a grifter that is leveraging an epidemic of discontent among young men. The problem is nobody seems to be asking why those young men were discouraged enough to listen to an idiot like Tate in the first place. Most of us here already realize it, but it's because they have real problems that nobody else was willing to talk about. It's the fucking emperor's new clothe…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 02:58 AM
5

The film felt a little like a modern guy struggling with modern issues of his own making and also of others. It was relatable So, the exact opposite of historical reality.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 07:57 PM
7

If the problem is that x% of <insert demographic> students can't go to college, I'm not against spending money to help <same demographic> learn how to pass their exams. But letting people in who are unqualified, or having non-merit based scholarships is a morally indefinsible waste of taxes. The money should be spent before college, and everything should be merit-based from then on. If a black or hispanic kid from east LA needs another year to get his scores up enough to qualify for college, and…
/r/MensRights25/11/23 05:47 PM
134

Well she's welcome to come break some glass ceilings in the underwater welding industry. Or perhaps power-line maintenance? No? Didn't thinks so.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:11 AM
6

Oh no! Her own behavior interfered with her life.... except that IS her life because it was her own behavior. Somebody take the crayons out of her mouth and draw her a diagram.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:14 AM
13

The idea is nice, but since everybody fucking hates men, I don't see a lot of hope for it. What you are describing is how feminism itself was described to me when I was younger.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:36 AM
51

I like the image of her having handlers. Maybe a dude to make sure she puts on her headgear before taking a shower, and getting her safely to her seat on that short bus.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:33 AM
7

It is feeling like it's time to bring back some men's colleges where we don't have to deal with this kind of histrionics. I'm imagining a math class where women sit around and talk about how they feel about the Cauchy-Riemann equations instead of.... you know learning them.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:39 PM
8

This is the fucking truth. I'm so tired of watching idiots get promoted just because they have the proper chromosomes to satisfy twitter.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:23 AM
5

Yeah I heard that argument from the rug-muncher across the street the other day. I pointed out to her that Canada gets the same video games as our kids but mysteriously has no gun violence. That confused her.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:11 AM
1

Both criminal and civil courts show extreme favoritism towards women right now in the U.S. with women receiving 60% the sentencing that men do for the same crimes. And that's just the actual courts, once they get out men are demonized forever and women have dozens of re-integration programs funded by the state. Basically, every single aspect of US law preferentially favors women.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 08:30 AM
27

What do you think of the other responses in this thread that devastate your argument that you conveniently ignore? Look your lazy eyes up OR down to see the comments about the apex fallacy. This straw man is getting tired already.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:56 AM
108

That's because feminism is the thing that capitalized on the misandry. The misandry has always been here.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:47 AM
25

Cool, tell her she can pick up the tab then.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:46 AM
7

Being unburdened by parasites is the ideal situation.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 10:21 AM
26

Feminism isn't what it used to be. It's not what was advertised on the label. Equality of opportunity has been replaced retarded equity of outcomes which shouldn't even be a goal. Men were all-in when the story was: everybody gets a fair shake, but now that men need help in things like university attendance, health care, or even simply avoiding death on the job, feminists are nowhere to be seen. Women want equality at the top end of every scale but refuse to take the their fair share of responsi…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 05:27 AM
38

They're only real in the sense that they have mass and exist. They are in no way sentient.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 05:15 PM
29

63% is a good start. If you remove the nutrient source, the parasites die.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:45 AM
81

I have found that when I reject women that the response is always one of these two things: "Oh are you gay?" Because it can't just be that I'm not interested in her, right? "You must not like women" Because if I have some kind of universal problem with women as a whole, then it can't be her in particular. Notice the pattern? Their delusion is crafted specifically to protect their fragile little egos.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:19 AM
4

True, the idea of white women being an oppressed minority on campuses is ridiculous. I love it when they say shit like this. If you listen to the blue-hairs you'd think college campuses were like some big viking raid. But when they analyzed the crime rate per capita of the campuses compared to the surrounding cities, it showed that campuses are like the safest place you can be. Doesn't stop them from ramming security theater down your throat at all times and pretending every man is a walking tim…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:15 AM
4

You should expect blowback from butthurt women in your class. Please update. Would love to be wrong, but.... I'm not.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:00 AM
2

No election winner ever: I stand corrected, and have changed my viewpoint based on the data that was provided me by dissenters. She's a politician. She's a feminist. She's a she. This will never happen. It's becoming well-accepted in social science circles that women are just fucking terrible at admitting their mistakes even when the data is in front of them. Why should this one be different?
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:59 AM
1

Honestly, we need a nice big population drop. Every problem we have would be easier to deal with if we had less people. It's interesting that we could solve virtually every big problem we have (climate, energy resources, food, housing) in just one generation if we just bit the bullet and had fewer kids for 20 years.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 09:14 PM
23

Hilarious. "Here's your award for not being able to follow through with your pie in the sky."
/r/MensRights20/10/23 09:09 PM
16

Those aren't friends. This is how you can tell.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 09:07 PM
3

When women cry about something the world jumps to help them with their problems. This doesn't happen for men, we learned early that it is pointless. Doesn't mean the problem is not there, it just means we can't be attention whores to achieve results.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 09:06 PM
9

It's just more revisionist history. There's been a fair amount of this bullshit recently: Black Cleopatra, black UK historical figures. It's the next step in your groupthink re-education, citizen. Avoid wrongthink!
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:59 AM
17

The reason women commit suicide less is because they can't demand that somebody else do it for them, which is their usual strategy. Instead they sit around and cast themselves as victims and compete in the victim Olympics with other self-absorbed women, which is all they wanted in the first place. If you solve a problem, you lose the right to complain about it. That situation is untenable to a woman because it's the complaining they want.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:53 AM
1

The premise of this assertion ignores the existing gender disparity in STEM fields where women are already dominant such as medicine and biology. That's how they get you, get sucked into arguing the irrelevant details about a straw man assertion. If it's sexism because there are less women in engineering, the same logic holds that it's sexism that's keeping men out of medicine. Neither assertion is particularly compelling.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:49 AM
7

They may expect more, but they do not deserve more.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:07 AM
2

Man-hating is basically in Disney's earnings reports.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 06:12 AM
19

I'm astonished that this bush pig feels like she is in a position to be picky. I'd have left her at the dumb-friends league so she could adopt the cats that will make up her future.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 04:33 PM
2

The only thing this subreddit does is provide a safespace for men to talk about your problems without being dismissed or ignored. That is valuable in and of itself. I think more people are starting to realize the hypocrisy here, and it's that awareness that eventually leads to changed voting habits. Men are 50% of the vote. Even feminists can't take that away from you. Even 2 years ago, I was largely unaware of the extent of the bullshit simply because I was never stupid enough to get married, t…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:39 PM
4

Every second you spend crying is a second you're not solving the problem that made you cry. Therefore crying is for people who can't or won't solve problems.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:07 PM
12

You shouldn't miss the relationship you had with a parasite.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:02 PM
15

That's the problem. You won't hear it. When "people" are kidnapped, it's mostly men. But when "women" are kidnapped it's like 3 women per 1000 victims. They use generic terminology to erase the fact that most of the "people" were men.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 08:37 PM
30

Ahhhh yes. Women that do not make the choices feminists demand are coerced. Good times. I kind of amazed at your assertion that they've bothered to move the goalposts because that would mean they read the data. A feminist bothering with hard data is not something I've ever experienced. Usually a feminist "argument" devolves into some self-absorbed personal anecdote with no relationship to objective reality.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 02:32 AM
0

It's where women end up because they're no good working as engineers but we can't fire them.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 01:24 AM
7

The loss of men is just the loss of income for the parasites. They'll find another host.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:42 AM
0

Who hurt you?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:55 AM
47

Or nursing. Hospital administration? But then they just drive the men out like they did in teaching.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:18 AM
34

Furthermore, women already enjoy an absurd hiring preference in tech. They don't need any more incentives, they already enjoy all that we have to give.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:53 AM
33

It's stupid to expect a 50/50 distribution of jobs when there isn't a 50/50 distribution of graduating engineers. Here's some semi-recent stats from the society of women engineers, as you can see there are a very small number of women engineers who actually graduate and go on to do that job. If it's true that 33% of engineers are now women then that's too many fucking women based on these graduation figures. It also means that basically every graduating engineer who was a woman found a job, not …
/r/MensRights06/10/23 12:06 AM
1

Behold the gold standard of journalism. That's what I was taught. See an anomaly? Don't investigate, just start writing without asking about it. Fucking Pulitzer in her future.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:26 AM
3

I love the verbal gymnastics, as if the author had to ask herself: "How can I complain about this without looking like the hypocrite I actually am?"
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:08 AM
5

I'm just astonished they used the proper term. Usually this is characterized as an "inappropriate relationship".
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:06 AM
13

I love it when feminists talk about the horrors that the Nazis inflicted upon homosexuals.... when it was all against men. Gay women were not persecuted like gay men were. The same is largely true throughout history. They did the same thing with Black Lives Matter. Sure, a black person is 3x as likely as a white person to get harassed by the cops, but a man is 20x as likely as a woman to get the treatment. So in practice, BLM is actually a men's issue. See? We can take their issues away just as …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:25 PM
16

Yikes! You could take this as an opportunity to make your teachers hear an opposing viewpoint. Learn enough English to make an opposing argument and force them to correct your grammar. That'll piss them off. Obviously this will backfire because nobody is as petty as a feminist interacting with hard data. I'm not saying it'll be good for your grades, but it will be good for your mind. Here are some fun topics you could use: Women have never been subject to conscription. During the war in Ukraine,…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:17 PM
5

Bullshit. The thing that motivates people to lie is knowing there will be no consequences for doing so.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:52 AM
11

Love it. Next up, affirmative action to get women into janitorial services. Not even joking. If equity is the goal, then women are clearly not meeting their obligations.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:30 AM
1

Sounds familiar....
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:55 PM
6

That's pure 100% pharmaceutical grade copium. There are no such women, or at best very few. Physics doesn't care about your ideology.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:48 PM
3

Yeah, these days when friends ask me to go to a movie, I inevitably have to ask "Is this going to be another one of those movies where I have to pretend to believe a woman can fight?"
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:46 PM
22

Men commit more suicide because they want to die, whereas women only want attention. These arguments just cement the fact that women are self-absorbed narcissists leveraging imaginary victimhood.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 10:44 PM
1

The happiest marriage is no marriage.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:55 PM
2

False premise..... the same false premise. If by "before" you mean before the industrial revolution then maybe we can talk, but unless you have a time machine this is yet another feminist straw man.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:54 PM
5

"Toxic Masculinity" is just the feminist's attempt to implement an imaginary analog to Female Hysteria on men. Both concepts are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:48 AM
-15

I'm not against people raising kids, I just think you're a narcissistic asshole if you actually make a brand new one while there are still such things as "orphans". On an overpopulated planet, the only morally justifiable way to be a parent is to adopt.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:42 AM
30

They are most of the problem.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:19 AM
3

Nope. They stab each other in the backs.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 09:32 AM
4

They don't complain about older women dating younger men, and they don't recognize statutory rape when it's committed by a woman either. For some examples, see every "inappropriate relationship" where the teacher was a woman.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 09:28 AM
6

A slightly more advanced form of pornography: i.e. something that makes a man happy, so it must be bad. I don't see the appeal, but then I don't understand why a grown man would watch baseball either. The point is, a woman sees it and needs to shit on it because a man is in danger of enjoying himself.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:04 AM
2

They are worthless. Do not engage with the dullards and you will be happier. If you try, you will have to hear about situations that occurred 70 years in the past to their grandmothers as if this is somehow relevant this year. Maybe ask them if they have a time travel device because that's the only way any of their stupid arguments could possibly have relevance. If you disagree with them on any issue, they'll somehow frame you as a white nationalist even if the issue has nothing to do with race.…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 06:48 AM
50

It sounds great if you're the one receiving it. If you're the one providing the support without so much as a thank you then it doesn't have that pleasant ring you mentioned.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 05:09 PM
2

Yep. Something completely innocuous is later recognized as a chance to garner more attention. So she jumps on the "I'm a victim" gravy train. It's like jangling the keys to a young woman narcissist woman. The only thing these self-absorbed cretins want is attention. All other things are irrelevant, including the coach that led her to a championship.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 06:57 AM
10

Is this a genuine DV service? Or just a way of ensuring that ideologically feminist run DV services maintain control of services offered to men? That's my question. I'd like to assume the best, but the most likely scenario is that this is a form of controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 06:55 AM
6

Sounds like victory to me.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 06:52 AM
24

This is a solid strategy. Put your casual in their serious hole.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:50 PM
7

The hive mind told her all men are bad and she joined the collective. They look and talk as if they were people, but if they don't have any of their own thoughts, then are they?
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:35 PM
5

Women are given leniency in every situation, including crime.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:58 PM
11

The is really the quickest, easiest solution. Don't let her move in either if you live in a state that still has the barbaric practice of common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:40 AM
17

Ahhh, CNN and all its adorable euphemisms. "Loneliness" instead of "Predictable effects of decades of demonization".
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:55 AM
6

You probably shouldn't take seriously the complaints about appearance when they come from a female wearing 2 layers of war paint and sporting a boob job. It's just a matter of time before somebody makes a little face-mounted computer tablet so that these quasimodos don't have to go into public without their instagram filters.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:50 AM
5

I think somebody looked at the Masterson trials and went: Oh hey, we don't even need to pretend there's evidence any more. Thanks MeToo!
/r/MensRights19/09/23 03:53 AM
2

You need to fix the part of you that thinks it's acceptable to convict people in the absence of evidence prior to due process. Sadly that part of you is labelled "Gen-Z" and it's practically a learning disability at this point.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 03:45 AM
13

She's saying this bullshit because she wants to break up with you. Get out fast, she's just trying to piss you off with nonsense because she doesn't have the courage to just end it like an adult.... just like the rest of them. Her goal is to get you angry, maybe taunt you into saying something that she can interpret as misogyny so she can feel good about breaking up. It's a chickenshit move, Don't give her the satisfaction, force her to deal with this like an adult,
/r/MensRights18/09/23 08:47 AM
184

There were 78,000 signatures on that petition to keep him from returning to the education that she denied him with her lies. What's the opposite of a class action suit? Can one man sue 78000 people?
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:07 AM
-2

Only men are forced to wars. That's not bigotry, that's me reporting the facts to your delusional ass.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:19 AM
8

It gathers all the dullards under the one same easily-identified umbrella?
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:16 AM
9

It's even a little deeper than that though. It's not just that feminists don't understand mens rights, they also don't understand their own ideology. Many of these NPCs still think that feminism is an equality movement, when (by the most charitable characterization) it is a women's advocacy movement that will not help men if it's necessary to preserve the equal opportunity they pretend to uphold. If you look at the southern poverty law center's criteria for classifying a hate group, it is fabulo…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:19 PM
9

Agreed. There are thousands of programs for girls. Help them study for college, help study women's health, help homeless women but not men. None of my tax dollars are helping men, only women.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:13 PM
19

That's extremely low. In fact it's a lot lower than the average rate of rapes committed in the population as a whole. So it turns out that university campuses are extremely safe places for women, the exact opposite of what the lying feminists said. Excellent work. Would love any hard links to the information, though I can probably find it eventually if I have to.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:52 PM
4

There we go. When in doubt, assume the answer is feminists attempting to drain you of your tax dollars, because that is their primary motivation.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:50 PM
44

It's just hos before bros. The men have been driven out of the industry, and the remaining women simply give better grades to the girls. Over lockdown, there was an interesting study that showed in large Zoom classes when the identity of the student was masked (by just being a username with no picture of their face), girls' grades plummetted because the favoritism they were being shown was suddenly gone. Girls are being given yet another pussy-pass. When I was in high school all the science and …
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:52 AM
2

When a woman asks "where are the good men", just tell her the correct answer: Those men are busy fucking the women that know how to make a salad. This fat-acceptance bullshit needs to end. It's just an excuse to be lazy.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:47 AM
6

If I remember correctly, the "in-" part means involuntary. Nothing in this question is logically consistent. If you "want" something, it's voluntary. The mere fact that you have no idea what how the word is defined is a little alarming. You can't even use it in a sentence well enough to ask whatever question you have. Did AI produce this question, or something similarly programmed like a feminist?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:39 AM
2

Like toxic masculinity, mansplaining, or any other term designed to demonize men, it only means "a man is saying or doing something that I do not like". Whatever definition it once had is irrelevant because the only people that use the term are people who do not understand the term and are simply looking for a term of hate. It means a female is talking at you.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:36 AM
4

You're probably right. Those laws won't be changed until women are actually affected by them. Recently there have been a small number of high-profile alimony cases where the woman had to pay because her income was higher. A few more of those and they might finally do away with that fucked up system, but my fear is they'll just dream up some new plan which screws men again in a new way.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:23 AM
5

We need a centrist party devoted to mens issues. I'm what a leftie was before progressives hijacked the party and turned it into a clown show. I'm definitely considered a centrist in this stupid day and age though simply because I think kids shouldn't cut off their dicks before they have the right to buy a beer. I think there's beginning to be room for a moderate party that revolves around mens issues. Yang tried to have a science based party and that failed because the US is too fucking stupid …
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:21 AM
50

Why should a feminist do homework when any reasonable discussion can be sidelined with an irrelevant anecdote that they believe is important? That or they'll talk about the situation as it was 70 years ago as if we are somehow subject to time travel mishaps.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:17 AM
2

I like this one. It's clinical. It's accurate, and you can diagnose and address the problem. Parasites die when you cut off the nutrient source.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:05 AM
1

Oh my god that's awesome.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:21 AM
1

There's some youtube non-entity (can't remember her name) who just did a mildly reasonable piece on the state of men's rights and for some reason she is getting a bazillion views and for saying the exact same thing thousands of men have been saying for upwards of 20 years. Women only consider other women. The in-group bias trumps all other considerations. They will defend a murderer or a pedophile so long as it's a woman. They will fabricate any number of superficial justifications for a woman's…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:41 AM
15

They know that they will face no serious consequences because the victim will be male. Just another manifestation of their cowardice.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:17 AM
10

Respectfully, I appreciate any woman who is actually listening to these issues, but women will never get the incel/racist/whatever treatment that men get for voicing these issues by virtue of the fact that they are still women.... and women have a well-documented in-group bias. A woman will never hate another woman as much as they hate a man who, I dunno, just wants a fair shake in family court.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:13 AM
1

I don't know, but that just makes me want to use it more often.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:41 PM
16

So.... feminists are dodging accountability for their part in this. Sounds on-brand.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:55 AM
1

They were not allowed out of the country.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:45 AM
1

Those who tried were turned back at the Polish border, maybe others.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:45 AM
1

Women have more than equality as is. They have dozens of privileges men do not enjoy, specifically including exclusion from the selective service.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:44 AM
9

They are complaining because age is FINALLY catching up with him, and he's not built like a 20-year old any more. Dude is 59 years old and basically in better shape than all of gen-z.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:20 AM
3

I think if his sister had 50 years to practice, then one day, with a lot of work, discipline and effort, she could rise to the level of cunt.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:15 AM
1

She explained exactly jack shit. In a standard display of feminist duplicity she refused to discuss any of the issues mentioned, precisely because those are the issues that need discussing.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/23 12:32 PM
14

You can blame Reagan for that bit of crap.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:56 AM
7

Thatcher was literally insane. The choice to quote her tells you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:49 AM
5

That's right kids, it's not just the left gaslighting you, it's everybody.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:48 AM
12

Celebrate Mediocrity! ...should be on a big banner over Main St.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:09 AM
39

This is the right answer. Marriage is a funnel that is designed to take your money and give it to a "strong independent woman" so she can be strong and independent by spending your alimony.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:01 AM
48

Muggers actually DO care. When interviewed, many of them indicate that they go way out of their way to avoid targeting a woman. It's not chivalry either. They know that if a woman screams for help, she will get help. A man won't. Even in this extreme situation, women still get the soft treatment.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:40 AM
8

To be perfectly honest, liberal men are also less and less into feminism as it strays further and further away from what is advertised on the label. (I am one.)
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:27 AM
6

They absolutely do not, in the U.S. anyway. I can not speak for other legal systems. The judge can chuck one of these out on a whim.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:10 AM
13

The report he was watching said that the figure was more like 1 in 3 but that was for unmarried couples. That means 33% of all girlfriends are 304s, which is way less than my estimation.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:22 AM
28

Adorable. Give that same lever arm to a man and he'll do more with it than a woman can. Not even sure what the point of that study was.
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/23 04:14 AM
14

There's no accountability in that sub, or that gender. All these years later, it still amazes me that the half of the population that pretends to be oppressed will never achieve adulthood, will never be responsible for their own behavior, and will remain adolescent twats forever.
/r/PussyPass19/08/23 10:21 AM
3

I just don't want to date a narcissist and I'm not gay. Therefore, this is currently the most reasonable plan.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 05:21 AM
4

The left hates men. The right is incapable of governing because they're functionally retarded. The only way to win is not to play.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:37 AM
3

And yet it never has been despite what you think it's supposed to be. Women live in ez mode.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:28 AM
2

My advice is not to do that.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:26 AM
6

It's bad even in white collar jobs. Women are given passes in code reviews at the place I used to work. They can turn in absolutely ridiculous unmaintanable dogshit code and never face any consequences. When unit testing is implemented, it's always the women programmers that complain the most because it's a computer PROVING their work is substandard instead of me just noticing it.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:13 AM
3

More often than not, it's not the case that women have had bad experiences with men, it's that the experiences with men that they've had did not meet their unreasonable expectations. They have convinced themselves that they deserve more than what they got because that's just something narcissists do. And that's what they are: attention-seeking self-absorbed social-media-raised narcissists.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:21 PM
1

It is more convenient for feminists to push their victimhood narrative if they do not have to argue with a unified opposition block. Feminists can't imagine a type of human that is not driven by a need for victimhood because that is the only form of motivation that resonates with them. (They lack imagination in most other ways as well, but this is the most relevant aspect here.) Their hope is that they can divide men. It's not just along racial lines either. Feminists are driving centrist and ce…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:40 AM
3

If you don't watch, they're just complaining at their phones. By giving them attention, you give a woman the only thing she really wants.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:00 AM
1

Not to this one.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 07:59 AM
3

You know, it's not necessarily just co-dependence. He might be aware of the Duluth model and know damn well that even though his girlfriend is the asshole here, that he might end up in jail anyway. It's not completely stupid to be cagey when the cops show up. Still, they're both idiots.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 09:38 AM
48

She didn't cheat twice, she got caught twice. Who knows how many times she cheated.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 09:22 AM
2

I don't know, they've been handing out easy grades to girls for so long, maybe she thinks this IS math.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/23 08:54 AM
2

Hey look, a perfectly ordinary accomplishment: knitting a quilt. Even the kids can try this one. And look there! Just like clockwork, it's a woman breaking her damned arm trying to pat herself on the back.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/23 08:53 AM
3

It might be a death sentence. When you cut off the nutrition source for a parasite it often withers and dies. We can dream.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/23 08:50 AM
13

I agree, but get ready for more taxes. The more men refuse to support parasites, the more likely they are to find reasons to bring back the bachelor tax. I'm not joking when I say we're almost at the point where we have to start hiding our income from women as if we were criminals.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 08:47 AM
3

Feminism has led an effective campaign to demonize men in the West. This is reddit, so I'm probably going to have to listen to 50 feminists try to posit alternative explanations, but none of them are going to make any sense.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 06:57 AM
2

Women are looking for attention, not results. You give them that just by having the conversation with them.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:40 PM
5

Feminism is not an ideology it is a hate movement. And, I would argue, it is an industry as well. Just like the right is capitalizing on irrational hate of immigrants by hillbilly shitbags, the left capitalizes on irrational hate of men. It's easy! Pick your target, start lying, and demonize them until impressionable teenagers are properly converted. You can make a stupid fucking Gen-Z think anything you want because they fundamentally lack the capacity to form their own opinions.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:42 PM
3

The right direction is out the door.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 01:37 PM
4

Mind your own business is usually the best answer.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 01:01 PM
22

That is some 4 star ignorance. "A real story" This generation is doomed.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 01:00 PM
40

They are not. At all. Most of them hold signs and essentially stand around. If you need a person to hold a sign, and that person can be replaced by a 2x4 and a couple bolts, why do you pay that person?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 12:59 PM
-1

Nobody needs you to take him seriously. Nobody needs your opinion at all. Go fail another Turing test.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:24 AM
1

this dude gets it
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:23 AM
3

This is the only thing I envy about gay men. When you are in a fight with your significant other you have the privilege of arguing with a man.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:07 AM
3

You should be recording every argument.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:05 AM
5

Yes. As a deterrent. Send them straight to bankruptcy. If these people (an approximation to be sure) are being paid to write they are being paid too much because what they do is not journalism.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:01 AM
5

Usually I throw water on them. Like you would for cats.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/23 03:02 PM
9

The irony is female teachers love me and are grateful to have me around. I’m grateful to be around cause these students treat these teachers like shit and I am able to help out, a little. So even in a field that is dominated by women you are expected to pick up the slack for them?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:04 PM
1

Yeah but I'm giving the reader the benefit of the doubt because it would take a complete and utter narcissist to be making more children on a planet with too many people.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:02 PM
3

Thanks for all your hard work.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:25 PM
3

If you're only paying for one, you can work half as much. Women despise that simple logic.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:22 PM
21

It's a testament to how shitty a feminist writer is that they can't build their own compelling stories without plagiarizing an existing successful story where a man was the protagonist. There's a theory of writing that posits that women will never make for good protagonists simply because you're not allowed to do anything bad to a woman or Twitter explodes. It's called the Galbrush Paradox. You can do whatever you want to a man and nobody gives a shit. You can make a male protagonist go through …
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:41 AM
101

Isn't that where the gay men go when they're trying to get away from all the white women who treat them like pets?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:27 AM
2

They are projecting their own ease of programming onto others. Just because they lack the capacity to evaluate an argument and just believe any bullshit another women pours in their ear, they can only imagine that men are the same (again because they lack imagination).
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:01 PM
4

Because the same imagination-free NPCs that mindlessly repeat feminist slogans and debunked arguments will mindlessly repeat the 3 insults they heard last year. They have no free will. They're subhuman. When AI gets here it will be more useful than them.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 05:44 PM
21

Only men are conscripted and still about 2x as many civilian men died as women. Not sure how to make it any clearer without finger puppets.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:03 AM
4

Actually, "a lot" is a vague term. What you really mean is "almost exactly zero"
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:01 AM
1

For there to be a misunderstanding, there must be a pattern of prior "understanding". This is a woman. She does not understand things, she feels them. Give her the same amount of jail time a man could expect from the same crime.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 11:36 PM
45

The most important part about our super-important law is the fact that we are allowed to ignore those people who are attempting to enforce it. Bo-shooda Wookie!
/r/MensRights21/06/23 06:44 AM
2

Feminism is not an ideology it is an industry. This is where the lobbying starts.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:15 AM
161

I sense this move to attempt to restore basic fairness and accountability will not go unchallenged by the blue-hair gender-studies professors and other Hutts that populate the greasy underbelly of the sociology department,
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:10 AM
3

It's always been acceptable. It was just funnier when it was only an occasional jab. Gen-z and Millennials are so fucking stupid that they took the jokes seriously.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 03:56 PM
18

You can try to have a logical debate about those topics if you want, but the “women are equal” is nondebatable. Any tard can debate it. The actions, stated goals and results of feminism do not tend towards equality, the goal is clearly female superiority.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 03:39 PM
6

People love their hate-speech
/r/MensRights17/06/23 03:35 PM
10

Women in construction hold signs. They literally do nothing else.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:59 PM
4

I think it's a mistake to keep qualifying these problems as "modern" or "western" women. They're all self-absorbed narcissists. They're trained that way from birth with gynocentristm and female privilege. You're fooling yourself if you think a woman can even have a conversation that doesn't eventually end up about herself. The distinguishing characteristics modern western women have are that they are overweight and entitled, but the self-absorption and delusion are global.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:25 PM
1

Your brother's reluctance to engage with women is the only rational response to today's social environment.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 02:56 PM
7

Then have the state bill her.
/r/PussyPass11/06/23 01:26 PM
1

I rarely see women NOT being sexist to men.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/23 12:06 PM
78

....with the money their husbands earned.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 06:30 AM
4

Yet another woman providing sub-par work quality. Knowing that criminals target men more should be part of her professional knowledge, should it not? I kid of course, this is not an issue of professional incompetence, because the idea of a woman as a cop is fucking hilarious from the get-go. It's like a TV show where we all have to suspend our disbelief and just pretend that a woman can fight so we can get to the next scene. No, she's clearly just another sexist gash, we all know that.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 08:41 AM
9

Dude.... just don't do it. Alimony is utter nonsense. If this is her objection, it's a red flag. If she's this concerned about a potential you-funded retirement plan, she's already trying to figure out when that check will get cut. If you need to sign a second contract to protect you from the effects of a first contract, why would you ever consider signing the first contract in the first place?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 08:32 AM
7

Attempting suicide nets attention instead of concrete results. A not-unfamiliar dynamic for women.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 08:27 AM
3

So hilarious since more women than men ARE dating multiple people. They cheat more, they sleep around more and don't see it as cheating. They're the most likely to have some kind of "ethical poly" line of bullshit. The fact that they want this group is standard psychological projection.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:23 AM
1

When a millennial has no ideas (which is always) their answer is to flip the gender of something written by a better writer. Look ma, virtue signalling!
/r/MensRights05/06/23 05:14 AM
3

I agree. The meaning of the word respect has been butchered, and not just by feminists. Gen-Z and Millennials seem to demand unearned respect every time I look at this fucking site. None of these dimwits seem to understand that respect is something that is earned.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 12:38 PM
6

Yeah maybe as much as 60% what a man would serve for this crime, if it sees prison at all.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 11:19 AM
4

It's only a problem if you mistakenly feel obligated to give a crap about their poorly-formed, adolescent opinions. Live your life without those assholes.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:03 PM
2

Doesn't matter if a guy sits in the CEO office, he's got to listen to his woman if he wants any pussy at all Wrong. Pussy is available to rent. It's cheaper that way and less problematic.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:33 PM
3

As an adult, it's just annoying, but for a child this must be dehumanizing. This is basically child abuse.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:28 PM
6

#BelieveAllLanguageModels
/r/MensRights21/04/23 12:01 PM
6

I don't think you've been reading. The only thing we're desperate for is for you hags to leave us alone.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:11 AM
12

This is the real point. Professional athlete picks up a woman and mysteriously it turns into assault? Or.... dare I say, is it more likely this is just yet another opportunistic false accusation from a gold-digger who knows damned well there will be zero consequences for lying? I really don't know at all, but I think the second scenario is more likely than a pro footballer needing to resort to assault to get laid.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:09 AM
11

Absolutely. Telling little boys that the future has no place for them should be considered hate speech. It should probably be considered child abuse too. More importantly the quote originates from a larger body of work that is literally hate speech. The original author suggested that the male population should be reduced to 10%. it's essentially recommending a eugenics program.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 07:10 AM
1

Are they people? Really ask yourself that question. Are they exhibiting signs of consciousness?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/23 01:51 AM
37

I bet the answer to this question will be some variation of "women most affected".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 07:27 PM
9

Usually if you see programmers tweaking the responses after the basic model has been developed, it is because corporate lawyers and other cowards are telling them to do so. This is not a correction, but a flagrant corruption of the working of the model, and it is done to appease the same twitter-tyrants that cause every other bad decision in media: fear of feminist outrage over real world facts.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:11 AM
16

AI takes its training data from the bulk text content of the internet. The opinions of the programmers rarely matter. If you see bias in the responses, it is because there is bias on the internet. The problem is real, but a very real second problem is your complete ignorance of what AI is. You can't blame the programmers for creating a pattern recognition system that recognizes patterns.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:59 AM
15

I have yet to see the supposedly stereotypical random "2 guys get into a fight" where a shit-talking girlfriend is not involved. It's always a mouthy girlfriend starting a fight she knows she won't have to finish.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/23 08:32 PM
4

The saddest people are usually the most perceptive ones. Only the delusional are happy. For evidence, please see religion.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:42 AM
9

It's just as bad when advice is given. I had to listen to some blue-hair tell me "what you need to understand...." about 20 times recently, as if her opinion was so indecipherable that me, a mere man, could not understand her stupid hypocritical, self-contradictory gaslighting bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:41 PM
8

It's nice to read, but what do you bet the end result will be about 40% less sentencing time, as per usual.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:51 AM
5

They need to use euphemisms like "burnout" instead of "irresponsibly quitting the job she was hired to do". Men don't get to quit: they've got alimony to pay. But doubtless feminists will try to turn this into another wage gap farce whereby men are earning more... you know because they didn't "burn out".
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:49 AM
1

The subject material is trivial. Almost no thinking is required. When a woman is arguing with a child, they have less chance of being able to call B.S. These are all very attractive things to narcissists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 06:30 AM
10

It's actually scary how people who have such a highly valued job that should have really intelligent people being employed Think about this. These people were supposedly smart enough to get into college, then med school. Yet they couldn't read the terms of a student loan agreement and now want daddy and all the other daddies to pay off their loans. Meanwhile affirmative action for women marches on.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 06:27 PM
4

"So you're admitting that women are more likely to be hyperbolic attention-whores who are willing to do anything for attention?" Something like that.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:59 PM
7

So, this is probably not big news for anyone here, but I am positively surprised that CNN is actually addressing men's issues. Sure but if you actually watch the report you'll see that they've chosen to dwell on the effect rather than acknowledging the cause: feminist narcissism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 08:09 AM
4

It depends on what you mean by good. The majority of the women hired at my company are barely competent. As in hire-able, but as a last option. They did not deserve to be at that job when 10 other excellent male applicants applied first. Women vastly overestimate their competence. This is obvious in my industry which runs things called unit-tests against code written by women. It's an objective software test to make sure the thing they wrote does the thing it's supposed to do. It doesn't care ab…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 03:27 PM
2

More and more men are happy to do 100% of the chores if it frees them from having to pay for a freeloading girlfriend/wife/anchor who will find ways to complain about where the toilet seat lands after use.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 03:29 PM
77

It's not hard to find women. I just don't like the narcissists they've turned themselves into. Not dating is a simply a less annoying option.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:03 PM
3

Never met a gen-z who wasn't a little whiner. Without reading the entire wall of whine, I assume this is one.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:59 AM
4

There are some legitimately funny women out there, but they're not boring their audience with feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 07:57 AM
14

Did you know that you can kick a cell phone sitting on the ground over 20 yards if you really lean into it? It's not as aerodynamic as a football or soccer ball, but it hits the wall with more satisfaction.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:10 AM
3

You mean the culture that excuses rape when it's a female pedophile? The one that doesn't give women jail time and doesn't even call it rape when a woman does it? Not fond of it.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:09 AM
27

Title IX only applies in federally funded schools.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:01 AM
2

I was about to say "ooops sorry", but I don't think that changes my comment significantly. UK women are about the same, or so I hear.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 06:05 PM
1

It's not over for you because you're 28, it's over for you because you live in the U.S. and will therefore be dating american women.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:04 PM
89

The more women in your department, the more you will be expected to pick up after their incompetence.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 03:10 PM
39

Then we start male only gyms. Problem solved. “No hoes, just bros” put that on the front door lol This should absolutely happen. The gym, I mean. The sign is cute, but the gym would be great. Feminists will scream, like they always do, but we can just silently point at "Curves" and show them the door.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 02:23 AM
2

I was dispensed a boat-load of soy-boy fury for simply asking if there had been some kind of conviction yet. Is this really a controversial stance? That we might go ahead and wait to see what the court even decides before weighing in on the events that will likely end this guy's career? I don't have any idea, or opinion, one way or the other, but there is this thing called due-process....
/r/MensRights26/01/23 04:06 AM
53

E-Z Mode
/r/MensRights25/01/23 07:55 AM
7

It was probably a joke to cut the tension and relax her, but the self-absorbed whiner is so incapable of recognizing humor she instead decided to shit the bed with this post.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 09:33 AM
2

People don't say that. Feminists sometimes do, but not people.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 05:45 PM
2

The boil down to "be polite the way I tell you to and please top poking holes in my paper-thin arguments". So you're half right.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 05:16 PM
3

The people you have no intention of interacting with have more rules for you. Delightful.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 05:13 PM
23

E-Z mode.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:14 AM
5

Because it's the one and only response they can remember.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 02:58 AM
1

As near as I can tell the ONLY response is to ignore them.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 02:55 AM
7

No WE can't. They can though. Apparently.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:51 AM
57

Yep. I think women should certainly have the right to an abortion, it's just absurd that the man doesn't have a right to his own future.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:23 PM
42

Claim victory. You got everything you wanted.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:20 PM
21

Confirmed. My boss used to actively push me to hire women even when no qualified options were available. I work in tech. (For myself now, so that I don't have to deal with this crap.) There are sometimes qualified women in the available pool, but not in the volume that is typically required to fill seats without shortchanging perfectly qualified men who got there first.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 09:21 PM
0

The problem isn't the topic, it's that woke writers have no imagination. Their work is always shitty. To them story = beat on the white guy. I have a working hypothesis that the reason for this is simply technology. The ability to easily search the internet for ideas has led to 2 generations of people who are unable to formulate their own ideas. This is the reason there is nothing of any value being produced on TV right now. Millennials are the show-runners, and they are dull, dull people.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 01:25 PM
2

Ugh. Ideologues are such shitty writers. I say just lie. "A thing came up, oh no! I can't make it to your masturbatory amateur-hour propaganda...."
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 01:22 PM
3

Andrew Tate is to the Men's movement what AOC is to democrats: An annoying, shrill irritation of mixed messages that shouldn't be part of the team. This guy needs to quit "helping".
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 07:07 PM
20

I would rather we be asking why women are graded easier. I want standards to rise, not fall.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 10:23 AM
1

Only a feminist conclude that the act of moving away from your workplace constitutes working more.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:33 PM
10

My hurts are more important than your hurts because I am special. Because I hurts.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 06:22 PM
35

It's math. She's a woman. The feminists beat all that out of her at a young age.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 06:15 PM
2

That'd be true if they were actually taking any responsibilities. Call me when women start doing the dangerous jobs.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 07:38 AM
6

Women have 14% more time to kill on the internet when they're not bothering to work as hard as men. It gives them time to complain about men earning a little more because they work 14% more hours.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 07:29 PM
2

Sounds like an ideologue trying to pretend that's all the qualifications she needs to run a business. Basically the same problems as any TV or movie studio right now. It's just basic human incompetence but the excuse du jour is feminism.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:00 PM
2

But you don't work in the same fields as men. You want to work in the cushy jobs but are nowhere to be found when a power line goes down or a city sewer needs repair. There are no feminists advocating for equal hiring practices in blue-collar jobs. I still can't hear the sounds of feminists demanding women to register with the selective services either. There's a whole lot of "equality of outcomes" when the outcome is a cushy job, but when the outcome is an obligation to society as a whole, with…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:59 AM
1

When you are dating an american woman, you are dating a person who requires your body to help fill specific roles in her instagram shots. "Laughing boyfriend" "Some wacky stuff I did around the house with <insert man>" Even the marriage she claims to want is really more about the wedding and the accompanying social clout that it entails. Everything she does is aimed at making herself the center of attention. It is the very reason she exists and you are only a prop to facilitate this goal. You ar…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 12:05 PM
1

Why does it even need to be a competition? Men and women are going through oppression over there, just in different ways. There’s no need for us to try compare and contrast the two, or to chalk women’s oppression down to wearing a bedsheet, or whatever that commenter said. It needs to be a competition because you have decided to make it one by insinuating that men do not have problems in these countries and emphasizing women to the exclusion of men. As usual.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 09:06 AM
2

"Woman most affected"?
/r/PussyPass28/12/22 08:37 AM
1

It's a place you can go where no women will bother you for just one hour of peace. Or it used to be.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:51 PM
55

Point out that they asked you a question, you provided the explanation and that you're a man, which is probably why you knew the answer. Then accuse them of woman-not-knowing-the-answer-ing. The times I've been accused of this were always IMMEDIATELY after somebody physically asked me to explain something.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 10:52 AM
1

Unless the math problems on the test demand that you convert all lengths to units exactly as long as your dick, there is no way to make a differential equation care about your gender.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 10:40 AM
68

It's a math test. When women start complaining that math is sexist they are literally complaining about the universe.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 09:36 PM
8

Correct, it is a scripted show. The behavior shown, presented as comedy, is unacceptable. The point is that if the genders were reversed it wouldn't be accepted EVEN as comedy. It would result in a twitter-storm followed by corporate apologies and accusations of misogyny with zero recognition of the satire. Nobody denies that this is intended to be satire, and I have no real problem with this particular skit because you are right, it is intended to satirize the situation. The problem is that the…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:56 AM
3

I'm not a big fan of Lemon, but this is an objectively correct statement.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 08:30 PM
1

Yes, the women of Iran bravely protested a fashion conundrum by asking their men to go die and be arrested. Such bravery. It takes a brave, brave woman to sit on a couch while men fight her fights for her.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 05:48 AM
85

Yup. This guy too. He's too un-lesbian and un-black to get any press.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 02:19 PM
16

If you put stupid in, you'll get stupid out. AI isn't magic, it's just math.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:56 PM
9

If we're so disgusting, maybe they could keep out of our spaces? Leave our fiction, games and sports alone? If I act MORE disgusting will they go away?
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:33 PM
3

If she doesn't come along on your boys trip, how is she going to make every conversation about herself?
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:31 PM
6

Because the problematic feminists are all younger, and millennials/gen-z are narcissists. The quest for clout among their fellow phone-gazing self-absorbed flotsam has driven up the rhetoric for so long that these groups have effectively reprogrammed themselves into believing their own bullshit. Stare at a phone for 8 hours a day and what you read there will eventually rub off.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:00 PM
65

My favorite is when they use terms like "brave women" when women are just the error-bars on this measurement.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:08 PM
26

I don't approach women because I might get one. Then you just need to get rid of it again.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:56 AM
2

Do it. Humor is one of our big advantages over women. I don't know why, but we're just funnier. Enjoy it.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:34 PM
2

Well, I'm hot. It happens. If you aren't or you hang around uggos, it's less likely to occur. I have been man-handled by both men and women. The women are invariably more problematic when rejected. But thanks for sharing your anecdote.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 01:22 PM
2

You are probably right but the solution is also probably right in front of you. Abandon online culture. It's not producing anything of value. You can't have a meaningful conversation with anybody because unlike in a one-on-one setting, either side can leave as soon as they start losing the argument. This is a place for cowards.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 01:17 PM
8

I'd say spread the objective evidence around which clearly contradicts their claims but these groups have clearly not responded well to evidence or we wouldn't be reading this stuff in the first place. I'd like to see some more legal action against the title IX stuff, that's what worries me more than the Heard/Depp trial results,
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 04:39 PM
20

That is why I say feminism is an industry that produces a problem, and not an ideology. It is a mechanism for keeping specialized social science professors, advocates, and lawyers in business. They need a problem or their job has no purpose, so they make sure there is one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 04:35 PM
3

Did the bank hold a gun to your head and make you sign the loan? If the answer is no, then this is yet another bailout for women. Another way for them to not have to suffer the consequences of their own decisions. These are people that are supposedly about to get a higher education but they weren't able to navigate the terms of a simple loan agreement. Now everybody who didn't decide to go to college gets to fund their poor decisions through taxes.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 04:26 PM
1

Depends on what your goals are, I suppose. I concede the chances of actually getting a job this way are small, but the chances of entertaining yourself for an afternoon are high.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:42 PM
1

This is the only thing I use tinder for. It never fails to amuse.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 12:40 PM
216

Say you identify as something else. Stare them straight in the eye at the interview and dare them to challenge your assertion that you self-identify as a Philippino grandmother.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:04 PM
3

Sounds like a fun idea for a pre-nup. Or even more fun, you could incorporate it into your vows? "Do you hereby promise to put your money where your mouth is?"
/r/MensRights15/11/22 02:11 PM
7

Another good reason not to use them. Ask them what their cut is sometime. Pro tip: When they post the job description to you with the company's name cut out, you can usually find the original posting by simply googling the job description they copy-and-pasted from the original employer's posting. Just go around them. It literally takes 3 keystrokes. Now you have an immediate bargaining advantage if you want that job because the employer is not obligated to pay you the cut they'd normally waste o…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:46 PM
8

"How tall are you?"
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:33 PM
7

The average american woman weighs 170 pounds.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:32 PM
17

It ignores the fact that companies will hire women only after some sort of scandal, leaving her to clean up a bunch of crises left and right, often with no support or backup Women are 600% more likely to get hired in the tech industry than men with equivalent experience.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:30 PM
23

Notice that men are rarely asked how they balance fatherhood and career You mean the family and career that force them to work 14% more hours as they haul women and children on their backs?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:29 PM
104

Bernie Madoff commits fraud, confesses without a bunch of "woe is me" bullshit, receives 150 years. Everybody thinks this is fair. [insert woman here] commits fraud, blames daddy, her therapist, her boyfriend, her meds, the way she was catcalled and the phase of the moon. Is going to get 15 years.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 06:22 PM
10

It ignores that women are often discouraged from pursuing certain majors and trades, including blue collar jobs An often cited, but bullshit factoid. Interestingly even if it WERE true, which it definitively is not, it would still not be relevant because legally women can do whatever they want, "discouragement" or no. The system is set up for fairness, if you find unfairness, you have legal recourse. The job of feminism is now done, you can retire. Women already have legal protection against thi…
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:16 PM
9

Pussy pass renewed? Looks like it's down to 15 now? Behold female privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/22 05:58 PM
62

Feminists conveniently ignore the fact that 70% of homeless are men too. Even if there are more men at the very highest levels, there are also more men at the very lowest. But then, that would be adding everything into the analysis and as we can see from the graph, feminists aren't big on math.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 05:43 PM
53

This problem exists in all forms of fiction where a female protagonist has to overcome a male antagonist. In a traditional hero's arc, there would be a credible obstacle to overcome (the antagonist). In the beginning, the hero will usually lose when pitted against the villain so as to produce some tension and drive up the stakes of the story. But if your hero is a woman, you're not going to be allowed to show her losing to a male villain... because Twitter. Therefore the male villain must always…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 06:23 PM
4

A lot of male teachers obviously. Who is this "lot of male teachers" you speak of? Men have been systematically driven out of that industry.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:27 AM
0

“Okay, boomer” is just a smarmy shithead response to people aged 50-80 right now Which is annoying because people 50-60 are Gen-X. Remember us, Gen-X, the last competent generation? The ones who built everything you can currently see? Appreciate us now, because as soon as we retire you got Millennials running the show, and experience has proven that there is no show they can run.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 01:55 PM
5

Just call them a 3. It's probably accurate.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 01:53 PM
446

Social media is primarily a vehicle for narcissists.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:19 AM
1

They're largely idiots, which makes it pretty standard for reddit.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 11:13 PM
7

That's baffling. I mean it's not because feminism == hypocrisy. But it's baffling that the courts will support this horseshit. How dare we have an objective evaluation as to whether this person is the biological father?
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 02:17 AM
9

This is the safest and most straightforward strategy. Do not linger in stupid-land.
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 02:14 AM
16

That's exactly it. I work part time at best. Haven't worked at all this year not because work isn't available or accessible but because I thought it might be fun to train for some athletic competitions and I have plenty of savings. With no other people to support, I can go for another 10 years like this before I have to consider getting a job to make ends meet. You have so much free time when you're not carrying a wife and kids on your back. Sex is still available if you want to go get it. Simpl…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:08 AM
21

Agreed. Even in the much publicized protests in Iran right now (which I support) 10x as many men are paying the price for those protests as women. There isn't a place on the globe where women don't have it easier. Even the "horror-shows" like the victims of Boko Haram in africa are the ones that got it easy since even though the women were captured, the men were simply murdered outright. There are places in the world were women are treated badly, to be sure. But in those same places men are trea…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 01:50 AM
15

Perhaps in the name of affirmative action they could recommend another 40% of female journalists we could get rid of?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 01:45 AM
17

Simply pay attention to those facts: those facts show that 90% of the journalists that were killed were men.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 01:44 AM
4

If they fought for fair laws, they failed. Why are they not continuing to fight exactly?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:03 AM
3

There were three women in my physics department, and one was a French exchange student. This was at a University of California school in the 90s. Nobody was keeping women out of those classrooms except themselves. Nobody had a problem with them. Physics homework problems are hard enough that the entire class did homework as a group, and they were involved. If anything, the women probably received extra help and maybe a little preferential treatment, but I wouldn't characterize any of them as "ba…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:53 AM
2

First wave was before I was born, but 2nd wave seemed to be about fairness to me. I was on-board at the time. Since the advent of twitter and other forms of "I'm talking at you" social media, coupled with the overabundance of the under-educated, critical-thinking-skills-lacking Millennials and Gen-Zs, the whole thing has devolved into an industry instead of a movement about fairness.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 03:48 AM
17

Yeah it's a pretty rose-colored-glasses kind of description of her behavior which was doubtlessly insufferable.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 03:43 AM
21

Since she started shitting on men as a hobby, she's noticed a drop in the number of men willing to tolerate her behavior. Go figure. Unrelated (maybe) fact: The average US woman now weighs 170 pounds.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 03:42 AM
2

You can absolutely go against them by going around them. Be good at what you do and go contract. As offices fill up with incompetent employees whose seats were filled to meet quotas, companies start to realize that their product is suffering and end up contracting out to meet the objective, real world criteria that they must to meet their obligations. This is where the contractor thrives, on the incompetence of the in-house staff.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:37 PM
5

Honest question: What exactly is going through that woman's mind? She referenced religion, so nothing of her own. She's parroting the last thing she heard.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:41 PM
2

Don't let them intentionally conflate "wage gap", "pay gap" or "earnings gap". When comparing male vs. female employees BY THE SAME JOB, there is virtually no wage-gap, meaning they get almost the same salary. I think there was indeed a very small wage gap discovered, and it was in the realm of 1-3%. In my opinion, this is the real problem. This number should be zero. The earnings gap does exist, but that's just a mathematical feature of multiplying the MORE hours that men work by the roughly eq…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:43 PM
7

Spectacular summary,
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:34 PM
1

Fun fact if it comes up: it turns out the lesbian couples are more likely to have domestic violence issues than any other pairing.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:10 AM
31

Also note that 70% of homeless people are men. There are more men at the top AND bottom which (to my mind) only indicates that women are more chickenshit with their risk-taking.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:06 AM
6

It does kinda sound like a parody, her answer is just too intentionally cunty.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:04 AM
1

Ye gads, this reads like parody.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:03 AM
33

That's why more women go. They are being funded by a man somewhere, usually Daddy. Or enjoying the abundance of women-only scholarship opportunities.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:01 AM
13

How many scholarships are available only to men? And only to women?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:00 AM
31

I think we can do better. Like maybe 60%.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:54 AM
9

If half of the crimes that women commit never lead to sentencing due to systemic female privilege, then the 'men commit more crimes' statistic is not so useful, yeah?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:00 PM
10

I was briefly on Tinder before I understood what a shitshow it is. My response to every woman asking me how tall I was: "I dunno, 6-ish, how big are your tits?" Somehow I was being a sexist pig when I did that, but she was not. I'd like to say that one or two of them caught the hypocrisy but they didn't. They won't. They simply lack that capacity.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:34 PM
4

I think it was novel new way for gen-z narcissists who aren't attractive to get the attention mommy and/or daddy denied them. Look what you've done. Every brain cell I spend thinking about the needs of gen-z narcissist douchebags is a brain cell I need to go kill with alcohol.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:31 PM
13

To be fair, that would explain a lot of feminist statistics. Maybe they just don't do numbers good.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:28 PM
28

I was called an incel once whilst talking about something that happened to my girlfriend. Feminists can't even keep their insults straight any more.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 05:12 PM
25

70% of homeless people have the privilege of being men.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 05:06 PM
77

Almost right. It's marketed towards women who buy for their men... using the money their men earned.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:47 PM
3

I would love it if they'd follow through with this threat.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 07:36 AM
6

Just because you don't like the comment, that doesn't necessarily make it hate speech. Pass that around to the rest of the snowflakes.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 07:33 AM
-4

Read it, and your own comment again. I don't have the time or fingerpuppets to explain it to you, and frankly if you're that confused there's probably no point. You are trying to have it both ways.... and sound like a feminist in so doing.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:14 AM
5

Every second you spend trying to figure out why feminists do what they do is a second you can't get back.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:07 AM
9

I'm a liberal, and probably was considered a feminist for most of my adult life. Then one day, my friend gets a new girlfriend who was younger (Millennial shithead), who suddenly had all kinds of problems with me because (a) I'm a white man and (b) I was a few years older than her (Gen-X, the last competent generation). She knew nothing about my history but simply applied the indoctrination she'd been taught, so I started looking at what makes her tick. Bullshit. Bullshit is what makes her tick.…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:08 AM
-6

Very left wing/Democratic take on a woman's abuse. Conservitards need to pick a lane. They're either for free speech or against it. In every single other current discussion they want it with no limits (being against cancel culture, etc), but apparently right here, only on this thread you're against it. Make up your mind. I genuinely don't care which way you go but your argument is internally inconsistent.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:00 AM
16

A lifetime of feminism has taught them that the game IS complaining. A solved problem is a problem you can no longer complain about. They would lose their favorite hobby.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 04:03 PM
0

Interesting question. Would more productively be framed around a very likely imminent civil war. In that not-hypothetical-enough situation, I will have to decide who to fire at, and the choice is not so easy. Do I shoot at the literal fascists on the right? Or do I shoot at the people on the left that are caricatures of human beings? Probably the fascists are worse, because, you know... fascism. But I kind of want to shoot leftwards too at the next soccer mom who tells me what words are good and…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:49 PM
1

Not sure why you took a statement about feminists not being what they advertise as and tried to make a semantic argument. I assume it's because you simply lack the capacity to form any argument. I accept your surrender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/22 06:04 AM
0

I've seen many right-wing people trolling on behalf of Putin. Your assholes are just as bad as our assholes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/22 02:50 PM
7

Poland says no. I believe they were being turned away at the border.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/22 02:48 PM
16

It's like they've somehow forgotten the fascists in Italy and the UK...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 07:37 PM
-11

Because it was required to answer her question. These people are being assholes because of their views on health care. They are assholes.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:34 PM
-26

If your husband wasn't somehow the bad guy, your conservative friends would have to admit that their prehistoric ideas about health care are flawed, and that maybe the rest of their political views might be in question. They are used to opposing ideas because the opposition is somebody they don't like, not because of the facts of the issue, so your husband has to turn into somebody they don't like. Short story: Don't hang around conservatives. They are stupid assholes. Sorry you had to find out …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:22 PM
8

Right now, 10x as many men as women are being arrested in Iran on behalf of a legitimate feminist issue. You wouldn't know that if you read the hyperbolic man-hater subreddits, or even regular journalism. Even the most credible news sources de-emphasize this point by asking feminists to do the one thing they cannot do: Math. Example: "Over 700 'people' arrested including 60 women"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/22 01:00 AM
9

There are women being murdered in Iran right now, is your masculinityreally that fragile that you have to take attention away from that? Not sure it's going to matter with this gem of human accomplishment, but 10x as many men are being arrested in Iran for these protests. Once again, it's men doing the heavy lifting on behalf of women while that entitled asshole in your group complains from half a world away.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/22 10:12 PM
7

This man is straw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 05:11 AM
9

I refuse to accept that the people who refer to themselves as feminists fit the definition of feminism as it was explained to me. I was on board with feminism when it was simply about fairness. That seemed ok to me, but that's definitely not what it is now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 05:08 AM
5

No child left behind. You just described and explained Millennials.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:12 PM
7

That article is standard bait and switch. Acknowledge men have problems, then avoid culpability by blaming men for the problems that are clearly caused by systemic matriarchy and female privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 05:23 PM
1

Because women don't take accountability for their behavior, but fortunately to them men are disposable. It's pretty straightforward.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 05:21 PM
8

The people that currently characterize themselves as feminists are actually female supremacists. It is more profitable for the news and media to propagate the current narrative, so it will perpetuate. This is a clearly a matriarchy we live in. I've checked out too. There's nothing on the right but fascism and xenophobia, and the left, though slightly less annoying, is the home of people more concerned about pronouns than climate, health care, or endless war. Frankly, after 30 years of liberal ac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 12:26 PM
7

That'd be fine if the people that currently identify as feminists weren't actually female supremacists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/22 12:23 AM
3

That's the agenda-based addition of these hack writers. In the most recent episode they took this same guard character and made him a straight-up murderer instead of (as in the source material) accidentally killing the same person during some stupid jousting incident. The screenwriters are working hard to portray this character as a dumb violent man instead of the survivor of sexual abuse, because that screenwriter (a woman) has an explicit, hamfisted agenda, the same exact agenda littering basi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/22 12:17 AM
1

Thank you, that's been my problem. I need to choose between traditional fascism or this fascism-lite?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:56 PM
2

What do you think #MeeToo was? It was digital lynching and an abandonment of due process.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:54 PM
4

Is something broken? The man will have to fix it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/22 06:20 PM
1

The show was interesting and popular enough that everybody felt the urge to hang their agendas on it. In this instance, as in virtually every other instance where feminism intersects with pop culture, they were trying to ride on the coattails of more imaginative thinkers. If you look at the current pop culture offerings, none present a more complex narrative than: woman good, man bad. The last 5 years clearly illustrate what happens when feminists try to write stories artificially constructed to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/22 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter