TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

antoninj Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by antoninj on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Having read through more of them, it looks more like a satire than something serious. Some of them, I get. But others? I'm not sure wtf is up with those, such as: "I need feminism because there is no need for me to have rewards cards for 3 different beauty stores" "I need feminism because nobody takes my superhero novels seriously" "i need feminism because I don't know how to cook (and don't want to)" "I need feminism because women are the most affected by climate change" "I need feminism becaus…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:25 PM
5

So, what's interesting is this: "man (men) only" is listed to use "with caution" but has an asterisk about usage when it can be used. "woman (women) only" is listed to use "with caution" as well under same asterisk "male(s) only" is listed as not acceptable (but still with asterisk permitting use) "female(s) only" is list to use "with caution" under the same asterisk as all the others. Looks more like either a mistake or someone had hastily edited the document rather than out of malice. All of t…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:10 PM
2

But it mentions both genders?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:48 PM
12

I was trying to find what the OP was referring to and I think I found a similar source: http://www.mvfairhousing.com/pdfs/ad-word-list.pdf This is for Miami Valley. It looks like they created a specific word ban list from advertising that's in compliance with their own rules. It's quite possible that OP may be living in an area or may be buying/selling with an agency, or whatever else, that created its own list of banned keywords in advertising. And while this list may state "in compliance with …
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:12 PM
2

Ahh! I see! Thanks for the clarification :)
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:19 PM
3

unfortunately, that is not the case in the US. The police is legally able to intimidate you, misinform you, conveniently "forget" things you've said, make things up (in which case it's your word against theirs), etc. etc. Someone else in the thread already posted a video on why you should never talk to the police. You're fortunate that your laws work differently.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:03 PM
7

Just assume it's with respect to x since there is no y involved and dy is not declared.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter