TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

antprince Archive

View 21 posts and 241 comments by antprince on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
258

Feminismantprince/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:13 PM
235

antprince/r/MensRights01/07/18 11:51 AM
232

Discriminationantprince/r/MensRights13/12/18 04:58 PM
138

Discriminationantprince/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:01 PM
97

Edu./Occu.antprince/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:18 AM
86

antprince/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:51 PM
86

Edu./Occu.antprince/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:05 AM
76

Edu./Occu.antprince/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:22 AM
57

antprince/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:25 PM
42

Social Issuesantprince/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:36 PM
36

Legal Rightsantprince/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:33 PM
33

antprince/r/MensRights28/06/18 09:55 PM
32

Feminismantprince/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:58 PM
23

Social Issuesantprince/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:21 AM
22

Social Issuesantprince/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:47 PM
19

antprince/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:56 PM
7

Social Issuesantprince/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:51 PM
7

Social Issuesantprince/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:26 PM
3

antprince/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:52 PM
1

Marriage/Childrenantprince/r/MensRights20/12/18 03:58 PM
0

Feminismantprince/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:38 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Women yes, girls no. It's interesting that feminists portray domestic violence as a uniquely male phenomenon even though we now know that women are more likely to abuse children, including girls. We also now know that girls do much better with their fathers. This means that feminism is extremely harmful to females, but "feminists" don't care. It's all about "me me me me" in the moment for adult women. Shortsighted. Won't last.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:49 AM
9

Congratulations! You're a feminist!
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:29 PM
1

You don't need to worry about it unless you're Canadian.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:27 PM
-3

Yertle the Turtle? It's a damn fine book.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:25 PM
1

White knights should be mocked, not beaten. They should be driven into the wild. Then we can all have a hearty laugh. lol.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:24 PM
4

Um, well, Canada is run by banks and corporations, not Castro. But thanks for playing lol.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:23 PM
4

Okay well I can agree with that. But I think there's a tendency to attack "deadbeat dads" when in fact about 99 percent (yes, I stand by that stat) are good dads. Moreover, if you give fathers equal rights they will be more likely to support their children.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:22 PM
-5

Not enough....not enough.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:51 PM
2

Indeed. that was a fair fight, unless it was a female, but I assume they had contingencies for that.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:51 PM
4

And ironically YOU are over-dramatizing. Muslims? I grew up in Van., with Chinese people immigrating. And cutting down all the trees and putting up big ugly pink houses. If you've ever wanted to create an anti-imm campaign, talk to people in Vancouver. But meh I don't really care and moved to Vancouver Island. But yeah when I was a kid that shit pissed me off. Anyway, I like you comics. I'll tell you what's sinister: I think it's sinister that America/Israel/Britain has killed about 8 million Mu…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:46 PM
2

I was in the geology club in college. Shoulda been in the feminist club. Zing! hehehe.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:38 PM
-5

paragraph breaks help.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:37 PM
29

This guy's media's.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:36 PM
3

Throw away the key? They would have congratulated her. "Good job raping that boy bitch! Now on to the next one!"
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:35 PM
1

Russia. And that's with no "Buzzfeed" or CIA shenanigans.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:09 PM
3

No I meant prove your guilt, because honestly there's not much way around it, if there is a dispute.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:08 PM
6

Now I don't normally link to this guy because he's a pretty hardcore MGTOW, but Karen Straughan links to him, and here he is. Here's the John the Other talking about this incredible Canadian law: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Clyd70qkuU Canucks, you're fucked.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:48 PM
3

She may well be a lying bitch.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:20 PM
1

Russia
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:41 PM
3

I might be able to dig it up, but suffice it to say that official studies have already demonstrated that women are about twice less likely to be charged for a crime, and receive on average 60 percent less jail time. The study I mentioned didn't even take into account arrest rates. Can you imagine if every mother was charged when she abused her child? The prisons would be overflowing with women. So that it is a real example of what feminists call "institutional oppression" -- against men. As oppo…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:40 PM
12

This is utter insanity. A study in the UK determined that if women were treated like men, about half of all prisoners would be female. This is feminism embarking on the ends of insanity, just to see how far men are willing to simp. Well, keep going gents.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:02 PM
-2

Yes, there are a lot of dead beat dads out there Evidence? You piece of shit? Slandering fathers?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:00 PM
3

A toddler in England who was tortured to death. [Using the most extreme means: like the new "father" got a dog to attack the child -- that's how brutal it was. The whole thing is just so obscene I feel bad talking about it]. But the original father wanted custody.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:03 PM
1

I don't think there's any redemption here. The baby was tortured to death. Where is the redemption? There is none.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:00 PM
1

"mods remove this troll." Lol you really are quite the little authoritarian aren't you? lol. Certainly Marx had at least as much in common with Jefferson. You're just a little ideologue.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:11 PM
1

Leftism is a mental illness That's lazy, lazy thinking. The most allegedly intelligent people who have ever lived, including Einstein and Hawking, are all leftists; now maybe they are "mentally ill", or maybe they see something you don't. At the very least, even the conservative Jordan Peterson claims that leftist thought is essential. So I think you're just being lazy.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:46 PM
0

And yet you feel oppressed.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:06 PM
1

do believe in Ultimate Multiverse Theory Damn. That's really fucking brutal. I hope you have sedatives or something.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:15 PM
3

That's what Marx posits. Um, to be honest, I don't think you've read Marx. I'm not a Marxist, but I've actually read him, and that seems to separate much of us. That's why he's responsible for this thinking that ALL interactions are between oppressed and their oppressors . Again, this is basically the same idea of classical liberalism ("tyranny of the majority"), so if that's the basis for formulating your beliefs, look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:09 PM
-3

Again, pretty much every political philosophy finds an "oppressor." Yours is not a valid argument. And I say all this finding the Soviet Union an atrocity. So try better.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:04 PM
4

I don't think think it's fair to accuse Marx of all this. It would be like accusing Locke or Hobbes of being responsible for the atrocities of colonialism and capitalism. Most (all?) political philosophies have an oppressor/oppressed dynamic. That includes classical liberalism; for the classical liberal, the "tyranny of the majority" was a major concern.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 06:31 PM
6

I'm not a Marxist but I disagree that their theories are "Marxist." Marx barely talked about gender, and has been condemned by feminists ever since.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:41 PM
6

The CBC supports feminism/ID politics and also supports imperialism/war/corporate power. Not difficult to understand if you understand power.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:15 PM
56

There was a study in the UK recently revealing that about 50 percent (!) of single mothers feel it unnecessary that their children have any contact with their biological fathers. From the POV of about half of women in our glorious feminist society, men are basically interchangeable cogs in a machine. Walking wallets. Don't like one bloke? Just pick another, the child won't know the difference. Wrong, wrong, wrong. In his epic study The Boy Crisis, Warren Farrell notes that children who have freq…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:59 PM
2

I never said "Americans" are "cool with it." CIA etc. works with kiddy fuckers and drug lords around the world, and that's nothing new.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:23 PM
7

Disturbing material
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:22 PM
2

Feminists are in the process of ruining the social sciences. Yes, we all know that disciplines like sociology are not as rigorous as STEM etc. But on the other hand, a study by two Swedish professors recently revealed that "gender studies" drags down other disciplines; they found that gender studies is less scientific and more biased than any other field. So it casts disrepute on related fields.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:20 PM
0

Um, I'm pretty sure most leftists are appalled at this garbage too. Sort of like we were when the US Army used this shit in Afghanistan to sway opium lords.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:08 PM
103

I wonder if men are more likely to be killed on the job because they are more likely to work dangerous jobs? In the case of custody there's an easy solution: equal parenting rights.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:03 PM
19

Ever get the impression you're an actor in a really bad Black mirror episode? (feminist special)
/r/MensRights16/12/18 04:00 PM
4

So..."women and children"?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 03:31 AM
1

What are you talking about? Edmund Kemper's a sweetheart.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 03:14 AM
3

Unfortunately they were never really taken to task Well I think that's starting to change. Gradually.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:41 AM
3

Bundy was not deliberately abused, so far as I'm aware (it's difficult to take these people at their word). However his mother handed him over to a hospital and he spent six months of his first year crying in a bed with no mother. Thank God we don't remember our really early years. I think that's where Bundy's psychosis came from. He later learned that the woman who raised him as "mother" was in fact his sister. Bundy's a rare example of a serial killer who wasn't overtly abused, though I suppos…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:39 AM
4

abolish the violence against women act (which is misogyny) No, VAWA is an example of misandry. It singles out females as being more deserving of sympathy and support than males. It's an echo of the misandrist Duluth model, whose authors have admitted is a fraud; they realized while conducting their study that women are just as likely to abuse men as vice versa, yet portrayed DV as a patriarchal conspiracy. Obviously very few if any politician is going to vote against something called the "violen…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:48 AM
5

Is it really that difficult to understand? In OP I said: if you we want to diminish violence against women and children and incidentally men, we need to recognize that women commit violence against children. This includes sexual violence. Pretty simple stuff. Does that mean I want female criminals to be strung up on tree branches? No. In fact I favor the Nordic model over the punitive and unnecessarily harsh American model. But we at least need to acknowledge the problem. Feminists have failed m…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:41 AM
4

Look, if you're going to call someone a "misogynist", you need to be willing to accept the consequences of such a slur. It's an awful thing to say. You're basically saying that I hate my mother, my sister, my girlfriend, my niece and several of my best friends. Do you realize how awful that is? It would be like me accusing you of hating black people, or Asian people, or tall people or whatever. It's a horrendous thing to do, and you should be aware of that. What did I do to deserve such abuse? I…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 01:19 AM
4

bullshit misogyny Wow. that was totally nto predictable and totally insightful. Look, instead of running around virtue signaling and calling people "misogynists", you should take a long, long look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:43 AM
6

"The law"? I support some laws and oppose others. Eg in Alabama it's illegal to have "bear matches" (a sensible law) but another that prohibits "wearing masks in public". Well Halloween is apparently a crime spree, and there are a whole lotta kids who should be fined and/or in jail. The law is what you make of it. MLK rejected the law to positive effect. Others -- the majority -- adhere to law to positive effect. Principle above law, every time.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:42 PM
7

Indeed.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 09:53 PM
9

Agree. And as to your initial point, I think it's as simple as "well they're bigger and stronger." That's it. And that is true. It would be more true if we were living in a hunter gatherer society. As it is, every woman has the power of the state behind her: not just men, but men with guns, and even more important, authority.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 09:34 PM
7

? I'm not advocating violence against anyone! That's my entire point: violence begets violence, and we should raise children with that in mind.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 09:29 PM
1

That's a...profound question. But I hope the answer never comes to pass. Women are indeed wonderful.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:27 PM
1

US aid to Israel is a human rights atrocity.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:13 PM
33

I made the provocative statement above: Do feminists actually care about stopping violence/rape against women? Apparently not, otherwise they would be obsessed with the issue of woman-on-child abuse. This really seems to be true. There have been dozens of studies demonstrating that most male rapists were sexually abused by women as children. And pretty much every social scientist agrees that abused children are more likely to grow up to be abusers. Pedophilia is particularly troubling in this re…
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:07 PM
18

I would have no problem with the ad folks using women in the their adverts, provided the money went to where it is needed most. But it isn't. Homeless women are treated like people in need, homeless men are treated like scum. Even though men make up the vast majority of rough sleepers. There are even "women only" shelters. This is obscene. Homelessness itself is obscene. There is no reason why an advanced society should have homeless people; it's just disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:46 AM
9

Fuck this. Bowing at the heads of Google for a doodle? That's just incredibly lame.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 09:26 AM
1

Gotta be honest here brah. I seduced your sister/mother/aunt. It was a helluva a four-way.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 06:19 AM
1

Some Youtube post.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:21 AM
3

I do spend too much time on Reddit. Yes, you do.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:17 AM
4

70 percent. Just a rough guess.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:04 AM
5

Right. Exactly.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:02 AM
2

How is that to treat a lil' fellow leprechaun? WTF? To be honest though, I'd really like to get my hands on that study. It's a real rarity. Imagine female judges being blamed for something! It's almost surreal. But yeah, as soon as you find it, I'd appreciate if you forwarded it to me. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:44 AM
3

Heh. Seinfeld is sometimes funny. I'm not sure how else to put it. But to be honest, you've obviously unplugged, and that's better for your mental and physical health. Cheers. :)
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:41 AM
-1

Keep surfing this sub, maybe it will be posted again, lil' guy.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:35 AM
4

One of my favorite Seinfeld episodes..
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:31 AM
9

Worked in office for a time. Can confirm.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:22 AM
6

brilliant analogy.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 01:11 AM
6

Holy shit. I can't fucking believe this interview. The ABC guy just completely debases himself. He keeps replaying the clip of the misandrist bitch calling men pigs and morons as if it works in his favor! "She didn't say all men. She just said men!" OReally? If I said "blacks are thieves!" or "Jews cause all wars!" that would be okay? Rather than "all blacks are thieves or all jews cause all wars*? Give me a fucking break. The amazing thing about the tone of the interview is the sheer level of s…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 01:05 AM
35

Pretty sure women are more likely to engage in these behaviors than men. Female abusers specialize in emotional abuse. Turns the children against you...uh yeah.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:44 AM
5

Seriously. I'm not in the habit of using the word "cucked" but white male film critics? C'mon. They even praised that star wars shit. It would be funny if this caused more of them to grow some balls and start giving a thumbs down to feminist films. Alas, I don't think that's gonna happen.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:39 AM
16

Princess and the Pea...
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:36 AM
13

She literally referred to men as "pigs". Misandrist cunt doesn't have a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:34 AM
2

The judges ruled that “in the case of three major children, after the passage of a long period of time, the DNA test cannot be used as a shortcut to establish infidelity that might have occurred decades ago”. Is this peak gynocracy? I sure hope so. I can't imagine men being any more degraded. Despicable.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:04 AM
0

Proud Boys are a bunch of latent homosexual fascists just like their founder. They are top tier cringe material. Basically the right wing equivalent of AntiFa.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:00 AM
5

These bitches be cray cray. Your movie sucked balls. Get over it.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:52 PM
10

He thinks the government is controlling his thoughts, as per another post. He's mentally ill. The media will do as the media does, which is toe the party line and attack MRA's (strange for a "patriarchy", no?). We are no more responsible for his actions than feminists are responsible for the latest mother who murders her children.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:51 PM
2

Pretty sure Australia has men and women. It isn't just about the kangaroos, mate.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:46 PM
6

Depends on the leftist. Not all righties support perpetual war, and not all lefties support equality. It is completely and utterly absurd to claim that the multinational corporation Google (which has extensive ties to the US intelligence bureaucracy, as noted by Assange and others) is "leftist."
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:45 PM
1

PinkOld2 hours ago "Bottom line here: Feminazis are perfectly free and clear to be strutting bigots against men, while men are expected to be obsequious, fawning, mewling little supplicants."
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:42 PM
12

David’s refusal to back down is only bettered by the way he took his defiance to the next level each time he was interviewed. When he appeared on the notoriously feminist program, “The Project” (home of Lisa Wilkinson who delivered the “all men are guilty rant” I covered in the article The Beginning of the End) he defended a tweet in which he called Angela Bishop a ‘bigoted bitch’ for refusing to allow a male panelist on Studio Ten explain exactly what the term misandry means. This guy is a fuck…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:08 PM
5

Muslims do not believe in "stoning women who are raped." There are one billion Muslims in the world. A tiny number of extremely backward primitive tribal societies kill women for the "crime" of adultery. This was also true of ancient Christian/Judaic/other societies. Why do they do this? They do this because adultery is the one female sin that males take seriously; if a woman cheats then you become a cuckold. Studies show that when a man learns that he is raising someone else's son, the trauma i…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:02 PM
6

He has also posted conspiracy theories about government mind control and the moon landing. The guy's mentally ill. No connection to the MRM.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:37 PM
5

There is nothing "leftist" about Google's racism and sexism. If Google was leftist they would support labor unions.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:29 PM
11

This woman should be serving life in prison -- twice. A false rape accusation is just as bad -- if not worse -- than actual rape. It entails slander, assault, and forcible confinement for potentially decades. What a joke of a system we have. Men are second class citizens.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:21 PM
12

I'm sorry but I feel like you're being really abusive, please STOP THAT.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:10 PM
8

Alas, this isn't actually true. There was a study posted on this sub revealing that female judges are, on average, even more lenient towards female criminals than male judges. I was surprised too, as I assumed female judges would be exceptions to the rule.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:05 PM
4

I disagree. This will bring my vote down but I don't give a shit. At least 6 million (and probably many more millions) of Muslims have been killed due to Western imperial interventions since 9/11. Moreover, western powers have been funding and arming these fruitcake nuts since the 50's. Not a single civilian death is justified -- but if you arm nuts, you're gonna get burned.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:50 PM
3

Where do you find this kinda stuff? Mostly online. When I hear a new claim I try to verify it; about 90 percent of the time I find that it's a disputed theory; however, some theories have a few relevant critics, and some theories have thousands....
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:21 PM
1

You poor dear. Never-mind people (including women and children, whom you presumably care about) having their limbs blown off and being slaughtered in Yemen. No, let's talk about about "awkward shoulder massages!"
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:07 PM
2

So long as they aren't forced to do so. Conscription is a clear violation of the 13th amendment's prohibition against involuntary servitude, but the courts ruled otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:39 PM
2

:)
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:18 PM
3

affected is the correct word I put "micro-aggressions" in quotes for a reason.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:11 PM
7

He should go whole hog and invite Karen Straughan down from Canada ;)
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:46 PM
3

Fucking A. I love Bettina.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:44 PM
15

It is time for men and women to be granted anonymity in the case of sexual assault claims. There are simply too many false accusations flying around. It is obscene that a person can have their life completely destroyed based on a false accusation.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:43 PM
14

Wife beating wasn’t considered a violent crime in just the very recent past. This is plain bullshit. "In America, there have been laws against wife beating since before the Revolution. By 1870, it was illegal in almost every state; but even before then, wife-beaters were arrested and punished for assault and battery. The historian and feminist Elizabeth Pleck observes in a scholarly article entitled "Wife-Battering in Nineteenth-Century America": "It has often been claimed that wife-beating in n…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:38 PM
6

I only had so much space. It's all just horrific.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:37 AM
5

Yep.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 05:26 AM
1

Fair points.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 05:00 AM
8

There are all sorts of women's issues, but none will be solved by feminism. That's my position.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:43 AM
6

Indeed.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:11 AM
2

Well, duh, of course most women in the past had to work. If there are feminists who claim otherwise, then they’re extremely ignorant Evidently there are an enormous number of ignorant feminists out there, because the claim that women weren't "allowed" to work is something I hear all the time. Perhaps you should forward your complaints to your local university gender studies department, because evidently they are teaching young women a bunch of bullshit. However, there was more to it. late 19th-2…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:29 PM
5

You said nothing. Absolutely nothing. Try again -- and this time, say something.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 09:30 PM
5

I think she's awesome too. I don't think she'll mind being called an asshole. Hell, she'll probably like it. I agree with her about 95 percent of the time on the topic of gender. But politics, not so much.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:58 PM
6

It’s not zero sum between the genders. Indeed. mostly by other men. Mostly? Does that mean that eg Queens lorded over men and ruled them with an iron fist? And what about the King's wife? She was surely whispering in his ear. Men wanted to do their duty, yes, but they also liked to see their children. There was a poem written by a pants presser in the mid-19thC that reads: In The Factory Oh, here in the shop the machines roar so wildly, That oft, unaware that I am, or have been, I sink and am lo…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:51 PM
1

Okay. But that doesn't demonstrate that eg the majority of men prefer working at 7/11. You can be dominant in all sorts of environments.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:46 PM
9

But those who wanted to work Are you talking about a career, or a job? Because 99 percent of women and men had jobs. Not careers. Women were pregnant much of the time. Men protected and provided for your sorry ass; and as soon as men invented birth control, they invited you into the workplace. The lack of appreciation here is just absolutely astonishing. You are nothing more than a spoiled brat.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:41 PM
9

Claiming that women could do what they wanted with equal opportunity is simply wrong. They were regularly denied opportunities. No more so than men. After all, in wars, men and fighting aged boys were killed, often in brutal fashion; eg during Alexander the Great's campaigns, he would crucify every man and fighting aged boy. Men were in control. No. A tiny, tiny minority of men were in control. They certainly didn't look out for the interests of other men. I encourage you to watch this short vid…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:08 PM
5

Well feel free to extrapolate. Maybe I missed your point.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:43 PM
14

Missing from the analysis is that men were the one’s deciding for women what their role would be. Nope. Women were free to decide that for themselves. Did you think women wanted to work? lol. politicians or even voters. You may want to look up the term "Queens". The average man had zero influence in comparison to e.g. Queen Elizabeth. The universal male/female vote thing is pretty recent, and women were simply given the vote without any civic obligations like conscription. Much is made of female…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:26 PM
10

Ruling class men had the time of their lives, as always. The other 99 percent? No not much, and that includes women who weren't part of the 1 percent. Not sure what else to say. I think both working class men and women had a really, really rough go of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:37 PM
11

So they could do whatever they wanted, unless they got married? -- in which case a man was responsible for all her debts? That's a pretty sweet fucking deal. Certainly, no man ever had that luxury.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:03 PM
4

weren’t allowed to work as teachers Yeah? Well how 'bout a link.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:42 PM
10

USA married women weren’t allowed to work. That sort of sentiment can only come from a deranged or childlike mind. And a profound sense of entitlement. I would rather chill at home with the kids than work on a fucking assembly line, and both male and female workers in the mid 19th C (eg) agreed. Where may I read more about the Ancient Greek women teachers? Many places. But don't expect women to come before Plato or Socrates or Zeno, because that's just not gonna happen. As women were generally b…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:32 PM
1

publicly is obviously much better than publically. Oh wait you guys agree. I'll show myself out.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:12 PM
1

Please don't cite Wikipedia. Thanks. And women have always been the primary teachers. You can even find this in Ancient Greece.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:07 PM
6

Yes, men -- as a whole -- remain honorable. But let's not pretend men have chosen the path of humiliation and degradation. "Democracy" is mostly a farce.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:55 PM
9

I think you're wrong. Look up "grass eaters".
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:53 PM
19

Amazing.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:54 PM
4

Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:29 PM
9

That will never happen. Isn't it already happening in Japan? I'm not a "MGTOW", but I wouldn't underestimate that phenomenon. If you read JD Unwin, you find that some variant of "MGTOW" has happened every time feminism became a thing. And that was before reliable birth control and abortion.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:05 PM
43

So there you have it. Women have always been "allowed" to work, but unlike men, they have had various times had the luxury of being full time housewives. Most men would love to be able to spend more time at home with the kids, but they are (justifiably) concerned that this will lead to a higher risk of divorce/alimony/losing kids. The statistics on female happiness (which has sharply declined since second wave feminism) show exactly what you'd expect them to show. Since for most people "work" is…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:02 PM
2

human resources
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:04 AM
4

A truly horrifying case and another example demonstrating how feminist societies throw away bedrock concepts of due process rights and justice in the name of women's (subjective) feelings, no matter how irrational or vindictive.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:01 PM
5

I've argued before that societies we westerners consider "horribly misogynist" are in many ways more gender egalitarian than the west. This is because in said societies both men and women suffer gender based discrimination or even oppression. Westerners are so gynocentric and brainwashed, however, that they view third world (and some second world) countries through a feminist lens. This even applies to conservatives, who in some ways are the worst offenders. A woman stoned to death in Saudi Arab…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:53 PM
5

Women already have a shorter work week on average. This is reminiscent of feminists demanding shorter prison terms for women (or the complete elimination of female prisons!) despite women already receiving significant institutional privilege in the criminal justice system. Equality my ass.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:41 PM
9

If "emotional labor" is a thing then men are the primary laborers, just like in the workplace itself. It takes much more effort to keep your emotions in check than to break down at regular intervals.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:39 PM
13

Men don't have feelings you silly man -- except for the intense desire to brutalize womyn. That's why we're all rapists.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 09:17 AM
5

It's amazing how similar feminism is to the traditional gender dynamic -- except taken to the nth degree and minus the whole "treat men and boys with honor and respect" part. They're essentially exploiting the male protective instinct. What a horrible thing to do. I'm not saying every false accusation should result in a charge or prison sentence. But if there is hard evidence of a malicious false accusation you better believe the woman should do hard time.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:57 AM
10

What a bizarre post. The author cites factors like "mental illness" as reasons why we shouldn't prosecute false rape accusers. Um, I'm pretty sure most rapists suffer "mental illness" of one kind or another; however unless they are psychotic this is irrelevant or at best a mitigating factor to be taken into account during sentencing. This is just another example of society bending over backwards to prevent holding women -- including female psychopaths -- accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 07:11 AM
35

Of course it isn't. After drinking a bunch of alcohol people can still come across as pretty normal, or only a little tipsy, yet have little or no memory of what transpired the next day. There are even cases of people who have bought plane tickets and woken up in other countries after blackouts; no one even knew they were intoxicated. Blackouts can also be compounded by certain types of prescription drugs like anti-depressants. Unless a woman is a literally unable to stand or is passed out (and,…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:10 AM
10

If she had made these comments about literally any other identifiable group she would have already been fired.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 08:47 AM
5

Superb article. Thanks for the post.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:06 AM
5

Not saying you're wrong, but I've never heard of a gender studies department being investigated under Title IX. So if anyone has a link to such a case that would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:53 PM
4

Really? Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:32 PM
10

There may well come a time when young men organize to file Title IX complaints against gender studies departments. A great many of the major feminist texts contain overt anti-male hate speech.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:23 PM
1

Dammit, I shouldn't have deleted this. It was a good post.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 08:12 AM
1

Maybe the problem is you are imagining all or most white men are what is referred to. That tends to happen when you say eg "men" or "white men" without adding a qualifier. Maybe you are not familiar with feminists' "hating" of white women and white feminists I'm well aware of it, and it's funny, because feminism has always been a rich white woman's movement. At not a single time has it helped "women of color" or even women, period. dominant groups Sorry sweetheart, but a homeless straight white …
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:05 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 11:51 PM
2

Peterson bot? Hierarchy in the Forest Good thing humans aren't lobsters, eh.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:53 PM
5

I want you to perform a few basic visual tests. First up, check out these pics and I want you to choose all the squares that have images of a platypus in them.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:41 PM
2

I still don't know whether you're a bot. I've already read the article. It was refreshing in its candor.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:33 PM
2

Because #patriarchy Are you a bot? You can tell me... Because #patriarchy ummm
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:16 PM
2

Amen.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:42 PM
4

2000 years of patriarchy. Meh, I can't be bothered replying. Good luck with the whole patriarchy thing.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:37 PM
2

Damn straight.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:27 PM
3

Yes assault and other things i mention happen to men. But they happen less, especially historically. No. They don't. And men and boys also have the added disadvantage of receiving massively less sympathy than women and girls. If what you explained about these biases is true, why are politics and power in general very male centric? Females are more risk averse, on average. And women don't need to achieve some degree of power to mate. That's the blunt truth.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:25 PM
2

I said beyond muh oppressionz dammit. [they] believe they are in a disadvantageous position Falsely there are sexist laws and this is not the case. Wrong. Western women have exactly three more rights than men (in addition to all the privileges), so the laws are indeed sexist -- against males: (1) female genital mutilation is banned (2) women can vote with zero civic obligations, most importantly conscription and (3) women can reject parenthood (while a mother can drop her unwanted baby off at a …
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:07 PM
1

No. I don't think men are superior. And I'm legitimately trying to understand a phenomenon that I consider legitimately bizarre. If you have any theories (beyond muh oppressionz) I would be happy to hear them.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 08:41 PM
6

When you generalize to all women The last line of the post is literally an anti-generalization. You're not terribly bright.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 08:34 PM
6

Think of the way a woman can date a man or marry him, and come to hate all his friends. when a woman is in love, be it romantic or maternal love, she sees the loved male as different somehow. A needle in a haystack, a soulmate, The One Good Man. That's really interesting. Corresponds with the Laurie Pennie Twitter exchange. Men are trash. But not my father.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 08:07 PM
5

Appalling.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:57 PM
3

keep up the good fight. You may find this of interest: https://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2lc9cc/dangerous_trends_in_feminism_gay_academic_union/
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:56 PM
17

SPLC just had to fork over 3 million for slandering someone. More lawsuits are probably on the way. They are not a trustworthy source. Of course it's just a bullshit excuse. Most of the big feminist academics have made incredibly hateful statements toward men, much worse than anything Paul Elam has ever said, but they aren't banned. Gay men have become the servants of lesbians. Sorry to put it so bluntly but it's true. You know that acronym LGBTQ? It used to be GLBTQ. But ladies first...
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:54 PM
3

No that's not accurate. Peter Phillips from Project Censored has noted that the main difference between the west and the Soviet Union is that people in the Soviet Union knew Pravda was mostly bullshit; people in the west (probably a slight majority) still mostly trust their news sources. In the foreword to Orwell's Animal Farm the author points out: "the sinister fact about literary censorship in England is that it is largely voluntary. Unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kep…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:47 PM
7

An important point to consider is that feminists are given MASSIVE sums of money by the billionaire class. I mean just this week we've seen JP Morgan and several other banks fund feminist causes. Make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:12 PM
6

Apologies are great -- if the person actually takes responsibility for their bad behavior. Otherwise it's just adding insult to insult. I hate to make broad generalizations, but this is an area in which women can learn something from men. Yes, some men (psychopaths in particular) also refuse to take responsibility for their actions, but by and large they are better at accepting blame when they do something wrong. I mean not even Hillary Clinton accepted responsibility for losing to Trump: she bl…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:50 PM
8

Feminism: Trojan horse for the police state
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:40 PM
4

If American men invade Iran on behalf of Israel they deserve what's coming to them.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 04:36 PM
1

It isn't misandrist at all. Yeah, yeah it is lol. The Gillian character literally describes men as "inferior" and paraphrases the SCUM Manifesto. Now if the mere character was a misandrist that would be one thing, but the goofy narration supports her view every step of the way. "The Fall" is without question the most man/boy hating populcar series in the past several years. It is utter, utter trash.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 11:17 AM
2

It's the most misandrist thing I've ever seen. I don't care if the Gillian Anderson character is fucking some guy. The "subtext" accords perfectly with the misandry.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:54 AM
3

It was nothing dramatic. He basically said, "I've dressed myself and now I will go out." Woman who responded is sick, sick, sick.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:58 AM
12

Wait 'till you see what they're trying to do with STEM. Though interestingly philosophy has always been closely linked with mathematics. Not any more, if feminists have their way.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:31 AM
-9

Sounds gay as hell, and you're trying to sell something.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:14 AM
2

Seems petty to single this post out, given the plethora of shit posts on this sub. But I support your goal of reducing the number of shitposts. Either way I don't want to have to type/copy/paste everything out again, but if you want to repost feel free.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:11 AM
13

It's painfully obvious -- at least to this non-philosophy professor -- that the young disabled man was using the word "man" to distinguish himself from a boy. Not that it should matter anyway; even if he were using language in an un-pc fashion, a fucking philosophy professor (at Oxford no less!) should have the sense to let sleeping dogs lie. Yet this piece of shit decided it was a good use of her time to bully this mentally disabled young man, because she's that insecure and hateful. Utterly di…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:00 AM
27

You'll change your tune if you watch The Fall starring Gillian Anderson. But yeah I hear you. The misandry is just everywhere. It's inescapable. The relative silence of women with sons is really peculiar to me. I just don't understand it.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:38 PM
2

Yes I assumed that was clear. I'll edit OP.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:09 PM
20

There's no such thing as a sex-positive feminist. They all demonize male sexuality to varying degrees.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:57 PM
12

Another home run by Bettina. She accurately describes feminists as a "depraved minority".
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:40 PM
1

Do I have to do all the work for you?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:14 PM
1

"the leftists." OOooh, the leftists are coming to get you. Look out -- a squirrel! lol.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:14 PM
1

lmao. funny kid.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:13 PM
0

Peterson has a beef with Chomsky Chomsky dismissed Peterson with a flick of the wrist, basically arguing that he was too boring and derivative to be worthy of reply. I don't agree. I like Peterson, which is why I linked the video on classical liberalism. You can watch it and learn something, or not. It's up to you. Cheers.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:39 AM
0

I’m glad you guys are doing such a good job of looking stupid on your own. Uh huh Well, Peterson himself made a rather embarrassing tweet recently when he asked whether Chomsky had seen his "work." I like Peterson, as I've repeatedly stated. That doesn't mean I worship him. The video I linked is indeed interesting, if you're interested in the concept of "classical liberalism."
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:22 AM
8

Your post makes the same point but with poetry. Thanks. Speaking of poems. A man who didn't often see his boy. This became a popular poem in the 19th C US among working men.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:14 AM
12

That's another thing. You'd think that the "death gap" -- by the very definition -- would be of great concern in a "patriarchal" culture that privileges men. Instead, we don't seem to care about it at all.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:04 AM
-2

Is that right? Well apologies, then.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:56 AM
2

I enjoy horror films. But this is horrific. Just absolutely appalling. I can't imagine how much the creator must have hated men and boys.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:43 AM
-7

Watch it. I think you'll find it interesting.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:39 AM
-7

Classical liberalism
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:07 AM
1

I already said: character. Well whatever, go ahead. OP was about the great Red in Shawshank. Do your worst.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:10 AM
2

Wonderful post. Just wanted to say that.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:07 AM
4

OK, not in France lol. I guess this is called self-pwnage.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:51 AM
2

lol at all the people condemning Islamists. Well if you want to curb the activities of Islamists, the single most important thing to do is to encourage your government (the US in particular) to stop funding, arming and training them. This has been going on for about 70 years now. Herp derp Muslims! Well yeah lil' guy, why not go to the source?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:47 AM
-8

Sorry to say, but Peterson really is a dunce's philosopher. But the fact that (via his opposition to ID politics) he is encouraging people to become interested in philosophy is awesome.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:43 AM
-5

You're witnessing a struggle between different factions of the ruling class. It's hilarious -- and a little bit touching -- that you think Peterson represents the plebs. You little sweetheart. One day you will learn the truth.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:41 AM
-6

You're witnessing a struggle between different factions of the ruling class. It's hilarious -- and a little bit touching -- that you think Peterson represents the plebs. You little sweetheart. One day you will learn the truth.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:40 AM
0

no one takes mens rightz sriouzy derp derp
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:33 AM
1

It has to do with your character.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:27 AM
1

Heh, that's fair. But what are you -- snow white?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:23 AM
1

I still don't get it. What, you think you're "innocent" or something?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:19 AM
1

It isn't.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:13 AM
1

Are you mentally retarded? I posted links to Morgan in Shawshank.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:10 AM
1

How stupid are you? Are you completely unaware that the mere allegation of sexual impropriety by a man has become at least as bad as anything doled out by the courts? Of course you're not. Good name in man and woman, dear my lord, Is the immediate jewel of their souls. Who steals my purse steals trash; 'tis something, nothing; 'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to thousands; But he that filches from me my good name Robs me of that which not enriches him, And makes me poor indeed.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:53 PM
1

what he committed is sexual harassment No. You don't know what he did or didn't do. Remember, sweetheart, that your feelings are not law. We still have due process rights, albeit declining, thanks to feminism. This would mean that you consider things like catcalling and hitting on women at work rape. Catcalling is an almost exclusively working class phenom. Do you wish to imprison working class men for being uppity? You obviously hate men WTF. This isn't cleverly ironic, it's just dumb.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:45 PM
-1

Peterson hasn't said a single word about the free speech attacks against the BDS movement. Chomsky traveled to France to defend a Holocaust denier. Chomsky has actual principles, Peterson is a charlatan. Edit: and the fact that this is being downvoted says everything you need to know about Peterson acolytes -- they are fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:40 PM
0

My impression of Chomsky is just another empty blowhard lol. You're cute. You remind me of a teddy bear, minus the ominous intelligence. Could you link me a video where his genius shines so I can judge him by the best of what he has to offer? Didn't I just do that? Here -- since everyone is so fond of "classical liberalism" nowadays: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq9irdLcZmU
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:33 PM
-1

Alternatively, you should stick to things you understand. Which would include eg felt markers.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:28 PM
1

Heh.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:26 PM
2

The fundamental problem with the new "feminist justice" is that it doesn't allow for innocence. Another problem is that it doesn't distinguish between a man being a cad and a bit naughty and a man brutally assaulting someone. For example a dude at PBS was FIRED and his life DESTROYED for the crime of...putting a hand on a woman's back. That's it. Have we all lost our fucking minds? Yet another problem is that MeToo amounts to Trial by gossip. We all know how reliable and truthful gossip is -- WT…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:03 PM
1

Good thing we no longer require courts. We can just declare him guilty, then move on.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:51 PM
1

ahem
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:41 PM
0

Noam makes Peterson look like a kid who dropped their ice cream. But I still like Peterson -- in fact I like Peterson in part due to his overall ineptness.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:42 PM
0

I don't have a son, and I'm not a feminist. No you're a feminist. I can tell.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:39 PM
1

So you think he's guilty, then.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:37 PM
2

Hey, I like Peterson. WTF?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:35 PM
2

Yeah I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:31 PM
-8

Agreed. But we shouldn't' pretend he's Noam Chomsky. Edit: people are really breaking my balls over this post. So here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq9irdLcZmU There. "Classical liberalism" in all its glory.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:24 PM
5

James Caan is a good fella. That is enough. We'll see more and more good fellas from ages past speaking up saying, WTF, Feminazis.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:21 PM
5

Holy shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:19 PM
1

Also you people who automatically claim the girls are lying are no better than those who automatically claim he is guilty. Look, kid, no one actually thinks that, whereas we have many, many examples of men being falsely accused. So you can take your feminist concern trolling and shove it...right up your ass.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:12 PM
1

Do we?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:08 PM
2

the difference is that it's all in good fun when women do it; if a man does it it apparently justifies destroying him. You know that, and I know that.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:50 PM
3

They can't in this day and age You're much more honest than most feminists. I don't feel the need to continue. Remember that you have a son though, and that feminists hate him. <various un-pc things that Morgan Freeman did Indeed.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:42 PM
10

"sexual misconduct." Can you define that for me? And also, can you explain how a man can defend himself against such accusations? Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:26 PM
3

I peg him as a guy who would say Well that may be a problem.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:06 PM
5

Here is an excellent video about Morgan Freeman defending his innocence. Granted it's from the fan favorite The Shawshank Redemption, but personally I think Red is right: carceral feminists need to fuck off. Edit: is hope a good thing?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:09 PM
1

Until there is a conviction? I think you meant to say if there is a "conviction."
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:00 PM
2

Don't forget the privilege of various lung diseases.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:42 PM
1

blatantly lying Yes, you are. Now smarten up.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:21 AM
385

Why do women make false rape accusations? Well to avoid paying $13 in cab fare, for one Here's a shocking idea: women are not angels but human beings, and as such are just as capable as men as doing bad things. Though granted they may attack people in different ways, like eg rather than using direct violence they may use proxy violence and make a false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:20 AM
4

Interestingly I think his biggest slam dunks are when he uses common MRA arguments. For example in discussing "historical female oppression" he brings up conscription, and also notes that reliable birth control wasn't invented until fairly recently. Or when she brings up the wage gap he discusses workplace fatalities (she rapidly changes the subject when he does so). I disagree with one of the arguments made by Peterson -- that the much higher male suicide rate is caused by men using more direct…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:53 PM
29

EVEN as rich countries seek to rid workplaces of subtle gender bias EVEN as rich countries seek to rid workplaces of subtle gender bias discriminate against men in the workplace The aim is often to protect the “weaker sex”. Some laws put women in the same category as children; So exactly like feminists, then, when it comes to eg prison sentencing. they concern jobs seen as physically tough, such as mining, construction and manufacturing. "Seen as" lol. If they allowed women to perform these jobs…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:40 PM
9

A few more words on Orwell's anti-feminist views. Orwell was both a "radical leftist" (he supported democratic socialism and had some sympathies toward anarchism) and a social conservative. Though this may seem bizarre to modern ears, it was in fact the norm among leftists until the late 1960s. Some of Orwell's views are unsavory in retrospect. For example he was hostile toward gays, and during WWII he advocated for restrictions on abortion rights. It has been argued that his main concern vis a …
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:02 PM
1

I don't watch the ABC but if it's anything like the CBC it's not "left wing." Rather it's pro establishment, which means being pro feminist/SJW. By way of illustration, the CBC hasn't (to my knowledge) showcased a single person who opposes Western invention in Syria, but that's the most common position on the left. "Liberal" is probably an accurate characterization. Pro war, pro corporate capitalist, pro police state, pro feminist, pro SJW.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:46 PM
74

The two are one and the same. A good example of "toxic masculinity" is the male feminist who spends his life white knighting for women, riding upon his imaginary white steeds to rescue the damsel in distress from rape culture, the earnings gap and indeed toxic masculinity itself. Exhibit A: R/MensLib A good example of Toxic Femininity is the woman who can't go a week without playing "damsel in distress", manipulating men emotionally and refusing to take responsibility for her actions. Exhibit B:…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 06:20 PM
7

Yep. These adds are actually extremely insulting to women as well as men. They are essentially a role reversal in which the male is weak and incompetent and the female is strong and competent; the only way this actually works as satire is if we believe the opposite to be true. They also assume that: (a) women are insecure. They need to be portrayed as flawless superheroes rather than human beings. (b) women are sadists. It makes them feel good to see men degraded and harmed. These adds are not f…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:00 PM
17

Depending on the size of the rocks that boy could have been seriously injured (though even pebbles can cause blindness). I'm not gonna watch the video, I can't stomach child abuse. No arrest eh? Why not just make it official and pass a law saying women can do whatever the fuck they want free of consequences? That seems to be where we're headed. I may have to take a break from this sub, it's giving me high blood pressure.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:13 AM
16

It makes no sense. Feminism is without question the most hypocritical ideology in history.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:23 AM
26

You underestimate the amount of money people are willing to give feminists. They've already raised 50 grand and counting. Hell the feminist movement itself wouldn't even exist in any significant capacity if it weren't for billionaires throwing money at them.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:06 AM
15

I see no reason why this woman shouldn't have her life ruined. It doesn't matter if she was drunk too, she engaged in a sexual act with a man who was drunk. Therefore she is a rapist. Now granted, this makes no logical sense whatsoever, but what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Edit: According to the lawsuit, the treatment and discipline imposed on the woman amounted to “slut-shaming.” Heh. Still using the feminist buzzwords even after being hoisted on the feminist petard. They just …
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:49 PM
3

No, no worries.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:42 PM
10

It's not "female only." The people who maintain the infrastructure on the island, import the food etc. will be 99 percent men. Somewhere along the production line, male workers will die on the job servicing these oppressed womyn. I would be legitimately impressed if the feminists who came up with this scheme insisted on all-female electricians, plumbers etc. But that would require not being raging hypocrites.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:26 PM
3

They gave them to the tribes women. Link? That sends chills down my spine.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:20 PM
8

Female power is derived to a significant extent from the illusion of weakness. A woman's tears are powerful weapons. It makes sense, therefore, that in a gynocentric environment people will compete over who is the biggest victim, rather than eg who is the most competent. Add the fact that many of these people were coddled by single mothers and had no male influences growing up. This discourages autonomy, resilience, empathy (surprisingly enough, but confirmed by Warren Farrel's research), and ho…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:17 PM
17

"Death threats and rape threats." "Torrent of abuse." "I was happy with the interview." Ho hum. She would be much better off if she simply said, "yeah, it wasn't my best work, and I've learned from it." That might even endear her to the internet crowd. The problem is that feminists are simply incapable of taking responsibility for anything, not even a bad work day. They always have to deflect by demonizing men and portraying themselves as poor wittle victims.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:02 PM
20

said her boyfriend had pressured her to falsely accuse Perry and Counts r/thathappened. Do you know of any men who would encourage a woman to falsely accuse another man of rape? Pathetic that even now she is refusing to take responsibility and instead blaming another man.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:03 PM
27

Rob was the only male counsellor working at the Perth office. Since his forced resignation there are only female counsellors, an extraordinary situation for an organisation claiming to offer couple counselling. Good lord. Talk about a hostile work environment: the only male amidst a bunch of radical man-hating feminists. Cases like these are about more than just one man being fired -- as awful and unjust as that is. They have a chilling effect on the rest of society. Speak out against feminism a…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:12 AM
19

This is utterly retarded. I've had people open doors for me and -- like all non insane people/feminists -- I appreciated the gesture. Modern women are so spoiled and privileged that feminists have been reduced to whining about their privileges. Think about that. I guess this is what happens when you spoil a child rotten. They don't develop into content, well-adjusted adults; they become narcissistic, bitter and perpetually angry. What a mess.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter