TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

antsypantsy995 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by antsypantsy995 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

They are not necessarily chasing the top 5% of men perse, but rather women are far less likely to "settle" or "compromise" on their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:36 AM
21

Easy answer: the powerful set it up. Men did not set up the system. The powerful set up the system. Yes, majority of the powerful were men, but the system was not set up to oppress women, it was set up to oppress. That's it. It was set up to oppress everyone to keep those who had power in power. People always use "women's suffrage" as "evidence" of the patriarchy. But it's good to point out to them that men didnt get the right to vote until about only 10-20 years before women did in most Western…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 12:07 AM
5

Your Honour, I produce the following evidence to the court: Form #1 which was signed by both parties agreeing to commence kissing Form #2 which was signed by both parties agreeing to continue kissing Form #3 which was signed by both parties agreeing to remove clothing of Partner #1 Form #4 which was signed by both parties agreeing to remove clothing of Partner #2 Form #5 which was signed by both parties agreeing to allow Partner #2 to place the erect penis of Partner #1 into her mouth Form #6 wh…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 04:16 AM
5

Male sexuality isnt degenerate please stop equivocating it. Men and women have different sexual desires. Neither are inherently wrong or degenerate. It's how one acts upon such desires. Men liking women with perky boobs and liking women with hourglass shapes is no more degenerate than women liking men with 6 figure salaries and liking men >6ft. Men paying for prostitutes in order to satisfy their desire for perky boobs and hourglass hips is what is arguably degenerate. But if that's the case the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:29 AM
2

I mean, it's the same with women. Women proudly say they only care if a guy is really nice, agreeable, funny, caring, kind, demure etc. They dont care is he doesnt have a six pack, or doesnt have a six figure salary, or is shorter than 6ft. And then go on to only date someone who has a six pack, earns 6 figures, and is taller than 6ft then is FURIOUS they all have a shitty personality....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:26 AM
3

And feminists have achieved formal equality (at least in the West) for women. Women and feminist zealots dont seem capable of accepting this fact and are now pushing for substantial equality or equity which is completely incongruent with the fundamentals of Western liberal and free societies. Manosphere has come about because of the zealotry to achieve equity, not equality. Manosphere has come about because in their zealotry, women and feminists have put lipstick on a pig branding their push for…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:21 AM
3

Leftists and women fail to realise that the manosphere itself has come about precisely because of the permeation of feminist zealotry within society and politics. The biggest most glaring problem is that leftists and women fail to recognise this and in response to the growth of the manosphere, they double down on their zealotry instead of actually listening to what the manosphere has to say which does nothing but further drive more men towards the manosphere. And the more the zealotry is doubled…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 11:45 PM
5

Perhaps a better wasy to rephrase it would be: Permitting a man to put his unprotected penis inside of you is a concious decision. Women should be held accountable for this decision to do so. Women are fully within their rights to refuse entry into their vagina to any penis - protected or unprotected - so the fact that a penis goes inside you unprotected necessarily means that the woman made a concious choice to allow entry. (Obviously rape is completely separate discussion).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 03:30 AM
3

It actually is a serious systemic issue that no-one is talking about and may soon well grow to start also affecting women too. Our society and economy and therefore jobs, are becoming more and more cerebral and complex over time. More and more jobs now require some sort of tertiary or even HS education and requires an ability to handle and solve more and more complex issues and tasks. This means that the required average IQ to effectively perform jobs is starting to go higher and higher. IQ is b…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 02:47 AM
10

If you think that's bad check out this garbage from my home country Australia here. Long story short: BF and GF both 15yo send each other nudes. Boy gets prosecuted and found guilty of "procuring a child to do indecent acts" which is a sex offence. Boy now has permanent criminal record and must register on sex offender list, and must visit police on a regular basis. Nothing about the girl getting prosecuted and charged, despite them both sending each other nudes and both being underage.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:50 AM
7

If the women are going to act like this, the safest bet is literally to check out from women - dont give them anything they ask for, you'll get close to nothing in return and if you do get something, it'll come with 10000 T&Cs and breaking any one of them will see you ruined either reputationally, financially, and/or legally. I know a few guys who have clued on to this now and they're considering checking out of dating and relationships with women, focussing on themselves, and then hiring a pros…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:12 AM
1

Doing so would likely just increase the risk of more incels in society...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:53 PM
3

If the only thing the left can take away from this L for them is more gender and woke politics, then they've learnt absolutely nothing from this election.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:46 AM
8

Now, some experts are claiming the problem is being fueled by men who are unable to commit to traditional family life. What kind of garbage is this? These folks are literally calling men incapable of commitment - how can society let such misandry and insult run rampant? The issue isn't men's capability to commit - we see millions of devoted and loving and caring fathers everywhere every day. The issue is that more and more men are unwilling to commit. And it's not hard to see why: everything is …
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:58 PM
16

Yea the courts are cooked as well what with the whole MONA dogshittery - basically the judges are now on the side of "eff what the law actually says, I'll just declare that women get whatever they want even if it's against the law". So even if there's a good samaritan law on the books, the courts will still rule against the man trying who was trying to save the woman. Safest bet is to literally just not approach the woman at all, regardless of whether she needs help.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:42 AM
32

Yea our country is cooked now. I've also heard that a lot of men are refusing to give CPR or mouth to mouth resucitation to say a random woman dying on the street because of fear of being accused of sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:19 AM
44

But she violated the law if she sent and received images....
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:01 AM
79

What conviction did the girl get? After all, according to the story, the guy exchanged intimate images with a classmate In other words, they both sent images to each other so both would have violated the law.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:59 AM
9

Australia. And before this, it wasnt legal to exclude one sex or gender from something. But now we have this case, it's set the precedent that so long as you can demonstrate that your particular group of people are disadvantaged in any way, your discrimination can now be considered acceptable! Therefore, I can demonstrate that because men commit more suicides, they are disadvantaged so now Im banning women from my cake shop to help alleviate male disadvantage and it's perfectly legal cos this ju…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:55 AM
1

Ironically, I dont think either the lower or supreme court ever dealt with the issue of forcing men to pay the same price - the whole saga's just been about whether or not you can exclude men from entering. Guy still has a chance to get it shut down in the renewed lower court hearing by pushing this point again.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:53 AM
3

Isnt that statement mysoginistic in and of itself? It's mysognistic now to believe men and women are equal (yet different).
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:51 AM
3

Read the judgement here and the mental gymnastics this single judge goes to make this ruling "logical" is ridiculous. In short, the judge basically says: (a) There was a Status of Women 2024 Report Card submitted by the museum in the original hearing (b) The Report Card "indisputedly" demonstrates women are marginalised (c) Women are marginalised - as demonstrated by the Report Card, therefore it is beyond argument that the exclusionary artwork unequivocally "promotes equal opportunity" (d) The …
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:46 AM
-2

Effect of painkillers is correleated with attributes like physical size. The bigger you are, the more painkillers you need to actually lessen the effect. Women in general are smaller than men so it is 100% reasonable for the initial dosage of painkillers to be less than that given to a man. Anaesthesia is exactly the same too: you need more drugs to sedate a 6ft5 100kg male body builder compared to a 5ft4 50kg female. But of course none of that is important and the only thing that shows is that …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 05:14 AM
1

"Your Honour we're allowed to discriminate against men because it's just a meme." "Your Honour we're trying to provide a service to a historically excluded and underserved section of society because women weren't allowed in bars." "Your Honour, being excluded IS the artwork." "Your Honour, it's not even an art museum, it's just a toilet. Are you saying men should be allowed in women's toilets?" <---------- YOU ARE HERE
/r/MensRights09/05/24 01:54 AM
10

I think that's what the plaintiff's whole argument is about: he paid $35 - the same as any other visitor and was subsequently told he would be barred entry into an exhibit on the basis of the gender. From what I could see from MONA's T&Cs there is no "buyer beware" warning prior to buying tickets, thus the plaintiff's case has merits of violating Tasmania's Anti-Discrimination Act Section 22(c) which basically says that unless exempted, it is illegal to disciminate based on gender in the provisi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/24 12:35 AM

This is also why the likes of Andrew Tate is so popular especially among young men. Society sees young men flocking to Tate and hear what Tate is saying and just assume that that's why young men flock to Tate and therefore Tate must be banned. But it's not getting to the root of the problem as to why young men are drawn to Tate. It's not because of Tate's views perse, it's because Tate accurately diagnoses what is wrong with society particularly towards men and young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:42 PM
2

The most tragic part of this is how quickly he felt compelled to apologise for his comments. He mentioned the importance of contextual surroundings for comments, but rather than sticking to his views and explaining his words, he gives the crazy feministic mob exactly what they want: a good-looking, talented, intelligent, kind, and assertive man humiliated and ashamed for his views. Henry’s apology
/r/TheRedPill24/07/18 07:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter