TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aoeusnth0 Archive

View 6 posts and 277 comments by aoeusnth0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

pretend every failure is not Socialism and every success is Socialism Said or implied nowhere by me. I'm, in fact, countering your point that it's essentially an impossibility that it's not a dead-end. Cause that's a huge logical fallacy, especially considering counter evidence to that idea. I have no dog in this fight, and I'm pretending about absolutely nothing. Capitalism operates on the whole idea of businesses failing and succeeding because only the successful idea should work. And other wa…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 11:19 PM
1

You're the one that indicated his business was socialist, when it really even isn't. And note this discussion is about socialist businesses, which you started, not communism or socialism in general, or as practiced by dictators. Enormous dissertations aren't even enough to cover it all. people pick and choose what Socialism is so they can say the ideology isn't bullshit because one particular item that really isn't Socialism is happening to be working. And you're picking and choosing which porti…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:18 PM
1

But those pieces did overlook the fact that Price’s experiment wasn’t really a failure. In fact, Gravity Payments was, and still is, chugging along. Even though the company did lose a handful of clients, it actually signed on even more — so many more that it had to go on a hiring spree. And given that Gravity Payments is fighting in a labor pool for talent with the likes of Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and others — all with offices within a short drive of Gravity’s — Price likely would h…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 05:09 PM
2

No, not exactly at all. His company is doing fine. His mortgages were a political statement just as much as additional income for "his political statement/experiment" However, as GeekWire reported in December, no mortgages have been recorded on the properties. In a subsequent court filing, Dan Price acknowledged that his homes haven’t been mortgaged, saying that he “attempted to mortgage my home and rental property, but so far these loans have been denied based on the ongoing lawsuit.” http://ww…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:44 PM
2

If you want to talk about socialist businesses, then let's talk about Mondragon as well, k?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:26 PM
4

Here's another good one by the same author. http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2013/04/yes-all-feminists-are-like-that.html Including the discussion in the comments with a feminist
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:07 PM
2

The survey found only 40 percent agreed they should be in the national pool for potential troops And for comparison, what percentage agree that men should be?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:05 PM
0

I'm curious how the female passengers feel about this.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:01 PM
1

There's a documentary on this. He shows some studies in there. https://youtu.be/E577jhf25t4
/r/MensRights05/06/16 09:58 PM
2

It's cute. But the extreme views don't really do much good, nor do they paint an accurate picture necessarily.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:32 AM
2

American, biased scientists and fanatic doctors with an agenda, yes. Definitely not European ones though.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:30 PM
3

Well, fair enough that many circumcised men feel and function well. But then you can use that same argument in support of FGM since plenty of circumcised women feel and function fine too. So... And since you asked A foreskin dildo is harder to make anyway, so silly argument.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:16 PM
0

This guy, with his questions again. Stop asking difficult questions! /s
/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:00 PM
1

He's stating that women with higher education choose to have smaller families. Correct. Is that supposed to be bad? Why do you think men advantage from women having their own income? I'm not saying it advantages men over women. But it certainly removes the disadvantage of having to support a woman. It is not about equal opportunities, it is overcompensating for real and claimed disadvantages in the past. Sure, there is a problem here. But this thread is about STEM. Whereas you're talking about g…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:58 AM
1

You're just talking nonsense. Besides, how is keep birth rates in check and having women make their own money a detriment to men? That's an advantage to men.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 01:29 AM
2

Good point. It's lose-lose-lose. There is no upside to this for him.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:39 PM
4

breast cancer research Oh yeah, and there's this one https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jccen/breast_cancer_man_denied_coverage_because_hes_not/
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:18 PM
5

I'm totally holding my breath for an article called Why Our Daughters Need MRA
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:36 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3w3o0s/better_outcomes_for_all_when_mutually_violent/ Also https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3y0s40/im_finally_off_probation_thanks_rmensrights_for/cy9rp8z Check this out. This is the program they are talking about. Sounds like a wonderful, fact-based program.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:29 AM
2

There is no doubt whatsoever. In addition to inherent gynocentrism, many good men are also afraid of being seen as sexist and looked down upon, albeit incorrectly. Women don't have such a thing to fear. It is encouraged!
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:46 PM
2

Good parents also don't have children with men that didn't want the child in the first place.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:36 PM
1

Also, I think there is legitimate fear it will put burden on the government to pay out more welfare. The counterargument is there will be less incentive for unwanted children if there won't be a big child support check waiting from a father.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:34 PM
2

Worst logic ever. Just because, on average, males may be less traumatized, it is now okay to tell actual victims to fuck off. He needs to be given a high five and a pat on the back for being a man. Oh, this video exists for no valid reason at all. Might want to watch it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikd0ZYQoDko
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:27 PM
1

I'm no expert, nor do I will pretend I am, but all I have to do is look at a Wikipedia or other information page on normalization to see that it is standard practice to make data usable, i.e. the opposite of lying. not normalizing would be lying in many cases. And that is also a term with many meanings. You are just talking absolute nonsense. The blog's most points are strawmans anyway, and normalization doesn't appear to even be a mainstay of the anti-gap argument. What is used, however, is con…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:04 PM
2

There was absolutely nothing incorrect in what I said. The use of precise language in science and statistics is of utmost importance. The meaning in the blog is clear, but I was referring to the common use of imprecise language by people such as the MRAs in here, as well as Feminists and the US president. The public has been fooled and I am decrying this. I will also decry the lying with statistics and omission. The blog's premise that women are inherently disadvantaged or discriminated against,…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 04:49 PM
3

Moreover, the news story said the "boy had an affair" with the teacher, not the reverse. It's probably nitpicking, but interesting wording.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:31 PM
2

There either is or isn't a pay gap. No, it's both. Because that depends on what gap you're calculating. When it comes to this issue, using imprecise language is being dishonest either way.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:20 PM
15

I remember reading that part of the reason why it was denied funding was because he wanted to house domestic abusers and those who faced domestic violence abuse all in the same shelter. This is a hilarious statement coming from them, considering abuse shelters house far more abusive women than any kind of men. Where's their concern about that?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:36 PM
4

You've got it backwards, dude. The honeymoon period is exactly why basing relationships on immediate attraction is flawed and why divorce rates are high. The attraction 'lust' fades. Arranged marriages have more love: https://archive.is/4FgcC
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:37 PM
2

Money is absolutely involved. Do your research. If the situation is neutral, money will definitely swing it in a certain direction. Of course the situation isn't even neutral, so it's all the worse.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:34 PM
2

but a waver shouldn't be able to instantly free a person from the outcome. Consider that, for many people, the act of ending a pregnancy goes against every moral and value they have. Why is it they we to suffer because of the choices and values of anti-abortion people? I call bullshit. If you want to talk about personal responsibility, then apply it equally. A woman wants to continue a pregnancy despite a lack of father and child support? Her choice, her responsibility. Father consents, or not, …
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:20 PM
6

Not having an abortion is utmost irresponsible if the child is unwanted.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:01 PM
2

This is so logical. I really like this one. It enforces proper responsibility for both parties.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 09:58 PM
1

That's no trap if they don't reply to you!
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:50 PM
4

Eh, that's not the way to go. What really needs to be asked is for them to explain how they're going to go about doing it. How are they going to force women to work more and choose careers they don't want? I want to hear their wonderful plan. :-) They need to be gradually cornered into giving answers that can be refuted by evidence.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:02 AM
3

You weren't either though. Gonna have to elaborate.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:33 PM
5

Convince me this is not trolling.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:22 PM
1

These are pretty good https://www.reddit.com/r/menkampf/ https://www.reddit.com/r/StormfrontorSJW/
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:17 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E577jhf25t4 This is a nice one. The best study shown there is that the more equal a society is, the less women go into engineering.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:13 PM
7

But is it?
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:36 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ex4k5/editing_wikipedia/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2s17pq/i_am_a_wikipedia_editor_with_around_2000_edits/
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:46 AM
3

Well, inversely, of course. Like when the many historic US anti-poverty and social programs relieved the nation of dire poverty. Hence why every advanced country has such programs and social support. Obviously. Let's not get started on all the other facts. Way too scary.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:02 PM
4

Facts are scary.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 09:17 PM
8

It's both. Is 18 years of forced child support and slavery no cause for emotional fallout for a man?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:55 PM
22

A huge portion of us are left-wing
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:41 PM
13

It's actually pretty irrelevant whether men are conditioned or not to be initiators. If they don't initiate, they get next to nothing. They have no choice. Women have the choice. So yes, it is wrong to pressure men to pay the whole amount.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:12 AM
6

Indeed. I'd rather have been actually raped than have a false case against me, let alone an actual conviction.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:09 AM
1

Also, more men go into the trades, bypassing college. Ain't no women wanting those jobs. HOWEVER, at the same time, some quality general education is important too. Too bad the quality has dropped. Schools need fixing for sure.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:13 AM
1

Oh, I know. But we can't be silent. As she had mentioned in there, they might not win the national election, but they have influence on local elections.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:54 PM
1

http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/#3775120b3095 84% of working women told ForbesWoman and TheBump that staying home to raise children is a financial luxury they aspire to. http://www.gallup.com/poll/186050/children-key-factor-women-desire-work-outside-home.aspx More than half of women, 56%, who have a child younger than 18 would ideally like to stay home and care for their house and family,
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:01 PM
1

Proposition: "a statement or assertion that expresses a judgment or opinion." So yes. Really? Well then. Here's my answer: I'm confident because ... well, let's say because I have great coffee :D There. Now since my confidence is a feeling, and you have no way to disprove any claim I make about it, we're done. K, that answers my question then.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:49 PM
1

Yes because you would be agreeing with the initial idea - and not taking a contrary position like I was. No, you don't get a free pass when you take a position. All your bullshit isn't going to change this rule of burden of proof in debates.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 07:07 PM
1

You're comparing apples with oranges. The statement "there's evidence" is an initial claim. I didn't make such a claim. What I did was dismiss a claim for basic income. You can't equate the two and cry tu quoque. The initial claim was yours: "It's a retarded idea." I was responding to your claim. It's that simple. If I said "It's a great idea" instead of your own statement, the burden would lie on me. This is what you don't get. You pointed to evidence without actually showing it to me. You said…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:24 AM
1

Your answer to my "genitals and breasts are not equivalent" is "buttocks are sexual though!" I never said breasts weren't sexualized in many of our countries. In addition, women's buttocks are more sexualized than men's, and yet we cover men's more. So much for your logic! I said they're not equivalent to genitals. And they're not. On top of that, they're far less sexualized in topless cultures. The more equality there is in society on toplessness, the less sexualized they are. That's further pr…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:52 PM
1

Exactly my thoughts: You're projecting. My refusal to do your work for you to seek out evidence is not an indicator of what proof I have or do not have. We have two claims going on. the initial claim of basic income UBI is ongoing research. If you want to make a claim against it, it's your own claim. So, there is really 1 claim here, and it's yours. My response to your claim isn't a claim other than asking to back up your position since you feel so strongly and certain about it. The general cons…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 08:46 PM
1

Nope. The initial proposition for UBI outside of this thread has been backed up plenty by studies, hence the increasing world trend towards UBI. Their UBI proposition has been backed up many times over. There is no problem with burden of proof here. It has been provided. And it has ZERO to do with me and my own burden of proof. I made no concrete claim either, other than pointing out that plenty of evidence exists, so I'd like to see your own evidence for your claim. Your claim is first in this …
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:50 PM
1

You: It's a retarded idea Me: "And you know all this how? As opposed to the evidence so far backing up UBI?" Here I am implying I want evidence for YOUR claim that it's a bad idea. You: Show me evidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof "When two parties are in a discussion and one asserts a claim that the other disputes, the one who asserts has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim." Your assertion: "It's a retarded idea." Still waiting for your eviden…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:25 PM
1

That's what I just said. So where's your proof backing up your proposition?
/r/MensRights09/05/16 07:05 PM
2

Not sub, but might help: http://www.drglover.com/no-more-mr-nice-guy/the-book.html https://7chan.org/lit/src/Robert_Glover_-_No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy.pdf
/r/MensRights09/05/16 05:15 PM
1

That is just outrageous.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 05:08 PM
1

That really depends on her definition of date rape and what exactly she's talking about. I'm sure she wrote more on this somewhere else, so it would have to be clarified. But in my opinion, if a person is not being physically forced to be unable to leave, it's not date rape. So if that's what she's getting at, I'm totally with her. One more thing: Right before this segment that I didn't include is a statement from her and agreement from Bill Maher: "I believe rape isn't actually a violence act, …
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:41 PM
2

Well, I guess we have the feminists to thank.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:24 PM
1

If you're not going to point it out, you're the one moving the discussion off-topic. Great strategy!
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:21 PM
1

Oh, no, that's not what I mean. I'm certainly a disaffected lefty myself, so I agree with you. It's just there is no big liberal MRA group. I'm saying if it got big enough, it would be useful.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:20 PM
1

You're the one making the claim that it's unworkable, contrary to most studies found with 2 clicks. Where's your own evidence backing up your claim?
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:16 PM
1

Well, that escalated quickly.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 05:25 AM
0

Absolutely it is. "Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, forcible sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling, and attempted rape." I personally don't think fondling should be in the same category as the rest, but that's the criteria that's used.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:27 AM
2

Spoken like someone who has never "checked a breast." Spoken like a well-conditioned member of modern society. My point never was that breasts are not sexually attractive. I'm talking about relative attractiveness between cultures, which is extremely important in making my case. Again, the key word here is OFTEN, which AGAIN makes that a learned behavior, not a hardwired one. Being attracted to feminine or masculine traits is absolutely hardwired. Much has been written on this in science. Hip ra…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:13 AM
1

No, what I'm presenting is the pre-eminent scientific theory. If you show me where it is a near-universally accepted scientific theory, I'll concede. Which is NOT the same thing as a sexual organ. Last time I checked breasts aren't a sexual organ. Yes, the key word their is SOME. Those are learned behaviors & are not the same thing as a hardwired attraction, which is what we have for the female breast. Sexual dimorphism and selection is not learned behavior. It's very much hardwired, albeit not …
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:20 AM
0

You know, it's not exactly an obscure topic that you can't Google.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:48 PM
1

great rebuttal
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:44 PM
12

As the other person said, the most important is your own female voice. Quite related, there is a book that can help a lot of men: http://www.drglover.com/no-more-mr-nice-guy/the-book.html https://7chan.org/lit/src/Robert_Glover_-_No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy.pdf A lot of feminist men probably suffer from that syndrome.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:20 PM
4

Honey Badger Brigade aren't our allies? Bullshit!
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:15 PM
1

She's a Milo counterpart in quite a few ways.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:05 PM
1

No, I'm adding useful information. That kinda goes along the path why covered butthole is necessary on the beach, but exposed buttocks are fine. So are you implying then we should make stricter rules about the covering of women's buttocks on the beach again since they can be viewed in a sexual way, just like many parts of the human body are? Since you're all for drawing analogies, be consistent!
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:03 PM
2

I guess my point is that there is a blip of oppression in that particular category, however small, because there is a concrete inequality in law in many places still. Call it whatever you want I guess. Call it sexism. And the roots are from Islam and Christianity, which are actually patriarchal. In general, do I think women here are oppressed relative to men? Of course not!
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:13 PM
1

I've heard feminism being referred to as neo-traditionalism. Because it still heavily relies on gynocentrism under a guise of equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:06 PM
1

I disagree and agree. I disagree the way this current sub is a problem. It feels about 50/50 in here so I see no problem. What I agree on is that, hypothetically, something good might come out of a more liberal-leaning MRA movement, whatever that actually means. The current liberals are not going to listen to conservatives, but they might actually sit down with other liberals. There is less ammo to shoot against liberal MRAs.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:00 PM
2

Well, in what cultures is showing a women's legs considered taboo? I'm pretty sure it's mainly in Burqa societies. I'm using comparison in the analytical sense. Sounds like you are confusing analysis with ethical judgement.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:52 PM
1

I'm comparing cultures to illustrate how societal norms, taboos, and Pavlovian conditioning work, especially in how they help create the double standard of the nipple.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:30 PM
8

That's not just SJWs. That's the majority of the damn country that buys into this.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:22 PM
3

What you are presenting here is a hypothesis. Also men have evolved deep voices, beards, and more muscle. They are ALSO considered sexual secondary characteristics. And many women are turned on by these things to various extents in choosing her mate. We are more turned on by breasts because they are "taboo" and have been socialized to be viewed ONLY in a sexual context, unlike in many other topless cultures. It's so obvious.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:16 PM
0

K, let's play then. By your logic, since a horny woman touching a man's muscly chest or abs without his consent is also considered sexual assault, man's abs and chests are now sexual organs too. Right? And if I make comments about them, it's not sexual harassment. Right? Correct. It inherently isn't. Unless the comments are in sexual/inappropriate nature, or the woman decides it is sexual harassment. Not all women do. And if woman starts taking pictures of a man without his consent in order to u…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:06 PM
1

whose fault is it that caused him to behave that way? It's societal fault. Not the man's, nor the woman's.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:43 PM
1

You've never heard of them? They were commonplace. As far as I know, they did often cover their dicks. But not always. That of course depends on the culture. My main point is that it's cultural, not biological. http://saattvika.com/bali/1941.html Also are you actually comparing wearing Burqas to wearing bikinis? Are you for real? Have you not understood my point? Read it again.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:39 PM
1

Covering up genitals and ass can even be considered purely from a hygiene perspective.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:25 PM
0

Which actually shows the absurdity of the status quo. Supposedly it's breasts that need to be covered, but actually, it's the nipples that aren't really allowed, since a man-boob with nipple is fine, but a flat-chested woman's nipple is not fine. It all breaks down in logic. Because there is none. All you have to do is look at current primitive and past societies to see women walking around topless to realize it's far more social and cultural than biological basis. Christianity and Islam is what…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:52 AM
2

Just like covering up dicks oppresses men. Women actually do have genitals, you know? You must be mixing things up. Breasts aren't genitals.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:39 AM
0

And you know all this how? As opposed to the evidence so far backing up UBI?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:09 AM
5

No, that's not what it said. It said compared to Republican representatives , Democrat representatives have more masculine faces of men and women. What that actually means could be anyone's guess. Could even have something to do with intelligence, since Democrats are the more intellectual party.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:38 AM
4

Where are the feminists when we need them?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:35 PM
0

I applaud this. Enough of this "he or she" crap. I'll take they.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:39 PM
5

Free advertising for men's rights at least.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 09:29 PM
3

Yes, it's a shitty situation, but you're right. If I were you, I'd of course try to avoid the courts as much as possible, but you gotta do what you gotta do if he remains unreasonable.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:34 PM
2

I'm curious, is his GF getting child support?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:15 PM
1

/r/IAMA isn't for asking a question yourself. I think you meant /r/askreddit. Although good thing you came to this sub. MensRights is the best one to ask. To be honest, I'm surprised you didn't pick circumcision.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:23 PM
1

http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49601 Compared to Men, Women View Professional Advancement as Equally Attainable, but Less Desirable http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/#3775120b3095 84% of working women told ForbesWoman and TheBump that staying home to raise children is a financial luxury they aspire to. http://www.gallup.com/poll/186050/children-key-factor-women-desire-work-outside-home.aspx More than half …
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:47 PM
4

unpaid domestic tasks as men Bullshit. The higher-earning man is the one who pays. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49601 Compared to Men, Women View Professional Advancement as Equally Attainable, but Less Desirable http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/09/12/is-opting-out-the-new-american-dream-for-working-women/#3775120b3095 84% of working women told ForbesWoman and TheBump that staying home to raise children is a financial luxury they aspire to. http://www.gallup.com/…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:41 PM
1

It's pretty solid online dating advice these days: just meet somewhere that doesn't require a big time or money investment.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 01:10 AM
1

This one's easy -- don't do dinner dates.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 12:53 AM
14

Fucks given about her stupid PSA? Zero.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:35 PM
-1

It's not us in denial; it's the feminists in denial that false accusations are common.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:33 PM
1

I'm not talking just about arranged marriages.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:56 AM
1

I think another point I'm trying to make is that creating relationships based on compatibility of personality and interests rather than purely on random love is a good idea and pays off in the long term even when it's not quite evident in the short term.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:44 AM
1

Here's a good one that just came out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0dBfk0MXPM
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:12 PM
1

By kind, I basically mean empathetic. You pretty much have to be to be here supporting men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:40 PM
1

On a related note: http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/spring07/zuffoletti/love.html http://worldobserveronline.com/2013/02/15/why-arranged-marriage-is-likely-develop-lasting-love/ According to research, those in arranged marriages – or who have had their partner chosen for them by a parent or matchmaker – tend to feel more in love as time grows, whereas those in regular marriages feel less in love over time. I'm not traditional or TRP or anything, but I think people have been sold a bill of goods w…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:25 PM
2

Yeah, totally. You are a kind person of course. The issue is that the system is so draconian with no room for nuance. As George W Bush said, "I don't do nuance." That's at the heart of so many issues.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:02 PM
2

Look on the right side bar and most of your questions surely will be answered.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:55 PM
2

Well the other side is, is it fair for your husband to support a child that isn't his? Maybe he doesn't mind, but let's say he did not want to. And the kid may also have loyalty to the biological father. So some child support does seem warranted. Just not in the excessive amounts that happen in the US.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:41 PM
4

But that's the same as going into a mode of thinking that all men are rapists innately.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:28 PM
1

Oh, Americans are voting for her alright. Fucking idiots. To be fair, I think voting for Trump is no less idiotic. Fuck.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:24 PM
2

The source is the organization itself that did the report. If you read their methodology, they specifically mentioned not counting men's inequalities. You'll have to find and read the pdf they released. I don't remember where I saw it. Here is a video Christina Hoff Sommers did on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGI2YggNJCc In addition, women already rank equal or higher in general well-being in many countries. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ > click Gender Differences You should view a …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:18 AM
1

Are you reading my mind?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:17 AM
1

First sentence about benefits is strange though.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:44 AM
2

..which is the Wilks score which uses different coefficients for men and women. And?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:34 PM
2

Right from that thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/powerlifting/comments/2m7o2z/highest_wilks_in_ipf_history_6385_kg_world_record/cm2th81 Him: 123 pounds, total 1,620 pounds lifted. Her: 137 pounds, total 1,407 pounds lifted. That's a lot of body fat to make up. And MMA shows even a bigger difference. Women can't compete at all with men when in comes to more explosive moves.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:04 PM
2

Right. It's mostly biological. Even shorter men are weaker than taller men. I'd say there is a grain of truth though: men tend to do more physical labor and be more inclined to lift heavy in the gym, whereas women are disinclined, so that further reinforces the differences.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:55 PM
3

Not true.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:42 PM
-2

"de facto" is the #1 source
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:22 PM
1

maiming people and castrating ISIS male prisoners They're not. They're treat everybody humanely. What are you proposing, anyway, let ISIS take over? could instead protest I'm pretty sure they are, especially FGM. Besides, they're actually accomplishing: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/magazine/a-dream-of-utopia-in-hell.html?_r=0
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:14 PM
3

Kurdish PKK are hardcore feminists. https://youtu.be/BEXzLHeDcK8?t=1834 I don't agree with their radical philosophy, but the difference is that they truly have been disadvantaged, and to be fair the men as well, so they are fighting alongside men for their freedom. The Kurdish YPJ are less radical. I've heard one saying, paraphrasing: "Western feminists are putting women above men. We are not like that. We want truly equal treatment of men and women." And they are putting money where their mouth…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:49 PM
6

Unfortunately I bet that Laci is quite dense and the point people are trying to make will fly right over her head. She'll have a Sarkeesian moment: "I'm being harassed!"
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:22 PM
0

No need for the insults, bruh.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:56 PM
2

If a man wants a kid and a career, he can achieve that much more easily that a woman because society decided that a woman's place was in the home and wants to keep her there. I was replying to this. And thus I stand by my comment because nobody is forcing women into the home, which is a load of crap. Many women prefer it if they have the option. So you can't go on about the wage gap and then dismiss women's preferences. You can't have it both ways. And a fact for you: of stay-at-home parents, on…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 10:41 PM
2

You know why that's bullshit? Cause you're free to find a guy who wants to be a stay-at-home dad or works part time. Society doesn't force shit. How many women out there actually want to be a provider for a stay-at-home dad? Very few, that's what. That has far more to do with women's innate inclinations than society. Go in a field that likes to promote diversity, and you have an ADVANTAGE over men in that field. Easy done! Most people are in favor of paid maternal leave anyway.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:31 PM
2

And what about the man who's toiling away at work supporting everybody during that time? Where does that money go to? Not himself. It's like his contributions count for nothing.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:20 PM
1

Even more importantly and commonly: alcohol.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 09:05 PM
1

Sarcasm detected.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:28 PM
2

TLDR cause I ain't watching 20 minutes of this
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:11 PM
6

This is seriously my thought whenever I hear circumcision being proposed for phimosis. If I had it, I'd try everything first and certainly not consider circumcision unless it was health-threatening. It should be the last resort, and yet there are tons of people that propose it as a first resort. Like, what?!
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:16 PM
12

Their consistent argument is that we are using straw tumblr feminists. Which is itself a straw-man argument in essence since we are most concerned with the feminists that are with power and influential voices.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:25 PM
1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/teens-choosing-death-in-russia/2012/03/01/gIQADrhPwR_story.html According to another Wiki, alcohol abuse is one of the biggest causes. The question of course is whether alcoholism is the symptom of another issue, or a big cause itself. But the Soviet Union was pretty "feminist" actually. It was very egalitarian and women took more masculine duties and worked a lot. I don't know if feminism is linked at all either way though. It seems to be other causes…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:15 PM
2

Yeah, that'll really deter criminals, huh!
/r/MensRights21/04/16 09:55 PM
10

If he got an STD that might change his demeanor.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 09:49 PM
2

OP is a woman btw.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:32 PM
2

Unfortunately, by linking directly to this website, you're increasing their Google rankings. I'd delete this soon, or use www.archive.is
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:28 PM
9

The question is, how the fuck do we fix this problem if jurors are biased?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:14 PM
4

didn't work for me
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:44 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2xuna2/judge_judy_is_an_mra_great_quote_from_her_on_the/
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:42 PM
1

Yes. But most people, especially women, are also inherently gynocentric.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:14 AM
1

You condensed the solutions well. BUT, the other problem is bloated and corrupt child support in USA and probably other countries. There was some video here recently asking a Scandinavian country's child support official about their child support, and their child support is much fairer than the one in USA. So if we had a fair family court system, the problems would be much less.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:07 PM
9

The irony and insane reality is that in every situation and argument they present, if you reverse the genders, it makes even more sense. What the hell is wrong with these people that they don't realize this?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:30 PM
1

And imagine how much higher it would be if women weren't given preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:42 PM
2

Too bad his wife-beater analogy isn't a good one.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:32 PM
1

Indeed. It's like we are more feminist than feminists. Many feminists aren't real egalitarians.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:12 PM
3

Start recording or something
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:10 AM
10

How? We use facts; they use lies. We use logic; they use propaganda. We use unbiased academically sound studies; they use feminist works. We are egalitarian; they are not. We promote free speech; they oppose it. There is so little in common. Kind of important distinctions, don't ya think?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:51 AM
2

Yeah. I didn't mean to say that men are required for reproduction, just that the gynocentrism still exists.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:12 PM
3

Agreed. Back then, it wasn't an issue, because both were important. The disconnect today is that reproduction is no longer required of women. We're overpopulated, for fuck's sake. But the inherent value placed upon them is still there.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:38 PM
5

Not in absolutes, but relatively more so, yes. But then you can go down so many rabbit holes with that. Attractive are valued over ugly. Rich over poor. It's the luck of the draw.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:34 PM
7

Another great part is feminist theory. actual solutions.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:22 PM
1

SecularTalk and Rubin Report is where it's at. Fuck Pakman
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:10 PM
5

Ripping feminist propaganda with logic point by point. Good work.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 06:40 PM
1

Ah, Spain at it again.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:43 PM
13

There's some truths there and it's useful for helping some men snap out of being all "blue pill," but after some analysis, my conclusion is it's an echo-chamber of weird and unrealistic hypothesis and woman shit-talking. Gets old fast, seriously. On the basis of free speech, of course I have no problem.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:27 PM
1

You don't have to disagree. You get banned commenting there merely if you are associated with this sub.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:37 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOXh5repOWI This is the kind of shit you get promoting feminists into power. You want people like this running the country? I'm not saying the current corrupt fucks or conservatives are any better, but two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:34 PM
3

Having a surplus of quality candidates, I don't see why you wouldn't take the opportunity to have equal representation. I'd have no problem with that. I'm also sure he could have picked a perfectly qualified team This I doubt. Data and history on affirmative action has shown this to not be the case in many areas. And as I've tried to say before, feminism as a movement is not anti male. Feminism is pro equality, and comes from a place where approximately 40 years ago there were no female news anc…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:29 PM
15

A common tactic they use is categorizing different work/jobs under the same loose category of a certain field and calling it "same jobs."
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:11 PM
2

Well, Wikipedia is biased against men's rights, so there is something to it.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:08 PM
2

sigh
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:03 PM
4

Yes and no. He's promoting inequality of opportunity and gender discrimination. Gender shouldn't be a basis on hiring or promoting somebody. Merit should be. You'd think feminists would be against gender discrimination, right? RIGHT? On top of that, he's likely promoting women that are feminists that will further entrench Canada in unequal anti-male laws. In fact, speaking of Canada, right in the constitution it is discriminatory against males. What fucked up shit it is. And you wonder why we ar…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:50 PM
8

You must be new here or not paying attention. The reason we are anti-feminist is because feminists actively fight AGAINST equality. Whenever non-feminists try to promote equal laws, feminists swoop right in TO FIGHT AGAINST EQUALITY. Like, holy shit, is it THAT surprising we are anti-feminist? This pertains to countries all over the world: UK, US, Canada, Australia, India, Israel, etc. The same shit is happening constantly. MRAs/egalitarians are pro-equality. Powerful feminists and feminist lobb…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:23 PM
1

And let's be real, in addition to male and poor, if you add "black" to that combo, you have even a better recipe for injustice.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:28 PM
2

You could just call yourself humanist or egalitarian and nobody has a problem with those Well, except some idiot feminists, that is. MRAs certainly wouldn't have an issue with that. First and foremost, I consider myself egalitarian, not MRA.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:19 PM
1

Not in this case.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:03 PM
1

They did mention gay men briefly when it comes to prostate. Give em some credit eh!
/r/MensRights13/04/16 04:02 PM
5

"the privileged are blind to their own privilege" is another good one. Man, these feminists are great! Giving us so much free ammo!
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:50 PM
1

I'm gonna have to disagree. I'd rather err on the side of caution. Of course there is also breast-pumps so that solves the issue anyhow.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:48 PM
6

That's the nature of reddit, whaddya expect. On the topic of kids and activism, I'll throw this out there. https://www.ted.com/talks/melati_and_isabel_wijsen_our_campaign_to_ban_plastic_bags_in_bali?language=en It's pretty cool
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:27 PM
3

Correct. The issue isn't whether it's 15% or 50%, but discrimination. HOWEVER, under-reporting cannot be dismissed either. It's definitely an issue in society.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:24 PM
0

Oh, I'm with you. I just meant that there is Uber already, so in this case it's really not worth the bother. This company probably will go under anyway. No man(nor many women) want to use this stupid company anyway. That's why I'm not worried about it. It's not a great business idea.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:18 PM
5

While the phrasing "paygap is a myth" is a bit of a misnomer by itself, what it really means is "(the problem of the) paygap is a myth." You can find "gaps" between all kinds of people, including Asians and Whites. Doesn't mean it's discrimination, patriarchy, or even a problem in the first place. Because let's be real, feminism wants to eat its cake and have it too in many ways. http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/12/30/if-asians-make-more-than-whites-then-what-should-we-do-about-the-u…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:14 PM
2

How likely would the same have happened if the genders were reversed? Not likely. So yes, it IS a fault of the system. On top of that, when winning freedom depends on the amount of money you have, yes, it IS a fault of the system.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:56 AM
5

Hmm, this is kind of random. The main thing I don't like is saying there are equal numbers, which may not be true. Actually, maybe this isn't even misandry. Quite frankly, since this isn't a government-funded public transit, I don't give a fuck what they do. The only thing is, if there was a service only for men, people would probably lose their shit, and THAT is the problem I have with this.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:44 AM
4

Damn, I really I wonder why people might be inclined to say "I can't believe you get paid for this."
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:55 PM
2

Also, since women work less hours, it's only obvious that can bring down the average. It's not bad or good, just averages. But definitely, if there is an overabundance of workers, that always brings down wages, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:47 PM
2

This one here works! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvlmg-xV8_0
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:32 PM
1

Gynocentrism sells. It's really that simple, I think.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:01 AM
1

But is it? There is a ton of information written on this in general, but I am unaware if this is a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:49 AM
2

I agree 100%. This is only further fuel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:35 AM
1

No. If it continues to get worse, this will be further proof and fuel for the movement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:30 AM
18

It seems unclear at this point whether this was an automated system or Facebook staff decision. On the positive side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
/r/MensRights12/04/16 03:17 AM
1

Schmitt (2014) found most psychological sex differences are larger in more gender egalitarian cultures, and smaller in more patriarchal cultures, directly refuting the view psychological sex differences are learned because they emerge more strongly in patriarchal cultures that have more extreme sex-role socialization (see also Udry, 2000). Indeed, psychological sex differences seem to emerge most strongly in the most gender-egalitarian of cultures (e.g., Northern Europe), cultures that allow peo…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:43 PM
1

A nice suit would probably help as well
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:36 PM
-1

Oh, anti-male organizations with power are of no concern for you. My bad.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:58 AM
4

Yeah, REAL MULTI-SIDED. The lawyer they chose is herself a pro-female, anti-male and also heads such an organization. Also, the article chose an example of parental alienation male perpetrator. And they mention the group http://www.thewomenscoalitionpac.com Check out this yet ANOTHER blatantly pro-female, anti-male organization. COINCIDENCE?
/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:18 AM
4

Gynocentrist horseshit There is also concern within the medical community. “There is insufficient scientific evidence that parental alienation is a real mental disorder,” Stupid strawman comment. Whether it can be considered a real "mental disorder" has no bearing on the reality of it happening. Kids learn, from their parent, indoctrination can happen. No disorder required to have an ingrained belief.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:10 AM
5

correct http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896
/r/MensRights08/04/16 07:15 PM
2

That's a great question!
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:26 PM
1

Cause all women are the same. /s :-/
/r/MensRights07/04/16 11:21 PM
7

I have a suspicion some of those weren't really even MRA. If you could list them, then we could be more clear. But here's the thing, many of these are reactions to feminism and feminist hate. Is it really that surprising if feminists are instigating the hate?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:11 PM
1

illegitimacy of Marxism No.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:42 PM
2

But there's no need to create a false dichotomy. It doesn't have to be one or the other; it can be both. I particularly liked this quote from the article which illustrates one of the problems: "One of the worst-kept secrets about married couples is that they often treat their friends with more kindness, compassion and generosity than they ever do for each other. When best friends are together they are charming, engaging, helpful and courteous, but when they return home to their spouses they appe…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:03 PM
1

Yes. I am atheist, sorry.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:54 PM
4

Yup. The irony is that rationalwiki is quite SJW/feminist/anti-MRA slanted, but it's one of the most useful resources to refute feminist arguments. That's because rationalwiki is anti-religion, but since feminism is a religion, unbeknownst to them, it works just as well! As usual, feminist "logic" can often be used right back at them.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 02:25 PM
3

http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ Click Gender Differences
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:42 PM
3

http://bfy.tw/58aA
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:33 PM
3

"feminism spends a disproportionate amount of time on FGM while underfunding/ignoring MGM. Therefore feminism clearly does not act in a gender equal way. Technically, feminism shouldn't be concerned with men's issues since feminism is about women's issues. But realistically and ethically, it should be, because it has such a strong pull on society. So that's really the core problem with feminism. If you criticize feminism being too big of a monopoly, the response is: "don't worry, feminism about …
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:29 PM
4

Says the Bulletproofmonk. Check your bulletproof privilege!
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:24 AM
3

By their own logic then, most men don't report report rape to the police either. Which I imagine is quite true. Surely now they'll stop ignoring male victims right about now, right!?
/r/MensRights04/04/16 06:04 PM
1

Are you a robot?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:10 PM
1

Artificial artificial wombs. Heh.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:29 PM
1

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Despite the possibility of wasting resources, providing equal opportunity is the safe and inclusive option at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 10:20 PM
0

Troll or not, those women must have come from this place, eh http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:55 PM
2

Less media exposure perhaps
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:38 PM
1

We don't know how they interpret the answer.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:30 PM
5

We don't actually know if, given the same behavior and qualifications by female employees, would they achieve parity in the senior positions? We pretty much know. Women are more risk averse and also prefer flexible work. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49601
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:22 PM
3

"Teenage girls should always be protected." Is a very strange question indeed. If you say yes, you kinda sound like a super conservative, gynocentric, sexist, overprotective, controlling parent that may shoot her boyfriend for having sex. If you say no, you sound like a sociopath and sexist.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:57 PM
1

Sexism is demented shit that needs to be razed from the face of the earth.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:29 AM
9

As if Hillary will, lol. No vote for Bernie is a vote for Hillary. If you read the full quote, his main point wasn't about whites or poverty anyway. He ends with "We will end institutional racism and reform a broken criminal justice system." It's pretty damn clear he's talking about fixing the police & criminal justice system, which is certainly in the interest of men's rights. How could you be against that? Are the rest of the candidates interested in that? No, not really.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:16 AM
4

Is it not possible to report to police again?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:54 PM
4

I'm not completely clear, did you report this to police or not?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:39 PM
1

Cool website
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:49 PM
1

Try in private browsing mode.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:00 AM
-1

A majority of Americans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/182987/americans-continue-say-wealth-distribution-unfair.aspx http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/23/americans-support-wealth-redistribution_n_736132.html The respondents were presented with unlabeled pie charts representing the wealth distributions of the U.S., where the richest 20 percent controlled about 84 percent of wealth, and Sweden, where the top 20 percent only controlled 36 percent of wealth. Without knowing which country they were …
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:37 PM
3

I just checked. It's not a filter bubble. ^_^ I get the same stuff browsing anonymously. Also, suggestions for "feminism:" feminism is bullshit feminism lol feminism ted talk feminism ruined my generation feminism is cancer feminism vs facts feminism buzzfeed feminism is for nobody feminism debate WELL, that must be embarrassing for feminists.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:23 PM
4

There is no good reason to why she should be entitled to so much. I don't understand this absurdity. Why does he keep remarrying, anyway?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:04 PM
2

Precisely. It IS an excuse that is sometimes for women. Oh, the irony for the poster of that comment comes to bite them in the ass. I bet that's not what they were going for, huh.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:40 PM
1

Well, then there's nothing that can be done. Just like some rapists manage to go free, some liars will go free. Life's unfair, but it's the best compromise. But on the upside, there will be much stronger disincentive for liars, and no disincentive for non-liars. I'm just thankful we now have DNA and video evidence these days. Imagine the days when that didn't exist.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:31 PM
3

The argument that fear of retribution would frighten women off reporting actual assaults doesn’t bear any weight against men being unjustly dragged before the courts senselessly. Only if it is proven that she lied, should there be punishment. Innocent until guilty, as it should be. Problem solved. Like if there is video evidence, what possible excuse could there be to NOT punish the liar? Hell, it's the liars that are ruining it for real victims. Feminists should be championing the punishment of…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:15 PM
1

Why are liars given mostly a free pass? If there is conclusive evidence that they lied, they should receive similar punishment.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 04:58 PM
1

Because it's 2016.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:28 PM
0

This article is despicable, and I would certainly not support this organization.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:12 AM
10

Some good comments there. Like: "It shows the outrageous overcriminalization of men. There is not the slightest comparation between the damage caused from grope someone and the damage caused from the state punishing it. Which is the objective? Make men feel that the state is their enemy? Make men hate women?"
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:11 AM
0

And there's plenty of places where it's still illegal, and women are getting arrested. Even getting arrested in places where it's legal. What's not to buy?
/r/MensRights26/03/16 01:34 AM
2

Comparatively, no, they don't. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=49601
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:39 PM
0

topfreedom is one legit issue
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:28 PM
3

We very well know they'll likely go into white-knight mode for a female offender. There's plenty of apologia to be had from them. How ironic.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:20 PM
5

Well if your case is a lie, it's only logical. Police will actually have a bit of scrutiny. Can't have that.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:16 PM
1

What do you want to call it?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:57 AM
1

They'll happily ban women too.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:54 PM
1

Hmm, but what if one of their feminist posters goes in here to make an anti-MRA comment, then goes back to posting there? Would they get banned? I would assume they would if this was an automatic bot. That would actually be pretty funny if they were.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:46 PM
7

I was previously feminist-leaning myself.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:55 PM
2

Erm, or have a sibling that goes on reddit.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:09 PM
27

That mod's obviously fucked up in the head. Nothing new here. You know, I think they're deathly afraid of people finding out more about Men's Rights. People will see the truth themselves.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:06 PM
2

Not any more than the amount of feminists hating men. Really, it's pot calling the kettle black. Why don't they take a hard look at their own movement that hates on men? I love women though. So I find it pretty laughable to accuse me the complete opposite of what I am. It's a non-argument anyway, because we are CLEARLY focused on promoting equal laws. Feminists are CLEARLY focused on NOT promoting equal laws. Who's the bad person here, eh?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:54 PM
1

Correct. Not just rape, domestic abuse too. And good point on the Global Gender Gap Report. I remember Cristina Hoff Sommers covered that.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:32 PM
1

Nail on head. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=benevolent+sexism&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:24 AM
1

Yes, fairly often.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:50 AM
9

Let's not forget violence by proxy too.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:28 PM
1

I just checked it. They all showed up in Live.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:58 PM
7

So they accuse us of ignoring women's problems WHILE they are de facto in favor of ignoring men's problems. Just brilliant! Projection?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:44 PM
5

Until you get a biased judge and still lose and get the maximum penalty. You can't win.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:39 PM
8

Are you saying being seen as a utility for somebody else's use is a privilege?
/r/MensRights16/03/16 08:41 PM
6

"failure on the man's part, rather than someone else infringing on his rights to be free from bodily harm" Wow, super good point. On the other hand, women are given less accountability. So it's an accountability gap, along with the mentioned empathy gap. Put those two together, and it really makes sense. And yes, as a result, it's considered an "epic fail" and therefore funny.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:54 PM
1

Just feminist women.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:55 PM
2

Unfortunately, even when there is evidence contrary to the accuser or necessity for proper investigation, it is often disregarded.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 08:56 PM
5

If you care about rights of people in general, sure as hell don't vote for Republicans.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:04 AM
8

Just bring up facts. She's an establishment standard lying flip-flopping politician. What you don't like is her actions and policies. It's impossible to be sexist against facts. Also, more young women support Bernie than Hillary. How about that, eh.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 05:01 AM
1

The amount of fees alone is absolutely absurd. The way this works is absurd. To do what, something that's in the best interest of the child? And the man has to be punished with fees to do that?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:45 PM
2

Yes. SO EDIT OUT THE LINK ALREADY, u/BasicallyADoctor.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:44 PM
1

And not in the ways that feminists ever mention.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:28 PM
2

But the falsely imprisoned aren't REAL victims of course.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:35 PM
5

Yep, this never gets old to mention. Brainwash - The Gender Equality Paradox
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:22 PM
2

That statement may seem shocking lol
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:11 AM
2

That's fine. As long as we have our own leave.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:47 PM
3

There has been shifts both left and right. Regressive left, and yes, regressive right. Democrats used to be the worker's party, but it is no more since Bill/Hillary. So there have been shifts to the right within the democrats as well.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:35 PM
1

What............ the hell are you talking about?
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:59 AM
2

Excellent point. Use their own shitty logic right back at them. We know that if the genders were reversed they would be having none of that.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:40 AM
6

Horrible critique. First of all, MRM often claims "men suffer domestic abuse at least equally". Plenty of abuse other than violence can be just as damaging. Secondly, it's actually true that men suffer violence at a rate that is at least equal as well, so she's wrong there too. She is doing outright lying and cherry picking too. "men don't die as a result of domestic violence" Here is the same statistic she got hers from: "About seven women and two men are killed by current or former partners ev…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:53 AM
2

Guys, are you SURE Christina is actually a gynocentric feminist rather than an egalitarian feminist? There is a difference, and it's in the mindset. I have yet to figure out which one she is, but considering she wrote a book called "War on Boys" I have serious doubts she's a gynocentrist.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:46 AM
7

To make it even worse, it turns out "women engaged in significantly higher levels of controlling behaviour than men" http://www.bps.org.uk/news/women-more-aggressive-partners-men Yet, in their example of controlling behavior, they decided to use a male perpetrator. Of course they did. Of course. And in their website "story" section, as of now, no female perpetrators either. Of course. They do earn a bit of credit by making the quiz gender-neutral, so that's a start. Probably just to cover their …
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:15 AM
2

higher imprisonment rates I'm not sure what you mean here. If you mean higher punishment than women for the same crime, then yes. If you're talking about the skyrocketing imprisonment of people, men, and especially black men since the disastrous policies of Nixon and Reagan, then yes. If you mean more men in prison than women, I don't think that's going to be well received, so no.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:48 AM
2

You know what, this wouldn't be bad at all if this was an egalitarian movement that also included a SheForHe. People need to support each other. But, of course not! No support allowed for men. Do as you're told, robot!
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:12 PM
1

Wow. We need to expose this kind of shit further. Get some people to publish articles on this.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:02 PM
1

In all honesty, I think this is actually the main legit issue feminists have left in the West. On the other hand, many women don't actually want to lose the power of mystique they have over men in this regard. That will be lost to an extent if(when) the cultural norms change. So it's almost a non-privilege.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 11:10 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs82rCR-yro this is better I am a left-wing and liberal (non-regressive), but still have to agree with the conservative-type talk here. Cause it's true. Conserving a two-person family unit for the benefit of children is the ethical and right thing to do.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:57 PM
2

http://www.batteredmen.com/batdulut.htm Not sure on the specifics for different countries, but many countries are using this, including USA and Australia, so I bet Canada is too. The police are trained in it. Then combine the "white knighting" some cops might be doing and combine those two and it is a recipe for disaster. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=duluth+model&sort=top&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:37 PM
14

Nopes, you lose. You failed to mention "percentage point difference" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentage_point 342,000 is roughly 4/5 of 418,000. And so is 45/55. So there are 4/5 the reports from women. What's the difference? 1/5 = 20%.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:16 AM
1

I was accused of minimising the problem and wanting to grab valuable resources Oh, the amount of hypocrisy, irony, ignorance, and lack of introspection is quite high. Minimizing the problem. Heh. Don't mind me. We all know this is all too common.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:30 PM
1

Okay, I'm getting what you mean now. But in reality, what people infer from this image is that men aren't always polite to women, therefore women shouldn't always have to be either. How much truth there is to this I don't know, whatever. The way I see it is, the point of this post is to point out the double-standard: if a woman posts such an image, that's fine. If a man posts a similar image, he will likely be ridiculed. There is sarcasm involved. Maybe the downvoters didn't get that.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:40 PM
2

closing the wage gap would equalize salaries for the same amount of work I am happy to inform you that you don't have to worry about equalizing salaries for the same amount of work because they are already equal.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:41 PM
1

Why are they bogus? I haven't looked into it, so I'm just asking. I think this one is a lot more complicated than black and white. I am sure that there is a lot more difference in payouts between individuals of various socioeconomic status within each gender than between the averages of each gender. The system by design taxes the rich more, so yes, given that women work less and earn less than men, then you could say it shortchanges men. But by that same token, you could say it "shortchanges" th…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:26 PM
2

Pretty much, yes. If I had the choice, I would pick female. For all the reasons that have been covered already. Including the sexual aspect you mentioned. But here's a tip: there is a lot of varied information out there that has show men are just about as capable as women in the sex department. It just takes a lot more mental and physical learning and practice to do it. Just many other things, men often have to work harder to achieve the same thing. Except being a natural bodybuilder. I'll give …
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:16 AM
1

Google define:feminism gives me: "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men" Similar with Wikipedia. And we know feminist-controlled Wikipedia ought to get it right on the definition of feminism. So even beside the appeal to definition fallacy, it's still easy to beat them even by their own game. It's EXTREMELY OBVIOUS that all but the most condensed definition or description of feminism is about WOMEN's rights on the GROUNDS of equality TO …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter