TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aokna2736 Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by aokna2736 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Loving this series, it's inspiring me to think more seriously about long-term travel. Have you read Vagabonding by Ralph Potts? Very much in the same vein.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 05:50 PM
1

I agree that no one who just got rejected deserves that whole schpeel, and I agree that you're allowed to be upset. I'll cede that the comic was a bad way to convey the message, but I agree with the underlying message.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:12 AM
1

Well what do you see it as?
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:50 AM
2

Honestly? I agree. I think it's really sucky to get rejected, and if a friend-zone is just talking about "they don't see me as a romantic option," then I understand. doing good things for people in the hopes that they'll like you more for it is also valid. But they don't HAVE to like you, and you don't DESERVE their attraction just because you've been good to them. We all find people attractive, but we dont really choose who we find attractive. For both men and women, if someone doesnt isn't att…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:50 AM
1

If having a child was a choice you only made based on your income, then I would agree. But that's just not the case. Call it irresponsible reproduction if you want, but there are other factors that decide whether or not a mother keeps a child.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:55 AM
2

I agree, but a lot of the time when situations like this occur (mother wants to keep it, father doesn't) there are moral conflicts with abortion. If a 16 year old girl wants to keep the child that occurred because a condom broke, and her family is against abortion, does that mean the father can be exempt from paternal responsibilities? In reality, its still 50% his fault.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:23 PM
2

I understand this, and I agree that there should be a sort of "financial abortion" available to men, but the problem is that if a man chooses not be a father, there's still a baby. There's still a being that requires care and momey in order to care for it. Men leaving doesn't make the problem go away, whereas a woman getting an abortion does.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:14 PM
0

"Over the past century, it was labor-saving appliances, invented by men and spread by capitalism, that liberated women from daily drudgery." "Oh, sure, there will be the odd gun-toting Amazonian survivalist gal, who can rustle game out of the bush and feed her flock, but most women and children will be expecting men to scrounge for food and water and to defend the home turf." "Surely, modern women are strong enough now to give credit where credit is due!" These are the lines that I found to be a…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:35 AM
-3

While there are some great quotes and sections in this, I feel like the central point is "look at all the things men do for you. You're welcome," which is fairly condescending.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:17 AM
1

She said that there's a difference between what the actual requirements for the job are and the arbitrary requirements placed in the system. Again, not my area of expertise, so I don't know what requirements are necessary or not. Even if that is true (which im not convinced it is, although you bring up good counter arguments), the science and mathematics sector?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:17 PM
0

A lot of these points could be valid in themselves (for example, I don't believe that we should have to pay for women's birth control.) But when the person makes things out to be "lowering standards" like in the military/science career topics, it rejects the possibility that there are women who are just as deserving or even more deserving of the role. I don't have experience in the positions, so I don't know how often this is the case, but the absolutist diction makes it too much.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:12 PM
0

That may be so, but that point is prefaced by a solid two minutes of saying how equalizing women would require "lowering the standards," which just isnt true.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:07 AM
107

I think this swings too far on some points.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:18 PM
1

Oh, my bad. Apologetic upvote for you!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:47 AM
1

At 10 years old I would assume it was forced, as I don't think many kids have a working knowledge of sex at 10, but you may be right.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:26 AM
1

I don't understand how number 3 isn't a legitimate point.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:58 PM
1

See, this is the stuff that makes MR a huge affront to Feminism. You're extremely bigoted. The entire POINT of Mens Rights is to get EQUALITY for men. We are coming forward because things are flawed, and need to be fixed. We're not trying to swing the pendulum to the other side. We just want to make it better.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter