TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

apathetictransience Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by apathetictransience on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

What the fuck is a kino girl?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/17 02:27 AM
-18

Hahahahaha! Hilarious comment.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/17 06:43 AM
2

When you stop falling for intentionally inflammatory headlines that are explicitly designed to get your attention.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:27 PM
0

If you think they did it because feelings, emotions, or to protest Google, and not to make a broader statement to the entire tech industry, you're either delusional or stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 06:45 AM
1

Which, the chick or the dude with all the deliberate apostrophes at the end of his words?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 01:41 PM
25

oh I know it's not supposed to be
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 02:44 AM
71

a blanket anti-woman sub...on Reddit? I'm shocked.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 01:17 AM
12

I doubt the owner of a mom and pop drive-in cares.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/17 01:13 AM
0

You think I wasn't being facetious when I asked that?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/17 02:13 PM
1

Wasn't there when I asked. Reading is fucking hard huh?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:54 AM
1

lol that's your argument? Say whatever the fuck you want. Why bother supporting it with facts when just saying it is so much easier. What kind of fucking loser lies to people on the internet? Thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:46 AM
-5

I always forget how many kids there are on reddit...
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:27 AM
25

How do you know she's not being prosecuted?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:19 PM
0

lol who would be dumb enough to assume that?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/17 08:41 PM
0

Ability of logic is a weird way of saying it, it sounds like something someone would say if they just learned English. Logical capacity would make more sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/17 05:33 PM
1

ability of logic lol wtf does that even mean?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 01:52 AM
3

It's kind of weird that they only places I've seen this posted are here and the_donald.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/17 03:19 PM
1

bearing
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:30 AM
2

Yep, they are. There are way more men who can procreate than women, so each fertile woman's life, in the context of the furthering of the species, is inherently more valuable.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:23 AM
1

Basically a bunch of random people in SD are retarded.
/r/PussyPass16/03/17 10:25 AM
0

That's not hypocritical. That's just their prerogative.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:37 PM
2

Yep
/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:03 AM
1

Aren't opinions grand?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:36 AM
2

Nah I thought you were saying a substantial amount of people think it. Bro I said I was wrong. How am I a sore loser?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:23 AM
2

Ok, so your argument is there are technically people in the world that think it. Sorry for the confusion. It's such a generic, vapid statement, I assumed you were saying something relevant to the conversation. My bad.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 02:09 AM
2

What in the actual fuck are you talking about? People on the internet are not people? What in the actual fuck are you talking about dude? I basically said use of the term "people" is different from saying "some people on the internet"? Is English not your first language or are you just fucking retarded?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:50 AM
1

You've now provided two opinion blog posts to support your claim.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:47 AM
2

So what's the demographic 'people' in the statement we live in a time where people take comedians more seriously than newscasters ? I just asked this question and you have yet to answer it. You also still have not answered if you've actually taken a class on logic and debate.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:46 AM
2

When a claim is made, the burden of proof is on the claimer to provide evidence of that claim. Otherwise you can just run around saying whatever the fuck you want and expect to be taken seriously. This is what you actually said: we live in a time where people take comedians more seriously than newscasters Your evidence of that was a single opinion blog post by a nobody, and a vague reference to popular twitter accounts and others believing it. If the original intent of what you said was not that…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:31 AM
2

Again bro, you made the initial claim so the burden of proof is on you. Have you never taken a basic class on logic and debate? you did explicitly say that I made it up. where?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:59 AM
2

I'm not saying you made it up, I'm saying your sample size is way too small. You're taking something a few people on he internet said and thinking it applies to most people. THEN you tell me to come up with better evidence to support your opinion. You can fuck off whenever you want.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:41 AM
3

What do you expect me to do? Stop trying to convince people to agree with ideas you've formulated based on what you read on the internet. Where do you live that that's accepted as normal?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:56 PM
1

Yeah, why should you have to provide evidence to support your claim, when just saying it is so much easier?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:45 PM
2

many websites have written articles on it, and many shower thoughts and famous twitter users Ah so you DO use what you read on the internet as a basis for society at large. like I said with my 2nd link which you didn't have a rebuttal for Dude, are you fucking retarded? I'm not arguing that people trust journalists less, so why would I have a rebuttal? we don't need statistics to back up every single popular opinion Cool story. I'll just start basing my entire perception of society and culture o…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:27 PM
1

you're using an opinion blog post from some random person as evidence that people en masse trust comedians more than journalists?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:01 PM
3

people take comedians more seriously than newscasters. Now you're just making shit up. If you use comedians' material for anything other than making people laugh, you're completely misconstruing its intent. You strike me as someone who uses what they read on the internet as a basis for society and culture at large.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:46 PM
2

The point of his joke is to make you laugh. I'm 100% in the clear 100% in the clear from what? Random internet people not liking what you said?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:23 PM
3

Bro, anyone that thinks comics are trying to be present facts is a fucking idiot. You REALLY think Louis CK actually believes men are the #1 threat to women? All he cares about is if the audience finds what he says funny. If you don't find it funny, don't laugh. It's not the comic's fault his/her audience takes what is said as truth. I'll never understand why people get mad at comics trying to be funny. Unless you don't get that it's a joke, in which case, the anger makes sense.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:52 PM
7

So you think comics should only use facts in their jokes. Got it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:38 PM
10

a) Do you have any information regarding the context of this photo, outside of it being in an Australian school? Do you know the intent of the presentation? b) He's a comedian. Of course he's wrong, he's not trying to be right. He's trying to be funny. Jesus Christ, I had no idea that comedians are only supposed to state facts. Here I've been taking my social and moral cues from stand-up comedy for years.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:12 PM
25

Yeah bro..it's a fucking joke, it's called observational humor. You take a common truism or fact - many men hurt women - and you exaggerate it for comic effect - all men hurt women. If this joke out of all his offensive material is what turns you off to him, either you're really sensitive or you just don't get the joke.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:29 PM
12

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRzs7v0do_Q&feature=youtu.be&t=1m19s
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:16 PM
13

You realize this is a Louis CK quote right?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:53 PM
0

You probably should have said that the first time then.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:43 AM
-1

Yeah, if you think you can accurately judge the entirety of Western society from what you read on the fucking internet lol
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:20 PM
-3

lol how old are you? Haha you don't even live in the US. Maybe this double standard exists in the UK...
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:06 PM
1

I know, that's why I said thanks.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 08:09 PM
1

yup yup
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:29 PM
1

thanks for your contribution
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:13 PM
-4

Is it a double standard when the woman is bigger than the man? That's why I used the qualifier "on average". You really don't know how to fucking read, do you? I hope you don't do anything for a living that requires basic critical thinking. All I'm advocating is everyone keeping their hands to themselves and somehow that upsets you and sent you into this little tantrum. Yeah, you got your panties in a twist over that when NO ONE HERE was saying it's ok for people to not keep their hands to thems…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:18 PM
1

Haha ok, you still couldn't express your opinion/make an observation without resorting to name-calling, which makes any kind of rational debate pointless. Why don't you just call me a doodyhead, it'll hurt my feelings more.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:25 PM
0

Uh, because if you just resort to name-calling, how am I supposed to have a rational conversation with you? I love the fact that you're bothering to downvote my comments lol
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:14 PM
-1

Or maybe because you're being a retard? Bro, you really need to take a basic class on logic and reason. Enjoy your circlejerk.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:04 PM
-1

Do you even know what the word 'hypocritical' means? No one's saying one is less or more acceptable. I'm saying that from a purely logical, physical perspective, a man hitting a woman can and typically does result in way more physical harm than the converse, and is therefore not as dangerous as a woman hitting a man. This sub really is just a circlejerk. So far, I've seen people called a fuckwitt, a retard, and told to fuck off, SOLELY for disagreeing. You people don't want to talk about the iss…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:51 PM
-2

I seriously feel like I'm on /r/tumblr right now. NO ONE is defending violence against any gender. Like, you realize recognizing the that it's not a double standard and saying it's not socially acceptable aren't mutually exclusive, right? Is the point of this sub to have open honest discussion, or is it a circlejerk? I can't tell.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:24 PM
-9

He never fucking said it was ok for anyone to hit anyone. Yet you called him a fuckwitt for that. THAT's what's fucking ridiculous. On average, men are incredibly larger, stronger, and more powerful than women. So, on average, a man can easily overpower and do more physical damage to a woman than vice versa. And that's why it's not a double standard. No one made a value judgement on it. No one said one fucking word about whether or not it's ok for anyone to hit anyone. Yet you're so fucking sens…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:11 PM
-13

You guys really are as sensitive as any SJW. It's really funny to see how pissy you all get when anyone disagrees with you that women hitting men isn't as big of an issue as men hitting women. This place is easily as much of a circlejerk as any tumblr site, it's just at the other end of the spectrum. You're both equally ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter