TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

apekillape Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by apekillape on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I disagree. I think it's a result of the biology of what makes us a male. Testicles make testosterone and closely related animals all behave the same way. I don't think men evolved to be stronger because they tended to NEED to be stronger, but it was a result of evolving something else for entirely different reasons. Hoo boy.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 10:33 PM

Is it just specifically Title II that you take issue with then? Outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private". And the rest of it in regard to housing, voting, desegregation and the like are cool?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:37 PM

I'd argue that we make these amendments specifically to interpret the spirit of the Constitution over the letter in cases exactly like this. At the root of it, it's all meant to provide that singular item: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for each citizen. The rest is just variations on that theme. So while I agree that it can be interpreted from a strict and local reading as unconstitutional to those discriminating businesses, the fallout of permitting a business group to not service …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:01 PM

I'm just gonna copy from Wikipedia here as it's phrased reasonably: Congress asserted its authority to legislate under several different parts of the United States Constitution, principally its power to regulate interstate commerce under Article One (section 8), its duty to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment and its duty to protect voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment. Is it not the government's duty to ensure the liberty of all citizens? By…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:17 PM

No, I don't. I think the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a mistake that should not stand constitutional muster. No seriously, I want to hear this.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 09:54 PM
4

I hear you man, that's why I spread the gospel (the story below) after that. Being on this side of the mirror now, it seems so silly. You look back like present generations look back at how racist earlier ones were, like "Hahaha what the fuck were they (I) thinking?" I've noticed too that the only people who are super vocally against it tend to be the same dudes who say "Oh I would never have sex with a woman over 40" or "Pointy elbows 2/10 would not bang", i.e. really sexually inexperienced. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 06:13 PM
8

Oh totally. This one time I was in the bar my friends run and I met this girl who was, well, fat. She was super cute, but like straight up round. We got to talking for a while, cause it's not like I'm going to just ignore her because she's overweight, and then I ended up defending her from this prick who got in our conversation and said something unkind about her weight. Then when we were walking back in from the smoking area together she just leans in and starts making out with me. Now, if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 01:16 PM
4

What's up with that? "Never" is a weird place to go sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 12:44 PM
3

You ever have sex with a fat woman? It's... surprisingly way better than expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 12:29 PM
2

I use the phrase "I want a woman who can take a punch" sometimes when I'm trying to explain this, but your way is probably better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 12:28 PM
1

I hear ya, I was just going straight for him because that's what you requested. No sense in bringing up old shit, that's just bad science. I mean, how big of an asshole would I have to be to just dismiss it because I was unfamiliar with new findings, haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 12:53 AM
1

I'm honestly not up to date on new stuff from Buss, so I've got some reading to do before I make a proper go of it. Don't want you to think I'm dodging ya, I just don't want to be that asshole who makes up a statement and then cites papers to back it that he hasn't read and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 11:03 PM
1

Alright, it's not in terms of Red Pill justifications, just Buss's theories in general? Sure, let's rumble. Gimme a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 08:59 PM
1

Calm down, I got a million things going on over here. Did they take away your right to breakfast or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:12 PM
1

Women were and are privileged legally. They have rights men don't, while the opposite is not true. Just so we're clear here, you're stating that women had and have all rights legally that men do, plus some? I'll assume we're working from 1960ish on, since second-wave feminism was mentioned earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 04:58 PM
1

They already had equal rights. Attitudes? Give me a break. My reply was directly addressed there. If you really want to do this, whip it out and I'll address your nonsense point-by-point in a nice clean format. In the meantime here in the real world we'll be dealing with actual problems and not your "imaginary first world" ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 04:23 PM
2

Brown v. Board of education was in 1954, but the National Guard still had to protect those kids in Little Rock in '57. One could make an argument integration still isn't really a thing yet in 2016 even. People don't just up and change the day legislation happens. Additionally, while I'm sure you have a whole brochure about the many and varied rights women had over men in 1960 when everything was magical, best case you could make is that men had a shitty time of things. That ain't a "women were d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 03:51 PM
2

In that specific case nah, because I'd have no idea why I can't get laid and then suddenly the curse wears off at 35 when I get my billion dollars. Man, that'd actually be super fucked up if you never knew the two were related. You'd just assume they're screwing you for the money the rest of your life, no one would recover from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 05:59 AM
2

Nope, I'm a high school dropout who does Post-Doctoral research in a Genetics lab. That's a whole other can of worms. I can, however, cite the overwhelming glut of peer-reviewed papers that disprove everything I've previously heard from the Red Pill's ambassadors both individually and as a group, and show Evolutionary Psychology to be complete clown shoes. But I reckon it'd be unsporting to start with someone else's argument, so I figured I'd ask you for yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 03:31 AM
2

I will have this argument every time it comes up as long as I have to. Please state outright which primate behaviors you're speaking of specifically, and how they relate to specific Red Pill "theories". I'd be more than happy to clear up how biology works for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 03:13 AM
2

Autistes don't really have an alternative view on thinking. Unless you consider being pedantic and ignoring social cues alternative view. I do! It's like how people say "We need more minority writers/directors/whatever" in Hollywood. It's not just to tick a diversity box, it's because there's a lot of different perspective that comes from that background versus the default "white guy" perspective, so when you have people from somewhere else involved even working on the same thing it influences i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 03:04 AM
3

Wouldn't be about me anyway, so far as I can tell I'm not autistic, haha. But there's definitely an argument to be made that autists have a useful place in society. Alternative styles of thinking come in handy all over the place, even when they're not Rainman-level savants. When we start removing diversity from the gene pool it preps us to get wiped out all in one fell swoop when something unexpected changes in the environment. If there were autistic dinosaurs they might still be alive today.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 02:48 AM
2

Eh. It's like peruvians in DoTA, you only notice the ones who give the rest a bad name. Also, they ain't gonna learn how to be human if they can't observe it in the "wild". Online is reasonable training wheels for society in a pinch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 02:42 AM
2

I think this depends a bit on if you know the rules ahead of time. Do I know about the money? And is it like a 40 Days and 40 Nights situation where ass is getting thrown at me and I just can't accept it, or am I just about that Incel life until I magically hit 35 and all bets are off? Frankly, if it's just a matter of willpower I could do 35 years standing on my head. But if it's a Black Mirror nightmare scenario where I'm just magically unable to close the deal for that long... I dunno if I'd …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 02:37 AM
3

I'm going to assume you're not involved with any field that actually tests for or uses data like this, because you're kind of... wrong from several angles. By that I mean not just fundamentally at the root, it's like every branch of the wrong tree is special in its own way here. First, as several posters have mentioned, IQ tests don't stand up in terms of validity or standardization. Validity in that the questions aren't a useful measurement of intelligence overall, and standardization in that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 11:38 PM
7

I don't see how the two examples are equivalent. In the promiscuity angle, the threat is that you'll be cheated on. Not great, but it happens. In the violence angle, the threat is that you'll be beaten to death. Apples and bludgeons, yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 11:04 PM
4

In a two-year-old article? Unlikely.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 06:19 AM
1

Again, I'm speaking simply of the situations presented within the above video and the motivations of the onlookers. The video in the park. Only. Situation A: This person is incapable of removing themself from the situation. It behooves me to intervene. Situation B: This person could leave, but is sticking it out. My intervention won't do a damn thing. In Situation B, the person could leave at any time from the perspective of the passers by. Nothing will change by intervening.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 10:37 AM
1

I definitely agree that no one seems to think female-on-male abuse is a problem, especially in the face of it actually being a legitimate problem. But those aren't the examples we were given. That video was slanted as hell, beyond the gender issues. Removing the m and f from the video, in the first one the larger person was preventing the smaller one from escaping or seeking help. Anyone with any sense should rightfully have stepped in simply to equalize the playing field. It just ain't right. B…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 04:01 AM
-9

Maybe I'm a giant misandrist, but in the case of the park abuse the difference between "GIANT dude and skinny young girl" versus "reasonably sized woman and dude who could probably take her" made all of the difference to me. The male abuser was also forcing the woman to stay there, whereas the female abuser seemed to be trying to drive the guy away in several cases. Eliminating gender from either example still makes one largely different and much more actionable than the other.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 03:22 AM

There you go.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 12:36 PM
1

I think this debate has a lot in common with racial topics. Regardless of how right or wrong you are, it's gonna get ugly just bringing it up. There's a painful history with the victims in both areas, so it triggers all sorts of fury-inducing memories and anecdotes that just muddy the issue. No one can think straight because it's so personal. Specific to the rape/assault debate, we're not far enough (or even really away from at all) the place where people still blame the victims no matter what. …
/r/MensRights09/05/11 10:18 PM
-2

Before Fight Club came out these sorts of people just used to be fake bikers. I wonder if Harley Davidson has noticed a drop in sales now that people find their pre-packaged "danger" somewhere else. Ugh.
/r/MensRights02/05/11 01:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter