TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

applejackpatches Archive

View 2 posts and 193 comments by applejackpatches on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Question For Menapplejackpatches/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 11:36 AM
2

Question For Menapplejackpatches/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I wouldn't say so, for me it had to do with how safe and accepted I felt. Then I have the rug pulled out from under me and came crashing down to reality. Physical attraction for me is just pass/fail, I don't really compare men beyond that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 04:50 PM
1

Homeboy really thinks I'm somehow insulted by not being as young and hot as the bimbos he keeps company with. I'd rather look like Eric Stolz in Mask than be a trash person. Looks are fleeting, character is forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 06:08 PM
4

Classy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 10:13 PM
5

So you dated trash women, which says more about you than anything else, and then want to generalize their behavior to all women and view all women as NPCs? k.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 08:49 PM
5

My ex-husband withheld sex as punishment. I know what it's like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:51 PM
5

Withholding sex or any other kind of withholding (e.g. affection, communication, etc) is a form of abuse if the intention is to hurt, manipulate, or punish a partner. This is obviously different from genuinely not wanting to have sex due to low libido or feeling withdrawn after an argument. It's also not just something that can be used against "weak men." Anyone, man or woman, attractive or unattractive, can be a victim of withholding.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:34 PM
2

It depends on why. If a guy has looks standards that are too high, he'll need to work on lowering those (same goes for women). If that isn't the issue and a guy is being realistic about physical attractiveness then I don't think what you're suggesting would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:04 PM
7

It's true for me and my friends and I'm sure it's true for most women honestly. Talking to multiple men at once feels off.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:09 PM
7

Men are responsible for men and the incentives they give women. Women are responsible for women and the incentives they give men. I think your post follows that logic. Those of us who are not introspective enough to realize what we are really pursuing do so to our own detriment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:15 PM
–

I'm suggesting great guys get posted about all the time. A vindictive woman being pissed off at a great guy doesn't make him not a great guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:56 PM
–

Not true, if a trash woman gets pissed off at a great guy she knows he'll end up on the app with all the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:38 PM
1

Then you get what you pay for
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:32 PM
-1

Oh I know you didn't say bimbo. I'm saying that. Women who are uninteresting never had to develop personalities because they could rely on sex appeal. All I know is what I have witnessed since middle school, which is that men tend to give attention to the wrong types of women and then want to whine about the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:26 PM
3

I think maybe we're misunderstanding each other. What if I were to say men should practice cold approaching through random interactions with strangers? The point is getting over the discomfort and becoming better at conversation, both of which are necessary skills for cold approaching women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:20 PM
2

I don't know that "most women" are complete bimbos, but you're right in that there are plenty of women with trashy, unattractive personalities. Kind, interesting women are less visible because we aren't trying to use our looks or our bodies to get romance. So men don't notice us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:04 PM
3

Making small talk with strangers is uncomfortable if you're not used to doing it. It's a way of conditioning yourself to face discomfort and gain confidence so it's a bit easier to start cold approaching. You know, wade in the kiddy pool before jumping in the deep end. Weird and awkward cold approaches are the whole reason women don't want to be approached anymore. So fix the weird and awkward before you start cold approaching. I don't mind being approached by a respectful man. I do mind being a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 02:54 PM
-3

That's because a bunch of guys have porn brain and approach bimbos
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 02:48 PM
6

I get what she's trying to articulate but most women miss the mark. You can't go from 'tism to 100. My suggestion to men is to get comfortable approaching random people, man or woman, and just make small talk and practice that way. Just low stakes conversations until you're more of a social butterfly. Focus on process over outcome. Then you can cold approach, make friendly conversation, and ask a woman out if it's clear she's enjoying the conversation and her eyes aren't glazing over. When you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 02:28 PM
0

That only works when a guy has already decided that he doesn't mind forgoing sex on the first date because he couldn't possibly know prior to the date whether he wants to wife someone up. Attractive men who can get laid won't bother waiting to get to know a woman if sex isn't involved up front. So if you aren't willing to sleep with those guys they'll never find out whether you're wife material or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 01:18 AM
1

That's fair
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 01:08 AM
4

As in women lose interest if you don't sleep with them? I don't doubt it, I know some guys who had that problem. Hookup culture is cancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:55 PM
1

Your experience has been the opposite of mine. I've got some really close girlfriends who are putting themselves out there and have been struggling. I'm on a break for now but before that I had trouble too despite trying to see if there's some pattern I'm missing. Ultimately, I just don't like the idea of assuming people are struggling because they're not quality partners. It's just not always the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:54 PM
9

Nah, being a quality partner almost makes it harder. Everyone else is incentivized to engage in bad behavior so there's constant pressure to just give in. Quality people have to weed through a lot of garbage before they find each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:37 PM
0

I don't but there is a lot of pressure for women to do so. Men lose interest quickly if you don't sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:32 PM
4

I don't think the situations on r/deadbedrooms are happening because women aren't being valued for sex. There's usually something else going on under the surface. For women, libido tends to change over time in long term relationships and it takes work to keep our sex lives active and healthy. I understand that it's useful to have discussions like these in transactional terms like "value," but you shouldn't be living your life on these terms. Relationships require mutual self-sacrifice. You give …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 03:00 PM
7

Most men who try to swipe on me look like slobs, many are overweight, have horrible facial hair, whine about dating in their bio, don't share my values, and end up being really timid if I do end up going on a date with them. I don't understand where anyone, man or woman, gets it in their head that attractiveness is a one way street. I put effort into looking good and being the sort of person who is worth pursuing. I expect some sort of reciprocity there. The aspects of my character and attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 08:31 PM
1

What do you mean begin my own undoing? I have no idea what that refers to. Like I replied to others, there are fewer men in my pool than for women who engage in hookup culture. It makes it harder to find a relationship and it sucks. It's not the ghosting so much as it's the scarcity that the culture has created.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:21 AM
1

I'm gonna agree to disagree on being used for money being as bad as being used for sex. If that were true then someone who steals $20 from your wallet would receive the same punishment as a rapist. The ghosting and vetting isn't actually the issue, it's being penalized by the culture for being disciplined. It's way easier to get into a relationship if you're promiscuous. If I'm disciplined about what I eat and working out, I know I'll get results. Being sexually disciplined doesn't guarantee nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:15 AM
1

That's not the point...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:04 AM
1

It's not so much that they directly pressure me into having sex (usually). But when the topic comes up and I say I prefer to wait I get hit with "we're not compatible." Or they'll ghost not long after that conversation. I don't want these particular men per se, it's just frustrating that the pool of men willing to wait is artificially small because our culture rewards promiscuity. You can be the most perfect partner in the world, but when given the choice a lot of men will choose the cheaper, qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:03 PM
2

The piece you're missing is the overwhelming pressure placed on women to "put out" to get into a relationship. If you try to date prudently and wait to have sex until a genuine, mutually rewarding connection is formed, men who are actually capable of attracting women ignore or reject you. How do I know this? I know this because that's how I try to date. It's like being an ugly unicorn. Like sure, you're a rare breed but that's not enough to interest people. As soon as you express that you aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:55 PM
2

I think you're right. I remember everyone looked a lot nicer when I visited Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:00 PM
4

I don't think most men actually smell or have dirty fingernails. I'd say A LOT have horrible haircuts, facial hair, and wardrobe choices. I see a lot of the Duck Dynasty look. Even if they are well cared for those beards look dirty and disgusting. I don't see many men with a decent sense of style and their clothing isn't properly fitted/tailored. I'm not an expert on matching men's haircuts to face shapes but I suspect a lot of men would benefit from that as well. I'd say 50-70% of men fall into…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:12 PM
4

Not true, most of my mental health problems are physiological. I've got Hashimoto's and the medications and supplements I'm on are like an on/off switch for depression/anxiety. My mood gets low whenever I need an adjustment. I suspect a lot of men have similar issues without knowing it and a lot of the arbitrary expectations were driven by feeling like dirt in the first place, not the other way around. The modern environment is horrible for human health.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:29 PM
–

I'm very petite, it's rare for me to even find a man who is shorter than me. I think it's reasonable to want to date a man who is the same height or slightly taller but at a certain point it gets way too superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 12:58 PM
–

The only woman I've ever met who cared is exactly the type of woman you don't want to date. Part of the reason I ended our friendship is I got sick and tired of watching her treat men like garbage. Literally the most self-absorbed person I've ever met. Average height is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 04:20 AM
2

Still more than you've ever done champ.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:09 PM
-1

You sound like a rapist. Like really? Women have to become sex slaves for soldiers now? Go light a candle for Elliot Rodger you nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 11:00 PM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:52 PM
–

I feel this so much
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:11 PM
0

MLK did that to serve a higher purpose. Did I really need to spell that out? Don't sit here and tell me that draft dodging amounts to the courage he had or the courage men who go to war have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:03 PM
1

There are some, I'm guessing those guys are pretty high ranking though, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:54 PM
0

I'm not physically capable of serving in combat. I did serve though and that means being willing to die if need be, even if it's unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:53 PM
3

I'm a veteran. The military is my family. Most Americans, men or women, don't give a shit and will vote without regard for what the military will be asked to do. That's not a women problem, that's a problem with the entire country.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:46 PM
1

Lol, they'd never put draftees in a fighter jet, first of all. Firing a rifle wouldn't be a problem but the physical demands of marching long distances with 60+ pounds of gear, pulling a wounded soldier out of harms way, or hauling ass to get out of the line of fire. That eliminates most women from combat. Women can be drafted into other types of roles and I wouldn't have an issue with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:43 PM
-1

Voting has never been the "reward" for getting drafted. Only white landowning males over 21 could vote when the country was founded and I'm pretty sure the average soldier didn't own land back then. Are you going to also say men with disabilities can't vote? Do men who age out of the draft lose their right to vote?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:37 PM
0

You're right, I'm not personally affected by it because I've grown up and lived my adult life around volunteers. I don't know that I'd call risking criminal charges "courage."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:34 PM
1

You're right about that, there are some things no one is truly prepared for and warfare is one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:30 PM
1

How about the fact that a country is more than just the women in it? Or the fact that women not having sex with certain men doesn't mean they "don't give a fuck about them?" Like, really, I have to have sex with men to give a fuck about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:25 AM
0

Couldn't help that I'm a woman so I did what I could. I definitely wasn't munching on MREs all day, that's for sure. Even if that was the case, that'd just make me a hypocrite. It wouldn't absolve gutless worms of their cowardice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:20 AM
1

Yeah but they're hypocrites
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:11 AM
0

"I won't go fight in a war because women won't have sex with me." Again, it's truly a mystery as to why that might be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:07 AM
-4

That's not what that meant. It meant that men aren't entitled to sex because they've served their country.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:56 AM
0

wut
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:50 AM
1

It's true that wars overall require lower manpower and a lot of operations require more technical skills, but if we're talking about a large scale conflict with another world power, we might very well need a draft. My guess is that most technical positions would be filled with volunteers, but I'd have to think on that more, it's a good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:49 AM
-5

"Women won't have sex with me so I won't serve my country." Gee, I wonder why that could be?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:45 AM
-1

"Women don't deserve protection from men they won't have sex with." I don't think duty to one's country has ever been a sexual transaction. Some of you clowns really have opinions like this and then wonder why women think you're low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:43 AM
0

Ok, how many of you are going to come in with this reductive crap? None of you know what you are talking about. That's not how it works. Go study military science and strategy then come talk to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:16 AM
1

Except we're not talking about Ukrainians. You've been watching footage from Ukraine, not reading joint doctrine. War won't go neatly according to plan, it will be messy, in a large conflict there will be many casualties, but the US military doesn't just send in a bunch of guys in to absorb bullets until the enemy runs out. I do, in fact, actually know what I'm talking about because I've actually been formally educated on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:01 AM
-2

Uh huh, yes the many men I know who have seen combat and would kill for their wives are castrated losers. Sure. They're castrated losers because they've managed to not hate women. They're better men than you who know the meaning of sacrifice and want to protect women, not let them be slaughtered. Because they're real men of character. But if calling Americans castrated losers helps you be content with yourself, fine. If you don't care about social media shaming, you can always stop replying, fri…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:23 AM
1

Makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:36 AM
1

Yeah but progressives would have you believe that all war is imperialist if there is a mismatch in strength.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:26 AM
0

yeah that'd be what I mean by overwhelmed
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:10 AM
1

I agree, I don't want anyone dying for a billionaire. Trust in institutions needs to be restored, ultimately. There are people who are supposed to assess what our vital interests are but that class has lied so much no one knows what to believe anymore. Yeah, Europeans can quit whining. Definitely need to pull their weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:08 AM
1

I know some who wouldn't serve under certain presidents. I think it's distrust of the motivations for war in general. We lost the plot with GWOT big time, so I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:06 AM
1

What makes you think I'm some sort of deranged, delusional feminist? I don't think that, like, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:54 AM
0

I hear you. You've given an actual reason though, other guys haven't is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:52 AM
1

It's still against our vital interests. I agree that we can and should be energy independent, but relying on global supply chains means its in our interest to make sure countries without their own oil have access to it elsewhere. We're in too deep to isolate at this point. If we achieve clean, renewable energy and didn't need oil, there are still other raw materials to worry about. It doesn't feel as heroic as fighting the Nazis and it's ugly but that's where the world is at for now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:50 AM
-5

I come from a military family and I served myself. War has been fought on the backs of volunteers for half a century now. If the US gets into a conflict big enough to overwhelm the all-volunteer force and a draft is necessary, I won't take kindly to gutless worms.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:41 AM
1

You'd be better prepared than a lot of the guys who would be drafted, but you yourself wouldn't be drafted
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:20 AM
1

I've got Hashimoto's and I'm a woman. My own body desperately wants me to be fat, but I'm not fat. I think it's fair for men and women to expect some level of reciprocity with things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:16 AM
1

Touche
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:13 AM
2

I still can't believe she said this out loud and didn't die from the embarrassment
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:11 AM
-2

Thank you for being a sane human being
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:10 AM
0

I think he's one of those fatties who picked up the lingo from discord and thinks he's some sort of green beret now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:08 AM
-6

I have no idea what this is referencing
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:05 AM
1

I don't think a regional war would require a draft, wars in general require fewer personnel than they used to. Plus the all-volunteer force we have now is a lot more professional and effective. My grandfather got away with drunk driving through the barracks on his motorcycle, you'd never get away with that nowadays. If there was a draft we'd be talking about a huge conflict.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:04 AM
-1

I agree, they wouldn't be going for men in their forties. Most military guys who make it a career retire around 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:01 AM
1

I mean, in terms of not wanting to date the average young guy, sure. 40% of men 20-39 are overweight or obese, for example. That's not outright disdain for men though. Americans in general, men and women, need to start doing better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:59 PM
1

It sucks, it really does
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:51 PM
-3

Ah yes, your wife, who you'd lovingly send off to war to die to make sure women are "humbled." If you want women to get drafted, then you'd have be ok with her getting drafted too. A man can kill a woman with his bare hands. The opposite is not true. Being weaker means we will always be more physically vulnerable than men and that comes with mortal risks of its own. We have a lower risk of homicide but a higher risk of being killed by an intimate partner. Homicide is the leading killer of pregna…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:49 PM
2

Ah, I gotcha. Well, hopefully they're on their way out too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 PM
1

Yeah, wouldn't apply to you then
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:28 PM
-6

The election just repudiated all of that. Most women don't hate young men. The only women I've ever met who think men are trash tend to be trash themselves. With any luck we'll see a reversal of all the insanity and start treating men with respect again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:27 PM
-4

Men aren't sent to war as punishment, they're sent because it's necessary. Sending in women who can't fight effectively, fully expecting more of them to die, is punishment. Honestly, that's just a hateful, spiteful opinion. Genuine misogyny. You're no better than the man-hating feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:16 PM
1

Yeah, I don't think it'd apply to you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:07 PM
-2

If you send women into battle you'd end up with more women dying than men for obvious reasons. Is that what you mean by serving equally? Or would it be civil service that'd be in line with their physical abilities?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:03 PM
-9

The first part of your answer is more of what I had in mind for this question. The answers saying outright that they'd draft dodge kind of makes me assume they're fat or spineless or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:59 PM
1

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss oil. I'm not saying the US has always made good decisions on that front or in the Middle East in general, quite the contrary, but there are cases where it would be appropriate to use force to ensure access to it. That would still probably be a regional conflict that wouldn't require a draft though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:52 PM
0

Yeah, I'm talking a WWIII scenario. The US would have a really hard time justifying a draft for anything less than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:47 PM
1

Still not gonna tell me how you know what a real war is like?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:43 PM
1

Wrong again. When someone resorts to ad hominems it means they got nothing. Also, I'm a she, not a he, genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:31 PM
0

So the answer is no, you've never served, and don't know what you're talking about. I've served and studied military science and strategy. Yes, casualties are inevitable, no that does not mean sending troops into a meat grinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:23 PM
0

Uh, you'd end up with the opposite of equality of outcome. More women would die than men because of the obvious. Also, I'm not a feminist, and as the election just proved, most Americans don't want DEI nonsense. Do you want equity or ridiculous attempts at making everything in life perfectly equal? I certainly don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:13 PM
0

Russians have been throwing bodies at conflicts long before NATO was established. And how do you know how a real war works? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that you've never served.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:08 PM
0

I mean, you can draft women all you want but most wouldn't meet fitness requirements for infantry or similar combat roles. It'd be like drafting a bunch of disabled men to make sure they're being asked to serve the same way able-bodied people men. They'd show up and immediately be disqualified from service for obvious reasons. I would support women being drafted into civil service to contribute to the war effort though, as long as they aren't the sole caregiver for children or in a critical fiel…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 09:53 PM
-1

That's not how it works. We aren't the Russians just throwing bodies at a conflict. Even during Vietnam American draftees were well-trained. In any modern conflict draftees would need training to be an effective force. I'm asking how many men are prepared to be soldiers, not cannon fodder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 09:46 PM
1

Oh for sure. I don't think the average guy has your kind of skills though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 09:31 PM
1

Gotcha. I think the only problem I would have with that is what constitutes "proof" that an allegation was false. A confession? False confessions are a thing and I would guess the psychological factors at play would put victims at a higher risk. It's definitely something where you'd have to tread carefully and I imagine it'd be even harder to prove an allegation was false than it is to prove legitimate rapes. Unfortunately "he said, she said" cuts both ways in SA, whether genuine or false, and l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 04:11 PM
2

Yep. Exactly. It goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:47 PM
2

Reread what you wrote and misunderstood. You're only referring to the sentencing of proven false allegations correct? Not going on a witch hunt for false accusers? Ending hookup culture and rampant alcohol abuse at universities would be a start. Those provide ample opportunity for false accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:02 PM
4

I get what you're saying and I agree. I never knew where those numbers came from. Some in this post are trying to claim that it PROVES the opposite. I highly doubt there are more false accusations than real ones. And like most things fringe feminists weaponized something that started with good intentions. Believe women should apply to credible women in your friend or family circle. It should not apply in the court of public opinion or criminal court.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 02:37 PM
2

Then you end up with a bunch of actual rape victims going to prison because SA can be hard to prove in court. In fact that already does happen sometimes. When there is a conflict between punishing the guilty and protecting the innocent, you choose the innocent. It's better to have false accusers walk free than sending a bunch of rape victims to prison. And I don't take it lightly that it means men who have been falsely accused don't get justice. It's a disgusting, horrible thing to do to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 02:26 PM
–

Gotcha, I understand now
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 10:38 PM
–

Ooof yeah, I remember that movie. I already get sad thinking about how lonely a lot of Americans are, I think an AI component would make it feel like society will never end the loneliness epidemic and will rely on these sorts of crutches forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:24 PM
–

I have a theory that it's actually the other way around. The mental illnesses contributed to the ideology. I have multiple chronic illnesses that can cause depression and anxiety, so through no fault of my own I've hit some pretty low points in my life. I definitely sympathized more with leftist ideologies when I felt really low. My family is pretty sure all of our health problems are from chemicals we were exposed to while living on military bases. All of those hormone disruptors are common so …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:20 PM
–

Right, but coping down doesn't fix the root cause of the original issue. That should be the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 08:27 PM
–

AI relationships will be a disaster. I'm sure some people can lie to themselves and make it feel real but an AI bf/gf doesn't choose you. It does what the algorithm tells it to do. I'm sure plenty disagree with that but that's my opinion on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:38 PM
–

Why thank you! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 01:57 PM
–

I partially agree with this, but extreme progressive feminism is only the part of the problem. All of society as it exists right now is bringing out the worst in men and women. If tomorrow there were no progressives and the ideology magically disappeared, social media would still be here contributing mental illness, loneliness, and all sorts of other social problems. Dating apps would still suck. Porn would still be objectifying women and causing addiction in men. Red pill and manosphere are fil…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 12:11 PM
–

The 1950s called, they want their lobotomy back.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 03:15 AM
–

People understand tariffs make products more expensive, they're bad economic policy but good national security policy in China's case. They try to starve US companies out in strategically important sectors by subsidizing the Chinese-made products. Things like semi-conductors, medical syringes, solar cells, lithium batteries. The stuff you don't want China to monopolize. The US companies can't compete with artificially low prices forever, it's anti-competitive. Painful in the short term, keeping …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 02:43 AM
1

Did you not pick up on the obvious sarcasm there?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:40 AM
5

I guess I'll never smile at a man again in case I'm smiling at a rapist. THIS IS HOW YOU SOUND
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 09:54 PM
30

Men do the same thing women do. Complain about the worst types of women... and then pursue exactly those types of women. If they do pursue the girl who will treat them well, they end up bored or freaked out by genuine affection and then continue going for the same garbage they were before.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 08:15 PM
4

I thought the discussion was about who should or should not support a child in situations where the mother decides to keep the child. As in should the father be able to sever ties in that case or not. I don't understand how cases where the mother decides to get an abortion would apply to child support legislation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 11:59 AM
0

Obviously this only applies to kids who will be born.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 11:48 AM
0

You know for once I wish we could actually focus on what is in best interest of children instead of the desires of adults. If the parents of millenials/zoomers weren't so entitled and selfish and actually put the effort they should have into parenting then we wouldn't have half the problems in society that we currently do. Maybe the right question isn't who should be paying for the kid but what will produce the best outcomes for the kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 11:17 AM
3

I'm not saying men are bad for not wanting to date women with kids. That doesn't change the fact that women with kids end up in less than ideal situations. Like it's understandable but it still sucks for those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:21 PM
7

She said the remarriages were mediocre because they were single moms who had to "settle" to get into relationships. We've created a culture where terrible men and women have an easier time preying on men and women who would make good partners. We've also got a masculinity and femininity crisis and a personal responsibility crisis across the board. That's my theory on where the problems are coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 01:56 PM
5

The "be unapologetically yourself" advice is a counterweight to women who feel pressured by cultural sources (e.g. Hollywood actresses, runway models, fashion magazines, makeup companies). It's also a counterweight to our reaction to rejection. I think this is the case for men and women but you'll have some who react to rejection by going "I guess he wasn't my person," some who say "he must have been a terrible guy if he turned me down and I don't need to improve myself for any man, " and some w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 01:19 PM
14

I don't think this is what she's trying to say. The marriages were mediocre because women had no agency to choose who they wanted to be with. Then single mothers were viewed as lesser and ended up settling in relationships they weren't happy in. Bad relationships are easier to get into for men AND women because fewer people are willing to be in a relationship with a bad partner so there's no shortage of bad partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 01:08 PM
1

None of the traits I listed are incompatible with kindness or necessitate cruelty.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:38 PM
0

It's not women's responsibility to become attracted to wimps. Men can and should cultivate characteristics that are more attractive to women. You can be independent, confident, capable, or engage in healthy amounts of risk-taking without being a "bad boy" or going overboard and becoming inauthentic. But since men in this subreddit are allergic to personal responsibility they don't think they should have to do any work to become more attractive to women. All they can do is sit and whine and blame…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 01:13 PM
3

At least some of those are probably talking about the overtly arrogant f-boys. Everyone can sense their toxicity though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 12:38 PM
1

That's where boundaries surrounding that topic come in. It can't just be used on a whim or to get your way. A leader only uses authority for a specific, intended purpose. A man might use leadership to keep the family safe in a real, dangerous situation, but wouldn't use it when picking a house because that comes down to preferences. It's not supposed to be imposing your will on someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 05:02 PM
2

It's the internet, if you haven't figured out that you have to be very specific and precise with your words over email, text, messaging, or comment threads then I don't know what to tell you. I'm not being dense, you're being callous and using insulting phrasing to get your point across. Saying "women pick men that are better than them" is the worst possible way you could have gotten your point across.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:58 PM
1

It's not. If you're a leader who isn't incorporating the ideas of others or setting a vision for others to decide how to execute on, you're not a leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:56 PM
1

I have no problem with traditional households. I have a problem with men who say they want a traditional household and when asked to describe what they mean by that, they describe EXACTLY what I said. I have actually spoken with men like this, I have spoken with women who have been with men like this, and this is how some redpill content creators describe a traditional household. They don't describe situations where women are submissive by trusting a worthy man. They describe situations where a …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:45 AM
1

So your entire argument is that a woman is literally a worse decision-maker than a man-child? With nothing but pure misogyny to back that up? Charming. You do realize the species would be extinct right now if women were incapable of making good decisions, right? You know that men had to leave women with the children, sometimes for extended periods of time, to go off to war or go hunt or go work? And that raising miniature suicide machines into fully grown human beings who are capable of survivin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:45 AM
2

Those things can be correlated with leadership qualities but those aren't what ultimately define a good leader, first of all. A scientist spending 16 hours a day on advanced research is highly intelligent but might be a terrible leader. I can name plenty of people with a lot of wealth and social status who would make terrible leaders. A lot of women pick men with high intelligence, wealth, and social status but are also sociopaths with terrible character. I don't know about you but I'd rather be…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:34 AM
1

You do realize that no analogy is perfect, right? I understand that women are not being forced into literal slave labor with no wages and no ability to get out. What I am suggesting by comparing misogynistic pigs' view of women with slavery is that *some men believe women are inferior to men and should be controlled and obedient whenever their man feels like it. It's the same way a master views slaves. Quit being obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:58 AM
1

No, because I don't have the worldview of a man-child.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:52 AM
3

Obviously I didn't mean that literally, but men who think that way view and treat women like slaves. Every description of what it means for a women to submit involves the belief that men get to control women whenever they want and that women should just be obedient. Tyrant-subject is another metaphor you could use.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:58 PM
1

I am not, I didn't even know one existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:45 PM
3

Men are disgusting pigs who only want sex. See how that works?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:33 PM
0

Yeah, except the sexless goblins end up getting listened to. So when an actually well-intentioned man says he's looking for submissiveness, no one knows if he's a sexless goblin or a man who just wants to be respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:27 PM
3

There's a hell of a lot more to a relationship than the metrics going into sexual marketplace value. A man might make more money but a woman might be more physically attractive, she might be more charming, she might be a more attentive partner, she might be more proactive. There are plenty of things women can bring to the table beyond money, status, intelligence, etc. In a hypergamous relationship, men have higher stats on those metrics. THAT'S IT. Money, status, and intelligence don't define so…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:16 PM
4

A man isn't better than a woman because he's smarter than her or has more money than her or has more social status than her or is a better leader than her, etc. He's got higher value in the sexual marketplace AND THAT'S IT. Hypergamy doesn't make women inferior to their partners in terms of dignity or their value as human beings and it certainly doesn't mean women shouldn't have agency or their thoughts, opinions, and ideas valued in a relationship. Different doesn't mean unequal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:54 PM
1

I'm not well-versed enough in psychology/sociology/etc to go find a perfectly crafted study that supports my belief, but observations about the world, experience, archetypes, etc. ARE evidence, they're just not scientific or conclusive. Most things in life are like that. If we needed perfect evidence for every belief we had no one would believe anything and the concept of an opinion wouldn't exist because we'd have perfect proof about reality all of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:48 PM
2

Right, and the degree to which this is the case will be different for every couple. What I'm trying to say is that the overall trend will fall in line with what the average man is like vs what the average woman is like.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:41 PM
1

Because I accept men and women as they are on average? Because I respect who men and women are on average? If men on average have a need that women don't, I'm not going to advocate for relational dynamics that tell men and women to be anything other than what they are. If men and women deviate from the average, that's fine, but they're the exception not the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:37 PM
1

I was a military officer in a highly technical field. Most of my guys were smarter than me. I don't understand why this is such a hard concept to grasp, we're talking about masculine and female tendencies, not "the law of why all women must obey men at all times."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:33 PM
1

I don't have a perfect treatise or model for male/female sexual dynamics. No one does. Everything I'm saying has to do with the idea that men and women are different and have different tendencies, on average. There are many aspects of masculinity and femininity that can be embodied. No one embodies them in the same way or to the same extent. When you look at the whole of humanity, these tendencies and the embodiment of masc/fem show trends. Men, in general, need to be shown respect in different …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 06:25 PM
7

When a word becomes overloaded with different meanings and colloquialisms then the word becomes a problem. Submission's original definition is fine but no one knows whether it's actually being used correctly anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:26 PM
-2

This. People become leaders because their followers choose them and believe in them. Maybe that's a better way of putting it. Men want a partner who believes in them. If you believe in them, you'll defer to their judgement because you want to, not because you have to. Obviously this can't happen in every instance but when it happens often enough in a relationship, depending on the particular man and woman, a man will feel respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:26 PM
3

You're absolutely right about that, my ideas about leadership don't mean men shoulder all of the burdens alone. That's not what "submissive" is supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:22 PM
1

I think in this case when we're talking about masculine and feminine it comes down to observation. Men and women have different desires and tendencies and the expectations come from observing better outcomes in society when we work with those natural desires and tendencies rather than constantly resisting them. Like I said though, it's not a black and white implementation of rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:19 PM
-5

There's a time and a place for it and it manifests itself in different ways. It's not so much about needing someone to order you around or control you but actively deciding to follow and defer to his judgement in certain circumstances. That being said, I absolutely expect my partner to view me as an intellectual equal and value my desires and opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 05:15 PM
5

It's not the rigid, inflexible set of rules that a lot of the red pillers think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:42 PM
2

You're original reply to my comment literally said "how does a man know that?" you dolt. Apparently that's not in the cards according to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:34 PM
-3

It manifests itself differently depending on the personalities involved. I think it has more to do with most men needing a mission in life in a different way from most women. It's more of a general principle rather than a rigid structure that has a single, uniform implementation in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:32 PM
2

And the ones that do say no? AKA me? How do women actually prove that if you assume they're being manipulative by saying no?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:26 PM
3

I really don't understand what you're getting at? Waiting doesn't mean you're suppressed. I've done it. Didn't lose my virginity until my wedding night (now divorced, my ex misrepresented himself before we got married). It was ridiculously hard because my sexual desire isn't a bad thing but there are consequences I wanted to avoid by sharing that desire with the wrong man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:25 PM
4

If sex by the third date is mandatory then that answers why there aren't many women with low body counts. You can't have women who are selective with who they sleep with unless men are willing to wait. So you're creating the whole f'ing problem the red pills whine about. I don't put up with that and I say no. If sex is the cost of entry into a relationship then that's not a man who respects me. That's a pig. It's meant a lot of rejection but in the end it means whoever I do end up with will want…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:20 PM
3

No? I don't understand where you're getting that from my comment. A woman who is waiting for marriage is waiting for a man she can marry, and that doesn't necessarily mean the man is wealthy, conventionally attractive, socially adept, or anything of the sort. A woman who is extremely selective with who she sleeps with is usually only going to hold off on sex until the relationship feels safe and secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:17 PM
8

If you go to the online dating subreddit, you see a lot of posts about women being disappointed in how quickly conversations turn sexual before a first date. That almost never happens to me. Part of it is who I match with but also how I've presented myself on my profile and how I come across when I chat makes it clear that I'm not going to be the type to put up with disrespect. I don't put my sexuality at the forefront when dating so men can tell I have more to offer. My most frequent compliment…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:09 PM
63

I really wish we'd stop using the word submissive in all of these discussions about dating and marriage. Men with good intentions use the word to express their desire for respect in a relationship and for a woman to trust his leadership and guidance. Then you have the disgusting pigs who think submission means a woman who is okay with being a slave. If you don't want woman who is constantly opposed to the direction you want to go, say that. If you don't want a woman who is controlling, say that.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:37 PM
3

If you're the sort of traditional woman who is waiting for marriage then you've earned it by staying disciplined sexually and demonstrating a capacity for loyalty and fidelity. Women who don't wait can certainly be loyal and faithful but they won't be able to demonstrate those things up front in the same way a woman who is waiting can.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:24 PM
1

I have. They're as insufferable as they sound. You tend to hear more of them openly talk about watching "You" on Netflix nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:16 AM
1

I'm being a bit reductive there. Plenty of women who have read those books are wonderful but for them 50 shades is a guilty pleasure and they recognize that it's brain rot. They effectively admit this when they deny reading it. You've also got women who unabashedly read the books and don't see the issue with being fans of that kind of garbage. I think men are usually talking about that second category.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:52 PM
3

Um, yes they do? Do you have any idea how much novels like 1984 have formed society's views of authoritarian socialism (e.g. Soviet Communism, Maoism, etc)? A novel like 1984 isn't "true" because we really believe there is a literal country called Oceania where Big Brother is always watching. It's true because it shows us the reality of living in countries with similar ideologies and constant surveillance. You do realize literature studies continue past 8th grade right? There's more out there th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 10:09 PM
3

“Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.” -Neil Gaiman
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 09:40 PM
2

Sometimes I look at the dating market and think about how the worst men and women in it really do deserve each other. Then I look at some statistic or a comment like this and have to confront the sheer enormity of the problem...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:59 PM
2

Thank you for this, I lost the mental energy to continue dissecting the foundational principles of fiction after that last comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:39 PM
5

Those aren't tropes. "Enemies to lovers" is a trope.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:56 PM
11

Humor and the hero's journey. It doesn't necessarily always mean a deep, profound truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:32 PM
10

Good fiction tells the truth and can provide deep insight into the world and the human spirit. Anna Karenina, for example, tells a good deal of the truth about sexual dynamics. I wouldn't categorize 50 Shades of Grey as good fiction. It's pornographic fantasy written for vapid, shallow women. It's popularity does give some insight though. There are very real women who read these kinds of books and it shows what kinds of men those women desire. It also reveals to me the kinds of women a lot of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 05:13 PM
1

I mean, you can ask, and when the question is asked, the woman would look suspicious if she said no. So if you think it should be standard practice to ask, sure, go ahead. But be willing to deal with the consequences when the kid turns out to be yours and you have effectively accused a good woman of cheating. 9/10, there are signs that someone is cheating or the sort of person who would cheat. But everyone (men and women) is taught to make decisions based on lust and without any prudence. So the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:09 AM
–

Keep your chin up, it takes a long time to find a guy who genuinely values women. If you're honest with yourself about improving whatever areas you have control over, you'll find a guy who genuinely values what you bring to the table. Sorry you're going through this, I definitely know how you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:31 PM
–

The delusional red pillers have no idea how isolating and lonely it feels to be sexually conservative. You're surrounded by promiscuity being rewarded by men and then they have the gall to, at a minimum, be intellectually dishonest about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 02:22 PM
3

90% of the men who say they want a virgin/low n count woman don't deserve one, won't value one, and won't respect one. They pursue very sexually available women and then wonder why they keep ending up in terrible relationships (not that high n count makes you a bad person but presenting your body as the best thing you have to offer tends to not be a good sign).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:18 AM
–

I wouldn't say not being able to find a guy you're attracted to is being single by choice. Like yeah, I could start dating a guy who's morbidly obese but is that really actually an option women should be expected to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 11:56 AM
–

Women get this advice too. The point isn't to never admit you feel lonely or that you have to be the most confident man on the planet. It's about cultivating a positive mindset about yourself. I've been on both sides of that. I had a really negative, pessimistic view of myself and the world and thought I could only be happy in a relationship. When I let go of that idea, life got a lot better and I liked myself a lot more. Still single, life gets lonely sometimes, but my happiness doesn't depend …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 11:51 AM
2

unfortunately, you're very right about that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 01:48 AM
3

No, because the debate itself is stupid. It's not useful to pit women not being able to get abortions and men getting drafted or going to war against each other as issues. If the point of it is to get men to admit more money should be used to study women's bodies than war, you're wrong. Go find something else to take funding from. Warfare studies defend the country, abortion doesn't. The premise of who gets to claim victimhood is a tired power struggle that serves no one and I'm not going to sit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:26 AM
13

Not relevant but... Heaven help us if a draft becomes necessary. Used to be active duty, currently part time guard. We only want volunteers. Draftees would be a nightmare scenario. Ok, relevant point now. We've been fighting insurgents with inferior equipment for decades now, not a near peer military. If we did get into a conflict with a near peer, it would be a bloodbath. You'd see combat deaths on a level not seen since WWII. Secondly, all men are required to register for the draft. Not all wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 11:13 PM
4

There's two problems with the pills: 1) lack of accountability. If nothing's your fault and you don't understand that everyone has to deal with problems they didn't cause, you get to be resentful of whatever you perceive to be causing all of your problems. The resentment creates a damage radius that extends far beyond genuinely terrible men/women. The Me Too movement targeted all men instead of just the predators. It's not fair that there are men who sexually assault and harass women but that do…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:19 PM
-1

It's other women because some of us handle disagreements through some type of character assassination rather than confronting the behavior itself. It's the mark of emotionally immature women. I can disagree with the June Cleaver larping without attacking anyone's character. Someone's behavior would have to be pretty bad to start making judgements on that front.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:49 PM
5

You're like the only person who has actually answered the question I asked, thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:41 PM
1

Sure, wise, intelligent, and sociopathic. The witch of a woman it would take to do this is second only to a serial black widow.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:17 AM
2

So if I happen to do trivia while I drink wine (as in wheat wine) at a wheat winery, that's still just me drinking wine because I'm a stupid, vapid woman with no hobbies?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:11 AM
0

I don't buy that younger women are "more fun to be around" for older men and I don't buy that this assertion is anything but an excuse to overvalue youth in a woman's sexual attractiveness. Men spend thousands of hours of their lives watching porn in which youth is fetishized and then want to act like there's any legitimacy to the notion that they're looking for anything non-superficial by chasing after younger women. Just because they didn't know you'd date a nineteen-year old in the future doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:09 AM
0

Ok, sure, whatever you need to tell yourself. Don't care, I don't buy it. I wouldn't want physical contact with older men who prefer the company of nineteen year olds either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 11:39 PM
2

What I find really dumb about this assertion that younger women are "better" because of less emotional baggage is that baggage isn't the problem. If you're 19 with no relationship baggage but don't have the character to overcome life's hardships you're going to be a bad partner. A woman who doesn't take responsibility for her own healing at 32 probably wasn't the type to do so at 21. Men who try to rationalize chasing after significantly younger women just want the younger hotter body but since …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:57 PM
1

There's more mental health awareness in our generations. When you start becoming aware of these things you can't repress them anymore which makes them worse if you don't get help. It is also incredibly beneficial if you're willing to do the work. If you're doing it right it'll be a pretty grueling experience and requires you to take a lot of responsibility and accountability for yourself. Unfortunately a lot of our generation don't take responsibility for their negative thinking patterns and con…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:25 PM
6

Ok, then the question for you would be which women do you think "deserve" (can't think of a better word at the moment) to have 666 as a standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 11:53 AM
7

Right, but I want to know what is considered a good catch vs delusional in this context. Like when is being picky a personality flaw vs being justifiably selective?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 11:52 AM
1

I don't buy it. Like I can definitely agree there's a massive difference between receiving affirmation on social media as a woman and men watching porn but it doesn't make much sense to claim men's views of women don't change when they more frequently view women in porn for their own gratification rather than speaking with living, breathing women in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 04:32 PM
1

Right, I think it's more about who we say no to rather than trying to say yes to more people. I do think attraction is a bit more flexible than we're willing to admit but it takes a lot of self work and you gotta avoid filing your brain with garbage (constantly looking at insta models/influencers, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 08:34 PM
1

I agree with quite a bit about what you're saying but everyone is aligning themselves with the wrong men and women. We can't control what the opposite sex wants but we can control how we treat the opposite sex and who we give our attention to. Men and women need to stop rewarding garbage human beings for their bad behavior. It appalls me to hear how men get treated when they try to be vulnerable with a partner. Women are supposed to be nurturing and safe to be vulnerable with. But since men chas…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:28 PM
9

I think anyone can move the needle a bit on what they're attracted to physically. Like ideally I'd want a guy who's at least 5'6" but I've matched with a guy who's 5'3" before because I know I'd stop caring about that if we were compatible. I don't know that compromising on looks should even be put in the "standards" category. There's a baseline level of physical attraction that is a standard but a lot of it is really just "preferences." I also think porn has had the same effect on men that Inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:19 PM
2

I have an honest question: which trait(s) are we saying make it difficult for NT's to "deal with" autistic men? Or what sort of trait(s) are we saying autistic men who feel entitled to date NT's have (or anyone from the looks of this post)? With the diverse set of symptoms autism diagnoses can involve nowadays it's not a category I would think to exclude outright. I want to know what sort of behaviors we're talking about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 06:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter