| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tyson knows.I guess it depends on your definition of productive. For me, productive legislation is first and foremost representative of the will of the people. I think this can only be done effectively with a representative governing body. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 11:40 PM |
| 1 | Tyson knows.Ok: raise your kids to respect women and minorities and be a good example of that for those around you. It's going to take (almost) everyone doing that to rid our society of inequality. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 11:26 PM |
| 3 | Tyson knows.Are you saying that a more representative government isn't more productive than an all male government? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 11:25 PM |
| 2 | Tyson knows.When I think of the possible reasons for not having more women (and minorities) represented in government it seems to always come back to us not caring enough in aggregate. Possibilities: Women are worse at governing than men because they are inherently worse at governing. because they don't have the same opportunities as men. Women are just as good as men at governing but aren't represented because we don't trust them as much as men even though they are just as trustworthy. we just prefer men m… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Tyson knows.I personally don't think we should have some sort of EE for congressmen. I think the inequality reflects our overall values as a nation and until that changes, congress will remain the way it is. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 05:23 PM |
| 5 | Tyson knows.This is where assumptions about context play a critical role. If you strip all context then yes, you're left with "more women + less men = better." But in the context of addressing existing inequality the equation looks more like "representative amount of women + representative amount of men = better." If you don't factor in context then you're cherry picking and not addressing the actual arguments being put forth. ETA: So yes, with the applied context it does mean that there should be fewer men… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 03:47 PM |
| 16 | Tyson knows.the premise is that "more women = more stuff done" But she doesn't say that. She's at least as likely, if not more likely, to be saying that more representative government would be more productive. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 12:55 PM |
| 0 | Tyson knows.This sub is like incels-lite. Idk what happened. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 10:47 AM |
| 124 | Tyson knows.She didn't say everything, just half of our elected representatives (presumably to make them more representative of their constituents). Nice straw man though. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 10:44 AM |
| 5 | Tyson knows.bilnd | /r/PussyPassDenied | 04/08/17 10:40 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter