TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aquaventure Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by aquaventure on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, I think I may have read the study you mentioned, and think that an adult couple producing resources without any children would happily contribute more resources or take in an orphaned child, preserving it's genome, which is (presumably) propagating the homosexual couple's lineage as well. I know it's not entirely a lethal trait, but at such a low rate of direct transmission, without an evolutionary advantage, it should have been wiped out ages ago, no?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:09 AM
1

Yes, and it showed a very large difference in the numbers between gene linkage to xq28 than the newspaper article had, indicating that homosexuality is a polymorphic trait. You are aware that more than one gene - often many genes - can and will contribute to a phenotype, yes? To say that one gene linked to one trait is the causal factor is as incorrect in biology as saying "Correlation is causation" in statistics. Then can I discount your newspaper article? I do agree that the immunological resp…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:14 AM
1

Did you read the nice academic article that I linked? And no, I don't think I do, as I specified when we started this that I would only accept peer reviewed articles who's sources I can verify. Enjoy your concert!
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:58 PM
1

This is a newspaper, not a peer reviewed journal article or study. I can not look up references, papers the author has quoted, nor verify claims. I will not refute that there is a link between gene Xq28. What I am debating is that homosexuality is a polymorphic phenotype, created by a variety of interactions of various genes. Simply saying "because 40% of gay people have gene Xq28, gene Xq28 is the cause of homosexuality" is a very bad conclusion to draw. There are in fact many genes associated …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:51 PM
1

Oh, yes, and you mean "invivo" meaning "In life" "Invitro" means "outside of life" or more accurately, "in a test tube"
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:36 PM
1

I'm sure it does, what search term did you use?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:33 PM
1

Correct, convergent evolution did not give us two eyes and four limbs. However, these traits do very well for our species, and are not actively selected against. Homosexuality, by it's very definition, is a lethal trait. You have it, you do not pass your DNA on, end of story. For many animals to have adapted it, it must confer an evolutionary advantage to the species as a whole. What this may be is a result of a lot of debate, and I can link you to some great journal articles if you wish. Please…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:26 PM
0

I have searched for these terms, and have found no information outside of papers from the 1960's although if you would care to find a peer reviewed study or source, I would be happy to read it. If a trait occurs across multiple species, on multiple separated continents, it is generally called "convergent evolution" and there's generally an evolutionary basis for two otherwise unrelated species gaining the same genetic trait - it is selected for by the environment.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:13 PM
0

May I ask what journal you got that information from? Considering homosexuality is tightly conserved across multitudes of species requiring different temperatures during gestation, I very much doubt it.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:02 PM
4

Very interesting! If used right, this could eliminate random heat, radiation or chemical fluxes that occur as it is now, preventing damage to DNA at a critical point in development. This could lead to some very, very healthy babies!
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:50 AM
5

Considering the massive strain that an uncared for baby puts on the social system, i dont think it untoward that funds should be allocated to messengers that wake everyone of breeding age up with a beautiful flute rendition of Greig's 'morning' followed by a croissant and coffee and your selection of whatever birth control you like. It'd probably be cheaper. All joking aside, why isnt it being given away like candy? Ten times cheaper than the problems unwanted children from either sex create.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:05 PM
2

Yeah...I'm gay and would feel a lot more comfortable with a female prodding my junk for the same reason most straight guys want another guy to do it. Doubt it'll happen, but would be nice.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:16 AM
3

You asked which actresses portrayed men in a similar fashion to Danny devito, and I answered. Hardly derailing the conversation. To put it another way: how many short and fat males are there that are recognizable actors? Or who aren't sweet grandfatherly types? Not many.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:59 PM
1

Dame Judi dench? Admittedly, she just retired, but I found her to have a certain gravitas. Ethel mermen, perhaps?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:50 PM
3

I very much enjoyed the vendor's responses when I married my husband (gay). Wedding licenses in Saskatchewan must be obtained at a jewelry shop (no conflict of interest there). The attendent was desperately trying to pass off rings to us as the certificates were being 'printed' (uh-huh). In many instances the design of the ring was very clearly made for a female. She actually got in a huff when I told her in no uncertain terms that we were not interested in sparkly carbon attached to aurum.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:50 PM
1

Umm...I seem to recall an article about a Curves in B.C. that was allowed to deny a gentleman service. Oh, found a supplementary article about a guy in Quebec who is currently trying to sign up. It briefly mentions the cases in Saskatchewan and B.C. where a man was denied membership.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 09:35 AM
1

Yeah, I didn't get that bit of the article. She stated that the study took place in Montreal, where there were little consequences to being gay. So...when all other aspects of life are equal, gay males are happier? Not much of an argument....
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:13 AM
2

Uhh....all words are "made up" in that they are a phonetic sound associated with an image or concept in our central nervous system.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:04 PM
3

What exactly is the adoption/legal abandonment process then, if not forcing the state to pay for someone's children? Should this be abolished? Not trying to be an ass, but I'm genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:21 PM
10

Thank you. Yes, anyone in a position of such authority will most likely get young people with a crush on them. They're supposed to be mature enough to know this is not OK.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:52 PM
6

....you can consent to being assaulted. It's called 'sparring', we do it in my martial arts class all the time. There's a nice little form to fill out and everything.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 08:24 PM
2

...I think if you're trying to raise your children to accept or deny a political ideology (raise them 'non liberal??') then you've already failed the parenting game.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:37 PM
1

Seriously weird. I've had this from the other end - odd women who I don't know, apparently attached to my straight friends, texting me to ask "I Only have one question - is he good?" "Well, I've no idea who you are, or who 'he' is, but gauging from my tracklist this month, probably not. Why, did you want me to give you some tips?" They usually wind up being very peculiar conversations...
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:01 PM
2

Would've tried " Why are you talking to my children without my permission?!? Are you some kind of pedo??"
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:48 PM
3

Got mine as an aquapic attachment - run some listerine through there, and I've got extremely fresh breath all day....
/r/seduction30/06/12 07:58 PM
1

Yep. And maybe a decent lab that's semi observable to a visitor. But at least I'd be in a position to critique the PCR. Perfect troll, actually: "Kid's yours" "Oh yeah? Pretty sure I'm gay, why don't the both of us get in your 'lab' and double check, smartass? "
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:19 AM
6

I'm not sure. Electrophoresis requires some machines that don't like to be vibrating while running, or you'll ruin your bands. I think this is most likely a handy mobile 'fridge for samples?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:38 PM
3

Oh, true and I've had no problems with any of the above statements, when it's obvious it's between friends. However when it's from a jilted girl at a party five minutes into the conversation, it tends to ruffle my feathers a bit. Not enough to comment on, just enough to end the interaction and not actively engage with that individual the rest of the night. :)
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:10 PM
5

Equally annoying, I suspect is the "But you're too cute to be gay!" that I get occasionally.... I don't think it's nice to question someone else's evaluation of their sexual orientation. They've had a lifetime to experience whatever it may be!
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:15 PM
5

Actually, my boyfriend and I are getting married. Female friends of mine seem to be rather taken aback when I happily tell them I'm signing a prenup. "You should share Everything, no?" "Well, yes. He's sharing his wonderful home with me, and allowing me the opportunity to look for work in a comfortable environment which I would otherwise not be capable of supporting on my own. For this, I will quite happily ply my talents as a half-decent chef, an excellent home repair and rennovation guy and co…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:03 PM
19

Yeah....was arguing with some lady a few months earlier about that.. "The MR subreddit is discriminating towards women and gays, ect, ect" Me: "Actually they submit a lot of issues that are relevant to both me, and my straight male friends. There are a few idiots on there, but on the whole I've found it to be pretty welcoming. Lady: "Well, you're obviously the exception, other gay people feel threatened," Blah blah blah... Me: "Odd, I've never heard anyone say anything on the major gay subreddit…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:49 PM
2

I had a similar thought - why not make it so the parents both pay child support into a communal fund with a debit system that can be checked on by the mother, father and a lawyer or arbitrator. Kids shoes? No problem. $500 dollar purchase at an upscale adult clothing store? Uh, no.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:11 AM
1

Heh. My grandmother, oddly enough, taught me to spin and weave on a scottish harp loom. Oddly enough, the only reactions I've ever gotten (from kids at least) was along the lines of "That's neat!" or "Is that how they make shirts?" ("Sadly, not anymore dear.)
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:32 PM
2

Yeah, although a few of the nicer, and forward thinking firms switch that to "one person of your designation" and any children, although I think that mostly for the benefit of homosexual employees. Still, it's nice to be able to have the capacity to dictate whom gets the benefits, without the use of an archaic social ritual.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 03:27 AM
1

Actually I'm (Canadian) hoping to get married to my (Californian) boyfriend soon. His mother hesitantly suggested a prenup and found a delighted pair agreeing happily. Everything he/I earned before getting hitched should remain ours, and neither of us like our respective countries' division of assets. Of course since the both of use dislike children, and can never have any by accident, this simplifies things a lot...
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:19 PM
1

My post contained no emotion other than polite incredulity at the uninformed blanket statement. And no, from my experience the majority of gay men do not 'bend over backwards' for feminist causes. Approach one with the subject of men having the option to financially divest ones' self from a child, in much the same manner as the abortion or adoption options that females have, and you'll very likely find a very receptive audience. However, saying what a group does or does not to will certainly iso…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:13 AM
2

....I....beg your pardon? I'm gay, and I support the men's right's movement. It became very important to me after I found my brother's girlfriend tampering with his birth control. Regardless, I'm very much an egalitarian, and it doesn't take much to see that, in quite a few disturbing ways, things are not equal.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 02:31 PM
8

I agree that while things get out of hand, I think an add that promotes hitting a male while they silently take it perpetrates the viewpoint that it's ok to be hit by a female whilst the male shuts up about it. ...not that I don't agree with all of your points. I just think abuse crosses a line. I also don't think a healthy society would produce an add about a woman holding an icepack to her eye and apologizing about the shitty coffee, but we've been there too.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:14 PM
1

I'm sorry, but since you seem to be so decision based.... Why not simply let the child decide when they're older, and they can figure out if they want a body part cut off or not? I take as dim a view on this as I do mothers who pierce their two year old's ears for child beauty pagents.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 07:09 PM
2

While this forum is a great resource on the topic, it's existence tends to attract men who've been greatly hurt by some of these issues, and tend to post comments that might not be viewed as a good representation of the goals of the rest in this subreddit. Which isn't to say the others don't have equally valid points. I just think that it's a contributing factor.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:42 PM
2

I did get a chuckle out of "pushed, hit and slapped" as well as "Forced me to do something sexual". .....They never asked me if I didn't like these things.....
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:08 AM
1

I would also present the addendum that paternity tests be performed without the knowledge of the mother; I imagine quite a few males would be put off by the reaction their partner might have (justified or not) when she learned he didn't trust her. A quick mouth swab or hair sample can be obtained quite discreetly, without upsetting the infant.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 02:54 AM
1

I completely disagree with the study when they say that lesbians never abuse their children, and agree that the sample size is ridiculously small. But, I think they probably would have a lower instance of abuse. Of course, I would think that of any gay or straight couple that planned to have children, as opposed to an accidental birth. In the case of homosexual relationships, the rate of planned children is quite often higher, as that's the only way that couple can reproduce, barring trysts with…
/r/MensRights17/11/10 02:43 AM
2

I'm gay myself, and I heard about some guy being assulted outside of the only bar in town. He was straight, somewhat willowy by all accounts, but didn't lisp or behave abnormally. I felt really bad when I heard that. From a broader perspective, I suppose a lot of straight males have been inhibited by homophobia, but not directly. I often wonder how many guys are out there that could be making a lot more money, and be a lot happier as a dancer, chef, or other profession that they would excel at, …
/r/MensRights17/11/10 01:58 AM
5

Wow. I just assumed in these pay gap surveys that they'd account for profession and training. An engineer working at CERN is going to get paid more than an english major, unless he or she turns out a bestseller. I just thought they would've accounted for that in statistics.
/r/MensRights10/11/10 10:13 PM
1

I'm not sure. What I got from the article is that she realized the importance of single fathers, although I agree she does seem to present the case in a rather unequal fashion of Time with mum = nessecary, time with dad = potentially optional. Someone mentioned something about men becoming violent? Did I miss a comment, or were things edited?
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:19 PM
3

In a Strictly genetic sense men are individually disposable, and collectively crucial for the development of a species. We're essentially 'guards' against bad genes. By eliminating an X-chomasome and replacing it with a Y, which (normally) only contains genetic information for "maleness", a lot of gene masks are removed. A gene mask is a genetic trait, that by virtue of it's existance mitigates or eliminates the negative effect of another gene that is not benefical to the species. When these mas…
/r/MensRights02/11/10 08:35 PM
1

Oh, it most likely is. I just lied because she wouldn't drop the subject. But no, she thought it should be illegal for males to do that.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 06:47 PM
1

I tend to let them slap me once, and give them a warning. If they continue, I'll catch their arm, pull it out flat and hit a very painful nerve in the inner arm with my knuckle. "Oh my god, you hit me! I'm calling the police!" I just point to the reddened mark on my face and say "Prove it".
/r/MensRights31/10/10 07:10 AM
2

Thank you! I very much appreciated your post. You seem like a very ethical person.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 06:45 AM
2

"You first."
/r/MensRights31/10/10 05:56 AM
1

Thank you. While I very much enjoy this subreddit, I often find the comments here....generalized in an unflattering manner. I suppose all we can do is simply point out the inconcsistensies in statistics and laws and hope the cognitive dissonance will get more people on our side. In a gentle, friendly manner.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 05:55 AM
1

Holy crap, your username took me back to when I was seven. Thanks man!
/r/MensRights31/10/10 05:50 AM
2

Actually, I was in a car with a friend of mine (extremely baby crazy). And she mentioned that if Vince and I (Gay) wanted a kid, she'd be willing to donate an egg. I thought for a moment (She wanted semen from me, and mentioned so on many occasions) and told her that Vince and I weren't interested in children, and told her (Lying) that it would be inconvenient, as my father had paid for semen storage and a vasectomy for me when I was fourteen, and it's a pain to get sperm out of storage. Her res…
/r/MensRights31/10/10 05:47 AM
-1

(S)/He who controls science controls the universe? Or the babies at least.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 05:44 AM
1

mmm...normally these women make that statement at the start of the relationship though. Truely open people will not be constrained, and will make sure any potential partners are fine with what their desires are.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 01:27 AM
1

Well....she is correct in that in a truely patriarchal system, women would not be free to do such things. I don't think that they are in such a system anymore.
/r/MensRights17/10/10 08:02 PM
1

Hmm...depends on how willing she is? I've not read all the literature seddit has to offer, but my brother's a pretty big fan, and often tells me of what he's read and observed personally, so using that (And if any real sedditor wants to correct me on a bad opening/ect please do!) Anyways, in a best case scenario, try to find some broadly amusing jokes. Find out her sense of humour, save up a few and make her really laugh at the bar. Some passing psych student mentioned that smiles and laughter a…
/r/seduction11/10/10 06:30 PM
1

I've never used any such system before, but I'm certain there are websites out there that allow groups to keep track of each other. Perhaps you might find, and then plug the best of those?
/r/seduction11/10/10 05:51 PM
2

I believe a lot of literature on seddit indicates that females are interested in a male that has already been successfully coupled. Kind of a "ooh, that looks good! I'll have what she's having!" mentality.
/r/seduction11/10/10 05:40 PM
7

Beats me! Happens now and again with some girls, but unlike your friend, I gently disengage them and tell them my boyfriend would not approve of their behaviour. Seems to sink in. Maybe there's an underground culture of straight dudes that take advantage of this? :) Edit: actually, I do recall a straight guy who worked at the gay bar as a bartender. I found this a bit curious, so I asked him why. His response was that a great deal of girls go there all dressed up with the idea that 'men won't hi…
/r/seduction11/10/10 04:31 AM
3

In a different post, he affirmed that he'd be willing to undergo any ceremony she wished, and stay with her for 40-60 years or so until one, the other, or both are wormfood. He's not concerned with committment, he's concerned what will happen if either of them no longer want that relationship. And there is no such thing as forever, in regards to humans. Either death, termination or separation has ended 100% of all human relationships since the beginning of time.
/r/MensRights15/09/10 12:09 AM
1

Dude, you don't have to be in a comitted relationship and be in love. My boyfriend and I (hah, yes, relative to the article you linked) are engaged, and neither of us mind a little side action - with the caveat that the third party involved knows that either of us are in a relationship. It's a bit rare, but if you are single again, why not just find a wife with the same easygoing nature? It's because I love my boyfriend so much that I trust him. Him and I = making love. Him/me/her/some guy eithe…
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:38 PM
4

Well man....I don't condone what you did, but your son was missing, and no one with any information would have anything to do with you. I'd just say you did what you had to do in order to ascertain that your child was safe. What parent wouldn't break the law to do that?
/r/MensRights14/09/10 05:29 PM
4

Indeed! I quite enjoy being flrted with by females, even if I'm not interested sexually. I find it a refreshing compliment from out of the blue when it happens.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 01:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter