TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arcsector2 Archive

View 1 posts and 35 comments by arcsector2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Discussionarcsector2/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 08:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Thank you for the insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:11 PM
78

Good bot
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 07:27 AM
18

Needs to be "#thebestawomancanget"
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:21 AM
1

Gave my friend man titties haha
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:27 PM
10

Because he's joking ye daft cunt
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:25 PM
1

/r/technicallythetruth
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/18 01:22 PM
35

Woman hits man: "woman beating" What
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 02:58 PM
11

If you have 50% custody you should only have to pay 50% as you're taking the direct support role.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 08:47 PM
0

It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace. For through the Spirit we eagerly …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:52 PM
1

Did you just happen to skip over verse 6???? I referenced it up above... Paul states clearly that you cannot be saved through acts like circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:44 PM
0

What? You're talking in circles, but i think you're agreeing with me?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:08 PM
1

Lol bruh you're just taking things out of context. Of course there's an argument to be made against circumcision, but Galations 5 is not it. Take Galations 5:6, where he explains what he means in 5:2; For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love. He means to say that you cant be saved just through acts; you gotta have that faith. This may be beyond my purview to say, but i think personally that a bet…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:29 PM
1

Can I just go back? Can I go back to not knowing anything? Boy have you even seen the matrix? That's literally the point of TRP. It's why it was called that!
/r/TheRedPill22/06/18 05:09 PM
-7

Double down. "If you weren't looking for a hookup, then you wouldnt be talking to me right now." Alternatively as a push: "If you are having doubts before even meeting me, maybe you aren't the right girl for me."
/r/askTRP04/06/18 02:55 PM
3

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:50 AM
-1

You're missing the point; male sexual strategy is amoral socially. And TRP hasn't "moralized" female sexual strategy, society has, and they're just rolling with the punches.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:17 AM
1

Good bot
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 08:06 PM
1

I checkout a new branch every day before committing anything... is that a bad thing? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:03 PM
1

most women I know work just as often as their Male counterparts Until they want to have babies. Men provide financial stability as well as an emotional rock to the woman, and they provide a backbone on which the children can be raised. Studies have shown that children who are raised fatherless tend to be more prone to violence. I'll find the study if you really need me to, but it should be apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 02:10 AM
1

If objective morality doesn't matter to you, then why have laws? To put it another way: If you don't want someone to torture you because they find it morally acceptable, you should care about objective morality. The only case in which you wouldn't care about objective morality would be if you were a true nihilist, in which case, you shouldn't care about this conversation since it has no meaning. Which brings us back to the fact that atheism has a shitty moral compas, in that it has none at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:20 PM
1

Alright, well turns out you can't prove that God doesn't exist either, so then we're at an impasse. The fact is that within their respective worldviews, christianity has a better case for objective morality than Atheism, which is what i'm assuming you're arguing since this is reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 07:16 PM
1

Remember that one time when I said "if you set aside proving God exists"? I'm saying within the context of the Christian worldview. I seriously said this like 3 comments up. Debating the existence of God is not at all within the scope of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 04:57 PM
1

Alright; i'll give you one more chance, because I can tell you haven't done any actual research into this problem: If I claim that the almighty, all-powerful creator of the universe is the center of morality, it almost certainly isn't the same thing as one of it's creation telling me that they are the same. I dont know where you came to that conclusion, or if you're actually serious, you gotta do some more research. I'd love it if you could provide me with arguments instead of hearsay as to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 07:46 PM
1

Give me another worldview that's as inscrutable as christianity when it comes to moral objectivity. Christianity has a God from which all morality stems from, which if you set aside proving god exists, is a super air tight moral solution. So give me an alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 10:28 AM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 04:08 AM
1

Not exactly. There are three types of love on the Christian worldview: Agape, Philos, and Eros. Agape is selfless love, and on the Christian worldview everyone should treat each other with this kind of love, from a wife to a stranger. Philos is a companionship type love, a love born out of mutual interest and experience together. This can only be between a friend and another friend (wife or brother would count as a friend). The last one is Eros. Eros is physical love. You can guess what that ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 03:30 AM
1

I think that it hasn't because up until the challenge to Christianity, there wasn't any need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 12:26 AM
1

Objective means true for all people at all times, and the Christian worldview has the most solid backbone for an objective moral system, thus it has to be objective. If you're referring to the fact that Christian's are "biased," I would argue that assignment of bias is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/18 12:25 AM
2

It's weird to see that no one has an objective answer in this thread. At least on the Christian worldview you know that the reason is because sex is sacred between a wife and her husband, where conversation is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/18 10:21 PM
1

But the argument i'm making is that they're explicitly designed to not give men a chance if they don't want to get divorced, or if the woman is abusive, or a whole host of other situations. The laws are unfair because they explicitly cater to one gender regardless of circumstance. Sorry if I'm not making legal sense; I have personal history with the damage these laws do to men, so i tend to get a bit emotional when discussing them, but i'm tryna keep a level head.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 06:44 PM
1

The issue is courts don't take into account the fact that the man may have not wanted the children in the first place, and there's even cases of women getting their husband to pay support for a child that isn't there's, or women using the support funds inappropriately. Thus the laws are unfair, because unfair acts have been perpetrated under the laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 09:47 AM
1

The issue with Nietzsche is you kinda have to cherry pick more than usual what to extrapolate.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:59 AM
1

Your note about the longevity you have going with the gym makes this whole post's context much clearer to me.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/18 06:53 PM
5

A bunch of old Asian ladies sit in the spa every day from around 6-7 pm. One time when I came in to do my swimming exercises, they told me to stop making a ruckus because "This is not public place." I already understand that; I'm paying the same as you to go here and to use this pool.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:13 PM
3

You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter