TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arequipapi Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by arequipapi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There are tons of deadbeat parents in the world, don't kid yourself. Both mothers and fathers abandon their families for multitudes of reasons. I do believe the child support system is abused and very biased against men, but believing people will instinctively do the right thing if not forced to is laughably naive.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 10:33 PM
2

It's an outlier in favor of the man if you look at it by %. Dude isn't sacrificing any financial stability because of this
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:36 AM
6

I actually agree with you. You DONT need that mich to raise a child. But this pennies to him. And way lower than the average by % of income. The IMPORTANT parts are not what are being discussed here. Custody rights, parental involvement in upbringing, etc. Everyone in these comments just see $$$ and write off what is important for the child. Maybe he also got 50/50 custody and full parental rights? The money is to ensure he can live life he's used to. We don't know. This sub is outraged about th…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:10 AM
6

Honestly all of this is a pointless conversation without looking at the other terms. What does he get for visitation/custody? How is the relationship between him and his son? We don't know any of this and these things affect the terms a lot. This is a classic case of OP cherry picking a few facts and making a mountain out of a molehill. Again, men's rights should focus on men who are genuinely getting fucked by the system. This guy got one of the better settlements you can get
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:54 AM
1

I guess I kind of draw the line there. At the end if the day the child is the victim of any parental dispute. It's not "usurious" to demand that the child's needs be taken care of regardless of the outcome of the parents' relationship. We, in this sub know there are many, many, far too many cases where this concept is abused. But almost always the child I these circumstances is the only innocent party. I hate how courts routinely rule against men almost by default. But the concept of child suppo…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:41 AM
3

We weren't. I was airing grievances with this sub. Countless threads overwhelmingly devolove into limiting women's rights as opposed to expanding our own. All I'm saying is this is a pretty fair settlement. But people in this sub seem to object to men conceding ANYTHING even if it's actually pretty reasonable Wrt the OP, it was actually a pretty reasonable settlement and yet it got posted here like it was some kind of injustice
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:31 AM
3

This is my whole point. This is the men's rights sub, is it not? This dude is not representative of us regular guys. Imo his settlement is fair. Now let's fight for fair settlements for everyone. My fear is much of this sub has lost the grasp on what is fair. Many men here want to deny women rights while expanding their own. I'm here to meet in the middle and this settlement seems to do that imo. 7% is fair giving the fact that he's been a part of the child's life for so long and is also very we…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 01:21 AM
4

I'm a dick because you can't read?
/r/MensRights07/01/24 12:48 AM
1

I agree. And based on this post we don't know the details. There are better things to talk about in a men's rights sub. Someone making almost half a million per month paying pennies on the dollar in child support is not one of them. Let's discuss the tens of thousands of men who are denied visitation or custody while having to pay half their modest wages in child support, while their ex is free to date and even marry mich richer men. THAT is a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights07/01/24 12:46 AM
7

I was responding to a comment that said they would only get 10%. 32,500/10 = 3,250. Sorry I left off the 50 bucks for brevity. Check your math or reading comprehension. Or both
/r/MensRights07/01/24 12:33 AM
-14

Edit: Read past the first paragraph before downvoting. Tl;Dr There are men who are genuinely fucked by the system. This man isn't one of them. Let's fight for the regular Joe's like us who don't have this man's resources. OP: I won't argue that a child needs 33k a month. But this child grew up wealthy for 12 years and shouldn't be held responsible for their parents decisions either. What do you propose? Put mother and father back to poverty wages? Punish the innocent kid who just wants mommy and…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 12:18 AM
-7

I get that. I'm just saying this isn't a case a men's rights movement should focus on. He got off better than most men do. I know men who pay upwars of 50% of their income in child support and live in a studio apartment with minimal visitation rights. This is not that. I don't know the details of this case, but on the surface it doesn't seem like anything too crazy. 12 year old boy. Mother and father have been engaged for 6 years. Father makes a shit ton of money. Kid has probably been accustome…
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:53 PM
7

In any case of domestic violence, it's crucial for the victim to document everything, seek legal advice, and get support from professionals like therapists. Using official channels for communication and legal proceedings is also advisable. Yes. As a victim of domestic abuse from a woman partner myself, I 100% agree. Which is why I gave you that exact same advice. Regarding the images created, they are purely illustrative and not meant to represent real events or diminish the seriousness of situa…
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:44 PM
61

Even then, what's a kid going to do with $3200/month? That's more than a lot of adults make. And his dad has been in his life for 12 years. This doesn't mention anything about custody rights and when the kid is 18 he'll probably reap all the rewards of his father's wealth and influence as an NBA coach
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:35 PM
15

So about 7% of his already ridiculously high salary? Pretty fair by my estimation... people who make far less make much bigger CS payments by % of income. Focus on these cases. This isn't a case of opt-out rights. They were engaged for 6 years and the kid is 12. Child support is appropriate here
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:30 PM
5

Lol, if you actually looked like this stupid fake image, they would do something. Nobody is posing for a glamour shot in their luxury vehicle after apparently barely surviving a bobcat attack. Now, if what description says actually happened to you. Document everything, including your injuries. Get a lawyer and file a civil suit. Also, seek comfot from a therapist and/or male friends. Put her in your rear view mirror and only interact with her through official channels (ie: a lawyer). And don't o…
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:14 PM
6

You have to remember these "AI" models are not really AI. They look through a dataset and basically use predictive text to so figure out the next word in the sentence. This a symptom, not the real problem. I don't believe there is any bias programmed into Bing AI. This is just the general sentiment the world has and Bing AI is regurgitating it. Which is actually a scarier problem imo
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:50 AM
9

Uncircumcised dude here. I'm 37 and have had dozens if sexual partners. Only 1 girl ever even made a comment about it and even she didn't mind. She just had questions about it because it was the first natural one she'd seen. You just unlucky with a couple dumb chicks in a row. The attitude towards circumcision in America is changing for the better. All my friends who have had kids in the last 10ish years have declined to have the operation performed on their sons. Thankfully, it's a dying trend
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:35 PM
4

OPs claims are just as dubious and unknowable as the claims against Brand. The only thing a logical person can do at this point is wait for evidence to be presented. Blindly defending Brand at this point is just as stupid as blindly believing all women. If you're on the side if justice you'll be patient and wait. Bit, that's not most of this sub. It's all this sub is going to talk about for weeks, I'm sure. And no one will have a scrap of evidence to back themselves up either way. The only opini…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 09:15 PM
2

I know everyone here is mostly bitter and wants you to go nuclear on her. I'll give you my experience. It's not gospel, just my experience. I got divorced after only a year and a half of marriage as well. Also when I was young, only 23. We likewise owned nothing of value together. Hell, her car was still registered under her maiden name. Just talk to her first. You're young, she knows you don't have much. Appeal to her human side and just divy up the belongings fairly. In my case, we kept anythi…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:26 AM
5

You know if it was the wife that disappeared on an overworked husband we'd all be saying she's the one cheating. It's not that far-fetched. And the dude is seriously a bum. They don't even have kids yet. I wouldn't want to be with a woman who refuses to work if there are no kids either. But he's been unemployed for years and let's his pregnant wife overwork herself. I don't get how you guys are mad about this lol
/r/MensRights16/08/23 08:28 AM
4

You said it more tactfully than I did. Good job. Agree 100%
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:59 AM
-4

I'm not trolling, I genuinely don't understand your problem. You're just hung up and bitter about the fact women didn't like you when you were unattractive. You notice it now because you're attractive and you've lived both lives. This isn't a men's rights issue. This is a YOU issue. It is well-documented that attractive people are treated better. Men and women alike. Not just in romance, but in perceived trustworthiness, in getting promoted at work, in making platonic friends, etc, etc. I'm not …
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:57 AM
-8

Jesus Christ. You went from unattractive to attractive and now you're mad that you missed out when you were younger? That's no one's fault but your own. You need therapy. And no, more Joe Rogan episodes don't replace actual therapy. Did you try dating fat and ugly women when you were fat and ugly? Probably not. Would you now? I'm guessing no. What's the difference? Congrats on getting your shit together physically. Now hit the mental gym and talk to a therapist about your unhealthy thoughts
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:34 AM
-5

That reads like it's the name of the course you mentioned in the previous sentence. Normally when people cite a book name it is in quotes and/or includes the name of the author. My b
/r/MensRights14/07/23 03:58 AM
-4

You imply it in your title Extreme feminism, some say, is just on the fringes, and those who say otherwise 'don't know feminism.' But Radical and Marxist Feminism are explicitly taught in courses on feminist legal thought. emphasis mine You say it's not on the fringes, but then also say it's taught in a class specifically about this topic. That's pretty fringe/niche. That's like being shocked they teach specific classes about sexual deviancy for people studying clinical psychology. So what's the…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 03:44 AM
-5

I'm cracking up at OP acting like this is some kind of compulsory or required general education course. People taking a class called "Intro to Feminist Jurisprudence" are likely already on the extreme/fringe edges of feminism and are taking this class because they want to. Or people majoring in a specific discipline of philosophy/political science/gender studies/even pre-law, etc. As you said, studying these topics as an academic is perfectly normal and relevant for some people. If this became a…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 02:16 AM
3

I've been married (now divorced). You don't have to lose that dream of finding "the one." I've found it again, but this time we're like-minded on the topic of marriage. Our commitment to each other doesn't need the "blessing" of a government title. We keep our finances separate, we have separate homes, and share the desire to travel and remain child free. You don't have to martyr yourself into lifelong singledom
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:13 PM
0

They didn't encourage lying or any illegal actions or things that would harm others They enourage men to lie allll the tiiiiime. Lying about age, income, sexual past, anything to keep "spinning plates" (unless you consider men protecting themselves from divorce rape harm to women, which shockingly many people do) This is more of an MRA thing. That's why I am here, but not in TRP. TRP is just as bad as FDS or that Diabla sub. I'm interested in men's rights, not manipulating women into bed. The hi…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:24 PM
0

I don't think you know what gaslighting is... TRP is and has always been about improving yourself and Oh wait maybe you do. Because you have been gaslit I to believing this...
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter