TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ares_god_not_sign Archive

View 1 post and 70 comments by ares_god_not_sign on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Blogs/Videoares_god_not_sign/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That sucks. Sorry you had to go through that.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 08:08 PM
2

No, I try not to support sexism and witch hunting.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:01 PM
5

And people are allowed to believe the Earth is flat, too.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:43 PM
3

Then you haven't facilitated this program in line with Draw The Line's guidelines. This poster's correct response is literally "Tell your teammate that their behaviour is not welcomed." Being accused of a crime is not welcomed. It's listed in the same category as a poster asking "Your peer mentor sends you nudes of a girl you know. Do you share them?"
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:35 PM
23

Some discussion about this incorrect graph. The other interesting point is that they change the size of their little man across the graph (taller on the left) to make it appear like even fewer rapists are jailed.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:45 PM
1

This is Important! link to whitehouse.gov petition Pick one.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:48 PM
3

Check out the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. They're more focused on free speech than men's rights, but they're your best resource for standing up to asinine "safe space" actions by your university.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:46 PM
23

Ms. Parkeesian?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:35 AM
10

I see it occasionally mentioned that it'd be nice to have access to male birth control.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:52 PM
56

true equality is as good as achieved Friendly suggestion to caveat this statement with "in the Western world". There are plenty of countries in the Middle East and Africa that have very legitimate problems with women's rights.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:06 PM
0

the harassment women experience if others know they are female Are you suggesting they shouldn't experience harassment after they've informed others that they're female?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:56 PM
1

Was he one of the many people banned for "doxxing" Zoe Quinn by revealing her real name?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:40 PM
9

That's not quite right: the user was already shadowbanned before the post, and the AMA mods manually approved the post after he made it because they thought it was a good question. SRD thread about it.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 10:37 PM
2

Go watch The Music Man. The 1962 film version was on Netflix last I saw. It's a great musical.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:21 PM
18

Pick a little, talk a little, pick a little, talk a little cheep, cheep, cheep, talk a lot, pick a little more... It applies to some women today just as well as it did in 1957.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:00 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunk of the people here have had blood drawn by a woman's fingernails. I know I have. Sure, it was stupid high school shit, but I worry that my future son might end up in jail for stupid high school shit because he responds proportionately when assaulted.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:11 PM
5

And like I said before, there are times when "feely buzzwords" are the appropriate description for a group regardless of other time those words have been misused.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:34 PM
7

If you want to discuss the validity of labeling SRS as a hate group, I'd recommend opening with your criticisms rather than trying to dismiss every label of "hate group" outright.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:12 PM
9

Okay. Just expect to be called out on it when your assumption is incorrect, like here.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:00 PM
17

Nazis and hate groups exist even though those labels are most often used as hyperbole. SRS is literally a group of people whose organizational purpose is to hate.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:23 PM
5

men have no prejudices against them Prejudice = prejudice + power, shitlord. Of course men can't have prejudices against them.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:10 PM
55

Well, maybe they exist, but they're not "true" feminists. No "true" feminist would say those things.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 08:27 PM
1

Yet you offer no alternative for legal action against them. Copyright infringement? Then again, as an SRSister, you're inherently irrational and illogical, so I probably shouldn't even waste my time talking with you! Cheers!
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:25 PM
1

They would not have been charged for just having the photos if they kept it to themselves - which was what the girls wanted and basically consented to. The are being charged because they were dickheads and shared it around the whole school - the photos have very likely gone online. The boys were not charged for sending the pictures of themselves either. That's where I got that from. You think what's wrong is the sharing of the photos and nothing else. And the boys are being charged as pedos, whi…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:20 PM
2

So you'd be okay with pedophiles soliciting children to produce and send them child pornography so long as the pedophiles didn't share that child pornography with anyone else? That's where you draw your line‽
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:30 PM
2

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. Those who do remember the past are condemned to watch as all those fucking morons running our countries repeat it.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:17 PM
4

Note that you can use Uneddit to restore all of /u/asoiaflover's posts. He/She seems to be the only one saying that it was rape, but damn are they trying hard to prove their point.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:43 PM
5

In my experience, yes. You have to really fuck up to get "fired" from the military, and waiting for shitty service members to PCS is way easier than trying to do anything official about their behavior.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:22 PM
10

I was told to wait her out because she was leaving in a year. Well, that's DOD policy for dealing with bad superior officers. I'm pretty sure gender issues weren't a factor.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:53 PM
6

It comes down to the response of the main body of the movement to these outliers. I think MRAs are generally good at objecting to anti-transsexual sentiments. Christians are generally good at voicing their disdain for WBC. I think Muslims do an okay job of opposing terror done in the name of their religion. But I don't think feminists do enough to reject misandry by people who call themselves feminists. Because of that, they open themselves up to hyperbolic attacks like feminism as about hating …
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:33 PM
2

That's exactly what it is. You're being ignorant and dismissive. I don't think you understood what I wrote. This is not how to have this discussion, by the way. How about you raise specific points so I can address them?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:05 PM
7

No, that's more of the "no true scottish feminist" crap. Christians have a problem with the Westboro Baptist Church, Muslims have a problem with radical Muslims using terror as a weapon, and feminists have a problem with women who hate men and call themselves feminists. I guarantee that there are multiple contributors to these hate sites who call themselves feminists, and you're a fool if you think otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:30 PM
4

No, the poster implies that someone, somewhere, would see this poster and realize that they shouldn't have sex with someone who doesn't consent. That prior to seeing this poster, some person would think "This woman said no? Oh well. I'll just force her to have sex with me since that's an okay thing to do! I've never been exposed to the concept that having sex with someone without consent is rape, so I'll just go ahead and threaten to kill this nice lady if she doesn't let me violate her."
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:41 PM
6

So what you're saying is that you're just a run-of-the-mill MRA? /s
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:16 PM
14

The poster also implies that there are people who accidentally rape women, and whose behavior will change by reading platitudes about consent.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:16 PM
12

As long as you're consistent, you're allowed your opinion. Are you also okay with "Don't be that Muslim" posters?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:59 PM
4

You could always go find a cult.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:21 PM
11

Yeah! The only reason anyone would oppose the death penalty is because they hate women, and this disgusting subreddit is full of sickos whose deep hatred for everything female results in their vocal opposition to the potential for executing innocent people. Why, if it wasn't for the fact that I actually enjoy being outraged at how I imagine I'm being oppressed, I would quit reddit right here and now!
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:49 PM
4

I'm downvoting you mostly because of your lack of punctuation and capitalization, poor spelling and grammar, and the "DX" emoticon.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:14 PM
13

Which parts of the sidebar do you have questions about? (I assume you have read the sidebar completely, since it would be rude to ask your question without doing a little bit of work to answer the question yourself)
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:44 AM
1

Fuck, I haven't seen someone on reddit with as big an ego as yours since I've been here.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:09 AM
1

You're being an asshole. There's plenty of room for debate and discussion with people in /r/MensRights who aren't. You're just not worth the time of anyone here.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:43 PM
3

The effect is somewhat ruined though by that fact that I'm not a defensive, presumptuous ass. Huh. Could've fooled me.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:56 PM
15

He has a penis. Worse yet, he was born with it.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:34 PM
6

Really? I always thought that was just a bunch of people who thought it was funny to piss off feminists and SRS. Or similar to spacedicks, where the only purpose is to offend. I think conspiracy is much less likely.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:26 AM
14

Imagine those assholes were being as assholish as they could possibly be. Something completely beyond the scope of a regular asshole. Like, hypothetically, saying that you raped your own child. Then imagine that those assholes actually had the power to send you to jail and take your son away from you, no evidence required. Surely a scenario as absurd as that would warrant some self-doubt from fathers who are unsure if they wanted to be around a large number of those assholes?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:27 PM
20

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:23 PM
5

Everyone expected that.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 10:05 PM
2

Good gravy!
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:49 PM
5

If I had my druthers, I'd change it to A: Definitely not just “being against the Illuminati.”
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:23 PM
2

Ah, so if he thinks he was raped, he was, regardless of what he was indicating to his partner? The concept of sending mixed messages, as others in this thread are discussing, is just victim blaming and therefore you can write off the entire argument? It's a complex issue, and you're an arrogant asshole if you think the only reason someone would disagree with you was that they didn't "get it".
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:50 PM
4

People can "get it" without reaching the same conclusions.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:37 PM
9

How is this a post about trolls?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:33 PM
1

I thought you were leaving! Well, if you haven't gathered, I have no respect for you or your idiocy. You don't even know why seatbelts are mandatory (protip: it's not to protect the feelings of people you crash into), so I don't see any hope for finding common ground upon which to explain why it would be beneficial to society if paternity tests were mandatory. Your arguments have all begun with some form of "you don't know what you're talking about, but I do because I'm basically the shit and he…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 10:04 PM
0

I wish I could use smaller words to tell you this: you are being downvoted because you are horrible at making a case for your unpopular opinion. Eloquently and clearly making a good case for an unpopular opinion gets plenty of upvotes, as do mediocre arguments for popular opinions. But you have not made your case. Nobody in their right mind would be convinced by your arguments. Congratulations on being one of today's lucky 10,000. People won't necessarily read all of a thread, and points you mak…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:13 PM
1

Please understand that your debating style is like a conspiracy theorist: every post is like starting anew - almost completely unrelated to the previous ones, and as near as I can tell you have absolutely zero understanding of my replies - either because you're not reading them or you're just thick. This is frustrating for me, and probably why you're being downvoted. Every time I provide a complete counter against your argument, you change your argument. We've gone from "paternity testing is mis…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:41 PM
3

... so, you have to work at it, I see. What exactly about the rate of incidence causes something to be mandatory? Why are seatbelts mandatory if less than a fraction of a percent of all car rides end in an accident? A prenup is a statement that you and your spouse are human adults, therefore you're neither perfect nor are you going to take unnecessary risks for a meaningless gesture of "trust". "Not getting divorced" has fuck-all to do with being trustworthy.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:49 PM
1

Hot damn. Were you born this stupid, or do you have to work at it? Your argument is that mandatory DNA screening somehow would mean that husbands don't trust their wives, I point out how prenups are a similar protection but are not about mistrust, you say something so stupid in response that I don't want to waste my time replying, and you're claiming victory. That about sum it up?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:19 PM
6

Business audits are done because of the assumption that employees may be stealing. That is exactly why they are done. No they aren't. Clear and apparent auditing decreases the chance that employees will steal. That is why they are done. You don't audit because you distrust your employees, you audit to decrease the chance you'll be taken advantage of. I'm not even going to touch your second paragraph. You're obviously not married, nor close enough to anyone where you seriously considered marriage…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:00 PM
15

That's like saying that a business's regular internal audits operate on the assumption that employees may be stealing, or that a prenuptial agreement has the assumption that you'll end up getting divorced. You can trust someone without having to make yourself unnecessarily vulnerable.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:45 PM
0

It took you a whole week to come up with that retort?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:24 PM
23

So if it didn't happen "all the time", if instead it only happened a few times, that'd be okay?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:09 PM
12

Yeah, /r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:36 PM
1

Really? I interpreted that as "All rapists were babies at some point, so why not instill values in your little shit factory so he won't grow up to be one."
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:54 PM
2

A lesson I learned early in my reddit experience was that mentioning your education or intelligence makes you seem like an asshole. I'm actually a rather big fan of IQ as a measure of intelligence, to the point where I tried to learn enough to contribute to the wikipeida articles about it. Fuck, that was hard. There's a lot of very good, believable, and conflicting stuff out there. My post was trying to acknowledging the challenges of quantifying intelligence in a way that can be widely agreed u…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 01:04 AM
2

Gould makes a good case for multiple types of intelligence. Go to the wikipeida article for information overload, and dive into the citations for even more. Your experience in college was identical to mine. I actually spent a few years as a misogynist and made the same arguments that the article mentions. However, I've since matures into a misanthropist. The college population you and I experienced suffers from a selection bias. Women have different goals than men: men are driven to be caretaker…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 12:58 AM
9

There's hardly a consensus on what "intelligence" is, so to claim that one group of people has a higher intelligence than another has a large uphill battle. One that this article fails to climb. If you use that crazy scientific method thingy, men and women have the same* mean score on tests that claim to measure intelligence. Men have a higher standard deviation, meaning there are more very intelligent and very stupid men. *there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean intelligence of t…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 12:23 AM
39

That looks like a fine place to be banned from, although I can't imagine wandering into there in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 04:22 AM
19

I vote creepy. Just man up and talk to the girl!
/r/seduction04/09/10 11:17 PM
8

The inverse of 108% is 92.59%, which you should round to 93 cents.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter