TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

argv_minus_one Archive

View 0 posts and 588 comments by argv_minus_one on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

While I don't doubt that, the downvotes I'm getting are ample evidence that she is indicative of the majority of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:54 AM
1

That is not an excuse for hating them all. They can hate their abusers, and they can hate their oppressors, but to hate all women is just sick. I've been subscribed to MR for something like a year, by the way. I didn't just come in here.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:50 AM
-1

Actually, it's an attempt to get you to fuck off and stop polluting my inbox.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:48 PM
-4

It has become clear that I cannot convince you of anything. If you're willing to practice such disgusting hatred of women, there is nothing I can do to change your mind. Therefore, I leave you to wallow in your hate, and hope you never succeed in harming anyone with it.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:22 PM
-3

Yeah, you've clearly got issues. I'm done with you and this subreddit. Have a terrible day.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:13 PM
-3

If you actually agree with the Taliban's atrocious behavior, then you're either a raging misogynistic scumbag or you haven't been paying attention to what they've been doing. Either way, people like you disgust me. I just unsubscribed in said disgust.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:00 PM
-1

Go look at the Taliban, then. They're doing it right now.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 06:46 PM
-1

The current human population is descended from twice as many women as men. DNA analysis has proven this. Citation needed. feminist revisionist history and whitewashing Citations needed. Plural and credible. I do not believe for a microsecond that there is some massive feminist conspiracy to rewrite the history books. They don't have that much power. You've got a lot of convincing to do if you want me to believe something that crazy. You know, I at least have plenty of incontrovertible proof of m…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 06:44 PM
-4

What abuse? Are you fucking serious?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 06:06 PM
-1

What makes you think that at any time in recorded history that men's issues were being dealt with adequately? I said "perhaps". Many of the things that existed pre-feminism such as the expectation and enforcement of male servitude and disposability were prominent for the overwhelming majority of men in recorded history. They were also prominent for the overwhelming majority of women in recorded history. Slavery is not sexist; it oppresses everyone. How many women do you think did the dangerous w…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 05:36 PM
-2

The female teacher he co-teaches with agrees with him, for what it's worth.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:49 PM
-4

Pretty sure Susan B. Anthony wasn't using the Internet for her suffrage movement.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:47 PM
6

Which would be fine if the other sex's issues are already being dealt with adequately. When feminism first came into being, perhaps they were. Today, unfortunately, they are not.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:45 PM
2

Was there actually a point in doing this, seeing as how all of Reddit is going to go down shortly for the same reason?
/r/MensRights18/01/12 11:46 AM
5

Bitch is crazy.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 10:53 AM
2

I appear to have gone full derp there. Thanks. Fixed.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:43 AM
1

Considering how angry people are, I'm not sure the "compliant" part is working very well…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:58 AM
2

nonviolent rape ಠ_ಠ The only way to nonviolently rape someone is when they're intoxicated out of their minds or unconscious. Nafissatou Diallo, to my knowledge, was neither.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:57 AM
9

When someone you love becomes a men's rights activist, I recommend you continue loving them, and lend thoughtful consideration to their concerns. If your relationship is civil and respectful, let it remain so.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:52 AM
4

And that sick bastard got off on it. That's fucking horrible. He belongs in a mental institution, not on the streets with a weapon.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 04:37 AM
2

No, no they will not.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 03:31 AM
8

Everyone considering circumcision should be forced to watch such a video, with their heads clamped and eyes pinned open if necessary.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:56 PM
5

I have no advice, but I'd like to agree with you that this woman's concerns are all 100% grade-A hogwash. She is, by virtue of having the stupidity and gullibility to believe such nonsense, unfit to raise children. Would that the courts realized this…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:52 PM
3

He said he would "react violently" (does not necessarily involve beating to death) if he were intoxicated and deceived into sleeping with a transwoman. This is roughly equivalent to having sex with an intoxicated woman when she ordinarily would not. As you may recall, this is considered rape by most feminists, and not one of them would bat an eyelash at a woman violently attacking someone that raped her. AnnArchist's statement is therefore completely justified, and you are a misandristic pig. Ga…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:54 AM
0

What the hell happened to her in that picture?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:45 AM
-6

If /r/MensRights makes you angry, and it's not because of all the atrocities being documented here, you are a sexist fuckjob and do not deserve to live.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:41 AM
3

Not relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 10:11 PM
5

I prefer fluorescent rage, personally. Energy efficiency FTW.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:00 AM
2

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but you know what would stop me from committing suicide? Intelligently challenging the beliefs I hold that led me to want to commit suicide. Prove me wrong, and you'll stop me in my tracks. Unfortunately for me, most people are not philosophers…
/r/MensRights23/12/11 11:23 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights23/12/11 11:12 PM
4

I do. No one has ever managed to change my mind about the nature of life as a giant orgy of misery and pain. Most people are too stupid and complacent to even think about it, much less give my view a serious challenge. I very much wish someone would…
/r/MensRights23/12/11 09:15 AM
5

Empty platitudes are not going to change anyone's mind.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 08:42 AM
2

I'm surprised you lasted this long before being disappointed in your peers. Most humans are scum.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 01:29 AM
1

That's not an excuse. If she has yet to learn to contain herself and respect you, she needs to grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:44 PM
0

And? People are also prohibited from putting certain, arbitrarily chosen substances ("drugs") into their bodies. Nobody owns their own body in this sick country, man or otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:05 AM
14

Then I suggest you find a girlfriend that acts like a woman instead of a teenage girl.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:26 AM
4

Not sure if troll or brainwashed
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:04 PM
5

I find it improbable to think that payments couldn't be made through a child's whole life. If so, don't stick your dick in anything but a fleshlight. So, women are free to fuck as they please, but men are expected to be forever alone unless they're fully prepared to ruin their lives by making brats? Women may have sex for pleasure, but men may not? Are you seeing the double standard here?
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:43 AM
1

Much worse things than that have happened "at some point in history". What's important is whether this is at all commonplace.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:35 AM
6

So telling people they should dump their marriage and kids as soon as it gets tough has lead to the precipitous drop in long term relationships our society faces. That's quite an assertion you're making there. I trust you've conducted a massive study on the subject, with a sample size in the tens of thousands or more, controlling for factors such as abusive husbands, lower legal and social barriers to divorce, and marriages formed under pressure due to e.g. unexpected pregnancy? In what respecte…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:35 PM
14

I'm a man, asshole. Just because fulfillment isn't often attainable doesn't mean it shouldn't be, nor that lack of fulfillment isn't a problem. Just because your current job is unfulfilling doesn't mean that every job is unfulfilling, nor that you cannot hope to find a job that is fulfilling. Indeed, if your job is unfulfilling, I suggest you reevaluate your choice of career path.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:27 PM
23

The problem, really, is not that women can do this, but that men can't. Fulfillment should be available to everyone.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:38 AM
10

Oddly, the rest of the article seems to make no attempt at diminishing the horrible experiences of the two men she accused. Humiliating and degrading examinations, etc.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:38 AM
2

What part of "on four separate occasions" do you not understand? Also, why did this guy not stop looking when he noticed a young girl getting undressed? He must have stared rather intently for anyone to catch him at it. Why is it this guy's responsibility at all? It should be the girl's to keep her blinds shut. If she's consistently changing in a place where any passersby can see, there's something wrong with her, not with the people who see her naked. I mean, 12 years old and she's never been t…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 12:36 PM
-9

Well, that's one way to perform a circumcision…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:04 PM
-10

If a man discovered his wife cheating on him and killed her for it, I suspect many of you would approve. This raises the question: is penis cutting worse than murder?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:00 PM
-5

If guys only think with their penises philosoraptor.jpg Was she trying to decapitate him?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 10:58 PM
-5

…at a 12 year old girl changing clothes. On four separate occasions. Sorry, but I'm not crying over this sick fuck's imminent incarceration.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 10:54 PM
3

At no point did I suggest I respect women that do not deserve my respect, which I do not. You, however, do not appear to respect women ever. 'Course, with slurs like "mangina" being thrown around, you don't seem to respect men that much either.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:57 PM
3

Respecting women makes me a coward in your sick mind? How nice. I don't even want to know what kind of mommy issues you must have.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:46 PM
1

Trololololol lololol lololol hohohohoho!
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:58 PM
1

Racial slurs. Classy. Any other ways you feel like disgracing the cause of Men's Rights today?
/r/MensRights03/12/11 01:37 PM
2

I use it for trolls, actually.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 01:24 PM
3

You think you're my superior now? That's cute.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 01:23 PM
2

My point exactly. Misogyny will only convince people that the other side is right. That's why feminists have any power to begin with. Gender equality is a much more defensible (not to mention morally good) position.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:52 PM
3

Haven't we been over this already? Troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:51 PM
2

Not only will that not work (it'll just attract more of them), it is contrary to the notion of gender equality and no better than feminism.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:40 AM
2

For the most part, I agree with the sentiment of Men's Rights. But then I see blatantly misogynistic fucks like you, and for a moment I feel like the feminists are right.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:39 AM
2

They see you trollin'…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:30 AM
1

Pot, kettle, black. Go away and troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:15 AM
1

Pot, kettle, black. Go away and troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:40 AM
-1

Nice try, troll.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:27 AM
1

They see you trollin'…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:25 AM
3

They see you trollin'…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:23 AM
1

Lol, you think women are slaves to their husbands? Enjoy being forever alone, jackass.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:32 AM
2

I am a horrible, horrible person for laughing at those.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:27 AM
1

A libel suit will do the man no good if he's getting assraped in prison for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:23 AM
-2

Would you say you look fabulous?
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:13 AM
1

What are said dependent women doing, then?
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:51 AM
0

Right, and dependency implies not doing anything.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:40 AM
6

To do what? Breed? What a pointless waste of life. Stay-in-the-kitchen women are a massive turn-off to me. It's like they're suppressing their own personhood in favor of servitude to someone else. If I wanted to date an automaton, I'd get a Realdoll.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:55 AM
0

Just because a school teaches something doesn't mean the students aren't going to disregard it when reality demonstrates otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:54 AM
3

Um, being independent is the exact opposite of "won't do anything".
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:51 AM
0

Love? Companionship? Additional income? Furniture-destroying sex? Pocket medic in Team Fortress 2? Use your imagination. Women and men, being fully functional human beings, are both capable of quite a lot. Shackling people with traditional gender roles is an insult to the intelligence, adaptability, and creativity that defines humankind.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:49 AM
4

Cops that are both misandristic and corrupt. That's just great.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 12:23 PM
1

I smell a troll.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:33 AM
4

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:31 AM
2

Pussy pass? Women can get away with a lot of shit, true, but cold-blooded murder?
/r/MensRights02/12/11 11:31 AM
3

Wonder what that drug he claims they injected him with was. Odd that it would be that fast-acting, and how the hell would a bunch of Zimbabwean cultists get ahold of it anyway?
/r/MensRights28/11/11 09:58 AM
1

Then I am grateful that your view is not shared by Congress or the Supreme Court. If it were, the American people would be suffering a great deal more than they already are.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:01 PM
1

That depends on who you ask. Some people are not without pity.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:59 PM
1

Further legislation would be needed to make that roll-back happen.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:32 PM
0

But if I cannot find adequate support from charity, do I have I right to use the government to steal from you to prolong my life? It is arguably a natural right for anyone to do anything necessary to survive. It doesn't matter. You're a fool if you believe that your survival instinct would not compel you to do that or anything else necessary to survive. What you seem to not understand is that there is no legal basis for the state to provide social support for the disadvantaged. We will have that…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:30 PM
1

First item: The Congress shall have power To … provide for the … general Welfare of the United States The United States effectively is its people. Therefore this sentence could be interpreted as meaning that the government is authorized to provide for their welfare, including financially. According to the Wikipedia article on the subject, the Supreme Court has interpreted the meaning of "general welfare" as being up to Congress. And I believe Congress has made its decision.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:29 PM
1

I didn't say they did. I said that it's already illegal. What good is there in further legislation to stop something that is already illegal?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:23 PM
0

So, if you should find yourself unable to find gainful employment, as is increasingly likely in today's ruined economy, you would be perfectly fine with starving to death on the street? Or do you, in your unending arrogance, believe that you will never find yourself in this situation?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:17 PM
0

Doing that is already illegal. Child abuse, specifically. That's what Child Protective Services is for.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:15 PM
0

Where in the Constitution is the set of "Constitutionally authorized functions" defined, again?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:13 PM
1

If you think child support and welfare are typically enough to raise a child comfortably, you have clearly never attempted to raise any children, and are talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:10 PM
0

Are you trying to suggest that the government lacks the Constitutional authority to collect taxes?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:09 PM
1

Most women tend not to stick with weak men While I suppose that's probably true, you seem to be forgetting that everyone's definition of "weak" is different, often drastically so. Most men who take women's name in marriage are weak men. Or maybe they're respectful, or maybe they want to distance themselves from their families, or maybe they love their wives that much, or… …no, it must be weakness. Surely any self-respecting male of the species would never part with his surname, even though every…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:07 PM
1

The side effects include a lot of people choosing not to have children they can't take care of. A society that does not subsidize failure so extensively would be better than what we have today. Nonsense. As you know, child support payments are proportional to the income of the non-custodial parent. Most such non-custodial parents, being non-rich, yield very little child support money. Welfare, similarly, yields very little. Having children is not a feasible way to get rich. The amount of money c…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:00 PM
1

Then you are a merciless sociopath.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:56 PM
1

I'm 210 and solid muscle. Sure you are, and I'm the president of Russia.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:46 PM
1

The side effects of your "solution" include lots of people starving as a result of unemployment or disability. Is that really the society you want to create?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:09 PM
1

If there are signs saying you can't take pictures, you can't take fucking pictures. If you don't like the rules of the establishment, take your business elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:08 PM
1

groovymonkey makes a fine point. I must remember it.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:03 PM
1

If by "misandry" you mean "stupidity"…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:55 PM
5

People can argue promiscuity is wrong, but they do so from a position of aesthetics which makes it difficult to ascribe a label of wrong in any objective sense. Agreed. Promiscuity without condoms is indeed unwise, but only because (at least from a financial standpoint) of the child support system that is currently in place. If the system were not there - if people were responsible for their own decisions - women wouldn't be so cavalier about having children they couldn't afford. If they couldn'…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:54 PM
2

So, let me get this straight—you're making an assessment of their chances of divorce based solely on their choice of surname? You're out of your damn mind.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:47 PM
1

I've pondered this thought myself. What better way to distance myself from my thoroughly unpleasant father than to rid myself of his name?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:46 PM
5

I disagree completely. Posting general, non-men's-rights-related stories of women doing bad things detracts from the purpose of this subreddit, which is to draw attention to men's rights in particular. That belongs in another subreddit, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:29 PM
9

Not sure if troll… …or parody of trolls.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:21 PM
1

In my /r/MensRights?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:19 PM
1

And you thought the United States was a scary place for men…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:18 PM
5

Out of jail? So? She posted bail. Means she's not a flight risk. Whoop-dee-fucking-doo. If she gets acquitted or gets an atrociously lenient sentence or something, then we'll have something to talk about. Yay child molestation and bestiality, but "out of jail" is blatant sensationalism.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:15 PM
23

Promiscuity is arguably also wrong. Promiscuity without condoms is just mind-bendingly stupid.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:10 PM
1

Women will always have more options than we will, it's just how nature works. By that logic, medicine is futile, because dying at 40 of easily treatable diseases is also "just how nature works." there are plenty of decent guys like myself who know that women are our equals. You just insulted your wife a couple of posts ago and now you're claiming that women are your equals? Make up your damn mind! Your kind will never be a loss to any female, lol. If anything they'd be relieved that they no long…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:05 PM
1

You do realize you've just insulted your wife by implying that she's a weakling, yes?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:03 PM
2

If this girl is at a "natural disadvantage", it isn't visually or statistically apparent. If you're going to make accusations, back them up with facts.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:54 PM
2

I can't say I blame them for being afraid of her. She looks rather badass.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:52 PM
2

Okay, so she pleaded not guilty. Whoop-dee-fucking-doo. Without a verdict, there's nothing to talk about. "Innocent until proven guilty" applies to women accused of genital mutilation too.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:50 PM
4

Well, it's quite hard, at any rate. Why more people don't just refuse to have children is beyond me.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:55 PM
11

MRAs surprised: 0
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:47 PM
1

If even one person's grammar is improved as a result, it will have been a worthy effort!
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:55 PM
2

So, let me get this straight—feminists have as much power as they do because they have a zombie army?? Sweet monkey Christ on a pogo stick, we're doomed.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 10:36 AM
1

Then he's shallow and/or dumb. His prerogative, though, I suppose.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:49 AM
2

What's wrong with it is that I very much doubt the old man is entirely aware of her intentions. No doubt she's woven some fairy tale of love and adoration in order to keep the stupid old bastard wrapped around her finger.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:32 PM
1

Lack of children is a problem? What the hell is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:31 PM
-1

My point was that the rape is done with physical force. Things like drunken sex and sex with teenagers being called "rape" dilutes the term.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:13 PM
2

Teenage girls are not women; they are girls. They are way too young to be getting married, as is anyone else below age 25 or so. A 51-year-old man marrying a 16-year-old girl stinks of gold digging on her part and wanting a pretty piece of meat on his part. If they aren't separated in 10 years, I'll be amazed. Would I actually try to stop them from marrying? Probably not—I'm not qualified to make that kind of decision for someone else. But would I disapprove? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:57 PM
-2

It's called hypergamy. Maybe you should learn about it and all of the evidence associated with it such as the fact that women are after guys that are their social and economic betters. I.e. marry up. Guys at the bottom rung of society aren't "up," by the way. Irrelevant. Lack of gender imbalance in the population means there are not enough rich men for all women to "marry up". Your implied assumption that all women are immature and shallow enough to chase after money is rather insulting to women…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:47 PM
1

Voting is almost meaningless when all of the candidates I can vote for are crooked.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:08 PM
-1

Rape is visceral and traumatic. It is closer to murder than theft. Murder, I suspect, often is about power. The discussion you linked to only seems to get interesting if the definition of "rape" is twisted to include things like date rape and statutory rape. I am not talking about that. I am talking about real, full-blown rape—grabbing somebody off the street, holding a gun to their head, and having one's way with them.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:03 PM
1

Why do you think that rape happens most in impoverished, inner-city areas, committed mostly by impoverished men? Same as why so many other crimes are committed in that environment: because they blend in. They're one faceless body in a gigantic herd of impoverished, violent people, all of whom look the same to an outside observer. They live in an urban jungle that even hardened cops are reluctant to patrol. If you're going to commit a crime, rape or otherwise, that's the place to do it. Those men…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 09:50 PM
-2

They fail to take into account all the ways that people can derive sexual gratification. The exercise of dominance and the infliction of pain can be just as sexual to some people as more conventional activities. That doesn't change the fact that rapists are sick fucks on a power trip. They feel the need, despite the enormous risks, to rape an unwilling victim, rather than have kinky sex with a willing partner. Also, it is just as possible for rape to be merely sex in the absence of empathy. If s…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:38 PM
-5

there is still power left with the people I don't believe you. Prove it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:32 PM
3

Then why do they decry "slut-shaming"?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:07 PM
1

What makes you so sure that women are the source of this influence? I was under the impression that it was coming from crusty, old, male Republican politicians.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:07 PM
-1

I don't care what the lawyers and politicians and feminists think rape is. I'm talking about genuine rape—dragging someone into the bushes, pointing a gun at their heads, and violently having one's way with them. Is that done for sexual gratification?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:46 PM
2

How?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:43 PM
-9

You cannot change US policy. You do not have the billions of dollars needed to bribe US politicians into changing their minds. Give up.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:42 PM
0

In the US, the way to get a holder of political office to change policies is to bribe them.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 04:40 PM
-7

Why would someone rape, if not for power? What would be the point otherwise?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:04 PM
12

Is it really that hard to understand that some people sell sex willingly?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:03 PM
-5

Petitions accomplish nothing. Stop polluting Reddit with this useless crap.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:39 PM
1

Tit for tat, if you'll pardon the pun. Nothing unfair happening here. Move along.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:28 PM
-2

Not a men's rights issue. If the pedophiles "ephebophiles" think they deserve more rights than they currently have, they can whine about it in their own damn subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:21 PM
2

Of course they are. A large part of the deterrent value of imprisonment is the fear of being raped and beaten by other inmates.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:10 PM
2

What if the "victim" wanted his dick in the babysitter?
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:20 AM
2

And men, including young boys, are not children? Is that why they keep getting sentenced to prison and sex-offender registration for things they did at the ripe old age of 13?
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:19 AM
3

That's not much of a distinction. 14 year olds and 12 year olds are both hilariously immature.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:18 AM
2

A learner's permit means you are fit to drive a motor vehicle with adult supervision.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:15 AM
0

How exactly is it deviant if, as you claim, all of them do it? That would seem to me to be the exact opposite of deviant.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:14 AM
0

Were the girls in question 20 years old?
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:11 AM
0

…in Iran. Connecticut is not in Iran.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:09 AM
-9

I disagree. Two people being involved spreads out the load between those two people, but the load is still there.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 04:39 AM
-2

Not only should such a term apply to women, it should apply only to women, because women have the choices (abortion, adoption, etc).
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:33 PM
1

The problem is that having children is mutually exclusive with productivity. If you have them, some portion of your time and energy will be devoted to raising them. Productive people become unproductive as a result of procreating.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:03 PM
-14

The silver lining is that the childfree are being rewarded for their decision. This is good, even if the gender discrimination isn't.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 02:59 AM
-6

I have no siblings, thank $DEITY. My genetic line dies with me.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:33 AM
1

Enjoy missing one of the pivotal life experiences. I will, thanks. Life is hard enough without having wailing, shitting brats to clean up after. Earth is polluted and overpopulated enough without said brats polluting and overpopulating it further. While having children is technically "pivotal" in a sense, it is certainly not a good thing. I'm not sure how you've convinced yourself that it is, but I urge you to ignore your lizard-brain reproductive instincts and think rationally about the subject…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:32 AM
1

True, but darkamir felt the need to propagate said issue of political ideology by posting it here. Why?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:23 AM
-6

"The court serves the patriarchy!" Come on, you know better than to think that would be of any help.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:38 AM
-4

Even if he got a full-blown trial and was acquitted, feminists would still call him a rapist.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:30 AM
-10

Article has way too much ranting and not nearly enough focus on the substance. Difficult to read.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:08 AM
-5

Not having kids—being able to live your own life without regard for the incessant demands of any sniveling, filthy brats—is a punishment? Are you mad?!
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:07 AM
-10

Why did you feel the need to make this an issue of political ideology?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:56 AM
-4

You do have to feed them, though.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:59 PM
-1

$0, based on the fact that if you're willing to breed, you should be prepared to take full responsibility, by yourself, for the results. If you're not, don't Goddamn breed.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 01:59 PM
-8

No person greedy enough to steal $17,000 per month is going to use the money for any constructive purpose.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:27 AM
-5

usually the man is forced out by the woman and the woman ignores the child while pampering herself with all the child support money she's receiving. FTFY If the father has full custody, then the wife pays him support. Citations needed: The probability of a father in the US or Canada receiving full custody of his children is at least 50%. The probability of a father in the US or Canada receiving child support for children he has full custody of is at least 50%. I very much doubt that either impli…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:16 AM
-7

Let me get this straight—they mean to imprison him until he pays up, even though there is no way for him to make anywhere near $17k/mo in prison? A de facto life sentence for child support? Insanity!
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:05 AM
-8

A pity she didn't succeed in killing herself. If she had, she would not have to face the trivial judgment of people like you.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 03:15 AM
-2

The point I'd like to make is that this child was allegedly traumatized already. He was not going to lead an even remotely normal or enjoyable life after that. No amount of drugs or therapy can reverse the damage done by being molested by one's father.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 02:42 AM
-5

You shouldn't present that as the only way out, because it's not. It's the only way out that actually works. Other measures numb the pain of living a little, but that's all. I don't personally find life to be hell. There have been times I have, sure, but in general looking at my life, I wouldn't say it is. How can that be? How can you not consider life to be hell, knowing what it is and what it involves? you personally don't have the right to decide for someone else whether or not their "bad thi…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:33 PM
-6

But he can consent to continue living? He does understand the gravity of doing so—the abuse, the death threats, the pain of losing his mother (who presumably would have committed suicide anyway), and everyone around him trying to stop him from killing himself when that is the only way to end his suffering? I don't think so. Life is hell, and don't you dare try to claim otherwise. Life is what requires informed consent.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:29 PM
1

The kid's life was allegedly a hell of sexual abuse and death threats. In all likelihood, he wasn't going to enjoy much of anything ever again as a result. By your own model, death was easily the correct choice.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:06 PM
1

We don't know if her son gave her permission to kill him. What if he did?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:03 PM
1

Clearly you have never been raped before.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:02 PM
0

A pity she didn't succeed in killing herself. If she had, she would not have to face the trivial judgment of people like you.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:59 PM
0

It is never right to kill a child, no matter what your logic is behind it. Spoken like a true pro-lifer. All children deserve the chance to grow up and explore the world for their own. No. None of them do. Humans are not special. Even if they did, the fact that they've been abused means they have already been denied that chance. They don't choose to be born, or where, or how, or to whom. That is part of what makes life so objectionable. I was never asked if I wanted to exist; I simply do. And I …
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:57 PM
1

What about fathers who lose custody of their children to abusive mothers? They "allow" such a thing to happen to their children, because they are threatened with incarceration if they try to prevent it. That doesn't make them abusers themselves.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:53 PM
1

And if she could not protect him? What's sick is that you think living in that hell is better than death.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 02:51 PM
-17

If her defense argument—that her son's life was a hell of sexual abuse and death threats—is true, then she was, in my opinion, right to kill him. Nobody should have to grow up with that. That said, I'm having a hard time believing that. She's a millionaire. She presumably had the resources to keep dangerous men away from her son. Why would she let them abuse him in the first place?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:52 AM
1

People surprised: 0
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:41 AM
0

Namely the message that he is a subversive and should be disciplined. Really, you think the misandrists are going to just suddenly stop hating men because one of said men said something?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:04 AM
-1

ll0ll0ll0 angry! ll0ll0ll0 stomp!!
/r/MensRights22/07/11 07:24 PM
1

I'm not sure why she considered political correctness relevant to her sex life, but the wrongful assumptions of who hates who are at least understandable. I'm glad to hear this woman has since learned otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 02:16 PM
-5

Intelligence has everything to do with it. Intelligent women can see douchebags for what they are and avoid them. I suppose I should say "intelligent, mature women". Even a fairly sharp teenage girl is still going to be awash in hormones and not that good at picking men yet. As she grows up, however, she will learn what douchebags are and why to avoid them. As to your assertion that the majority of women are attracted to "alpha males", well, so what? You don't need to be attractive to the majori…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:36 AM
-1

Women with that behavior pattern are stupid. Stupid women are not attractive. If anything, the world is unfair to them, not me.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 09:27 PM
2

In this case it is less desirable to pick the nice guy becaue he is really filling the same role as one of her girlfriends. In that case, the correct answer is to pick neither of them. A woman doesnt conciously choose to be attracted to someone That may be, but she can and should consciously choose not to be attracted to someone (namely the douchebag).
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:44 PM
3

Which means she didn't see through that and keep in mind what a douchebag he is. She failed to learn from all the other women that wind up in relationships with douchebags, and why it is undesirable for her to find herself in the same position. Therefore, she is shallow and dumb.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:38 PM
9

Thirty min­utes later, Susan was ignor­ing me and was “all over” Peter. There's a red flag right there: evidence that this woman is shallow and dumb.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:25 PM
0

Your comment is incoherent.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:39 PM
-1

Hillbillies with pop-guns do not stand a snowball's chance in hell against tanks, napalm, stealth bombers, or nukes. The Second Amendment is a placebo. The arms you bear are useless.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:41 PM
0

Few in human history have ever been worthy to use authority properly and beneficially. This is not a new problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:39 PM
0

You are a lot easier to break than they are.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:38 PM
-2

Right, and that will only work if they think they can minimize the probability of being branded a criminal and punished. If everyone gets punished inevitably anyway, they have nothing to lose and therefore nothing to fear. If you want to coerce a population into doing something against its will, you do not want it to have nothing to lose by refusing.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:37 PM
0

Right, and that will only work if they think they can minimize the probability of being branded a criminal and punished. If everyone gets punished inevitably anyway, they have nothing to lose and therefore nothing to fear.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:36 PM
-1

We only have enemies because those fools in the CIA and elsewhere decided to poke their noses in the business of foreign countries, which in turn only happened because of their irrational terror at Communism and their equally irrational lust for nuclear power regardless of the unpleasant attention one gets by having it. And nobody's going to wage a war of aggression against the United States. Besides the obvious military stupidity of invading such a large country, it is too far away from the wor…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:30 PM
2

My point is, at this rate, they will be affected.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:21 PM
4

Angry people without power are not a threat to calm people with power. Killing a bunch of random underlings is not going to harm their plans in the slightest. If anything, it'll help them. Look at things like TSA, USA-PATRIOT, warrantless wiretapping, etc., and what excuses were used to justify them. Angry people with homemade bombs are "domestic terrorists" and will be used as poster children for implementing more of that fascism. Even if the people of the United States were to actually organiz…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:33 AM
2

By using electrical power, you are supporting wind plants that don't pollute the air FTFY and nuclear plants that melt down and irradiate the entire country (ask Japan how that's working out for them). lol anti-nuke paranoia By remaining under the protective aegis of the US military simply by virtue of geographic location, you fully endorse the method by which your security has been ensured. lol protective aegis If I need saving, it's from those goons. By accepting this brick through your window…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:26 AM
1

Don't give me that horseradish. Each soldier signed up for that campaign by joining the military. Whether or not they control the specifics of said campaign, they agreed to be part of it. Whether or not the military makes the decision to go to war is irrelevant. They are the jackbooted thugs that make it possible. No military, no war. That is what I hate them for.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:41 AM
1

Invaded by who? Aliens?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:36 AM
4

Of course not. The students there are meat. The government wants them to die for their country, not change it.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:33 AM
-1

Bonus points if you get a M-M-M-M-M-M-MONSTER KILLKILLKILLKILLKILLKILL
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:30 AM
2

If they wanted to be there, they would not have been drafted.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:29 AM
-3

People are paranoid about a new "unique person identifier" being issued. Big Brother issues. SSNs are used because they already exist, are trustworthy, and are unique.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:29 AM
-2

It's not this country you'd be dying for. It's the obscenely rich oligarchs that have taken it over.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:28 AM
2

You mean to tell me that forcing me into a military I want nothing to do with would somehow make me not hate their campaigns of murder and plundering? I would think that being forced to participate in those campaigns would make me hate them more.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:26 AM
1

No, that would be too obvious. You have to have most of the populace be non-criminal or they'll start seeing through it.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:24 AM
5

Have you been sleeping?! The government has been waging wars non-stop for a decade now. They may as well have a big clock somewhere counting down until they run out of willing IED fodder and start drafting us poor slobs to step on the mines instead.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:23 AM
5

Which you can't do because of common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:17 PM
-1

May they remain so until and unless they grow up.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:15 AM
13

I'm not fond of them, either. Not sure what that has to do with this, though.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:14 AM
-4

Hooray for the bad apples excuse!
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:13 AM
-12

You mean to suggest there are some women that are not like that?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:10 AM
-4

Or learn to stop breeding.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 01:54 PM
4

When injustice is applied to men, it does not mean that injustice should also be applied to women. It means injustice should be applied to neither.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:06 PM
6

Feminists don't want gender equality. They want female domination.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 11:56 PM
-2

Heh. How ironic for esteemed Scientology scumbag Catherine Bell to comment on ritual as a control mechanism.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 11:55 PM
0

Celebrating victory, methinks.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 11:43 PM
3

Hax.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 09:26 PM
23

What part of "get the fuck out" do you not understand, monster?
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:41 PM
24

Your subreddit is an extreme feminist circlejerk you created out of butthurt when even the other feminists thought you were a raving lunatic. It and you are pathetic. Mass downvotes are the least of what you deserve. Now get the fuck out of /r/MensRights. You have no place here.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:28 PM
35

Hey misandrist. Impolite notice from argv_minus_one: GTFO. No mass-downvote campaign was created. We all simply find your statement outrageously repugnant. That is not a conspiracy.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:04 PM
-1

I guess the idea is to find a woman you trust enough to not do that to you. That's a pretty tall order, but aren't proper monogamous couples supposed to trust each other with their lives anyway? That said, that shit is indeed fucking crazy. Even if you find a woman unwilling to fuck you over like that, that doesn't mean she should even be able to.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 06:28 AM
-2

Why would these drug addicts not want treatment for their addictions, then?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 07:58 AM
1

I take it the requested favors are invariably sexual?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 07:54 AM
21

People surprised: 0
/r/MensRights27/06/11 12:50 AM
1

A cut on a lip is a minor injury. A grown man can do vastly more damage than that to a four-year-old if he really wants to. A single such incident might be a good reason for anger management or something, but it is not a good reason to break up a family and put this man through hell.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 06:47 AM
-1

This reminded me of Calvin and Hobbes. I pledge allegiance to Queen Fragg and her mighty state of hysteria…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:36 AM
-2

Sounds fair to me.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 02:35 AM
-4

No, they're doing a valuable service.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 05:09 AM
-1

Then we'd best start with the suicides, 'cause you're completely right that victory is impossible.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 03:26 AM
0

I tagged like a dozen misandrists on that thread. Where the hell do they all keep coming from?
/r/MensRights19/06/11 03:12 AM
-1

Tagged a bunch of misandrist scumbags on that thread. Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 02:43 AM
-2

Because I know some men would go through the suffering women have to to bring their child into this world. And I know some psychiatrists that would love to get some drugs into those nutbars. forcing women to breed which by the way, was not a very classy thing to say. It was an accurate thing to say. That is all the justification I need.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:13 AM
-3

Did I miss a meme at some point?
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:54 AM
-5

I didn't say whether the statement is true, mind you, just that it applies to all women. Anyway, while I'm sure you're right that there are plenty of sane women that wouldn't dream of fucking another person over like that, they are (almost?) completely indistinguishable from the crazy bitches you need to worry about.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:53 AM
0

If feminism in general weren't that fucked up, there would be no need for a men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 07:20 AM
-1

Then you admit your own analogy is faulty. This begs the question: why the actual fuck did you make that analogy?
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:07 AM
-7

People like you make me wish murder was legal.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:05 AM
-8

it probably isn't too hard to abstain from condom-less sex until you're with someone you completely trust to stay on their birth control, and not lie to you about using it. What part of "you can't trust women" do you not understand? That statement applies to all women, not just most of them.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:01 AM
4

So, in summary, you favor forcing women to breed. Classy.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 05:55 AM
-3

And it would somehow be less awkward if it was a man doing the test and you got a boner anyway?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:31 PM
-3

I happen to suspect the mother in question was in way too much pain to give a flying fuck about who was watching. Priorities, man.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:27 PM
1

Speak for yourself. I am a 27 year old man that has never consumed an alcoholic beverage in his life and has no plans to change this practice.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 05:51 AM
0

No. I just felt like saying "moo" randomly.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:53 AM
1

I dunno, I can think of forms of torture that are arguably worse than rape. You can do some fucked up things to people if you have the desire and know-how.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:33 AM
5

AND MY AXE!
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:32 AM
1

I believe the poster is about sober men taking advantage of drunk women.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:31 AM
5

Anybody depraved enough to seriously believe that rape victims "asked for it" isn't going to be swayed by a poster, or anything else short of a bullet in the forehead.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:30 AM
1

Moo.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:29 AM
1

Granted, but it's not only feminists that would oppose something that horrible. I would too, and I'm no feminist.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:41 PM
2

What kind of idiotic caveman logic is that? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights10/06/11 02:13 PM
3

Aside from how fucked up that is, doing that would only help the feminazis' cause. Terrible idea.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 08:25 PM
2

Keep in mind that this is merely her public statement. Privately, she may be just as pissed as we are, but feel that she cannot win a case against the girls, that a trial would only traumatize her son further, or suchlike.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:40 PM
2

That is what passes for discipline in this fucked up society.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:37 PM
0

Regrettably, no mashed potatoes were involved.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:37 PM
1

Bullying is pretty bad, too, I should note.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:35 PM
2

No, they're not. Their behavior insults women as much as it insults men.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:16 PM
1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:49 PM
1

Why the actual fuck is your kid going to be examining his friends' cocks? Why is that such a hard talk to have? "Theirs had one like yours, but their parents had them cut off when they were babies." Simple. That still isn't an excuse for forcibly mutilating someone, you sick, perverted monster. Kill yourself.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:29 PM
1

Good for you. That does not justify forcing said cutting on someone else.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:11 PM
1

I can't speak for myself, but yes, I'm an angry, angry man. Also, genital mutilation is an atrocity and should be punished like any other mutilation.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:08 PM
3

That is not an excuse for such disgraceful behavior.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:53 PM
2

Do the human race a favor and kill yourself.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:47 PM
2

Quoting Henry Kissinger on issues of morality or ethics is like quoting Bernie Madoff on doing honest business.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:47 PM
7

I hope every single supporter of this atrocity dies in a fire.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:43 PM
-8

Downvote for Daily Fail.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:24 PM
3

As they say, never stick your dick in crazy. This bitch definitely qualifies.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:20 PM
0

Eat?
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:20 PM
14

Sounds like just the one Rev had a screw loose. Not much of a commentary on men's rights or such, though. There are crazy people of both sexes.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 06:20 PM
-3

Downvote for Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 07:45 AM
1

Not to mention the possibility of removing the uterus entirely. I wonder how many women would do this if they weren't required to have pushed out several brats already?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:43 AM
1

Ironic that a hippie invention would be used to facilitate warfare…
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:42 AM
1

<announcer from="Unreal Tournament">HEAD SHOT!</announcer>
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:41 AM
1

No, that means no one signing up for selective service. The very idea of conscription is an atrocity.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:34 AM
1

You do realize that tampons weren't even invented until recently, right? I'm not saying an extended field trip with poor sanitation will be fun for women—or men, for that matter—but you've got a lot of proving to do if you want me to believe that women are so drastically more vulnerable to crotch disease under those conditions.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:25 AM
1

Relevant
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:23 AM
1

Shouldn't urinary tract infections also happen to men?
/r/MensRights01/06/11 06:19 AM
5

3. You are a rapist if you get yourself drunk and have sex with her. Your drunkeness is no excuse. It would seem not.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 11:47 PM
2

Starting?
/r/MensRights30/05/11 11:46 PM
-25

Too lazy to look it up And yet you expect to convince me? but I do know that when my friend was deployed for long amounts of time the women were periodically shipped back to a FOB for hygiene reasons. Cool story, bro. The military wouldn't do it unless it was necessary. The military's entire existence is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 10:07 PM
1

The truth comes down to having a pussy and the likelihood of vaginal sepsis for extended field work. Citation needed.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 08:58 PM
-2

what happened to a vast number of female Russian snipers during WWII Namely? Searching Google for that phrase yields nothing of note.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 08:57 PM
1

Good on you, then. Your girlfriend is completely unlike OP's.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 08:43 PM
3

Making fapping more difficult?
/r/MensRights29/05/11 07:03 AM
-10

Suicide. There has never been a more comprehensive solution to life's problems.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 06:11 AM
1

Microwave? Jesus.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 11:25 PM
1

Proofread carefully to make sure you don't any words out.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:10 PM
1

At least the child porn is the genuine article, and not barely illegal teens that could pass for twentysomethings or something that one stumbled over on /b/.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:08 PM
2

In what country? Nigeria? In most of the United States, if you somehow don't get a life sentence for raping and killing a kid, a lynch mob will break into the prison you're in to draw and fucking quarter you. And that's assuming the other inmates don't all simultaneously shiv you first.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:05 PM
-3

This guy is delusional to think he can refuse to play the game without forfeiting in the process. He's just a beta with an especially bad case of butthurt.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 09:57 PM
-11

The article conveniently fails to mention the six jocks that undoubtedly dragged the boy into the locker room and sodomized him with a baseball bat for "dressing like a faggot".
/r/MensRights10/05/11 03:23 PM
1

They don't get any revenue unless someone actually clicks on an ad on their site.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 07:11 AM
1

That is a reasonable compromise.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:06 AM
0

What odd desires.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 11:46 PM
2

Transsexuals do not feel like their natal sex; they associate with being a member of the opposite sex in their mind and so they are drawn to the social conventions of the opposite sex as well. But social gender roles have been being rapidly deconstructed in the past few decades. No, it's just pointing out that men and women have bodies that behave quite differently (much of which depends on hormone production), and if you became a female you may start to miss many of the attributes you take for …
/r/MensRights08/05/11 11:26 PM
2

If you were in a female body but you felt like a male in every sense you would be a transsexual - whether you chose to act on it or not. I didn't say I feel like a male in every sense. I don't. I simply feel like myself. I take it transsexuals feel differently? If you got sick of having periods,thin skin, and not being able to build much muscle mass; then decided to reclaim some of your virility through hormone therapy then you'd be a female to male transsexual undergoing physical transition. Re…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 11:14 PM
3

Yet, if I feel like a female in every way (still acknowledging that genetically I may be male) and I choose to have my body reflect that part of who I am in what way am I being inauthentic? Trans women present themselves as female because that's a gender role and is not necessarily coupled with natal sex; this is honest self expression so it is not deception by any means That must be my problem. Gender roles are largely meaningless to me. I am male in every sense, but aside from bleeding much mo…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:55 PM
0

Yes. Since he did it completely passively, however, I do my best to ignore it.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 10:22 PM
-3

Then you are also deceiving yourself. Sad. That's all it is, though.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:12 PM
3

Hey now, alien on human is hot. Don't diss it 'till you've tried it.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:08 PM
-2

Because all trans people are just "pretending?" Do I even have to point out why that's offensive? Yes. I consider transsexuality as little more than an overly elaborate disguise. Perhaps you can enlighten me.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:08 PM
-4

The fact that "she" has deceived someone into having sex with what is actually another man. Many people are not fond of having their sexual orientations violated like that.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:08 PM
5

My trust has been violated. That person lied to me about what "she" really is. My sexual orientation has been violated. I have been deceived into having sex with another man.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 11:04 AM
7

That has been a challenge facing systems of justice for as long as there have been systems of justice. That's why we have courts and juries. There is no excuse for this atrocity in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 03:40 AM
7

Maybe we should go back to due Goddamn process.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 03:39 AM
2

That guy is far too rich to be worthy of our sympathy.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 08:06 PM
1

Politicians?
/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:21 AM
-8

You are a disgrace to your species. Redeem yourself; stop breathing.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:46 AM
1

Cigarettes and alcohol are not health care products, last I checked. If you have such a huge problem with waiting lists, why don't more of you come to the United States for treatment?
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:17 AM
2

That's exactly my point. Feminism doesn't imply misandry (or, at least, it used to not imply misandry), but the whack-jobs that loudly proclaim their feminism tend to be misandristic.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 01:00 PM
1

Pleased to meet you, then!
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:50 PM
3

Fine day to you too, ma'am, and thank you for the kind words.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:17 PM
3

You could use "egalitarian".
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:13 PM
2

Perhaps that is because the women who publicly call themselves "feminists" and make a big deal of it (except OP, presumably) are not feminists but misandrists, and are too blinded by their victim complex to realize it.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:12 PM
3

Can we not have a draft? I'd prefer that.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 10:08 PM
1

Oh! Troll programming. I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 06:00 PM
4

If you think American health care is cheaper overall, you clearly have no experience with the exorbitant costs of American health care and are talking out of your ass. Good day.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 10:40 PM
4

I think the issue is that these pastors are being shown as pedophiles even though they have yet to be convicted of any such thing. Seems like there's a good chance of there being some innocent people on that list.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 09:38 PM
-1

You flatter yourself. No great introspection is needed to become an atheist. All you have to do is want to fit in with the "cool kids" or rebel against your parents. While I'm sure some atheists did do a lot of critical thinking to arrive at their conclusion, don't kid yourself by thinking they all have. That's hogwash. Most atheists—as with people in general—are slobbering, unthinking retards content to follow the leader.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 09:35 PM
1

We do not have the ability to mutate the current laws. From our perspective, they are effectively immutable.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 12:09 AM
1

What? My username is a programming reference.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 12:09 AM
1

Then your stance here on this subject is like that of a nihilist. You are quite perceptive. I'm impressed. You are utterly defeated emotionally, perhaps? I am. Do you believe that humanity is little better than animals and are slaves to biology? That we are doomed to organize into hierarchies like chimps where the top "alpha" men and almost all women rule over what you might call "beta" males who will be forced as per biology to live a largely miserable exitence, maybe? Correct.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 07:26 PM
0

Define "optional". Optional to what? What is it you can still be, do, or have without having sex? Even living is in some ways "optional"—you can always commit suicide if you don't want to live. Without context, the word is meaningless.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:35 PM
1

The trend has been in the opposite direction—that of more unfairness toward men. Clearly there is a large misandristic current in society.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:33 PM
0

most of the dangers associated with sex are due to horrible legal system. You can actually put these dangers associated with sex out of existence. That is not true. The horrible legal system is here to stay. I realize it's man-made, but that doesn't mean it can be changed.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 05:06 PM
-1

A meaningless distinction. Both are dangers.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 02:16 PM
4

The only way to have sex safely is not to. Of course, the same applies to driving cars, working jobs, and breathing.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 11:44 AM
1

Site is broken—just keeps trying to redirect me indefinitely.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 10:56 AM
-3

Please tell me we are talking about Duke Nukem.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 07:54 AM
1

Oh lawdy, is that some No True Scotsman?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 06:24 AM
12

The women in question must be terribly insecure. That is not the fault of the men looking at them.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:13 PM
-2

At least the asshole admits to being a misogynistic pig, unlike you.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 12:22 PM
1

I guess so, but I always envisioned drive-by shootings as being done from a moving vehicle.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 08:59 AM
1

You are an embarrassment to our cause.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:51 AM
1

And attempting to shoot people from a moving vehicle isn't dangerous?
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:47 AM
1

And a perfectly even road, which I guarantee you no actual road actually is. Ever try recording video in a moving vehicle?
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:39 AM
1

They weren't actually sniping from inside a moving vehicle, were they?
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:35 AM
1

I guess so, but some random idiot on Twitter doesn't seem like much of a threat. /shrug
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:35 AM
-1

No, just your own warped world-view. ♥
/r/MensRights10/04/11 07:25 AM
1

Well, the driver might provide some of the functions of a spotter.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:37 PM
1

ignatiusloyola is completely correct. To be perfectly frank, you are being blatantly misogynistic, and I find it offensive. Patriarchal and matriarchal societies are both bad because they are both unbalanced—they value the interests of one sex over the other.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:19 PM
0

Ih. Her concern is valid. Planned Parenthood's mission (including the abortions) is very important and should not be compromised. Threatening to cut people's penises off is pretty stupid, though.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:53 PM
7

drive-by snipers I must say, that would be a hell of a show of marksmanship.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:51 PM
2

There are feminist reptiles now?!
/r/MensRights07/04/11 12:58 AM
1

I doubt it. Fox News is the mouthpiece of the Republican party; they're not about to change that now, market incentives be damned. The only thing we're doing by linking to their stories—any of their stories—is feeding the beast.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:08 AM
1

Beef with the network. I don't believe a word they say. In particular, I don't believe that there is an "American male suicide epidemic" just because Fox News says so.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:05 AM
0

Please don't link to Faux News.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 02:45 AM
2

At least she didn't live for years in a nursing home, starved of attention. What a horrible way to live…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:26 PM
1

Stop breathing.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:15 AM
-4

Please tell me "trama" is a portmanteau.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:12 AM
-1

With his dick, presumably.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:08 AM
2

I'm actually a specialist in evolution No, you're just a basement-dwelling douchebag with a superiority complex. blah blah other useless pseudoscientific horse shit Stop breathing.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:19 AM
2

I've never had that accusation leveled at me, thank $DEITY, but I've certainly heard of it, and it's infuriating. How dare these degenerate breeder scum call us selfish!
/r/MensRights27/03/11 11:39 PM
5

Wise words. People are foolish to think their kids will take care of them in their old age. Children rarely even call their parents, let alone take care of them. Plus it's an incredibly selfish expectation anyway.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 11:19 PM
1

You don't seem to understand how evolution works. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that you are an alpha. Humans are not lions. We don't even have alphas. We do seem to have arrogant idiots with hormonal imbalances, however. In-vitro fertilization is an adaptation, like any other. It doesn't break the rules.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 10:36 PM
3

I'm talking about society, not government. There are no "people in charge" of society. Moreover, the government does not tell people "the goal of life is to get married and have children." Ordinary people tell each other that.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 10:08 PM
1

I'm not sure I see how you made the leap from "having kids doesn't make people happier" to "having kids makes people delusional". Can you explain?
/r/MensRights27/03/11 10:05 PM
2

I want to have kids because I love this world and I want to give them the chance to enjoy it. And because I think humanity should continue and not stop short when this generation dies. Seriously? Don't you read the news?!
/r/MensRights27/03/11 09:55 PM
1

Sounds like some kind of bizarre, ineffectual zombie plague. Doesn't seem to be working too well, though, perhaps because while such degenerates breed like rabbits, they don't seem too good at anything else. Otherwise I'd be terrified.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:12 PM
3

But happiness is a state of mind. How can one only think one is happy without actually being happy as a result?
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:11 PM
2

Overpopulation. There is nothing wrong with the gene pool. Contrary to popular opinion, natural selection remains in full effect on humans—if a person survives, it is because they are fit to survive, one way or another. Modern medicine does not enable people to violate natural selection. You're an arrogant, aggressive little shit. Not a particularly good genetic contribution, I suspect, and you'd make a lousy father.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:07 PM
3

You do not have a right to have children. That is a privilege you can only earn by encountering someone willing and able to impregnate you or donate their child to you.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:05 PM
1

Wow, you're a real fucking winner. /s I hate to break this to you, but you reproducing is not good for our species. I urge you to reconsider.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:49 PM
23

The explanation is simple: everybody wants kids (they're "cute" or whatever) but nobody wants to raise them (because that's hard work). The solution to this (and every other child-related problem) is for people to get over themselves, stop breeding, and find something better to do with their lives.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:48 PM
16

Problem for the men they victimize, you mean.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:45 PM
2

Is contraceptive failure not the usual cause of unwanted pregnancy in those areas where contraception is readily available?
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:26 AM
2

No. You should be punched in the face for your trolling.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:03 AM
1

There desperately needs a way to punch people like you in the face over the Internet.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:01 AM
2

I have him tagged simply "troll". There should be a way for people to share / import each other's tags, and maybe vote on them.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 08:59 AM
3

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights22/03/11 01:41 PM
20

Good God, what kind of retards run that city?!
/r/MensRights22/03/11 01:38 PM
2

They're not entitled to perpetuating their lies and propping up their "rape culture" culture.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 08:24 AM
2

…According to the Daily Mail. Probably a complete fabrication. Please check your sources before posting.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 08:19 AM
3

That sort of story could be used to get away with any murder. …Or, rather, it would, except that some police departments apparently bother investigating the physical evidence (or lack thereof) of a rape and murder, instead of just believing the hysterical bitch making the claim. Good on the cops for doing a proper investigation on this vicious murderer.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 08:14 AM
1

Are you kidding? Feminists would love this.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 05:15 AM
2

That's misogynistic, misandristic, and mis-a-whole-bunch-of-other-groups-istic, all at the same time. Impressive.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:51 AM
0

No. Stop being intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 08:23 AM
0

Blaming the victim is exactly what you're doing. Giving up some of one's rights to the cops like you suggest will only invite them to take away more of said rights.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 01:11 AM
2

I said the Religious Wrong wouldn't welcome that. They represent Jesus about as much as Osama bin Laden represents humankind.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 12:29 AM
3

That's not a good reason to classify him as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 09:14 AM
2

The Religious Wrong wouldn't welcome that.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 09:14 AM
2

Fascinating. Thank you for this piece. My brain has been fed. :)
/r/MensRights10/03/11 08:50 AM
1

…From your post history, you appear to be either a troll or very, very angry. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:21 PM
1

Link please.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:37 PM
1

You know, saying "lulzlulzlulzlulzlulz" doesn't make you funnier. It just makes you sound like a prepubescent boy.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:24 PM
1

Right. There still is a cap, though. Too many kids and the conditions will be atrocious enough to catch CPS' attention. That's my point.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:55 AM
1

Your kids? This psycho intends to saddle you with children, too? Dump that bitch while you still can!
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:44 AM
2

I use the word "raise" very loosely, mind you—by "raise" I mean "not subject them to such extreme neglect as to attract attention from CPS". Actually raising kids becomes impossible after more than around two of them.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:35 AM
4

So, everybody is pretty much fucked.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:31 AM
1

You do have to still raise the brats. That puts a practical cap of sorts on it, but it's not very low. One woman can still fuck over a good half dozen men this way.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:17 AM
-2

Please do not link to the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 07:10 AM
1

You do, however, get rendered unemployable, among other things. Prison might start seeming like a nice place after enough of that…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 02:16 AM
7

Aren't accused rapists already guilty until proven innocent?
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:12 PM
1

I'd wager most people (if offered a ridiculous amount of money without working that hard for it) would accept it without balking too much. Think about models, actors, ect. Models, actors, and the like are not normal people. Frankly, their behavior is as if they have some kind of mental illness. Ethics is not about rejecting a benefit without working hard for it. Ethics is about not depriving others of what is rightfully theirs. Example: a million dollars, if offered to you without justification,…
/r/MensRights03/03/11 01:52 AM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 06:17 PM
1

Maybe your mother didn't teach you anything about ethics, but most people wouldn't accept a million dollars just like that.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 06:17 PM
1

It's a numbers game So, women are little more than numbers to you?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:39 PM
2

if given a choice between an equally-attractive nice "beta", would these girls really still go for the jerk? Bad question. We're arguing that jerks are more attractive by virtue of being jerks.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:35 PM
1

If any of us were the most attractive guy in a given group, we'd likely not feel the need to put much effort into it. Love? Ethics? We're talking about dating here, not stock picking.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:34 PM
10

tl;dr: Women prefer assholes. What the hell else is new?
/r/MensRights27/02/11 03:51 AM
4

Um, they wandered into the woods? Who the hell follows a stranger into the woods?! Not sure if the alleged victim was actually raped, but she was pretty clearly an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 06:31 AM
0

I can pee without using my hands And I can masturbate without lubrication, using a condom/towel/whatnot, or making a mess. I don't suppose your "family tradition" also involves trying to stop your children from fapping?
/r/MensRights24/02/11 08:11 PM
1

You have no such right. Circumcision of an infant is a violation of the human rights of said infant. Family tradition does not trump human rights. In time, the law of the land will reflect this truth.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 07:59 PM
1

No, I just don't feel the need to spoon-feed you links to the rest of my comments on this post. You get to find them yourself like a big boy. ♥
/r/MensRights24/02/11 02:02 AM
6

This is what happens when we allow stupid people to reproduce: they draw a shoddy conclusion from flimsy data and use it to justify atrocities. And then there's that arrogant dickhead, Joseph Klein, commenting: Crying and some discomfort is inevitable, but that's true of many things in a childhood. It is, however minimal when you do when they are infant. Apparently this vicious monster has somehow forgotten that one of the most sensitive parts of a person's body is being amputated without anesth…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 01:13 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 11:47 PM
4

Then change the future by not mutilating your sons (if any).
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:42 PM
8

I do not have to give extra attention to cleaning beneath the foreskin every shower As the proud bearer of a foreskin, I would like to inform you that said cleaning is ridiculously simple, not uncomfortable in the slightest, and not inconvenient in any way.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:35 PM
1

You're horribly mutilating one of the most sensitive organs on a helpless child without anesthesia. The resulting pain is unquestionably extreme. For that, you are a horrible, cold-blooded monster and I hope you burn.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:27 PM
6

Vaccines prevent disease. Genital mutilation might, kinda-sorta-maybe, but nowhere near effectively enough to justify the risk, damage, and pain that it causes.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 08:21 PM
2

Well, ladies and gentlemen, how many more Goddamn reasons not to reproduce do you need? If you breed, some vicious cops are likely to show up at night and drag away your beloved children! Shit. It's hard enough to protect oneself in this fucked up world, let alone one's kids. Save yourself the grief—don't have any.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 05:05 AM
1

I was under the assumption that this woman abused her children simply because she had so many of them. …A pretty stupid assumption, I admit.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:52 AM
3

Stop breeding!
/r/MensRights21/02/11 04:50 AM
1

You are blatantly lying. Arguing with you clearly will not serve any further purpose, so instead I have added you to my block list. Good day.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 11:28 PM
1

That woman nearly killed him in the same fashion!
/r/MensRights20/02/11 08:57 PM
1

Then they're money-grubbing crooks in need of disregarding.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 06:58 AM
2

He didn't "beat her to death", you malevolent, duplicitous, willfully ignorant neofeminist troll. She attacked him, he fought back, and she suffered a head injury that ended up killing her. Beating her to death implies hitting her after she was incapacitated, which (as far as the article states) did not happen.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 06:56 AM
2

/facepalm
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:11 PM
2

You mean to tell me they think standards of physical fitness are sexist?!
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:52 AM
2

Why do they care about the number of women serving?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:40 AM
2

I don't follow.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:09 AM
4

Why would feminists want lower physical fitness/strength standards for women?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 02:13 AM
4

She picked a Goddamn fight with him. What the hell would you expect? "Wouldn't hit a girl"?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 02:09 AM
1

No. What's the story?
/r/MensRights16/02/11 08:11 PM
0

Jesus. Just when you thought 40-on-15 was creepy.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 04:10 PM
1

A worthy story, but why is this in MensRights? Are men's rights being violated somehow?
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:54 PM
1

Fuck you, Kim Pearson. Crack open a thermometer and suck on the contents, you monster.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:02 PM
-5

The use of the term 'seduction' implies that he's somehow hoodwinking women into screwing him when they otherwise would not, yes? The use of some sort of trick instead of being honestly and genuinely desirable? Or am I misunderstanding you? If I'm understanding you correctly, that doesn't speak too highly of his victims, letting themselves be seduced by a doucheballoon like that, but that does not excuse him, either.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 08:36 PM
-1

he's mainly into seduction techniques, chilling out and getting laid. So, a misogynistic douchebag. Swell. But then… He's a pretty cool guy in person. Huh?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 07:57 PM
13

Well, to be fair, they're not really big on women with careers over there. Women depend on men—marry or starve. Now that the "marry" option seems to be rapidly disappearing, what else can they do? Their entire society appears to be crumbling, really.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 05:50 PM
13

"I spent the night at one guy's house, and nothing happened—we just went to sleep!" moaned one incredulous woman on a TV program devoted to herbivores. Oh, the irony. That sounds like the average Western woman's wet dream.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:59 PM
5

He was conscious enough to scream in pain and struggle.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:11 AM
1

So why the "women like her" part?
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:01 AM
8

I'd like to reiterate that the hospital she worked for is atrociously fucked up as well. Their sins include: Failing to notice that the patient was inadequately medicated Continuing the surgery despite the patient's extreme pain Holding the patient down when he tried to get away from the doctors people torturing him Hospital spokesman/leader type (I forget who) claimed that cancelling the surgery was up to the hospital staff (but not the patient) I hope this hospital gets slapped with an investi…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 11:26 PM
3

Isn't that what pretty much everyone does when cornered?
/r/MensRights12/02/11 11:22 PM
1

Um, why the fuck did the hospital staff not attempt to stop the procedure when it became clear that he was not adequately medicated? And since when was it not the decision of the patient as to whether the procedure should be stopped? Incompetently run hospital is run incompetently. I would avoid it if at all possible. And I hope these sick Mengele-style pseudoctors get slapped with a firm dick ethics investigation.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 01:02 PM
-1

Damn, you must be a horrible lay. You sure this "girlfriend" you sleep with isn't your hand?
/r/MensRights11/02/11 12:16 PM
0

Bullshit. They won't give her that. They'll give her a "oh, we're so sorry you got seduced by that evil, evil teenage boy, have some child support payments and congratulations on your baby♥" treatment.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 12:15 PM
1

Um, in the United States, you can't get a legal abortion in the second trimester either, save for said extreme circumstances. So the inability of a woman to support her children is not an excuse for forcing said child-support payments on the children's father? Correct.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 01:54 AM
1

Yeah, that's the part I can't understand. If the physical act of having children is half as horrible as they themselves claim, why the hell would they keep doing it?! Because they want children enough to see said physical act as a worthy sacrifice, perhaps? Not that this makes any sense to me, of course, but I guess that's their own damn business. That still doesn't excuse compelling someone that doesn't want kids to have them, though.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 12:59 PM
1

Yes, I gathered that. That does not answer my question. Why anyone would want a kid still makes zero sense to me.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 12:17 PM
2

Maybe so, but pregnancy is a horrible burden. It makes you physically ill for nine months, and childbirth is so singularly horrific it'd make those sadistic freaks running Abu Ghraib squirm. God, the screams… Who the hell would hold anyone to a promise to torture themselves, if not for the baby? Why the hell does a baby make it okay to hold someone to a promise to torture themselves? No one has the right to compel or even encourage another person to endure such a nightmare.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 12:13 PM
1

Your argument might be sound, but because I despise children and fear my ability to conceive one, it makes no sense to me. Why, for starters, would any man be concerned with children he conceives, aside from getting away from them?
/r/MensRights10/02/11 12:08 PM
0

Your arguments might be sound, but because I despise children and fear my ability to conceive one, they make no sense to me. Why, for starters, would any man be concerned with children he conceives, aside from getting away from them?
/r/MensRights10/02/11 11:28 AM
2

Yes. If he wants the sprog that badly, he should have to carry it himself, and physical inability to do so is not an excuse for forcing said carriage on someone else. By and large, I completely agree with the sentiment in this post and most of the commenters, but I very much disagree with restrictions on abortion. No one should ever be forced to keep something in their body against their will.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 08:17 AM
0

So, they're both driven and crooked? Lucky, perhaps? What are you trying to prove? If success were possible for everyone, almost everyone would be successful, simply because their survival instinct demands that they be.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 12:18 AM
1

Works every time. But you go to jail for using it…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 12:07 AM
1

Okay, okay, she's abusive and also crazy.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 12:04 AM
1

I suspect that most people with economic success are not driven but crooked (or possibly born with a silver spoon in their asses).
/r/MensRights08/02/11 09:58 AM
1

You're right on the money, if you'll pardon the pun.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:59 AM
3

It's bad for those that don't have it but don't want to be forever alone, which is to say the vast majority of the human race.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:56 AM
7

Being "driven", as the recent economic catastrophe has aptly demonstrated, has little if anything to do with one's economic success.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:50 AM
2

I dunno, isn't abusiveness a kind of crazy?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:47 AM
5

You can always abort them if all else fails. Men have no such option.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 10:44 PM
5

She's crazy. Simple.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 10:43 PM
1

Loving relationships are about trust. If you can't trust the other person, you shouldn't be in such a relationship with them.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 10:43 PM
14

You may as well just break up now and be celibate for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 10:42 PM
2

Good God. Poor Stewie.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 07:17 PM
1

That is not a good reason to defend your girlfriend. A good reason to defend your girlfriend is that you love her. You do love her, do you not?
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:26 AM
1

Stewie Griffin?! Stewie Griffin is much too sophisticated to say such things as "ewwwww do not want". Stewie Griffin has dignity and class and vocabulary.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:24 AM
1

Lesson learned: some cops are awesome.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:20 AM
1

You're completely right that there is a problem with society. That doesn't mean there is a problem with this sign.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:08 AM
2

You're completely right that there is a problem with society. That doesn't mean there is a problem with this sign.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:06 AM
2

I don't have children and I don't intend to make any. Even if I did, I sure as hell would not be subjecting them to cold-blooded Goddamn torture. Force-feeding of hot sauce and ice-cold showers are practices fit for Guantanamo prisoners, not seven-year-old children! I'm not sure what kind of fucked up household you were brought up in to learn that these atrocities are acceptable, but this is a civilized country where we do not tolerate child abuse. If you get caught committing such atrocities an…
/r/MensRights29/01/11 08:17 PM
2

And I suppose you also think waterboarding is not torture? Perish, monster, and burn brightly for your sins.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 11:22 AM
0

only religious people are this fucking dumb. gb2/r/atheism, troll.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 11:22 AM
3

Doesn't matter. You willingly take cold showers and eat things with tons of hot sauce. This child is being forced into suffering extreme pain, which is the very definition of torture.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 11:21 AM
3

Discomfort is not the same thing as cold-blooded torture, you Goddamn whack-job libertardian shitbag.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 11:16 AM
2

Then you would rather leave the child to this crazy sadistic bitch's tender mercies? Or do you have some other proposal for preventing her from torturing this child?
/r/MensRights29/01/11 11:15 AM
1

Whatever else the words mean, they are widely held to be a way of "shaming" assertive women, particularly those who are sexually assertive. What ill could I possibly speak of any female that could not be interpreted this way? Those who seek to shame women for being sexually assertive will use whatever words and means are available to them. If I am to use no words that could possibly imply that this is my intention, then I cannot voice disapproval of any kind of any female at all. her level of se…
/r/MensRights28/01/11 07:23 PM
3

"Whore" is a pejorative term relating to female sexuality No. I do not agree with this sentiment at all. It is a pejorative for selling that which should not be sold, selling to those that should not be sold to, and going to lengths to make oneself attractive specifically to those that should not be attracted. This applies to male prostitutes as well. It adds nothing to toss out the word "whore," which is a specifically female pejorative word. You are again mistaken. Male whores are equally unim…
/r/MensRights28/01/11 06:21 PM
35

What is this, the Dark Ages?
/r/MensRights28/01/11 04:44 PM
2

Worse? I said this girl looks like a whore. I did not call for the trampling of women's rights, say all women should get back in the kitchen, or any other such misogynistic nonsense. The only blanket statement I conceivably made was to insult whores by comparing them with this heartless waste of human flesh. I admit that's not fair—most whores are not cold-blooded killers, after all.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 09:19 AM
2

TIL women never judge men by their looks.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 08:17 PM
3

That girl looks like a whore. Not that it's relevant to the stomping a man to death, but just sayin'.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 04:42 PM
2

Good!
/r/MensRights26/01/11 03:47 PM
3

Okay, grand, Japanese people are not having enough sex. $64k question that this article fails to answer or even talk about: Why?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:04 PM
3

There are quite a few ways for most people to become non-fat, though. Becoming devoid of foreskin, on the other hand, can only really be accomplished one way: cutting it off.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 08:12 AM
4

I'd still say no.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 08:10 AM
1

But she also said (elsewhere) that she doesn't want his money.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 01:20 AM
1

Depends. Some of them don't. The rest are lazy leeches, and they say that because they can. Reverse the roles and social expectations and male lazy leeches would do exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:53 AM
2

Wow. You're awesome.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:50 AM
4

That behavior is hardwired in her brain I really can't agree with this. There are very few behaviors in humans that are truly hard-wired, and most of them are simple muscle movements.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:46 AM
1

Huh? I think she's saying she'd rather be more or less economically separate from him, as they were before the relationship began. What's so impossible about this?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:43 AM
0

Why is that?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:41 AM
1

Obvious troll is obvious. GTFO.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 11:14 AM
1

Strikes me that this was about confiding in someone that he thought he was gay. What kind of degenerates was he hanging out with that this was considered worthwhile gossip?!
/r/MensRights07/01/11 07:57 AM
11

Indeed. The problem with the idea that suicide is selfish is that it takes an enormous amount of courage to face down: a screaming survival instinct, the nagging doubt that suicide is not the right decision, the overwhelming sense of imminent and irreversible loss, the pain of death, and the risk of failing to die and instead becoming crippled. Killing oneself is not an easy thing to do. If it were, I wouldn't be around right now to tell you this. To anyone that does it anyway, you are a courage…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 04:16 AM
23

I somehow doubt that doing a service to humanity—the same humanity to which the rapist of his nightmares belongs—was high on his list of priorities. If it was, it shouldn't have been. Humans are scum. Half the time they'll egg you on before you commit suicide and only cry about you after you're already dead, harping on about how they wish they could have done something as if they didn't blatantly squander the ample opportunity they were given to do so. If they don't egg you on, they'll spout the…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:54 AM
2

And that is why (competent) therapists are useful. They can do better than that.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:42 AM
5

And the shitty therapists will go to extreme lengths to disguise themselves as competent ones.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:41 AM
9

Just because some people eventually recover from being raped doesn't mean all of them do. Some do not. Bill Zeller did not. Besides, even if being raped as a child wasn't what ultimately killed him, it's still a horrible thing to be a victim of.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:38 AM
5

Though I never knew this man from Adam, I still regret not having been there to protect him from whoever raped him… Rest in peace, sir.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:30 AM
1

the only time mensrights should be concerned are when men's rights are violated You are mistaken. Go away.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:54 PM
1

You sure live up to your name.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:52 PM
1

Reality is scarier than fiction. FTFY
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:51 PM
5

Circumcision is done without anesthesia, you fool. It is about as painless as being strapped to an operating table and having your arm slowly sawed off with a butter knife. Genital mutilation is, by far, the most horrific thing most males will ever suffer. Thank $DEITY they almost never remember it, but that is not an excuse for such barbarism. Please tell me you aren't allowed to make any actual decisions on this matter.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:48 PM
2

Not so simple. Most people don't do shit like this. This woman most likely had an atrocious upbringing as well.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:45 PM
2

And whatever you do, don't feed them!
/r/MensRights01/01/11 03:41 AM
2

What about sufficiently kinky sex?
/r/MensRights31/12/10 09:51 AM
7

The fact is that too many men take sex as a given, as a right What? I know of this happening in Afghanistan, but around here that sort of thing seems to usually be frowned on. too many women are brought up believing that sex has to be taken from them. If that is true, it's by religious zealots whose teachings have no basis in reality and may be safely ignored. If you're a sexually promiscuous male, you're awesome. No. If you're a sexually promiscuous male, you're a douchebag. Women are taught th…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 03:12 AM
1

How is that an excuse?
/r/MensRights28/12/10 09:10 AM
-1

Then what of all the old people, like my mom and her relatives, that don't have said outdated mentality? Am I the descendant of a long and noble line of freaking geniuses or something?
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:53 AM
2

What is the excuse of these old people for having such an outdated mentality?
/r/MensRights27/12/10 02:41 AM
1

The fact that one can be "suckered into" marriage is already evidence that something is wrong.
/r/MensRights24/12/10 04:51 PM
14

Welcome aboard, then, sir or madam. Why were you skeptical of men's rights before?
/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:29 PM
1

Sounds like a real winner, this one. Keep in mind that a large part of the reason the lacrosse team got shafted was not because of this bitch but because of the crack-smoking, two-faced DA.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:18 PM
2

New phrase learned: "pussy pass"
/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:13 PM
1

I said "false rape allegations". Meaning, consensual sex, but then the woman cries rape in an attempt to extract money from the guy she fucked. Condoms are good, but they aren't perfect. There are a bunch of diseases they don't protect against. In a one-night stand, it's a roll of the dice.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 08:45 PM
1

By the way, I said that being willing to have one-night stands makes you a stupid person, not an immoral one. Morality's got nothing to do with it; I'm talking about protecting your own hide from unwanted pregnancy, false rape allegations, sexually transmitted diseases, and all the other ridiculous risks of screwing around.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 08:50 AM
1

It's safer than driving a car during a snowstorm while a police officer follows you and carefully records your every move, possibly falsifying evidence against you if you fail to provide any yourself. Which is to say, not safe.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 04:35 AM
2

A one-night stand doesn't make you a bad person. It does, however, make you a stupid one.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 05:21 AM
2

To be fair, one does have to be pretty batshit insane to commit most of the heinous crimes we all know and love.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 05:17 AM
1

You and my dad would like each other, heh.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:34 PM
2

Anyone stupid enough to use logic like that deserves to wind up with whatever douchenozzle they're after.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:33 PM
1

I agree with you that it sounds dubious. Just pointing out a possible explanation is all.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 10:08 AM
1

Well yeah, it'd be kind of a waste of time to hit on someone that's married…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:47 PM
2

I'm not sure I'd call it natural. A social norm, to be sure, but what evidence do you really have that it's defined by nature?
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:46 PM
4

Well, to be fair, women do usually like to feel pretty. It could be more about her desires than his.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:46 PM
2

If you're already attractive, why is it a priority to make yourself more so?
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:44 PM
1

You're a complete douchebag, but you made me lol anyway. Congrats. :D
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:42 PM
7

ALERT: INTERNET TOUGH GUY DETECTED
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:41 PM
6

If all you're basing it on is her tweet, well, that tweet sounds pretty ambiguous.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 07:31 PM
44

DISREGARD CHILDREN ACQUIRE CURRENCY
/r/MensRights19/12/10 07:31 PM
3

Um, her children are 20, 19, 16, and 11. RTFA.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 02:24 PM
5

You are my hero.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 09:25 AM
-1

No, you shouldn't. Neither should men. If you want to murder brown people, go sign up—I ain't stopping you. But don't pass your hawkish bullshit on the rest of us.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 09:23 AM
8

Stings should be considered entrapment and illegal. Pain and anguish to the practitioners of this horrible tactic.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 07:34 AM
2

I've heard that snuff films don't exist.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 07:31 AM
-3

I wish I could downvote you repeatedly, for linking to Daily Mail and then again for claiming it is a "better news source".
/r/MensRights13/12/10 07:30 AM
15

MANSLAUGHTER?!
/r/MensRights12/12/10 04:10 PM
3

You're damned right about that. People need to (wo)man up and stop exploiting each other like this. It's sick.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:52 PM
2

That's so sad…
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:39 PM
4

The only people that will tell not to be "picky" are douchebags that weren't "picky", got screwed, and wish to pass the resulting misery to you. Ignore them. This is spending your life with someone we're talking about. I can't think of many situations in which one should be more picky.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:32 PM
3

Wimmins be just that powerful. And I don't blame men for being wary. I wonder if that's why men had so much power back in the day?
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:30 PM
3

And for that, you are awesome.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 08:29 PM
2

How far they've fallen since then…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 11:12 AM
1

Children are not innocent. They are parasitic monsters.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 11:11 AM
0

Those people are sick.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 11:10 AM
1

Important distinction.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 08:38 PM
1

Well, you're completely right about that, of course. I was trying to point out that, given the chance, the homeless guy might be just as much a predator too, but he never gets that chance.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 08:25 PM
8

Oh, but you will stop being a good dad (or a dad of any description, for that matter) if you get falsely accused of raping your daughter and imprisoned because no jury would acquit in such a case.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 02:47 AM
4

They also aren't likely to let their guard down around the smelly homeless guy. Plus he's probably weak from malnutrition—not good for him if he's planning on raping anybody. This isn't really a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 02:44 AM
1

What's to stop depraved female lesbian pedophiles from using little girls' underwear as fuck rags?
/r/MensRights06/12/10 01:50 AM
2

Sickening…
/r/MensRights05/12/10 02:35 AM
6

99% of depraved pedophiles buying little girls underwear are using them as jizz rags for their sick fantasies. FTFY
/r/MensRights05/12/10 02:34 AM
1

every firmly-closeted actor and singer hoping to still appeal to the teenage girl market who still buys CDs and tickets But I thought teenage girls loved hot gay men?
/r/MensRights04/12/10 10:08 PM
1

This makes me fear for your kid…
/r/MensRights04/12/10 10:06 PM
8

The most powerful people in the world want Julian Assange dead or captured. You can't tell me this isn't a set-up.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 11:24 AM
8

They don't want to question him. That's an obvious trap. What they want is to kidnap him and hand him over to the CIA. Skype will obviously not accomplish that, which is why they've refused. The most powerful people in the world want Julian Assange dead or captured. It is only a matter of time before they succeed.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:56 AM
-9

A murder he didn't commit.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:45 AM
1

He'd get kidnapped by the CIA, tortured into revealing whatever the CIA wants to know from him (there's always something), then thrown in a cell to rot in case some other use for him comes up before he dies.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:44 AM
4

And who did you hear this from, exactly? The same whore that likely got paid off and/or threatened with death by the CIA to say so? My bullshit alarm is beeping.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:42 AM
5

TIL: In Sweden, it is rape if you yell "surprise" first.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 10:41 AM
2

That it is not. Two wrongs do not make a right, after all.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 01:03 AM
1

Since when were pedophiles responsible?
/r/MensRights03/12/10 12:40 AM
1

When I posted my comment, the score was -15. /shrug
/r/MensRights03/12/10 12:38 AM
2

I didn't say it was a big difference, only that there is a difference. The result is more or less the same, of course.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 12:37 AM
-3

Please note that false allegations of rape are not altogether unlikely to result in a prison sentence and actual prison rape.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 09:52 PM
2

That's an interesting perspective. ⬆ How, then, might pedophilia be prevented?
/r/MensRights02/12/10 07:12 AM
3

So, you expect that pedophilia will become accepted practice?
/r/MensRights02/12/10 07:09 AM
1

What about robots?
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:15 AM
-1

So, you mean to defend said sociopathic bitches and their use of rape allegations to wield authority over innocent guys? Do go on.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:12 AM
1

…Are you an actual troll, or are you just trolling the trolls? Should I downvote you or upvote you? Ow, my brain! /headsplosion
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:11 AM
3

That douchenozzle is not representative of the membership of this reddit, as evidenced by the very low score on the offending comment.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:10 AM
-5

I should point out that pedophilia itself is probably a mental illness of sorts. Sane people do not desire or attempt sex with children.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:06 AM
5

Heh. Providing sex education. That's original.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 06:04 AM
1

What part of "extreme" do you not understand? No one is ever qualified to decide for someone else if that much pain is worth it. A shot is one thing, but unanesthetized circumcision is worse than some torture methods!
/r/MensRights02/12/10 01:14 AM
1

I thought women prefer hands-off psychological torture.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:03 AM
3

Tacit approval ≠ official sanction.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:02 AM
0

Infliction of extreme pain is not "subjective". What the hell is wrong with you?!
/r/MensRights30/11/10 08:40 AM
0

That is not an excuse for the cruelty it involves. What part of that are you not getting?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 08:06 AM
1

I am not attempting to prove that foreskins change orgasms. I am attempting to get it through your thick Goddamn skull that all male orgasms are not created equal. You don't need a study for that, just experience with having orgasms (not a difficult accomplishment—use your hand) and the observation that they are all different.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 07:35 AM
1

I had hoped to counter you pro-circ savages' notion that it helps protect against diseases. Sadly, I failed. I maintain, however, that circumcision is a cruel practice with no place in a civilized culture. Lowering the risk of HIV transmission a little is not an excuse for mutilating helpless infants without anesthesia.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 07:27 AM
2

I need only one soulmate, and virginity is not a requirement. So no.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 05:43 AM
2

I said secretly. As in, not openly. Why hasn't misspoppy.com been DoS'd into oblivion by 4chan yet?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 05:41 AM
2

This is being done by female staff? How odd…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:44 AM
2

What makes you think the suicide bombers aren't fapping secretly?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:07 AM
1

A group of men were just recently fined for socializing too close to children, the assumption being that the men were pedophiles. FTFY Women, not men, are polled on whether they want men to be circumcised, because (like the Middle East) women are the guarantors of hearth, home, and sexual fecundity. If a woman is displeased with her partner's genitalia, he could lose any chance at procreation; thus, women are encouraged to choose the designer genitalia they most prefer and that which their daugh…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:05 AM
2

Oh? All those Christian zealots with their persecution complexes—including the males—seem to have no problem at all doing this.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:02 AM
-1

Prison rape is not an officially sanctioned punishment. Stoning under Shari'ah is. Your comparison is invalid.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:01 AM
0

Depends on whose study you're looking at. Circumcision reduces rates of HPV, HIV, and HSV infection, and reduces the risk of cervical and anal cancer in partners: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4BG7CM20081217 Counterpoint: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/vanhowe4/ It also reduces the chances of the male himself getting penile cancer: http://www.cfpc.ca/cfp/2003/sep/vol49-sep-critical-1.asp Link is 404. True, but since the decision would be made for the child anyway, does it matter…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:57 AM
0

Removal of wisdom teeth is done under anesthesia. Circumcision is not, and in all likelihood, causes extreme pain in the recipient. You'd better have a damned good reason to do something that causes extreme pain to a helpless baby. Otherwise you are a monster.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:50 AM
0

An orgasm is an orgasm is an orgasm (at least for men) Clearly you have never had an especially good or especially bad orgasm. Furthermore, clearly you have no idea what the hell you're talking about, and would be well advised to shut your hole before making any more of an ass of yourself. Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:45 AM
1

Reason #29303 to ban all acts of cruelty. Disgusting. FTFY
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:40 AM
2

I've never gotten any sex ever and I've no desire to suicide-bomb anyone.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:35 AM
2

If it were, political correctness would not apply to it.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:34 AM
1

Since when were single women allowed to adopt?
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:26 AM
-2

My bullshit alarm is beeping.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 06:59 AM
2

It gets worse. As far as the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was concerned, any promises the government made to Dejarnette applied only to the laws in effect at the time. What part of ex post facto does this court not understand?!
/r/MensRights15/11/10 02:24 AM
1

Do I even want to know what a "spankbank" is?
/r/MensRights15/11/10 02:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter