TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aribolab Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by aribolab on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Societal expectations regarding their role in the family and at work are right now more rigid than with women, while there are negative connotations (‘toxic masculinity’) around their traditional roles and attitudes which they are still expected to perform e.g. protect the family and the country. Also there are types of work in which they are expected to perform well just because they are men, and if not they risk being psychologically (and sometimes physically) diminished.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:20 PM
2

Because they are pushing for another marriage
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:53 AM
3

Thank you for your research and dedication to write it and share it.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:56 PM
1

Contempt only works when you have something they want: power, money, beauty. If you don’t, contempt is pathetic. You first need to build attraction. Louis XIV’s contempt is not a beggar’s contempt.
/r/seduction25/10/19 10:49 AM
21

Great advice 🤙🏼
/r/seduction06/09/19 04:51 PM
3

You actually don’t know. Every gay person has a voice I believe. I’m sure there are “white men” crazy enough to share her feelings. It’s really not a question of labels, but of mental balance, which is more of a reality than group tagging.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:39 PM
1

Yes, I see your point and I agree there is some of that.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:12 PM
1

Macho is mainly for animals not humans. In humans it has a very different connotation and use. Have you really read the definition of the RAE you link to? Está clarito, macho.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 11:01 PM
0

No, it’s not. I’m also from Spain.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:59 PM
1

Macho is for animals, not humans. In the human context, it has a different connotation. On any form they don’t ask “macho o hembra” (male or female), they ask “hombre o mujer” (man or woman) (in the past it was “hombre y hembra” btw)
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:58 PM
3

Macho is used for animals, not humans. For humans has a different connotation (as indicated by the first commentator in this thread), which was positive before and now it’s more ambiguous, even negative e.g. “no te hagas tanto el macho” = “don’t behave like an alpha male”
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:55 PM
1

Macho is male for animals, not for humans.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:52 PM
2

Or simply “muerte al hombre”
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:51 PM
2

No, for humans “macho” is not male. It’s just for animals. Macho for humans means “a man that behaves like a macho”, “macho man”.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:50 PM
1

No, it means a “macho man”, a man that behaves like a macho. Death to males, would be “Muerte a los machos” btw
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:46 PM
3

It doesn’t say “death to men”. It says “death to the macho”, meaning the values of the macho man. Also, it’s a sign from an extreme, anarchist fringe.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:45 PM
2

Drops the 🎤 Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter