TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arktouros Archive

View 2 posts and 47 comments by arktouros on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Lost the battle but now we have twice the numbers?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:48 AM
1

I also know that the rankings are specifically skewed because they factor in gov healthcare as a positive that has its own subcategory. If that isn't bias, I don't know what is. I remember reading (at least last year) that if you look specifically at quality of care, US was #1. I'm assuming that hasn't changed much in a year.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:07 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/29/most-efficient-healthcare_n_3825477.html http://www.bloomberg.com/visual-data/best-and-worst/most-efficient-health-care-countries http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization_ranking_of_health_systems_in_2000
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:50 AM
1

One in which I don't want.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 08:40 PM
1

You realize thay government is literally a corporation, right? Like, government has to incorporate itself.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:33 PM
1

I wasn't saying it wouldn't work. I was saying it would work terribly.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:25 PM
1

If I'm paying for it either way, what's the point in getting gov involved at all? ERs won't start turning people away because then they wouldn't be ERs - they'd just be a doctor's office. That point aside, there's 2 good reasons why not to have universal healthcare here: If cheap community funded doctors weren't enough, then how will it be enough to literally increase the price of everything and then force people to pay it? A little counter intuitive, don't you think? Raise the price and force t…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:00 PM
1

I will admit that gov healthcare has worked, but I would not concede well. NHS doesn't make the top 10 in any ranking I've seen, so that's a lie. You being from australia means you don't understand US politics or the constitution. We will never have a PHC system because the constitution basically outright forbids it. Obamacare itself has had numerous constitutional challenges and it's still not done. This is why the ACA is the closest we will ever get, and it's absolute garbage. The only way is …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:43 PM
1

It's obvious that you don't know how healcare used to work up until maybe about the 80s. A lot of people belonged to a rotary type club, and part of that was basically community funded doctors. It wad cheap, effective, and could make house calls. Now basically that is illegal and for what? Get people coverage that could (mostly) already get covered? Putting the gov in charge doesn't make it any less "pay to live" all it does is either hide the costs in taxes or forces someone else to pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:50 AM
0

As opposed to the omniscient and omnipotent incentive of gov? Really?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:43 AM
2

People didn't pay into it because they couldn't afford it. Obamacare just forces everyone to pay for it.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:41 AM
2

So your position is that gov did not have a large role in healthcare before obamacare?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:58 AM
5

Gov fucked up healthcare, so the solution is to give them complete control?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:40 AM
13

Isn't a gentleman just a guy that is polite?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:00 AM
-5

Yes. Everything the kid does is my business. That's what being a parent means.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:38 PM
-5

It's about the principle of it not being your business.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:39 PM
-3

The same reason that minors can't consent to sex is only one aspect of why they can't consent to anything, one way or the other. Kids don't consent to eating green beans, but I'm going to make him anyway, don't don't try the consent argument. It's stale.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:31 PM
-1

At least they admit that fathers are only half of the problem.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:50 PM
5

True, but you can't really use google as a formal education on resumes.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:25 AM
6

If you actually read my comment, I did say that it is wrong to assume that about all men, but this is not one of those cases.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:56 AM
5

Fear, maybe, but irrational? From the comment, there was a gradual progression in creepiness. Text -> phone call -> date -> showing up at her work. All she did was take the progression to its logical conclusion. A MR issue would be if all progressions lead to a conclusion of rape.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:14 AM
1

Tolerated? Are you serious? Before you go spouting off some anecdotal evidence, consider that sexual predators usually have accompanied behavior of some kinds. Might not be obvious, might not be subtle, might not be universal. But to want women to disregard social cues is plain ignorant. I like the lion analogy: not every lion may eat me, but I don't want to be around any just in case. Another point is that this is not even a social trend. She's not saying all men are rapist pigs, she's saying t…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:08 AM
12

In no way is this a men's rights issue. There's no such thing as the right to expect others to be direct. Dude just can't socialize.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:55 AM
3

I'm hopeful. Mainly because empathy is a highly regarded trait. All people would really need to do is teach it to their kids.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:44 AM
6

I stereotype against lions because I don't want to get eaten or mauled.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:02 AM
2

Don't give up that easily!
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:33 AM
4

And that's relevant... how?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:55 AM
12

I agree completely. I think whoever feels this way is just frustrated because he only chases a particular kind of woman. The girl I'm seeing now is the complete opposite of all of those characteristics.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:54 AM
2

It's hard to feel strongly about the perspective that he presents. Firstly, he goes on for 30 minutes (although he is logically correct) about only one aspect of that first video (religious circular reasoning). Another thing is that he incorporates some "fuck"s and some other words into his arguments. Fuck, shit, bullshit - these are words of passion (where you try to express emotion for what you are speaking) which somewhat detracts from his logical argument. It's just not a very professional w…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:44 AM
2

The dude in that video is speaking incredibly fast for the amount of information he's trying to get across. I kept having to pause/rewind so I could think about what he's saying. Other than that, it's fairly sound philosophy.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:50 AM
1

On that point of subjective morality you bring up, the video stated that morality itself is not a culturally subjective concept. Different regions achieve different levels of morality at different rates. The argument for that is if a country still attributes famine with certain children being witches. This is not morally correct because it is an action or view founded on faulty information. Whereas some countries are morally developed so they can focus on things like environmental protections an…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:39 AM
8

I disagree. I think some people are easier to corrupt than others, I just don't think gender is really a factor.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:18 AM
17

I was abused by my mom way back when. I thought it was socially accepted.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:07 AM
1

A little late to the game, are we? I wouldn't really call it "flipping my lid" more so making my point is impossible without sounding like an asshole.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:28 AM
1

I kind of see what you're saying now. But it's not like some protesting is all of a sudden going to make a pharma company change its research funds. Business does whatever the fuck it wants, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:42 AM
-1

So... I'm supposed to make an argument about an article that wasn't posted, and I shouldn't click through to read? I don't think that's really fair.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 01:39 AM
1

Not really sure how this is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 01:08 AM
2

This is a silly article. Not in the sense that it's far-fetched, but in the sense that it has to be written at all. Yes, rape is a men's issue. Much like getting murdered is the murderer's fault. I'm not saying that all rapes are committed by men. Plus, what kind of question is "How do you prevent yourself from getting raped?" How do you prevent someone from murdering you? You could take all the measures in the world and I bet someone could eventually get a stab in if they really wanted to.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:34 AM
1

People are most offended by the things they are most insecure about. If they're insecure about their masculinity, they are offended by comments on masculinity. If they're insecure about having a big nose, they're going to be offended by comments on them having a big nose. In the case of "man up", there are only two options: man the fuck up and woman the fuck up. If you have a problem with manning the fuck up, I'll have no problem telling you to woman the fuck up. Unless there's a third option of…
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:18 AM
-1

So what you're saying is that out of a genuine context the statement can be taken the wrong way. News flash: that's with any statement, you fucking glittery unicorn hoof (It's a lot more intimidating when I say it in my head). Let's look at a few examples: A guy supports and provides for his child and/or wife: He's manning the fuck up A guy is taking verbal abuse from his girlfriend: He needs to man the fuck up A guy makes an important decision at work: He's manning the fuck up A woman supports …
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:06 AM
-4

Then that's a problem with you, not the statement. My advice? Don't get offended. You're just arguing a semantic problem rather than a civil rights problem. And last time I checked, men is a subset of human. If you're human and aren't willfully strong and determined, then man the fuck up. Or woman the fuck up if you'd rather hear that.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:35 PM
3

I'm probably going to get downvoted for this, but I take "man up" as a statement of being willfully strong and determined. The few women I work with (I'm in a very male dominated career field) I have no problem telling them to man up. If you're offended, man the fuck up. Even if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:27 PM
-4

Well if you were arguing against the article, you should have posted that instead of a picture of the headline.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 02:55 PM
-5

So the crux of their argument is that as women are becoming more successful in a professional environment, and want men to rise up to be equally successful in a same environment. Your response to that is "fuck that shit"? I don't see anything in the image relating to "marriage". You just see a men's rights issue just because you want to.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 01:52 PM
-11

That's kind of the problem. All I see is CNN telling a lot of guys to "stop being a lazy sack of shit." and maybe you should hear it, even if you don't want to or don't like it. Relevant
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:12 AM
3

Link to deleted post?
/r/MensRights25/06/11 08:16 AM
-10

So it's ok as long as it's done to us?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 11:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter