TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

armaadi Archive

View 5 posts and 1,864 comments by armaadi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,864 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
31

Repeat process with every woman who kills her husband. Run a study on DV and find mainly men killing women (only men getting charged with murder). Get public support for female victims of DV. Get laws passed that grant monies to women's causes. Must be nice to guarantee your way into public funding.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 04:11 PM
1

Some women* Just like some men have it better than women. If you look at the bottom of society, it is nearly 90% men. That doesn't change the fact that women have it worse than men across the board, thanks to rules, behaviors and actions implemented and exercised by men themselves. This is mind-numbing foolish and wrong. It's almost like it's a parroted statement from a gender studies class. Both men and women have contributed to how society is formed right now. To blame it only on men is to den…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:16 PM
5

Yeah, this article is about a hateful midandrist that tries to gatekeep feminism. In her mind, the struggle has to be hard and can only be done by other hateful misandrists like her. Capitalism has ruined her movement by solving many of women's problems precisely by providing products and services that benefit women. She's upset that no one ushered in a socialist utopia and she's upset women don't have near the same problems they used to have.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:20 AM
29

There's also the case of men never attempting as much because they are successful the first time, while women who are unsuccessful go on to try over and over. There's also the case of a "try" being a call for help than an actual try.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 11:49 AM
87

For men it is.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 04:41 PM
3

Too many people here don't understand the definition of toxic masculinity, know the history of feminist movements in history, Lol, feminists can't even agree on what it means. There's at least 4 definitions on the Wikipedia page about it. I think it's hilarious when some nobody on the internet claims they know the true definition of TM, when published authors and academic professors disagree with them, lol As for history of feminism? The problem isn't our lack of knowledge about feminism. We kno…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:34 PM
9

Feminists who engage in bad faith arguments and cling to debunked myths have issues here. Feminists who engage with an open mind and agree that men have issues get upvoted. They may get challenged on why they insist on being Feminists, but I've seen plenty have useful dialogues here without arguments devolving to insults.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 02:58 PM
43

Not quite, we also know women instigate DV more often than men in cases of reciprocal DV.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:59 PM
12

I'm sure it was also an assumption. It wouldn't be the first time a company does a gender neutral analysis and found that it was men who were mainly underpaid. Further, did the mom negotiate starting salary or did she perform the same? Did she rip into her boss for job evaluations she found to be unsatisfactory? My wife's bosses used to have to step up their game with their performance evaluations. If they said she was satisfactory, she was aak about 50 questions on what could be improved, if no…
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:19 PM
40

I'd she's truly a narcissist, you are unlikely to change her tune. She already believes your dad is the bad guy and she isn't claiming any responsibility for her own actions. You can only change people's minds if they are open to having their mind change. I had the wage gap argument with my sister, and she walked away still claiming 70 cents to the dollar myth after discussing why that data is severely flawed. Even after I pointed out her dreams of marrying a guy that can buy a big house with a …
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:42 PM
6

The diff is those girls had to have a pc back then and they could only use those programs if they were wherever that pc was. Now, the computer is in her pocket. To be fair, feminism has gotten worse over the years and probably has a decent influence on young women.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:06 AM
4

Was it feminists or social media? Used to, a woman (or man) could only compare herself to the women immediately around her. Now? She's comparing herself to only the best of what other women in the entire country show her. Just like dating. Used to, your options are what men or women you run into. Now your radius is how far you are willing to travel. While a stroll through the park is still acceptable, I suppose women these days feel they want something more or they feel someone who can provide m…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:00 PM
3

To many "equality" organizations, misandry doesn't exist. They consider men to be the oppressors, therefore, bigotry toward oppressors is expected and accepted. Basically if follows this: Misandry doesn't exist If it does, it's not that big of a deal. Even if it is a big deal, it's against oppressors so it's OK
/r/MensRights04/10/21 11:22 PM
1

Men just deal with being cut off, because it's expected to happen. Some times someone is being a dick, sometimes someone just didn't hear you. If getting cut off in a meeting is stopping you from achieving your goals, you weren't going to achieve them anyway. It's like feminists are trying to remove perseverance as a virtue for women.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:49 PM
5

Lol...they have tons of comments and only 43 comment karma. Not a lot of good takes from that one.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:46 PM
28

Women 100% should have advocation for issues they face. The problem is and has been that feminists from the start have advocated for privileges for women, not for equality. They have been misandrists from the start. They've denied privileges women already had and compared the lowliest women to only the highest status men. Now they claim they are for both men and women, while they deny male problems and lobby against men's rights. They use slander and character assassination to shut up anyone who…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 09:41 PM
7

TM itself is a dangerous term, especially with so many people with their hands in the definition. If it's harmful gender stereotypes, then women have a huge responsibility in perpetuating stereotypes. So users of the term pivot to harmful behaviors exhibited by men. But then, these behaviors aren't exclusive to men, so uses of TM pivot to behaviors that harm society. Again, since these behaviors aren't exclusive to men, users of TM pivot back to gender stereotypes. TM is just a cudgel feminists …
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:59 PM
44

It's a heavy mix of the women are wonderful effect, women viewing equality as hostile sexism, smear campaigns by feminists, and general apathy about men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:40 AM
2

And like a good feminist, she vanished like a fart in the wind when she's proven wrong. 10 to 1 odds she found a different person to argue at and claim DV is gendered and that men should just make their own shelters.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 05:20 PM
9

It's vague on purpose. If it was specific, then a solution could be proposed and once implemented, we can measure if the fix worked. But if it's vague...then the problem can persist indefinitely. Then they can keep blaming problems in society on TM and always be the people fighting for justice and equality. No feminist will give up their struggle. If they did, then they would be actually responsible for stuff.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:54 AM
36

TM is a catchall phrase. Look it up on Wikipedia. The entry there has four or five definitions of it. When people use it unironically, they are typically doing it to shut men up from talking about an issue. "OH that issue? That's due to toxic masculinity. We get rid of that and the issue is fixed." Yeah? We get rid of toxic masculinity and men will stop killing themselves from family courts stripping them of their children? From a society that doesn't give a damn about them? From suicide hotline…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:40 AM
12

They are another concern troll that swings by from time to time to make disingenuous arguments and make my soggy knee claims. No one here is upset at a woman's section. They are asking why their isn't a men's section. It would be like going into a building with only restrooms for women and when asking for a men's restroom, he shows up and says "what's wrong with having a women's restroom? Do you have a problem with women going to the restroom here? Why are you all mad that this place only has a …
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:59 PM
17

It isn't a safe space. They admitted it. If you post your traumas there, they will be viewed in a feminist light. If you post them here, it will be viewed in a neutral light. Since there is very little censorship here, you might get someone who is toxic, but it will unlikely and it will prob be downvoted. Posting there, it will be your fault either directly or indirectly, and masculinity will be blamed.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:20 PM
114

The Chuck Derry ama exposed exactly how menslib is different from mensrights. There is a reason he chose to do it on menslib and not here. From the feminist perspective, men aren't victims. They are perpetrators. If a woman is a perpetrator, it was actually in self defense from a man, and he still is at fault. What I found interesting was the number of men who pushed back on it....but then were very apologetic about it under fear of criticizing feminism. Menslib is not a safe space for men to ta…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 01:40 PM
1

All misandry is toxic
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:02 AM
2

I talked with my sister about this, and her response to Andrea Dworkins ideas of male genocide was, "that's just 1 feminist!" 1 feminist who has loads of followers, is quoted, is written about, is heralded as a feminist hero, is modeled after, is taught is schools, etc If she isn't a representation of feminism, why does the average feminist somehow think they are? You, Dworkin and Koss aren't feminists, but someone who no one knows is a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:00 AM
5

I've said it before, toxic masculinity means anything a feminist wants it to mean. I've been linked thr Wikipedia article and it even confirms this. It means certain behaviors men exhibit that are toxic, or behaviors men are expected to exhibit, or stereotypes about men, or anything bad that happens to or in society. With a definition so wide, feminists are never wrong when they call out TM, because it literally means anything. What it really is, is gender roles assigned to men that may be toxic…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:49 AM
269

They probably stared at her because she did turn her car on and did light them up with her headlights. She then stared at them as she drove by. I mean, I would be staring at this creepy woman as well. She wouldn't know they were looking unless she was eye fucking them the entire time. Headline: Woman terrified of men finds reason to be terrified of a group of men. Next up! Sports!
/r/MensRights27/09/21 12:56 PM
13

One that is heralded, quoted, used for sources, followed, written about, etc It's not just a feminist that stands on the corner in dirty rags screaming at cars. It's a prominent feminist that other feminists look up to, emulate, quote and follow.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:00 AM
37

She is coming face to face with the fact that change in society isn't a colorful, glorious revolution. It's a slow steady, one day at a time shuffle towards a goal. If she wants more powerful women in society, she has to be that powerful woman. Feminism told her to fight and smash the patriarchy, but feminism didn't tell her it would take millions of women doing boring ass office work for decades to shift the wage gap 5% more in women's favor. She was promised a battle and got a war or attrition…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:07 PM
4

Because to feminists, men hold all the societal power, so being misandrist has no real impact on men. Therefore, being misandrist or objectifying men isn't an issue. It doesn't matter if an individual man suffers; as long as men "control society", their suffering is unimportant and irrelevant and it's their fault anyway.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 07:30 PM
3

This is an academic answer. On the service it seems like you care about men's issues, but since you insist on using the toxic masculinity term, it's just bigotry. I mean, it doesn't matter who coined the term when the term is a catchall for whatever a feminist wants it to mean. In the wiki article, it is defined as gendered expectations for men, as harmful behaviors men are supposed to exhibit, as harmful behaviors men do exhibit. With such a wide definition, anything a man does or anything that…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:35 AM
5

Feminists love this term. It can be whatever they want it to mean. If a man cat calls a beautiful woman, it's toxic masculinity. If that same beautiful woman mocks a man for crying...its toxic masculinity. It's both a behavior that men exhibit and a gender expectation of men. This way, there is never, ever a push to fix toxic feminity, as all the toxic behaviors and gender expectations are masculine. In reality, it's a toxic gender expectation, so anyone who enforces that expectation, they are t…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:46 PM
2

Ironically, him knowing you have his back can increase his confidence and in turn, get him closer to what a "real man" is.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:38 PM
4

Do it anyway
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:37 PM
6

Because it's a garbage term. Like, if we said women need to fix their toxic feminity in order to address slut shaming, seeing as its a societal expectation of women to be pure, it would seem like we are blaming women for societal expectations of them. Women shaming men for crying is toxic masculinity? You are inherently victim blaming here, for what women are doing. People who unironically use toxic masculinity have nearly always been just closeted or even outright misandrists. All men's problem…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:36 PM
41

I usually point out all the shaming language and fallacies. They typically use a bunch of claims when they insult you so you have to defend against multiple attacks. Just call them out for shaming language, gas lighting, Motte and Bailey, no true scotsman, strawman, etc. I've had a few where I quote their fallacies and at the end you realize they didn't even have an argument outside of personal attacks.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:25 PM
15

After thinking a out this, 10 to 1 odds she found the r/FDS sub and bought into it.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:25 PM
226

And then she just said "Well it's not the same, you got raped by another man, and it's men who are causing this problem, so it's just men attacking other men" Yoooooooooooooooo That was her response to you getting raped? Zero empathy? Nope. Sorry, she's done. She is pre judging you based on your gender and she has no empathy for you, also based on your gender. She feels her emotions and problems are priority...you might be dealing with a narcisist or a sociopath who is hiding under the guise of …
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:07 PM
13

I find it sad so many people just dismiss the husband's feelings here. We have 1...we also lost one. It took us years to get premiers. That was a lot of emotion for that first pos preg test. Reddit thinks a guy is supposed to be a stone wall or something.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:35 PM
20

"OH you found a pos preg test? It's not mine." Uh...thats it? Reddit: such clear communication!
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:17 PM
11

"You want a mens shelter? Start one! You want mens advocacy? Start it! Make a hashtag, start a social media campaign!" Yeah, your shelters gets billions from the government. You want to start a women's shelter? The gov will literally help you out. People will donate. You want to start a men's shelter? People don't want that in their back yard. You won't get shit from the government. There's no resources that will refer abused men to you...they ignore abused men or tell them to stop hitting their…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:28 PM
5

You could just take it a step further and say misogyny is rooted in minsandry, with men hating women because of women's innate hatred of men. It's the same amount of nonsense, just using the same argument and taking it ffurther. How would dismantling misogyny make anything better for men? Let's do a thought exercise. We snap our fingers and misogyny is gone. Family courts still favor women. The draft is still there and favors women by not sending them to die. The sentencing gap remains, because …
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:10 PM
1

This shouldn't be downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 11:18 AM
4

In areas with arranged marriages, both the woman and man are married pretty much whether they want to or not. Now, they both get a say in who they marry, but there isn't an unlimited amount of options and you will be married.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 06:09 PM
2

How is your group working towards real equality, and can you define what you mean when you say real equality?
/r/MensRights19/09/21 11:49 AM
3

You mean feminists with no political power might be working towards a true equality goal. The ones with power, the ones in education...they very much dismiss male victims of rape and dismiss any troubles men might have. Mary Koss has been the de facto "expert" on rape for decades and feels its inappropriate for men to be labeled victims of rape. She designed our current rape laws that say rape is only being penetrated, thus excluding men being raped by women via forced to penetrate. National Org…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 11:48 AM
7

Why do feminists hate men? Don't know. Why does anyone hate anyone? That's the big question. That's the question from the beginning. Why did feminist chant "votes for women, chastity for men"? Why did they hand out white feathers to shame men into fighting in ww2? Why did they advocate to drop the male population to 10% of what it is? Why do feminists today deny mgm as a problem, male rape victims, male dv victims? Today, their bank accounts depend on it. Feminist professors depend on women only…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 03:28 AM
12

Someone had to hurt me for feminists to lie about domestic violence?
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:36 PM
1

8 in 8 years? Wow. Now do you have any evidence they did this specifically because they were incels? Didn't the Plymouth guy have loads of psychological problems before hand? Imagine if women did this to males? lol You mean no one would care and they would show how these women were abused and have past trauma that led to this or claim all the victims were abusive towards her? Men get killed in mass killings all the time and most of the time, no one cares.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 12:49 PM
18

Because it's a feminist myth that domestic violence is gendered and that women only kill their partners in self defense. Feminists do or say something that is based on a lie and lobby for change based on this lie MRAs shine a light on the lie You: MRAs are creepy I see this pattern all over from people who are more willing to except a lie than face the truth.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 12:41 PM
8

Check out ama's with domestic violence counselors. They outright call DV something a man does to a woman, they deny men service and refer them to "other" services and "assume" they get care there. Those that work at shelters deny men shelter and boys over 15. 16 year old boy that gets abused? Oh well. No where to go. But a 16 year old gear? Maybe his twin sister? She's allowed to stay.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:46 PM
4

Lol yeah "We started investigation only right wing extremists and found that investigations of right wing extremists increased!" Uh no shit?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 06:43 PM
3

Even in this article, they pointed to two instances of an incel killing people. Once this year once in 2018. Wow, what a dangerous community. 2 instances of people violent in 3 years. And likely, there were far more problems with both of those men than merely being incel. But, society doesn't want to face responsibility for being harsh and unforgiving to men who don't fit any particular mold...they'd rather scapegoat the problem away. It's guns! It's incel community! It's anything that doesn't p…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 06:41 PM
5

Then there's the taboo of paying for sex on top of all that. "You can only get laid if you pay for it" isn't much better than "you can't get laid"
/r/MensRights16/09/21 06:35 PM
4

Also, when were women not allowed to go to work? Women haven't been banned from work ever. Besides, being denied occupation isnt the same as being denied from being forced to go fight for a country.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:45 PM
5

You already did, but to a feminist, everything that happens to a woman, either positive or negative, is oppression. That way they can maintain their stance on what the patriarchy is. If men are forced to get drafted and that is evidence against a patriarchy, they have to spin this as something that is actually oppressing women. If women but not men were forced to sign up for the draft, that would be oppression. If women and men were forced to sign up, it would still be oppression since women sho…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:40 PM
9

Yes, ignore her and don't hang around her. Whatever room she is in, leave. If she comes into a room, put in ear buds and listen to something to tune her out. If you are at s dinner table, don't engage with her. If she insists, tell "you said you use me. Why should I talk with you?"
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:17 PM
22

Don't engage with her and don't hang around her. If she doesn't need a "man", then don't be around her. If she says all men are pigs, then tell her you wouldn't want her to hang around a pig and leave. If she gets your parents involved, tell them you don't feel comfortable being around someone who thinks you are a pig and thinks it's OK to curse at you. She is still young and this feminist identity is everything to her right now. If you debunk her, she will react emotionally because you are chal…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:14 PM
28

Prob not, because like many misandrists, they don't think misandry exists. And if it does, it doesn't get men killed. And if it does, it's other men doing it. And even if it's a woman who kills a man, he probably did something to trigger her. Even if he didn't, some other man did. Even if....etc, you get the idea.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 04:05 PM
24

Your question puts all the blame on male lawmakers.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:47 PM
26

Are you saying women have zero political and social power and only men are to blame for societal's ills?
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:16 PM
-1

700 deaths out of over 3m births in the US. So, yes you can die in child birth and it is tragic, it's extremely unlikely.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:04 PM
1

We place all sorts of limits on what people can and can’t do with their bodies. My body my choice is a myth. Which means this is an out. The core argument of abortion, is a woman purely wanting to end her pregnancy if she wants to. It's not about bodily autonomy, as it's easily proven there's already restrictions on it. It's not about a life, because even if you prove life starts at conception, the pro-abortion side will still say it's her choice. This is about women having the right to opt out …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:22 PM
1

That went places...but yeah, capture and release outside.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 12:18 PM
4

So your argument is that you are a bigot but it's OK because you think your bigotry isn't as bad as other bigotry?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:53 PM
5

mis·an·dry /miˈsandrē/ noun dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). "poorly disguised misandry" You said you hate all men, that's misandry.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:40 PM
6

I hate all men babe* not some. There we go. Pure misandry drives this bigot.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:36 PM
2

The person I replied to initially stated that "the majority of abortions are because women want to be whores". Then, your dumb ass chimed in with your link. Because you made a dumbass claim. Don't make dumbass claims, don't get called out. The rest is not worth replying to.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 06:54 PM
2

you are not being forthcoming in your representation of the study you linked. Lol, what are you talking about? Your quotes still show most abortions are not due to sexual assault. You are wrong. "Being a whore" is hardly behind the reasoning here. Who made that claim? It is more like "not seeing the responsibility in bringing a child into the world given my current situation". Right, so it's not "sexual assault", is it? And before you say "she shouldn't be having sex" or "should've used protecti…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 04:15 PM
1

It’s not “shaming”. You just can’t accept what you are. I never said you were, just that you come across as such. You are a liar. You got called our for your attacks, that voluntarily made, because your argument sucked. You speak as if women are evil because they want the same freedom over their healthcare choices as men. When did I say they were evil? Men don't have these same choices, though. This is an extra choice women get to make above and beyond what men have. Pro-choice love making the a…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:42 PM
2

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. For my wife, her first round she only knew about 4 or 5 weeks in when she was very late and took a test. If it's a woman's first time and her cycle is routinely out of wack...she may not notice until 6 weeks. Now, second pregnancy, she knew like 2 weeks in.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:22 PM
1

Used to a woman was limited to her social circle. Now? It's as large as she wants it to be. You aren't competing with the local eligible bachelors, you are competing with 100, 200 square miles of bachelors, and all of them are messaging her, and you have to capture her attention within 100s of matches. Why would a mid 20s woman go hang out with a guy that just started his career or hasn't yet when there's a guy who already has his career sorted and has a house and a nice car, etc? I feel bad for…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:13 PM
3

https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2005/reasons-us-women-have-abortions-quantitative-and-qualitative-perspectives Near 75% are due to not wanting a child at that point in their lives or can't afford a baby. Why did you think it was due to sexual assault?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:42 PM
1

It’s not “shaming”. You just can’t accept what you are. Not an incel, tho. This is just low iq shaming language typically feminists use to try to shut down debate. This means you are admitting your arguments can't stand on their own, so you shift the argument from the original subject onto whether or not someone else can get laid. How sad of a tactic is this. Hypocrisy? There’s zero hypocrisy in that quote. It’s a statement of fact that the “my body, my choice” movement is to protect women from …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:40 PM
3

Except it's not the same as dialysis, is it?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:25 PM
5

You come across as an incel that just wants to push his little hate-filled agenda because he has too small of an understanding of what is going on. Shaming language. "My body, my choice" is about healthcare decisions that affect the person, not the society around the person and you and everyone else trying to equate the two situations know very well that is the reality, you just jump on anything you can to make it political. Hypocrisy When you make something like abortion illegal, you say that A…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:17 PM
7

Majority are due to convenience not sexual assault
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:14 PM
11

right, but what I mean is that women vote for who they want to represent them. These people are assuming its men picking who is making these policies, and it's really both. If women are the largest voting block, they have the biggest voice, ergo, they chose these politicians to do this. Putting this all on men is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:47 AM
17

And with women being the largest voting block, it's mainly women who voted those men into power.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:53 PM
2

A man shouldn't have to fight tooth and nail to get to see his children. A 50 50 starting point resolves this. If he needs to negotiate down, that's fine. It shouldn't be somewhere where he rips up his 401k just to have an opportunity to visit. As for unworkable being the default, it already is the default for men.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:23 PM
2

Feminists can never solve the problems for women, because if they did, they would swiftly run out of usefulness. Their "patriarchy", merely by existing, keeps them employed.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 05:43 PM
2

Because what OP did was obviously a response to the sexism against him. You didn't condemn it, you just fussed about the karensplaining and sexism against women. OP never would have used this term without his SO being sexist.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:01 PM
7

Yet you tacitly condone sexism against men and are only seemingly upset when it's reciprocated.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:31 PM
26

It doesn't matter even he was the same age. If she is willing to beat and to threaten to tell people on him, he could be forced into compliance. He may not be willing to fight back, so even if he was bigger than her, she could still force him to watch movies and have sex with her.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 01:14 PM
23

They admit it. I talked with one rhe other day, and they admit that sweeping generalizations about men is fine, but generalizations about women is wrong. They see no issues with thus hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 12:55 AM
3

That's Mott and Bailey. You haven't convinced me to whatever it is you want, I'm not going to join feminism. So no, you haven't done anything effective.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 01:19 AM
2

Highly effective by pushing people away from feminism and pro-choice movements? Being hateful and irrational doesn't attract members.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 01:01 AM
1

Did women really think men weren't interested in feeling desired? I think a lot of people just didn't care whether or not men felt desired. As with a lot of things, men's desires or emotions or well being just don't register as a thing to care about in society. So its not a case of women actively thinking men aren't interested in that sort of thing, it's that whether or not he's interested isn't a thought that occurs to most women. It's more apathy than sinister.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:40 AM
7

Why do you hope? Why do you want harassment to include 1 time situations?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:39 AM
6

It's not harassment unless it's repeated and unwanted. If it's a one time deal made by 1 guy you never saw again, it's not harrassment.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:02 AM
120

I think number 1 is huge. Being a partner in a marriage is work. Beyond that, you have to change how you communicate. You can't just go off on your husband on every little thing or your marriage will crumble. You can't shut down and up and leave when things get tough. Your high school/college boyfriend? You can tell him to eff off and the relationship is over. Your husband? Uh no. You have to stay and communicate, AND you have to communicate in a way that after the argument is over, you still li…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:46 PM
4

It's gas lighting and shaming. If you swap "men" with other demographics and it sounds like a horrifically bigoted statement, the statement is bigoted. Just because the target is men doesn't mean the statement isn't garbage. If the statement said "women" AHS would make three more posts screaming about muh soggy knees, feminism would get there "scholars" to update Wikipedia entries, 2x would have a massive cry fest, so I guess just a normal day for them...you get the picture. It's outright misand…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:15 PM
3

Look, AHS, if you actually want to talk, then talk. Running away to your hate sub that heavily censors anything revolving men's rights, that just makes you a coward.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:50 PM
2

If fds and twox are allowed, then mgtow should be allowed as well, simple as that.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 02:51 PM
4

So? I bet they came to politics, news, feminism, pics, etc as well. You wanna ban a sub because someone who did bad things visited it once and left? Get real.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:23 PM
3

There was only 1 post the Plymouth shooter .add and it wasn't outright misogyny. Secondly, feminists bar for misogyny is literally anything they want it to be, so that doesn't mean anything. But they don't really. We see when racist/sexist communities removed they usually try and reform on another site. But the participation almost always dramatically decreases. Take a look at the incel community for one. And how do you know they don't radicalize? It seems like you are making excuses to ban men'…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:22 PM
17

It's only obvious if you have zero clue as to what any of those subs are about and just parrot what hostile subs tell you about them. What could we do? Seriously. Downvote them? We do that. Ban them? Ok well they just go somewhere else and radicalize there. Also banning harms the open discourse we have here. If we banned people like feminist subs, you would have been banned a long time ago.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 03:42 AM
21

1 posts months ago and apparently got obliterated in the comments. So 1 post and 5 comments and somehow we're to blame? K.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 03:38 AM
27

It's FDS... They refer to men as scrotes. You can't take anything seriously from that sub. There is no dating strategy there, it's misandrists that run a hateful echo chamber and anyone posting or commenting there is 99% delusional.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 11:46 PM
1

Lots of women like cuddling and holding hands and all that affection. If she doesn't and you do, you may need to find a woman who does. You do not want to be in a relationship when you want physical affection beyond sex, and it never comes. Furthermore, she seems dismissive of your desires and she's shaming you for your hormones and sex drive? Ok. There seems to be a lack of empathy going on with this girl. I would look for greener pastures. I understand you got a bite and you want to reel this …
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:30 PM
5

How specifically is this incel talking?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:39 PM
10

Or worse, guys that look like they are unsuccessful with girls will be noted and reported for "incel" behavior. And what will this do to those guys? Be lectured about sucking at talking with women? Wow, that will build confidence. Be suspended or removed if they can't get a date? This is so stupid.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:11 PM
14

Furthermore, if you are punching up, that's not much incentive for me to do anything to help you. It means that once you attain power, you will keep punching. Punching up is what cowards do, because they hide behind their "victim" status to avoid getting punched back.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:21 PM
22

Not any more resources than oppressing women, tho right? A bullet is cheap. Convincing men to get on board with the Taliban regime is expensive and time consuming.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 09:41 PM
3

Imo, family courts have been one of the worst. When an ex wishes you to have a bad time, she will involve the courts in any way she sees fit and you will have a bad time.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 12:40 PM
2

Absolutely good to investigate this. I remember when aus feminists were trying to convince Aus senate of the wage gap and admitted they used broad statistics and didn't even bother with hours worked. Without pushback, their claim would have stood unchallenged.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 01:23 PM
1

Never said it was bad. But go off I guess. My argument is that the left leaning people there have created an echo chamber by automatically downvoting and insulting anyone that doesn't fit their left leaning ideals. I would have the same problem with a right leaning sub. The logic that left-leaning = bad is exactly why you guys get ignored as hateful or misogynist, because it seems like you're more interested in opposing women than advancing yourselves. No it's because morons like you have terrib…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 04:00 PM
11

I think it might have been age restricted due to the 1s worth of boobs shown in the intro.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:02 PM
67

I'm kinda impressed with the number of people calling this out for help stupid it is and calling out the people claiming a utopia would arise.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 02:54 AM
3

AHS lies all the time, lol They call this a misogynist hate sub, that's a lie. They call this just an incel sub, that's a lie They say we spread hatred of women, that's a lie They say we think men have no rights, that's a lie Their last post was pretty much an entire post of lies. They lied about mgtow2 to get it banned and blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:26 AM
6

They are echo chambers. Post anything that doesn't fit the left leaning ideals in pics or news or politics and you will get shredded. There is no wiggle room there. They are outright hateful to anything not in their world view.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:23 AM
7

Then we should ban 2x, fds, feminism, askfeminist, science, news, pics, literally every single sub.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:22 PM
6

But if they are willing to lie to get a sub banned, then they'll lie about any sub. I've seen a few brand new accounts posting straight up hate towards women with like 40 downvotes. How much we betting they are accounts from AHS members trying to post crap to screen shot to use as proof? Mgtow may have been toxic, but that doesn't mean you have to lie about it.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:13 PM
9

When an Australian college offered a scholarship for boys it was labeled as misogynist. You can't have a male only group without it being shamed.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:05 PM
2

So why can't you be racist to white people? Even if the etymology of the word "race" is true, that doesn't explain why you can't be racist to black people. IE, just because black people invented jazz doesn't mean white people can't play it. Or just because Arabs invented the concept of zero doesn't mean white people can't count to 20. So even if white people invented the concept of race and even if it started in Europe, it doesn't mean other "races" could not take that concept and use it against…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:44 PM
20

Lol, this is racist. White people\fair skin people didn't invent racism. This is obnoxious. Every group of people were tribalistic based on nearly every reason and racism grew from that. It was hardly a thing that white people started. Furthermore, even if it was, it doesn't change the fact that you can be racist towards white people today. I'm sure people will be convinced by your pre written pile of bullshit, but I'm not. I'm also sure a bunch of professional race baiting racists can produce a…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:21 AM
29

No it's racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:01 AM
1

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html Excerpt Sexual Violence: 87% of male victims of (completed or attempted) rape reported only male perpetrators. 79% of male victims of being MTP reported only female perpetrators. 82% of male victims of sexual coercion reported only female perpetrators. 53% of male victims of unwanted sexual contact reported only female perpetrators. 48% of male victims of lifetime non-contact unwanted sexual experiences repo…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:08 PM
1

When you redefine rape to exclude men, then don't be surprised when men are not listed in rape statistics. This sub is true incel territory Feminist shaming language.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:36 PM
29

Or younger women liking older guys. I had a friend that dated a 19 year old when he was 30. She was fully consenting, she wasn't tricked into anything, there was no grooming. What's he supposed to say, "no, sorry but you are just too immature, even though you have a professional job ready and manage finances better than me?"
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:26 PM
64

Asking for nuance = silencing to a feminist...um ok
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:24 PM
2

No they don't, stop lying. We doubt that every single woman is harassed and we question what feminists consider harassment. Get off your misogyny You don't know the meaning of that word.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:53 PM
14

Who is justifying it? Finding out why rapes happen and look for ways to possibly stop rapists from wver raping anyone is a good thing.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:47 PM
2

Your first link shows that a huge number of men also get harassed. But you know, go off on your gynocentricism
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:25 PM
17

Men need to attempt to put their ego to the side and give compassionate care. If you struggle to put your ego to the side, then spend some time with yourself finding the source of your defensiveness. This is textbook gas lighting. You don't get to blame all men and then tell them they can't be defensive about your claims. Like, imagine if we questioned women on what they wore when they were raped, and then told them to put their ego aside and question where their defensiveness came from. How hor…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:44 PM
31

Feminists believe that boys and men are just defective girls and women. If they give up societal power and cry and defer to women 100% of the time, then feminists can usher in their utopia.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:37 PM
21

Ah, there's the feminist shaming language. agree with me or I assume you never get laid! "Feminists are here to smash the patriarchy and eliminate gender expextations....but lol, I will totally reforce gender expectations by making fun of every man's sexlife!"
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:08 AM
13

God this is so adorable because you immediately jumped into the assumption train. All I said was men aren't persecuted, which is a fact. You are the one that brought up male politicians as if that proved that men aren't oppressed. If those male politicians are advocating for this that women want and for policies that benefit women, then women aren't oppressed either, because they have all the representation they need in the men that pass laws for them. Go check out some of the most recent aborti…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:02 AM
14

Then why did you say they were for equal rights when they clearly weren't? Little to no sexual autonomy? That's very misogynist of you. Part of what feminists want to do in dismantling the patriarchy is improve the lived of men who are affected by it This isn't true by their actions, tho, is it? Prominent feminists have endorsed the idea of eliminating men down to 10% of the population. Prominent feminists today still insist DV is something men do to women despite it being roughly equal between …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:52 AM
14

Because the term places the blame of toxicity on masculinity at the surface and intrinsically links that toxicity to masculinity, IE, if a woman is doing this shaming, it's still referred to as toxic masculinity. Well slut shaming occurs by both men and women, that's a bit more of a symptom of the patriarchy but I see your point. Shaming men for having feelings is also done by men and women, yet you have no problems using toxic masculinity, so why wouldn't you accept the term toxic feminity to d…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:45 AM
12

I mean, do you think feminists in the US are whiners when women in the Middle East are being raped, sold and killed? Like, do we have to stop every single movement on the planet until every single rape in the middle east stops? That seems....foolish.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:16 AM
22

Men aren’t raped as often as women. Because a feminist pushed rge narrative that men can't be raped. The CDC did a study on made to penetrate and found that while not as common as women being raped, men were raped nearly as much and reported women as the perpetrator like 87% of the time. Women even admitting to using coercion and force to make a man have sex with them. Men don’t have to fear for their lives every time they go out. And yet 9 times out of 10, it will me men are are the victims of …
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:10 AM
16

Then stop using a term that feminists use to shame men and masculinity. There is no such thing as toxic masculinity, it's merely harmful gender expectations. Any actual behaviors that are attributed to masculinity are exhibited by both sexes. If we talk about actual gender expectations of what it means to be masculine, IE, men don't cry, then toxic masculinity as a phrase is victim blaming. For example, if we call slut shaming "toxic feminity" due to the harmful gender expectations of women to b…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:57 PM
9

Now do the bottom of society. It is a typical tactic of feminists to use the apex fallacy to make a point about how great men are doing. They talk about the glass ceiling, yet never mention the stainless steal cellar that keeps women from the bottom. If you looked at those political seats and see how often women win those seats compared to how often they run, you will find they win ar the same rate they run, ergo, there is no secret society keeping women out of politics. Furthermore, you are ass…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:52 PM
19

Not in the entirety of its history has it been for equal rights. It has only even been about women's rights.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:41 PM
8

We allow egalitarian views to exist, women's rights that don't trample on men's rights and men's rights that don't trample on women's rights. We are highly critical of feminism. You are more than welcome to stay and learn. Contrast this to nearly any feminist sub that will ban you for questioning them, this sub is one of the few that is actually inclusive. You may get some downvotes, but as long as you aren't being an outright ass, you won't be banned.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:39 PM
19

That random feminists on the internet with no political or institutional power aren't real feminists, the feminists with political and institutional power are the real feminists. So when you say that misandry isn't part of real feminism, you are wrong. Your brand of feminism isn't the real feminist. If you actually believe in equality of the sexes, you are an egalitarian, not a feminism. If you insist on being called a feminist and insist on using feminist language, then we will call you what yo…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:36 PM
4

They are moral fascists.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 10:12 AM
4

They act like it's a zero sum game where only one can be on bc. They also act like bc never works when it comes to abortion rights, so have a pill for men would be good news for them, theoretically.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:56 AM
8

Men are ABSOLUTELY more unreliable than women. Which is why the article even mentioned they cannot be trusted to take the pill. They have not had to have any responsibilities especially in terms of caring for or the principle of what they do to someone else’s body. You really sound like the “not all men” guy when men are far above and beyond abusers, serial killers, murderers and rapists per capita. Statistically proven so. And men claiming women aren’t funny is an outdated opinion, the instabil…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:06 AM
1

Their response is more than "there's no problem". There response is "there's no problem, but if there is, it's not our fault, it's yours. If you disagree, you just hate women and can't get laid. Once we destroy all of the patriarchy, then we can maybe take a look at your problems."
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:25 PM
7

We don't call 2x misandrist for opening up about their experiences. We call 2x misandrist for them slandering all men as this evil oppressive force and how shitty we all are. They bitch about mgtow or pusspass or pussypassdenied having misogynist comments when they vent about women, but allow 2x to do the exact same thing. Hypocrisy at its finest, complete with an overt feminist mod who bans anyone who disagrees.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:29 PM
2

Do you think feminists think any of your examples are things a woman could never do??? This is baffling. Women can do all of these things. And yet, feminists insist that it's men who are the patriachy, which means that no, they don't believe women do those things. No one ever claimed a woman, in general, not getting promoted is 'the patriarchy' or even sexism. Lots of PEOPLE don't get promotions. When a woman is the best candidate but not promoted because 'maybe she'll get pregnant later and I d…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:47 AM
6

From menslib, apparently it got banned for inactive mods. FDS isn't any better than the "evidence" posted here, but I bet their mods are all over the place banning people left and right. Further, FDS is pro feminism and MGTOW anti.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 11:41 PM
1

You don't know how feminists use and define patriachy. Try again with a real argument. this comment makes me feel like your only issue with the word 'patriarchy' is the fact that patriarchs have historically been male No my problem is that the description of patriachy in the way feminists define and use the term doesn't reflect reality and fails to describe why women hold so many advantages. When feminists claim that a man does something they think a woman could never do, regardless of if he's h…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 05:25 PM
2

I'm using the term in the way that it is defined and used. It's feminists who use the term in whatever way is convenient to then. I can understand how the term can sound alienating but people are merely talking about a societal system, not implying that every man has a charmed life by virtue of being male. Then stop using it. You use a shaming term, and then tell people they are just ignorant if they get upset by you using this term. Do you think because systemic racism exists that means that ev…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:04 PM
6

They also use incel quite a bit, while not body shaming, it's still shaming language.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:03 PM
5

Because if it's harmful to men, it ain't a patriarchy, which means it's victim blaming. What feminists are doing is saying that maybe men have issues, but it's all their fault anyway.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:59 PM
4

No but it is feminists' fault seeing as they (Mary Koss) has been the driving force behind defining rape in modern society for decades, and it has been her and anyone who defers to her that has excluded male victims of rape. When policy is changed to exclude men, and people follow that policy, then men don't view women raping men as a real thing.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:52 PM
3

No, people can still come for you for this, regardless of whether or not you sexually assaulted anyone. That's what a false claim is.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:48 AM
13

My response would be to gather as much evidence that this happened immediately so I could confront him or the school. Your response is to blindly believe any woman who makes any claim anywhere. I heard from a lady that you groped her. I guess you need to go to jail, right?
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:34 AM
7

Except in this case you are on the side of the murderers of Till.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:32 AM
18

Lol@ the comment about being unaware of privilege. Even the most woke woman or POC or LGBT won't recognize their own privilege. Women get preferred treatment near universally. A doctor believing you? What? Doctors have a bad habit of not believing lots of people. An extra cookie? Lol, try not being a complete ass to people and you might get a free cookie, too. And this is what happens when people see statistics and make broad assumptions on those statistics...just like the bigoted eugenic suppor…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:23 AM
7

Yup. Point out the shaming language. "Whatever you are just an incel" "A. That's not an argument and B. That's shaming language you are using presumably to shut me up. Beat me on merit not on insults."
/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:45 PM
9

I think there's an issue with dating apps as well. Used to, women's options were the men around them, so if women wanted to date, they had to pick from what was available. Now with a dating app, she has 10s of thousands of options in her pocket. She gets hundreds to thousands of messages a week. If she wants to narrow this list of potential suitors she has to implement arbitrary standards, IE, 6ft or taller, makes certain amount of money, looks a certain way, etc. Honestly, I don't blame them. H…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 03:36 PM
105

Most people who lack respect for feminism have failed to understand or even adequately research it. The rest just hate women. So yeah, your comment isn't particularly inspirational. Akksually.... People who are critical of feminism have adequately researched it, and they have found how misandry runs through the core of feminism from the very start. This isn't the case where feminists have accidently done things that hurt men. This is the case of feminism being outright hateful and bigoted agains…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:29 PM
6

In a strip club with women strippers? A dude bigger than you removes you from the club with very little interest in whether or not you survive the removal. Note: if you are big, they will get more big dudes to make sure of your removal.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 01:16 AM
5

While technically true, women skate by in the justice system constantly, so guilty women already walk free.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 07:53 PM
3

80% sure this is sarcasm. To be fair, this is exactly what they are asking for, so who knows.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:14 AM
8

Or definitions. It could be argued that this is why they have such loose standards for defining their terms, as they can't be held to any consistent standard. Take toxic masculinity. It means anything a feminist wants it to mean at any time, but really, it's gender expectations of men. Of men. Which means, slut shaming isn't toxic masculinity, since it isn't a gender expectation of men, it's gender expectations of women, ergo, slut shaming would actually be toxic feminity if the logic was consis…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:09 AM
5

How long have CEOs existed? Why didn't you post how women couldn't be cyber security engineers until the 1990s? That's discrimination right? Or how women couldn't be astronauts until the 1900s...how sexist society was that we didn't let women go to outer space until the 1900s.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:24 AM
6

A law is passed that either makes an allowance or bans discrimination, so like all feminists, throwaway assumes that women didn't have the right, at all, before or were universally barred from whatever. It wouldn't shock me if feminists thought violence against women was totally legal until the Violence Against Women Act was passed in the 90s.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 11:47 PM
5

I mean, I'm happy about the amount of people who disagrees with him. The issue I have is that this dude is a mod of 900 subs and not only holds these views but enforces them. When reported, reddit believes he does nothing wrong. That's the problem. Reddit as a company condones misandry but dismissing it when it happens and retaining people with these views and giving these people power of vast amounts of it's content. Like, if a user made this comment, well reddit has no real control over it. Pe…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 04:25 PM
3

I replied elsewhere, if you know who it is, that's fine, but I'm not going to out them.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:54 AM
7

No, but the fear of anything a man says that could be seen as a catcall could keep men from talking to women at all anywhere, which would lead to a lot of unforeseen consequences. The metoo movement pushed men and women apart in the work environment, which lead to fewer opportunities for women and fewer mentors for women. Men stopped inviting women out to social gatherings and stopped one on one's with them. If every interaction with a woman carries a risk of criminal punishment, men will simple…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:49 AM
0

How do you think women and by extension, society should deal with it? What is the punishment, and how much resources are you willing to devote to this? How big of a problem even is this?
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:08 AM
30

If you know that's fine, but I'm not gonna catch flak for outing people.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:28 PM
5

i'm a bit hesitant to do the 'if the roles were reversed' thing. only because misandry and misogyny apply to slightly different concepts. Why are you hesitant? How are these different concepts? for instance saying 'ah men are so irrational' does not hold the same weight as 'ah women are so irrational' the second phrase would be speaking to over-used stereotypes about women but switching them out wouldn't make it misandry. But people do say 'men are pigs' and 'men are just angry' or whatever pret…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:25 PM
16

also it's a bit...impossible (?) to have 'ingrained' prejudice against men but that's another topic completely that we can discuss if you'd like. How is it impossible? i don't think it would be beneficial for anyone to make blanket statements on what is offensive Bro it's clearly an anti male statement. I mean, you have lots of explanations of stuff unrelated to this topic, but what it boils down to is a mod making an anti-male statement and pinning it. It seems like you have a problem, not with…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 07:19 PM
25

mis·an·dry /miˈsandrē/ noun dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). Saying that men shouldn't be in charge of anything is clearly prejudice against men and contempt for men. If this was about women not being in charge of anything, it would obviously be misogyny, or if it was about black people, racist. The point of this is to show clear cut cases of misandry and how acceptable many people find this. This is a mod, who pinned their comment to the top of a…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 06:21 PM
116

Which is kinda bad, that not only does reddit not view this as hateful, but they protect and retain people who share these hateful views.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:26 PM
466

Rule 1 of reddit "Remember the human. Reddit is a place for creating community and belonging, not for attacking marginalized or vulnerable groups of people. Everyone has a right to use Reddit free of harassment, bullying, and threats of violence. Communities and users that incite violence or that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned." Telling people that men shouldn't be in charge of anything and then using your mod privilage to sticky your comment att he top apparently…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 03:14 PM
12

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwib5rq6nfTxAhXKWM0KHYFlCJgQFjABegQIBBAC&usg=AOvVaw3QKdIPe9DOT1VAeT-vnEkp Women view benevolent sexism as equality and egalitarian views as hostile sexism. Feminism takes this to the extreme. Therefore, every single feminist group will view equality as a society that heavily favors women. There is no chance of equality as long as feminism defines equality and has the reigns to society.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 01:09 PM
6

Well, is there anything being done to address homelessness for men? No, but there is for women, even though they make up 25% of the homeless population... There is nothing being done about men who experience DV and there is no government support for those men. DV is still framed as something men do to women, and rape is still framed in the same way. Family courts are still biased heavily against men. Men are losing ground in school, and schools are 100% fine with this. There isn't any going forw…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:07 AM
3

Equity is a dystopian wish. The only way to force equity is massive amounts of government power, and that government will make sure everyone is at one level, poor and voiceless. Equality of opportunity is far superior to equity. It involves choice and it keeps governments in check.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:00 AM
0

Lol, no it isn't. I'll concede that those who don't fight don't have the same stakes, but those that do fight have the real stakes. So especially in the US where the chance of facing attacks from a foreign country is near zero, those that don't have a stake in putting their own lives on the line shouldn't have the same say as those that do.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 08:21 PM
4

I have a huge problem with people who have no stake in the war, voting on said war. If women shouldn't be drafted, they shouldn't have a say if the country goes to war, right? This is like voting on who your neighbor has to fight, all the while being exempt from fighting yourself. I understand the logistics, but if women faced that underlying threat of violence men face, they might make different decisions on who they vote for.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:16 PM
1

They are?
/r/MensRights20/07/21 07:11 PM
22

Because it shouldn't be this way. A guy should be able to own his own things without fear of someone taking them, be it a person of ill intent or a person who he loves.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:13 PM
21

Men can't be victims.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 02:11 PM
34

Yes. So much this. When I was 15 I dated a 20 year old for a short time because I was “so mature” for my age, and I was very frequently hit on or asked on dates by men who were in their mid-late 20s through my highschool years. But I just looked old for my age right? I was just mature right? But now I am 30 and all teenagers look like complete children, exactly as I had. And it has really sunken in how predatory and gross all of those men really were. A girl who dated a guy 5 years older than he…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:44 PM
17

So I just rebrowsed the top posts, and...how to put this politely...you seem to be mistaken on women being attacked or you think exposing double standards or calling to attention body shaming against men is somehow attacking men. Some of those posts are literally showing men being attacked or body shamed and didn't have anything to do with women. So did you scroll until you found a post attacking women and assumed all of them were attacking women?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:27 PM
27

We cant have equality as long as one group actively works against one gender. Feminism is seen as the defacto equality movement, yet, DV and family laws are heavily skewed against men, which is the direct result of feminist involvement. That's why MRAs are harsh toward feminism. I see attacks towards specific women and the notion that women are the "better" sex, but not against just women.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:22 PM
25

What do you mean by "attack women"?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:06 PM
6

No false claim here.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 08:19 PM
5

Family courts being heavily skewed toward women. Sentencing disparity heavily favoring women. School systems k-12 and higher education all favor women. Affirmative action favors women. No selective service for women. Women win political seats at the rate they run. Women who are aged 22-30 out earn their male counterparts. Women who never leave the workforce, ask for raises and promotions like men, earn as much or more than men. Women, despite abusing men at the same rate or higher than men abuse…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:03 PM
3

No, family courts give women children because of the Tender Years Doctrine that spawned from early feminists. The patriarchy doesn't exist, because no patriarchy would strip men of their children by default during custody issues. The patriarchy doesn't exist except in minds of dogmatic feminists.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:49 PM
4

men are more likely to commit suicide because they bottle up their emotions. This seems like a claim from a person who has no idea what it's like to be a man and who never even bothered to ask men. Men are more likely to committ suicide because suicide is an act of last resort. That means the men committing suicide feel like there are no other options, then can't do anything else. Now, where would a man feel this way? Typically in an imbalance of power, for example, if he's going up against the …
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:47 PM
5

They complain about gendered insults, but then create gendered terms to describe bad things in society, IE, mansplaining, manspreading, fragile masculinity, toxic masculinity, patriarchy, etc.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:30 PM
1

That was a definition from Google. How are you a feminist when feminists deny you exist, and lobby to deny you support? Seems like a bunch of edge lord incels honestly that hate women There's the feminist shaming language. If we don't fall on our knees and accept feminists' blatant misandry as "equality", then we are incels that hate women?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:52 AM
2

It's in the definition. A movement for equality based on women's rights. Not men's. Women's. It's in the history of feminists who pushed for policies that specifically were for women, and for historically feminists ignoring or being outright hostile to men. It's in their policies, such as the Duluth model classifying DV as something men do to women. I'm sorry, but what you are doing is ignoring the history of feminism and attempting to paint feminism as this benevolent movement that is only ever…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 05:38 AM
1

They are. To be a feminist means only concerning yourself with women's rights and accepting patriarchy theory. If you don't accept patriarchy theory and you are for equal rights for men and women, you aren't a feminist.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 05:00 AM
3

Feminists support exclusively women's rights based on a theory of oppressors, ie, the patriarchy, and based on what they view equality should look like. If feminists were foe actual equality, they would have stopped a long time ago when they realized DV was pretty much equal between the genders, rape did actually occur to men by women and men were the ones at the bottom of society and not women. As it stands, every year, feminists invent new ways they are oppressed and spend their days trying to…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 03:03 AM
5

This is how feminists collect data. Redefine words to exclude men or male victims, run studies with updated definitions, find out only women are affected negatively, produce papers showing how terrible this is, get funding to fix this problem. Feminists who do this either do not care if men are affected negatively or hope men are affected negatively.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 09:08 PM
5

How much control? Minor stumble, but still good at making decisions? She decides to get tipsy before hooking up...is that on me? Like..this seems to be infantilizing women. Yes, I get falling down, slurred speech and vomiting is way too far. At what line, though, between sober and black out drunk is it OK to have sex with a seemingly consenting woman and not ok? And what about me? Like, if I'm drunk, why is it 100% on me to determine her drunk level? People who say it's easy seem to completely m…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:06 AM
1

Reddit feminists: we totes are for equality. Everything we do is equal. There are no bad faith feminists. This chick exists
/r/MensRights04/07/21 02:26 PM
16

From what I understand, he confessed to doing it in exchange for not bring prosecuted legally. Imo, homeboy is guilty, but if the state made a deal they wouldn't prosecute him, they have to hold up that deal.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:34 PM
3

Ask her if she is interested in an actual conversation or if she just wants you to agree with her. Then ask her to actually listen and not shut down an argument if she doesn't agree. Provide multiple sources to back up claims, so that she can't just say you are making emotional claims. Really, though, open minded feminists are rare. Most are only open to how women are oppressed, and are disinterested in ways men get shafted.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 02:29 PM
5

Sure, but why is is the gap there? I would prefer 100% literacy, but I'm against a government sticking its fat nose into everything to force people to learn to read without regard as to why literacy isn't at 100% We cant look at a gap and just say it's sexism or racism. That doesn't address any of the issues and it assumes there's a problem where there might not be one. The majority of baseball players aren't white in a majority white country. Is this a racism problem? Same with basketball. Are …
/r/MensRights01/07/21 02:38 PM
34

Feminist researcher does biased survey and ends up confirming her bias. She didn't ask women if they would do the same, and she didn't ask men if they were raped or sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 02:26 PM
1

They also get upset at men if they use their opinions to make factual sounding claims about women.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 10:28 AM
2

Yes, when they kill its not premeditated, so they get murder in the second. Or it's an accident, so it's manslaughter or murder 3. When women kill and when they get long sentences, it's because they plan it out. They get the same or probably less of a sentence than men who commit pre medidated murder against their SOs. Yes, women do serve longer sentences if they even get charged and if they even get convicted Women are only charged for the most heinous of killings. They don't even get charged f…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:28 AM
12

It's not what I said, so get your reading comprehension fixed
/r/MensRights30/06/21 11:38 PM
5

The big difference is we aren't ban happy. Sure, I'm going to get people to agree here, but unless I skirt rules and make another account, I'm going to get banned over there for challenging nearly any opinion.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 10:21 PM
3

It's a race to the bottom. Only the most oppressed get their voices uplifted. You have to outvictim the mod to gain their power.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:42 PM
11

I also find it interesting the feminists ask other feminists their opinions on men, instead of asking, you know, men. She wasn't interested in the actual answer, she wanted to run to her echo chamber to have other feminists pet her ego.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:30 PM
18

"Women receive longer sentences for killing their intimate partners than men do. Just saying. Men have less consequences for many actions, such as becoming a parent, and almost no consequences for actions such as rape, which is rarely successfully prosecuted. If someone hits you, you defend yourself with whatever force is *necessary*. If you are not in danger of actual physical harm, if someone just slapped your face or if someone half your size with no training has pushed you, then you don't ne…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:01 PM
3

She asked a few people who said it seemed like they were treated better. We don't know why, but I can guess that a person with more self confidence is treated better. People who seem happier, are treated better than people who seem sad. People with better self esteem articulate their thoughts clearer and with more confidence, and people who do that are respected more. I bet they weren't treated better because they were suddenly men, I bet they were treated better because they acted better. I als…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:53 PM
2

It is a shame that such a thesis sits almost unknown, a few comments deep on a reddit post from a feminist who kinda acknowledged issues men face. This should be read outloud in front of a congressional panel that is taking a case on gender bias in support services and police departments not largely ignored here.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:46 PM
3

The patriarchy isn't real. You are explaining gender expectations.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 12:42 AM
6

If the patriarchy was real, there would be no men at the bottom of society. There would only be 2 domestic violence shelters for women ans thousands for men. Men would get custody of their children nearly 100% of the time, and homelessness would only be a problem if 25% were men. Suicide would need to be addressed if 25% of suicides were men, and testicular cancer funding would be in the hundreds of millions. We would wax on and on about underrepresented male students in colleges even though the…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:54 PM
1

But right now abortion is being taken away as a right in a lot of states by lawmakers and I seriously doubt that the feminists have much power when it comes to law making. So because one issue isn't going your way, you think feminists have no power? I don't care how a random group defines it. I'm a feminist and to me its rape. It doesn't matter, your opinion doesn't matter. The actual feminists that have power don't care what you think. They think you are wrong. They think men can only be raped …
/r/MensRights29/06/21 07:44 PM
1

Are these LEGAL definitions? Because in most states and federal governmental bodies, MEN are the majority of the law makers. Feminists accept that rape against men is real Uh, yes. VAWA defines rape as forced penetration no matter how slight of mouth, vagina or anus. This excludes forced envelopment, which is the primary means of female rapists. So what if majority lawmakers are men? Lol, if they were female lawmakers, would it be better? Or worse? You don't have to be a woman to be feminist and…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 04:09 PM
1

The violence against women act redefined rape to only include forced penetration. There is nothing about forced envelopment, so instances where women have sex with men who can't consent or force men to have sex with them through coercion or threat of violence, are not considered rape. This means that anyone who does a study on rape finds men are rarely "raped", which means that when support services are created, they are tailored for women, and not men. The Duluth model has been used by police f…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 03:47 PM
1

The current definition of rape excludes men as victims when it comes to forced envelopment, domestic violence has been pushed as something only men do by feminists, college enrollment heavily favors women at the detriment of men, etc just to name a few. Yes, I know feminists want men to do more at home, but until women start doing more at work, there isn't enough time in the day to work enough hours to support a family and then come home to do half the housework. Men work the majority of the ove…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 03:03 PM
2

Traditional feminists called for custody to be granted solely to women. They called for "votes for women, chastity for men". After suffrage, they passed out white feathers to any male remotely of fighting age to shame them into going to world War 1. Then they mused over abortion as a way to curb the undesirable races. They they talked about killing 90% of males. Then they figured that a woman forcing a man to penetrate her isn't really rape, so the laws must be changed. Then they said that dv is…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:46 AM
1

And keep women as the defacto custody holder in family courts. And push gender inequality in colleges as long as it benefits young women.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:39 AM
2

That is so vague that it's meaningless tho. Your greatest savior is also people.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 10:32 AM
9

Kill all generalizations
/r/MensRights29/06/21 12:30 AM
2

Come on. 1 in 10? Get real. So you dismiss false allegations that can't be proven to be false, but accept every single claim as 100% true, even if it can't be proven true? No way 10% of all women are getting raped. We know that of all the rape claims that are reported, around 6% end up with convictions and jail time. So if you want to play the bullshit data massaging statistics that feminists love to play, then we can say that only 6% of rape claims are true and the rest are false, yes? If you t…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 10:33 AM
3

When did I say that? Please pull the quote.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:59 AM
1

Period shaming? Noice.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:55 AM
1

What does this have to do with a man getting arrested for staring?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:51 AM
2

Most MRAs do care about women's rights. The problems we have with feminism is that feminists have gendered problems that affect both genders, ignored problems end up actually being gendered (as long as those problems affect men), and use increasingly broad definitions to redefine abuse to cover more and more women.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:49 AM
18

And now we casually wait for feminists to use a study by one lady who has a stake in the game to tell us all that all those other studies showing gender bias towards women in family court doesn't exist and that men are totes treated fairly and equally. All men have to do is trash their 401k and say goodbye to retirement to get the same thing women get for free.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:37 AM
7

Just 1 person? Are you serious? I'm not extrapolating to every feminist, I'm saying she drives policy based on her version of feminism. Her feminism is the feminism in power, that effects lives. You here on reddit have no power, and while I am sure we can have great discussions on equality, you represent nothing of what the overall movement of feminism is. That's the problem. Your ship is captained by misandrists. It's great that you, a person who only has enough power to scrub the deck, may dis…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 12:29 PM
15

That would be Mary Koss and she's been driving her definition of rape for over 30 years now. She's talked about dismissing male victims of rape and she pushed the 1in4 women being raped on college campus myth.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 11:21 AM
16

Gendercritical outright advocated for intentional abortion of males only, and they had lots of posts of women complaining about how awful it was that they had sons or that they were going to have a son.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:58 AM
25

It was feminists that changed rape laws to exclude men, and based on those laws, men get near zero government help and are disbelieved by society. It was feminists that came up with the Duluth model that changed police response to DV across the country, making it to where men get zero support and are arrested even when they are being abused. I'm sure local group with zero power and zero influence on how feminism is viewed and what policies are pushed might be very nice. Most individual feminists…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:47 AM
16

Well, this is what happens when you preach about the "patriarchy" and how all men are complicit in rape culture, and killallmen is just a joke and killing your children is a necessary human right (abortion)..... Trump is responsible for that dude dying to fishtank cleaner for pushing hydroxychloroquine....why aren't feminists responsible for this? You can't tell people they are oppressed and it's all men's fault and not expect this to happen.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:38 AM
6

on this sub? How about on twox or rant or offmychest
/r/MensRights20/06/21 10:27 PM
25

Then stop generalizing men.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:42 PM
9

You also rant about how you are terrified of nearly every man. The point isn't that he's off the list. It's good news he's off the list. The point is that he was on the list in the first place. People who are on the list tend to have to wear a scarlet letter for a long time, even if they are removed from it.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:41 PM
15

Yet, you are here, starting genderwars, then you go to twox to rave about men. Not only did you enlist, you happily go to the front lines, then you slink off like a coward when called out. You hit first, then say you don't want a fight.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:38 PM
32

Oh, that makes it 100% ok. Go back to twox to push misandry.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:36 PM
4

She's trolling in Mensrights because she had abusive parents and she was sexually assaulted. She blames men for all or most of her problems and has a deeply rooted fear of men because of her past. I hope she is going to therapy, because lashing out at men will only make men lash back at her, which will reinforce her fear and anger of men. I'm basing my opinion on her post history. I hold no ill will toward her, btw.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:53 AM
1

Having a home, car and spending money provided to you in exchange for taking care of a family is compensation. And it's tax free.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:32 AM
1

I appreciate it, but I think that other person was asking for the evidence.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:24 AM
8

Feminists don't have to hate men to implement policies that are anti men. Denying men support doesn't require hatred.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:20 AM
4

Probably about the dv, rape stats
/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:17 AM
14

So I feel that you might be a rapist. It would be good for you to go to jail to protect millions of innocents, right? Jailing innocent people just in case is freakin tyranny. You are advocating for tyranny right now.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 01:11 AM
5

That's easy to say you are for equality in a survey. I look at feminism based on actions of fwminist organizations that push insane patriarchy theories, toxic masculinity, push narratives that DV is gendered, push narratives that rape is heavily gendered and forced to penetrate doesn't count as rape, that CEOs should be 50% women but not those icky jobs like trash collection or plumbing, that women still need to he hand held through college even though they make up the majority of students and g…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:33 PM
2

Most responders to fires are firemen, so why not keep that? Most police officers are men, so why not keep policemen?
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:12 PM
1

Feminism has a very powerful political and educational influence that pushes policies based on gender and not on competence, which is sorely needed to combat a burning planet. While feminists try to push women who don't want to be in STEM into STEM and demanding quotas, they are limiting to pool of competent people out there who can develop solutions to the problem. I don't care what gender develops solutions, but feminists do.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:04 PM
11

And he didn't refute nor condemn the belief.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:32 PM
9

Should we putting more pictures of happy male students in our brochures and internet promotions? Grammar aside, maybe stop shitting on men would go further. Promise an environment that strongly protects the rights of accused. Promise curriculums that don't place responsibility for historical grievances on all men. I bet that would be more effective that smiling pictures.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:44 PM
2

Feminists don't think women have agency. It's ironic, really.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:13 PM
2

Basically, she's upset he doesn't read her mind. My mom was this way. "I shouldn't have to ask" Yes, you can be an adult, Rebekah and you can use your words. I bet you don't ask him to mow the lawn or take care of the vehicles or pay the bills, etc. What she wants doesn't exist. Instead of divvying up housework in a way thry both think is fair, she does everything and gets upset because she does everything. Avoid toxic women like this. They hold you to a ridiculous standard they will never tell …
/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:09 PM
1

You want a cookie? Being in the marine corps, most of the stupid crap that service members did was done after midnight. Most of the time I see stupid things happen, has been after midnight. How does my own personal experience make me insane?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:40 PM
6

Morons who pose for photo ops for sweet internet likes.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:33 PM
0

Hey man, sometimes you gotta be out and sometimes it's late. Only place I have been where I have felt safe being out late at night is Okinawa. I wouldn't be out past midnight nearly anywhere else, including the European gunless "utopia".
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:32 PM
1

We disagree then.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 07:00 PM
2

Who said it was 17th century Salem? Taking advantage of your station and using it to sleep with underage non consenting students seems to be pretty bad to me. And the punishment should be much more than an apparent stern talking to.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:47 PM
1

True, but irrelevant factors. Like noted below, rape is more about power than sexual gratification. Just because she was unattractive and he was attractive doesn't mean anything in this situation. Your post didn't list any evidence he actually raped, nor did your post list any evidence she is lying about her claim. Until we have factual evidence either way, I'm not going to call this either way. Yes, the dude deserves presumption of innocence, and yes, her claims should be investigated as if the…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:36 PM
2

By any actual, honest definition of rape, having sex with someone when they cannot consent is rape. As long as we downplay this behavior and treat female perpetrators with kid gloves, the behavior will continue.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:32 PM
6

I call a teacher having unconsensual sex with people who can't consent "rape".
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:07 PM
6

Generally speaking, sure. Specific cases, though, these details aren't pertinent. OPs friend of friend could absolutely still rape a girl, even if she's fat and ugly, even if he's attractive. There are pictures of teachers raping kids, and many of those teachers are attractive.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:27 PM
14

What does how he looks and how she looks matter?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:37 PM
7

Doctors ask husbands about sterilizing their wives Yeah, and Doctors ask wives about sterilizing their husbands. I was asked no less than 10 times that my wife knew, but was not coercing me to get a vasectomy. It's a question about liability, not keeping the wOmEn dOwN! they don't think women's rights are human rights Questioning whether or not women are actually missing rights isn't denying rights. Pointing out no one had rights isn't saying it was acceptable that women didn't have rights. clai…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:07 PM
10

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:15 PM
8

In addition, character assassination.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:03 PM
11

Also statistics show women are every bit willing to use violence against their partners, if not more, than men. So statistics back up what the cop is saying.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 09:48 PM
-1

Everybody exists with criticism and bigotry. Seriously though, how gross do you have to be as a person to genuinely defend transphobia / homophobia? Shaming language. Defending freedom of speech =/= condoning of offensive speech. Only small minded idiots think that defending free speech means you endorse all of it. Despite the direct harm it causes these groups in society (e.g lack of acceptance x the direct correlation with the disproportionate suicide rates among trans teens) I'm sure you will…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 06:20 PM
0

Everybody exists with criticism and bigotry. Seriously though, how gross do you have to be as a person to genuinely defend transphobia / homophobia? Shaming language. Defending freedom of speech =/= condoning of offensive speech. Only small minded idiots think that defending free speech means you endorse all of it. Despite the direct harm it causes these groups in society (e.g lack of acceptance x the direct correlation with the disproportionate suicide rates among trans teens) I'm sure you will…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 06:20 PM
4

Everybody exists with criticism and bigotry. Seriously though, how gross do you have to be as a person to genuinely defend transphobia / homophobia? Shaming language. Defending freedom of speech =/= condoning of offensive speech. Only small minded idiots think that defending free speech means you endorse all of it. Despite the direct harm it causes these groups in society (e.g lack of acceptance x the direct correlation with the disproportionate suicide rates among trans teens) I'm sure you will…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 06:20 PM
3

Women who die in fully equipped hospitals tend to have other issues that male that death occur. Healthy adult women getting pregnant and going to a hospital have a very low chance of complications much less death. I'm not trying to downplay this. Pregnancy puts all the burden of the carrying the child on the woman, which is why women have so many options to avoid pregnancy. The argument from pro choice ignores that vast amount of choice women already have, ironically mirroring feminists that ign…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 03:56 PM
1

So I would like to point out that yesterday I looked up Men's Rights and Feminism subs and it looks like mensrights has more people in its community by a significant margin. Only like 30% of people consider themselves feminists in the real world. Exposing the lies of feminism from the start will either force feminism to fade into obscurity or force them to actually address the outright misandry they have going on and start having adult conversations.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 03:18 PM
8

There's adoption and it's legal to bring the child to a local fire station and drop it off no questions asked. It's why I don't like the pro-choice movement. Women have choices. In fact, pretty much all of them. People are hesitant on killing unborn children and they act like all of their rights are being stripped away. "I want access to abortion!" "You know you can give the child up for adoption and you have loads of birth control options and you can insist on a condom, right?" "No! I don't gav…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 03:03 PM
10

The feminists that support men's mental health support it by pushing toxic masculinity theory. Only indoctrinated feminists think toxic masculinity is a valid idea, but to everyone else, it sounds like it blames masculinity and by extension, men for there own problems. To a man with mental health problems, telling him really its his fault doesn't help and makes the problem worse. Even worse is when feminists explain the actual definition by saying it's societal's expectations of masculinity that…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 02:01 PM
8

Good article going over the "rare false accusation" myth. I have said this before, you can't say every single claim of rape, or even every single claim but not reported claim, is 100% true and that women would never lie about this. We have actual evidence of women lying about rape. RAINN abuses the "women never lie" myth to publicize how rare it is and they ignore male victims of rape by women, by ignoring made to penetrate. Basically, we have a government funded website pushing lies and misconc…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 11:19 PM
46

They have selfish intentions at best. At best, they completely don't even think men or boys not accompanied by a woman exist as something that needs to be saved. There are no 'good intentions' with these feminist organizations. They are first to step up to demand preferential treatment, then the first to cry sexism if they don't get it.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:56 PM
14

A happy story. Very nice, sir.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 04:21 AM
2

I think it's a mix of anonymity and low character count limit encouraging short zingers than any sort of debate. Debunking a lie takes more time and more words than the actual lie, so lies trend and tend to stand unchallenged. Feminists are masters at spreading lies and masters at using shaming language to shut down criticism, both of which take only a few characters.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:04 PM
12

Women survive their attempts to attempt suicide more times. They either survive their attempts because their attempts weren't serious or they received help/intervention.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:49 PM
12

Also, women are only compared to the top <10% of men, with those <10% of men representing all men. So men are simultaneously too stupid to function and the all encompassing oppressor that rules society with an iron fist. Which is it? How are women being oppressed by complete morons?
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:19 AM
21

Men are afraid women will commit character assassination, they aren't afraid of being laughed at. They use the least impactful bad thing that happens to men compared to one of the most impactful things that happen to women. In reality, both the man and the woman are afraid of being rejected. If a woman is terrified of random men raping her, she's not going out on random dates with random men.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:51 PM
7

Exactly. This logic process is how normal people end up justifying abhorrent acts against other people. I mean, didn't Hitler do something similar to Jews? Blames societal problems on them, convinced people it was ok to "punch up", thus getting lots of people on board with the holocaust?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 12:32 PM
9

They are also saying the men are strong enough to handle this kind of crap, but women are way too fragile by default to handle any sort of adversity.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 12:26 PM
3

So she tried to spend some time helping men, said fuck that, then spent the rest of her time gendering the shit out of domestic violence and ignoring male victims completely. TLDR Misandrist spends her life ignoring male victims of DV and pushing the narrative only women are victims.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 07:18 PM
13

If they are more powerful, then how are men oppressing them? Does this woman think?
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:28 PM
8

That would be easy to dismiss...this is much worse. She went through an acredited education system and put her batshit crazy ideas up for review, and a bunch of other "Dr.'s" said, 'Soooouuunnndds good to me!'
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:08 PM
37

And she's a Dr......
/r/MensRights05/06/21 04:00 AM
3

Getting banned from feminism usually gets you a ban from there, too. Askfeminists is every bit as garbage as feminism or twoX. They do not handle anyone challenging their logic or stances, at all. I earned my ban for questioning the statement that all women were always oppressed. Apparently, women are permanently oppressed for all time, which questions why there's even a movement if no amount of improvement means anything.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:51 AM
9

Don't base your faith in humanity on that sub...there is no humanity there.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 12:41 PM
7

It's good they recognize this is wrong, though and it's good they are using the appropriate word. Mary Koss has gone through a lot of effort to exclude male victims, and until her claws are removed from having influence in making policy regarding sexual assault, these men will not be counted as rape victims.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 12:14 AM
6

Where are these people? Because here in this sub, they get downvoted and called out.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 08:17 PM
6

I bet she was overjoyed when Trump appointed a gay dude to his administration. Right? .....right?
/r/MensRights02/06/21 08:05 PM
53

Imagine that, a group claiming that the world marginalizes and infantalizes women does exactly that.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 08:04 PM
13

It's shaming language to get you to not identify as an MRA or support men's rights. They do the same thing with right wing politics by claim you are either fascist or support fascism. It's what intellectually lazy people do to stop people from critiquing them and to shut down debate.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:15 PM
4

I disagree. You get far more support by exposing the logical shortcomings than just slinging insults.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 01:54 PM
11

Those are all valid concerns when making these claims, but as long as they are anonymous, they must be dismissed, as these claims can't be proven. There should be a way to file an allegation without getting shit on, but anonymous allegations isn't the way. This is college, and feminists are more than happy to have students go on Wikipedia editing marathons, pay women for surveys they can then claim those women were all or mostly raped, etc. Getting them to make anonymous rape allegations against…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:21 AM
12

And they are much less likely to even be sentenced. The only case women have longer sentences is when they murder their spouse, and that is because they rarely get charged for murdering their spouses. When they do get charged, it's because it's premeditated out the ass. Yes, the guy that beats you is a piece of shit, but you can't have a 12 step detailed plan on killing him and removing the body. I saw this on aakfeminists and they said this was patriarchy in action, and they mourned how women's…
/r/MensRights31/05/21 02:58 PM
4

No..its rape because she penetrated the student. They won't call it rape if she had forced him to penetrate her.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 12:21 AM
6

Isn't that just condescension, though? Why gender this term? Women do this exact same behavior, but we don't have a term for that. Why do feminists like create new terms just to shame men?
/r/MensRights30/05/21 11:38 PM
2

Oh yeah, I'm having a swell time
/r/MensRights27/05/21 06:39 PM
19

They would label you as alt right adjacent and be content with hating you anyway. The labels are designed to shut down debate.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 12:06 PM
41

I find it sad that these days, there are plenty of people out there who are 100% on board with mass censorship and some that even outright argue in favor of mass incarceration or mass murder as long as it's against people they disagree with. Obviously nazis are bad, but they still have freedom of speech. That sentence right there has been used to label me a nazi sympathizer, and thus pretty much a nazi. Which means I apparently don't deserve freedom of speech, and it means I should be in jail or…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 11:26 AM
2

I would be surprised if men were even asked.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 10:22 PM
24

And because she made claims he was abusive, which seems to be the MO of women who divorce their husband and desire to strip him of all parental rights.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 08:54 PM
1

I really need to find the study about this, but iirc, the studies basically found that "alpha" or more masculine guys push boundaries of soft "no's" more than less masculine men, BUT were more likely by far to accept a hard no than a less masculine man. Basically, these women who refuse to date non feminist men, are actually increasing the likelihood of them experiencing sexual assault. If they wanted to actually avoid rape, they would refuse to date feminist men, avoid male feminist friends or …
/r/MensRights25/05/21 12:56 PM
14

It is correct, though. From the beginning, feminism has been specifically a women's rights movement. Throughout its entire history, it has never advocated for men's rights or for men when men fall behind or when men have issues. The custody problems men deal with now originated from the Tender Years, the start of feminism, that shifted custody from men to only women. Feminism has fought default shared custody for decades. Domestic violence is not gendered, but in the 70s, feminists in Duluth cha…
/r/MensRights22/05/21 04:38 PM
1

You talked about not bringing a culture war here, then brag about winning some culture war? What are you on about?
/r/MensRights22/05/21 12:17 AM
2

culture war bs right wing Pick one The fact is that there hasn't been any protests or movements based on white victims of police brutality.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 07:34 PM
7

I said BLM called ALM detractors. I didn't bring up black people, you did. I said this dude won't have marches for him because he's white, and I'm right. We can agree to disagree. I bet we can also agree that police brutality is a problem we have to address. Edit: Don't downvote this guy. This was a conversation worth having even if we disagree.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:53 PM
5

Yes it has. The push back against all lives matter was to make it a black only problem and then to frame all lives matter as detractors. BLM has done exactly what feminism has done, take an issue affecting nearly everyone and frame it as a black problem or a woman problem.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:16 PM
16

BLM is about whatever any BLM activist wants it to be about at any time. My point about BLM is that it seems to make the claim that police brutality is specifically something done to black people, and it's not. I'm not mad that BLM wants to showcase police brutality against black people, and I'm not mad that they march for black people, so I don't know why you think I'm mad at all. Also, this isn't about "other issues". This is all in the scope of police brutality. We have a police problem in th…
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:06 PM
7

They also lamented the fact that with so many women's shelters, women who are abused can go to those shelters instead of killing men, therefore, men benefit from women's shelters, therefore it's a bad that men benefit from women's shelters. The mental gymnastics of a feminist to paint women's shelters as bad because a few men aren't murdered.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:53 PM
19

There hasn't been any movement recognizing white men getting brutalized by cops is my point. I'm not saying there should be, either. The framing of police brutality is typically about the police killing black people. When BLM marches, it's about black victims. When people push back and say that the police are brutalizing all races and not just black people, that criticism gets dismissed as detractors and/or racist privilege or whatever. There weren't marches for this guy getting killed by those …
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:38 PM
38

Check his skin tone, there won't be any movement for him. If there was going to be a movement, it would have happened in 2019, when he died.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 12:51 PM
7

Genders aren't mentioned perse; the definition is about forceful penetration, and to be a rape victim, you must be penetrated. Surveys on sex without consent show women perpetrate non consexual sex a lot more frequently than first thought, and when they do, it's by forcing their victim to penetrate them. This means there are thousands, if not millions of male victims of rape out there that are ignored because what happened to them isn't "rape". This means studies about rape do not include these …
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:21 PM
7

Those laws have to be well over a hundred years ago. The only ones I can see as "against women" are abortion laws, but that is less specifically against women and more about the child. If it were men giving birth, the issue would still be very controversial, as where do rights of individuals start? Whose rights trump whose?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 04:14 PM
9

Changing rape definitions to exclude female on male rape via forced to penetrate. Lobbied against default shared custody. Duluth model which most police forces use for responses to DV situations. To name a few.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:20 PM
7

Yes. Anytime I go there, which is rare now, it is a cesspool of garbage. Avoid Twitter as much as possible.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:12 PM
20

2-10% are verifiably false Around 6% are verifiably true That leaves a while middle grey area that's either true or false with not enough evidence to say either way. We cant handwave away false claims "because they are rare" without also hndwaving away true claims. If 6% is enough for feminists to be concerned about, then logically speaking, so is 2-10%.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:11 PM
31

Most people understood what you were saying.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 03:37 PM
1

What is your question?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:46 AM
4

New issues are brought up or different research into old issues are brought up daily...so what do you mean? Do you always have an open mind on every conversation no matter what? Lol Why wouldn't I? This isn't about me, this is about you prejudice this sub for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:22 PM
6

If you refuse to have an open mind, that is 100% on you.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:11 PM
4

Literally irrelevant there couldn’t vote because they were poor not because they were men. Iterally relevant because women who were land owners could vote. Most real feminists acknowledge this, patriarchy fucks over men in a lot of ways. Then it isn't a patriarchy by feminist definition. That one stat doesn’t prove much, why women perform better is more relevant and if women have more employment opportunities how come women consistently make less? Maybe there is more going on. Women 22-30 make m…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:09 PM
7

Then you haven't actually read what's here with an open mind.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:50 PM
7

"You realize that women couldn’t vote till the 20’s right" And most men couldn't vote until a few years before that, and men only received the right to vote in exchange for the draft, something feminists avoided. Both men AND women have been legally oppressed for centuries. "Secondly just because no law says women have less rights doesn’t mean in practice men and women are equal." You are right, there are areas where women have a lot more rights and areas where men do. Feminism loves to claim th…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:32 PM
13

I mean, pot kettle
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:07 PM
9

Then you haven't exactly taken a look at the history of feminism.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:54 PM
8

Feminism, while being modeled after civil rights, isn't civil rights. Objectively, there were rights that black people didn't have or laws that were harmful to black people. None of this applies to women, as women hold all the rights men hold, and there are no laws that are harmful toward women. Women outperform men at school, university and work. Studies after studies going back for 20 years have shown women gaining ground and surpassing men. Instead of acknowledging these advances and then wor…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:43 PM
13

And history.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:29 PM
6

Your viewpoints aren't "opposing". They are bad faith arguments not based on reality. There are plenty of disagreements between users here in this sub, so your feaux concern over the creation of an echo chamber isn't warranted.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:26 PM
8

Chris Brown came out an apologized. Him and Rihanna are friends to this day. We won't talk about how Rihanna started hitting and slapping Chris, or how she reached over and grabbed his nuts or started kicking him. I'm not excusing him beating Rihanna, at all, but if anything, Chris seemed to have owned up to what he did. Cardi B wears what she did as a flag of pride.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:25 AM
3

It doesn't look good, that's true. Perhaps that's their goal. To pose bad faith arguments, and to make MRAs look bad when they call him out. From what I can tell, not once is their concern actual men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 06:59 PM
5

This user is constantly commenting in bad faith from the feminist POV here. Any other feminist that comes here to have a conversation, as long as they keep it respectful, tends to get respectful answers in return. This user is getting treated poorly because of his poor treatment towards this sub.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:17 PM
21

Objectively, there is a gap between what full time men make and what women make. It's not a problem, because nearly all of that gap is explained by differences in how men and women approach work, starting salary negotiation, etc. Basically, feminists claim these explanations aren't enough so sexism must be at play, but then dismiss gaps unfavorable to men.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:49 AM
17

"Why would a self titled equality movement be vocal about something unrelated to women's rights?"
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:19 AM
60

Does men's rights claim to be the de facto equality movement? No, it doesn't. Does feminism? Yes it does. Your last sentence is acceptable, but feminisms claims it is an equality movement, which it isnt.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:17 AM
29

If feminisms stance is that women are oppressed for the wage gap which is just about 99% down to women's choices, then men are oppressed for this fatality gap. When this gap, or custody gap or sentencing gap or any other gap that is unfavorable to men are brought up, suddenly feminists are loaded down with nuance and acknowledging women's choices. You can't force women to work jobs they don't want to work just to push equality, exactly, which is why the wage gap is bullshit. You can't force wome…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:15 AM
17

Both men and women created society. As for why this gets brought up, it's because feminists point to the wage gap as reasons they are oppressed. If they do this, you point to fatality gap or sentencing gap or child custody gap or the college graduation gap. If they wave it off, you know they aren't interested in actual oppression, they are interested in keeping feminism relevant. We know why the wage gap exists and what effects that gap. We know this because it's studied thoroughly from all angl…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:59 AM
14

Boys will be boys is how boys learn to handle conflict, and how they learn how not to handle conflict. It is much better for boys to learn that punching another boy in the face isn't a 1st option, and it's better for them to learn this lesson before they can break faces and hands. Of course you don't want kids fighting, but they have to learn what happens if they let a conflict escalates into a fight.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:13 AM
12

He doesn't claim to be.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:54 PM
3

There's a shot that she's wanting another guy to be "dad" and your co worker establishing parental rights might get in the way of that.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:23 AM
5

The top level comment qualification is an excuse, as they will ban you for questioning a top level comment, or questioning concepts inherent to feminism or mentioning that no, not all women are oppressed. Apparently if you think VP Harris isn't oppressed, then you get a ticket to ban city.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 01:27 AM
2

Ditto...crap managers aren't gendered imo. I've had good female and male managers and terrible male and female managers.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 05:18 PM
5

Pretty similar. Feminists thinks MRAs are evil and I'd wager most MRAs think feminists are just wrong. Though, with feminists like Clem Ford, it's not too far fetched to see MRAs thinking some feminists are evil.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 01:45 PM
3

"We specifically only asked women who were victims of assault by men, and we found they all were victims of assault by men! That means all women should be afraid of all men based on our totally legit study we did."
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:11 AM
3

This is going to sound terrible, and it is, but I expect her son to either commit suicide or turn to violence. Childhood abuse leads to both of those, and I can't imagine the abuse Clem heaps on her son.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:55 AM
3

She goes around saying to kill all men and said that she was disappointed Covid didn't kill more men, then whines that people thinks she hates men, then posts his shit, solidifying her as a defacto midandrist.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:52 AM
5

Karen Straughan as well.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 10:03 PM
31

Be prepared to be banned from feminism and twoX subreddits as well. Feminism has done a very thorough job in declaring itself the only equality movement and they maintain their status by shaming anyone who questions feminism. Thank you for stopping by and I hope you learn a lot.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 09:58 PM
11

We call them feminists.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:38 AM
0

No not as motivated, differently motivated for different outcomes. A woman might not be motivated to slave away for 60 hour weeks for a company, but she would be motivated to put in 60 hours for work she feels is fulfilling. Or 35 hours into a company and 25 into her home. Bridging the wage 'gap' is a simple matter of getting women to apply for positions they don't feel qualified in, negotiate for higher starting pay and raises.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:31 PM
22

Critical thinking is heavily discouraged. You are not allowed to question the dogma of feminism, unless your questions are pushing feminism further to the extreme of misandry. Questioning if the patriarchy actually exists or if it's even oppressive? Not allowed. If you do this, you will be labeled a misogynist, rape apologists and banned from any sub having to do with feminism. The echo chamber must be maintained. Questioning if the patriarchy actually means women are being raped more than once …
/r/MensRights25/04/21 10:39 PM
4

Can't have any words that aren't rubber stamped approval from the tyrants mods.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:44 PM
4

"I don't feel comfortable being involved with a woman" What a sexual predator!
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:39 PM
2

Ironically, the sub you got banned for probably qualifies more of a hatesub than this one. If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's straight up misandry. Also ironically, the more they ban people, the more the people they deem as hateful congregate in subs that accept them, making some subs actually hatesubs. Since this sub really doesn't ban anyone, people who post hateful drivel get downvoted pretty hard for the most part.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:06 PM
33

Which means, this is a false accusation that never hits any studies. When feminists do their studies into rape, your accuser's story is listed as a real rape, but since it never got legal, so to speak, the false accusation isn't ever recorded. I wonder if there is a way to get the college to sign a statement saying you are innocent of this claim. This way if someone does accuse you of rape, you can back up your innocence with a document.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:00 PM
1

So you had two positive interactions that means all the other men here who had women assume they were creeps don't exist? Alrighty. I've had positive interactions as well, but I've had negative ones, too.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 12:47 PM
1

They are? If you say so.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 02:25 AM
1

No, of course not, but there are plenty of stories of men getting told off or scorned for saying hi to a kid.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 01:10 AM
2

While it's true that she has been fed propaganda, telling her straight up my make her cling to that propaganda even harder. Asking her questions to get her to question her beliefs, showing her statistics that show that many of her beliefs are based on false info, show her quotes from prominent feminists saying masandrist shit, and show her that if she wants equality, you two are on the the same side will get far better results. She has to come to her own conclusion that feminism isn't exactly fo…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:24 PM
7

Most assuredly. These days, people have gone all in on with us or against lines of thinking. Social media has made it to where people with outlandish ideas can get together and bullshit their way through said ideas without facing anyone that will challenge them. Used to, if you want to share stupid opinions, you had to say it to someone's face, amd they were free to call you an idiot. So these feminists get to say the most vile things ever, and they get upvotes by other horrible people.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:44 PM
38

98% of sexual assaults are committed by men, yet any survey done with gender neutral language shows its not even close to 98% men. While men do seem to make up most of the sexual assault aggressors, women rank highly when being the aggressors against men. It's almost as if surveys that make sexual assault a gendered issue and ask gendered questions, get gendered results. Shocking, I know.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:42 PM
22

Lol, calls you misogynist without proof, gets upset when you call her misandrist.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:38 PM
0

Facts. Those women in that sub get off of saying the most vile things about men, and they echo that hate pretty strongly.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:34 AM
3

That's not a qualifier for people to treat men as crap when it comes to kids. I mean, yes, I'm not a child a predator and I like to think I'm a good person, but that didn't stop a church from insisting only one of their female daycare workers could change my daughter's diaper, or my wife, but not me, because "you know. Having a man back there makes people uncomfortable."
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:32 AM
74

Yeah, don't go there. It's a hive of scum and villainy.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 08:36 PM
2

Yes. Be better than feminism.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:40 AM
6

If there is a decent chance of getting caught and punished, then people will change. Women already complain that guys don't approach them more since the metoo movement came about, this will make it worse.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:36 AM
8

Or will DAs even bring charges against women? Even if charges are brought, will a jury convict? Will she get free legal services when he won't? Even if convicted, will she serve any time? How will the sentencing go, especially if she has a kid?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:54 AM
10

Don't mention you have Arab ancestry, and she uses this law to put you in prison because she thought you were Jewish. Don't mention your dick is average sized, even though you are black, and she puts you in jail for being deceptive. Don't mention any number of things guys don't mention and get slapped with a charge for deceiving your partner. Don't mention your kid you have with another woman? Don't mention your crazy ex? Don't mention you spend time taking care of your grand mother? Don't menti…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:51 AM
15

Dude, it's the point of dealing with a lawyer in the first place. Why is this law even a thing? How much will you charge your client to defend him? You ain't doing it for free. What happens if he can't pay you? He takes a plea deal. He then has his name on the registry for a sex crime. He spends time in jail. His prior life is over. Your client decided to break up with my client 2 weeks after sleeping with her. Clearly, he was only interested in sex, and once he received that, he broke up with h…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:41 AM
22

Makeup is clearly deception. You are hiding flaws, highlighting cheekbones, drawing attention to eyes and away from flaws. Men don't have a problem with it because they like looking at women, but it's still deception. So are pushup bras that make breasts seem more perky, isn't that deception? Heels make the legs look longer and tighten the butt. Is that deception? How did this law get thought of? Only by people who have never dated a woman and think that only men use deception in the dating game…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:25 AM
4

Maybe it's different where I live, but I don't get any stink eye or anything from saying hi to kids or waving at them. Maybe it's gotten better or maybe it's the ring on my finger, I don't know.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:54 AM
7

Will it if rape laws pretty much exclude the most common way women rape men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/21 11:09 AM
13

Most assaults, period, for women happen by people thry already know. Random women aren't getting beat up in the streets at any statistically significant rate.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 04:47 PM
15

"...a man 3x your size and no way to fight back?" Welcome to the second amendment, lady.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 04:36 PM
33

Well, she said he did something bad. An investigation was carried that said he didn't do said bad thing. Now, if this was a case of him pressing charges for stealing his stuff, then it would be innocent until proven guilty. He he claimed she slandered him in a vacuum, it would be innocent until proven guilty. But since we have an investigation proving he didn't do shit, that makes her claim a lie. Ergo, she has been proven guilty.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:52 AM
1

I like it.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 11:00 AM
2

What would that be? Gutter fallacy?
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:52 AM
1

I meant 6% of reported rapes are provably true, ie, result in a guilty verdict and jail time. 2-10% are provably false. It isn't a misconception. I see people claim this to dismiss the point that if 2-10% is dismissable for its rarity, then so is the 6%. We all want to lower rapes, and we want to lower false accusations. Both are very serious and cause disastrous repercussions for victims of both. I am tired of feminists telling us to stop worrying about false accusations due to their rarity, wh…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 01:19 AM
4

Thank you, it's been a bit since I was up to date on her shitfest.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 08:02 PM
7

Cheating on him with a guy she seemed like she was grooming from a young age* The dude was well under age in the pictures she took naked and in his bed. So, you know, statutory rape in addition to the sexual assault when he was of age.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:30 PM
6

And it ignores that rest of the population that didn't have that power, male or female. Apparently, if 1 guy is a king, then all men are kings.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:23 PM
2

He also has to acknowledge past queens that very much did rule.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:22 PM
4

Women win political seats at the rate they run. There is no barrier for women that isn't there for men. There is no evidence women have less social power than men. Do we live in a monarchy now? The 1600s called and want their stupid argument back. The residual effects are fading and nearly gone. We know this because young women today are more educated and out earn men. Again, they gain political seats at the rate they run. Even with men in more political seats, men pass laws that benefit women, …
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:20 PM
2

The 2-10% are probably false claims. If 63% of assault go unreported, then how many women making a threat they would make a false claim go unreported? How many social assassinations have occurred that don't reach the cops? How many just get a guy fired? Or ostracized? It's not though. That 2-10% are actual false claims where the woman admits or is proven to have lied. It doesn't include baseless claims or withdrawn claims. If you want to call the 2-10% probably false claims as too rare to worry …
/r/MensRights08/04/21 04:28 PM
7

Meghan Marckle? The literal princess? Are you high? Brie Larson got on stage and ranted about white men. You don't get to claim being a victim when you throw the first lunch. Ok, compare mgtow to female dating femaledatingstrategy and you'll find mgtow is almost tame. Two chromosomes gets pretty misandrist at the drop of a hat. Female preference is everywhere, bro. Males get targeted for some areas of life, women for others. Don't handwave the sheer amount of push for women in stem, women gettin…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 02:21 PM
9

The pain isn't unimaginable (epidurals are a thing and widely used) and baby boys aren't an enemy. Men don't look down on women, most tend to out them on pedestals. Your struggles and pain, when proved they are real, are treated seriously and men move mountains to keep women from struggles and pain. However, when your struggles and pain aren't real, you are rightly mocked for being a lying sack of shit. When you claim you make less than the men who work with you, we are going to ask you to prove…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 02:08 PM
8

Men get custody if they spend large amounts of money to fight for their children, and if the woman doesn't claim he was violent. As for women more depressed and stressed being married, do you have evidence of this? Women do the lions share of the housework, men do the lions share of repairs, yard work and vehicle maintenance. Men also do the lions share of paid work. And recently, men are doing more housework than in the past. Both parents have to be involved with the children, so cry me a river…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:59 PM
10

It doesn't matter if men were barred from rights based on sex. It's a pretty unintelligent outlook to view denied rights as ok as long as it wasn't due to sexism. Most of human history, men and women struggled together. The only people with power were the ones at the top. Most men and women struggled in the dirt with no rights, trying to put food on the table and keep a hostile environment outside. Devalue women, wtf are you smoking? Women are the most valued between the genders, and were protec…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:25 PM
10

And it looks like they will just call it "vandalism".
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:16 PM
11

They aren't conservatives either. They are moral authoritarians that want the world to conform to their strict worldview. They aren't trying to keep society as it is, and they aren't looking to make a more free and equal world. I don't think they fit either liberal or conservative. I would say progressive, but their ideas don't seem to fit any sort of definition of 'progress'.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:13 PM
1

And I did Google the phrase, I see lots of articles, not by anyone who is for all lives matter, but by people shitting on all lives matter. So people write articles parroting this same idea.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:13 PM
1

I have only ever seen commenters say the exact same thing over and over.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:09 PM
1

I have only ever heard this from people who criticize ALM. I have never ever heard anyone calling for ALM attempt to discriminate or attempt to derail issues with the black community. You are parroting things you heard from people who parrots from someone else. There is no evidence ALM was created to move the spotlight away from BLM. It was created to be inclusive.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:55 PM
2

"She is shattered with what has happened." Not what she did, "what happened". What's with the passive voice? She didn't fall out of the sky and land on two bouncers. Voldemort didn't use imperio on her to force her to assault 2 guards. There was no wizard casting suggestion or loki with the mind stone in a staff. "What has happened" What she did*. Fixed.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 11:54 PM
1

But this doesn't mean that every rape claim that isn't proven to be false or proven to be true is inherently true but baseless. The grey area between proven false and proven true is steeped in both true and false allegations without enough evidence to be proven true or proven false. Feminists have labeled the grey area as 100% true rapes, but "rape culture" keeps society from recognizing them as 100% true. RAINN is insanely guilty of this. Anyone who actually believes that every single rape clai…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 11:46 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:25 PM
3

That's what I mean. Feminists focus on women's rights and declare themselves the sole equality movement with any other movement being invalid. Not all Feminists, of course, just the ones that are in academia, government, large organizations, etc. I wager more normal, day to day Feminists, when pushed, are egalitarian in nature and can be supportive of mens rights. The ones at the helm of feminism? Lol, no. They are outright hostile to any men's rights advocacy.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:14 PM
3

Mary Koss wasn't a feminist? That's news to me.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:53 PM
3

MRAs don't claim to be the sole equality movement, and from what I have seen here, there is more egalitarian ideals than anything from the feminist side. MRAs focus on issues men face, that is true, but we aren't going to advocate for a law that is obviously biased against men, a la Mary Koss and changing the rape definition to pretty much exclude men. Or advocate for default shared custody laws be struck down or canceled a la National Organization of Women. Or advocate for domestic violence bei…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:52 PM
8

Yes, the advocacy of women's rights. Not women's and men's rights. Specifically women's rights. This men's the movement is based 100% are looking at women in ways that society wrongs them. It doesn't look at society as a whole and how it wrongs both men and women, it doesn't look at women and how they may wrong men, it only looks at women. So how can this be an equality movement if is unable to look at society with nuance? How can feminism claim to be an equality movement if feminism is only abo…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:36 PM
2

Look deep into salary data and find that women work fewer hours, take off more time, leave the workforce sooner, don't negotiate salaries as much, don't negotiate raises or bonuses as much, opt for less lucrative and safer jobs, less risky jobs, and on and on. It's not what nature intended, it's what choices women make. The soccer team fiasco is a perfect example. The women declined the same contract that men had in favor of more stable pay, more benefits, etc in lieu of more bonuses based on pe…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:25 PM
1

It's almost like it's a mercurial definition that can change form on a whim of whomever uses the term. It's almost like a broad stroke definition that is used to slander men and steer conversations into ways men are toxic, which seems unhelpful at best and disastrous at worse. I'll take this term seriously when it is defined clearly without ambiguity AND there is a toxic feminity definition with the same standards. As long as toxic masculinity is defined so loosely and is used as more of a diss …
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:12 PM
2

TM means whatever the feminist using it wants it to mean at any given time.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:05 PM
10

Because it isn't sexual harassment? Harassment has to be a continued behavior, not just one comment. Was what he said stupid? Well yeah, but it wasn't sexual harassment. Just like what he said wasn't rape, or robbery, or jaywalking. People aren't defending sexual harassment, they are calling for accuracy. Something that isn't sexual harassment shouldn't be labeled as such, just because you want to shill for a woman making false claims.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:57 PM
8

Wtf are you talking about rape culture. Even her claim has nothing to do with rape. He apologized, which isn't something a rapist would do. There is no rape culture argument here. A shitty pickup line isn't even close to rape.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:51 PM
2

Or insist on bigoted definitions. No man is a rape victim if the definition excludes them, no matter how much research or surveys are done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 02:55 AM
14

I honestly think they do believe it, and they use this believe to assign intent to everything you say. Most of the time when I get into a debate with someone who uses these ist words, no middle ground can be reached. It doesn't matter how polite I am, or any concessions made, or any time I have pointed out areas where we agree, they assign evil intent to my side, and keep using the slurs. So it's partially its an attempt to shut people down, and it's a tactic to keep them from agreeing with anyt…
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:16 PM
6

It directly hurts women going into stem, because in order to be good at something, you have to gave reliable and accurate feedback. If you are given scholarships and preference in school and hiring, once you hit the workforce, you may fail pretty badly, having been robbed of the experience of failure. This happens with minorities getting bonus points on their SAT exams and getting into colleges they aren't matched with. (I must note that plenty of minorities are perfectly capable of succeeding a…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 12:12 AM
1

I am sure this will help with marriage rates, and I am sure no woman would ever take advantage of such broad legislation.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:09 PM
3

What I mean, is that with feminism, radicals have been at the actual helm since its inception. The feminist organizations have been driving sexist policies from the start. If the were advocating for equality and were actually pushing for equality, but we had some allmenaretrash and killallmen hashtags, then yes, it would merely appear that radicals have the helm. Feminism successfully advocated to change rape laws to effectively exclude men. They lobbied for VACA which paints men as the only peo…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:27 PM
2

Add Duluth feminists to the mix that set police police for decades that assumed men are the ones who commit domestic violence against their wives, thus leading to men being arrested more often for calling the cops on their abusive wives than actually getting any help from the cops.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 09:44 PM
7

The radicals have been at the helm of feminism since the beginning.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 09:30 PM
6

Sort by controversial for some real winning comments. '"Not daily, so doesn't count" "Women still have it worse" "None"
/r/MensRights29/03/21 12:08 AM
4

Thats a garbage sub. It bans people for pushing back on any answers given, thus contributing to a vile echo chamber of victim mentality. So, go to askfeminists, and assuming you haven't been banned for merely posting in here, you will be most likely banned shortly after asking thus question.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 03:30 PM
6

No followers, no power. No cushy tenure positions, no profit raking in cash. No courses that are mandatory to teach men about how great women are. If women aren't oppressed, then feminism dies. Feminists are not keen on letting go of that power.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 01:53 AM
1

You say this an easy answer, but this is rehearsed nonsense where feminists view women only through the lense of being victims, and they see women as victims perpetually. Old time language when referring to everyone used the term 'man' or 'mankind' or 'men'. It's done today. You think Neil Armstrong only was referring to men when he said 'One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.'? No doubt women had fewer rights, but both men and women were roughly in the shitty boat until technology …
/r/MensRights22/03/21 10:40 PM
3

If it's just a name, why do you cling to it instead of adopting egalitarianism?
/r/MensRights19/03/21 03:11 AM
3

Peanut butter and jelly Red beans and rice
/r/MensRights27/12/20 09:21 PM
0

Really, do you have any published feminist studies that say this? r/feminism and r/askfeminists both disagree with you. Prominent feminists that push for actual policies disagree with you. Andrea Dworkin, who got the US to change the rape laws disagrees with you. So no, the 'overwhelming' stance of feminism isn't that men can be raped by women, it's that men are the de facto rapists and can only be raped by another man. Some instances feminists admit a woman can rape a man, only if she penetrate…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:50 PM
5

Feminists only believe men can be raped by other men. Feminists absolutely do not believe men can be raped by women, nor do they believe women can be rapists.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 02:08 AM
1

It's not even written in their textbook like that. It's a woman's rights movement based on equality of the sexes. Not in academia nor in the dictionary nor its actions does feminism do anything positive for men.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 04:08 PM
5

I just went to the ladies room. Asked the hostess to make sure it was empty, and went in to change my daughter. Like 3 women came in and gave me props. They don't want changing tables in the men's room, get the hostess to clear out the women's for you.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 11:01 PM
1

Yup, I agree. Women exhibit lots of behaviors that can be considered toxic. It's like most feminists are completely blind to women's faults.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:26 PM
2

When I've pushed on this in the past, I was told that feminine behaviors can't be destructive, therefore, toxic femininity isn't a thing.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:24 PM
1

What if they are going to see this stuff, but there just isn't that many of them. Feminists are a pretty decent minority. Like what? 30% of women identify as feminists? Thats a very small target audience. Male feminists are even fewer. Of everyone that likes to go to the movies and are feminist and have money....that has to be a very small number of people. Even if they all went, it wouldn't be enough to prop up these movies.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:32 AM
2

They had Millia Jovovich in them. Def watchable.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:47 AM
5

The shennanigans around that movie was unreal. It hit when there was virtually no competition. Alita was already out for a few weeks and everything else was some sort of documentary or something. Disney swooped in to keep all the bad reviews off of RT, and like you said, it was painted as a must see before endgame. Lots and lots of manipulation to get those numbers that high. A good movie would have sold itself. Still, it made over a billion so people did go out to see it.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:45 AM
5

People who make that argument of strength always ignore that you don't have to falcon punch her. Punches aren't binary.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:03 AM
52

Arms are used more in defensive uses than offensive uses at about a rate of 10 to 1 at the most conservate for defensive use and liberal for offensive use. The question is, why is your country valuing keeping its populace weak and terrified over allowing it to defend itself?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:34 PM
3

Trust in others is a pretty big thing to lose. Viewing all women as ticking time bombs is another. You could keep all that other stuff still have suffer due to lack of a fulfilling relationship.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 12:44 AM
2

If feminism admitted women were equal to men but merely made different life choices, they would find themselves swiftly out of jobs and out of power. Why would they ruin their own livelihood if they have more money to make and more power to take?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:28 PM
1

So women have the special right to be primary caregivers? You have to admit that women are more likely to be primary caregivers, it's not a privilege afforded to them more often than not it's a burden when it comes to their careers. Weird how you suddenly recognize nuance when it comes to privileges afforded to women, but fail to provide any nuance when it comes to privileges afforded to men. Yes, it is a privilege to be seen as the default caregiver. Do you think men don't want to see their kid…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:03 AM
1

No, YOU don't know what privilege is. You handwave away legit examples of privilege and move the goalposts to make your narrative still acceptable. women are most likely to be primary caregivers therefore juries will sympathise more. Which is a privilege. It keeps women out of prison, and it keeps criminal history off their record. That is a bona fide privilege. How well women do in academia however doesn't effect their career prospects. 'In 2018, women earned 85% of what men earned, according t…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:56 AM
1

Locked zero replies. They do not appreciate any sort of criticism, which is why it's a batshit crazy sub. No one can police stupid ideas, so stupid ideas run unopposed.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:24 PM
2

No such thing as female privilege? How bout serving way less time if you get convicted of...well...anything as a woman vs as a man? Have you seen any videos where 2 actors act like they are fighting, and typically, when the woman is assaulted, she gets loads of people, male and female walking up to help. When the guy is getting assaulted, people ignore him and laugh. If he fights back, people tell him to cut it out. No privilege there to automatically get social help from people, even if you are…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:07 PM
3

But feminism will collapse if women cast off their victim status. People making a living pushing this victimhood on women won't have a job if feminism collapses.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 05:51 PM
4

This is Australia, who's done a full feminist swan dive into a lake of insanity. I don't see her facing much if any punishment.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 05:35 PM
10

They are against any sort of critique against women, at all.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 05:04 PM
3

Name the exact religious purpose behind circumcision, please.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:34 PM
8

I had an argument with a chick on twitter about this. It boiled down to, you can't cut girls because it's aweful. Cutting boys is ok, because she likes how cut dicks look.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:34 PM
1

There's also litigation fear of guys who get snipped, then later want to reverse it and can't, so they sue the doctor that did the snipping.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:32 PM
14

It's about having so much sex she can't walk straight. She's just an idiot cashing in on being shitty to men.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:30 PM
3

Here's an article about it: http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/ https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fviolenceprevention%2Fsexualviolence%2Fdefinitions.html https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:09 PM
14

Probably the idea that she's ok with making it to where women never talk to men again. Which is ironic, because her Side to side song was about banging men all night.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:04 PM
1

Serena is treated well by society, too. Theres a big claim of sexism and double standards, and I'm just not seeing it. I'm seeing a woman throwing a tantrum and getting fined. People are saying men dont get fined like she did, but theres evidence this judge has fined men....more men than he's fined women. If anything, the sexism is in favor of women. Theres this trend that if you call out a woman on her bad behavior, you are sexist. You call out men for bad behavior, and it's an analyst of that …
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:29 PM
3

Let it go? How? I cant hold back anymore. Next you'll ask me not to turn around and slam the door.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:08 PM
3

You agreed with the dude making the jmac claim and I just replied to you. Theres no obsession here....
/r/MensRights12/09/18 08:52 PM
13

I asked you once, and I only just thought about this when I saw the notification. Your definition doesnt apply here. She was wrong. Someone made a claim that JMac was treated well. People disagreed. What's the obsession?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 08:35 PM
18

So bursting the claim McEnroe was treated well is out of proportion?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:56 PM
20

Did he never face any fines? Did he get favorable coverage when he was an ass? Or are you conflating him being liked in Adam Sandler films to being beloved when he was a dick in tennis? Did he cry sexism after being a dick and being fined?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:30 PM
6

Unfortunately, if the laws dont include what she did in the definition of rape, they can't use that word in the article, so as fucked up as it is that they don't mention rape as what she did, it's worse that what she did doesnt even fall in the legal definition of rape. Now, they should say sexually assaulted instead of "had sex with".
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:48 AM
7

Just to be clear, she is asking for him to settle the defamation case. To me, this is her saying, "I don't really have a case, so please give me money and a favorable verdict." This looks to me like David's stance is really strong.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:07 PM
27

Serena is shining the bad light on tennis here. Ok, her coach tried coaching her. The problem is that she fell apart and whined to the line judge and accused him of stealing points. She acted like an entitled princess, and that's 100000% on her. Had she handled that penalty like a professional, maybe she could have battled back and proved to the world that women are capable of handling adversity with dignity and grace. But she didn't. The only reason this is an issue is because she acted like a …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:51 PM
4

Glass cellar jobs don't give feminists any more power, so of course they wouldn't advocate to break through that.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:24 PM
1

I can see the double standards there. I'm just saying this particular post didn't seem to have body shaming, and even didn't seem to have the double standards for hygiene. Lots of women talking about feeling gross after working out and wanting to shower before receiving oral.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:40 PM
8

http://archive.is/RTL2o Edit: And if the cis male penis fails to produce a female orgasm, it’s the woman’s fault — she’s cold. She’s frigid. She’s an ice queen. No, women aren't cold. You are cold. You are cold because you just laid there without even trying to come. You are cold because you just left without caring at all about him. It's so weird for this woman to think it's ok to fuck a rando but not cuddle with him. The rest of this typical feminist word soup is just drivel. Some dudes are cr…
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:13 PM
1

I didn't get any body shaming from this post at all. Seemed like a bit of hygiene issues, and the 12 or so comments I read had nothing to say about him being uncut. Unless there as some comments I didn't see, this isn't body shaming. I'm cut, and I make sure homeboy is clean before the wife goes downtown. Dude in the post just needs to do the same.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:43 PM
1

You are strawmanning argumanetsarguments I'm not even making and I don't know wtf you are talking about. You are in the weeds on a totally different planet. As such, I'm dismissing you and your argument. If you straighten up and attempt a good faith argument, we can continue. Until then, bye.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:55 PM
3

No, that's your dumb logic. Rights are not measured in number of people who have rights but what rights each person have. If 1 million people have only 2 rights each, it does not mean they have more rights than 100 people with 100 rights, each.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:29 PM
5

That's a false equivalency and unborn children dont have more rights than anyone else, in fact much less. So I dont know what you are talking about when you say they have more rights than full grown adults.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:14 PM
3

Removing humanity from something that will, unless something interferes, become a child is an excuse to distance yourself from what is a killing of a child. The stage of that child's life is called a zygote, but it's still a child. I'm not religious, so I reject your claim my stance is due to religious reasons.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:40 PM
7

It being wrong to kill innocent people isnt necessarily religious.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:33 PM
8

Absolutely not. Women having the right to kill their children in their womb does not mean men should have the right to kill children out of it. Arguably, women shouldn't have the right to kill children in their womb, and should only have the right to terminate pregnancies in case of danger to the health of the mother or child or in cases of incest/still born.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:10 PM
2

Sure, but there are finite resources. Ergo, any resources spent must be spent wisely, so we need to decide which things are important enough to use resources and which things are not. This issue? This is more of a "this says mum on it, and there's very few things out there that say dad." than actual discrimination or misandry. If there were a lot more things out there showing dads in a good light, would this cereal box be an issue? I don't want to get bogged down into inaction where resources ar…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:44 PM
1

His "power" was that these women admired him. Ok? Women were attracted to him and he used that attraction to do sexual stuff. How was this bad? He even asked them if he could jerk off, and they said yes. Exactly who was the victim here? Now, you show me the time when a woman said "No" and he jerked off anyway, and I'll grab my pitchfork. If there's evidence he tanked women's careers for saying "No", I'll grab my pitchfork. Until then, it stays put up. He's a funny dude. Weird, definitely, but if…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:41 PM
21

Seems like a weird hill to do battle on. Yes, dads are parents, too, but this is just another stupid sugar bomb. Is it really approved by parents, or is it just something super sweet that kids will eat?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:31 PM
2

Absolutely. I don't think women should be forced to cover them if they don't want to. There are women out there that don't want to wear bras, but they do because they think they'll be shamed if people see their nips. I'm a fan of people only doing things they volunteer to do. If women want to wear bras or tops, then go for it. If they want to forgo that and not wear bras or tops, that should be fine, too. They'll need to accept they'll get more attention that way, but if that's what they want...…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:29 PM
1

Muscles aren't sexual organs and have no function in reproduction. It's ironic you mention body builders, since they wear much different clothes in their daily lives than when they are performing. The tiny thongs they wear in performance would be akin to a woman wearing a bikini. Wearing that tiny thong wouldn't really be that acceptable walking around in public with the definite outline of your junk on display. It would distracting to just about everyone, and women would probably sexualize that…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:22 PM
153

Nothing ever happened! We didn't have sex! He raped me! He....he...he...it's his fault his dick was in me while I was on top! I paid him off so he wouldn't tell people he raped me! Maybe if she vomits more words into the media, some of those words will coalesce into a valid excuse that will absolve her from being one of the worst human beings on the planet.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 01:14 PM
2

Sure, there are multiple zones, but it doesn't change the fact that breasts are one of the more important zones. I don't care if women cover their nipples, as long as they don't care that men look at them.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:57 PM
4

For most women, the nipples are erogenous and light up the same pleasure parts of the brain as her genitals. Secondly, the breasts develop during puberty and signify the reproductivity of a woman, IE, size and symmetry infer reproductive viability. Feet don't develop during puberty, and unless they are on either end of the spectrum, either super amazing or super ugly, are almost completely ignored. I'm not being rude, just making a comparison here.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:13 PM
6

"One-fourth of California's publicly traded companies still do not have a single woman on their board, despite numerous independent studies that show companies with women on their board are more profitable and productive," Correlation is not causation. Jesus, it grinds my gears that people who have the power to impact other people's lives don't have basic understanding of statistics. Any woman who earns he spot on a board of directors should be pissed at this law. It completely undermines the wo…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:05 PM
9

Have any evidence of any of that?
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:56 PM
2

Pay gap = they want the same pay without working the same hours, getting the same credentials, advocating for raises promotions the same, etc. Reproduction rights = they want all the control of children, but when it comes to financial responsibilities, that's for men. Feminist organizations fight against default shared custody and the removal of alimony. They want the ability to opt out of parenthood, but they dont want men to have that same right. You cant tell women not to have sex, but men ar…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:51 PM
7

It's what happens when people let fear run rampant in their lives, and instead of facing their fears, they post in circle jerking echo chambers that reinforce that fear. Instead of telling her how to deal with shoulder rubber, they tell her shes right to be terrified. Now she'll go into work tomorrow, still terrified and without a way to deal with the guy. Instead of providing a solution, they've kept this woman in her fearzone.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:37 PM
2

I was being facetious and didn't meant to come across as insulting.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:34 PM
3

Nope, its pounds per square inch. 10lbs over 1 inch is 10 lbs per square inch. If you double the pounds or half the surface area, you double the psi. If what you say is true, then kitchen knives would be obsolete. You'd just cut things with the side of your finger. 10 lbs / 1 sq inch equals 10 lbs/sq inch 10 lbs / 1/2 sq inch = 10*2 lbs / 1 sq inch = 20 lbs / 1 sq inch or 20psi 10 lbs / 1/1000 sq inch (edge thickness of a sharp knife) = 10,000 psi A 150 grain .38 caliber bullet traveling at 2000…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:11 AM
1

The edge is the power multiplier. A dull knife may not cut unless you really swing it. A sharp knife can cut even if you swing softly. A sharp knife will be even worse if you swing harder or stab deeper. Let's say I put a knife on your arm and push down with 10lbs of force. The knife has a blade 1 inch thick. It will put 10 lbs per square inch on your arm. If I narrow the blade to half an inch and use the same force, its 20lbs per square inch and so on. Knives are dangerous because of the edge. …
/r/MensRights29/08/18 11:30 PM
4

The power of the knife is the edge. A bullet from a handgun is much much duller than a knife, and even if it is powered my an explosion, the pressure per square inch can still be less than a knife. That's why you need self defense rounds that expand to cause addition damage and shock whereas any knife can cause significant damage. Yes, handgun are lethal. No one is arguing against this. The point is that you should be really scared of someone with a knife. They can cause as much, if not more dam…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:45 PM
9

They think if they dismiss you as a person they dont have to defend their arguments.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:21 PM
46

Then they say, "if you care so much about men, do something about it". Then they get ticked off at MRAs for doing something about it..
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:13 PM
5

I didn't necessarily see her roll her eyes, but she was definitely standing there as if she was bored as hell. It's like she was in line at the DMV or something and not at court facing punishment for the things she did.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:07 AM
3

As long as we refer to Jodi Arias stabbing her boyfriend 27 times for rejecting her as toxic feministfemininity, then I guess a dude killing Mollie is toxic masculinity. If that seems absurd....its because it is. People, male or female, need to learn how to deal with rejection. Terrible people do terrible things, and to blame an entire gender on one person's actions without doing the same to other gender for another person's actions is straight up cowardice and hypocrisy. Edit: a word
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:22 PM
2

MRA: Men can be raped, too, and typically our rapists are women. We would like more recognition on this issue. Response: Shut up you piece of shit, if that ever happens, it's so rare it's not even an issue. Money and resources are better spent on the real victims of rape, women. Feminist: Men can be raped, too, and there are a lot of female perpetrators out there. Maybe we should look further into this issue? Response: That's a good point, though it's the patriarchy's fault it happens. Why dont …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:51 PM
2

I didn't know about the backlash on Ronnell. I stand corrected. My point about the age was merely an arbitrary number society thinks is ok for people to start being mature enough for sex. No one wakes up on their 14th or 18th birthday and is bestowed with maturity.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:45 AM
6

What made me able to consent the moment I turned 18? Obviously I know that is the age of consent here - but I’m asking on a moral/mental level. On an individual level? Nothing. Nothing magical happened. On a group level, we as a society determined 18 year olds to be mature enough to make these decisions. There will be cases where there are very mature under 18 year olds getting in relations with over 18 year olds that may result in legal problems. There will be cases where a very immature over 1…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:11 AM
5

Negative on the banning. We arent r/feminism or r/askfeminists. We need the debate here, and if we start banning accounts, this sub will turn into an intellectual cesspool just like those two subs mentioned. Sure, we get brigades sometimes, but it's not often enough to warrant serious action.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:21 PM
6

I'd gladly join a gender neutral equal rights movement, but as it stands, MRAs seem to be more egalitarian than feminists. We dont want affirmative action in favor of men, we want it abolished. We dont want men to get the majority of custody, we want it shared. We dont want to control abortion, we want to have the same option to opt out of parenthood as women do. We dont want women to get paid less for the same work, we dont want to be shamed for women's choices in career and working hours eithe…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:13 PM
3

Patriarchy theory removes any and all agency women have had in the past and assigned it to men, then labeled men as oppressors. It says anything bad a woman might experience in her life is collectively mens fault and anything bad a man might experience in his life is his or also collectively mens fault. I can't an idea like that seriously.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:07 PM
2

So the second definition doesnt say much about mens rights and interests. If it was an equality movement, wouldn't it say it was both both genders?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:03 PM
6

NOW opposing default shared custody which would do wonders for men being alienated from their families, for starters. Theres a plethora of feminist organizations pushing for gender quotas in exec boardrooms, which would push qualified men out of boardrooms to fill positions with token women. Before I get blasted for that, I'm all for women in boardrooms....if they want to be there and they are every bit as qualified as their male counterparts. If they are pushed into there so a company avoids a …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:01 PM
32

Feminists like to point to the lack of women in executive positions, but they are eerily silent on the lack of women in shithole jobs or jobs with high mortality rates. That's the point.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:04 PM
1

All this data basically to say STOP TREATING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS SOMETHING ONLY MEN DO.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:14 PM
5

If you joke around with your male co-workers but you are very professional with your female co-workers, they could see that at sexism and harassment. You are building a report with the men but not the women. Ok, so you joke around with the women, too. They don't like your humor and they report you for sexual harassment. It's not clear. That's the problem. Sure, groping and grabbing is fairly obvious, but if an innocuous touch, even to get a woman's attention when she has her head phones in, coul…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:37 PM
2

The 10 commandments are pretty positive, as it gives a baseline in interactions between people. You can't look at the Bible and dismiss all of it because of Leviticus. Some of it can be dismissed, but some of it can be accepted.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:12 PM
2

That's better like you said, but still odd. Are people preemptively making the claims to protect themselves?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:50 PM
3

Have there been cases of males accusing females of sexual assault? Genuinely curious about how it goes down these days.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:58 PM
11

It's almost like men can be real victims instead of only women, despite the feminist narrative otherwise. Rape against women isn't anywhere near an epidemic, and it gets talked about on a lot of subs. Like you said, major news outlets and tv shows discuss rape against women frequently. Any show that deals with rape, almost always deals with a woman getting raped by a guy. It's a trope they use to show how despicable a guy is, and it's used all the time. There are rarely any shows that show a mal…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:25 PM
2

Andrew became increasingly jealous. He insisted on having access to Emma’s phone and computer and started obsessively reading all her emails and messages. This is bad behavior, arguably abusive not to let her have any privacy. It's not related to financial abuse however. Right, and it seems like she's insisting on his bad behavior. Based purely on what she's making a case for, he's a bad guy, but behaviors don't fall out of the sky. Why was he jealous? He was perfect at the beginning. Did he mag…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:07 PM
6

Any of the askreddit threads regarding rape for men has sufficient enough examples for me to conclude that everything listed on the woman's side applies to men. A lot of those responses involved having 1 or 2 drinks and blacking out and coming to a girl riding them. Girls demanding sexual acts and outright ignoring No's. Guys staying in places around people they don't really know and basically unable to really leave, and then dealing with a pushy girl, again, not taking No for an answer. So, yea…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:07 PM
2

How do you know if the people who deny this science is telling the truth about that other science? If a side isn't consistent about evidence, then its apparent they are following evidence when its convenient to their narrative.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 02:24 AM
9

Have you ever lashed out in anger after someone was being mean to you? Do you think this should make you unemployable? It depends on how you lash out. If you shout at the specific guy who was mean to you, and said some things you regret...you shouldn't be unemployable, especially if you make an apology for the things you shouldn't have said. If you lash out by call all members of the person who was mean to you's race "trash", and then did that for a fucking year, and then gave a non-apology "apo…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:38 PM
10

Didn't see any on her, but on the kid and the dad. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/toddler-coming-out-of-her-shell-almost-two-years-after-she-was-bashed/news-story/09bff1a781b45884b79c1e1b01cb30e4
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:44 PM
1

But I can see how folks in an purported AltRight sub think that abortion is bad and that essentially bad people with poor decision making rely on it. What does this mean? This isn't an alt right sub...are you just making this claim so you don't have to use your brain in a conversation? Hello, ad hominem, my old friend.... Anyway, you didn't address the point. No one is saying that abortions in the cases of pregnancy complications should be illegal. If people are, they should do a bit of research…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:11 PM
4

Maybe it's because they ban and shun anyone who doesnt agree with them, so the only people left around them are these allies. Since the allies are still "oppressors", they get the axe next.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:19 PM
2

You are referencing a very rare case though. The vast, vast...like not even remotely close...of abortions are oopsies, I had unprotected sex without birth control or I have birth control, I just take it like I should. The lady died due to really restrictive laws and doctors either being dumb or not wanting to risk their license. What should have been done was an amendment to the amendment where it's clear doctors can abort a fetus if the pregnancy risks a woman's life. What happened instead was …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 07:35 PM
5

Man...the goalposts were here...now they are way the hell over there! Its heavily looked down on but it's legal. When you draw lines in the sand like age of consent, you'll run into these issues. An 18 year is considered to have agency, so they can make the decision to date or not date a 40 year old. If it's their boss, they can choose to leave that job. Kids don't have a choice in going to school. I really don't know what you are arguing for. You want it to be ok for students to date teachers?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:48 AM
5

And it's the reason why we don't let teachers and students fraternize. The teacher has years of maturity not to mention authority over the student. The reason you can date in the office, is because there's a reasonable idea that all parties are mature enough to have their own agency. It's the reason we don't let minors vote or drink....they are too young for those responsibilities. If you cant understand these premises, we cant move forward in this conversation. Edit: I misread your example. The…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:21 AM
18

I was a teen, too, and of course I fantasized about teachers. The problem is that like I said earlier, it won't be like a fantasy. You may not want to stay behind and fool around, but you will. You may want to call it off, but she won't let you. If you do, your b turns to an f. Your homework mysteriously never got turned in. She let's it slip that you are being a stupid little perv. Your class mates start giving you that weird look. So, you ditch your friends to fool around, because she says so,…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:43 PM
32

You would, even if it wasn't on your terms? Like, you arent interested, but she says you'll perform or your grades suffer? Like, if you tell, she'll tell people you raped her? Keep telling yourself that buddy. Is it a fantasy? Yeah. Would you like for it to happen in reality? I doubt you would. Most guys that go through situations like that, that I've seen talk about it, hated the situation. There was no fantasy.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:55 PM
1

I mean, due to the severe lack of need for gender studies majors when colonizing, I'm pretty sure that were this to occur, it would happen naturally.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:53 PM
9

Well yeah, they gotta keep that number down by proxy banning people for posting on "toxic" subs. You make a post here that's pro-feminist, but is asking for an open-dialogue? Welcome to ban city from r/feminism, r/askfeminists, r/twoxcrhomosomes, etc. I'm glad we have more subscribers. I see very little banning and mod removal of comments, even some that are crass. The bad comments tend to get downvoted heavily, but there's a lot of open discourse here, which is way more important.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:05 PM
6

Yeah, that is pretty crappy. Both dumping the mother of his kids and getting involved with that car wreck of a family. I don't think she should be entitled to quarter million a month, though, when they both have joint custody.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:02 PM
22

AND she gets 15k from another dude she had a kid with. Why the hell does this chick need 250k a month plus 15k a month for child support from 2 fathers? Edit: I'm willing to bet heavily that she would be married to dad number 1 if she knew she wasn't getting squat if she left. She picked out a rich guy, got pregnant and a paycheck and dumped him. She picked out another rich guy and did the same. What a piece of work. Edit 2: Sorry this is still blowing my mind how this chick played the system. G…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:26 PM
38

The couple have joint legal and physical custody of the children. They have joint custody and he still has to pay a quarter mil a month. What the shit. AND he pays for the house for his ex and children to live in. So that quarter million isn't part of that. That's blowing my mind.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:10 PM
6

Or any of the other instances of rape, or talking about made to penetrate not being counted as rape, or guys out there waking up to some chick grinding on him, etc... Prison rape and student teacher rape are super low hanging fruit. I'm glad she talked about it, but those were pretty easy subjects to hit. She didn't risk any of her fame addressing those issues. I didn't like her insistence on false accusations being a non-issue. It's as or more common than actual rape, so if it's too rare to men…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:07 PM
11

It's a shame how many people think that.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:34 PM
12

Awesome. The very definition of inclusion, I like it.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:41 PM
1

It's very welcome. My wife and a few friends were heavy in the roller derby scene a few years ago, and derby was fairly popular back in Texas. The reason why it's not as wide spread is simply due to men being specifically built to do all these sports at a much higher level than women. I would love it if women were to be good enough to play any professional sports, but they aren't. I would love to see a women's pro softball league, but would it make enough to cover the cost of modifying the baseb…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:04 PM
7

No he didn't. He was moving up to what looks to be a very packed bar, and was pushed into her by the rest of the crowd. If punched everyone who bumped into me at crowded bars, I'd be in jail for assaulting like 50 people. People bump into each other at bars, deal with it. Kicking and punching because someone bumped into you is stupid.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 02:45 PM
7

It's an ugly scene, to be sure, but the only thing that I can see that did wrong was to hit back harder than she hit him. I disagree. He hit her hard enough to stop the violence coming his way. She didn't fall down, he didn't follow up with more hits, nothing on her broken except her pride. He hit her exactly as hard as he needed to. It looks bad, because it's a dude hitting a girl, but in reality, he stopped her from assaulting him at first and then popped her when she did assault him.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 02:42 PM
8

To be fair, aggravated stalking carries a sentence up to 5 years, so while, no, a guy wouldn't get 10 years, the full 5 is well within the possibility. It's also interesting she gets 60% the sentence of the maximum.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:02 AM
1

? Patriarchy theory is a core belief of modern feminism. The belief women are oppressed is also core. Advocacy for women's rights is core. There are no half truths about any of that.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 02:31 AM
4

Advocacy of women's rights on the basis that women are oppressed by the patriarchy. Everything I've seen from feminism on reddit or in the media supports this.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:51 AM
1

Yeah, I'll have sympathy for her trying to quit and falling off the wagon. Absolutely. All I'm saying is that Demi gets a ton of sympathy and whatnot, but we are giving someone sympathy who decided that hard drugs are fun...even with the widely accepted idea that drugs are bad. A dude gets into drugs and he's just a loser, a lady has mental health problems.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:25 PM
1

Women can absolutely be toxic and abusive in relationships too, but they are not socialized to do so. Is she saying women are naturally toxic and abusive, then? How misogynistic....
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:26 PM
1

I'm willing to bet Demi started doing drugs, because the drugs were fun and available. She may have developed depression after addiction, but she most likely got into money and decided to party it up.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:00 PM
3

Yup, plus the university may cave with just a threat of retaining counsel.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:53 PM
6

Relationship is over I think. You should turn that 'think' into something a bit more definitive. She's literally cheating on you and engaging severe emotional abuse. There is no future here. She's not going to give you children, not going to love and support you, not going to stay with you when times are tough. She is the antithesis to what a healthy relationship should be.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:31 PM
2

A lot of women don't see the privileges they've had their entire lives at all. It why a lot of women will walk through doors held open without acknowledging someone is holding the door open. Granted, that's rude regardless of sex and some guys do it, too. I think a large part of the feminist movement is down to this enormous blind spot.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 02:25 PM
3

It seems weird though. The story was written more like erotica than something that actually happened.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:49 PM
2

I wonder if the author will attempt to look at this from an open mind. 50.50 spent a fact-free weekend among anti-feminists at the International Conference on Men’s Issues, organised at an undisclosed location in London. Man, that didn't last long.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:04 PM
3

11-year old is totes not coached what to say by her obviously biased mom. Does the father have any say on whether or not the child is put into the spotlight?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 03:16 PM
7

Will she mow down a bunch of women, and then spare the men? If she has to kill a man, will she do it offscreen? Just being silly here, but I bet she'll kill a ton of dudes like normal.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:04 PM
8

autobans are one of the worst ideas I've come across. That autoban would have banned OP for posting, and we wouldn't be able to have a discussion with her. She would be trapped between 2 ideals who just autoban each other. If feminist subs want to autoban, they'll drive more and more people this way, and that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:45 PM
3

u/demmian is the mod over there and is just as likely to ban her for "trying to circumvent a mute" or whatever. I mean, OP should try anyway, and get the honorary ban we all know and cherish.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:43 PM
15

Read a few of the other answers to see the feminist talking points. "Women are majority victims of IPV, and even if that's not true, women are only beating their SOs to protect their children or in cases of self defense. Women were always oppressed and kept in their homes with 0 freedom, so they had the right to run those as they see fit!"
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:10 PM
20

I appreciate you fighting for men's rights; that's awesome. The feminists I've seen today overwhelmingly are against men's rights or only women's rights. They'll give lip service about men, but only in the context of helping out women will help men. You are in the minority of feminists that are for men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 06:08 PM
1

Yup. If this action continues and you have proof, you may be able to talk with a lawyer about going after the girl for libel/slander. I know we are talking early teens, but that might pressure on her parents to curb that behavior. Now, you'll probably get some shit for involving a lawyer, but getting shit for getting a lawyer involved is better than getting slandered.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:26 AM
1

So? I'm sure if we cut girls' genitals we could do it with only killing a small number of girls every year. But we don't need to cut girls. We don't need to cut boys. The only reason why women would be into circumcised boys is because most boys in western cultures are cut; most girls don't see uncircumcised guys. I mean, if circumcision was rare, women would prefer uncircumcised men with circumcised men being the weird ones.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 11:15 PM
2

"I'm jealous that people call Jordan Peterson a genius. I think that more women should be called genius, but how can they if they are doing administrative work in the jobs they applied for? I think if women weren't doing the jobs they applied for and did different jobs, they might be considered geniuses. Somehow this is men's fault. Also, I don't like that softer sciences don't get the same recognition as STEM fields." That's what I got out of this article.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 10:43 PM
1

Funny you say that. In the article, the dude getting punished makes a very similar comparison. I also wondered if when women violate the university's code of conduct, if they have to write papers on toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 09:53 PM
3

Call it a sexist insult and continue on with your point. The term is used to derail, but you don't have to derail. "That's toxic masulinity" "That's sexist. Anyway, here's more info about point A, B, and C. Do you have anything to address this or are you going to just use ad hominem attacks?" If you address it any longer than that, you'll be arguing about toxic masculinity and not the actual issue at hand.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 08:26 PM
2

How do you she obviously knows? I'd assume that most system administrators know to back up their stuff, but I've been to plenty of sites where SAs aren't backing anything up and they don't see the problem. I'd assume SAs would know to scavenge DNS records, but there are SAs out there with scavenging turned off and DNS records 10 years old. There is no way to determine the knowledge of others. Men share information...even if we know the other person might know it. If our information is wrong in a…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:38 PM
4

Yep. If it came out that women are not an oppressed minority, a lot of feminists would have a lot to lose. There'd be no need for affirmative action in favor of women. There'd be no need for gender studies, rather, the content of gender studies would have to change to something much less feminist. Equity jobs would be much less valuable, and a lot of women would be replaced by men. They cant risk that, so they push the gas pedal down wittle further.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 02:23 PM
7

Seems like the author is suggesting that men should view women as fragile things that could get their feelings hurt should you explain anything to them they might already know.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 02:18 PM
2

What's interesting is that a lot of pro-life policy makers do similar things for abortion clinics and feminsists think this is outrageous.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:59 AM
2

And if women do the naked, immovable starfish a lot of women love to use as their go to move? She can make out with you, rub your inner thigh, give you a blowjob and when it comes to sex, just lay there. Is that a yes? Or when she does that, do you need to stop and explicitly get her to say "yes"? If you got her doggy, and she'd just floating on the sensations, but not actively pushing back on you, should you pull out and gain another "yes"? If a woman is riding her guy, does he need to be thrus…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:52 AM
7

Date Jake. Avoid saying any express "yes's" to all the sex either of us initiate. Break up 2.5 years later after bragging about how great the relationship and sex is. See Jake dating a new girl. Get pissed. Let cops know all the sex didn't come with my "yes's". Laugh as Jake get sent to federal prison as a rapist. Buy a new cat.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:26 AM
1

Yeah. I'm not gonna lie. I was pretty doofy, and didn't know what an iron was. After meeting my wife, the looks and attention I got from women skyrocketed. Either I started noticing it, or just being a taken dude, I'm not sure which is more true.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:35 PM
2

You say that like it's that simple. Most men are stronger than women so if a woman doesn't want to give a man a blowjob but he physically forces her it's kinda difficult not to have a dick in your mouth even if you don't want it. Aziz Ansari is the poster boy of not being a big strong guy, and what you are talking about is rape. If Grace didn't want to be naked in the room with Anasari while giving him a blowjob, she shouldn't have stripped naked and inhaled his dick. I will say that being an ol…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:32 PM
1

Not every woman is the same so the fact is that no one technique will be 100% effective Yup. I've read to just say, "Hi" and be conversational. I've gotten many sneers from doing this. This whole, "just don't be a creep" thing is just bullshit. No two girls will be able to fully agree on what being a creep even means. Women don't even truly know how to approach women, so like you said, who the hell teaches the guys?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 05:17 PM
10

It isn't just with him. My wife had a mentoring program at her old job, and even back in 2009, she talked with an executive VP about this. He won't risk a sexual assault claim, and he doesn't want the rumor mill to go wild on him being alone with women. My wife had the same problems...how will women get the same opportunities as the guys if the women don't get the 1 on 1 time? Women are asking men to risk their career for theirs. Unless a mutually beneficially circumstance arises, men won't do i…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:46 PM
3

I keep coming back to this. If we indeed live in a patriarchy that legit oppresses women, it is the most idiotic and worthless patriarchy ever. At the very worse, it's like a passive aggressive patriarchy, that mumbles ,"No, you're stupid..." underneath its breath. AC oppression? Legs too far apart oppression? Talking to women in a way they find patronizing? Get the hell out of here. If women in most western countries are oppressed, can I also be oppressed?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:23 AM
8

Or a consensual relationship where the person begs you to fuck her in the ass....AND still be accused of rape. Looking at you mattress girl.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:26 PM
3

Yup...100% agree
/r/MensRights10/07/18 10:38 PM
4

If the girls are threatening her and pushing it at her, I could see the little girl being frightened. ....especially if she's not getting any soothing afterward. I'm not saying the girls didn't taze the child. I'm just saying a 1 year old being terrified of stuff isn't evidence of abuse. Now...being mocked and refused positive attention is abuse.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 10:12 PM
4

Eh... 1 year olds can be scared of anything. My daughter around 1 year of age was terrified when my buddy laughed around her. They feel everything way more intensely than adults, so even if it's something just a little bit scary, that little scary is a huge scary. It's also why something not very funny is absolutely hysterical to a infant or toddler. I'm not excusing the teens' behavior; its reprehensible. They took advantage of the 1 year old's intense feelings to get this reaction. I would nev…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:44 PM
14

Also...the guys play way more games.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 08:47 PM
21

The dude is 92...I'm worrying this might put him down for good.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 01:49 AM
1

People defending Sarah C: Bu-bu-but she didn't say all men! She just said "men". Yeah, she didn't say some men, either. She put the onus of rape on men as a whole and got called out for it.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:05 AM
3

The gimp was funny...the innie minnue miney moe was funny. The rape was more "look how fucked up these guys are" than funny.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 05:42 PM
8

Lol right? It's crazy how some people end up with the counter argument that blows their own argument out of the water....in their own argument.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 08:04 PM
114

Yes, absolutely. Gendering bad behaviors is pointless, and the only reason why it was gendered in the first place was to make an "us" and "them" paradigm. "They" have toxic masculinity, and as feminists, we can use this definition however we see fit to shame them and shut down actual conversations. If feminists legit thought toxic masculinity was bad and legit wanted to fix, they never would have used the words 'toxic masculinity' to fix it.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:12 PM
7

What's best for the child is for them to be a functional member of society and a person capable of having children of their own and raise them successfully. Let's start with that standard. With 2 parent households, you are much more able to successfully achieve this goal than a single parent household. You have more resources to feed, clothe, shelter and educate this child. You have more attention to monitor and guide the child. A single parent has much less time, resources, energy, patience, an…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 01:33 PM
1

Especially if the story involved finding the cure, and the heroines trying to get their men back.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:11 PM
1

There are no feminists on a sinking ship. If your only problems are men staring at you or the ac is too cold, then those are your worst problems. I think most of feminism has an issue with perspective.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 10:53 PM
1

It sucks you went through that, but the attractiveness of the girls doing this to you and your use of tradcon probably got you the downvotes. Or the thread got brigades by a few people who just dv'd everything they could find.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:12 AM
30

Emotional labor is feminists complaining about having to do adult things.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:53 PM
2

The feminist response is because a guy fucks you while you are drunk, and a car doesn't drive you when you are drunk. Basically, women never ever give out signals or initiate sexual acts either sober or drunk, therefore, women hold no responsibility for sex.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:16 PM
11

I read the Twitter responses and just about all are calling buzzfeed on their shit. So that's refreshing. Still a crap article.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 01:23 PM
1

Cassie Jaye and Paul Elam come to mind. Paul is still used as a tool to bludgeon MRAs just from his satirical article, where Cassie gets a huge pass. Theres a post from today when a woman stood up in a womans only forum to advocate for men. Men were banned from that forum, and she was listened to. Its conjecture to say that a man doing the same would be ridiculed and ousted, with his job in jeopardy, but it's definitely within the scope of possibility. Besides, I'm not saying men shouldn't fight…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 01:48 AM
1

The way I meant it and should have clarified is that when men fight for equality, they are overwhelmingly viewed as hostile sexists...which anyone who hangs around here can confirm. Yes we can fight, but we'll get much better results when women do that fighting for us.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 12:48 AM
1

Could hardwick developed this abusive pattern with Chloe? Yeah people change and shit happens Yeah, that possibility exists, but he'd have to be a great partner for over 15 years and at least 3 different women say so, be a douchebag purely to Chloe, and then back to being great for his current wife. I mean, yes....a possibility exists for that to happen, but it's really unlikely. A more likely thing is that he was a decent partner to Chloe, obviously not perfect, but a decent partner. She cheats…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:20 PM
5

"To keep a man happy, keep his stomach full and balls empty. Any of you ladies fulfilling that end of the bargain?" That's probably a bit inflammatory, but maybe you could follow it up with, "I'm only partially kidding there. Sure, he should make you happy. Are you making him happy? A sad handjob once a year for your anniversary doesn't count...."
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:06 PM
12

I agree that both of these people were dumb. She was dumb for taking obviously expensive "I'm interested in you romantically" gifts, and he was dumb for taking her "No" as "Maybe...if you spend more money on me". I think her agency started when she said she wanted to just be friends, and I think she had the responsibility to say no to the things he bought her. Small stuff? That's fine. Friend give small gifts all the time. Expensive jewelry? Flights to NYC? Nope. She has to be really stupid or o…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 06:02 PM
2

I mean, maybe, but I read his text and her texts. His was, "you broke my heart by cheating. I know I'm not perfect, but that doesn't excuse what you did." No calls to violence, no slander, just closure. Her's were her begging to talk with him and be back with him. I know that some abused will beg to come back. But 7 months later? Her story reaks of "I want attention." She says she has proof, but she's not going to the cops? This is just like Aziz. If she had evidence of wrong doing, she would ha…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:49 PM
2

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf The problem is that when men start treating women equally, they are almost universally viewed as being hostile sexists. Both men and women view men who treat women with benevolent sexism as egalitarian. This problem is the main reason why egalitarian train of thought is widely avoided by both sexes. It's the reason why this sub is dubbed a hate group by feminists and even people who don't prescribe to feminism. Until people r…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:44 PM
4

Quote from the article. Seems legit. The dude has no filter and gives no fucks.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:05 AM
3

They don't want to put forth the idea that arming their populace, even with tasers, would make criminals think twice about burglaries, because then they'd have to admit that perhaps taking away guns was a bad idea.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 06:58 PM
4

Archive link: http://archive.is/HAh46 Why didn't any of these 25 groups push to be in this event before they went all female? Why did it take men not being invited for these women to get the stones to play? I mean, what does this say about these female musicians that they will only come forward to play if there's no male musicians allowed? Who are the real sexists here?
/r/MensRights28/06/18 06:56 PM
1

Then the diversity hires will fail, and blame it on a bad work environment. People who might have criticized those diversity hires will need to sit through diversity seminars. Then those people, the people with actual talent, will just leave.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:32 PM
3

If women were the lesser gender, then why were they protected at a much higher rate than males? This "lesser gender" line of thinking almost always compares very high status men to normal or low status women. Why don't you compare men and women in the same class? If you are going to use historical 'facts' as reasons for your movement today, then you need to be factually accurate. Also, it's a bit rich calling this an echo chamber, when most feminist dominated subs actively ban people for merely …
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:30 PM
3

haha, that's awesome. Short and succinct.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 05:17 PM
67

And then followed it up: "However, I am prepared to rephrase my comments. I strongly urge Senator Hanson-Young to continue shagging men as she pleases."
/r/MensRights28/06/18 03:27 PM
11

Or even low paying. Men are willing to do jobs that are necessary for civilization to function.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:02 PM
1

Regurgitate the opinions or give neutral responses. Keep your head down and get your work done. Fight the battles worth fighting, and fighting against sjws at work isn't one of them battles. Use your time working there to find another job where you fit. No jobs out there like gaps in employment history, and it makes you look bad if you choose not to work because you won't get along with the staff. For the issues with depression and past bullying, I suggest you talk with a therapist. I will also …
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:24 PM
5

Sarah Wood-Heath, a family solicitor with Wilsons, the London law firm that analysed the figures, said: “More disputes over access to children is something of an unexpected side-effect of the trend towards more men taking responsibility for the care of their children. With many fathers feeling they should be playing an important role in the upbringing of their children, we are seeing more cases go to court.” Sorry, but how is this unexpected? Fathers taking more responsibility want more access t…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:50 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG3K5346Uag
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:07 PM
5

Most sjw's I've ran across are incredibly sexist and racist. They handwave away agency and power that people have, and they infantilize women while slandering men.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:05 PM
209

"Seriously, though. Women can't rape men. Like, how? They are so much bigger and stronger, there is no way to force a man to have sex unless he really wants to." You see, if you have a machete, it doesn't particularly matter....
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:39 PM
2

Far fewer men in Urban areas. The men that are in Urban areas, tend to be married more than the women there.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:19 PM
1

"Being in a wheelchair is still better than being you."
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:10 AM
145

Say what you want about deaf kids.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:30 AM
7

Look at what happens to those that question the dogma. They get ostracized, threatened, slandered, you name it. If you are a feminist, and you say, "Hold up, according to these recent studies, men are victims of DV at nearly the same rate as women.", then you just earned a 1 way ticket to banishment from the fold. Laci Green said that she would sit down and talk with people on the right, and she got blasted by the rest of feminism. Warren Farrell was a prominent feminist leader, and he was ouste…
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:13 PM
2

IIRC, teaching women how to handle themselves when facing a potential rapist and teaching women how to avoid situations that put themselves at risk drastically lowers rape occurrences. Of course both sexes should be taught how to handle themselves when they face certain circumstances, such as rape, mugging, assault, etc. This, to me, is a no-brainer. Also of course, people should be taught to respect a persons's non-consent and to not hurt others.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:53 PM
6

Where you at Clem Ford? Any words on the amount of murders your benevolent, innocent women in Australia commit? Or is there no room in your narrative on how domestic violence is only something men do to women?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:48 PM
0

It's probably not, but it's type 1 and 2 feminists saying these things. Neither of these feminists see anything wrong with what other says, and they don't bother policing the hypocrisy. If you point it out, you get the No True Scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:28 PM
1

Either that, or they slander you, and then block you. Had a few conversations where when they are losing the argument, they throw an insult about my character out followed up swiftly by either blocking or banning. Easy to 'win' an argument when you kick your opponent in the shin and run away with the ball.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:08 PM
3

Well yeah. A lot of stereotypes are really beneficial to women. Losing those benefits feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 12:17 AM
187

That Quora post from a day or two ago succinctly explains this. Different type of feminists being vocal at different times, and neither of those groups policing each other. Feminism turns into "an equality movement for everyone, so don't you dare start your own" AND "a movement specifically for women, so don't you dare bring up men's issues". Shrodinger's feminism. Both an equality movement and specifically a women's only empowerment movement at the same time.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:30 PM
5

They had some lady that basically told police to up the amount of rape convictions. So to do that, they ignored clear evidence of innocence and doctored other evidence to make the accused appear guilty.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:05 PM
1

Why doesn't she just be a better gladiator, then? The obvious answer is, she can't and won't. It's easier to blame failures on an unfair system than to admit poor performance.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:00 PM
1

The issue about women voting in men and political representation, I've found this to be more about women candidates not running as often as men. Last time I checked, women made up between 20 and 25% of candidates and hold 20-25% of the political seats. If they want more representation, they merely need to run more.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:45 PM
1

Did you?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:16 PM
1

Not Miss America, but the F1 girls got let go due to feminist crap, and they were losses about it. I remember a tv show where they had like 3 F1 girls on with a feminist. The feminist was sooooo sexist towards them, and all the girls were like "this is my choice, I get paid for my time, why are you taking this away from me" The feminist response was basically "you are too dumb to know better." If the girls in the pageant don't want to do it, then they don't have to do it. If they want to do it, …
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:07 PM
5

I've used the women's bathroom to cha he my kid a couple times. Never had a problem. I even had 1 lady that came in, went to pee, a whilst doing her business said "you go dad!". Anyone having a problem with a dude using the ladies changing table needs a full lobotomy.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:31 PM
3

I think MRAs accept women that do have problems and issues, but we also question the validity of those issues. IE....is cat calling that big of a deal? I'm sure to the women that get it excessively, it is, but there shouldn't be legislation against it. Abortion is a huge issue, yet saying there's value in the unborn immediately puts you at odds with feminism. They want access to birth control that they already have access to, but what they really mean, is they want it for free. Women face their …
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:21 PM
13

Plus OPs son 100% needs to be no where near some strange dude who's only there to get his dick wet. OP...get a journal and document everything. Dates you pick your son up, the state of your ex, ie, drunk, high or whatever, all communication with your ex, etc. Everything. Get as much communication recorded with her, especially promises of custody agreements. Lawyer up. Do not talk shit about your ex to your kid. Document what your ex tells your son. You want primary custody...you do not want your…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:58 PM
1

No generally speaking rape is statistically not counted like that, Because then you would also include the vast numbers of women who are passively pressured into sex I wonder if because a lot of people who use the study use the federal definition of rape that actively excludes female perpetrators and male victims of said perpetrators. I wonder where the federal law got it's definition of rape from. It couldn't have gotten it from the Violence Against Women Act. Surely, an act named as such would…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:25 AM
3

This is the clem ford logic of "out of 1000 rape claims, 2% are verifiably false, ergo the rest are 100% true."
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:15 AM
86

12 hours later: Are men these days too lazy?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:04 PM
9

No, not at all. Absolutely not. All rape is terrible, and the majority of men who suffer rape suffer it at the hands of men. When counting made to penetrate as rape, the perpetrators are around 70% women, so what are you talking about? Women DO rape men, but due to very careful wording in our laws, they don't get listed as rapists due to a lack of penis. This isn't to say that rape isn't an issue that affects men, but rather instead of inventing statistics and pretending like women rape men, we …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:12 PM
9

Society already hammers it home that men do bad things. It also glosses over when women do bad things, and sure enough, the moment someone attempts to hold these women accountable for being terrible, someone like shows up to remind us of crap we already know. Then you use that to bludgeon your opposition into silence. I guess to you, it's a condolence to male rape victims that other men rape women. If you want to talk oppression, women are the only oppressed class of people in history that have …
/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:55 PM
2

Where else do you plow 'em? I thought the classroom was standard?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:27 PM
3

And any feminist march or protest. And any time anyone who isn't a die hard feminist has am event on college campuses. And killallmen tweets. Etc ad nauseam. Like really? There's no evidence feminists behave more negatively toward men? I suppose so.....if you are blind deaf and dumb.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:12 PM
2

Ah yes, good catch.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 10:33 PM
3

It didn't help with the APLC SPLC listing this sub as a hate group. I seriously wanna know the metrics they use to make these determinations.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:06 PM
3

Article is seriously lacking in details. Probably issues with getting info, but why does it seem when there's a sexual assault case, we have floods of details about what exactly went down? Why is it when there's cases like this, there's pretty much a "Whelp, she lied about something. That's it."? Am I falling to confirmation bias here?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 05:02 PM
1

That's the thing. I've seen other articles that complain, specifically in the workplace, that it's harassment if you don't interact with women. I can see the future: "Hello, Debra. How are you. That's nice. I'm obligated to invite you to lunch. I wish you well. May I have your permission to go to my desk and continue work? Thank you. Also, happy secretary's day."
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:38 PM
3

I hate that you had to go through that. It's shitty when it happens to any parent when the other uses the kids as tools. I would be devastated if my wife left and turned my daughter against me. I also hate that there's 1 program for 1 sex and nothing for the others. Why make it gendered at all? I hope you are able to push through all this and I hope your kids realize the truth.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:13 PM
6

OR when she was sentenced with assault the first time, that would have been a pretty good time to remove her custody of the child she later stabbed.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 10:04 PM
7

Society already knows men can be violent. There's already a ton attention and judges throw the books at men for being violent. Society, on the other hands, treats women with kid gloves. Man kills his daughter? He's a monster. Woman kills her son? Well, you see, she had mental issues stemming from her own abuse when she was a kid, and she had a drug dependency and she was dumped by the son's father, etc. This sub points out the huge discrepancies in....just about anything. As long as policies kee…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 10:03 PM
2

The judge can order whatever, but if the police don't enforce the order, it's not worth the paper it's printed on. A lot of women ignore custody orders without any repercussions.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 05:06 PM
14

Feminists: "Come on, we don't want more rights, we just want equal rights." Also Feminists: "We want anything critical of specific women to be considered misogyny, and we want misogyny to be considered a hate crime." Any feminists browsing here, can you answer these questions for me.... How does this help women? If anything critical of a woman could be considered a hate crime, why would men interact with women? How would a man mentor a woman at a job, if part of that mentoring might involve bein…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 03:20 PM
2

http://www.vogue.co.uk/article/the-fight-to-make-misogyny-a-hate-crime
/r/MensRights31/05/18 03:05 PM
2

Yup. It would be interesting to see which groups would also be listed as hate groups if SLPC would apply their metrics without bias. I bet /feminism would pitch a fit to be smeared with such a label.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:36 PM
7

Feminists control the narrative of rape in order to maintain men as defacto rapists and women as defacto victims. If it ever got out that men get raped at similar rates that women do, with women as the primary perpetrators, they would lose ALOT of support, and by extension, money.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:32 PM
5

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:13 AM
1

Victimhood complex. Look at the feminist narrative of "everything a man does can be considered harassment. Harassment is the patriarchy keeping women down. You have to fight the patriarchy at every turn.* Reporting this guy is her fighting back against this patriarchy. She doesn't believe men should say anything even remotely offensive to or about women. She thinks men saying these things deserve punishment. If every man would stop saying offensive things, then finally, women would have equality…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:29 AM
0

Unfortunately for Ms James, other users on the Facebook page disagreed with her and accused her of overreactingovaryacting. Fixed.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:46 PM
1

The feminist narrative says that out of 1000 rapes, only around 80 see prison. So many of them are dropped due to lack of evidence or retraction. The failure of their logic is assuming all 1000 are actual rapes and it's society actively protecting rapists from seeing prison time. This is faulty. Out of 1000 rape claims around 80 are actually found to be true, but around 20-80 are found to be probably false. The false accusation rape almost mirrors the actual rape rape. So if they think false cla…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:40 PM
1

Argue back, but use tact. Ask them if it's ok to dismiss their opinions because they are silly women. If that's a propoesterous notion, then it's equally ridiculous to assume a man can't have an opinion. Being fat is unattractive and unhealthy. It shows a distinct lack of self control and discipline. Both sexes find self control and discipline attractive, so to tell a guy he's got no say is flat out stupid. Anyone who advocates otherwise just wants to be fat without repercussions.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:07 PM
1

You also had a decent shot of not carrying on your genes.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 08:57 PM
2

True but it tarnishes your argument when you start out with ad-hominem. We are smart cookies here; we can make our own decision about these publications' hatred of men.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:42 AM
4

So he's a registered sex offender because an old step daughter made a false claim. The step daughter comes forward in 2013 to insist this never happens. This case references him being a registered sex offender....but that offense never happened. I don't like the sex offender registery, mainly due to this. You can have case appealed and thrown out. You can have new evidence brought and have your conviction over turned. But the registry seems like it's forever. You get on the registry and fail to …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:11 AM
1

Lena Dunham and Amy Schumer both admitted to sexually assaulting people, Lena her sister and Amy a college crush, and literally no one cared.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:08 PM
1

The sad thing is that I've found articles very similar to this. They blame men looking anywhere but to women for fulfillment, aka "toxic masculinity" for women not being able to find mates. At no point do they question a horrendous family court system or ridiculous expectations of women. I'm guessing they won't blame backwards-ass rape laws the next time they write their birthrate articles.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:19 AM
1

I'm not saying a rape occurred. I'm saying an overly enthusiastic DA might be able to make a case, if not for rape, for sexual assault. I'm saying the information should go to a defense team before the cops. When they come after you, they may charge you with like 5 crimes, and you may not be guilty of all of them. You may, however, be guilty of a minor offense, and then you'll be on the sexual offense registry forever. Having this info go to a defense team first may be the difference between lif…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:13 PM
1

The patriarchy works in mysterious ways. One person's dirty bunghole is another person's oppression.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:06 PM
10

Website that 'listens and believes', basically, orginal 'story' https://web.archive.org/web/20180523183549/https://newsone.com/3801180/texas-state-tropper-assault-sherita-dixon-cole/
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:36 PM
10

It shows another spotlight on the fallacy that women are innocent creatures incapable of doing horrible things. When Clem Ford and other prominent feminists get off on spouting the numbers of women being killed by their abusive male partners, this shows that it's not just men who can be terrible. Feminists use terrible instances of male violence as their reasons for pushing for legislation that benefits women and shits on men. I'm in no way saying we need to turn around and shit on women. What w…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:17 PM
154

2 years later: Swedish birthrates fall to another record low. What can we do to get Swedes to have babies? Is the Patriarchy to blame? Single women in early 30's say men fear approaching them and men need to "Man Up!"
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:09 PM
1

when we can barely obtain safety for our bodies, let alone our working environments? What the fuck are you talking about? I hate this argument. Who is threatening your bodies? No one is, that's who. Some people do bad things. You don't get to claim victimhood on shit that happens to other people.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:44 PM
1

Specifically, if I understood it correctly, there is more pressure on the female to make sure her mate doesn't stray. The basis of a female-specific PV aetiology is that pair-bonding is now known to have evolved in the female interest to maximise female fertility, and therefore at root women have a stronger interest in preventing partner defection “ manifesting in controlling behaviour which may become violent ” whereas at root men would have little to lose if not something to gain.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:34 PM
1

“USC is committed to maintaining an environment that is free from discrimination and that encourages fair treatment of all students, faculty, and staff, a value that is emphasized in university policies,” she added. ....... If you don't want to discriminate...why do you have so many programs that discriminate? Or do you just feel that discriminating against men isn't discrimination?
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:23 PM
1

The debt imbalance is there due to women going to freakin' college at a higher rate than men. It's not sexism to have more education than your male peers....you just have to pay for that education.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:59 PM
1

To play devil's advocate here, she said, "Although he never actually raped me, one time I had a bit to drink and didn't fully give consent for sex, should I go to the police?" Emphasis mine. Now, I'm not a lawyer, but if she said they had sex and she didn't consent, OP might be handing over evidence that a prosecutor could use against the accused. The justice department will use evidence against you, not necessarily for you. This evidence may be useful for the defense lawyer, but I don't know ab…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:57 PM
3

I got banned from r/askfeminists the first time for saying that not all women were oppressed all the time. The second time was for telling someone that if they went against the feminist narrative, they would be banned.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/18 03:18 PM
2

? r/askfeminists will ban you and r/feminism and r/twox will ban you by proxy. Those are toxic subs.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:00 PM
2

There's power in victimhood. If you don't succeed, instead of putting on your try-hard boots, you claim you are a victim of sexism. BOOM! Here's sympathy! Here's money for college! Here's affirmative action! Here's a shelter if you find yourself homeless! Here's money and resources to help you! You have a trash personality and you can't get a partner? Claim sexism! BOOM! Now it's not your fault that men don't like you, it's misogyny! It's not your fault that you cheated on your prior boyfriends,…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:59 PM
59

subjected to this kind of witch hunt. That's the thing, going after these feminist organizations for discrimination isn't a witch hunt. There's blatant evidence they discriminate in huge ways. Heavily favoring women, even when men are struggling, isn't some vague problem. They want to talk about oppression while sitting on a pillar of privilege. It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't have the ear of the government. If feminists want to be an equality movement, they should be held accountable when …
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:24 PM
26

With such significant risks, it's no wonder guys will be choosier than they used to.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:49 PM
30

And yet domestic violence services in Australia think this would never ever happen.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:41 PM
12

Thinking about finances also isn't unpaid work. Stressing about what to do for dinner isn't unpaid work. All the crap that feminists push they think is unpaid work is just being an adult, and it's absolutely insane to think they should be paid for it.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:37 PM
3

Could you please cite "their theoretical frameworks and explanations for sexism" Patriarchy theory is their theory that everything bad that happens to a woman is Patriarchy. Everything that women do that's bad is Patriarchy. Everything men do that is bad is Patriarchy. Everything men do that is good for women, actually infantilizes them and is therefore Patriarchy. If a man commits suicide, because his ex-wife withholds his child, that's due to Patriarchy. If a woman commits a murder suicide to …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:18 PM
4

Go back further. They wanted to change default custody from men to women in the late 1800s. This whole "women get custody because they are seen as default caregivers" notion is crap. Women get custody, because of early efforts by, and I'm sure they didn't call themselves feminists back then, feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:10 PM
5

It is interesting that it's her body, but it's not his body that's working for 21 years or he goes to jail.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:46 PM
1

Well, that time when she popped off to the bathroom? Yeah, she banged 2 guys on the way.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:15 PM
3

Will they ban songs with a misandrist theme?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:59 PM
12

SPLC is a hate group in itself. I wonder if it sees it's own hipocracy?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 08:54 PM
3

Thank ya. I now remember commenting in there. It was absurd. Just about any question about male victims were ignored. The ones that were, referenced the Duluth Model and used 'her' for victims.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:50 PM
2

Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:35 PM
8

The focus of men upset about bullshit narratives recognize bullshit narratives. Recognizing bullshit does not mean people are incels.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:59 AM
19

Famous feminists spouts killallmen frequently. She gets selected as keynote speaker for suicide prevention. MRAs sign a petition to get her removed due to her misandrist speech. u/Starik655321 "hur dur, these guys must be incels" Very smooth logic there.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 08:35 PM
11

Then will you condemn the women that murder their male partners, iirc, at a rate of 1 every other week? Will you condemn women that committ infanticide at a rate above and beyond men? Will you address the female on male violence that is also very prevalent but gets almost zero recognition? Or does none of that matter because very very few women die to domestic violence? 1 a week is 52 a year in a country of how many millions? If you are really concerned with women dying in droves, will you stop …
/r/MensRights15/05/18 06:21 PM
1

Incels are Incels because they are ugly. That's not necessarily true, though. They are incels, because mainly personality. Sure, following rules 1 and 2 is a big chunk of it, but guys can get to where they follow rules 1 and 2 through working out, dressing well, proper hygiene, etc. Having a good sense of humor plus all that, and even if it looks like you got hit in the face with a hot frying pan, you'd not be an incel. Incel can be tall and handsome, but if they have a poor attitude and poor ou…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:20 PM
1

I'm not necessarily blaming either. I know why the guys are checking out, and I know that my daughter would want to marry a man that will treat her well. With the way everyone is shitting on men, I can't condemn guys who avoid marriage; I completely understand it. If I were single, I don't know if I'd pursue a relationship. She could easily just find an Incel and ask him to marry her but her biology won't let her. Why are incels incels? It's not because they are amazing guys with solid personali…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 06:11 PM
1

the saddest thing is the people who did actually get raped are now in a much worse situation trying to come forward The saddest thing is the guys that get fucked over. The second saddest thing is how much harder it is for women to come forward. Not by much, mind you, but that should be the order. The direct victims on these false accusations deserve the main amount of support, not the secondary, potential victims that haven't come forward yet.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:02 PM
14

I don't know if they care or if they think you can't be sexist to men. Possibly both. I don't know why think they can use slanderous terminologies and expect anything positive in return. "I should be able to talk shit to people, and then those people should give me votes!"
/r/MensRights14/05/18 03:35 PM
5

So instead of teaching women to stand up for themselves, we double down on victim mentality, not for justice, but to get that rape conviction rate higher. Lazarus was a douche, that is true. Seems like a dude to pump and dump, however, that doesn't necessarily make him a felon. An enthusiastic consent law would not have stopped what happened to this girl from happening. A backbone would have. Instead of freezing up and doing nothing, her telling him "No" loudly and yanking her arm away from him …
/r/MensRights14/05/18 03:24 PM
4

I agree. There's also the issue with having to relive the process while going through the investigation. Now, arguably, facing what happened and talking about it should actually help with the healing process, if the investigators do it in a proper way. I'm musing over the possibility that anyone who goes into a rape investigation with zero shame, might not have actually been raped. I think there's a possibility that someone who casually makes a rape claim, probably never went through it. So, how…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:53 PM
8

6' 3" married with a daughter and this concerns me as well. In 20 years, what will the world look like if it keeps going this direction? I would like grandchildren, and I would like my daughter to be married when she has them. If men keep checking out of the mating pool, she may not get that chance. Of course it's her choice on having kids, but I do want there to be good men out there for her to date. I don't want there to be a choice of Chad with 12 kids across 11 different women and MGTOWs. No…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:14 PM
10

Neither are women. The entitlement is still irrelevant. Men are killing themselves, and that is partly due to the inability to find a mate. I'm willing to bet you wouldn't be so cavalier about the issue if women were killing themselves as often and the reason being men don't want them as mates. No one here is saying that men are entitled to sex. Men should have the opportunity to start a family, though, just like women should have that same opportunity. As it stands, a woman has very solid oppor…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:04 PM
4

I'm with you. I agree with a lot of what she's talking about, and then she throws a jab at men....why? You had it coming! If these guys had no part in anything, they have nothing coming.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 04:20 PM
3

He's not even remotely saying that. You are misrepresenting what he is saying...almost as if you are insisting he's a rapist in disguise trying to get away with rape.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:03 PM
3

I was waiting for someone on the feminist side to mention that making things better for women would make things better for men too. In. What. Way? Getting rid of the pay gap via enforcement, because let's be real here, that's the only way to really get pay equality between the sexes, you'll hurt a lot of men. Women, overall, aren't interested in what it takes to make those salaries, so you'll have to come down on men. Making the rape rate get to 0? That'll pretty much preclude any male avoiding …
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:28 PM
5

How does any of this help women, truly? All it does is push a narrative that women are infants in the workforce. If you want women to have respect in the workforce, then don't dumb down requirements, specifically to attract them. If women want to work and ask for promotions, nothing is stopping them.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:39 PM
8

EL OH EL The only person pushing that incel crap is....YOU. YOU spouted that bullshit in a thread of what looks to be a reasonable discussion of hierarchy, egalitarianism and the affects of both on mating. Women were denied responsibility! It wasn’t a trade off that women made, rights for responsibility. Like when the suffragettes wanted the right to vote, but most women said they didn't. Most women didn't want universal right to vote because they thought it would come with obligated service. Wo…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:03 PM
5

Not having to travel miles away from the safety of your village to face wild animals isn't oppression. Women had their own issues they needed to deal with, and pregnancy was a huge risk for women back then. Stop twisting stuff to fit a narrative. If men forced women to go out and hunt, you'd say women were oppressed, because they had to spend days away from home in the wild while men had a comfy life back at home. Both sexes filled a niche and worked together to build society. Some men, a huge m…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:07 PM
6

Most men couldn't vote, either. When women got the right to vote, it opened up voting for the rest of the men that couldn't vote. You know, those guys had obligated service attached to their vote, whereas women had no such thing, but that's besides the point. Women could vote before suffrage, they just had to be a land owner. Anyone who voted had to be a land owner, which put a lot of men out of voting rights as well. Sure, women were oppressed through history, but so was the guy right next to h…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:58 PM
2

I think there was a study out there that said what she wears does matter, but not like the narrative says. Women dressed provocatively tend to have more self esteem, and men actively looking for targets avoid them. They look for more subdued women, that might not have the courage or self esteem to stand up for themselves. I will say in cases of 2 parties mutually drinking and there's a consent issue, the dress doesn't matter and women have responsibility there. If they know their inhibitions go …
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:32 PM
1

Why do they need to be arbitrarily equalized? As long as women have the freedom to choose whatever they want to do, nothing needs to be equalized.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:20 PM
0

It's representative enough, because in those large cities, there's plenty of non-manual labor jobs that pay well for women to do. I'd reckon that in other places, there's a lot of opportunity for cash, but there's not a lot of those non-manual labor jobs. It could also be that women in cities are more ambitious to earn more money, and women in smaller cities or rural areas don't care for those jobs nor have that ambition. I think 150 of the largest cities is a good representative for women who a…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:17 PM
2

That and did she ignore all the men she made more than? Yes, yes she did.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:51 PM
6

Rather, 2 scientists with the exact same qualifications, 1 male one female, apply for a job. The woman accepts the 87k starting salary. The man won't accept less than 100k. He starts with 13k more salary. 1 year later, she accepts a 3% raise, he argues for a 4% raise. 5 years later, he asks for the promotion, she doesn't. 20 years later, he's making a quarter mil, she's making a little over 6 figures. My wife proved this in her last job. Everyone sat around, accepting 2 and 3% raises, and she wo…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:44 PM
8

If you just count made to penetrate as rape, the numbers almost equalize. Tack on prison rape and it's very slanted towards men as victims.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:36 PM
7

"Enthusiastic consent is really easy to determine, and I think if you don't have that, then you're not good to go. If you don't want to have sex with someone, you need to make it clear. If you want to have sex with someone, you need to make it clear. Doing nothing while a guy flirts with you, invites you outside, kisses you, puts your hands on a wall, pulls down your pants, starts having sex with you, finishes having sex with you, and then asks to put your name in his phone under a trophy list s…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:32 PM
61

Not all women kill their children but ALL women have the potential to kill them. They all have that ability while men don't. That's why we're afraid of you. I didn't even like typing that out, because it's that terrible of a thought. Why do some women think typing the above is ok?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:47 PM
3

You are good, man. I really wish you the best. Taking emotion out of it, I'm harboring a guess you have child support for child 1, you probably don't want child support on 2.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:37 PM
3

little 'r' for the link. r/maledomesticviolence
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:52 PM
9

Oh, and when child 2 comes, insist on a DNA check. There is a chance, however slim, that it's not yours. Don't assume.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:27 PM
1

I work in a male dominated industry with a proven wage gap that factors in seniority, hours worked, etc. Women are paid less for equal roles and underrepresented in leadership roles, most minority groups of both sexes are vastly underrepresented across all levels. There is a lot of sexism. Do any of those women also make more than other men, factoring in seniority, hours worked, etc? All all women at the bottom of the pay range, or do they sit around the middle? Do you account for whether or not…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:55 PM
1

Schrodinger's Snot? Both a miracle of life and a ball of snot at the same time.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:36 PM
3

As women take control behind the scenes, they're beginning to influence the characters and stories we see on screen. Which means more female characters with 0 flaws telling men off and doing all the things perfectly (while the male counterparts fumble through stuff). Such entertaining shows those are.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:32 PM
2

That's why they paint the discussion that way. If they paint the discussion as "is the fetus a human being with inherent rights" they then have to defend killing off the fetus as a right. The first one, they can paint anyone who disagrees as evil. That's also why they dehumanize the fetus. I talked with one feminist that believes until the baby comes out, it's just a blob of snot. Not only was she ok with abortion, she was happy she got rid of her snot. If the fetus is just a glob of snot, there…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:34 PM
4

The problem as I see it is that what some people call “convenience” I call “basic human needs.” If you don’t want to be pregnant, you shouldn’t have to be. That’s basic bodily autonomy. I wonder if there is any way to prevent pregnancy. It all boils down to, "I should be able to go through life without doing anything to prevent things I don't want to happen from happening, and I should have a reset switch, for free, in any case those things happen." Now, it wouldn't be as bad as it is if that no…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:26 PM
7

It'll be hard for her to go to prison since she committed suicide. She will rot in hell, though.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:07 PM
6

How does that help the victims of those crimes? Hey guy that was just assaulted, I'll have you know it's not that bad because a dude beat you up. Should we only count bad stuff when the opposite sex does it? I'm sure lesbians will be overjoyed to hear that their abusers don't count since they were abused by someone of the same sex. I
/r/MensRights07/05/18 01:33 AM
4

Yeah, the point of that poster flew waay over your head if you think that MRAs think all rape accusers are just lying sluts. You also have a huge lack of empathy for the lives of men that have been destroyed due to a false accusation.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 01:06 AM
7

The men don't want a wife either. They want freedom to do whatever, and the traditional Japanese family is insanely anti-freedom for the male. Work 80 hour weeks, get a small allowance from the wife and maybe see your children, if she lets you? Fuck. That. I think a lot of aspects of family have to change in Japan for the birth rates to start rising.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:23 PM
18

Rape is sincerely hilarious
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:04 PM
7

So instead of incentivizing people to gain the merit needed to succeed, you incentivize people to claim victimhood based on gender or race. Obama's children will be more privileged than you or I ever will be, yet under affirmative action, they are considered disadvantaged. The child of a white meth head who is in and out of prison is considered privileged, even though he/she has never seen it. Plus, the issue isn't that 'disadvantaged' groups don't get a fair shake due to racism. They don't get …
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:46 PM
9

I mean, the huge swath of "not another rich white male" crap spewed is pretty clear both Sander and Trump were victims of misandry. And racism.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 08:00 PM
3

Aren't there a lot of women who would be labeled as incel? Is she ok with big tech companies firing swathes of unattractive people, especially if those people drive vans?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 06:04 PM
16

Dude, you can get banned from there by merely posting in "problematic" subreddits. Not even posting in r/feminism can get you banned from there.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:01 PM
2

Abuse would be a different matter. That, of course, should slant only the non-abuser to get the kids and the abuser to pay the child support. I'd be pissed, but with shared custody, I'd have a better shot at getting a job than if I was just saddled with the kids because the judge thought I should get the kids due to my genitalia. If my ex was the breadwinner and me staying home, instead of paying support to me and me not having any motivation to find a job, she could pay for daycare for me to dr…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:21 PM
3

Why not have default joint custody and neither side pays? Wouldn't insuring women get a guaranteed check from their ex encourage women to keep sole custody of their children and to avoid working? If women did not get a check, wouldn't that encourage them to find work and to keep a working relationship with their ex for childcare?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 06:36 PM
2

Sure. I just meant overall. It's like complaining as students, girls have to do homework. So? Everyone has to do homework. It's a non-statement.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:35 PM
2

The ones that didn't were incredibly shamed. People talk about the movie Titanic and Jack being able to fit on that piece of wood. I think he let go because he knew he was supposed to. If he didn't, he would have been labeled a coward. The Jack this is all supposition, I have 0 concrete evidence of that viewpoint.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:12 PM
3

Is this even a point when men were oppressed as well? Women were oppressed! So? Men were oppressed as well. The only thing to do is push for equal rights so it doesn't happen in the future.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:59 PM
4

Stella filibusters and then when Kate says something she doesn't like, she interrupts and filibusters some more. Nothing gets in the way of muh oppresshun.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:10 PM
1

It's easier to blame someone for your problems than take responsibility. Having a decent diet and exercising is way harder than stuffing McDonalds down the gullet. Having a solid and interesting personality takes practice, but being nasty is pretty easy. The whole thing is about what's easy. Then, when people find them repulsive, they think it's because of misogyny. No, people just don't like you.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:09 PM
1

That second link, the article is extremely disingenuous. The study said that conservatives didn't take race into account on saving the trolley full of people, while liberals did take race into account (Liberals were more likely to push Chip to save the trolley than Tyrone), but it did not say that conservatives were more likely to push Tyrone than Chip. Yes, you could infer that conservatives were more likely to push Tyrone than liberals were to push Tyrone, but that's not what the study is real…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:45 PM
1

I snagged a mug from somewhere that can legit hold 2L
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:55 AM
2

Yeah I wasn't saying he had a case in court for rape, I was saying that 1 beer most likely wouldn't knock him out without additional substances in that beer, ergo, not really drunk sex. All that is on the assumption the dude is a reliable narrator. I get what you are saying. The dude is in a very shitty situation and I feel for him.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:21 PM
0

If only those guys had access to firearms to protect themselves and their families.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 05:37 PM
4

Sure there's a lot of anger, but from what I've seen, that anger tends to be directed at specific women and not women on the whole. Whenever there is anger directed at all women, those posts or comments tend to get downvoted and called out. No way should all women be held accountable for the filth that is Clem Ford. Clem Ford should be held accountable for the filth that she is. I think most guys here want women to have equal opportunity and rights.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:56 PM
3

http://antifeminismaustralia.com/clementine-ford-man-bashing-quotes/
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:44 PM
3

She's gonna do it by encouraging men calling suicide helplines to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:33 PM
7

Queensland: https://www.dvconnect.org/mensline/ https://www.dvconnect.org/womensline/ The men's is kinda neutral, but it is very much slanted in the direction as men as abusers. The women's is 100% being abused. No mention of women who may have issues dealing with their own violence.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:08 PM
5

As it is is, we live in a world where it's women who are being murdered by men at a minimum rate of one a week in this country, not to mention the countless circumstances of sexual violence, physical harassment and ongoing domestic violence perpetrated against women.' Would it be ok if women were killed at a rate of 1 every 4 weeks? That's the rate that men die in DV in Australia, but I guess Clem doesn't care about that.... And there is no way at all a person that tweets, even jokingly, about k…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:48 PM
16

He had 1 beer and then woke up the next day. If he's telling the truth, there is no way 1 beer gets you that drunk...unless that 1 beer is in a 2 gallon drum or something.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:21 PM
10

It's a quip, sure, but the real reasons can be traced to Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:01 PM
4

Beneath that pile of shit as well, where a lot of those women never were. What was it? Like 80% of women throughout history have been able to pass on their genes compared to 20% of men or something? I'll have to check.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:51 PM
2

Genuine question. Are they really or is it a class issue? Public defenders are much worse than premium representation.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:43 AM
2

It's like the Staples button. Say wage gap and you get an explanation. You can't press that button with sarcasm.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:39 AM
1

She told me that she did not like him spending so much time with her Sometimes accusations of stuff like this is pure projection. Maybe look for signs to see if good ole sister is abusing her daughter?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:28 PM
3

Can we sticky this?
/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:19 PM
73

Either feminism is about equality between the sexes in which you must consider men's issues, or feminism is purely for women superiority. If someone bringing up men in a particular arena, and you shame that person, you aren't for equality. Judging by the plethora of examples showing feminists being very resistant to consider men's issues, I can safely conclude feminism isn't for equality. In other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:06 PM
7

If feminism was ever about equality, default shared parenting would have been the goal in the mid 1800s, and voting would have come with obligation to serve in the early 1900s.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:05 AM
3

Although there were enough female perpetrators to do statistics on this time, I left them out to keep it as similar to the in-work data as possible. So now, when people reference this data, there are no female perpetrators of sexual harassment, thus continuing the male-perpetrator-only narrative. I appreciate the diligence the author put in, but ignoring some parts of the data for arbitrary reasons seems disingenuous.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:32 PM
8

Will they though? Women still posture around other women. And it's not like they are banning gay women...so a few women will still peacock for sexual attention and other women will peacock to not be the ugly one.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:30 PM
1

We can empathize with women and question whether or not it happens "all the time". If you ask these women who say "all the time" they'll point to something that happened weeks, months or a year ago. Sorry, but having something happen rarely isn't all the time, regardless of how terrible that thing is. You shouldn't be cat called or sexually harassed. You shouldn't lie about how often it occurs, either. If it does happen frequently, thrn let's talk about who is doing it and what we can do to fix …
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:50 PM
2

I like it. We could use a bit of uplifting news every now and then.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:32 AM
19

It's sad really. These "non-hate subs" that ban any dissenting opinions have some of the most hateful ideas I've ever heard. Since all they hear is echo, these shitty ideas go unchallenged and are referenced left and right. Then they have the gall to label any group that criticises these ideas as hate groups. It's poison for logic, and it's every bit as hateful as they claim other groups are if not more.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:48 AM
3

I think most women who wear makeup, they do it to feel more attractive. Sure, some do it for themselves; there are exceptions to every rule, including this one.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:28 PM
14

2 minutes out of 10 hours. My favorite of how non issue this is is the male version of walking around and the dude getting cat called just like her. It's almost as if being attractive means people give you attention.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:05 PM
6

Of course it isn't a good idea, which is why it's foolish to dole out pussy passes like this to women who knowingly pervert justice.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:53 PM
64

Probably a nod to r/tumblrinaction which seems to have a similar outlook on dumb feminist crap as we do.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:49 PM
1

I'll check it out of I can. I'm no historian, I just figured having a place of residence independent on a herd of animals would be superior.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 08:11 PM
3

I obviously don't have a study on hand, but companies that hired whoever was the best, regardless of race, religion, sex, performed better than companies who only hired a specific type of people. Other companies saw that and said "golly gee, diversity is good, let's do that!". So they pushes diversity and not merit based programs.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:51 PM
27

a more diverse workplace leads to more success Might have effed up the quote, but the spirit is there. I wish they would stop parroting this as an excuse to discriminate. Diversity does lead to more success if you hire the best candidate, regardless of skin color, gender, religion, etc. People took that diversity line and came to the misguided conclusion that going for diversity for diversity sakes is what leads to a more productive workforce, and they are so wrong. They also come to the conclus…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:18 PM
18

Also as if women were more free and had it easier as hunter gatherers. Instead of a consistent home and a permanent shelter, women had to leave that and face possible predators or hostile tribes to gather. They had to pick up home and follow the migrating animals with the men. Farming wasn't without risk for sure, but it improved women's lives.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:59 PM
0

Braces and cleft pallets are false equivalencies. What makes you feel you aren't the biological sex that you are and what makes you think that surgery/hormones will help? Also, there's a lot of professionals on both sides of this argument, and there's a lot of evidence that people going through their transition aren't any better off that where they were to begin with.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:35 PM
2

Ignore them. You are 20, and they aren't really interested in you right now. In about 3-4 years, girls that are 20 now will give you looks. So don't sweat it. Work on you, work on your future. If you ignore women now and focus on your self, and use your peripherals, you'll see women checking you out. I was sorta in the same place as you. Around 22, in shape, seemingly dateable material, but I could seal any deals. I relaxed and just had fun. Kept school up, and in a year or two, I hooked up with…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:00 PM
1

Like the other guy said, women's violence is hidden in much lesser charges. Woman raping a man is sexual assault, not rape. So RAINN reports 1 in so and so many women and 1 in a very small number of men being raped. If made to penetrate is counted as rape, the rates roughly equalize between the sexes. Without applying our laws equally between the sexes, it's really tough to know exactly how often women commit crimes if you look at these statistics. I get where you are coming from, though, and it…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:33 PM
1

A lot of trans are changing up their physical appearance of anatomy and insisting they are something other than what they are. Wouldn't acceptance of a fact bring about a healthier life than giving into a delusion?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 10:50 AM
3

Not cutting it off....turning it into an arm and insisting it's a leg.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 10:55 PM
2

"We need a woman to be the first to step foot on mars!" - women who aren't gunning to be that woman
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:33 PM
2

What have you been saying? From your responses, I've seen you claim that other users have never have sex based on their analogies, and I've seen you misrepresent arguments.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:34 AM
3

Jeff: Sally, can we have sex? Sally: No! Jeff: Come on! I'm really horny and it's been awhile since we banged! Sally: Ok, fine. Jeff did not rape Sally. She fully consented to have sex with Jeff. Had she not wanted to have sex, she would have told him no again and to not ask again. Sally has agency and is capable of stating her feelings.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:27 AM
3

It isn't, that's true. The issue is the whole made to penetrate being left out of the discussion of rape. When you look at statistics and see 1 in so and so many women and not enough men to even mention are raped every year, you get people saying, "well this is a problem that is pretty much exclusively happens to women, therefore we need to spend X dollars on things to help specifically women." VAWA approached domestic violence and rape like this, and it provides funding for shelters and call ce…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:32 PM
2

Well I'll accept you, bro. Everyone deserves to be treated with decency.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:39 PM
21

Good god. She also drops a "I was raped and therefore super duper scared!" claim. Then she gets in trouble for assaulting another inmate. Something tells me she did all this shit more than willingly and is snatching at anything that makes her a victim. I hope she rots in prison and the child gets a better life than what this monster has provided.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:38 PM
2

Showing vulnerability doesn't mean that you can't also show strength or resiliency, though. No one is perfectly invulnerable. Part of bonding with others is being able to be vulnerable. We don't like characters that have no flaws, and we actively look down on Mary Sue's. I'm basically arguing that a woman doesn't have to be flawless to be strong, any more than a man has be flawless to be strong.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 02:40 PM
28

You can be vulnerable and soft. You can falter, fumble and learn. None of that is keeping you from also being strong and resilient. I don't know why people think that showing vulnerability is automatically weak.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 02:20 PM
15

http://archive.is/X4bOx Tim Wise, an anti-racist activist and writer who has spoken at more than 600 universities across the country since the mid-1990s said, “When you’ve had the luxury of presuming yourself to be the norm, the prototype of an American, any change in the demographic and cultural realities in your society will strike you as outsized attacks on your status.” Yes, that's it. Poor white guys are killing themselves, not because of their situation, but because they TV shows have more…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:38 AM
2

That and pay and prestige. As long as women swoon over guys doing typically guy things, they won't be swooning over guys doing typically girl things. Obviously, there are women out there that don't fit that mold, but most want a guy that banks more than them and has an interesting career. I think guys should feel free to do those jobs anyway, regardless of finding potential mates.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:10 PM
6

I think we know, women do not enter high paying fields. That's an overall wage gap argument. On average, even when women do enter into these high paying fields, they typically do not negotiate starting salaries, raises or promotions. They should, and studies show that when women negotiate, they get higher starting salaries, raises and promotions. That said, I can hear what my coworkers say around women, about women. Are these comments harming those women? Do the men treat those women terribly? I…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:40 PM
6

Ironically, this will only give rise to legit hate groups these women are so scared of. I don't condone and will condemn hate groups, but there's an obvious link to shaming people into a corner and those people clinging to anything that accepts them, even if that thing is a hate group. I would say "surely feminists understand this", but seeing how many times they double down on misandry, I don't think they do.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:45 PM
16

There's also the issue of negotiating and advocating for raises, both of which have a huge impact in wages. Women typically don't negotiate, when they do, they don't negotiate as hard, and they don't advocate for raises/promotions as much or as aggressively as men. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, discrimination does occur, however it is the least significant factor in how much a woman will get paid. The more people push sexism as the reason for the gap, the more they contribute to th…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:52 PM
1

Yes, and I think most of those businesses should fail by a market that doesn't discriminate.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:19 PM
1

So other people can see the flaws in his approach. I've accepted that you can't change the minds of some people you argue with, but I hope people on the fence that view the argue can be swayed.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:13 PM
3

Again, he should have the right to do this, and then when people find out, they should vote with their wallets on whether or not that barber shop should remain open. This shouldn't be a legal issue, and the only reason why it is, is because a woman lawyer decides to leverage her kid to make waves. Why didn't she go to a franchise style haircut place? Why did she go to a male only barber shop? Will she take her son to go to a woman only gym and sue them for discrimination? Or is she only doing th…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:27 PM
9

Yes, absolutely. I'm also for it if a black barber refuses to cut a white person's hair. Ironically, those two types of hair are different and probably require different skills. So thanks for helping me make my point. Now, I won't support people who discriminate purely for discrimination sakes, but they should have the right. Enough people voting with their wallet will insure people like that fail.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:58 PM
9

No, we are pro freedom, and forcing a guy to do something he neither has the skills for or desire to do is anti-freedom.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:48 PM
1

Gotcha, I see the difference.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:30 AM
2

I've seen this argument almost for verbatim. It's insane how much they'll jump through hoops to explain away a woman's free choice.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:29 AM
6

Feminists: Why are you being so hateful? Create your own space if you are so worried. Also feminists: Give us access to your spaces. What are you, a misogynist?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:24 AM
6

And then in Sweden, the burden of proof for consent is now on the accused, not the accusser. She says you didn't get explicit consent? Now YOU have to prove you received it. If you are in Sweden and you work with women, avoid them like the plague. Be polite, be cordial, record any interaction. Never be alone and never engage in any office romance.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:09 AM
2

There are quite a few that do, yes. Not all women giving up children are dirt poor. There's quite a few out there that aren't ready to be moms and don't believe in abortion. So they have the kid and give it up. How is this not a feasible idea?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:15 AM
5

But you see, the Patriarchy, peace be upon him, influenced your wife at an early age, and removed her ability to break glass ceilings and replaced that ability with internalized misogyny. Even though she thinks she made a choice, it was really the Patriarchy, peace be upon him, that made the choice. If you educated yourself, you'd realize that, shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:54 AM
31

They are bitching about how much they have to do to be presentable to men while missing they are doing all that work to be more presentable to men than other women.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:30 PM
3

A kid can't consent due to his/her age. A woman can consent to drinking and the responsibility of her actions while under the affects of those drinks. I see the point you are making, though.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:16 AM
5

What if she threatens a false accusation? I've seen stories on this sub about guys having to stay bases on that. Women have such a huge advantage there.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:08 PM
3

Physical wounds heal, but emotional wounds take years. I'm not saying that one is necessarily worse than the other, but don't dismiss psychological warfare that women are very much capable at waging. I've heard wives say things to their husbands that I'm sure the husband would rather have been stabbed than hear.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:03 PM
11

I was watching the Cassie Jaye stuff when she was doing interviews in Australia, and the "journalists" kept talking about 2 women a week dies to domestic violence in response to Cassie talking about DV....like it was a gotcha statistic that nulled all of Cassie's points. Except, they casually don't mention almost 1 guy a week dies to domestic violence as well. Only women dying to DV is worthy of attention, apparently.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:57 PM
6

Why report on this? Doesn't this give kids who are thinking about shooting up a school a celebrity-type incentive? How to stop school shootings: Stop reporting the name of the perpetrator. Only show the facts and then move on. Don't report anything that might show the perpetrator as being a celebrity. Why are news outlets like this not following these guidelines? Outside of that, anyone sending him should re-examine their life. This guy should rot away, with everyone forgetting his existence. Th…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:24 PM
2

Torn to 1 shred. So basically not torn at all, really.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 06:26 PM
7

I watched a video the other day, and this guy was talking about ideas and how worthwhile they are. Basically, if I got it right, he was saying that any idea, no matter how true or factual it is, is worthless if it is not challenged. If your idea has never been defended, it cannot be considered as worthwhile. If a sub with a set of ideas actively prevents those ideas from being challenged, that sub's ideas, and to an extent that sub, are worthless. If legislation is created based on those ideas, …
/r/MensRights28/03/18 06:24 PM
6

You have all these sweet words and sentiments about wanting to help men and their issues.... but if that were really the case, then why don’t you take all your criticisms over to feminists spaces and actually hold them accountable for the damage they have caused (and continue to cause) men.... Instead of trying to tone police us and stop us from criticizing the feminist movement, why don’t you go hold them accountable for their actions so we wouldn’t have any need to criticize them anymore! Not …
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:52 PM
6

To shred you say?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:46 PM
2

https://squawker.org/culture-wars/ucla-shock-study-women-have-raped-3-6-million-american-men/ Relevant exerpt: Stemple’s 2016 study found that a stunning 4.5 million American men have been forced to penetrate another individual at some point in their lives, which meets the legal criteria for rape. In 79.2% of these cases, the perpetrator was a woman. If feminists were really serious about tackling rape culture, we'd hear from them about this, but since they really aren't against rape culture, we…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:00 PM
3

whiny white women That's racist. If a guy wants to cry, he should be able to cry. Most guys don't want to cry, though. They'd rather do something with what they are feeling. They'd rather go to the gym and lift, using their frustration as extra energy. They'd rather go fishing and let the stress melt away. They'd rather throw back a few beers. Feminists have 0 business telling men how to cope with day to day stress, just as MRAs or anyone really, has any business telling women how to deal with d…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:45 PM
2

. she received so many death threats that she had to get help from the police. “There were literally thousands of abusive tweets — it was a semi-organized campaign,” she recalled in an interview. “ It ranged from the usual ‘cunt, bitch, dumb blonde’ to ‘I’m going to find out where you live and execute you.’” Funny enough, he received 30 times more threats and hate than she did. Most of the things she received were along the lines of "he slapped the crap out of her in this argument" and "she got …
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:16 PM
2

Because if a woman looks to get government support, the government will try to get most or all of that support from a father. Then it turns into how much she resents the man she's going after. If not at all, she may be fine with 50/50 custody. If a lot, she'll file a false sexual or domestic violence claim against him, and go for the gusto. Also like others have said, a lawyer who recommends this gets 0 money, so why would he/she recommend this? Guys would be leery of this, mainly due to the fac…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:59 PM
1

Rape is sincerely hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:52 PM
4

Ironically, people will claim that a woman or girl's first experience will affect their later sexual experiences.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:48 PM
2

If feminists admitted that 'toxic femininity' was a thing, they'd have to admit that women aren't inherently better than men or that women might not be the victims they claim they are. If women are responsible for their behavior, then feminists have to revoke the victim card. Right now there's a certain amount of power to be gained from being a perpetual victim, and no group has ever wanted to give up power voluntarily. The other reason is some of them are flat out misandrists. Feminists don't c…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:55 PM
2

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/apr/09/genevieve-wood/what-pay-gap-young-women-out-earn-men-cities-gop-p/ For single, childless women it's 8%, so your number for marriage and children might be accurate.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 10:22 PM
8

I mean....there IS a wage gap, but it's not due to discrimination, or discrimination is the least relevant cause. In fact the "gap" is in favor of women aged 22-30 in most of the large cities of America....by 8%, and unlike the "wage gap" against women, this 8% gap has solid evidence of discrimination. College help that's only available to women and jobs having blatant quotas for women are both directly affecting young men's ability to earn a living. Of course you don't see feminists attempting …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 10:54 PM
7

There is though. Women typically prefer people and men typically prefer things. Women are fully capable of doing math and science, but they are typically better and more interested in doing stuff related to people. If a woman wants to be an engineer, she should go be an engineer. If a man wants to be a nurse, he should go be a nurse. Just because men and women prefer different things on average, that doesn't mean men and women are doomed to follow those on average preferences. I have a daughter …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:03 PM
6

Yeah, he literally never said any of that.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:12 PM
14

Agreed. If a guy is going too drag himself through a shitshow of family courts, it's not because he's going to be a shitty dad. I'm no saying dad's who don't put forth that effort won't be good dads. There's probably tons of reasons why they don't, like tired of fighting and lack of capital.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:49 PM
1

https://archive.is/nFaYi#selection-2067.0-2067.115 How about an entire program for schools that teaches men they are the problem. And he's a lovely snippet at the end: “We will not stand by while one woman in Australia is killed every week through domestic violence,” Mr Merlino said. This completely ignores the fact that 1 man every other weeks dies through domestic violence. 20 fucking million dollars (Australian) spent on teaching menboys to be better, but not a dime spent on teaching girls to…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:13 PM
1

How many kids and how old? I really don't think taking care of kids all day would be that terrible. I have a 2 year old and taking care of her all day is fairly easy. Get her snacks, get her to do something that makes her busy, play a little bit, make sure she naps after lunch, etc. Have you guys looked into daycare? I know it's expensive, but that would free your wife up to go work herself. The pessimist in me says you need to start documenting how much you do for your kids and how much effort …
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:32 PM
2

I have a 2 year old daughter. I know she's not a boy, but a lot of kids around that age act pretty much gender neutral. I can tell you that having a kid has been one of the best things in my life. Even including tantrums and sleepless nights. Your kid will say "Dada" for the first time while gazing into you eyes, and it will absolutely melt your heart. Your kid will laugh for the first time, and it will be the finest sound you have ever heard. Your kid will stand for the first time, and you'll b…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 01:21 PM
2

I've been in roughly the same boat. My wife has pulled the "we aren't having this discussion now" card right after saying something incendiary. At the beginning of the relationship, I caved. Now, I ignore that card. If she wants to say something shitty to me, I'm not going to let it slide. Consequently, she doesn't say hardly any shitty things to me. IMO, if she pulls the 'I'm tired' card, you have a couple options. You can ignore the card, and say, 'nope, we are finishing this conversation now.…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:12 PM
1

I think almost everyone wants to be the highest on the ladder in any given situation. A couple ways to 'be higher' on that ladder than let's say, your partner, you can either climb higher than your partner, or you can pull your partner down. Building yourself up takes effort. Tearing someone down merely takes a few choice words based on that person's insecurities. If you are married to someone, you end up with a lot of material if you want to hurt them. Now, guys learned in school, that if you d…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:04 PM
1

If she brings claims that you are abusive, do not sign or agree to anything that accepts this. I saw this vid today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTOwnwHgnUs&t=5s Even though it's regarding Canadian law, they do reference US law quite a bit, and they have a few lawyers who give good advise on what to do and not to do regarding family courts. They also talked about how mediation rarely works. Reasonable adults don't need it and unreasonable adults don't benefit from it.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 05:11 PM
6

Didn't the experts find the abuse was 30:1 towards Peterson and not toward Newman? The whole "I faced abuse online!!11" was her just calling for victimhood in light of getting thrashed in that interview. Most of the tweets she saw were critiquing her. That's not abuse. Most of the tweets toward Jordan were vile and hateful. I can't take this woman seriously when she can't face honest criticism and claims she was abused.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:57 PM
1

Did the teacher bother to ask any of the women if they received enthusiastic consent every time they had sex?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:49 PM
2

I wonder if the disparity is due to the type of work the family did to get rich in the first place. A CEO of a corporation can build a network of people that could mentor and then hire his children. An athlete can't bestow athletic greatness on his kids. I'm not dismissing racism; surely there's an amount to this. I just wonder if there is something else that's deeper that's causing this problem.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:36 PM
3

I posted a link to an askfem thread yesterday where the mods there literally believe this is a hate sub. I'm 100% positive there's a few feminists that swing by every day and downvote just about everything.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:22 PM
2

I find the "check your privilege" statement to be a thing racists and sexists say to people who call out their racism and sexism. I hate the statement and it reeks of over generalization.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:10 PM
-1

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/85iq2s/this_4chan_copypasta_sits_on_the_frontpage_of_rmr/ Basically, "check your privilege" isn't shaming, it's telling you to re-evaluate your views based on your skin-tone/genitalia, and if I find your views to differ from mine, your skin-tone/genitalia automatically means you are wrong. Oh, and /r/Mensrights is a hatesub - askfem Mod.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:03 PM
3

Someone even replied to her saying that they couldn’t bear to read any more of the women’s stories, while they found most of the men’s stories to be quite entertaining and funny. I think, and I have no direct evidence of this, but I think that men handle a lot of their situations with gallows humor that down plays the situation immensely. A situation that would have some women crying on face book or alerting the authorities is something guys laugh off, and I think they have to laugh it off. I me…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:29 PM
42

in the end, the prosecution’s decision to introduce results of the sexual-assault exam backfired when the defense attorney elicited from the prosecution’s expert witness that the accuser’s anal swab revealed another male’s DNA. She bangs Khan, then later that day, bangs another dude, anal no less. Perhaps, word of her misdeeds came out, and sentencing a man to life as a rapist is better than admit she get really, really horny when she drinks.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:43 PM
1

I read this is Mr Torgue's voice from BL2.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:49 PM
1

supporting local toy stores. Or secondhand stores that sell those stupidly expensive toys for like 20% of the original price. I make good money, but I'm not above getting my toddler secondhand crap. She doesn't know the difference and the shit's dirty 12 seconds after she puts it on or plays with it anyway. I swear, it's like she has a pile of dirt that just follows her everywhere...
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:15 AM
7

Feminism looooves to reinvent history. "All women were oppressed through history!" is a favorite. What they don't tell you is that most of the men that have existed throughout history have been standing right beside that poor oppressed woman. Up until that last couple hundred years, indentured servitude was a thing, and that meant the man of the house was every bit someone else's property as the woman was. Men who were in power had wives that held much more privilege than 99% of the men beneath …
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:03 AM
2

The pills my wife takes are insanely effective at preventing pregnancy, a la zero sex drive. I absolutely love not having sex!
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:18 AM
10

Pretty much. If you tell people they'll do worse or be victims or that men are oppressors, they'll perform worse, claim victimhood and be fearful of men. Tell me again how feminism actually helps women?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:13 PM
5

This is from last year, and we already knew this. Google, iirc, just paid whatever fine to hand wave away the discrimination. From what I can tell, I understand why they pay women and men different. The women sit around on the google boards bitching about social justice while men do the work. This is an overly broad generalization, since I know there are women that do work and men who bitch along side those SJWs. The James Damore fiasco sorta highlights this generalization. Still, you'd think th…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:09 PM
8

Didn't we get brigaded a few days ago from feminists regarding something or other? Every time I see a mensrights post on r/all, I figure we'll get swamped by feminists. Sometimes I'm right and sometimes I'm wrong, which I'm glad. If anyone classifying mensrights as a hate sub, they should apply those same guidelines to every sub, and if they did, they'd find a lot more hate subs than just ones that aren't 100% feminist.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:33 PM
4

In their report to the council, the campaigners said: “We do not believe in the objectification of women. These women are artists and athletes, much the same as a Victoria’s Secret model but vulnerable without high-profile agents and some struggling to pay their mortgage. The Windmill Club needs to be shut down as a matter of urgency to stop the gropes, pinching and slaps and to stop those managers who are pressuring dancers into lewd acts.” Pick one. You can't close a club and force women out o…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 05:24 PM
1

Do dads get a rough time in Family Court? Absolutely not! All you have to do is prove that you have time, you don't abuse the kids or the mother, that you have the money, that you spend substantial time with the kids, and if you hire an attorney that will fight like hell for you! Whereas she has to have a vagina and be alive. Tell me again about how "dad's having a rough time" is a thing of the past? Do mothers have to prove all this shit, too? I mean, if a mom can show up to court and have the …
/r/MensRights13/03/18 06:23 PM
9

Why are we comparing her to Brock Turner? I mean, a mini version of Larry Nassar maybe....
/r/MensRights13/03/18 04:45 PM
2

Which is probably why there's such a problem with feminism. Even if they try to look at issues from a different point of view, they slap their oppressor goggles on, and they make sweeping judgement as if they were men. If they were men and looked down on women, they would interrupt women all the time. If they were men and saw a good looking woman, they would say crude things to her and dismiss her as a person.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:13 PM
0

No, you make the claim, you provide the proof. If I make those claims it's on me, but you may have to accept your sources are cherry picking or quote mining. Don't whine like a little bitch when you make a bold claim and the utterly fail to bavk that claim up. Your use of insults just drives the point home that you are just an immature person lashing out to be edgy. Post proof or shut up. Or don't shut up and continue looking like a moron. I don't care.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:03 PM
0

Ah, you are just spouting idiotic nonsense. Gotcha. Lemme know when you actually have evidence of him being an idiot. If it's so commonly known, it would be easy to provide this evidence....
/r/MensRights12/03/18 08:42 PM
6

Those listings are unfounded and pure bigotry. It's not that mra's are the problem, it's that those doing the listing are not holding themselfs to the same standards they impose on others. This. If those listing applied those standards equally, then most movements, even the ones that support the listings, would be labeled as hate groups. I used to frequent MGTOW quite a bit, but I moved over to here. I've seen as vile shit on /r/feminism and r/askfeminists as /r/mgtow. I mean, when Twitter femin…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:51 PM
0

How is it valid criticism? How is he an idiot in "every other subject he speaks on"? Gonna need some proof of that claim. And this: It's like a Nazi agreeing with you that the trains should run on time: Not an ally you want. is an absurd metaphor. Even at Peterson's very worse, he treats others with dignity and I don't see him bringing anyone down. If he attacks anyone, he attacks ideas, not people. Perhaps you could learn from him about not insulting people who you disagree with.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:38 PM
2

There's no medical benefits for circumcision. Modern medicine says "keep your stuff clean and you'll be fine". So either you side with modern medicine or you side with your religion. ThereThey are on different sides. Also typically it is only Islamic cultures and pagan cultures in sub-Sahran Africa that practice FGM, and they are not exactly cultures that have a good track record with human rights. Right. So they do it and it's bad, but you can do it because it's good. Every culture has been shi…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:08 PM
1

I am just saying that people should be allowed the choice to get circumcised or to circumcise their sons. Most of the religious reasons for doing things come from a time that didn't have the medical and scientific advancement we have in this day and age. The reasons for circumcision that were acceptable back then just don't apply today. The only reasons for circumcision today are religious or aesthetic. If you son wants a circumcision, it should be his choice when he is old enough to make that c…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 07:05 PM
2

Not true. There are FGM procedures that leave the sensitive areas intact. Be consistent here. Either you are on board with cutting up genitalia or you aren't.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:12 PM
2

How do you know? Did you bang anyone before you were cut to make a solid comparison?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:11 PM
2

Wait, wait, you were offering science as a reason for circumcision. Now, you are offering religion? If your kid wants a circumcision for 'religious' purposes, he can do it when he's adult, assuming you haven't stoned him to death for violating one of the laws in your book that says you should chop part of your son's dick off. Does your religion say you have to do it when he's a newborn? Does your religion say he won't be admitted into heaven as long as his penis hasn't been altered at birth? Ser…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:10 PM
2

So if I remove "I treat everyone with dignity" and just leave it as "I treat single moms with dignity", my sexist tone won't be obvious? Are you stupid? unpaid labour bullshit Yeah, yeah you are stupid. Why would someone pay you to have kids and care for them? That's just being a parent. Same with chores around the house. You don't bring any value to anyone, so why would you get paid? That's such a stupid notion. No one pays me to clean my house and I don't expect anyone to. single parents force…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:19 PM
1

Looking down at your phone while driving is also an honest mistake, but that doesn't absolve you from the consequences should something happen while your eyes aren't on the road. Just like you aren't immune to consequences should you have unprotected sex. I'm not saying kids are a punishment, though. Kids are awesome, but they are a time and money sink. If you don't have the time and money to invest in a kid, you should be really careful with who you sleep with and making sure you are safe from …
/r/MensRights10/03/18 05:04 PM
1

Lol I'm not talking about divorced parents. Typically divorced parents have support from their ex partner. You can't claim oppression on getting support from your ex. You can't claim oppression when you have kids without a solid partner. So you are right, we are done here. Claiming oppression from a conscious decision is stupid.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:44 PM
1

At what point should we stop when it comes to toxic masculinity? At the name that infers masculinity is toxic? At the definition that assumes a set of behaviors are toxic and are then applied to men? At the notion that men, and seemingly only men, police what is and isn't masculinity? As if women hold no hand in defining what masculinity is..... It's sexist no matter what way you spin it, and it's a shitty word. I'm not going to blame all feminity for women slut shaming each other or women being…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:19 PM
8

That doesn't change the fact that had any of those single parents had a partner, they would have created a better environment to raise kids. A stable family doesn't necessarily include a man, or a woman for that matter, but a stable family is much easier obtain with two parents over one. People who are looking to have kids should be striving for having kids with a partner as the most ideal situation. They should really avoid having kids without a partner, as they are setting themselves and their…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:08 PM
7

It's not a systemic issue, it's a choice. If you are single and choose to have kids, you can't claim a disadvantage. This is like saying people who quit jobs voluntarily are systemically disadvantaged. Sure, single moms should be treated with dignity, but then again, everyone should be treated with dignity. The fact is that a double parent household is typically a superior environment to raise kids than a single parent household. Don't blame society on women's choice to have kids out of wedlock.…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:59 PM
15

I'm not a feminist and I'm downvoting you. I'm all for a day for women, regardless of what feminists do on this day or the international men's day or any other day.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:01 PM
4

Don't watch the video for it then....it's worse and better.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:23 AM
1

Diet changes as well, maybe? Since the whole fat=bad movement came about, people have been eating a crap ton more carbs than before. Could there be a correlation or negative correlation between carb/sugar intake and sperm count?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:15 PM
1

I love listening to Milton. He puts these points together in an easily understandable and eloquent fashion. If you enjoy him, you'll also enjoy Thomas Sowell and Yaron Brooks, but offer the same points.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:27 PM
18

'He believed she was consenting': Defence Is this the author's way of saying this defence tactic is bullshit or something? Of course a guy who thought he had consensual sex with a woman is going to believe she consented.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:59 PM
1

Of course there's no record when the website won't let you register if you are a boy.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:49 PM
1

*He A dude wrote this.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:50 PM
2

Hitting someone that posed no threat to you is assault. Hitting someone for assaulting you is self defense. If you are talking to someone, and they up and pull out a taser and taze you? That seems like a perfect reason to invoke self defense.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 12:38 AM
35

Moral of the story: Biology is a major cause of broken homes. No, cheating mothers are a source of broken homes. Biology brings that cheating behavior to light.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:03 PM
1

Those tips are absurd if it's only targeted to men talking to women. Are women so fragile they can't use their expertise to stand up for themselves against a man being a dick? Where's the poster telling women to extend this courtesy to men to avoid hurting their feelings? Sure, guys shouldn't be condescending...but then again, everyone shouldn't be condescending. This poster could have provided these tips on consideration without taking a shot at men.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:54 AM
1

No prob. The inability of these folks pushing this word to see the double standard is sad. These are self described academics using sexist slang to shit people up they don't agree with.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:17 AM
1

Hell yeah, they should be ticked off if MRAs casually coined the term and then got it pushed as a main stream word and into a dictionary. I mean, the sad thing is that there's already a gendered term for condescending. "Patronizing"already exists.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:08 AM
1

Except that a lot of times, you don't know the person may know more than you about a subject and even if they do, that's no guarantee they are right about everything about that subject. I have spent more time and I know more about the rules of dnd 3.5 than the guys in dm'ing, but one of them proved me wronf about a particular rule. Should I have told him to stop pc'splaining to me? I mean....to interupt discourse because someone is questioning your knowledge of or making a claim to you when you …
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:05 AM
7

Oh ok. Since the examples are of different types of words, his point is completely irrelevant. Gotcha. You didn't absolve the blatant sexism in the word of mansplaining at all and your excuse to why it's acceptable is incredibly weak.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:47 AM
1

She's not really a pedophile, though. She's a statutory rapist to be sure, but she didn't go for anyone prepubescent.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:45 PM
1

Maybe, or maybe she's just surrounded by youthful bodies all day every day. I mean, she went through high school (lots of youth), went through college (lots of youth) and went back to high school (lots of youth). It wouldn't surprise me if she didn't snag a guy her own age if she never really spent much time around guys her own age. She probably spent a good chunk of college on her back (this is all hyperbole and I have no evidence...but with how attractive she looks, she definitely was swimming…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:43 PM
7

So let me get the second lady straight. She turned down a significant pay raise and quit her nice, 135k/year job, to address the concerns of unequal pay between men and women? How does this help? So now instead of getting paid 180k/year, she's being paid 0. So now instead of being one of the women getting paid 180k/year at BBC, thus resolving the gender pay gap she's so upset about, she quits....? That doesn't seem to add up. I mean, you can be pissed that if they think you are worth 180k but th…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:45 PM
1

Yeah, I'd say so. I wonder how many they'll need to do.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:47 PM
1

Well I'm talking Marine Corps, not army. As far as I know, the Marines haven't changed. The army used to do a 2 mile run. I'm guessing the endurance was cut to focus on speed and overall strength over endurance and upper body strength (pushups).
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:47 AM
1

So to get max points in the run, men had to run the 3 miles in 18 minutes. You got deducted 6 or 10 points per minute after 18. Women maxed at 20 or 21 minutes. Men failed the run if they took longer than 27 minutes, women 30. Men had to do pullups, 3 being the minimum. You got 5 points per pullup maxing out at 100 points or 20 pullups. Women had to do the flexed arm hang for some amount of time, I don't remember. Both sexes could easily do the max 100 crunches. If women had to do pullups, that …
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:20 AM
3

I don't think it would. The deadlift testing raw strength is good, the sprint/carry/drag is good and replicates dragging a fallen soldier and carrying ammo, the throwing test and leg lift are generally good for a number of situations. I feel they need an endurance test, though. Sprints are fine, but if you're dead after 1...thats not good.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:29 AM
3

The test tests strength, speed, throwing and core. Depending on what all is required to pass, I'd say it's a good test. In the Marines 2000-2004, it was 3 mile run, pullups and crunches.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:22 AM
1

I don't see women overwhelmingly stopping those men from shelling civilians, raping, torturing and committing genocide. Overwhelmingly, it's men who stop those other men. Those other men are the very minority of all men. Also, I don't see men committing infanticide, statutory rape, online bullying and slutshaming at the rate I see women do. I don't hate women, I just hate what women do.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:21 PM
6

Can you share the story? I don't see too many feminists these days shake that mantle. Most of them dig their heels in and double down.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:13 PM
43

So my wife just got some decently upsetting news last night about the future of her job. Basically, it's not going in the direction she thought it was. She was rightly upset about this. She moped around for a bit, and only gave 1 word answers all night. At the end of the night, after the kid was in bed and we were settling down for the night, she said, "Ok, I moped around and felt sorry for myself. Tomorrow, I'm either going to be pissed and use that energy to get what I want, or I'm going to be…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:33 PM
1

It's relevant to your pro-socialist ideals there, Bernie Sanders. The scenario I painted regarding healthcare and how long it takes to get that healthcare is exactly what's happening in Canada and in other socialized healthcare countries. The vast majority of development in healthcare is done here in the US, not in socialized healthcare countries. In Canada, if you want to be seen in a timely manner, you have to (surprise!) go to a cash for care doctor that isn't part of the socialized system. A…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:51 PM
3

There's also the differences in help. A girl from a broken home where her mother and father die or abandon her may get more help and empathy than a boy going through the same stuff. Every school shooting I've read about, the perpetrators have shown clear signs of going through something or having mental problems. Either I am saying that girls with mental problems won't commit violence (not as much as boys, sure, but they are more than capable of violence) or girls with mental problems tend to ge…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:20 PM
2

K, bye.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:08 PM
1

The socialized schooling where teachers are horrendously underpaid and we are hemorrhaging teachers annually and we are behind just about every other western country in most subjects? Then you want to expand that to higher education and healthcare? Socialized healthcare means if you want a family doctor, you need to wait years to get one and if you need healthcare, you get to wait pretty much an entire day just to see a doctor, who might refer you somewhere else. Socialized healthcare means the …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:48 PM
4

I got banned for saying that not all women are oppressed and not all men are oppressors. I created a new account and got banned again, because I dared mention that you'd get banned for questioning the tenants of that sub, IE, men=bad women=good. The sub isn't a place for healthy debate and critique of feminism. It is a place to slam anything critiquing of feminism, and if you didn't get banned, you are an outlier, not a representative of what normally goes on there.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:39 PM
24

Interestingly enough, the whole "Diversity is better" idea came from companies that hired the best people, regardless of color/sex/whatever performed better than companies that only hired straight, white males. So now, companies push "diversity" over hiring the best people, and companies that push diversity over everything else, tend to perform worse than companies that don't. Diversity is ok if it leads to the best people being employed. Pushing diversity for diversity sake is a poor way to run…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 06:54 PM
8

I'm 6'3" 220, which makes me larger and stronger than the vast majority of women. Does that mean any woman I have sex with is rape due to her inability to consent from the power dynamic? After all, is there an implied threat I would be violent to them if they said no? How far down does this bullshit rabbit hole go?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:09 PM
1

There's been at least one study in 2011 that analyzed suicides for trans, and found the rates for suicide to be much higher than any other population. You're talking about a study that didnt distinguish between kids that are gender variant (tomboys and tomgirls) and kids with actual dysphoria. The article I read specifically said kids with gender dysphoria tend to grow out of it. Now if you have a better study, I'll gladly read it. It doesn't change the fact that there's still a lot of developme…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:59 PM
1

The suicide rate is the same post and pre op, why would it go higher? Besides, wouldn't most people realize they are the sex they are when the finally reach full maturity instead of fooling with hormones? Most kids who have gender dysphoria grow out of it, and it's very tough to determine who will and who won't grow out of it. Erring on the side of what happens to most kids, not going through hormone treatment seems to be the better deal for most kids. Most kids before 25, regardless of how adam…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:14 PM
1

Experts widely agree that human development continues till right around 25. What kind of expert allows a kid that isn't fully developed to transition his/her sex? What kind of parent goes along with this? After 25, you wanna swap your bits around or you feel like you need to swap your bits around, go for it. Before 25? If argue you are just questioning who you are as a person, which is completely normal.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:01 PM
6

Why is a high schooler going through a sex change? How does this girl figure she's a boy and not just a girl interested in boy stuff? Imo, allowing your kid to go through this is child abuse. She still has 7 more years of development; she's has no clue what she wants at 18.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:47 AM
9

Effort gap
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:30 PM
1

I did a quick google and pulled up two quick cases. One was just a factual "this happened", and the other just said that neighbors didn't see this coming. Neither one built up the killer to be bubbly and nice and warm. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/18/alabama-man-kills-kids-daughters-fiancee-then-self-police-say.html https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2018/02/15/police-man-kills-wife-daughter-then-fatally-shoots-self-michigans-thumb/341794002/
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:20 PM
2

Yup, that sub and by extension, feminism and twox are cancerous echo chambers. Typically a ban by one will be followed up with a ban by the other two. They ban objective discourse under the disguise of hate speech or misogyny, which neither is true for the most part or even provable. They don't want their ideals challenged, because they know their power relies heavily upon being right about their victimhood. Should that victimhood be revoked, they'll be held accountable for the crap they spew. T…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:31 PM
4

Top (wo)men are looking into this.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:20 PM
4

The infantilizing of women is fantastic in that last comment. Kutcher is a man, therefore has more power than an older and more successful woman! But if a guy says this, that's misogyny? It's good this comment gets downvoted, but still, why would you auto think this? Studies show that when you tell people they are worse than other people, they perform worse on tests and have lower self esteem. Does she think she's helping women by telling them men are better? I really don't get this attitude.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:18 PM
1

I got my wife a gun and we spent the day shooting. Was overall a fun day. You shouldn't be obligated to do anything for your girl, but you should be ok with voluntarily doing something nice.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:14 PM
4

"A woman was groped by a guy 2 years ago, so we need all men to leave the pool for only an hour!!" What? How about you hold that one guy accountable and get on with your life. "Religions are oppressing women and they need an hour to swim!" So instead of holding this mysterious religion accountable for oppressing women, you encourage that religion by catering to their segregation?
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:21 PM
7

Dude, like what? Women's bathing suits are basically underwear and either a tank top or bra. If women are wearing clothing that are just as showy, chances are that clothing IS a bathing suit. Because swim boy shorts and swim shirts aren't a thing. Because 1 piece swimsuits the cover up the entire torso of a woman aren't a thing. If a woman throws on a string bikini, she did that shit on purpose, not because she was forced to. Just like if a dude put on a speedo, it wasn't an accident.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:26 PM
4

From the USAToday link, Lawrance Bohm represents Lena Zawaideh, a former drummer for White’s rock band. Among other allegations, she had claimed White had sent her lewd text messages and forced her to watch sexually disturbing videos, including videos sexualizing human fecal matter. Basically, he had her watch 2 girls 1 cup as a joke, most likely, and she got her panties in a wad about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 05:00 PM
5

Because women overwhelming don't view men as capable of saying no to any form of sexual harassment. OP might have to go back to HR and say that he wants to formally make a complaint. He should record and document like /u/Meyright said, and make it clear that he was harassed. If they fail to do anything or laugh at him again or tell him he's not a victim or whatever, he should say that he will talk to a lawyer about this. Then he should go talk to a lawyer regarding discrimination. It really suck…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:54 PM
11

Vaughn’s behavior during the hearing was concerning, the appeals court states -- she was one of a three-member panel charged with deciding whether John Doe would be punished and allegedly “dominated” the proceedings. She also told John, “I’ll bet you do this [sexually assault women] all the time,” he alleges. Because of Vaughn’s alleged biases, John’s due process rights may have been violated, court documents state. ............. Another awkward encounter with a girl while drunk turns into sexua…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:05 PM
1

One day....may the force be with you, T-65.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:29 PM
27

Carly Thomsen a Professor of ‘Gender, Sexuality and Feminist Studies’ at Middlebury College in Vermont was shocked that one of her courses was described as “categorically insane.” The course’s title? “Queering Food.” In what fucking way is "Queering Food." a meaningful subject of knowledge that benefits mankind? I mean, it might be worth an article, but a full college course that grants college credit that helps toward a degree? Hell no.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:31 PM
7

They've admitted this. In askfeminist posts about whether or not they are for helping men, most directly answer that feminism is about helping women and they have no responsibility to help men. They'll point you to a side bar post about what feminism is doing to help men, but most of that is indirect help at the very best and outright lies normally.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:47 PM
1

All and all, it is ridiculous, but these are the societal rules. She gets leeway for her vagina, and you get an uphill climb because of your penis. That's the way it is, and the laws need to change. Until they do, you be the better person for your kid. It sucks you have to deal with the increased stress, but from the court's perspective, you are cooperating and working to make the best of the situation. If it comes down to her trying to take your kid away, you have a history of good behavior and…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:25 PM
2

She wants the phone calls? That's fine. Record them. Document them. That way you are cooperating AND you can have evidence she is being a piece of crap to you and trying to alienate your kid.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:33 PM
1

Gotcha. I feel even with her bias, the thesis was a nugget of gold in understanding why MRAs get blasted. It's like, she did this whole research project and then failed to see herself in the results.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:05 PM
13

This is how it goes: I’m huffing and puffing my way up a steep incline. We’re gaining almost 3,000 feet of elevation in just 4 miles, the next water source is (probably, hopefully) one mile away, and my pack weighs 30 pounds, heavy with food I’ve packed out of town. I’ve hiked a couple of miles so far and plan to hike ten more before I set up camp to go to sleep. Other hikers keep passing me; some have smaller packs, some have larger packs. I stop to take a sip from my water bottle and a tall ma…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:03 PM
7

He's not wrong though (assuming he.../u/kdulius could be an Apache Attack Helicopter), 454 miles is quite a distance for an out of shape person who mentions how gay she is in about every single paragraph and how much sexism she thought she experienced at every step. She is below an average Joe and Jane, and still almost hit 500 miles. Not bad, really. If she were a well-adjusted individual, she would figure out what she failed at, got better gear, got in better shape, and tried again. That's why…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:53 PM
3

That's the view that women, on average, hold, though. If you are against gender-based benefits, women view that as hostile sexism. The only acceptable "equality" movement is benevolent sexism towards women, in the eyes of the average woman. Of course, being opposed to gender-based benefits is a lack of sexism. Of course equal opportunity is what is morally right, but what this thesis has found was that there are a lot of people out there that think equal opportunity in it's raw form is akin to h…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:30 PM
1

I can't think of anything that would take 4 men to do that would only take 2 women. There are exceptional women out there that can do the work of many men, but average to average, there's not much out there that would take multiple men to fewer women.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:48 PM
2

Some members of the all-male hiring committee for investment pros allegedly said they won't hire women because their “wives won’t let them.” There are almost no senior women at the company. Chief operating officer Tim Shaughnessy allegedly frequently holds meetings labeled as "no girls allowed." The lawsuit also accused Mark Herr, the firm’s head of corporate communications, of making degrading comments about women. Those are the only claims that seem demeaning. The rest don't say anything about…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:43 PM
9

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf Advocating for equal rights between the sexism has been proved to be viewed as hostile sexism. Feminists have also admitted time and again it's not up to feminism to work on men's issues; they don't really care. If by happenstance a policy that helps women also kinda helps men, then they use that as a beacon of how progressive and helpful they are towards men, when in reality, it was an accident at best.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:10 PM
1

https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx?View={faf6eddb-5a68-4f8f-8a52-2c61f5bf9ea7}&SortField=P_x002f_FA&SortDir=Desc Not just women, obviously, but there are tons of cases with people being sent to prison for false accusation/perjury. This website has the people that were freed from prison, and obviously doesn't include the people still rotting in prison.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:31 PM
1

Agreed, although one could also make the argument to instead try to spur investment in such an infrastructure to help the local economy. Very true. I'm more for that than merely donating goods, but I do feel a sense of empathy for people living in places without all the shit I have and take for granted.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:16 PM
2

Well, the older you are, the more likely you'll recognize bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:10 PM
2

The issue with providing them is that there's a crap ton of different feminine products out there for the crap ton of different PMS symptoms women experience. If you provide free heavy pads, well, that won't sit well with women who prefer tampons or lighter pads. Extrapolate that out to all the different types of women and their sensitivity to various materials. It would be better if there were a non-regulated market out their for tampons/pads, so that they could be bought at a cheap price and w…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:04 PM
46

Once you provide examples, you'll most likely get pushback in the form of: Well, historically, men had it better, so these things are in place to correct for that. Men make the laws, so it's their fault this happens. It's not even that bad. When was the last time we had a draft anyway? Why should feminists do anything about this anyway? Feminist is for women's rights, so start your own movement if it's that important. You just hate women. Your responses could follow along the line of: So what? M…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:19 PM
2

The subject of whether or not it's moral to force a man to pay for a woman's decision? I mean, asking whether or not he deserves to suffer is the entire point of this post.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:59 PM
2

Does the man deserve to suffer? Courts are notoriously tough on guys who pay child support, from refusing to lower the payments if his job changes to throwing him in jail, regardless of his financial situation.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:35 PM
-1

Take bc geez Make him wear a condom geez Get an iud geez Use a diaphragm geez
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:25 PM
-1

Take bc geez Make him wear a condom geez Get an iud geez Use a diaphragm geez
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:25 PM
2

Take bc geez Make him wear a condom geez Get an iud geez Use a diaphragm geez
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:23 PM
3

Those professional women are like most professional men, too busy working to give a fuck about this nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:12 PM
25

Maybe instead of a wage or earnings gap, how about calling it an effort gap?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 06:02 PM
2

Definitely there is a huge bias, and I'm not saying their isn't at all. I'm just saying that when women do get hit with alimony or child support, they are virtually immune to enforcement of the court orders. And they do like it that way. Equality looks like oppression to the privileged.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:03 PM
4

Women aged 22-30 make more than men in the same age range: http://fortune.com/2016/04/12/women-are-out-earning-men/ Women who never leave work to pursue motherhood make around 8% more than men: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/10/01/the-gender-pay-gap-is-the-result-of-being-a-parent-not-discrimination/#af0aaaeac7fd The "pay gap" is overwhelmingly due to a woman's desire to become a mother, and has very, very, very little to do with discrimination. Feminism telling women they will be…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:48 PM
-10

The right lose access to their children in divorce. The right to pay their ex's more when they get to see their kids less. This isn't specifically something that men face, since women do face it as well. With more women making more than men, they'll see it more. The disparity shines through on the enforcement of alimony and child support. Women doesn't pay? No one cares. Man doesn't pay? Let's increase the support and throw him in prison. That's the real right. Immunity to enforcement of court o…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:28 PM
1

You are also a woman on a men's rights forum, which doesn't really represent a significant portion of women. Most women out there, I'd guess, would be completely blind sided by having to pay alimony or child support. There are articles from the UK that I've read where the new trend now is successful women complaining about spousal support and how terrible this is and how archaic the laws! Well, men have been putting up with this for a long time and only recently, now that women are doing much be…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:26 PM
3

He's not lying. I know it sounds vague, but in reality, every single day, you wake up and do what it takes to stay together. You hang your pride up in the closet, and you do what you can to stay in it. There's no real magic formula other than that. Now, if your partner is abusive, you can do what you can to change that, but if they don't want to change, you should leave. Most marriages, though, fall apart because one or both partners say "fuck it" and quit. You want your marriage to work? Don't …
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:28 AM
1

Thomson has declined to make a comment to CBC Toronto about her allegation, saying, "I am not looking to be paraded through the press as I was last time, nor am I looking to shame Steve." What are you looking to do? You want to fuck over a guy anonymously with no one doing any investigation?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:16 PM
2

It's the same with everything that's an issue with women. Women as a whole earn less than men? Gotta be that discrimination. Man talks over a woman? Gotta be sexism. Woman tells other women to put their big girl panties on? Internal misogyny. It's not that women have different priorities in life and don't have a societal pressure to be a breadwinner to win a mate. It's not that guy talking over everyone and not just women. It's not that some women really do need to put on their big girl panties.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:43 PM
3

Because if they advocated for them to change, they would have to admit their shortcomings. If they believe they are infallible, then they are already perfect and don't have to change; the world should change to be as perfect as them. The idea that it's not a woman's fault that she didn't have the life she wants is an attractive idea. It's the same attractive idea that other groups have that tell their members it's not their fault, it's "x" group's fault. If men were to just be more like women, t…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:58 PM
3

The only irony here is your insistence on Trump voters all being stupid is incredibly stupid. Maybe they didn't want to vote for Trump but didn't want to vote for Hillary more. Maybe they liked some policies, not all, and felt Trump waa the lesser of two evils. There are a ton of sane and not stupid reasons to vote for him and millions of very smart people voted for him. You can't derive someone's intellect by who they vote for. Also, I don't think you know how statistics worn and how intelligen…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 12:52 AM
2

We have effectively a two party system, so any reason to not vote for one candidate or feel strongly enough to not want a particular candidate in the white house is effectively a a reason to vote for another candidate. Further more, Trump wasn't a normal politician, he had loads of business experience, he wasn't politically correct, and he sold an idea to inspire people. Regardless if he delivered or not on his promises, there were many reasons why people voted for him, and I don't consider thos…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 11:32 PM
3

You honestly think conservatives value stupidity, and you think there's no other reason why Trump was elected over Hillary than conservatives value stupidity?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 10:52 PM
9

More men dying to prostate cancer than women dying to breast cancer yet prostate cancer getting less than half the attention and funding is as retarded as not having a hurricane Jamaal?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:52 PM
4

Why don't you turn that strawmanning ability onto democrats and recognize the issues from that side? Let me guess, they don't do that kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:27 PM
3

And a huge part of that is providing support services to men so they can view themselves as valuable. You can't say it's all on men to just start viewing themselves as valuable when almost all of society overwhelmingly provides no support. Little to no DV shelters, hotlines laugh at or hang up on men, cops arrests men and not their abusers, family courts dismiss men, courts dismiss female perpetrators or severely downplay their culpability, etc. You can go on and on and find so many examples of …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:56 PM
3

How is a history of violence relevant to a violent case? How is a history of theft relevant in a theft case? If you don't have a history of violence, it's not relevant and it could help your case. If you don't have a history of making false claims or shitty behavior when it comes to sex, then it's not relevant and it could help your case. Edit: To add to this. The vast, vast majority of rapes aren't women being snatched up and raped by a stranger. The vast majority is a sexual encounter with som…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:09 PM
7

It fits in with how women view benevolent and hostile sexism vs equality. Amy Yeung did a study and women overwhelmingly viewed equality and hostile sexism as misogyny and benevolent sexism as positive with virtually no difference in hostile sexism and equality. If there is any hope in bringing out actual equality women overwhelmingly need to change their outlook on equality. As of right now, to most women equality = misogyny and benevolent sexism = acceptable.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:43 PM
24

It fits in with how women view benevolent and hostile sexism vs equality. Amy Yeung did a study and women overwhelmingly viewed equality and hostile sexismas misogyny and benevolent sexism as positive with virtually no difference in hostile sexism and equality. If there is any hope in bringing out actual equality women overwhelmingly need to change their outlook on equality. As of right now, to most women equality = misogyny and benevolent sexism = acceptable.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:43 PM
21

I would guess that it will take a long long time for this boy to ever trust any girl again, and I'd guess he will have quite a few issues interacting with them. I hope he can get some help and find some peace.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:03 PM
5

The best way is to get women to give a shit about men's issues. Part of that is highlighting how flawed feminism is, and how much of a benefit women get out of competent and happy men. If women want more social programs to help them, they should want more men making a lot more money to fund those social services. If women want to make it to the top of their company, they should want men to be equal parents. If women want to find that 'good guy', they'll advocate for programs that don't keep men …
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:51 PM
2

I don't think anyone in the MRA movement thinks male violence is ok or excused. Most of the DV posts are trying to bring to light that DV isn't male perpetrator, female victim only narrative. Maybe I'm missing something from this post?
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:30 PM
2

Family Law lawyer and mediator Michelle Duggan says parental rights do not distinguish between a mother and father and are determined by a court by what is in the best interests of the child or children. That's a blatant lie. Judges just about everywhere favor the mother heavily. There are a very select few judges that are gender neutral and even fewer that favor men. In some circumstances, shared orders can be deemed impractical because of the age or stage of the children and each parent's work…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:17 PM
5

What terrifies them so much? The evidence that their beliefs are worthless. That’s why they try to silence Peterson, as so many others. Which makes his message as ironic as it is overwhelmingly vital. Exactly. If they aren't victims, then their circumstances are their own doing. If they aren't oppressed, then they have to take their own destiny by the reigns. They didn't get that job because of sexism, they didn't get that job because they were abrasive with a terrible personality. You see the e…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:29 PM
2

Probably not, but perhaps there's an employer out there that may decide to not employ these two due to a false allegation lawsuit hanging around on their record. IANAL, so I have no idea if my assertion is correct. I was merely supposing that if I were an employer and an applicant had a history of false allegations, I would pass over that applicant in favor of someone that doesn't have that history.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:16 PM
2

Women coming out of college these days make more than men. The wage gap pretty much applies to motherhood, not women. Women who don't take significant time off for kids make as much or more than men. Women who don't pick softer careers in exchange for more flexibility make as much or more than men. I know folks already know that, and I'm just pointing it out that the huge push to close the wage gap means pushing women to make more and spend more than men, while blaming men for women's choice to …
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:13 PM
3

Of course, now this is changing where women can be the strong heroes, but the villains are still always men The issue with them being the strong heroes is that they are Mary Sues. No flaws and better in every way than their male counterparts. They have the moral high ground in every situation, and the only people who have flaws are the men on both sides. Nothing makes this more clear than the latest Star Wars. All the women are infallible, and all the men have some issue with them that makes the…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:08 PM
3

Male body image issues are very under recognized. For any guys out that that look into a mirror and see something that you have a hard time seeing as attractive, remember: You are probably straight and any dude in the mirror will probably be unattractive. (Except Ryan Reynolds, that attractive fuck) There probably a chick out that flicks her bean to the thought of you. You want to lose some belly fat? Sure, man, go ahead, but don't feel like you are worthless because of that belly fat. Be good t…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:43 PM
1

*Devour. Proofread your shit Squawker.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:37 PM
3

In feminism, men are allowed to have emotion when it benefits women or feminism. He is not allowed to have emotion if it doesn't benefit women or feminism. Crying about a female victim of something, that's fine. Crying about a male victim of something? I drink male tears all day will be the response.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:39 PM
4

Wouldn't the law suit follow those girls? Financially, sure, but later on in life when the question of 'have you ever been sued and why', this shit show would be visible.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:31 PM
5

To them, abuse is only abuse when it occurs to poor defenseless women, and not when it happens to a oppressor. Cathy Newman would have scored a ton of respect points by offering humility and accepting her defeat. Instead, it's much easier to reach for victimization. As for Bevan, she is an insufferable sexist piece of crap. She bans decentdissent and spews her hate. (sound like any subreddits we know and love?) It'll be so nice when folks like her are ridiculed for being the bad people they are …
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:09 PM
10

Feelings can change. Feelings can go from having a great night to despair when you realize he was only interested in sex and not a relationship. Feelings can go from disgust to lust when you realize that Lambo in the parking lot belongs to him. Convicting someone on pure feelings is absurd, especially when those feelings can't even be proven by anything.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:39 PM
3

And also, we both know that women most definitely don't enjoy rough sex at all.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:28 PM
9

There's also a skill gap when a women's Olympic team is beaten by 14 year old boys.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:06 PM
36

Another woman said she was never forced to not say no, but due to 'power dynamics' she felt like she should say yes because she wanted him to like her. How in the name of anything is this sexual misconduct? You were star struck by James. He asked you to do a sex scene. You agreed to it, and after the fact, you felt like it was sexual misconduct? Where was your 'no'? When are you doing to stand up for yourself?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:02 PM
1

Presented by women, with women only audience and everyone involved is a woman.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:36 PM
2

You spelled Anakin wrong.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:08 PM
1

If she's kidding, where's the joke? Ironic feminism is ironic?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:03 PM
1

I bet if she were to fix her views on men it would also fix her loneliness as well.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:02 PM
2

He's apologizing on behalf of all men, as if his dumbass behavior is something all men employ. The dude is a tool for what he did, though what he did wasn't any sort of sexual assault, and he's a tool for his self loathing and apologizing for all men. He wants to apologize for being a dick? That's fine, he can apologize for his own behavior. He doesn't get to apologize for my behavior.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:59 PM
2

Does she also do a lecture on toxic femininity that goes over behaviors such as: Submissiveness Excessive Reliance on others Lack of control on emotions There are a lot of problems with men reaching out for help, but is that a problem those men need to address, or is it a problem that there's a desperate lack of help services for men? Sure, a lot of male to male interactions involve men telling each other to man up, but there's a lot of social services out there that are specifically closed to m…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:26 PM
3

I like this article, and it expresses a lot of my thoughts. I don't think continuous enthusiastic consent advocates are really interested in making sure most sexual interactions are safe and consenting. It seems they are interested in catching men at some point and calling them rapists. Instead of empowering women to be able to say no, mean no, and not back down when saying no, they are initializing women by saying if they at any point, for any reason don't say yes, then it's rape. If they say y…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:12 PM
3

That teacher is a complete idiot. The chairs remind her of a day when she could fit in them and white male ghosts haunt her. Why even is this moron treated seriously?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:43 PM
5

Because policies are still being written on outdated data saying women are getting discriminated completely out of STEM, when it's not true. Then policies are written giving preferable treatment to women, when they don't need it. I mean, I don't care what sex does a job. I don't care what sex goes through whatever schooling. I do care if there is institutional bias against men in the name of mythology.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:22 PM
3

Yup, so much misogynistic abuse against Cathy. She was completely inundated with sexist and violent threats towards her, and she should be rightfully scared of Peterson supporters... Wait, I got that backwards. 30 to 1 abuse towards Peterson vs abuse towards Newman. Welcome to the textbook definition of claiming victimhood instead of accepting responsibility. Instead of humility, Newman shows cowardice by hiding behind threats of violence that are barely even there. If anyone should be fearful, …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:26 PM
1

Don't you dare lobsplain to me.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:09 PM
5

It's appalling to want to destroy the father of your children. Why? What do you get out of taking everything from him? I'd understand if he was an abusive piece of crap, but if he's a legit good father and you just don't get along, why try to rip his life out? Also, how in the world does a court think 8k a month is acceptable for child support. It doesn't seem like it's for actual child support, and it seems more like it's punishing a guy for no longer being married. What judge in their right mi…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:06 PM
1

Screenshot and archive the harassment and threats. Document every single interaction from this person, and if you can identify them, talk to a lawyer and take them and the evidence to the cops. Also, you need to present yourself as impeccable. Don't instigate anything, be as respectful as you can. Anything you do or say online will be used against you...pretty much everywhere. You can't say you are being abused when you are abusive yourself.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:34 PM
20

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175099/#!po=56.7961 https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/3972-researcher-what-hap-3972 https://squawker.org/culture-wars/ucla-shock-study-women-have-raped-3-6-million-american-men/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/ I included sexual assault in there, because the stigma is roughly the same, IE, women don't abuse men (they do) and women don't rape men (they do).
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:14 PM
1

Are you saying that using incorrect pronouns is as bad as using a well-known racial slur? Also, what would the real process for someone using this law to enforce the correct pronouns? Just because you say there's mental gymnastics doesn't mean there is mental gymnastics. Part of Jordan's issues with the law was how vague it is. I think it's a reach for someone to claim discrimination just when they are misgendered, and I think they need to prove discrimination like anyone else. Those misgenderin…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:43 PM
1

You see, it's really easy to maintain an echo chamber when you ban any and all dissenters. If you don't accept patriarchy theory and the absolute and total oppression of women as facts, your voice will be eliminated. Also, /u/saccharind won't bother coming here. Most of them are too scared to leave their safe spaces for fear of their arguments being annihilated by simple logic and facts.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:40 PM
2

So far, it's just a claim, not proven. Her career shouldn't be destroyed on allegations alone, just a like a dude's career shouldn't be destroyed on allegations alone. Now, if the allegations are proven true, she should face the music the way a guy would.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:03 PM
2

I routinely see extreme MRAs get called out and downvoted here. I rarely ever see extreme feminists get the same treatment in any feminist sub. Guy here says women are trash and gets downvotes and warnings. Feminist in their subs says men are trash and 40 upvotes with tons of "I agree" responses. Responses with, "come on, that's not true." get #notallmen'd and downvoted. I'd be more receptive of feminism if they policed their own hate, but since they don't, I'm not going to even try to be an "al…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:44 PM
2

What do you mean his position on trans protections? He says he's perfectly fine with calling a person what they want to be called; he's just against the government forcing people to call trans people what they want. I mean, I shouldn't be forced to use feminine pronouns when referring to a woman, so I don't think I should be forced to use a trans person's preferred pronouns, either. Sure, I look like a dick if I do, but I shouldn't be tossed in jail, either. Bringing the government in this is cl…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:32 PM
60

One way to encourage these relationships is to have more people at the top of companies who are not straight white men. In interviews, women in companies with many female or gay executives were more likely to say one-on-one relationships had never been an issue for them. Well, let's go from talking about a difficult issue to being straight up racist and sexist. Instead of talking about how to interact with that pesky straight white male or how to alleviate the fear of an allegation, let's just g…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:20 PM
1

That and downvotes speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:14 PM
1

I mean, who are the real feminists? The very very small minority that want true equality between the sexes and are cool with fighting for men's issues, or the very very huge majority with political and financial power that are only for increased female power and actively oppose men's issues? Based on the actions of the prominent majority of feminists, they are the true feminists, and the small minority are merely egalitarians that have a ridiculous attachment to the word "feminism". As for Dulut…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:00 PM
2

I did, but you ignored it in favor of insults. I can't decide if you should be featured on r/iamverysmart or r/quityourbullshit. Maybe you can keep going and shoot for both?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:31 PM
2

So not done insulting? You should have never been anything more than a cum stain.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:13 PM
3

And idiots like you will continue to regurgitate your Bernie Sanders propaganda. If you are done slinging insults, then you can have a debate. Capitalism isn't perfect, by far, but it's the best system so far. It out competes any other economic system by land slides and it allows for equal opportunity. As for deaths by capitalism, prove it's capitalism that killed those people. Prove that those people would not have died under other economic schemes.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:55 PM
1

Not just that, but a lot of those surveys report a decent occurance against men, too. Which means all these anti sexual assault movements happily ignore a huge chunk of the population that reports sexual harassment and assault. Report says 1 in 5 women and 1 in 7 men report experiencing assault. Feminists blast men and lobby for men to attend consent courses and thousands of articles are written about how shitty men are and how men need to take responsibility for all the sexual assault going on.…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:43 PM
1

Isn't this blatant discrimination that can be punished by a court?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:48 PM
2

For every woman that is treated unfairly in tech, I would wager there's another woman who's completely insufferable and entitled, complaining she's treated unfairly when she's just treated as the horrible person she is.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:08 PM
5

On their website, the men's domestic violence helpline: Hotline Provides 24 hour service telephone counselling, information and referral to ongoing face to face services, if required, for men who are concerned about their violent and abusive behaviours. Their page on violence against men: Violence against men and other forms of violence Men’s violence against women is not the only form of violence. White Ribbon acknowledges that violence is experienced by both men and women. The majority of dome…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:54 PM
1

Who's chopping onions? Good on this dude and son.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:40 PM
2

This is a great article. I hope it gets the publicity it deserves.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:36 PM
22

@MancZombie proves his point by telling him to shut up.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:02 PM
4

I lost brain cells listening to her. She twists his words over and over again. "So you think that women should just give up" Where the fuck did you get that from? Being agreeable and passive aren't traits that succeed at the top, so in order to succeed at the top, be disagreeable and aggressive. Gender doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:38 PM
1

Absolutely it is, which is why movements should police those that act poorly as the face of the movement. I don't see that at all with feminists. I see tons of people in this sub that call out folks for spilling bullshit. I'm not saying no bullshit gets through, nor am I saying that there aren't guys in the MRM that straight up hate women. Just saying I see those types of viewpoints usually don't get a lot of support and often times they get called out for their bullshit and hatred.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:05 PM
9

I've seen sooooo many feminists online make this exact claim. I'm the real feminist, those other feminists don't really represent the movement, despite them having all the financial and political power. Me. Anonymous user X. Not multi-billion dollar organizations. I also won't actively condemn those organizations and to my friends, I actually condone them. But yeah, I'm totes for equality. For women. Only women. I think it's just a virtue signal so that people against feminism won't come down so…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:41 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/7r08zn/if_we_accept_that_there_is_such_a_thing_as_toxic/dstdh8u/ This right there. Violence and repressed emotions are shit that men do. Child violence is something women do. The first is obviously toxic masculinity, the second, well you see, it's not gendered!! No excuse for males, plethora of excuses for females.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:12 PM
0

If I were to compare the movements to blackjack, I'd say MRM is about having a good head for the game and making sure everyone gets a shot at playing. Red pill is about counting cards and playing as many seats as possible. MGTOW is about walking past the game and not even playing. I think women deserve a baseline of decency and respect, and I believe there should be equal rights for men and women. If a woman succeeds, it's because she made herself succeed. She may have had help from her parents …
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:59 PM
1

where I am destined to work away my life as a wage slave. Sounds like you swallowed a bit of the communist manifesto. You do work for an employer, and they provide a paycheck. That's not wage slave, that's a great deal. I mean, you could provide work for someone, and they could not pay you at all. You take that money they pay you, and you get to do whatever you want with it. Learn new skills, get new hobbies, buy new shit (or old shit, whatever), and find out how great it is to live your life. Y…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:42 PM
12

I thinks it's pointless. "Don't objectify me!" - says woman who's intentionally objectifying herself. You wanna say you are worth more than your looks? I'd argue that by actually having some character and morality will get you closer to that goal than by taking your clothes off and screaming at men.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:34 PM
2

The whole Aziz thing would have been a non-issue if it was Chris Hemsworth instead of Aziz. Exact same behavior from him, but if he was hot, she would have not cared an ounce about the wine. In fact, she would have appreciated him picking white due to going out for oysters later. She would have loved that he sat and listened to her for a couple of hours. She would have been floored that he ate her out on the fresh marble counter. But, Azis isn't 6'3" and super chiseled; he's a small, awkward dud…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:18 PM
15

Maybe it's an ironic piece of how women view men as trash unworthy of talking to them?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:56 PM
1

Voted in by women, whom are the majority of voters.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:47 AM
2

There's a few cases going on right now in the UK: Jemma Beale accuses 15 men of rape. Liam Allen cleared of rape when withheld evidence is exposed. UK Footballer cleared of rape by jury Issaac Itiary cleared when withheld evidence comes to light about her lying about her age. Nikki Yovino accuses 2 guys of raping her so she could get support from a potential boyfriend. Edit: the last one wasn't the UK, but still an example of just being ok with destroying other men purely to be with another guy.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:46 PM
2

https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx is another exoneration website, and you can sort by false accusations.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:33 PM
2

Friend of mine moved to a different state, because his wife wanted to go back 'home' near her family. He finds a job, and moves down here. She drags her feet on getting their old house ready to be sold and finding a job where her husband just moved. He lives in a house about 20 miles away from where he was working (he was hired on as my new boss) that belonged to her family. Fast forward a couple years, and me and him get to be pretty good friends. He gets back into roller derby (he used to ref)…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:28 PM
19

Another case of a woman going after sex, getting it, and then pretending she never went after it. Maybe she didn't remember what happened, but why automatically say it was rape? It's almost like, if a woman has 1 sip of alcohol, don't touch her. Is that what women want?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:31 PM
11

It's great that he will be getting paid for this, as the road he built was good enough for cars. This dude is awesome.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:16 PM
16

Back before I was banned on askfeminists, I got pretty heavily downvoted for saying, 'Sure, there are some women out there that are oppressed, but that doesn't mean every woman is oppressed.' Dear sweet lord did I apparently hurt a bunch of feelings by saying that. Michelle Obama sure is oppressed....
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:26 PM
2

You should always have the right to face your accuser, and she completely misses this point. Allowing people to anonymously make claims is detrimental. I wonder if any guys in media will start banning women from anything that's not purely screentime? I wonder if men who have control will either bail out and leave the media (leaving fewer established areas for women to enter in) or just quit being anywhere near women (leaving fewer opportunities for women to grow into those roles). I also wonder …
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:20 PM
15

Did you tell her that every single person probably fears leaving their house at 1 am and it's not a woman thing?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:56 PM
4

Getting other men to not judge men for experiencing domestic violence is definitely something that needs to be done. Getting men to reach to government services, IE the cops or hotlines requires a major overhaul of both.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:02 PM
3

"As women we do not recognise ourselves in this feminism, which beyond denouncing the abuse of power, takes on a hatred of men and of sexuality." They insisted that women were "sufficiently aware that the sexual urge is by its nature wild and aggressive. But we are also clear-eyed enough not to confuse an awkward attempt to pick someone up with a sexual attack." Pretty much. A few arguments I've had with folks recently is against people claiming to not ever even talk to a woman if you don't alre…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:25 PM
13

Which is why they only really talk about this stuff in their safe little echo chamber and ban anything that makes them think.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 06:14 PM
11

High risk AND high reward. If she wanted to put food on the table, there's a plethora of other jobs out there that put food on tables where you can keep your clothes on. AND she could have also took her clothes off for $100/day. AND she could have negotiated for more pay. Most studies show that women who negotiate tend to get paid more, so I'm not seeing where she's a victim. She signed a contract agreeing her naked body was worth $100/day. She should accept responsibility for that.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:51 PM
6

It was asked and promptly ignored.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:55 AM
32

It is not about retaliation, before now, men and women’s rights have been violated. We have men and boys who have been bartered or discriminated against, but the ones that have been reported most are those of the female. Men have probably decided to keep quiet, because they feel a man should not cry or complain about being violated by a woman. Maybe. Maybe it's because when they call the cops, the cops will more than likely arrest them instead of their abuser. Maybe it's because if they call a h…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:37 PM
12

Use facts and avoid name calling. Be resistant to them moving goalposts, be especially wary of woozled figures like the 1 in 4 rape myth. The most important thing to remember is you aren't arguing to sway the feminist. I mean, you might, but you also might get a die hard Christian to admit that Jesus Christ wasn't the savior, but was just a really decent guy in an indecent time. (Just as an example, not making any claims one way or the other) you most likely won't get anywhere with the feminist.…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 05:05 PM
7

Imagine the dad jokes. "Haha, you're funny!" "No, I'm Dad!" "Hi Dad, I'm Dad!" etc...
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:36 PM
3

To where? If all your money is taken up by mortgage and bills, how will you afford a different place with its own rent and bills? Move out to street and be homeless?
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:20 PM
1

Porque no los dos?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:28 PM
9

You won't get those privileges without reform, though. You may find a judge that'll grant you custody, you may find a judge that doesn't give a fuck if your wife spends 0 time with the kids, she's getting full custody. Without changing to default shared custody to start, you'll rely of judges who have their own fair share of bias to determine if you are a dad. The system isn't set up for the main parent to get custody, it's set up for the woman to get custody.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter