TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

armedburrito Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by armedburrito on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Did you mean to respond to me? Neither I, nor the guy I was responding to are news outlets, either. The point we were both making is that sexualizing people we see is normal, and doesn't have to necessarily be at the expense of appreciating them for their accomplishments.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:46 PM
4

Cycle of abuse. These guys have been treated like shit when they make comments about women, and now want to push that shitty moment off onto others. Media probably shouldn't be so blatantly focusing on the dude's dicks, but let's be real, some olympians are fucking hot. I didn't just like that Australian runner who did her bouncy warmups because I liked her energy, and anytime I see a skier in a speed suit, I'm checking her rack. Just tacky to be that explicit in conversation, but it's also huma…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:24 PM
1

It made sense, but it was wrong, unless I reinterpret if for you, because you are a poor communicator, which is what I did.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/17 06:07 AM
1

Says the guy who can't convey simple concepts.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/17 07:08 PM
1

read my other comments. Uh, no? Say what you mean, when you say it.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/17 06:08 PM
2

Yeah, I mean, if you like the Beatles, your parents are garbage. It's not about people who do drugs, it's about people who glorify drugs, especially not using them in moderation.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/17 05:49 AM
4

Well American Law disagrees. The police have a right to detain you without charges, for a period of time, and in most states, citizens have the right to detain somebody they believe has committed a crime. She coulda just argued the case to the cops and proven her point, even sued. Instead she caused property damage and assaulted an officer.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/17 10:22 PM
1

So you are one of those beta guys, who a woman only finds valuable for property, but then a viking man came along and stole her from you, because your money obviously hasn't prevented you from being a boring asshole? I grew the beard because I got too lazy to shave, and I keep it, because chicks dig it. Let me guess, yours comes in looking like pubes, because if anybody here is the beta, it's the guy who gave half his property to some chick? Sucks for that guy you know, but I've literally been t…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 04:04 AM
1

So you are one of those beta guys, who a woman only finds valuable for property, but then a viking man came along and stole her from you, because your money obviously hasn't prevented you from being a boring asshole? I grew the beard because I got too lazy to shave, and I keep it, because chicks dig it. Let me guess, yours comes in looking like pubes, because if anybody here is the beta, it's the guy who gave half his property to some chick?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:38 AM
1

Probably because you are stupid enough to keep responding. Probably because you tried to justify blatant sexism, with stupid, weak arguments, and expect me to just roll with it. What's it like giving away half your property? Let me guess, there were plenty of warning signs that she was shallow before it happened, but since you are weak, and were getting pussy, you looked the other way? But it's her fault, not yours, of course.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:44 PM
1

Keep blaming women for your shitty character.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:34 PM
1

I'm not trying to convince anybody. I'm trying to shine a light on your pathetic, self-inflicted life.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:11 PM
1

The difference is, that other people call me viking as well. You're the one getting fucked by shitty women, good luck with that. I'm sure your shitty character judgement won't be a problem again, though.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:59 PM
1

Haha, I'm sure you were a saint. Again, it boils down to the fact that if you invested in a man, the same way, you would be just as capable of being burned. Again, I take solace in the fact that most decent women wouldn't waste their time on you, in the first place, leaving a better market for viking overlords like myself.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 11:30 PM
1

A well structured prenuptial will do plenty. The important thing, is being careful with who you invest in. Just because you've been burned by your shitty judge of character doesn't mean women are any worse than men. Notice the super rich attractive celebrities, don't all have super model wives? It's not because they can't land a model, it's because they found someone who's worth the investment. I'm guessing your only basis for finding a partner is how hot she is.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 08:02 PM
0

Nobody said women were inferior, you just implied that. They choose to act like children....women consistently choose the low road. You are pathetic. I'm not being chivalrous. I don't go out of my way to defend or take anybody's shit, man or woman. If you were burned by women, it's because you chose shitty people to spend your time with. That's on you.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:48 PM
-5

The average person acts like a fucking child. Period. Youtube is your evidence? What a faggot. Who's the primary perpetrator of those stupid 'prank,' videos? Men. It's one thing to advocate for men's rights, it's entirely another to act like women are inferior to men, and it's exactly that treatment, which has led to the double standards that society sometimes has. Divorce raped, lol. Nah. That shit mostly happens to losers who marry shitty women, simply because they're hot. Kinda like how you a…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:56 PM
-12

You realize most people get away with most crimes, right? Just because some judge gave her a pass, doesn't mean that, 'women are children.' If anything, men treating women like children, is much more the problem than women acting like children. Historically, men have abandoned their children at much greater rates than women, right? I'd say if we are using averages and statistics, women are much more bound to take responsibility for their shitty decisions than men, which is a sign of maturity. Go…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:59 AM
-2

Maybe you should read the guy's other comments, before you go around assuming he's joking. Edit: Also, this might come as a surprise, but men act like children, too.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:49 AM
4

LOL. You are a complete fucking idiot. 'Men's rights,' doesn't have to involve denigrating women, and statements like yours, are exactly why it's so easy to lump this sub in with TRP and T_D. I'm glad you've only met immature women, leaves the quality ones for men who aren't shitbags like yourself.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:13 AM
-9

'women are children,' -- positive vote score, not flagged as controversial. 'comment indicating dissatisfaction with blatant, unfounded stereotyping' - 1/3 the points and flagged as controversial. And some of you guys wonder why this sub is lumped in with TRP, T_D, and other tard subs.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 03:26 AM
1

No, I think KiA and gamergate's original goals of shaming and exposing the incompetence of gaming press has mostly been accomplished. Personally, I'd rather that KiA be relatively quiet and still revolve around games and logic, than SJWs and identity politics.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:59 PM
3

KIA has become another satellite sub to td. They hardly talk about video games at all. I'm opposed to the 'sjw' thing, but people who dedicate that much time to being anti sjw, are going to attract people who are just as obsessed with identity politics.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:11 PM
3

Yeah, a lot of people choose to be miners and industrial workers and janitors and sanitation workers, and would never want to work in the office, doing admin work, often for better pay. People, for the most part, don't choose their career paths, they fall into what's available, and a lot of the cushy, low education jobs, are dominated by women. It's next to impossible to even get an interview for office work without significantly better credentials. Zero evidence or logic? I think you're project…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:13 PM
2

Haha, within your first sentence you make sweeping generalizations, and apply small cases to be indicative of the whole. I'll agree that this sub is full of thinly veiled misogyny, and I don't come in here unless it hits front page of r/all, but it's ultimately a justice porn knockoff, and the posts that make it to r/all are usually pretty 'just' imo. Now let's look at your statement about how overall society and white people and privilege, and other bullshit, yada yada. The overall trend of soc…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 03:13 AM
4

Yeah. Let's extrapolate all of society based on anecdotes. I can tell you are at the head of your class. Do you honestly think that women never get treated beneficially different because of their gender? How many stories do you think I can find on Google of girls who make false accusations, and aren't charged for it? Oh wait, I don't have to check. We have a sub dedicated to finding instances where they don't get away with it, so clearly, we can deduce that they never get away with it. If you wa…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/16 01:13 AM
2

In some ways I support this, in some ways I don't. I think a frontline combatant should meet these qualifications, but I think that there can be combat roles that aren't exactly front line. Russian and Korean female snipers are pretty famous for getting the job done, but didn't need to be carrying hundreds of pounds of gear.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/16 04:29 PM
15

If you are familiar with rainn.org, one of the leading rape counseling/advocate organizations, they specifically state that anti-female rape culture does not exist in the U.S. and that saying it does exist, is even more damaging. https://rainn.org/news-room/rainn-urges-white-house-task-force-to-overhaul-colleges-treatment-of-rape
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:48 PM
6

Right, because as we all know, the job you work is a clear indication of moral character.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:10 PM
1

Are you mad? After you've invested all that energy into thinking you're smart, only to realize you are just as bad as the thing you hate, Mr Tumblrina? Projecting your failures on to me won't save you from yourself.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:42 AM
0

Zing. Not only are you fucking retarded, apparently that gives you the ability to read minds through the internet. Seriously, your philosophy 101 bullshit only impresses yourself. My logic never fell apart, because you never managed to redefine the word supremacy in the English language. Keep trying, though tumblrina. If you believe and say that the definition is different enough times, people even dumber than yourself might start agreeing, and so long as you stick to your retard hugboxes, you w…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:49 PM
1

Good one. Yet another meme in the form of 'u mad bro?' I can see why you are the smartest kid in your philosophy class.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:39 PM
0

Considering that you are the kind of retard that uses 'rekt,' and thinks going 1-19 is a 'form of supremacy,' I'm not really worried about your assessment.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:18 PM
0

Ok tumblrina. Supremacy is getting the occasional win, and harassment is whatever the victim says it is and black people can't be racist.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:50 AM
1

Yup, still fucking stupid. Men were allowed to hit their dependents, but occasionally, usually under extremely egregious circumstances, they were prosecuted for it. That's not supremacy or dominance, though, because on rare occasions, there were consequences. Totally fucking stupid. You realize that slave owners were occasionally prosecuted for beating their slaves as well, right? But I guess that was just one of the benefits of being a slave master, and as we all know, there were plenty of bene…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:14 AM
1

Yawn. Retard who thinks women gaining the right to vote is a form of supremacy, meanwhile, asserting that men having the legal right to beat their wives is not indicative of the fact that men have historically dominated women. Good thing you stick to the retard subs.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:55 PM
0

Any half intelligent person should know that a supremacy movement is the same as being supremacist. I don't try to reason with tumblrina idiots who change the definition of words to suit them, divorced from their actual definition, and I'm not going to try with you. The fact that it was legal, means that men were protected when treating their women like shit. Sounds like supremacy to me. That's only the stuff that was written down. I call it philosophy 101, because you have a juvenile perspectiv…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:51 PM
0

Holy shit, do you honestly think the word supremacy is that far away from supremacist? Do you honestly think their definitions are vastly different? Treated like property, as in beating your wife was totally legal for a good portion of American history. But I'm not gonna go farther than that, and get sucked into your philosophy 101, bullshit. When you base arguments on false premises, like the idea that supremacy and supremacist are different ideas, your conclusions are inherently flawed. It's b…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:29 AM
0

Uhhh, women have been treated as property for most of American history as well. But again, if you want to call women getting the vote, after the country had existed for 150 years, a form of supremacy, you go ahead. If you want to call modern feminism a supremacist movement, then men's rights would qualify as well, but again, you are not using the term supremacist accurately.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:09 AM
0

men have never had supremacy over women. Seriously. If you believe that, there's no point in reasoning with you. When you write long responses that ramble and ultimately make no point, until the end, you're demanding my attention, with absolutely no reason to deserve it. It's quite frustrating. A failed conclusion, based on a false premise, after pages of rambling uselessness. It's a waste of my time, and that is much more offensive to me than words. Again, supremacy involves domination. There h…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:52 AM
0

Yeah, keep your philosophy 101 bullshit to yourself. Going on a million tangents and trying to make a counter point to every sentence I make is fucking juvenile. Bottom line is, supremacy is a specific term, that you apparently don't know the definition of. If you want to pretend that the gradual assumption of fundamental rights that men have been born into for centuries is a form of supremacy, you are either stupid or trolling. Again, supremacy means something specific, not just, 'I win one rou…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:41 AM
0

Ok, most of that is pointless, if not flat out fucking wrong, so I'll skip to the end. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supremacy http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supreme Having benefits, or different obligations, is not the same as supremacy. Supremacy isn't having some things up and some things down, it's a form of domination. If you want to say women not having to sign up for the draft is the same as women having supremacy... wow... go for it.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:31 AM
0

I don't know why it's easy to assume that one movement or another would inevitably result in supremacy. If you think any movement for gender would ultimately result in a supremacy movement, then you must concede that MRA is also subject to the same problems, yes? Equality is something that's been getting better all the time, for everyone, the average cis white man included. Even the poor have far more rights than they used to. In many cases, those rights weren't handed out. They had to be advoca…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:33 AM
-1

No, you didn't sign up for the selective service to vote. It's just illegal for you to not sign up as a man. Period. You don't have the choice of not registering for the draft, and also not voting. And apparently you like to use words completely separate from their actual definition. Good times.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:58 AM
0

Of course, because the right to vote is predicated on the draft, not on the intrinsic rights of an individual to deserve equal representation. You do understand the definition of a right, correct? As in, it's something you are fucking born with. You are thinking of the 'privilege to vote,' not the 'right to vote.' Thanks for making it clear you are one of the retards who actually does believe feminism is supremacist Still a retard.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:40 AM
-3

Haha. Obviously, you've taken classes on rhetoric. Too bad you skipped the ones on logic.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:29 AM
-4

Ah, 'sure bud.' Is a classic moron response. That's a new one to me. I see we have another contender to the retard throne. And then we get into the real retard statements. I mentioned something in casual conversation, therefore it's my responsibility to spend my time citing sources, so I can educate morons like yourself. If there ever were a classic moron response on reddit, it's the demand for somebody to cite a source in casual conversation. While we're being idiots and demanding the citation …
/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:01 AM
-6

That's funny, because you didn't respond to OP making a stupid fucking generalization about women's rights being about supremacy. Retard.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:27 AM
-6

Oh, well since all feminists were really just looking for supremacy, then all MRAs are just misogynists. Retard.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:08 AM
-7

Oh, well since all feminists were really just looking for supremacy, then all MRAs are just misogynists. Retard.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:08 AM
-7

Yeah, too bad they aren't allowed to do that, because men said so.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 11:48 PM
-4

Hands douchebag a dunce cap.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 11:47 PM
-11

Sure bud. I guess they should have just been happy with being treated as second class citizens. Were the slaves fighting for emancipation, also a supremacy movement? How about the fact that women still don't have the right to decide what they do with their own bodies, in some states? You are a moron. Idiots like you are the reason I stopped calling myself either a feminist or an MRA.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 11:45 PM
-8

Haha, yeah those stupid bitches campaiging for the right to vote and own property were just doing it to oppress men.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:42 PM
-4

Personally I call the tumblrinas feminism 2.9. They just take archaic stupid ideas like male gaze and rape culture, which originated in 2.0, and ratchet those ideas up. If anybody is 3rd wave its people like christina.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:40 PM
1

A soldier's job is to pull a trigger nowadays. I think women have the potential to work in the infantry, though no, probably not in a close quarters combat situation where it could come down to punching another guy to death. If a girl can carry a rifle, and run 15 miles in a day, then she can be used on a battlefield.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:54 AM
1

It says separation, not divorce. Not sure if that was just poor word choice or intentional.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 04:18 AM
1

It seems like neither of these people are fit to rear a child.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:16 AM
4

He's saying that if you wanted everybody to be treated fairly today, you would be called a racist for not supporting things like affirmative action.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:32 PM
2

Correlation is not causation, but a lot of the vegans I meet are exactly like this. They do things because it's trendy and feel-good, not because they reason it out.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:15 PM
1

No, this is a common thing that stupid people do. Just because you aren't liberal doesn't mean that all liberals are stupid. Plenty of conservatives use these reflexive vapid arguments, too. Also, calling people who disagree with you, 'bullies,' is fucking ignorant.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:12 PM
1

IMO, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 02:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter