TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arseitz Archive

View 2 posts and 57 comments by arseitz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Pretty sure the story was Clapton fucking Harrison's wife (inspiration for Layla)
/r/TheRedPill17/11/23 04:26 AM
1

'long detailed messages'...she lost interest because you over-invested. Limit your text-game to logistics, and move on from this one.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/22 05:22 AM
6

...Kinda like calling everything autistic?
/r/TheRedPill26/10/18 12:29 PM
7

He was saying that her negative feature makes her less intimidating to guys, which is an insult.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 09:17 PM
3

That's how I read it. Balance 'falling'
/r/TheRedPill31/07/17 10:16 PM
8

If you take two seconds to look at the account history, it is clearly a troll. Nothing to see here...
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:25 PM
16

I don't think he was defending it..
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:06 PM
1

Many of those Middle-Eastern countries reporting really low numbers are not counting suicides properly, for cultural and religious reasons.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:06 PM
1

It is cultural. Girls fight on the playground too, and many boys are more mature than girls at a younger age. Environment is huge. Once the hormones start kicking in it's a different story.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:04 AM
1

You are absolutely right, although I don't think it's necessarily setting the child up for social failure. Once the boy sees how other boys dress and act, he will likely be inclined to dress as they do.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:42 AM
2

I'm not an expert, but I'm fairly certain that until the hormonal changes associated with puberty kick in, there are no fundamental differences between boys and girls, aside from genitalia. I think it's less about hiding who the child is, and more about allowing the child to be a child.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:06 AM
2

I came to say exactly this. Although he should be allowed to wear cargo pants.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:02 AM
1

the use of female leads makes it easier to care about what happens to the characters you have no reason to care about That's exactly my point. Why do we care more for female characters? Horror movies often resort to/exploit the use of female death to make it more 'horrific'.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:16 AM
10

The botched circumcision comment struck me as particularly unnecessary and callous.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:37 PM
0

Everyone who is saying dump her is being irrational. She is only 20. Women are perfectly capable of being reasoned with. I suspect that she's never had someone explain why it's wrong for her to hit men. Give her a chance.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:57 PM
1

I was a big brother to a sixth grade boy when I was a senior in high school. It was set up through the school, and it was a perfectly positive experience. All interactions occurred at his school, and I was among peers and their respective little siblings. I'm not sure what your circumstances are or under what capacity you will be a big brother, so maybe my experience is too different to relate to.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:53 AM
4

Being that I grew up in a military family, I would also like to mention that the military bestows all kinds of respect of soldier's wives and kids, praising their bravery while their husband/father is away.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:22 PM
1

Have you ever been extremely drunk, or close to blackout drunk, or blackout drunk? You don't have to be passed out to be incapable of giving reasonable consent.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:43 AM
0

I'm not saying that at all. But you believe that rapists should be able to get away with it over and over again.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:47 PM
0

People do that. It's called victim blaming. The sober party should be responsible enough to recognize that the other person is incapable of consenting to his/her full capacity.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:31 PM
0

Because certainly a man can't be held accountable for his decision to take advantage of an intoxicated person. He's just a sex driven animal with no capacity to make sound moral decisions. The responsibility should be placed on the woman. Edit: /sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:02 PM
1

You're insane. I can guarantee you that you are a minority on this subreddit. An insane minority. Stop protecting rapists.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:28 PM
1

Well I'd say if they are both drunk neither of them were able to consent, so no rape occurred.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:01 AM
1

Where do you draw the line though? Clearly having sex with someone who is blackout drunk is wrong? What if the person is a virgin, and they have no experience drinking? Is it okay for a 35 year old skeezball to take an blackout drunk 18 year old virgin to his place and have sex with her? Sex is a pretty serious act, with potentially dire consequences.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:42 AM
1

...but the person who took your money can be arrested...and charged with a crime...and sent to jail.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:19 AM
1

You don't think the sober party has any responsibility?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:02 AM
1

So if someone is taken advantage of whilst drinking, they were asking for it? Wow.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:44 AM
1

You clearly either have very little experience with drinking or you are sick in the head. Alcohol seriously clouds a person's judgement, and taking advantage of that is rape. This sort of ideology is why the men's rights movement has such horrible image.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:18 PM
1

So you think it's okay to have sex with a drunk person if you're sober? And I was referring to the rape being their fault, not the drinking.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:26 PM
1

So you think it's okay to have sex with a drunk person if you're sober? It's their fault for drinking?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:30 PM
1

If I'm sober and I have sex with a drunk girl, I raped her. If we're both drunk, it's both our faults and neither of our faults. Just like if I'm sober and I convince a drunk person to drive, I should be held responsible.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:47 PM
8

You are clearly not a good representative of MRA's, but rather an embarrassment. I feel like I'm talking to a 12 year old. You fail time and time again to raise a semi-coherent response to my assertion. Are you telling me that you wouldn't be upset if someone said that "Men these days aren't learning compassion from the people their supposed to learn it from, their moms and sisters" Please actually respond to me or shut up.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:51 PM
1

Um, are you replying to me? That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:41 PM
8

That's quite the generalization. A lot of women are as you described, as are many men. But saying that men are the only source of sanity and reality is sexist. I stand by that.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:30 PM
4

Yes I would. I fail to see how this has anything to do with what I'm saying though...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:18 PM
8

If you came across a feminist article that said that, you would be up in arms. You would post a link to said article, and it would make the front page. You are lying to yourself.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:22 AM
8

"Men these days aren't learning compassion from the people their supposed to learn it from, their moms and sisters" Front page material on Men's Rights. Don't kid yourself.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:11 AM
9

One more time. And the one place they could have got their reality, the place they're supposed to get it - the men in their lives, their dads and husbands and brothers and boyfriends. Don't try to be offended.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:48 AM
14

Ummm, maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying women cannot learn reality from other women in their lives? I don't think anyone has to look hard to see the blatant sexism.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:34 AM
1

To those that consensual sex is not common sense, well they're most likely a rapist and telling them not to rape would not convince them to change. I'm not sure if you are giving people enough credit. I mean of course there are sociopaths who feel no remorse for their actions, and telling them that rape is wrong won't do much good. But a lot of men/women who have raped (alcohol involved) are good people who probably weren't fully aware of the gravity of their actions. If they had been told somew…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:01 PM
1

I want to agree with you, but couldn't you say that there's no point in telling a woman not to protect herself? Couldn't you say that some women simply aren't going to take necessary precautions, so it's important that men are aware of what qualifies as 'rape' and what qualifies as 'consent'? Edit: And I'm referring to your second paragraph. I agree with your first paragraph.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:20 PM
1

In most cases.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:01 AM
3

Yeah several of the responses were actually by men who are sexually submissive, and view the video in a sexualized manner. These types of men are in danger of juxtaposing fantasy with reality, and not seeing the harm in non-consensual aggression. They confuse violence with power play.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:01 PM
1

The woman has every right to be upset that he wants to donate his DNA, just as a man can be upset if his wife wants to donate an egg. When you marry someone, you are saying you want to devote yourself to that person. That being said, requiring spousal consent does seem unfair in light of the lack of reproductive rights for men. She shouldn't be pushing for law-reform. But she has my sympathy.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:56 AM
0

Yeah the problem is that we're talking about child support, not abortion.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:24 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:14 PM
1

I'd go with 2. The problem arises when the couple can't agree on what to do with the child. If the man chooses to absolve himself of all parental responsibilities, that is NOT putting him on equal footing with the woman. She then has to make a decision. If she aborts, she has to pay for it. If she keeps it, she has to pay for it. She can give it up for adoption or abandon it as well, but then she still has to deal with nine months of carrying and caring for the child. Men DO have to do something…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:10 PM
1

Agreed. By consensual I intended to imply that trust was not being violated.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:48 AM
2

I think what he's saying is the man should have to help pay for the abortion.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:28 AM
-1

Wow. Kinda uncalled for. I'm sure Men'sRights is proud of you.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:23 AM
-3

With adoption and safe haven it then becomes everyone else's financial burden. And you're forgetting the physical burden that the woman is faced with, for nine months potentially. And if she does want an abortion, does she have to pay for it?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:00 AM
-5

But when you include people who have a narrower moral scope than you, there isn't really much of a choice for them. You can't expect someone to do something they find morally repulsive.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:57 AM
0

And I'm with you 100% on this. Kids need dads.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:54 AM
-4

I do understand that. But many of the angrier men (yourself included I imagine) don't understand is that not everyone has the same views on abortion. And women are in the unique predicament of being faced with that choice. It's easy for a man to walk away. If the woman walks away as well than the child is a problem for the state. People need to take responsibility for the risks involved in the wonderful act of sex, and not make it other peoples responsibility (the taxpayer).
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:52 AM
0

I agree with you completely. Some people don't think men should have to pay a thing if they don't want. That's the issue I'm addressing.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:47 AM
1

You have experience raising children so I'll take your word over my 'guesses'. I do think that where you live makes a big difference, and that's not something I took into account. Here in North Dakota the cost of living is very low (in Fargo, quite the opposite for the oil counties) so I might have a different perspective. I'm also coming from the perspective of someone with a relatively low income. I still may be wrong though.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:06 PM
2

I agree with you for the most part, but $350 for one child for a month? For that to be fair a child would have to cost $700 to care for monthly (maybe less if you think the man owes more since he doesn't have the responsibility to care for the child). I'm sure plenty of the money goes to the mother.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 09:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter