TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

arsevolcano Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by arsevolcano on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

She was obviously drunk. Judge says the only description of this can be 'tragedy'. How about 'outrage'?
/r/PussyPass31/05/15 08:25 AM
16

She did not get sent to prison. Suspended sentence means freedom unless you commit another crime. He has been left with facial scars, the article says so. Or do you mean you need to see just how bad his facial scars are? She exposed his skull by hitting it with a bottle, unprovoked, not self defence. Men have no protection under the law. Men are persecuted by the law.
/r/PussyPass02/05/15 06:46 AM
8

You just take law as a degree in UK starting at 18.
/r/PussyPass02/05/15 06:39 AM
3

Your method is too crude. It is more accurate to look at the prosecution/conviction/sentencing of 100 men/100 women for the same crime and compare them. Looking at total numbers takes no account of how many people were arrested for each offence originally. There is definitely a bias against men/ethnic minorities at every stage of criminal justice which feeds through into massively inflated rates of incarceration for both groups, but the scale of discrimination cannot be quantified by just measur…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:27 PM
1

Just so you know, 15-14=1, not 2.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:09 AM
1

What is unsubstantiated is the CDC contention that Gardasil is safe whilst concealing the numbers of deaths and serious side effects after immunisation. Dr Harper is critical of the fact that patients are not being given accurate information about vaccine side effects. It is far from anti vax. This sort of shout down brainwashed behaviour is a big part of all sorts of problems.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:44 AM
3

60% of US prison population is ethnic minority - a massive imbalance by any measure. I certainly agree though there is no recognition of the disadvantages men face, quite the opposite in fact.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:22 AM

Fact is, if it was a cop who took a beating they would turn the town upside down to find them, then prosecute. They apply the law inconsistently. As a result, men suffer massive disadvantage in the criminal justice system, just as blacks do, so white woman is almost immune, black man is double fucked.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:32 AM
1

Does the judge believe in casting spells? How does a cretin like that end up presiding over cases? It may just be a figure of speech but he seems to be seriously proposing that it was witchcraft.
/r/PussyPass06/09/14 05:29 AM
7

What a fucking toilet.
/r/PussyPass30/08/14 06:07 AM
0

It is a 'voluntary' arrangement. They are searching for 'appropriate accommodation' for her, a nice little flat perhaps? If she breaks her parole you don't know she will go to prison. Women who break court access orders don't go to prison, and neither will she, probably. I rechecked your references and the first man hasn't even been sentenced yet. Send me some links of women actually being detained for killing their child, and men actually being set free after killing their child. The male kille…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:56 PM
1

So what you are suggesting with your evidence, is that men will not be released 66% of the time if they kill their children, but women will. I can't think why you didn't provide links to cases where female child killers actually got imprisoned. Hint, if a woman kills her child in UK there is a good chance the case will be dealt with by the secret, matriarchal, Family Courts, and so the case will never even be reported.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:57 AM
3

So, male judge frees a female child murderer, female judge imprisons a male car thief. Dat patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:48 AM
4

I am 100% convinced that guys who have blogs like this are trying to get laid. They are the worst kind of duplicitous snake, but you can't entirely blame them for resorting to underhand tactics.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:03 PM
18

'the child molester now has six children, and Judge O'Neill said family circumstances have to be taken into account'
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 09:19 AM
7

Calling the cops in a difficult situation is often the worst thing you can do.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:08 AM
4

This is pure poison. The Guardian is a national newspaper read by loads of social workers, teachers and members of the judiciary.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:26 AM
3

A lot of female animosity towards men has roots in the fact that women find 80% of men physically repulsive. Studies also confirm female/female group bias. Males may be useful providers, but are considered utilities, outsiders. A lot of men are being farmed for their sperm and money, hopelessly entranced by tits.
/r/PussyPass14/05/14 04:41 AM
6

Men systematically receiving longer prison sentences is hardly petty.
/r/PussyPass14/05/14 04:25 AM

Interesting fact in the comments - the Crime Survey of England and Wales CSEW does not include forced to penetrate, even though it is a crime. It is terrifying that without subs like this these outrageous acts of discrimination would remain unknown. What sort of agenda is at work where male victims are denied in a government funded survey? An anti-male agenda.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:48 AM
0

It isn't technically correct. Men face all sorts of discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:47 PM
1

If they are in an abusive relationship or arranged marriage 'tough luck', by your logic.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:18 AM
1

It would be pretty weird if you both had the same doctor and you went to discuss possible fertility treatment and all the time the doctor knows that your partner has had a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:44 AM
1

Yes, and if she had a vasectomy when I wanted kids and I was told I could chose to leave. It has got nothing to do with the tired, boring, predictable, overused, refuge of the stupid, phrase 'her body her choice'. The only person's choice such a policy would enable is the partner who would otherwise waste their life with a dishonest person. Why are you genderising this debate anyway, when it is a situation which applies equally to men and women?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:40 AM
1

Probably not. I suppose there are any number of ways one may be betrayed in a relationship. As long as any policy adopted is consistent and transparent, which is probably hoping for a bit too much.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:30 PM
1

Yes, but sometimes a person is in an unhealthy relationship and doesn't know it because the partner pretends everything is ok, and this would be a pretty bad way to find out, twenty years later.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:29 PM
16

Someone in the article comments suggested that doctors have to get the husband's permission before the wife gets her 'tubes tied', but it seems that the policy differs between doctors, which is ridiculous for such an important thing. I can't actually decide if it is a good idea or not, because if I was married and wanted a child and my wife had a secret vasectomy then I would feel betrayed.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:45 PM
4

Cops can forcibly take a DNA sample in US and UK.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:50 AM
-1

The majority of feminists are normal, because the majority of feminists don't primarily define themselves as such, they are just everyday people who believe that men and women should be as equal as possible.This is a lunatic fringe.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:46 PM
0

Yes, now I think about it there are several prominent female feminists despairing at the direction of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 01:58 PM
3

I don't know why sane feminists don't distance themselves from radical man haters. Maybe they don't feel they are worthy of a response, which isn't really good enough. You have to stand up and be counted. MR's is self policed pretty well, bigotry is not tolerated, importantly, not by censorship, but by peer review.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:45 AM
-8

I don't oppose feminism. Stuff like this article is not feminism. Idiots who spread hatred claim to be feminists, but aren't. I won't allow these imbeciles to make me hate something, they don't have that power over me. True feminism seeks to correct disadvantages that women face. True MR does the same for men. If either movement condones enforcing an inequality, they simply disqualify themselves from the debate.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:13 AM
5

Why are the FBI issuing incomplete definitions containing blatant errors? This is supposed to be the cream of law enforcement and they can't even publish a paper without basic fact checking.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 04:41 AM
13

..and willingly give up a claim on the husband's property?
/r/PussyPass28/03/14 11:44 AM
-4

There are loads of actual disadvantages that men are faced with, without dwelling upon nebulous crap like this.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:13 AM
-1

We shouldn't even be discussing this. Anyone with anything to say about who anyone else finds attractive is an idiot.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:56 AM
-5

Do you have any evidence that any of these things are actually said?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:53 AM
-1

You seem to be getting down voted for saying every one should just accept who others find sexually attractive. U/circuitology is indeed making some bold claims, with no supporting evidence.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:51 AM
1

The only case I know of was in the US.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:37 AM
5

A male on the same charges would definitely have been remanded.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:16 AM
14

Literally every employee in my local council office is a woman. All the bin men and street sweepers are men.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:10 AM
0

If it was some flabby cretin about to blow his dirty beans inside your fifteen year old daughter, I think you would feel differently.
/r/PussyPass18/01/14 09:56 PM
1

Seriously though, people in abusive relationships lose their confidence and normal thought processes and really feel they can't escape. It is a well-known characteristic of such situations. You should not have been hammered with downvotes. You said that you did not understand, after all. Reddit is like that.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:51 PM
1

Everyone is at fault. The teacher should not be having sex with students because it is a power relationship, no excuses. The hypothetical 18 year old should not be fucking the 15 yo. The 15 yo should not be having underage sex, and if it is the law they should be prosectued or the law should be changed. The law needs to decide whether 15 year olds are responsible for their actions, or not, and stop applying it on an ad hoc basis as suits them. As usual, brainless hypocrisy is the order of the da…
/r/PussyPass18/01/14 05:55 PM
6

I don't think this is the time for Yodaisms.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 02:14 PM
2

An 18 year old and a 15 year old smash a window then have sex. Both are prosecuted for smashing the window but only the 18 year old is prosecuted for underage sex. Utter hypocrisy. Surely the 18 year old made them smash the window?
/r/PussyPass09/01/14 05:34 PM
12

Children can either consent, or they can't. It is firmly established in law that they can't, even though they are criminally liable for all other crimes they commit. In this case it is more because of the position of trust, power and influence that a teacher has.
/r/PussyPass09/01/14 05:15 PM
6

Forcible sterilisation is uncommon, as far as I know, and would be a big step in terms of liberty, so care would have to be taken, but I think it is the only option in cases like these. I do have reservations though, because if the justice system failed (surely not!) an innocent person could be sterilised, which would be totally unacceptable. That is why I posed a question.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 01:57 PM
31

Surely if you kill your child you should simply lose the right to produce more children?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:36 AM
0

It really is a cultural thing peculiar to north America and nw Europe, not the whole world.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:58 AM
4

I think it is a woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman to provoke enraged responses. Don't engage with nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 06:57 AM
13

Straw man - does not mention 'oppressed' on the poster, in the title, or any of the comments, except yours. My source shows that serious domestic violence against men takes place, and your stupid comment shows that idiots still think it is a joke (or parody).
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:50 PM
7

Does this sound like a parody? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-21268553
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:24 PM
7

People in abusive relationships often become psychologically intimidated and don't have normal thought processes.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:11 PM
3

That is really divisive. You should be ashamed.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:19 PM
0

The last line is really ambiguous. It could easily be read as saying that men have an easier path to freedom. I don't think the poster intended that, but they should have written more clearly.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:29 AM
3

Do you have any actual evidence?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:24 AM
-1

Objecting to someone saying they want to 'fuck up' feminists and will get 'an erection' while doing so has nothing to do with nihilism, the opposite, in fact. A brainless statement like that can undo thousands of well thought out comments. It is the sort of thing I would expect someone to say if they wanted to damage the perception of men.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:24 PM
-3

Nobody here seems bothered about the Paul Elam quotes? After reading them the rest of the interview was an irrelevance.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:30 AM
2

Most accidents are carelessness, but if you hit a patch of spilled oil then skid and crash that is unavoidable and a true accident.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 01:20 PM
2

I took issue with someone yesterday who was criticising MRAs by falsely portraying women as powerless. They couldn't understand that this misrepresentation, far from strengthening their argument, actually did a disservice to women. You have to wonder at the levels of intelligence and agenda of anyone grasping at straws to nurture a victim culture.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 09:42 AM
4

Getting a test is nothing to do with not being scared of your wife, it is about avoiding turning home life into a battleground by effectively half accusing your wife of cheating. If you think any woman would take it well, you are mistaken. I can't think of anything that would annoy a woman more.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 08:08 PM
3

You still don't get what I mean. If every woman knows birth involves a paternity test not as many of them will fuck around. Doing it on an ad hoc basis after the child is born is pointless. Mandatory means men and children are protected without having to destroy the trust in a relationship. Furthermore, a woman would have to consent to any medical procedure carried out on the child, and many would not consent.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:41 PM
3

Asking your hormonal post natal wife for a paternity is just not an option. A guy raising kids that he wrongly thinks are his is not a good thing for anyone, including the kids. Knowing a mandatory test is due would undoubtedly mean it would happen less, and if a bad thing happens less then that is a good thing.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:28 PM
8

If it was mandatory fewer women would dupe men into raising someone else's offspring. It would mean fewer solid dependable guys were taken for a ride. Doubly insulting if they end up divorced and have to keep paying. Theoretically, the ex wife could even shack up with the biological father she had the fling with and keep collecting the money. Some guy, somewhere must be in that situation, paying for and hardly getting to see kids that he thinks are his. Just imagine.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter