TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aryaman16 Archive

View 5 posts and 159 comments by aryaman16 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They do. They consider prn wrong, thats literally the reason for shaming them. Thats why there is a huge No Fap thing going on among youth, there is good uproar against Prn in conservative circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:59 PM
0

How about you tell those OF women to mind their own business and just not tell the public that they do OF???? Also, why does term "male gaze" exists? There was some popular sports guy who accidentally liked an Insta pic of some actress and was trolled so much for it, he had to clarify that he clicked like button accidentally. There is ton of stigma against men doing even slight sexual recreational stuff. We are just propagating it and shaming Sexual content producers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:33 PM
1

No lol, you can't restrict respect to yourself. If you consider prn wrong, and shame me for it, I am just following you by shaming them. You are being hypocrite here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 01:25 PM
5

If I face shame for watching p*rn, and I am watching it accepting it as wrong, I can shame them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 04:39 PM
2

Most watch p*rn in hiding, a word of it won't come out of my mouth if its any time other than night and place other than my room with no one in it. Accepting it as wrong, and that I am doing some wrong thing, in hiding. As I have seen before, if someone has any p*rny stuff on his profile on reddit and people find out on any unrelated SFW thread, they often get called out and dismissed for any argument. P*rn carries a shame with it. So, its only natural that they would shame OF models too, when o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 04:26 PM
2

Men and women still have some inherent differences, and they have differences in sexuality too. Men watch and enjoy lot more prn than women, and thats fine. Also, that can lead to differences in what kind of crimes they commit. Instead of taking one gender as inherently criminal, we can just accept and rather focus on reducing it.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 09:41 PM
7

I used to moderate a p*rn sub and a prn discord server, There was nothing to remove other than Spam, onlyfans links.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 09:28 PM
4

But are you even recognizing anti-men forums? What fraction of misandry is recognized, is called out and also gets popular so that people can get aware? I don't want to compare them, cuz there are too many factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:15 PM
9

"It’s primarily men" Men can be misandrists too. And I doubt you are putting the full picture about what those feminist groups are doing. Them spending whole year talking about "girl victims", "women victims", "violence on women", "boys need to be taught consent". Then turning to "men can be victims of sexual violence too", in the last week. Doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:06 PM

Damn, got a reply to give to such comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 05:52 PM

Sexual attraction being interpreted as "thought of interchangeable fleshlight" is dehumanizing too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:37 PM
1

You should not be taking the "nice"/"bad" to their literal meaning. First of all, society at a wide level does this division, for everyone, an office going man in formal clothes, who isn't rude and overall good, is called "nice" and the guys usually breaking rules, loud, rude are called "bad". It isn't supposed to put you at top of the moral ladder in every holistic way, just a little division. You will feel it too. Also, when using in dating context, it becomes a puritanic thing. "players" do a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:48 PM
1

No, they aren't using your definition. what they refer to nice when calling themselves or a group of people nice, is the broader basic good only compared to the "bad guy". That usual social division of "bad person" and "good person". They don't mean someone holistically top of morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:24 PM
7

As I said, I have platonic friends. And what you said is a different topic itself. If not sex, does she even view me as something different from "platonic"? If yes, then there is no question of "loneliness", cuz that solves the major thing why bitch about "loneliness". If we meet, we flirt, sext and stuff.... then whatever happens, I won't complain of "loneliness".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:53 PM
15

Sex is a big part of romantic emotional connection. If the sex issue is just with her, she can't have it with anyone, I am completely fine. If she did, she can have that emotional connection with that guy and not with me? She better be with him then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:17 PM
7

You mean an asexual relationship? There is a lot to uncover here? I am talking about romance, emotions and intimacy. Those are what I want. And sex is a big thing emotionally for me. If she for some reason, can't have sex, despite sharing that intimacy, emotions, thats fine. Did she behave exact same way with her past relationships? (this would answer everything) Cuz if its just with her, she just can't, Then no problem. Or if its me, and she did share that level of emotional connection, for sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 06:09 PM
7

Did she have sex with others?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:37 PM
13

That's not low standards, what you described is a platonic friendship, I have platonic friends. We aren't here to discuss platonic friendships???
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:37 PM
1

If he is your friend now, only effort he can possibly do for you are those above things, what extra you want him to do? What about women who immediately understand the other guys' intention and are ready to flirt or stuff like that, what effort they did?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 05:24 AM
3

Having your first date and GF at 25 is no different from having none. Good dating life means good throughout. So, does your fat guy have had good social history before current GF? My point is, what you are saying is good, but that anecdote is 'dismissal'.
/r/seduction11/05/26 05:05 PM
2

Also, in conservative societies, puritanical views are held for men too, it doesn't have to be limited to the question of "body count" only. Like, there is massive stigma against men "approaching" women, men expressing anything sexual, etc. A popular sportsman of my country liked a pic by an actress on insta, people trolled him like crazy until he removed it. Also, I frequent dating advice subs, the stuff they tell people to do, the stuff that men do in hollywood movies, western men when they me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 04:30 PM
15

It demonizes lonely men. And when I say that anywhere, they come at me saying, "oh it doesn't mean lonely men, it means men who hate women cuz of that...", then why they don't just use "misogyny"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:05 AM
5

You showed no proof. Also, you and parent guy are talking about different things ig, he never said that being the nastiest doesn't affect getting into relationships. He is saying that men with most social skills, humble, respectful etc are also single. If being nasty was the reason, men complaining about friendzoning would be way less. Also, many nasty men get into relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:54 PM
9

"Why is social and societal contact reduced to fucking?" He didn't say that. Guys who have good "connection" aren't able to have sex, thats what he is saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:29 PM
6

He is just contradicting; how do you deduce this from that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:15 PM
12

Also, they lack critical thinking and ability to differentiate between groups of people or separate two concepts (idk the exact term for that). When we talk about misandry and inability to empathize with male victims, it encompasses whole society and men along with women, are the part of the society too. So, why they have to cherry pick men misandrists from the whole lot and start an "Other men only...." argument? That itself is misandric.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 12:55 PM
7

Most men don't have those fears cuz most news of men getting killed/robbed/assaulted isn't broadcasted as much and has been trivialized.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 03:50 PM

Stop using the term red pill like its an organization or some kind of group or centralized ideology. Many people are on a spectrum between BP and RP, based upon their experiences. Outside of the US, many countries aren't even familiar with RP, but their many men's dating overview still aligns those of RP. Stuff like, "girls only go for extremely top tier men", "height matters a lot", "I can only improve after earning" is a broadly held believe among many men those who don't subscribe to any ideo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 02:52 PM
1

"nice guy" thing isn't supposed to be taken literally. "Nice" has a broader meaning, but mostly those guys who try to restrict to more socially acceptable things with regards to sexuality or be "puritan".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 11:41 PM
1

"only for commitment" that is the drawback. "women's sexual peak", lets avoid all this fancy biology here. Its an emotional thing, considering all the stuff that RP describes about Non top men's experiences as true. And the thought, that she behaves same way with me, and few years ago, I would have been non-existent to her, it hurts a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 05:49 PM
5

"South Asian"
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/25 04:23 PM
1

Its no different than sl*t shaming
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:40 AM
1

"there are men who" Those men who are just for sex, have multiple such friends at a time and have no such emotional connection, so they would vanish a soon as they get to know that you are not gonna go down. People who lash out, belong to the ones, OP is mentioning about.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:35 AM
0

"decent" as in, OP's competitor, like, decent in looks etc, for whom you would ghost OP on the app while chatting. "I have options, sure" So, stop disregarding OP's point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:19 PM
0

You are the one making up assumption. Its about "options", not "amazing options". What makes you think that Guys who rarely get matches, their 1 match in a week would be "amazing"? The complains aren't about amazing options or life partners, its about the fundamental thing, that is finding one. So, yeah, you have that problem solved which men complain about. Its like, Women live in a shitty urban area filled with pollution, so no scenery to view, While, Men are "blind". Not similar at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:53 PM
2

Maybe we all need to learn about abstractions or different POVs. Men don't complain about women's preferences; they complain about the Vast difference in experiences of those with certain quality and another with certain quality, which kind off becomes like a hierarchy, and manifests in almost every kind of experience. Whatever preference you have, Everyone wants just their sexual lives to be just good enough and they won't care to complain. Yeah, you are a picky eater, but I am also free to com…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:15 PM
13

If we are allowed to talk against DEI quotas and hiring based on that: This year, our batch (B.Tech or B.E) at my university saw campus placements (A system, where during the final year, companies come to university campuses for hiring freshers and hire through university integrated programs, in India). And Most of the Big-name companies: Dell, philips, nvidia etc, (my college is kinda low tier in India, so faang mostly don't come), Hired only women. Also, above 15 LPA CTC (salary) mostly women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/25 06:45 PM
-3

'Partnered' doesn't mean good dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 11:09 AM
10

Mesosphere lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 08:44 PM
1

No, since he used the keyword "conservative", I would like to bring in the topic of "sexual demonization" and "puritanism" here. When your conservative close men are acting defensive regarding other men, Its not just about SA, what they consider "adjacent to SA", is also normal Sexual acts, they also consider being hit on or approached or flirting as predatory thing. They probably also see hooking up, or anything casual as "their women" got "used". Many men don't want their partners to be alone …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 04:32 PM
6

They do They also read whatever Left and feminism has to say about men's dating life, so many of them just blame it on themselves or decrease their ambitions and date only for settling or leave any kind of non-platonic interactions altogether.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/25 08:29 AM
1

Its just the lingo and analogy they do not want to use or find cringey, many of the Blue Pillers and people who don't know anything about RP or BlackP, do fall adjacent to them, they just don't realize it. Idk how many Men I have met in life, who had no dating life, and when asked, they just laughed it off saying "look at my face bruh".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 04:06 PM
7

Its used as a way of sexual demonization. In my country, there have been a list of Male Sport Players being popularized as "national crushes" due to their hot/cute looks. Recently, in some kind of podcast, some guy mentioned how cute a certain Woman Sport player was, now there are posts on reddit attacking him for, yk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 07:19 AM
3

You can sell a book, set up a speed dating event, develop a dating app, sell a dating course etc, You will see a ton of men swarming there within short time. And most of them would be having non-existent dating life. They do are trying to do everything in their knowledge to improve. I live in a part of world where piracy is common, online goods are not considered real so people always hesitate before paying for any online thing. Still dating subscriptions sell like anything, scams on dating apps…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:09 AM
1

See the quotes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:35 AM
2

"Just be social" "oh you are? Then you will find one 👍👍👍after a yr, 5yrs, decade, but you will..."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:40 PM
6

I support equal rights for everyone, but I wouldn't call myself a feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:53 PM
9

I am not that positive, I doubt they would still judge everything from non-Male lenses and ignore anything thats not straight up, "k1ll all men".
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 04:47 PM
8

"I love apples" "Why the hell you hate oranges so much?"
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 01:33 PM
6

Yeah, also if OP meets us in real life, he is gonna include us his "average" and presume that we have a good dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:02 PM
1

"aforementioned aspects of life" No, we only complain about dating aspect of life. Rest of the things: socially inept, no social circle, no hobbies, chronically lonely etc are attributed by blue pillers on finding anyone complaining about dating, not us. Most of us are average in every other way: hobbies, a small no. of good friends etc, but shitty dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:40 PM
18

"Average men are the ones you see at your work and school and your friends." Yes and many of them have a bad dating life too. OP created a bad strawman, also most of the description: Socially bad, no hobbies, extremely lonely, no hobbies, desperate for sex etc, all these are attributed by the BLUE pill people, Not us.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:22 PM
8

This sub has only 20K weekly visitors. We need to expand our message first, most people even those who empathize with men, don't understand anything beyond false accusations, loneliness etc as men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:26 AM
1

What even is his argument except saying i-word again and again?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/25 06:12 PM
2

Regarding that "whore" comment, women too call men pervert, creep, in*el etc for watching such content, while they themselves make such content or defend others.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/25 02:18 PM
2

They are a fractional minority and usually don't discuss such things online. The parent comment is talking about in general all the men who are facing problems in dating. Most of the people whom you call in*el on mainstream SM, their 'women hate' starts from "women only date attractive men" and end at "nice guys - bad guys" thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:56 AM
1

I do not support "highing up" the standards, just to 'show them'. Another thing, which worries me is how society as a whole reacts to anything involving men + sexuality, considering it "predatory" by default: How they always reduce everything to, "You are not entitled to women....", no, nobody was talking in that sense. A group of people not having any social life and friends, isn't normal, and that problem being widespread, we as a society should give a bit of attention to it, this doesn't mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:53 PM

I have seen many women posting on SM, about how 25+ men who never dated are red flags, cuz how is that possible. There was a woman on some women specific sub, she was asking whether (the guy she just started dating), is an in*el and women hater, since he was 27 and had never dated and blamed it on looks, and since looks don't matter, only personality does. Bruh, I doubt even men understand. They do understand their POV, but not the women's.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:18 PM
15

Its generalization, they take us as monoliths. They assume, we all men have some secret communication channel on discord maybe, if they blame "men" hard enough, then we would send a message in our channel to not commit crimes, every guy will listen as a man and stop.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/25 04:46 AM
1

As I mentioned, I am not socially inept (maybe I am, you don't know me tho). BUT, I am sure for my friends, they are pretty extrovert. And I mentioned their dating lives too, which is similar to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 07:14 PM
3

Nope, maybe widen your lenses. I am an average guy, currently in a University (prime time and env for dating), Maybe, I am too socially inept, spend my time online all the time etc. BUT, I do have friends, who are avg and above average too, don't even know about reddit, extremely social, attend every event out there (completely opposite of in*el stereotypes thrown around here) And most of them are single (without dating history). Some of them don't even understand dating, casual stuff etc in pra…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:21 AM
1

I browsed some DEI related posts on mainstream subreddits. And most people aren't even aware (or they don't want to be) that such things are happening, when told, their reply is always: They tell the full form of DEI, i.e. if it stands for that, it can't discriminate. DEI is for eliminating biases...... (straightaway ignoring someone's experiences). Gaslighting: Another unemployed man blaming women.... DEI just to bring more Women candidates to the interview, rest the process is same. DEI is not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/25 06:09 PM
6

How sneakily, they tweaked the data. Its that 99% (or something near it) of Murderers or R*pists are men, not the 99% of men are that, this just completely changes the whole dynamics.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/25 05:34 PM
9

I didn't want to reply in Main thread. Read "friendzone" as "platonic-zone", this will solve all your doubts. You are just taking it literally, "Just don't be friends brooo", bruh there is deeper meaning to it, which aligns more with word "platonic-zone". And friendship didn't end, "friends" can be sexual partners. "ONLY wants to be her sexual partner" sounds so puritan.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 09:54 PM
5

These people almost feel like a psyop, giving content to people who are against any kind of men movements.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:45 AM
22

Lol, thats what I believe is the biggest reason behind poor dating life of men.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 10:38 PM
74

I wonder why do we even have to discuss this? and prove that this is sexist? Like if it was some another group: "Sometimes I dream a society without bla......[deleted by admins]"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:39 AM
28

What I notice across Reddit and other SM is, "incel" is any guy who complains about a dating problem and doesn't exclusively blame himself. No, not just dating problem, any problem that men face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 12:55 PM
2

I am gonna put up a different view to this issue. The problem is actually, demonization of male sexuality.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:53 PM
6

Hasn't poland always been conservative, like I have heard so many times about their anti migrant stance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 09:49 AM
4

Also, they don't think beyond basic legal rights. And when they are told about any problem: "Its due to men only/patriarchy only", "women have their own problems (equivalent to it)", "who set up the system", "be a man/its your job".
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:45 PM
2

Here people who are pointing out this, are being bashed for "running an agenda of Mens Rights over an attack on nation", bruh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 05:01 AM
1

Isn't "approaching" itself a way of asking for consent? Or how do you ask for consent for approaching?
/r/seduction09/03/25 09:19 PM
13

How tf someone reaches to that conclusion after reading the first point? This is generic do's don't's stuff, people connecting it to Andrew tate? going personal on OOP? They are filled with male hatred.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/25 02:35 PM
9

When we complain about feminism not raising men's issues, they ask us to do it on our own and when we do, we are copying?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 11:13 AM
0

People (non feminist men too) accept the idea of patriarchy being truth and reason behind most gender norms and thus accept any kind of theory connecting it to other things too. How do we argue against them, denying patriarchy in any way makes us look like fools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:42 AM
11

This is on leftists to consider everyone against DEI as being racist or sexist without listening their actual position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:27 PM
15

Such mental gymnastics, just to hate?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 05:17 PM
-3

I wouldn't call that misandry, I know that subreddit and I think we should give its posters some slack, they might have any kind of background and due to the stuff they are suffering they could write anything.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/24 03:59 PM
8

72 men in 50 KM radius? Does she realize how big is that? 50KM radius means area of 7854 square km, Since she lives in London, that means 5640 people per square km. And approx, 2820 men per square km, So, around 22 million men in 50 Km radius, and 72 out of them is, so small.... that it would be 0.0003 percent.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/24 12:11 PM
40

Yeah, be wary of all men, there is no problem in taking measures for your safety. But problem is hating them, you can be wary of people without hating them.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/24 12:29 AM
7

India is very unsafe, though I advocate for men, I won't deny women's experiences.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:50 PM
35

No, those fb posts were not just "weird", a mom chose a "natural clinic" or whatever they are called over normal clinics, because normal ones do it with anesthesia, and natural ones do it without it (the good old way) and she wanted to hear her sons' screams. In another post, a nurse mentions that she loves her job because she loves to see boys tied and helpless and screaming. Etc. i.e. Fetishizing their agony. These people shouldn't be around any children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 06:40 PM
27

Yeah, banning does nothing. Many posts (I made the mistake of going through the sub) are screenshots of quite old facebook comments. I doubt a reddit ban would affect them even a bit. They need to be traced, if not legal action, their sons need to be informed of such posts by their moms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 03:50 PM
11

Ban is good but it scares me so much to think that people like that exist irl and moms' comments they used to post were real. Were they real comments, can we do anything against those moms?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 04:41 AM
66

How people always forget to consider individuality and see whole group as one? Getting taste of their own medicine? Bruh, I was born in 2000s. And I am nowhere powerful enough to affect how society is functioning and its rules. Women have been facing such since millenia? Women who live today are different, women who lived few generations ago were different individuals with different experiences. "Facing since a millenia..." means nothing.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 02:11 PM
30

Trump win just took off their mask.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 06:23 PM
5

This is just fgtow
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 05:25 AM
23

He only used "children" here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 09:21 AM
13

I agree, but I would really want to know about what did he mean by "birthright"?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 08:22 AM
2

You don't even need to go to such small youtube channels to find such things. Just go to any popular subreddit. So many posts filled with such entitlement, arrogance etc, telling how american men, white ppl, latino people etc were fools or something. They don't want women to progress, they would choose nazis over women, how kamala/dems are oppressed. As if it was their "duty" to vote for you. "You helped trump get elected", yeah? Coz, I preferred him? If you see it, it looks sooo similar to "Nic…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 06:05 AM
24

Sure, but you didn't get what I am saying. Problem isn't: "Guy: I want to have sex with her today, what do I do? If I ask, she would find it creepy" Problem is: "Guy: I must not try to be sexual, its wrong, I am not a creep" That is, guys actively try to bury their sexual feelings, because they consider it wrong.
/r/seduction16/09/24 05:37 AM
2

Yeah, women love casual sex. But, our conservative society (or its remnants), which include both men and women, perpetuate the narrative that "men love casual sex, and no responsibilities" and "women are victim to men who only want sex". Just in different ways. Men and women both are demonized for their sexuality. Society doesn't want women to get "used" and also doesn't want men to be that demon that "uses" her. Women spread the narrative that "men only want sex", "they see women as only sex ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:05 PM
0

Its not just about having sex, its about having sex then leaving her (while she was expecting more). Sex is not a "loss" for her, sex without relationship that she expected is a "loss" for her. Also, women too consider "cumming and dumping" as degrading, thats how men got to know this in the first place. Do women see sex as degrading?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 05:48 PM
74

People do this because they think that would be creepy/pervert-ish.
/r/seduction15/09/24 05:03 PM
45

"not all men" isn't about trusting. Its to control the hatred. You can always be wary of strangers without hating them.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 08:40 AM
4

Thing is, he (to whom the girl in the post replied) never said "girls shouldn't do makeup", he just said that girls look better without makeup. The point was never about arguing over benefits of makeup or bad sides of makeup. The replier (in the post) assumes that he is forcing his believes, which isn't the case. This post isn't arguing in favor of makeup or against it, it is pointing out that the assumption of "women look better without makeup" as sexist, ignorant, forcing your unrealistic beau…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/08/24 04:39 PM
25

She gatekeeping what...
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 05:29 PM
1

Ok, now, how to do all this...
/r/seduction25/08/24 04:47 PM
3

You are in your best time, approach. First try by just approaching without any sexual intent, for complimenting, asking address etc.
/r/seduction13/08/24 07:52 AM
7

US is valuing their women more than other countries do, doesn't mean US is valuing their women over their men. It is also very likely that other potential competitors are valuing their women very less and US is just doing what should be fair.... Its tells nothing unless we compare men and women directly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 06:02 PM
12

Regarding your Olympic medals fact, women are competing with other countries' women only, so if US women are winning more medals, it means other countries' women are winning less, so its just it. Rest I agree...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/24 05:39 PM
1

See, this is not the way, being complete platonic friends with someone for 2yrs, and then expressing your feelings. You need to show your feelings quickly, I don't mean "confession" (saying ILU and all that), just showing your feelings: flirting, spending mutual time and all that. Just so she has an idea that you like her. And escalate. But its past that, so from now, follow other top comments, and you are just 16, there are more girls, you don't need to be invested into 1 unless its exclusive.
/r/seduction10/08/24 03:19 PM
54

Insulting a guy like him is fine, but using the phrases like that shows that you believe in the the stereotypes that, "small pp is less masculine or inferior or the guy is a loser because of it", also indirectly shames other people suffering due to such insults.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/24 10:02 AM
21

Yeah, but shaming about penis size is most of the times about shaming the masculinity of a man. Holding men to some irrational standards, so that he can qualify to call himself a man, is misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/08/24 09:59 AM
1

Bhai ye sab delhi mei? Mujhe to darr lagta hai. But anyways, ye sab common ho jaye toh ho sakta hai aane waali generation ka stigma km lge...
/r/seduction09/08/24 06:30 PM
1

Shitty joke
/r/seduction26/07/24 12:23 PM

Naaah, women are as capable to logical thinking as men. And empathy is required in politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:17 AM
-3

"examole" Damn, dating evolving so fast, you guys making new terms every day. Gotta check urban dictionary now...
/r/seduction26/07/24 06:00 AM
3

For making it legal/illegal, extend it to marriage: before marriage, there should be a set of things chosen by law to be disclosed to the other person. I don't think govt should be interfering other than that in dating.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/24 02:52 AM
2

I have seen news of some men killing other men for serving them wrong food. Men are also the victim of entitlement. Also, why not use "some men" in starting of the tweet itself or better word, "people".
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/24 01:49 PM
8

You can use the different group of people also: Would you say, "earth would be ........... without black population"? This is more effective, since feminists heavily criticize "reverse the gender..." arguments and would take you for a sexist if you make one.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/24 06:36 AM
2

He is just speculating whether that woman really wanted to take things further or not? I mean, when trying to guess whether other person is "using" you, you can't really know what exactly was going on in the 2nd person's mind, you can just speculate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:19 PM
8

A lot of stereotypes which harm men come from patriarchy, but patriarchy has become a term to villainise men and hold them responsible for everything. Any conversation regarding men problems with any feminist person leds to inevitable, "its all your fault". I have just started calling it "society" or "societal norms" to not throw responsibility at any specific group.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 09:46 AM
2

Slide 1: "Kinda asking for it": Yeah, many people who get robbed get blamed themselves, why were you wearing this? Why were your phone in your hand? Why were you out at night? Comments are real and often.There are many people who don't trust."Not all women rob people": Yeah I would agree to this, but the thing is, nobody tries to make "robbing" a woman or man specific thing or villainise men. While any discussion of women getting harassed is never devoid of villainising men "men are trash/creeps…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/24 02:35 PM
15

Most of the approaches are by men only, and they get rejected most of the times, if he was true, half of the young women would vanish.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/24 06:57 AM
6

No, the conversation mentioned in the post isn't about that, the premise is different, its about this: Many women react strongly when approached, they consider it aggressive and creepy behaviour, eg: "Calling a guy creep when approached", "Reporting to HR when some colleague tries to flirt" etc. The first comment is talking about that, why consider it an unsafe thing when approached? Just say no and move on. So, the reply to him (supporting women), is that, why don't men learn to not kill when r…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/24 06:53 AM
39

Yeah, so many men I see peddling "Not all men but always a man" bs. Also, "I never experienced such a thing", as if only their experiences are true, seen so many times when discussing similar issue as you are mentioning. There are more, "why do you want to be friendly with somebody else's child?", "Just don't be creepy" etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/24 05:17 PM
13

Thats a fetish subreddit, most of them are men, who go there at night (or whenever they want), wank and then back to normal reddit.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/24 03:33 PM
72

MensLib is not really a male advocacy sub, more of a "lets help men become civilized/how can men do better for society" kind of sub. The post tries so hard to make it look like they are worried about men facing violence. But actually emphasizes "from other men" so much that it at the end is just villainizing men. Real male advocacy sub would focus more on helping victim men than villainizing men.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/24 09:34 PM
4

gende roles exist for men, under patriarchy. So, misandry also exists and is systemic.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/24 03:13 PM
5

Liberals always assign a oppressor-oppressed dichotomy to men and women, and think about every gender issue revolving around it. Thus the belief that men are oppressors, so misandry isn't real or men are to be blamed for it.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/24 04:49 AM
3

See, gender roles and stereotypes were assigned to both genders, so misandry too (just like misogyny) is systemic.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:48 AM
26

No point in arguing with them, just downvote and move on
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/24 04:44 PM
6

No problem. I believe misogyny is rampant in male advocacy only because it lacks leftists, progressives, women like you, etc. Being exclusively dominated by RWs make it looks just reactionary.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/24 02:24 PM
29

Mansplaining feels like a sexist term.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/24 04:39 PM
34

Maybe just stop genderifying and feeling victim, someone explaining something to you and you don't want to hear? yeah, maybe they are being annoying, don't make an issue out of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/24 08:19 PM
47

Yeah, why does everything look like oppression to them. What about sex toys that women use? Would she apply the same logic to them?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/24 09:09 AM
5

People see it as opposite things, or fight of some kind. You can do the following: Go to any reddit post discussing a news related to domestic violence, where perpetrator is a man. Make a comment, without any agenda tone, mention "I know a guy who was beaten by his gf". You would be bombarded with, "why are you derailing", "its not comparable with the news in the post", "but women have it worse", "I support you but make a different thread for it" etc. You wouldn't get those comments, if you had …
/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:01 AM
-9

Every women might have faced it or not, but as long as he is not trying to compare with men problems and writing on the lines of "Women face these things, now shut up", it isn't misandry ig.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/24 02:04 PM
21

sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:57 PM
66

I am such an in*el, can't get tired of misogyning women 🥱
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:44 PM
1

How is this misandry?
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/24 07:45 PM
117

People wouldn't turn into in*els if they show some empathy towards them when they were in their "I got rejected for my height" phase. Friendly behaviour would encourage positivity and them lowering their anxiety. I saw a comment from a redditor "these in*els shit their pants while talking to a real person and want a gf", I was like bruh, people like you are the reason they are like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/24 07:13 AM
2

And the "predator" word also has that disgusting animalistic undertone that people hate about "female".
/r/EverydayMisandry22/02/24 02:20 PM
5

Yeah, there was a comment from a guy, about how his sister had become too conscious regarding her looks, after her bf left her (probably due to looks), AND he was expressing his anger on men, for her sisters' situation. If it was a guy, he would probably be bashing him for being in*el for focusing on looks so much.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:10 PM
65

Great, you don't have to "worship" us tho
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:51 PM
37

Also, try to figure out the amount of men being victim to violent crimes, except rapes, men account for most of the victims too. 90%+ of perpetrators being men doesn't mean, 90%+ of men are committing those crimes. You can say 100% of crimes are committed by humans and just be afraid of every other person.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/24 06:56 PM
1

I already wrote, you are free to leave her.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:25 PM
7

You do not understand. There is no question of what "you want". You do not decide what the other person does, your partner is not your child. But yeah, you are free to leave them if you don't trust them.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:06 PM
1

Problem with this post is the way OP is expressing his opinions. His problem is not with women being friends with men while being in a relation. Its with insecurity that his partner might be seeing other men and their men friends might hit on them and she would leave. He is using conservatism to channel his frustration, which leds to liberals beleiving that OP is sexist or something. Maybe, he should just have expressed his frustration directly, which would have been received better (I have seen…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:01 PM
10

Thats a given with breakups, if you doubt someone had different intentions and wanted to be with you for selfish reasons and not really love, you can do nothing about it.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 07:07 AM
18

Writing "as a woman" allows you to get that "victim" treatment, on reddit and other progressive spaces, opinions from women are given more importance than men. I know you weren't trying to do any such thing, and his comment sounds too aggressive, he just meant don't mention your gender. MRA isn't men only, women are always welcome.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:46 PM
23

Women do use bro many times during the convo without really meaning it, due to the feel. See if they are using it multiple times and during starting of a sentence.
/r/seduction10/02/24 03:19 PM
4

Yeah, you were not doing "but what about", you were just adding to it. Why can't both gender issues be discussed together at one place, in one thread, in one comment? Why they always have to make it men vs women, if you start discussing men issues then it means you hate women? And I have seen countless times, same "but what about" happening when things are opposite. And they are upvoted, reason being, men issues can't be discussed without discussing women issues, coz they are connected. Eventual…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:38 PM
17

No, you are not a misogynist if you hadn't bothered her for her past if she wasn't your GF, you do respect their rights. And if you would judge the men who engage into such stuff on omegle the same way. She should try to understand your feelings and why it happens in men in general. People just pass it off as "men are trying to objectify you" or "insecurity".
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:19 PM
0

They just find it hard to trust men, bf has passed her trust checks, so she can trust.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:26 PM
4

Not toxic femininity, it would just make us look like trolls or misogynists.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:21 AM
27

If you force a certain behavior upon someone based upon their sex, it is sexist, 'Toxic masculinity' should be called as misandry or internalized misandry when men do it.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:17 AM
21

If a woman wants abortion, she should be allowed, no matter what the father says, because of how physically demanding it is for women, the whole pregnancy. Men should be allowed to paper abort tho, like if there is a legal period of certain weeks for abortion, man have to give it in written that he doesn't want the child to the woman (4 weeks earlier than the abortion period ends). Then even if the child is born, you don't have any legal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 01:00 PM
18

Self esteem Women interaction on day to day daily lives Things which led to decrease in above in a boy's life from childhood are bullying, loneliness etc. Something needs to be done about those. You are far more likely to find men who have become chronic internet users (discord, reddit etc), whose social life is non existent, have social anxiety, than women.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:57 PM
5

Another thing is, even when they discuss men's mental health and suicides, they ignore every other men specific issue which led to their suicide and club everything under 'men's mental health'.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:34 PM
18

People always see Sexism as similar to other kind of discriminations like Racial (whites always dominated the colored), religious (dominant religion of the country always dominated the minority), etc. They need to understand that sexism is different, its transactional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 07:17 PM
2

But low standards on individual case basis hurts no one, the girl gets to date easily and guy is happy too. Problem is high standards.
/r/seduction12/12/23 05:33 PM
32

People have a wrong conception that sex deprived men rape for sex: Rape is mostly done to assert dominance (the way we talk about sex: "the guy f**ks the girl", the guy is shown as dominant, so there is a dominance thing associated with it).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 02:52 PM
8

Depressing...
/r/seduction16/10/23 05:57 AM
1

But he should need to tell the mother in written before the abortion period ends
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 02:12 PM
5

For whatever reason, if you are currently taking care of a child, you shouldn't neglect it, you should follow a proper legal procedure. Eg: If parents leave a child at some paid babysitter, and don't come to take it, and paid babysitter's duration ends (for whatever time he was paid for taking care of the child), he can't just leave the child and abandon it.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 02:54 AM
1

Bit irrelevant to your post, but We all in this sub are feminists.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 09:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter