TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

as_ewe_wish Archive

View 0 posts and 235 comments by as_ewe_wish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Perhaps idealising women out of contention is an issue here. Partners will disappoint us. It's too be expected, and it can be dealt with peacefully and forgiveness can occur and relationships continue - even stronger if you're managing things the right way. You're meant to keep on learning when you're in a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 12:00 PM
1

Your argument is compelling.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 11:23 PM
37

It's a huge problem for minors - in real life and online. Really fucking disgusting behaviour.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:19 PM
1

Insults are no substitute for rational discussion.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 05:39 AM
1

Lol that was a month ago. Have you been seething about this the whole time? You've written that I misrepresent your words right before launching into a supposed conversation between us - one that you've entirely invented. Is that rational?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 02:57 AM
14

Just say you're looking for a feminist, like her sister, who'll pay half of everything.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:42 AM
-7

Billie Piper has two sons.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:21 PM
2

Agreed!
/r/MensRights02/10/24 06:24 AM
4

A very small number of people suffer from an overly tight foreskin. In 90% of those cases that can be fixed with steroidal cream, and the tiny remainder with minor surgery.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 12:50 PM
2

The benefits in females isn’t much compared to circumcised men (very considerable decrease in STI…) It's scary to ask if you think there's benefits to FGM, but I'm asking you what you think anyway.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 12:47 PM
1

Until next time, goodbye.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:08 PM
1

I guess if you keep commenting you do.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 11:48 AM
1

'Classy' is not a compliment in this context. I'm sorry the women in your life feel that way about you. I guess they have their reasons.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 11:23 AM
1

Editing comments without notation. As if Jared Kushner isn't a real person. Classy.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:55 AM
1

Then instead of shifting the goalposts again why not respond properly to this... Do men gossip? Yes. They even have a name for it in the navy called scuttlebutt - long established before women were allowed to serve. Do men shame? Yes. It's been used eternally by men in religious orders and to call women 'sluts'. That's where the term 'slut shaming' comes from. Do men ridicule? All the time. From sports rivalry to homophobia to anti-feminist slurs. Do men psychologise? Yes. The field of psycholog…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:53 AM
1

'Hypergamous 'is not a gendered term. hypergamy (noun) The practice of marrying into an equal or more prestigious social group or caste. Act or practice of seeking a spouse of higher socioeconomic status, or caste status than oneself. See Jared Kushner.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 10:16 AM
1

Do men gossip? Yes. They even have a name for it in the navy called scuttlebutt - long established before women were allowed to serve. Do men shame? Yes. It's been used eternally by men in religious orders and to call women 'sluts'. That's where the term 'slut shaming' comes from. Do men ridicule? All the time. From sports rivalry to homophobia to anti-feminist slurs. Do men psychologise? Yes. The field of psychological analysis has been dominated by men until only recently. Howard Teten and Pat…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 09:42 AM
1

Funny... (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, (R)eputation destruction. and solving for (F)ace or consent ... are all things men do. A self own if ever there was one.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 09:03 AM
1

I'm sure you have better things to do than being proven wrong again and again. Running away is a convenient method to shed accountability when you've done things like misrepresented the work of people you've referenced such Cummings and the previously linked studies. Whatever floats your boat I guess and helps to sleep at night. If that's the subjugation of women and eternal victimhood then it's a sad way to exist.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 08:11 AM
1

From your other comment... Essentially: you're either in support of female dominance and mismanagement, or you're not. If you haven't noticed it's still men dominating positions of power in politics, finance, and in company boardrooms. Highlighting 'female mismanagement' while ignoring good female management or male mismanagement is just misogyny and it shows your thought processes are compromised by bias. I'm sorry if you're unfamiliar with competitive environments, which is what we're in cultu…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 07:43 AM
0

As if men are not sociopathic and women are not altruistic. As if men don't have intrinsic conscious and subconscious biases. Male supremacism like you expressed is a heavily biased way of thinking and does not help the men's movement at all. Intellectually it's a dead end street.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:09 PM
0

Again, shutting down the conversation when a simple question is asked - one that shows that you invent strawman arguments, shift goalposts, and assign unfounded motivations to people that disagree with you as a tactic to 'win' a debate. Now you've moved on to saying women look out other women while ignoring the complementary finding that says men don't look out for other men. A strange omission given this is primarily a men's forum. The other cited essay suggests that men defer to women, but if …
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:02 PM
-1

Bullies in juries are not uncommon and that fact doesn't mean there's a strong correlation with gender or race. I agreed that female pedophiles are not uncommon. They commit lower-level abuse against men in similar numbers to the other way around. The commit acts of extreme violence but at a rate which is dwarfed by that of men. Where are you getting the idea that I'm on a moral high horse or that I think 'female nature' is all sweetness and light?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:46 PM
-2

I can see you're wanting to move away from what you said about male supremacism-led Islam being 'better' at controlling women. Is the passage from your link you've indicating this one (my bold highlighting added) ? Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women. This law surpasses all others in both a…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 02:49 PM
-7

What did you mean by 'keeping female nature in check'?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 02:19 PM
-8

Islam (the most prevalent religion in Turkey) proscribes domestic violence against 'disobedient' women, not letting women leave the house or have a job without permission from a man, and covering up their bodies because the men can't control themselves. Is that what you mean by keeping 'female nature in check'?
/r/MensRights24/09/24 01:33 PM
1

This is you... Women cheat because they see the opportunity to capture 'better' genes, after they've got the security of being hitched to a beta-provider. And here you go again, casting women in a negative light in order to avoid accountability for your own words... Who are you, my mum? Dividing men up and pitting them against each other is not a winning strategy. Take the handbrake off your own mind.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 06:23 AM
1

This doesn't explain why you think dividing men into castes is a way to progress the men's movement. If you feel like you have no agency to achieve solidarity then isn't that a problem to be solved rather than expressing that you're controlled by women and defined by how they act?
/r/MensRights22/09/24 05:39 AM
0

When you talk about increasing your odds of winning a game all you're doing is centering women. Holding a worldview that pits men against other men will never result in solidarity or progress. If you disagree with this let me know why.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:31 AM
1

When you talk about increasing your odds of winning a game all you're doing is centering women. Holding a worldview that pits men against other men will never result in solidarity or progress.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 06:13 PM
0

The rate of cuckoldry in this Western population was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4–1.5%), and we argue that given the current data on historical populations we have to conclude that, at least for Western human populations, cuckoldry rate is probably in the range of 1%. Link A survey of 67 studies reporting nonpaternity suggests that for men with high paternity confidence rates of nonpaternity are(excluding studies of unknown methodology) typically 1.9%, substantially less than the typical ra…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:21 PM
-2

That 'one thing' is a reflection of the whole comment - portraying men as hapless losers and eternal victims when you're talking about a problem that affects less than 5% of the population.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:28 PM
1

That 'one thing' is a reflection of the whole comment - portraying men as hapless losers.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:24 PM
-6

Wanting to divide groups into castes is an expression of supremacist thinking. It traps people into misguided and damaging ideas about themselves and others. It amplifies insecurities and shuts down social mobility, and it does so without any regard for the mental wellbeing of the person it's projected onto. It's dehumanising and fundamentally misandrist.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:48 PM
-12

When people reference ideas like 'alpha' and 'beta' you know their brain has been cooked by insecurities.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:16 PM
-3

Feminists are way ahead of that, because they can withdraw consent during sex at anytime, that form is null and void. All they have to say is "That position hurted me, I said stop, he didn't" You say this like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:45 PM
1

Women now control nearly 60% of the wealth in the United States, and continue to control more assets globally: from $34 trillion in 2010 to $72 trillion in 2020. The article that stat is linked to say this... According to the Boston Consulting Group, between 2010 and 2015 private wealth held by women grew from $34trn to $51trn. Women’s wealth also rose as a share of all private wealth, though less spectacularly, from 28% to 30%. By 2020 they are expected to hold $72trn, 32% of the total. Somewhe…
/r/MensRights13/09/24 12:30 PM
1

Can you provide a link so I know what you're commenting on?
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:21 AM
1

Men have the same right to access abortion - it's just that some men, like some women, can't get pregnant.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:49 AM
-8

It seems like you're holding on to this idea as a position of strength. It's more challenging to open yourself up to connecting and being loved. Think differently. Be bold. Look in new places.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 01:35 PM
1

Feminists are a group. Men are a group. You said all feminists have blood on their hands when their are feminists that don't express the harmful ideas you have a problem with. So again, if you see some men doing wrong things do you think all men should be smeared by those actions? Or are you exactly like the people you're complaining about?
/r/MensRights05/09/24 01:34 AM
1

The same point applies. If you see some men doing wrong things do you think all men should be smeared by those actions. As to feminism, it's core tenet is gender equality. If that's what you call putrid, what do you find acceptable instead?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:29 AM
1

Is that what you say about innocent men who have to wear the baggage of those who harm others?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:31 AM
1

I think you're talking about female supremacists, who are not feminists by definition. You're talking to a feminist who rejects those values.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:48 AM
1

It's good to see you changing your mind. I never “implied” this bullshit about her having no choice, or facing extreme consequences if she said no. When you say things like 'I'd have her agree to X' rather than 'I'd ask her if she would like to do X' that's exactly what you're doing. Now you're able to see how wrong that was. No, it’s not women’s “only” way to achieve worth by getting pregnant. however, in this hypothetical, YES, it would be the way to maximize your worth to others, because no o…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:44 AM
1

That's a lot of words to say 'I was wrong in my last comment but I can't admit it'. Over 800 words in fact to produce endless mental gymnastics and irrelevant examples that have nothing to do with what we were discussing. It’s not “do it or we kill you.” It’s “do it and we will meet any request you like.” Which implies that if she doesn't do what you want her to do she won't be afforded basic protection from harm. You haven't shifted your position at all. You're just repeating the idea that bein…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 04:56 AM
0

I mean a real deal. Two way agreement. But I bet she’d take the offer in exchange for that level of safety and lifestyle. Your 'deal' is that the woman either gets pregnant or faces violence. People cannot consent to acts that are forced upon them. You think the woman would be seen as anything less than a goddess? You're not seeing someone as a 'goddess' when you're saying 'get pregnant or else something bad will happen to you'. It’s not having children suddenly makes it so you can’t be yourself…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 02:40 AM
1

I didn't read the two sentence halves as a joint condition. My bad.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:02 PM
0

It was NEVER the other way around where it was legal for men to rape women and illegal for women to rape men. Rape by men against women within marriage has been legal in many countries and has only been challenged in recent history. There's an article about challenging those laws in India here. I get not 'both sidesing' an issue but you seemed to be backing that up with a false assertion. Edit: To be clear I support gender neutral laws, and this happens to line up with the core tenet of feminism…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 02:23 PM
-2

You've said you'd have the women to agree to... become a dehumanised reproductive machine? And that's your version of being 'safe'?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 01:28 PM
1

Okay.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:17 PM
1

Okay.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 11:16 PM
1

The purpose is to show how bigoted and flawed your rhetoric is. I haven't made any bigoted comments about Black or Jewish people. We already established that they do not present a bigger threat than other groups of people, as opposed to men that do. When you say things like... The only problem I have is when you people say shit like “men commit 69 quintillion percent of crime.” ... you're just introducing a strawman argument to get away from a truth that makes you uncomfortable. It sounds like y…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:07 AM
1

The notion that Jews control banks and media has existed for decades, even centuries. Yes that wrongful notion does exist but that doesn't explain why you brought it up, or why you keep deflecting to the subject of Black and Jewish people. Every single use of “By other men” is trying to make men who are murdered or abuse less of victims. How exactly have you arrived at that conclusion? You're not making a logical argument as to how acknowledging that men kill other men or men abuse other men mak…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 01:29 AM
1

They do pose a bigger risk if you make up some bullshit about them controlling the banks or media. Are you making up some bullshit about them controlling the banks or media? Why are you introducing further smears? You and the rest of your ilk is the one implying that. If you're making that claim you must be able to give an example of where I've implied that. *Convicted, charged and arrested far more than other groups Are you saying that other groups are secretly committing 95% of murders and nea…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:15 AM
1

All people do pose a potential risk. That's the nature of being human. The difference is that blacks and Jews pose a far bigger risk than those other groups. That's where your examples fall apart. Other groups like Blacks and Jews don't pose a far bigger risk. Men in general pose a far bigger risk because men commit 95% of murders and nearly 100% of rapes. You said “by other men,” so of course you’re implying that. This doesn't follow. How do you think men being killed by other men makes them le…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 11:08 PM
1

Women support illegals. If they were really scared of men, they would never vote for sanctuary city policies so quit telling lies. Maybe women support/aren't afraid of illegals because... Those in the US illegally are probably less likely to commit offenses than those born here, according to the available data. You can read about it here. Also, women don't show aversion towards female teachers and cars the same way so you are only exposing fake and double standards of women. Some women do have a…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:37 PM
1

It's not wrongful to say that all people, or all people in a group, are potentially harmful. It's not an argument. It's a basic fact. Sure tyrants promote related ideas to further their own quest for power, but they do it in a way that excludes the possibility that some people in the target group are not dangerous. Like in the M&Ms analogy if you do encounter all the members of a group you're going end up interacting with harmful people. Women collectively encounter all men, and they share those…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:03 AM
1

Saying that all people, including female teachers, are capable of harming others is not a stereotype.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 06:11 AM
1

Then why did you say it? It was a reference to the statement OP originally made about seeing all men as evil. I'm not under any restriction to not portray the multiple ways people process the same information. It's true that some people perceive things that way. It's prominent in the way children can have their worldview informed by interactions with one abusive individual, and then carry that worldview into adulthood. It's reasonable to think that all men pose a potential risk, just like it's r…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 05:09 AM
1

And again, why would they? You haven’t really explained that part. The potential to change isn’t really shown when the foundation of the movement hasn’t really changed much. The long term trend is undeniably towards more equality. That's a good indicator that those changes will come in time.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:37 AM
1

But why would similar views towards men be thrown out? This implies that feminists aren't throwing out those views, but it's a broach church with diverse opinions. Men and women are constantly around each other, and harm by one gender can result in harm to another. If you're not engaged in reducing harms to both genders you're not fully engaged in reducing harms to your own gender. Just because this is missing from dominant voices in the feminist movement it is not an indication this is missing …
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:52 AM
1

Please tell me the real life equivalent of eating a whole bowl of... men? Encountering all men. Collectively women have encountered all men, and they talk about their experiences in doing so. The result for some women is a high generalised fear of men, and for some it's a low generalised fear.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:29 AM
1

That’s exactly what you’re doing. I'm saying that's what some people do. Also, that's not my view. See my comment here. 95% of murders and Wrong. It’s more like 80% to 88% based on what I’ve seen. I got my statistics from here. nearly 100% of rapes. That’s what happens when one gender can’t legally rape the other. You can't know if that estimation would change if rape laws were gender neutral but I hear what you're saying about the lack of reporting and prosecution. Are the girls trafficked by G…
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:22 AM
1

I can't know how you plan to apply this to race but you're welcome to illustrate what you mean.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 12:58 AM
0

Folks love this analogy. It falls apart miserably if you are rational. As I've said in other comments the analogy is crude. Some will see the whole bowl as poison and some will see the bowl as a mix of poison and non-poison. In both scenarios if you eat the whole bowl you're getting poisoned. Let us change this analogy and note the reaction within yourself... One of out of 100 black men are evil, so you're gonna look at the whole bowl like it's poison 8 out of 100 reported rapes are found to fac…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:03 PM
1

I'd say the definition is still accurate but that the most prominent women in the movement are yet to catch up with those ideals. It's good to remember that swerfs and terfs once represented the mainstream views of feminists, and they're now rejected in that community. I can foresee a future where women's rights and men's rights come into sync. It's the future I'd rather aim for.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 05:33 PM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:52 PM
1

Feminism as a movement doesn’t shy away from female supremacy in practice, because its foundations are not built to avoid such. To me it shows that movements like feminism are just as susceptible to being dominated internally by certain groups, even when the people in those groups are not really feminists. I'd still say that the foundations of feminism is built from gender equality. Getting back to that directive is probably going to be helped by the activism of men, just as much as it is by wom…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:23 PM
1

The percentage I gave for murder was from global reporting, not from just one country. The other statistic was for rape rather than sexual victimisation in general, as your percentage refers to. It doesn't get around the fact that due to strength differences women are far more likely to physically overwhelmed by men, than men are by women. Being around men is far more dangerous for women then it is the other way around,. The percentage of men who commit murder and rape may be small but that does…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:03 PM
-2

That's where the analogy is crude. All of the M&M's in the bowl are potentially poisonous, just like all female teachers are potentially poisonous.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 03:38 PM
0

We both seem to accept that there are female supremacists. It's worth noting that Stanton also said... We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal. ... so she wasn't a bigot her entire life. The White Feathery movement, while executed by women, was invented and instigated by men. This is contrary to feminist values which are categorically anti-war. We both seem to agree that gender neutral laws are essential to having a just society. There's aspects of the G…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 03:35 PM
-1

All female teachers are rapists by that standard. That doesn't follow. The analogy is about the potential harm from interacting with a group, based on realised actions of individuals within that group. Some female teachers are rapists. It follows that all female teachers are potential rapists, not that they are all rapists. Now it makes sense why teacher charged for having sex is a weekly news show up on Google. We can say with confidence this has always been a problem, and that it's good that i…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:24 PM
1

That’s the same argument the Nazis used for their hatred. That confederate leaders used for theirs. It's not really a fair comparison. Nazis were portraying all Jews as dangerous. Slave owners were portraying all Blacks as dangerous. This is supremacist thinking, as it is in the case of female supremacists who portray all men as dangerous. The issue is you cannot define individuals that way, and in this case it’s rare for strangers regardless, rare enough that this mindset doesn’t really make se…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:15 PM
-2

At the start, specifically white women at that. For example, the leader of the suffragette movement, Susan B Anthony, stated this word for word during a meeting with an abolitionist. I will cut off this right arm of mine before I will ever work or demand the ballot for the Negro and not the woman. Anthony was saying she wouldn't work to extend suffrage if it didn't include women (as at the time it was women vying to gain suffering at the same time as Black men), not that she wouldn't work to inc…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 01:33 PM
-1

It's not so much assuming all humans are dangerous, but more that all humans have the potential to be dangerous. At a more refined level it's a numbers game and we take into account that some groups are statistically shown to be more dangerous than others.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:51 PM
0

That's how a lot of people think about Black people, and it's the way they think about a lot of groups. In it's unadulterated form it's expressed as extreme fear or prejudice. Having said that it's normal to be wary of a group when you know members of a group do harmful things. That's the way our brain developed to help keep us safe. The difference in reality is that humans find ways of managing and mitigating the risks, and groups and individuals still form successful relationships.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:44 PM
-2

From another reply... The analogy to people is that there are dangerous men (and dangerous women) and unfortunately you can find out they're dangerous when it's too late to do anything about it. Looking at it as a 'bowl of candy' may seem crude but it's a good illustration of why the problem exists. Some people label all men as evil and we rightly call them misandrists. The very real problem is the potential for evil, and as I said above you may not find out you're in trouble until it's too late…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:37 PM
-2

The analogy to people is that there are dangerous men (and dangerous women) and unfortunately you can find out they're dangerous when it's too late to do anything about it. Looking at it as a 'bowl of candy' may seem crude but it's a good illustration of why the problem exists.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:11 PM
-12

Nowadays a lot of young women are acting like all men are evil or something. If you have a bowl full of M&Ms and there's one M&M in the bowl which leads to a painful death, you're going to look at the whole bowl like it's poison.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 10:21 AM
-1

I asked if feminism has been positive for relationships between men and women. Rape within marriage was made illegal because of the work of feminists. Feminists fought for access to higher education and employment, enabling more men to take on roles of primary caregivers and homemakers. Feminists have consistently taken an anti-war stance which only heightens the safety of men. If you don't see these as an improvement in the relationship between men and women maybe you're so polarised on this is…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:48 PM
0

You asked where the women were on the front lines and I answered that question. That's not going off tangent. They'll push for more women in higher-paying jobs, but they won't talk about how we need more female garbage truck drivers or plumbers. All you had to do was Google 'feminist plumber'... “It’s why I dedicated my life to fighting for gender, racial and economic equity in the construction trades and have proudly broken many barriers and taken my hard-earned place in this industry.” Or for …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:34 AM
-5

Hey Ukrainian feminists, why aren't you fighting in the front lines with your horrible misogynistic men? There are 5000 women in front line combat roles in the Ukraine. "From the first day of the war, women, along with men, have been queuing up at territorial recruitment centres to join the defence of our homeland. They chose the most dangerous specialities, joining the ranks of grenade launchers, machine gunners, riflemen and snipers, sometimes having ... a desire to become tank gunners, to be …
/r/MensRights26/08/24 10:19 AM
0

Can you put that another way?
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:27 AM
-31

The fact that feminism is mainstream and abortion is even considered, is proof that men adore women Being tolerant towards other people's basic human rights isn't a sign you adore them. What are you trying to say here?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:13 PM
-2

Children are not property. That is where you are going wrong.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 11:20 AM
-8

Men have their own responsibility to themselves. That's how you keep yourself safe. If you haven't agreed to have a baby then wrap up.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:50 AM
-6

You don't get to decide what to do to ur co-creator's property. This is where you're going wrong.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:45 AM
4

Something a lot of feminists seem to miss... Women and men live their lives around each other. Harmed people are more likely to harm other people. If you're not engaged in preventing harm to men you're not fully engaged in preventing harm to women.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:10 AM
1

Resorting to insults is not a great substitute for rational conversation. Maybe you're just hearing new ideas that conflict with your world view and it's making you uncomfortable. That's natural. Not every conflict can be avoided, even if you were able to fully indoctrinate people with perfect values about consent, emotions can and often will trump politeness. You will always have conflict between people. I didn't say you can eliminate conflicts. I said you can mitigate and deescalate them. Havi…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 06:15 AM
1

Well, there you have it. Accidents and conflicts will always happen, which is where we are now and my position from the start. Conflicts can be prevented from escalating by knowing techniques to achieve this. Conflicts can be avoided altogether when people act in accordance with consent. You're not saying why knowledge about consent and deescalation couldn't be more widely utilised, spread, or be more fully understood. You being oblivious to the many ways in which consent is already being drille…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 03:00 AM
14

You can be a misandrist without being a feminist.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 03:13 PM
1

You keep talking about this ideal but still haven't really put any realistic actionable step towards that ideal. I included realistic actionable steps. They included changes in the spheres of education and economic policy. Accidents and conflict will always happen but currently deescalation techniques and a deeper understanding of the principles of consent are not widely taught. Why are you saying that's not possible? Even if you could create the perfect upbringing for every person, on the entir…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 06:44 AM
1

Okay, will do.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:45 PM
1

Lol. My phone literally can't open PDFs that big.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 01:45 PM
1

You'll be waiting forever.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:53 PM
1

I did and I responded to it.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:52 PM
1

Have I not made clear that you don't understand gynocentrism? No, you haven't. I've quoted the widely held definition and you provided one too. They don't match up to the information you've offered about Ukraine.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:51 PM
1

I'm on my phone and it doesn't handle large PDFs.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:49 PM
1

I'm not sure what your point is.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:47 PM
1

as you told me a couple of times, do your own research. I did. There were no matching results. Wiki is notoriously unreliable for anything even remotely to do with gender or woke. You're talking about real women in the Ukrainian military which you can verify with a Google search. Your main tactic here is to not look at things that prove you are wrong to keep bad faith arguments in play.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:11 PM
1

You said this... after exhausting testing the US Marines said that women don't help and are a liability. ... but you are refusing to provide a link to this information. If I have a 100 apples and I deduct some how many are left? Some apples. I have no idea why you keep banging on about the Wiki page. You said it wasn't reliable information, while the women's names are there for you to confirm the information yourself.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:45 AM
1

Again, your personal idea of what gynocentrism is is crafted to promote wrongful ideas about male-dominated societies. It doesn't reflect what the widely accepted definition of gynocentrism is. You offer up material that you admit doesn't reflect what the widely accepted definition of gynocentrism is. I'm not interested in what your distorted personal idea of what gynocentrism is. Have I not made that clear?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:39 AM
1

Also you lied about this... Most of the around 45 percent of Ukraine's population (45 million) who suffer violence – physical, sexual, or mental – are women. You said it was unverifiable. The article cited the UN study the figures came from. Here's the link.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:33 AM
1

Your personal idea of what gynocentrism is is crafted to promote wrongful ideas about male-dominated societies. Again you're resorting to personal attacks again to draw attention away from the deficiencies in your arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:23 AM
1

and YOU SAID that women ARE NOT AS GOOD AS MEN in 3 key aspects of combat. Again, this is not something that I said. The highest achieving men may be faster and stronger than the highest achieving women, but that doesn't change the fact that some women are as good as men in three key aspects of combat. As to the claim that men have higher intelligence than women, that is a prehistoric idea which comes from the minds of male supremacists. there you go again: reliable wikipedia The women's names a…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:19 AM
1

This... Gynocentrism is a dominant or exclusive focus on women in theory or practice. Anything can be gynocentric when it is considered exclusively with a female or feminist point of view in mind. ... is not how Ukrainian society operates. [Oleksandra Kuzhel] quoted President Viktor Yanukovych, who infamously said two years ago: “If she is a woman, she must go to the kitchen and show her whims there.” Then she moved on to Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, who responded to criticism about lack of wom…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:03 AM
1

I said what I said.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:51 AM
1

I don't cry over misogynists. You are flailing around with personal insults because you have nothing better to say.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:51 AM
1

after exhausting testing the US Marines said that women don't help and are a liability. You're wanting sources, provide one yourself. and YOU SAID that women ARE NOT AS GOOD AS MEN in 3 key aspects of combat. I said nothing of the sort. You are quoting yourself. proof wikipedia... LMAO Once you are presented with reliable information about real people, showing that women are military leaders and war heroes you collapse into denigration.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:49 AM
1

You're not making any progress.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:36 AM
1

More misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:35 AM
1

Nothing you've said indicates that the survey results are untrue.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:34 AM
1

You are rejecting the dictionary definition of gynocentric because it suits you to do so, not because your definition is more correct. You ignored the information about the oppression of women to keep your faulty arguments protected from being disproven. Your ideas about gynocentric societies are no more than conspiracy theories and you indulge in them because you have a victim mentality. You denigrate the achievements and efforts of women because you are a male supremacist who is blind to reali…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:33 AM
1

Nothing you've said indicates that the survey results are untrue. You just close your ears when it comes to harm against women.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:21 AM
1

The statement that more female soldiers would help to win the war is a truism. Saying that female soldiers add nothing to the war effort or are a liability is just misogyny. Here's the proof. From this website... The Ukrainian Center for Drone Intelligence, which builds drones for the Ukrainian army and provides training courses for drone warfare, was founded by Maria Berlinska, who had volunteered to serve on the front after graduating from university. ... A number of women soldiers have achiev…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:17 AM
1

Every peaceful person hates abusive people. Peaceful people make hate abusive acts, but not hate abusive people. That you hate people does not make it true for everyone else. Constant Misinterpretations indicate you are not mature enough to have a discussion. You didn't like your own words painting yourself as a controlling person. That has nothing to do with whether or not I'm mature enough to have a discussion. Personal attacks show that you have run out of arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:03 AM
1

New feminist org keep popping up everyday so it's impossible to claim anything on all feminists organization. Correct. You don't understand the meaning of word "gynocentric" ... Your statement is laughable if we take correct meaning of Gynocentrism. Here's the Cambridge Dictionary definition... having women as the most important or central part, or only involving or dealing with women The last part we can dismiss. Ukrainian society does not only involve and dealing with women. You're not giving …
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:56 AM
1

Have you contacted all the feminist organisations see if this is true? You seem to be avoiding the question. Instead you say you've been asking feminists to do labour that you can do for yourself. Not sexist. Gynocentric. We've already established that women do hard jobs, just like men, and so that isn't a sign of a gynocentric society. If it was a gynocentric society, men would be doing domestic work and childcare while women do nothing.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:13 AM
1

That's why I provided the link.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:02 AM
1

Peaceful women themselves hate feminist. Truly peaceful women don't hate anyone. That's your projection because you embrace hate and demanding that another person adopt those thoughts and positions. That's why this is relevant again... That is what's known as controlling behaviour. Another one of your misinterpretations. It's not an interpretation, it's a factual statement. But your feminist brain is too small to process what I said as you have displayed countless times already. Insults indicate…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 09:01 AM
1

Survey is meaningless due to its small data size anyway. This is an arbitrary judgement based on the fact that you don't like the results of the survey. Why do you want to suppress information about the harms done to women?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:54 AM
1

Again, you seem to be implying that feminists are supremacists.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:51 AM
1

Except if you call someone misogynist for no reason Where have I called someone a misogynist for no reason? Having 5000 women out of some 900,000 on frontline is not same women putting equal work. Combat roles are hard jobs for men and women. Some female soldiers work harder than some male soldiers. Don't change the goal post. If you go back though this thread you'll see it isn't me that's been changing the goalposts. Every time I've responded to you you've moved off in another direction. It's o…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:49 AM
1

Again, you seem to be implying that feminists are supremacists.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:37 AM
1

This is hate speech... I would never touch a feminist, never... They are generally ugly, childish, abusive and rapist. They also smell terrible. They are also the biggest golddigger. You're not going to attract women by saying things like that, unless you're trying to attract another misogynist. Is that what you need - for the person you are with to adopt all your thoughts and positions? That is what's known as controlling behaviour.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:34 AM
1

Yes I recommend every sane person to read that whole thread. You were saying this just a moment ago... I don't want any young impressionable boy to read your stupid comment and believe in feminist propaganda Which one is it?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:29 AM
1

Go and compute the P-value from your cited survey. I'm not sure why you think you can tell me what to do. It shows that you are not familiar with the idea of consent. I think that alone would dismantle your idiotic survey. You say the survey is idiotic because you don't like the results. You do understand that this is the scientific process. Right? This is how scientific consensus is formed. They study and then submit their report in peer-reviewed journal where other scientists review / reproduc…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:27 AM
1

Asking if you've met all feminists isn't a dumb question, because you were making unfounded statements about what all feminists think. Resorting to insults doesn't help your argument either. Tell me why not a single feminist organization was in support of gender-neutral laws. Have you contacted all the feminist organisations see if this is true? Why do we not have women's quota in front-line military jobs? Because the people who make decisions about the military are sexist.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:18 AM
1

Misandry is wrong. So is misogyny. Is that what you needed to hear?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:09 AM
1

I prefer quiet, peaceful, beautiful women who don't mind doing chores, who don't rape minor boys, and who are not gold diggers. Also, they should smell nice. Generally speaking peaceful women don't like hate speech.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:07 AM
1

Here's a link to my initial response so your attempt at censorship is thwarted.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:03 AM
1

You are feminist. Thus you hold biases against men. Go on. Tell me why you feel this way. Have you met all feminists?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 08:00 AM
1

You called many folks here misogynists for no valid reason (including me). Have a taste of your own medicine, Misandrist. You seem upset that you were made accountable for your prejudiced views, but calling someone a misogynist does not automatically make you a misandrist. Exceptions don't make the rule. Come back once female participation in the military crosses 40%. Having a hard job in a combat role is not putting someone on a pedestal. Introducing arbitrary figures to shift the goalposts doe…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:57 AM
1

You seem to be implying that feminists are supremacists. That's not a complete line of of thinking. Neither is saying that criticising white supremacists is misandry.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:43 AM
1

No, I'm just saying no to you. Is that something that you don't like about feminists - that they say no to you?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:38 AM
1

I already responded to this comment.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:36 AM
1

Again, where have I made my biases clear?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:36 AM
1

Every peer-reviewed survey published via scientific journal disagrees with this laughable ridiculous survey. That seems to be your way of dismissing harms against women, just because you saw a statistic that you didn't like. If any of my employees submitted such a sloppy work, I would fire their ass. No meeting or written warning? You seem to be saying that you are a deficient employer with a power complex.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:35 AM
1

Where have I made my biases clear?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:27 AM
1

I don't have to answer questions if that is my choice.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:26 AM
1

I showed the numbers above. They don't even make 1% of army. Feminists have fed you lies. How about women quota in military? In response to what you originally got wrong I said... Female combat roles are hard jobs That is not putting someone on a pedestal. That is still true. You haven't refuted that with anything you've said. Seem like Misogyny is the word you know, Misandrist. There's nowhere that I've expressed misandrist views. You are wrong again. No no. I just farted in your general direct…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:25 AM
1

You dance around or run away from every though question I ask. I can see that you're not satisfied with the answers I have provided you with. The answers I've provided are the ones I wanted to provide. I'm sorry I can't help you further.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:07 AM
1

He made his biases clear.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:00 AM
1

Why are you walking away from the conversation?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:59 AM
1

I pointed out why using them with you is akin to watering the driveway to help it grow. Again, if you chose to use them we'd find out if that was true.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:58 AM
1

Asking questions show biases. He made his biases clear.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:56 AM
1

My choosing not use something doesn't mean I don't have the something. I pointed out why using them with you is akin to watering the driveway to help it grow. If you chose to use them we'd find out if that was true. You seem to be lacking any evidence so instead you walk away from a tough conversation.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:49 AM
-1

If you're going to suggest the figures are not true then provide some proof to support that. Stating that you have biases does not prove anything.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:42 AM
1

In the real world I would get them mental treatment asap. Okay, so it's true you're all out of facts and arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:39 AM
1

So you don't want to admit that women's rights exist. You don't want to admit that more soldiers increases the chance of winning a war. You don't want to admit that the presence of women in the Ukraine military is more than a rounding error. I'm not sure why you are unable to admit these things. Also I'm not sure how a Ukrainian soldier would respond to being called a 'rounding error'. Do you always disrespect people in the military?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:37 AM
1

I'm guessing you're all out of facts and arguments.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:27 AM
1

I reject your demand. Do your own labour instead of asking others to do it for you.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:26 AM
1

Show me where I've run away from facts or walked away from the conversation. A suggestion that feminists cannot deal with fact. Feminists are women. Blatant misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:25 AM
1

That's right.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:22 AM
1

Like a good feminist, you run away from tough conversations that don't fit your propaganda. Typical misogyny. All hard jobs are given to men and women are put on a pedestal just for existing. Female combat roles are not hard jobs That is not putting someone on a pedestal. More misogyny. You don't even know what you are talking about. I suggest you watch a former female feminist Cassie Jaye's The Red Pill documentary before visiting this sub ever again. It's not a documentary that mainstream stre…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:21 AM
1

Just stating that it's relevant doesn't make it relevant. You said the numbers were miniscule. I provided proof that the numbers are not miniscule. That is relevant. clarify your statement about the number of perpertrators . I clarified my statement on the numbers of perpetrators by linking to a major news outlet showing facts that you are unable to acknowledge. Why can you not acknowledge those facts?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:11 AM
1

Walk away from tough conversations. Typical feminist behavior. A suggestion that woman are weak. More misogyny. It's good to reject misogynists.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:04 AM
1

How is it misogyny if feminists don't represent all women? Because you aimed your misogynistic statement at women. 'Not all women' is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 06:01 AM
-1

What's better? Fighting in war or leaving? I answered this question. Women are not forced into war in Ukraine because it is a sexist gynocentic country. There have been no female presidents or prime ministers in Ukraine. You are making things up.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:57 AM
1

Who and why are the women fighting if they set the limits? They fight the government to regain what rights they've lost, and keep the ones they have. So the Ukraine gov would rather be sexist than win the war? More female soldiers would help to win the war. The Ukrainian government is not making that choice. You came up with the "5,000 female soldiers", surely you have all the data at your fingertips or was it just a quick google to try and justify your opinion? Again, do your own labour instead…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:49 AM
-1

What's better? Fighting in war or leaving? Neither are good. You want to apply supremacist thinking to the question because you are a supremacist. I emphasized the word FORCED. Do you understand what it means? Women are not forced into war in Ukraine because it is a sexist country. Female conscription happens in other places. As of 2024, Ukraine's military has approximately 2.2 million personnel, including 900,000 active military staff and 1.2 million reserve forces. 5,000 in 900,000 & 60,0000 i…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:33 AM
1

It's relevant to this... If you were objective & honest you would say a "Miniscule % of Men". Are you now going to run away from your own words?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:26 AM
1

That's fine by me.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:23 AM
1

That's something you said.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:22 AM
1

What gender limits them? Women continue to fight for their rights in Afghanistan. Sure, Some maybe but the Ukraine gov isn't rounding up women on the streets to fight, howcome? Because it's a sexist country. Female conscription happens in other places. What % of total combat unit soldiers does that equate to? Look it up. Do your own labour instead of asking others to do it for you.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:20 AM
1

Facts'n'logic, the feminist kryptonite. Just more misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:14 AM
1

In a US study 81 percent of women were found to have experienced sexual harassment which includes verbal sexual harassment, unwelcome sexual touching, cybersexual harassment, being physically followed, unwanted genital flashing, and sexual assault.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:13 AM
1

Of course you do because you know the number is miniscule and if I were to frame the question then as middle eastern or indian men it'd be closer to 50% which completely destroys your argument. In a US study 81 percent of women were found to have experienced sexual harassment which includes verbal sexual harassment, unwelcome sexual touching, cybersexual harassment, being physically followed, unwanted genital flashing, and sexual assault. Your original comment was... I said my evidence that men …
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:09 AM
1

I said... The treatment of women in Afghanistan may be worse than it is in other countries but you're unable these things are happening everywhere. You said... I am not moving forward with this conversation unless you give a clear "Yes or No" answer. I'm rejecting your demands.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:47 AM
1

I reject both those numbers.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:39 AM
1

I said my evidence that men were benevolent and loved women were the fact that we did not do what middle eastern men do to their women. Again, Western men sexually abuse, rape, and murder women and girls. They mutilate their bodies. They promote and participate in child marriage. You want to minimise harms done to women because you're a male supremacist and your thinking is faulty.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:36 AM
1

Western men sexually abuse, rape, and murder women and girls. They mutilate their bodies. They promote and participate in child marriage. The treatment of women in Afghanistan may be worse than it is in other countries but you're unable these things are happening everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:30 AM
1

How's that going in Afghanistan? Woman still have rights in Afghanistan, however much they are limited. They only exist in the military because the physical standards were lowered so they could enrol, same as the police, firefighters etc.. Male only platoons performed best, then mixed, female only performed the worst. See: US Marines. Some female soldiers are stronger than some male soldiers. Some female soldiers are faster than some male soldiers. Some female soldiers are more intelligent than …
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:23 AM
1

Western men are benevolent and ultimately love women, and want the best for them. Western men sexually abuse, rape, and murder women and girls. They mutilate their bodies. They promote and participate in child marriage. You say so many women lack perspective. You say in your community women are lucky they don't get stoned for speaking their mind. Those are ugly things to say, and are plainly misogynistic.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:12 AM
0

You've come back with more male supremacist propaganda and lies. You said... Men went to war and women enjoyed' There's nothing to enjoy about having to leave your country and being separated from your loved ones. Disabled men, elderly men, men in critical civilian roles are not forced to go to war. Women are on the frontlines in Ukraine. Alaska was at a base between Kharkiv and Luhansk last January 25th when a Russian Lancet drone with a three-kilo warhead exploded near her. Shrapnel pierced he…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 04:00 AM
0

Please go to Afghanistan and fight for women's rights there. Misogynists are everywhere. I can fight for women's rights from my own country.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:21 AM
1

No-one has any rights unless they can enforce them or are given them. Only men can enforce their. From my previous comment. Women used a variety of methods to fight for their rights and won. Women enforced their right to vote through violent struggle and political pressure. Women exist in the military around the world, including missions of enforcement. Your misogyny blinds you to reality.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:18 AM
-1

Men died in war while women enjoyed. Lots of proof for Gynocentrism no proof for patriarchy. Feminists lied to you. This is male supremacist propaganda. Women went to war, joining the resistance, as drivers in transport units, in field hospitals exposed to enemy bombing and infectious diseases. They got injured and lost their lives. At home they manned radar systems, took cryptography jobs, and worked in munitions factories.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:12 AM
-2

The women in Afghanistan still have human rights. Those rights are being breached.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 09:21 PM
1

Trans men can get pregnant. Trans men are men. Men have the same rights as women.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 08:44 PM
1

I addressed every point you made with facts, just like I'm doing now. You couldn't acknowledge that you were proven wrong every single time and so you resorted to personal attacks. Now you want to start another argument. Perhaps you don't know when to stop.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 08:27 PM
1

You're angry and you want to silence me. Typical.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:56 PM
1

I wasn't name-calling. I was stating facts.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:14 PM
1

You did move the goalpost from reproductive rights and women responding only to power and blackmail That's what we were discussing. You're still defending a statement which I proved was patently false. I gave direct examples showing why it was false and you called them irrelevant because you were wrong and couldn't admit it. You won't acknowledge it as misogyny and that's because you are a misogynist. You won't acknowledge it as bigotry and that's because you are a bigot. You won't acknowledge i…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:03 PM
-3

I'm focused on middle eastern countries because this is where it happens most. You know this, and you know my points I'm not continuing on with a bad faith argument to try to leverage yourself onto a position of being right. I already acknowledged that it happens to a greater extent in those countries. I'm not sure why you find it difficult to acknowledge that these things also happen everywhere. No bloody wars... Black Friday was not even a riot on the scale of riots now. The Civil War was a wa…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:22 PM
1

There was no moving of goalposts. You asked me to prove the statement was false and I did. I'm not interested in talking about anything else or engaging in your derailing of the conversation. That's because you were wrong and you are unable to admit it. And this is the last chance I'm giving you since you seem to be more interested in arguing in bad faith: if the topic at hand is extending reproductive rights 1) would you extend them to men too 2) how would you go about that? Men already have re…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:55 PM
1

If you say that men are attracted to beauty and fertility no sane minded men will accuse you of misandry Women are also attracted to beauty and fertility. You're failing to describe differences between men and women. Power is important to a woman Power is important to men too. Again, you're failing to describe differences between men and women. You need to prove that in the aggregate that statement is false. Go ahead. Women understand quantum physics, mechanical repair, home baking, rule of law,…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 02:33 PM
-5

I'm not sure why you're focussed on Middle Eastern countries. In some of those places women have less rights but sexism, coercion, violence, rape, murder, and denial of rights happen everywhere on an individual level - to women and to men. There wasn't a bloody war fought for women's rights, it was willingly given to them because they deserve it and we love them. Suffrage activists burned down the houses of politicians and planted bombs. Read up about Black Friday, where women were violently ass…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 01:18 PM
-7

The proof of this is in the fact that if all men decided tomorrow that women no longer had rights, women would no longer have rights and there is literally not a thing they could do about it. Men denied the rights of women in the past. Women used a variety of methods to fight for their rights and won. What has changed?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:19 PM
1

Where is the misogyny in that statement? Can't it be the result of evolution or a proclivity? The statement dehumanises women and intentionally erases the positive actions and intentions of women. It is pure bigotry.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 11:55 AM
0

This is what you said... as for me I will continue to buy my Niece(and god daughter) knifes and teach her how to use them on people (and also defend herself from knife attacks) You're clearly talking about how to initiate violence, not just violence used in self-defence. Yes that is akin to creating child soldiers. as far as the UN is concerned men can just starve and die when it comes to relief aid. The UN supplies aid to people of all genders. Sometimes they try to ensure that aid gets to the …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 08:34 AM
-2

Well in this case: be honest. She simply wasn't and you're defending her, I wonder why? I was responding to this... Women only understand power and blackmail, that's their MO. The commenter has now deleted what they wrote, but it remains as a quote and was clearly a misogynistic remark. Misogyny does not help men seek reproductive dignity.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:58 AM
1

You know what just because someone sometimes has done something different doesn't mean you can rely on it indefinitely. This is true of all people. that's why we need rules. Do you have some rules in mind?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:46 AM
1

I think nearly all of what you've said here is addressed in my last reply. as for all the women that I listed in the comments would they be violently (I am talking about in the figurative sense) rejected from any part of feminism Committing a harmful act (outside of self-defence) doesn't automatically mean that person is not a feminist. It means that they are not acting in accordance to feminist principles. would feminists play the "they are the real victims" card and welcome them with open arms…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:26 AM
0

okay, so you want to somehow prevent all dysfunctional upbringings? Nothing changes overnight except for making the decision to pursue a society wholly based in consent. Placing the concept of consent foremost in people's minds is the only path to eliminating all except accidental harms to everyone. That means changes everywhere - including the way governments and other public bodies operate. It all feeds into how everyone is treated, and especially the most vulnerable. Caregivers who harm child…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:13 AM
1

I don't find it difficult to denounce and condemn acts of paternity fraud, lowering men's reproductive dignity, ejecting children from DV shelters because they are male, acts of violence by women, acts of rape and pedophilia by women, and the act of denying that women should be subject to rape laws. I denounce and condemn all those things. It's a significant problem that a lot of feminists and other women will not publicly acknowledge that the acts are taking place, because the injustice of that…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 02:16 AM
1

We're all capable of that.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:49 PM
1

It's not a realistic goal, It is a far off destination. The best journeys don't come to an end. There's a big difference in outcomes, between aiming for a zero harm society and just accepting deterioration of social cohesion. We're currently trapped a technological epoch where mass electronic monitoring has the attention of state in such a way that the social contract is in deep neglect. That's not how you lessen the number of dangerous people in the community - who are almost always coming from…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 04:47 PM
2

But what exactly is your point? Maybe that for whatever reason you don't have a complete picture of women and how they think. Humans are more capable of much more than what you've described.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 11:34 AM
2

Women only understand power and blackmail, that's their MO. Is this how you really think. Are there no women in your life that show otherwise?
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:38 AM
1

This kind of world can’t exist. It is unattainable because power dynamics favour those with greater strength, resources, or the capacity to exert force. That's only one type of power and in the long term it's influencing is lessening. There's an authoritarian backlash happening because society took a great leap forward with the introduction of the internet and it deeply disturbs the conservative population. The trend is still towards a pro-consent world. In other words, the one with the bigger s…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:35 AM
0

I’m failing to see how any of this rambling is relevant to the topic being discussed, or how these are men’s issues to solve… Put another another way, we're all trying to share this world and lowering coercion and force is the best way of steering away from harm and exploitation. Looking after men and keeping them safe has a natural outcome of looking after women. Looking after women and keeping them safe has a natural outcome of looking after men. Everyone has a role in helping that kind of soc…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 05:08 AM
-2

my thought is that men aren't at the stage yet where they speak out en masse like women do, particularly on personal issues I don't follow. What exactly do you mean by this? The men's equivalents of things like the 2017 women's march or the 2021 women's marches are not in play yet. It's notable that a man, the Prime Minister of Australia, said that the women marching were lucky not to get shot for taking part in peaceful protests. There's a long way to go yet for men's solidarity. You're just st…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:10 AM
-1

Not all men are part of the same social circles, and many men do actively speak out against violence and abuse though? My thought is that men aren't at the stage yet where they speak out en masse like women do, particularly on personal issues. Encouraging positive behaviour and promoting respectful attitudes towards all people, regardless of gender, is something that can and should be done by everyone. Very much so. The solution likely involves a multifaceted approach including education, commun…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:36 AM
0

A man saying: "Hey! stop doing that, its wrong!" isn't going to change anything.. I was more referring to men speaking out en masse. Also.. doesn't it seem hypocritical to you that men are expected to police other men's behavior.. but women are not expected to do the same to women and their blatant misandry? I wouldn't describe it as hypocrisy. More that it's two similar problems. But some women do call out other women's poor behaviour, just as do some men.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:29 AM
1

It's a bit like comparing height between genders, or strength, or fitness. There are a lot of women who are way taller than a lot of men. There are a lot of women who are stronger than a lot of men. Likewise there are a lot of women who have a greater sex drive than a lot of men. At one end of the scale there's extremely horny women and men. At the other end there's men and women with no sex drive at all. There's plenty of men who are not visually driven and plenty of women that are. People wild…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 05:02 PM
-4

There is nothing more to change That's a unfortunate thing to say. Neither men or women are safe. There is plenty more to change.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:22 PM
1

That's like saying women like chocolate less than men.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:17 PM
-4

What makes you think that as a man I have any more influence over the decisions/actions of violent male criminals? Because men who are violent towards women don't listen to women's voices. They listen to the voices of other men.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 01:04 PM
-2

sooo men have to be the protector of society and keep following gender roles? Men and women share the protector role.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 01:01 PM
-1

I agree with what you're saying. I think men have for a long time had a supremacist mentality. Equality for men and women in basic things like voting and education is new to much of the the world. Supremacists base their identity in oppressing others, including other men. That's why men are reluctant to form a peer group of 'all men'. As supremacist thinking dies, the identity of men as a group within their community will grow, and peer-like thinking will take over.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:51 PM
-3

Secondly, what are men supposed to do to convince other men to do anything, that they aren't already doing? Men are by and large, as a group, silent about violence toward women. That can change. That should change.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:40 PM
-4

We are being asked to be feel collectively guilty for a rape we have never committed. I think the implied request is not for collective guilt, but for collective action in denouncing rape and other acts of violence against women. Collectively men are very quiet about this issue, when it's so often the case that men who are hostile to women also don't take on board what women are saying. They listen to what other men are saying. What does it cost men to speak out against violence, as a group?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:36 PM
1

In answer to all your concerns the fact that by and large written history was authored mainly by men is not a reason to assume that women didn't make significant contributions in all fields. Science (for example) is only just now starting to uncensor stories about major advances made by women. The world's first computer programmer was a woman, for example. This was unacknowledged for a long time. Do you have proof that they did any significant "healing" as you say? There's plenty of information …
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:29 AM
1

can you point to the earliest known person who invented or who is credited with inventing medicine? It was you that said occupations such as medicine were invented only by men. It's up to you to provide that proof. Also can you point to a source about your other claim that early medicine was practiced by men and women? Witches were proto doctors, providing healing services to the community. It was only later that men banned women from higher education. Also which period early medicine is part of…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 02:29 AM
1

Early medicine was practiced by men and women. I'm not sure how you're coming to your conclusions about gender participation in the fields you're describing. What makes you think only men were initially involved?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 01:42 AM
1

The dominated them since they created those fields What fields are you talking about? Not medicine for a start...
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:49 AM
1

Exactly, thanks. I got it wrong.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:45 PM
1

A commenter said this... Men got to fight the woolly mammoths while the poor oppressed women had to pick the berries. And I replied with this... Women hunted and men picked berries. There are no female equivalents to figures like Genghis Khan or Alexander the Great. I guess that could come off as provocative, but I'm happy for you to point out where I'm going wrong. Maybe there were kick ass warlord women in the deep past. I probably shouldn't have said what I did.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:44 PM
0

Men got to fight the woolly mammoths while the poor oppressed women had to pick the berries. Women hunted and men picked berries. There are no female equivalents to figures like Genghis Khan or Alexander the Great.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:37 PM
-1

Misogyny in women is relevant. Thinking that women in positions of power are automatically biased against men is flawed thinking.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:34 PM
1

Is there's something you're not seeing?
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:18 PM
0

In the feminist movement rich intellectuals -'got theirs first'. That could be 100s of years or never. The prior imbalance went on for more than 100,000 years. The world reacts to imbalances much faster these days. Have a little faith in humanity.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 03:00 PM
-1

Family Law Court - 87% women. A New Zealand law journal referred to the Family Court as the 'cattle class' of the legal system. It's viewed like that in many places, and in many places women are highly critical of it as an institution. Plenty of female applicants and defendant think female lawyers and judges are biased towards men.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:55 PM
-1

Case law will catch up to this situation. Change takes time.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:49 PM
-6

The emancipation of women started with rich white ladies looking to get into the workplaces of rich white men. Feminism is not in practice an egalitarian venture. It still has major problems 'looking down' at working class people.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:00 PM
-8

In professions as a whole women can dominate, but not when it comes to positions of power and leadership. That's the case at all in politics and business. Look at who sits on corporate boards. The US might get it's first female president this year. It's 2024 and this is still only a possibility. And only the first one. Getting change at the top is glacially slow, and you need numbers to make sure there are candidates to appoint. Re-balancing is a very long term process. Edit: A word.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 01:55 PM
-15

When men dominated professions it wasn't a meritocracy either. There's a rebound effect taking place right now. Things will take time to rebalance properly.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 12:55 PM
6

This happened at the end of the Women's Football World Cup. The fallout is ongoing.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 11:26 AM
-4

Men traditionally used their privilege and power to keep themselves away from other people and other men. Men (particularly white men) have lacked self identity until now because they were not forming close relationships with other groups. Now men are stepping away from being a 'default' and are instead taking their place as part of a more connected community. This allows men to form an identity, and that leads on to the ability to self-organise. It's only then that structured allyship can take …
/r/MensRights14/08/24 11:22 AM
1

Adult women don't like sex as much. What makes you think that?
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:11 PM
-1

There are shelters for men where they can go with their kids. There are shelters set up by women's groups (who are also feminists) who also take in men and their children, as well as transgender people. It's different in each country. That's the way it is in New Zealand. It's just as bigger a problem that men are behind women in terms of advocating and organising for themselves. This is something that's changing and progress is slowly being made in most parts of the world.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 07:38 PM
1

This is like saying you're anti-Christian or anti-Islam because you can only hold in your mind the words and actions of extremists. Most people (and most feminists) live their lives in peace with others, care for men, and hold equality as one of their central beliefs. Supremacists are loud and obnoxious. They aren't a good indication of how most people think.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:03 PM
-13

Are feminists really the enemy? Most branches of feminism aren't female-supremacist (some definitely are) and were key in helping identify discrimination wherever it occurs.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter